| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
XP, Win 7, OSX.
Win 7 and OSX are on most of the time though.
|
04-02-12 07:58am
|
Reply
102
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm rather surprised so few like solo with toys.
In my opinion it's the best kind.
This because the toy can make the solo scene more "hardcore" without the interference of a male model.
Without toys is fine as well of course but the toy can add some color to the show in my opinion.
Lesbian sex rarely interests me for some reason.
|
03-30-12 05:02am
|
Comment
103
|
Twistys
(0)
|
|
03-26-12 07:12am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
104
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
Darn.
Up until now I've only been able to find the twitter pic she posted.
Didn't seem too bad but she was wearing a bra.
|
03-26-12 06:50am
|
Reply
105
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Reply
Yeah, figured as much. Loved the live shows though.
Thank you for the info, much appreciated!
|
03-26-12 06:41am
|
Reply
106
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
Great review!
Could you tell us if they may have started with the live shows again?
After they cut that off I canceled my subscription.
I heard they did some tests with new live shows at some point but I wonder if they're back for good now.
|
03-25-12 08:30am
|
Reply
107
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It really depends on the site for me.
If the site doesn't have enough content to justify a subscription renewal but it a special niche I'm interested in, I might just download the whole thing to enjoy for a couple of months before getting a new subscription to get the latest videos.
Otherwise, no. Unless the video is really big and the download via browser is too slow.
|
03-25-12 08:27am
|
Reply
108
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I use Google as my private tour guide usually.
Though it might be somewhat frowned upon, I do use video streaming services to preview a site before getting a subscription.
If I can't find anything, I go by the tour pages. If there are any.
If it's too polished it's usually (pardon my French) crap on the inside. If it looks like crap in the tour and shows there might not be a whole lot of content, it's probably crap on the inside as well.
I look for something in the middle usually.
|
03-25-12 08:14am
|
Reply
109
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
Really? Think I missed that.
What has been done?
|
03-19-12 07:03am
|
Reply
110
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
True. But she's not as spoiled as many others out there.
Just give it time ;)
|
03-17-12 12:25pm
|
Reply
111
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I think it's helpful.
It shows if the site has made any changes since the last review.
Sorta.
|
03-17-12 12:08pm
|
Reply
112
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Really depends on the new sites or content I will encounter ;)
|
03-17-12 12:05pm
|
Reply
113
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Spot on review, CT!
Especially the fact it's repetitive.
Great site but it does get boring sometimes.
|
03-17-12 12:04pm
|
Reply
114
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Great review! :)
However, I did cancel my subscription a while ago when they stopped doing actual public videos.
The uncontrolled environment is what makes public/exhibitionistic videos appealing.
Also, when they added a woman to dominate a the model, I lost interest. As did many others.
Nonetheless, great review!
|
03-17-12 11:43am
|
Reply
115
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I voted Fetishes as I think there should be more specific fetish sites. It's probably a bit too personal to specify the fetishes I would be interested in that aren't really available in large quantities yet.
Though it was more of a tie between Fetishes and Solo
|
03-13-12 02:50pm
|
Reply
116
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Low bandwidth and poor quality are the the top of my list.
But if a network site offers pretty much the same as the other sites which are tied to the network just in a different setting or with different people, I tend to walk away from that.
So, exclusivity and individuality makes for a good site in my opinion. Which doesn't necessarily mean a website can't be tied to a network, of course.
|
03-09-12 04:50am
|
Comment
117
|
Playboy.com
(0)
|
|
03-09-12 04:47am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
118
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Review
I agree, good review!
I like how you appreciate yet dislike the fact they went to midcore.
But is the new photographer better or worse in terms of shooting a model?
Thank you for the heads up on the changes!
|
03-09-12 04:36am
|
Reply
119
|
Audrey Bitoni
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Again, Cybertoad, great review!
Though I was left to wonder if the videos offered are exclusive or not.
Too bad they don't allow download managers, really.
|
03-09-12 04:31am
|
Reply
120
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
The fact that someone else recently did a review on the same site shouldn't keep you from doing your own review, so kudos! :)
If the same problems are addressed is multiple reviews, maybe the site owners will start to notice and perhaps think about changing.
But what is even better is when someone reads multiple reviews and reads that more people noticed something good or bad or had a good or bad experience.
Anyway, I certainly agree with you on the issue of lack of different backgrounds and too many close ups.
Great review!
|
03-09-12 04:27am
|
Reply
121
|
Panda Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
It sure is ;)
And thank you for the nice comment and trust!
|
03-09-12 04:21am
|
Comment
122
|
Twistys
(0)
|
|
03-09-12 04:19am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
123
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I'm a lover of HD.
Could you specify what formats and dimensions they are using?
For example, 720 is HD as well and that just wouldn't cut it for me.
Call me spoiled ;)
|
03-06-12 06:41am
|
Reply
124
|
Panda Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Thank you for the thumbs up! Really appreciate it :)
If I did a very subjective score, I would have given it a lower score as well.
But I gave it a score that reflects the appeal to the people that are into this kind of thing.
|
03-05-12 04:01pm
|
Comment
125
|
Brooke Marks
(0)
|
|
03-05-12 03:57pm
Replies (0)
|
