| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
Reply of
merc77's Reply
This sums up my attitude. Lots of porn actors that have no appeal to me at all, and fortunately there are many who do. But I'm not "refusing to watch" I'm just watching someone else.
|
05-23-19 02:40pm
|
Reply
27
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I log in to MetArt every day and have for years. I'm probably the person you refer to who was interested in the orientation of photos (landscape v portrait) because I'm primarily interested in photos for wallpaper slideshows. MetArt is rich in landscape photos, although a few photographers only shoot that for crotch shots or boob photos that chop off the model's head.
Crotch shots have become far more common than they once were on the site and some photographers include far too many for my taste. Spread butts and emphasize on the anus have also become prevalent for some photographers, which plays very well for a few of the more ardent regular commenters. I personally enjoy more whole-body, or medium close-ups.
I simply ignore the monthly masturbation video. Initially I found it annoying but as long as they don't try to substitute it for one of the four daily sets, I'm fine working around it.
|
02-19-19 03:44pm
|
Reply
28
|
The White Boxxx
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I lucked into White Boxx awhile back and, yes, some of the most gorgeous women and erotic porn I've seen exists there. The rest of the sites in the network had some good-looking women but they're all pretty gimmicky and repetitive. The truth is it's really difficult to get creative when the theme is "fucking in a taxi". "Picking up girls on holiday" is a little better as long as you're willing to suspend all disbelief and the models tend to be fine, but I don't think I've kept a single video from any of the other sites. YMMV, of course.
|
01-13-19 08:28am
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
I had forgotten about SuicideGirls for some reason. Maybe I used to occasionally see them on Tumblr, which I dropped. At any rate, you reminded me about them and I checked out their website. There's a tour of sorts that supposedly has 200 photos (I'm pretty sure I didn't see anywhere near that many). They are all very attractive girls and a lot of them aren't photographed with dense ink, but the thing is a few of them are staggeringly beautiful. I do love the usual glamour sites, but some of these models make MetArt models look just a bit shabby. Of course, I'm perfectly fine with tattoos in general and also a big fan of perfect, unadorned complexions. People who shudder at ink would do best never to check out SuicideGirls.
|
01-13-19 08:21am
|
Reply
30
|
Wow Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I rejoined Wow Girls/Porn a month or so back when they dropped the overcharge for downloads. It used to be my favorite network for a long time. When I joined this time, I only had access to two sites, although it's impossible to tell much of the time which is which or whether there is any real difference between them.
After reading your review, I took a look and discovered that, without notice, they had bumped me to Diamond and I had access to All Fine Girls. Which meant there was a lot of new (to me) content and finding it without confusing it with Girls/Porn is very easy. What does surprise me is that there are a lot of girls who are exclusive to All Fine Girls, with no overlap with the other two sites.
As to the quality of the models, I should note that a number of them will be familiar to fans of the Met Art sites, although you may not have previously seen them with a semen mustache.
|
11-24-18 04:16pm
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Amen
|
10-29-18 11:32am
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I'm sorry but I didn't see your request until just now. Not sure why I didn't get an email.
Most of the videos I saw were, I think, at Classic Porn(?) where a huge percentage of their content was German and French. It has been awhile but my memory is that the term "classic" was loosely applied. Many of the videos were not particularly old.
|
10-27-18 02:30pm
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Loki's Reply
Sounds like you're an old guy like me. I too prefer women that look like grown-ups rather than 12 year olds.
|
10-25-18 12:54pm
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
I've seen a lot of really hot women in French and German porn that don't appear anywhere else. And so much is coming out of Russia and Eastern Europe without dubbing (thank god) or subtitles, I'd be missing out on a ton.
|
10-20-18 12:36pm
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yujin's Poll
MetArt. I've been off and on with them for at least a decade and probably more. Some day I'll get a life membership, if I live that long.
|
09-08-18 11:06am
|
Reply
36
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
Oh, it's still being run by some of the photographers that he trained, but none of them have his reputation or his chops.
|
02-26-18 12:07pm
|
Reply
37
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
I was a big fan of Digital Desire back in the day but it's really gone downhill of late, with very few new models. They've been showcasing models that haven't worked with the site for years. I'm sorry to say, but Stephen Hicks died in 2013 and I believe it was his solid reputation and professional attitude that drew in so many beautiful models. I actually had a sporadic correspondence with Hicks and really appreciated his dedication to his craft -- and his taste in women. He died way too young.
