| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
NOTE: I joined this site for the hardcore videos. I'm not a softcore guy or a photo guy, so I'm writing this review from the perspective of a guy looking for hardcore video scenes.
- A lot of hot girls. If you are familiar with the slender, tight look of European porn girls, then you will know the type of girls they feature. Many of the well known European porn girls can be found here...but this may be a bad thing if you're tired of seeing the same European girls from other sites.
- Very functional site design with all of the features you would hope to find on a modern porn site (streaming for each scene, nice search options, clean attractive layout).
- Downloadable files are offered in a nice variety of sizes and the video quality of the downloadable files is quite good.
- Fairly frequent updates...however, there is a problem with the updates, which I will cover in the "cons" below. |
| Cons: |
- There can be frustrating camera work (too many closeups and odd camera angle choices that prevent you from seeing the girl or the action).
- Not many hardcore scenes...a large portion of the scenes are softcore masturbation vids.
- They update with new content often, but the problem is that many of the updates are just a photo set with no corresponding video. I have read that Diesel Media often posts the video on their other site Young Legal Porn. This seems like an attempt to get people to subscribe to their other site in order to access the video that goes with the photo set.
- I joined this site hoping to see more "artsy" filming style advertised in the tour, but upon joining I found that many of the hardcore scenes did not have this style. Many of the hardcore scenes on 18onlygirls.com have a VERY similar look to other sites like Teen Mega World, Euro Teen Movs, and First Anal Quest - Same male actors, same girls, same camera work, etc. |
| Bottom Line: |
The hardcore scenes on 18onlygirls.com come in 2 filming styles: "artsy" and "traditional". The "artsy" scenes are filmed by 2 directors named Ray Man and Dirk Milton, while the more traditional style porn scenes are filmed by a director named Anton Rusakov.
If you check out the tour, it is clear that 18onlygirls.com advertises itself as an "artsy" site with professional, high-end camera work...but once you join you find that only a portion of their hardcore scenes feature this type of camera work. Once inside, you realize that a lot of the hardcore scenes on 18onlygirls.com are more traditional and appear to come from the same people who film scenes for other European sites like Teen Mega World and First Anal Quest - I can't confirm this, but the scenes look VERY similar to other Euro sites. On 18onlygirls.com, the director of these more "traditional" porn scenes goes by the name of Anton Rusakov. If you're at all familiar with European porn sites, you can instantly recognize the same camera work, same lighting, similar sets, and same males actors from the other European porn sites. I'm starting to wonder if all of the various European sites have their scenes filmed by the same people, then they just lease the content out. At this point I have joined a few different Euro porn networks, and most of these sites look like their scenes come from the same director and crew (scenes on 18onlygirls.com, firstanalquest.com, euroteenmovs.com, & Teen Mega World all look EXTREMELY similar). Many times I have seen the same scene duplicated on completely different European networks. One of the only Euro networks that seems to have their own unique filming style is the Teen Core Club Network.
So, if you have joined some of the popular European porn sites before, the Anton Rusakov scenes will look very familiar. I wouldn't have a problem with all of these European sites looking the same if the camera work were better. Most of these Euro sites suffer from the same frustrating camera angles. If you have read my reviews before, you know that I place a very high importance on camera angles. Camera angles are the most important part of any porn scene, because the camera angles determine if you can clearly see the sex and the girl's body...and I think we can all agree that the reason we watch porn is to see sex and girls' bodies. There's nothing worse than clicking on a new porn scene with anticipation only to be disappointed when the camera man spends large portions of the scene zooming in on just the girl's crotch and stomach, or just focuses on her ass. Then there's the dreaded face closeup. Seriously - what is the point of zooming in on a girl's face in a porn scene? I can see a girls face any time I want by just walking outside of my house. When a naked girl is having sex, I WANT TO SEE HER BODY, NOT JUST HER FACE! Why can't they zoom the camera out to show me her body AND her face at the same time? For some reason most camera men in porn still haven't figured this out. I wish all porn producers would eliminate face closeups completely. Another thing that bothers me is when a girl gives a blowjob, the camera man always feels to need to zoom in on girl's face - why not zoom out and use this opportunity to show off the girls body as she gives the blowjob? (the only site I have seen that zooms out during blowjobs is tryteens.com, so I applaud them for that). So there is some annoying camera work in the Anton Rusakov scenes. Most of these scenes are decent, but not great. There are a few gems, however, where they really nail the camera work.
