| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't trust sites that have them - they're going to be so limited I'd rather just watch the free previews and then decide from those whether to join in full or not.
If there are no free previews, I'm not paying a single cent to find out if the site is worth paying for or not.
|
03-11-14 02:47pm
|
Reply
52
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No - as long as I can see enough to get an idea of the action, I don't mind - they don't want to give the product away free!
I know what genitalia looks like at this stage!
|
03-11-14 02:44pm
|
Reply
53
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I like certain niches and find general sites kind of dull. There is so much generic porn out there I find I need very specific niches to get past the general "so what?" feeling I get these days!
|
02-18-14 02:12pm
|
Reply
54
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
None of the above would put me off!
|
02-14-14 11:20am
|
Reply
55
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Rarely - I generally like to download the highest quality version but some true HD 1080 files are so huge I'll compromise and go for the next resolution down.
|
02-13-14 09:20am
|
Comment
56
|
Hey Little Dick
(0)
|
|
02-01-14 02:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
57
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Occasionally on impulse, but I usually do a lot of research first. There are a couple of sites I know are hot as hell but were streaming-only, and I just won't join those sites.
So now even an "impulse" one will mean I have done at least basic research first, though I join the same day I discover it.
|
01-30-14 11:38am
|
Reply
58
|
Breeder Fuckers
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Further to my last I did a Google search, and most links led me back to the same page, but one for breederfuckers.nl got me the latest previews.
Kind of odd. I noticed that on some of their other sites the previews are censored, with genitalia blurred out, but the ones with the Dutch .nl suffix don't have censorship.
Weird stuff! Thanks for checking Khan.
|
01-24-14 03:52pm
|
Reply
59
|
Breeder Fuckers
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Hmmm.... that's not what I see when I click the link.
I wonder if they've got it appearing differently for UK users?
Thanks for your help though.
|
01-24-14 03:49pm
|
Comment
60
|
Breeder Fuckers
(0)
|
|
01-24-14 12:46pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
61
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Rather unlikely - even with a big discount it just doesn't seem worth it when I can join for a month and then rejoin in a few months more cheaply.
I know that's probably a but unfair on the site, but hey I have only so much money available for porn and I have to get the best value I can.
It isn't my fault the model they use for running their sites means the customer gets better value with shorter memberships.
|
09-10-13 05:22am
|
Reply
62
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No and no plans to get one. Tattoos are becoming so ubiquitous in the UK that frankly before long the rebels will be the ones with no tattoos!
I can find them kind of sexy on men, but I know if I got one I would end up changing my mind about the design later, and I also think they can look bad when you get older and your skin changes.
I'm afraid I'm really old-fashioned and just think tattoos look wrong on women. I know that's totally sexist and out of date but it's just how I feel. Of course I don't find women sexy but I can appreciate beauty in a woman and I've yet to see a woman I felt a tattoo enhanced the beauty of. To me even the smallest, best-done and most tasteful tattoos look wrong, because to me tattoos are just not feminine things.
|
09-09-13 02:25am
|
Reply
63
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Happy to use an assigned one and then just use the "remember me" option. I rarely stay a member more than a month at a time anyway, so I'd never remember one I made up any better unless I compromised security further by using one I use on another site.
|
09-07-13 03:41pm
|
Reply
64
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I tend not to follow individual models that closely - the type of model who is a known "porn star" rarely appeals to me as they are usually in very mainstream, glitzy porn.
I prefer more "real", down-and-dirty porn and in that you tend to get a first name if you get one at all!
The name does vary across sites, so I tend to use the first name I know they by and then put their other name(s) in the file name.
|
09-03-13 07:56am
|
Reply
65
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Roberto281's Reply
Good point! I was so mad with them I wasn't thinking! Maybe they could put a warning notice on their TBP page?
|
09-02-13 09:22pm
|
Reply
66
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
Wow that's awful. I genuinely think this site should be removed from PU and TBP until they quit this. It's more than just cross-selling.
I think people should boycott this site until it quits this and pledges never to do it, or anything similar, again.
Anyone who is a current member should leave and tell them the reason why.
|
09-02-13 02:52pm
|
Reply
67
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yep - compared to what you used to have to pay for a single DVD (or videotape for those old enough to recall!) I reckon most sites give you a lot more than that.
|
08-29-13 05:02pm
|
Reply
68
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't watch it as I don't find Japanese porn to my taste, but I've seen samples of it and it renders the porn completely pointless and unwatchable in my opinion.
I have no clue why anyone would spend good money on censored porn - it's a oxymoron!
So I had to pick "I don't watch Japanese content" and I admit I wouldn't even if it was uncensored - but if I did want to see it, I'd have to pick "absolutely hate it".
|
08-23-13 02:36am
|
Reply
69
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes. Having had bank fraud on my account twice, both times via internet, I am super-careful. If it's not a name I've heard of and trust, I will not join the site no matter how hot it looks.
I trust Epoch, CCBill and Verotel. Any others I'd have to check on here.
Sites that do their own billing - forget it!
|
08-19-13 09:15am
|
Reply
70
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think it's about 2.5 years old. It's a laptop and probably coming towards the end of its life but I love it - I was a bargain and has served me well.
I am also reluctant to get a new one as my current one came with Windows 7, which I am very happy with, and I don't like the sound of Windows 8 at all.
|
08-17-13 03:06am
|
Reply
71
|
Young Straight Boys
(0)
|
Reply of
SFguy's Comment
Hey there my fellow gay PU-er! Great to see you back. Not a site I'd heard of so your comment is useful - I might have tried it but streaming-only and poor selection makes it a no-no, so you've saved me some dough! Thanks.
|
08-14-13 04:46pm
|
Reply
72
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Other - I don't think any of those options will occur.
Pictures still seem to be going strong and there is still a market for them - so I can't see what would change that in ten years. Video has been around long enough to kill pictures if it was going to - there is clearly still demand for pics in the face of video so I can see nothing that would change that.
I agree porn does seem to have gotten progressively more brutal, but not all porn. I also don't see how it could go much further without being illegal, so I think we've seen as brutal as we're going to get.
Less brutal to attract women? There is already porn aimed at women, and porn not especially aimed at women, which is less brutal. Brutal porn is really a genre of porn, not porn itself.
Every night on prime time TV? I don't think so - attitudes to porn may be a little more liberal now but not that liberal - and the easy availability of porn on the internet would make it largely irrelevant anyway. Porn doesn't sppeal to enough people who are willing admit it to get the ratings on prime time TV.
|
08-13-13 04:12pm
|
Reply
73
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Also I would say that porn producers sometimes forget that porn is a fantasy. If you do too much "behind the scenes" stuff, you're spoiling the fantasy.
Given the limitations of porn in terms of production values and especially the acting abiities of the models, it can sometimes be hard enough to suspend disbelief when watching porn without them showing you all the behind the scenes stuff too!
|
08-11-13 05:38am
|
Reply
74
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I put "other" as it depends - if it shows them fooling around naked it can be kind of hot, but "bloopers" and just dreary shots of them setting up isn't sexy, and sexy is the whole point of porn for me.
|
08-11-13 04:06am
|
Reply
75
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Depends on the site really... some of the smaller sites really are one-man operations so you can't expect quite such a fast response.
I put 48 hours, though I'd hope it would be faster.
It shouldn't take it as long as a week because a site shouldn't have so many problems that it has lots of complaint e-mails to deal with.
|
08-09-13 01:32pm
|