Thanks very much for your prompt and helpful responses.
|
02-26-18 05:59am
|
Reply
38
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
Finally someone who can answer my only question about this website. On the limited previews I've seen, all the photos are in portrait mode. Since I'm primarily interested in photos for wallpaper, I want as many landscape (horizontal) photos as possible. If there are none, or very few, I wouldn't want to join the site. (And I'm guessing this would also apply to Amour Angels, which seems to be an identical site.)
|
02-25-18 03:26pm
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
I'll be dead, so why would I care if my son finds my porn?
|
01-13-18 10:55am
|
Reply
40
|
Hegre
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
So my take is completely different. As much as I appreciate full body shots, I prefer them in some sort of context (preferably a bed) for the fantasy aspect. Taking the model out of the framework of a room (not a big fan of outdoor shoots, especially not beaches) spoils the mood for me. I've had to adjust a few of Natasha's photos, true, because her experiments don't always work and I really do want to see the model but I find her images far more erotic than Herge's. Then again, I'm not a great fan of Stefan Grosjean, whose models are stunning but invariably surrounded by gilt and gaudy sets. It's a balancing act.
|
12-14-17 08:55am
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
I haven't deleted any of my August Ames files (although I was shocked to see how paltry my collection was compared to her actual output) but I can't imagine myself tugging one out with her on the monitor. Very sad and so ridiculously young.
|
12-14-17 08:48am
|
Reply
42
|
Hegre
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
She's Elin at MetArt and Aya Beshen at Hegre. I have to say, I'm disappointed with his shoots compared with Natasha Schon's (MetArt). She's pretty controversial there; people either love her more artful, less graphic photosets (that would be me) or they hate them because there are never any spread legs and Schon experiments with lighting quite a bit. I found Hegre's photos of Aya to be really pedestrian and unimaginative, although there is plenty of good stuff among the other models. And, yes, the models are insanely beautiful.
|
12-13-17 08:44am
|
Reply
43
|
Hegre
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
The PU price is said to be $19.95 recurring but CCBill reports that it goes up to $29.95 after the first month.
|
12-12-17 05:24pm
|
Reply
44
|
Hegre
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
Thanks for writing the review, skippy, very helpful. By a coincidence I fell onto hegre while searching for a particular model I "discovered" on MetArt. Hegre has a huge number of galleries for her and I'm curious how his vision differs from the MetArt photographer. Your review was extremely encouraging.
|
12-12-17 05:14pm
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Poll
Not asked, but my LEAST favorite ending is some Russian guy, who has been in the tailpipe of a gorgeous young girl for the last half hour, taking 10 minutes to jerk himself off while she licks his balls (occasionally glancing at the director) because of whatever drugs he needed to get erect in the first place.
|
12-12-17 04:42pm
|
Reply
46
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Pretty much exactly what I would have written. You can generally clip out 50% or more of a porn video because it's just some guy (not me) getting blown. Sometimes they're OK because, like you said, boobs.
|
10-20-17 02:54pm
|
Reply
47
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
A few of the MetArt photographers seem obsessed with close-ups of anus and vagina with a significant percentage of photos in a set dedicated to pink. As someone who uses photos for desktops, I get frustrated by this coupled with the fact that these photographers only use landscape for the close-ups, and mostly portrait mode for the rest of the set.
|
08-31-17 10:35am
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I used to proudly say that I never watched Reality TV and then I remembered watching three seasons of Last Comic Standing. One of those years the winner was Iliza Shleshinger who is HOT!
|
04-29-17 02:51pm
|
Reply
49
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
Thanks for the tip. Twistys used to be a go-to site but this is absurd. It looks like wow porn is doing the same thing: charging a good discounted rate but only for streaming. $10/month for downloads. This is not a good trend.
|
04-28-17 03:46pm
|
Comment
50
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
|
04-28-17 02:00pm
Replies (0)
|