So I had some frustration with traditional style "Anton Rusakov" scenes, but I found that the "artsy" scenes were actually more frustrating. The solo scenes and "artsy" hardcore scenes are filmed by 2 directors who go by the names Ray Man and Dirk Milton. I was very disappointed by the camera angles in these scenes. The film quality and lighting were excellent, but the annoying camera angles made these "artcore" scenes virtually unwatchable. I found that in these artcore scenes the camera would always be zoomed in and only focused on one part of the girl's body...so you rarely got a good view of the girl's entire figure. This was maddening to me - here you have these beautiful naked girls and they're only showing you her legs or her stomach. What the? In the artsy style hardcore scenes, the camera would often just take a side view and zoom in on just the 2 pelvises of the actors...no view of the penetration and no view of the girl's body. Ugh. You can have all expensive cameras in the world, but if you don't show the viewer what they want to see you are wasting megabytes on these scenes.
There are some decent Anton Rusakov scenes to be found here which are filmed in a more traditional style found on other European sites...but the "high-end" solo scenes and artsy hardcore scenes are almost unwatchable due to the frustrating camera work and baffling camera angles |
|
07-29-12 05:27pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
27
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
dieselman's Reply
Thanks for responding, Dieselman. I do have a complaint about the scenes on the site, however. Like I mentioned, the camera angles on all of the scenes are too focused on closeups of the girl, but I'd rather see her whole body at once. It is very frustrating watching the scenes when all I can see is her breasts, or her face. Please zoom the camera out and just show her whole body for most of the scene. I assume that the camera man is doing the closeups to try make the scene more "interesting", but closeups aren't interesting - they're frustrating. seeing the girl's body is interesting. Her body is enough to keep me interested. Just zoom out, leave the camera alone and let her do her thing.
|
07-05-12 05:56pm
|
Reply
28
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
2 Free K's Reply
I agree. I really don't like many of the girls in American porn anymore - too many tattoos, breast implants, lip injections, fat asses, and women in their mid 30's.
I have moved to mostly European sites like Try Teens. These Euro sites have beautiful, natural looking girls who are 18-20 years old.
|
06-30-12 10:20pm
|
Comment
29
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
|
06-30-12 09:56pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
The main problem with sites today is bad camera angles. This is a problem that plagues so many sites. They don't know what people want to see. I hate when they waste so much time on closeups of a girl's face. In real life I can see a girl's face any time I want - I watch porn because I want to see a girl's body. I hate that whenever the girl gives a blowjob, they zoom in real close and just show her head - how about you zoom out and show me her face AND her body at the same time?...what a novel idea. I also hate when they feel the need to zoom in on just her vagina during penetration - you don't need to be 2 inches from her vag to show me the penetration - you can zoom out to show me the penetration AND her whole body at the same time!!!...let me SEE the whole girl, not just parts of her - it's not rocket science, but most sites get it wrong.
Try Teens spoiled me. Their camera angles are just so right. Once I saw their scenes, every other site started to annoy me with all the worthless closeup shots.
|
06-27-12 04:43pm
|
Comment
31
|
Casual Teen Sex
(0)
|
|
06-24-12 02:48pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
32
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
I actually liked the "formulaic" nature of the videos. They choose sexual positions and camera angles that are best for showing off the girl's body. So I don't mind that it's repetitive, because I know that for each girl I'm going to get some excellent full-body angles of her that really show off her figure.
I also like the "static" camera work. For me there's nothing worse than when a girl is stripping and the camera man zooms in really close on just her face, or just on her ass. I can't appreciate a girl's figure when the camera is two inches from her butt cheeks and is looking up at her. There is a benefit to just having the camera sit still for a while so you can take in a girl's body. Most sites spend so much time zooming in on ass cracks that by the end of the scene I could barely even tell you what the girl looks like other than her ass crack. In scenes from other producers I often feel like the camera man is on crack and has A.D.D., like he can't sit still and let the camera linger for a bit. When I watch porn, I want to see a lot of long shots to get a feel for the girl's entire figure. Anyway, to each his own...but some of things you considered negatives are actually positives for me.
|
05-18-12 04:09pm
|
Reply
33
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Review
Despite the lack of new content, this is still my favorite network on the internet. I have only joined this network once so far (and that was through tryteens.com, so I only had access to some of the sites)...so I still haven't seen a lot of the content, even from the dead sites. I will probably join a couple of more times to get all of the stuff I don't have yet. For me, the camera angles from this network are the best of any site, because they keep the camera zoomed out to show the girl's whole body - they don't waste too much time on extreme closeups, which is a major problem on every other site I've seen. Almost every porn scene these days just focuses on extreme closeups of the penetration for 90 percent of the scene...so on most sites, you barely even get a good look at the girl's body due to the closeup-heavy camera work. To me, Teen Core Club's nice zoomed out camera angles make up for any shortcomings. This is one of the only networks on the web that knows how to use a damn camera. The only sites I have seen that have good zoomed out camera angles are Teen Core Club and Fucked Hard 18.
|
04-19-12 04:38pm
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
It's all about the preview. The problem with a lot of sites is that you can't really get a good idea of what their videos are like because they don't provide video trailers and previews of their scenes. If the site would just put up a 20 second trailer for each scene, I would be able to see how they shoot their scenes. But if they don't provide trailers, then I'm left guessing and I will be reluctant to join their site.
|
03-19-12 03:21pm
|
Review
35
|
Hardcore Youth
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
The scenes on hardcoreyouth.com are made by the same crew who makes scenes for firstanalquest.com and some other Euro teen sites. They have the same filming style, same sets, same actors, etc....so my review of this site will be essentially the same as my review of firstanalquest.com.
-As with a lot of these European sites, the best thing about this site are the gorgeous, young girls. Just about every girl on this site looks to be 18 or 19. If you're familiar with Euro teen porn, you'll recognize all the regular girls from that world.
-some good anal action if you like anal (about 45 percent of the scenes have anal).
-downloadable files are consistent and good quality WMV (960x540, 3129 kbps, 29 fps) |
| Cons: |
-Like all of the scenes made by this group, the camera work is not great. They waste too much time on closeups and don't show the girl's whole body enough. Too often the camera will be zoomed in on just her face or just or vag. I find myself thinking "ZOOM OUT! SHOW HER WHOLE BODY!" I prefer camera work like that found in the scenes at tryteens.com - very zoomed out to show off the girl's whole body.
-small site. not many scenes, and not many updates
-Simplistic, outdated site design. Not as easy to navigate as some others
-they use mostly one male actor. I belive he is known as "Timo Hardy" in the industry. There is sometimes another male actor who looks similar to him. Unfortunately, Timo Hardy often can't keep his dick hard, and he is in a lot of the scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
I got access to Hardcore Youth as a bonus site included with tryteens.com.
Although hardcoreyouth.com is included as part of the Teen Core Club network, it is simply a bonus site and it is not run by the same people as the Teen Core Club. Hardcore Youth uses a different filming style than the scenes made by the Teen Core Club crew.
The Hardcore Youth scenes are made by the same crew who makes the scenes for firstanalquest.com, and some other European teen sites (I have seen some of the scenes from this crew on the Teen Mega World network as well). I have been looking at the Euro teen sites for a while now, and you can easily spot the scenes made by this crew based on the camera work and actors. As a result, the scenes on Hardcore Youth look exactly the same as their other scenes - for me that is a bad thing since I'm not a fan of their filming style (see my comments in "cons" section above).
The crew that does these scenes often uses the same male actor known as Timo Hardy. This guy seems to be the most frequently used male actor in Eastern European porn. I have seen him in a lot of scenes on various Eastern European networks. Unfortunately he can't get his dick hard very often. Google his name and you'll instantly recognize him if you're familiar with European teen porn. It seems Timo is in pretty much every scene filmed by this crew.
There are a few decent scenes on this site, but I would not pay just for this site alone. This site is intended to be just a "throw away" bonus site that you get when you join one of the main sites in the Teen Core Club network. |
|
01-18-12 05:05pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
36
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom22's Review
I agree with your views on porn camera work. I really wish they would learn to zoom out and let us see the girl's whole body from head to toe. It's a shame that in most porn scenes these days the camera man is always zooming up close on just one part of the girl's body (just her face, just her ass, just her tits)...you can't appreciate a girl's body if you can only see one part of her at a time...this philosophy that "closer is better" seems to have infected every studio and website these days...such bad camera work.
|
01-15-12 10:58am
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
i don't like large file sizes...a medium-sized file is big enough to see everything clearly...so it's pointless to download a gigantic file which takes up tons of HD space. medium to just-under-medium files are good for me. i prefer files to be about 500-600 MB...and a size of around 960x540 is good for me.
|
01-08-12 08:15pm
|
Reply
38
|
White Teens Black Cocks
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
no problem...I have joined a few different networks by now, and Teen Core Club is my favorite...their camera angles are simply the best...they choose smart camera angles that are best for showing off the girl's body, and like i said, they zoom out so you can really see the girl's body...i find it hard to watch any other porn after getting used to their superior camera angles.
|
01-02-12 08:05pm
|
Reply
39
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
host2626's Reply
Sorry, I didn't realize that. I have joined other Eurpean sites (like firstanalquest.com and hardcoreyouth.com) and their scenes were 29 fps. If you watch a 29 fps scene and a 25 fps scene back to back you can notice a difference in the smoothness of the movement...believe me, I can see a difference.
|
12-30-11 03:52pm
|
Review
40
|
White Teens Black Cocks
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- The scenes have spectacular camera angles. They keep the camera nice and zoomed out so you can see the girl's whole body and face. It's so refreshing to find a site where the camera man zooms out and lets you get a good view of the girl's entire body.
I find the camera work on most sites annoying because they focus too much on closeups. It's a shame when you have a beautiful girl but never get to see her body because the camera man just wants to zoom in on her ass and vag. Not a problem on this site.
- The girls are amazing...tight, young, and natural. I didn't find a girl on this site that looked over 19. They use girls who have the look I like - thin, petite, tight bodies with perky tits.
- Spectacular lighting. They really know how to light a porn scene. They film every scene in a very brightly-lit room, so there are no annoying shadows concealing the action.
- Nice slow sex. No hardcore pounding. |
| Cons: |
- The frame rate on their downloadable WMV's is 25 frames per second. This is lower than the standard 29 fps that other modern sites offer.
- The site design is fairly simplistic and out-dated. I know this is a big problem for a lot of others who have reviewed sites in this network, but it doesn't bother me that much. As long as the scenes feature hot girls and good camera work, I'm willing to overlook site design issues.
- A drawback to this site is that it seems to update a lot less than the other sites on this network. During the month I was a member, they did not add any new scenes.
- unfortunately it appears in their more recent scenes they started changing their filming style to be more "gonzo" like major studios. this is a bad thing in my opinion. in their older scenes they kept the camera nice and zoomed out, but in the newer scenes they move the camera around too much waste too much time on closeups which crop out the girl's body. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is part of the Teen Core Club network. There are various ways to access the Teen Core Club sites. The package I went with gives you access to 3 main sites for 30 bucks: tryteens.com, whiteteensblackcocks.com, and hardcoreyouth.com. They offer another set of sites that you can join separately, also for 30 bucks per month (with the other package you get their other sites like maketeengape.com, girlsgotcream.com, assteenmouth.com, etc). The package I chose offers fewer sites, but I really wanted access to whiteteensblackcocks.com, so I went with this option. You can also get access to all of the Teen Core Club network sites at once for the higher price of 50 bucks a month.
I have been intrigued by the style of the scenes from Teen Core Club for a while, and I'm glad I finally joined. What has always drawn me to their scenes is the excellent camera work and lighting. I just love how they shoot their scenes. The girls are also spectacular. Very young and tight with perfect bodies. This site uses one male actor in all of the scenes, but he does a great job...keeps his dick hard and doesn't go limp. That's about all you can ask for from a male porn actor.
The older scenes from this network are unique for their great "zoomed out" camera angles....but they recently made some slight changes their filming style at this network, so their newer scenes lack the awesome camera angles that made their older stuff so great. The newer scenes are still good, but now they move the camera around too much and waste too much time on closeups (It appears they are now trying to emulate the style of other European sites like firstanalquest.com - meaning more closeup and less far shots). This sucks, because the Teen Core Club sites were to only sites that had the kind of camera work I liked. When I watch porn, I want to get a good view of girl's entire body...I don't just want to watch a closeup of her ass. The newer scenes are still good, but the camera angles just aren't quite as good as they were in their older scenes. The best scenes are the ones from around 2009-2010.
In addition to this new filming style, they have also also recently started filming on different sets. They stopped using their typical set, which used to be a white room with a low bed. In the new scenes they use a couch rather than a bed. I liked their old set better because it allowed them to get great "high" camera angles where you were looking down on the girl...so, maybe these changes are a sign that there was some kind of leadership change at the Teen Core Club network. Perhaps they are now being run by a different crew...I wonder if they are now being run by the same crew that runs various other European teen sites like firstanalquest.com, because in their recent scenes they are using the same female actors from those other sites, as well as a similar style of camera work.
The video files may not be "HD" or whatever, but they are plenty big for me. I don't like huge video files anyway, because they take up too much hard drive space. The newer scenes are 950 x 540 and are about 600-700 MB in size. This is a good size for me...big enough, but not too big. It also kind of sucks that the videos are only 25 fps (frames per second). This causes the motion in the videos to appear slightly less smooth than the usual 29 fps file...but it's not too noticeable.
The hot, young girls and great lighting make the Teen Core Club network definitely worth checking out...they don't update whiteteensblackcocks.com very often, but there are still almost 100 good scenes available. Since they don't have many scenes and don't update very often, I recommend joining for just one month. That is plenty of time to check out all of the scenes here. Another note: about half the scenes feature anal.
Despite some slight changes in their set and camera angles in their newer scenes, I still consider the scenes from Teen Core Club to be the best out there. Their scenes offer great zoomed out camera angles that other sites don't...these zoomed out camera angles really give you a good view of the girl's body, as opposed to other sites where they will annoyingly zoom in on the ass and vag the whole time. They are one of the only sites out there that utilizes good camera angles - that alone makes them a precious and rare commodity in the world of online porn. |
|
12-30-11 02:26pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
i actually prefer smaller files...they take up less space on the hard drive. As long as the picture is clear and the frame rate is 29-30 frames per second, I'm fine with a small video file.
|
12-04-11 01:29pm
|
Review
42
|
Try Teens
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- The scenes have spectacular camera angles. They keep the camera nice and zoomed out so you can see the girl's whole body and face. It's so refreshing to find a site where the camera man zooms out and lets you really get a good view of the girl's entire body.
I find the camera work on most sites annoying because most sites focus too much on closeups. It's a shame when you have a beautiful girl but never get to see her body because the camera man just wants to zoom in on her ass and vag. Not a problem on this site.
- The girls are amazing...tight, young, and natural. I didn't find a girl on this site that looked over 19. They use girls who have the look I like - thin, petite, tight bodies with perky tits.
- Spectacular lighting. They really know how to light a porn scene. They film every scene in a very brightly-lit room, so there are no annoying shadows concealing the action.
- Nice slow sex. No hardcore pounding |
| Cons: |
- The frame rate on their downloadable WMV's is 25 frames per second. This is lower than the standard 29 fps that other modern sites offer.
- The site design is fairly simplistic and out-dated. I know this is a big problem for a lot of others who have reviewed sites in this network, but it doesn't bother me that much. As long as the scenes feature hot girls and good camera work, I'm willing to overlook site design issues.
- could use more frequent updates. This site seems to only add about 2-3 scenes per month.
- unfortunately it appears in their more recent scenes they started changing their filming style to be more "gonzo" like major studios. this is a bad thing in my opinion. in their older scenes they kept the camera nice and zoomed out, but in the newer scenes they move the camera around too much waste too much time on closeups. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is part of the Teen Core Club network. There are various ways to access the Teen Core Club sites. The package I went with gives you access to 3 main sites for 30 bucks: tryteens.com, whiteteensblackcocks.com, and hardcoreyouth.com. They offer another set of sites that you can join separately, also for 30 bucks per month (with the other package you get their other sites like maketeengape.com, girlsgotcream.com, assteenmouth.com, etc). The package I chose offers fewer sites, but I really wanted access to whiteteensblackcocks.com, so I went with this option. You can also get access to all of the Teen Core Club network sites at once for the higher price of 50 bucks a month.
I have been intrigued by the style of the scenes from Teen Core Club for a while, and I'm glad I finally joined. What has always drawn me to their scenes are the excellent camera angles and bright lighting. I just love how they shoot their scenes. The girls are also spectacular. Very young and tight with perfect bodies. This site uses one male actor in most of the scenes, but he does a great job...keeps his dick hard and doesn't go limp. That's about all you can ask for from a male porn actor.
The older scenes from this network are unique for their great "zoomed out" camera angles....but they recently made some slight changes their filming style at this network, so their newer scenes lack the awesome camera angles that made their older stuff so great. The newer scenes are still good, but now they move the camera around too much and waste too much time on closeups (It appears they are now trying to emulate the style of other European sites like firstanalquest.com - meaning more closeup and less far shots). This sucks, because the Teen Core Club sites were to only sites that had the kind of camera work I liked. When I watch porn, I want to get a good view of girl's entire body...I don't just want to watch a closeup of her ass. The newer scenes are still good, but the camera angles just aren't quite as good as they were in their older scenes. The best scenes are the ones from around 2009-2010.
In addition to this new filming style, they have also also recently started filming on different sets. They stopped using their typical set, which used to be a white room with a low bed. In the new scenes they use a couch rather than a bed. I liked their old set better because it allowed them to get great "high" camera angles where you were looking down on the girl...so, maybe these changes are a sign that there was some kind of leadership change at the Teen Core Club network. Perhaps they are now being run by a different crew...I wonder if they are now being run by the same crew that runs various other European teen sites like firstanalquest.com, because in their recent scenes they are using the same female actors from those other sites, as well as a similar style of camera work.
The video files may not be "HD" or whatever, but they are plenty big for me. I don't like huge video files anyway, because they take up too much hard drive space. The newer scenes are 950 x 540 and are about 600-700 MB in size. This is a good size for me...big enough, but not too big.
The hot, young girls and great camera angles make the Teen Core Club network definitely worth checking out...they don't update this site very often, but there are still plenty of good scenes available. I recommend joining for just one month. That is plenty of time to check out all of the scenes here. Another note: about 60 percent of the scenes feature anal.
Despite some slight changes in their set and camera angles in their newer scenes, I still consider the scenes from Teen Core Club to be the best out there. Their scenes offer great zoomed out camera angles that other sites don't...these zoomed out camera angles really give you a good view of the girl's body, as opposed to other sites where they will just zoom in on the ass and vag the whole time. Because they are one of the few sites that utilizes good camera angles, I'm willing to overlook just about any drawbacks. If you are picky about camera angles like I am, you will appreciate what this network offers |
|
12-03-11 06:18pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
43
|
Double View Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I'm pretty sure Double View Casting offers a photo set for each scene...but I can't really remember, to be honest. I don't really have an interest in photos, so I didn't pay much attention. I know for sure First Anal Quest has photo sets for each scene, and that site is the same set up as this one, so I would assume Double View Casting has photo sets as well.
|
09-28-11 07:16pm
|
Reply
44
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
yeah, you are right. I just wish they featured more younger girls who fit in the "teen" category.
|
09-26-11 07:22pm
|
Review
45
|
Double View Casting
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-This site is essentially the "sister site" of First Anal Quest. It is run by the same people and you will find that most of the girls from First Anal Quest also appear on Double View Casting. The scenes on both of these sites are pretty much identical in style and quality...So, seeing as that is the case, my review of this site is pretty much the same as my review for First Anal Quest.
-As with a lot of these European sites, the best thing about this site are the gorgeous, young girls. That is what drew me to this site. I was tired of trashy "porn chicks" and wanted to see some truly fresh, tight, young girls without fake tits and tons of makeup. The girls are great. Just about every girl on this site looks to be 18 or 19.
-most scenes feature anal if you like that |
| Cons: |
-Like First Anal Quest, the camera work is not great. They waste too much time on closeups and don't show the girl's whole body enough. Too often the camera will be too zoomed in on just the penetration so that you can't even see the girl's body or her face. I prefer camera work like that found in the older scenes at tryteens.com - very zoomed out to show off the girl's whole body.
-not many updates
-Simplistic, outdated site design. Not as easy to navigate as some others
-they use mostly one male actor. I belive he is known as "Timo Hardy" in the industry. There is sometimes another male actor who looks similar to him. Unfortunately, Timo Hardy often can't keep his dick hard, and he is in almost every scene - a shame.
-this site is newer than First Anal Quest, so there aren't as many scenes yet. |
| Bottom Line: |
When I joined this site, I also got access to First Anal Quest, so the sites come together and the sites are very similar...I think you only get access to both sites if you join through Double View Casting. If you join through First Anal Quest, I don't think you get access to both sites. The main difference between these 2 sites is that Double View Casting features the gimmick of being able to switch between camera angles during the scene from "POV" to the "regular" camera angle. In order to do this you must download their special "player" and you have to separately download each scene twice (once for each camera angle) in order to have access to this "switching" functionality. Or, if you don't want to bother with that, you can just download the file for each scene in the "regular" camera angle and treat it like any other porn site. I personally hate POV movies because the POV camera angle just gets boring and I can't get a good view of the girl's body from POV angles...so, I never even bothered to download their special "player" and try their "angle switching" functionality. I only downloaded the "normal" camera angle of each scene and treated them like any other porn scene.
-I'm not sure I can recommend this site due to the bad camera angles (excessive closeups). There are better teen sites out there that offer better camera work (tryteens.com is a good one). It's a shame their camera work isn't better. They have all of these beautiful girls, but you rarely get to see their bodies due to the excessive closeups. |
|
09-26-11 07:14pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
46
|
Evil Angel
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Great site design. Easy to navigate and find what you want. Has everything a modern porn site should have in terms of design. Sure, it could be a little better, but compared to a "bare bones" design like First Anal Quest, this site design is in another league.
-You can stream each scene to preview the entire thing to make sure it's good before downloading...no guessing games here.
-There are some great scenes from top notch directors like Jay Sinn.
-Plenty of anal if you like anal. |
| Cons: |
-The girls on this site aren't the best. A lot of the women are older (in their 30's). The women are often typcical "trashy" porn chicks with big asses and fake tits - I hate fake tits. Evil Angel also tends to use the same girls over and over, so you will get sick of seeing the same girls repeated in scenes. I wish they had more young girls (18-22) and more in the "teen" genre.
-Evil Angel unfortunately doesn't put up its newest scenes right away. In fact, sometimes it takes them months after a DVD is released before the scenes are put up on this site.
-The quality of the downloadable scenes is inconsistent and often poor. They offer WMV or MP4 format in various resolution levels...the problem is that many of the WMV videos have pixelated picture, and strange color shifts - just not good quality (even in the so-called "high quality" formats).
-the male actors are often old, washed up porn guys who can't keep their dicks hard anymore - big negative here. |
| Bottom Line: |
there are some great scenes, but the quality of the downloadable scenes can be bad, and it's very inconsistent. You never know if the video quality will be good until you download the file. Many times the MP4 version will look better, other times the WMV format will look better...sometimes neither version is very high quality (even if you download one of the "higher quality" files). The WMV format files often have weird color shifts and pixelated picture, and the MP4 format files sometimes suffer from choppy frame rates. This means you sometimes have to download the scene twice to see which file format actually looks better. The quality is just very inconsistent and unpredictable. The WMV files are usually bigger files, but the quality is often worse than the smaller MP4 file. You wonder why the WMV file is so large if the video quality isn't good. In this day and age this type of inconsistent, poor video quality on a pay site just shouldn't happen.
The women are often old, and Evil Angel tends to repeat the same women too much in their scenes. The male actors are often old as well and they have trouble staying hard...nothing ruins a porn scene more than a guy with a limp dick. It would be nice to see some fresher, younger actors (male and female). Evil Angel seems to be a haven for aging porn actors.
So, with these issues, this site isn't quite as good as it should be. Despite it's problems, I would recommend this site - There are some great scenes, but you'll have to sift through a lot of mediocre ones in order to find the good stuff. |
|
09-25-11 10:25am
Replies (2)
|
Review
47
|
First Anal Quest
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-As with a lot of these European sites, the best thing about this site are the gorgeous, young girls. Just about every girl on this site looks to be 18 or 19.
-A decent amount of scenes.
-Good anal action if you like anal. |
| Cons: |
-I don't like their camera work and filming style. I prefer the camera to always be zoomed out so I can see the girl's whole body and face in the frame...but a lot of the scenes on this site waste way too much time on closeups where the camera man will just focus on the girl's face or just her ass...I find myself thinking "ZOOM OUT! I WANT TO SEE HER BODY, FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!"
An example of good camera work can be found at tryteens.com - they're great at zooming out to show off the girl's whole body.
-not very frequent updates
-Simplistic, outdated site design. Not as easy to navigate as some others
-they use mostly one male actor. I belive he is known as "Timo Hardy" in the industry. There is sometimes another male actor who looks similar to him. Unfortunately, Timo Hardy often can't keep his dick hard, and he is in almost every scene - a shame. |
| Bottom Line: |
-I don't think I can recommend this site due to the bad camera angles (excessive closeups). They also have the annoying tendency of having the girl keep her clothes on for the entire scene, even further concealing her body. There are better teen sites out there that offer better camera angles (tryteens.com is a good one). Some people might not be as bothered by the camera angles as I was, but for me the first rule in porn should be "show off the girl's body" - and this network doesn't follow that rule very well. It's a shame their camera work isn't better - because they have some beautiful girls, but you rarely get a good view of their bodies due to the excessive closeup camera angles...it's such a waste when there is a girl with a great body, but they only show you a closeup of her ass. |
|
09-25-11 09:40am
Replies (0)
|
|
