Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : sonofzog (0)  

Feedback:   All (109)  |   Reviews (1)  |   Comments (14)  |   Replies (94)

Other:   Replies Received (55)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 76-100 of 109 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Comment
76
Visit Penthouse

Penthouse
(0)

Join for free?

I've run across several links, including from the Penthouse website that offer "join for free", with no indication what that really means. Is this for a one-day trial or something similar, because I'm guessing a site that charge $25/month isn't offering real memberships for $0.

04-25-15  11:20am

Replies (0)
Reply
77
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Comment

I can only get to Video Box by typing the website into the browser search. When I click on a link from Best Porn I get a 301 Moved Permanently. Not a huge deal considering the discount is $3 but it is odd. Thanks to your comment I think I'll go back for a month and see what gives. Maybe they've improved the Roku interface. Beware of cross-checks unless you want a subscription to Mr Skin

11-30-14  03:16pm

Reply
78
Visit The Classic Porn

The Classic Porn
(0)
Reply of pat362's Comment

I was really looking forward to all that vintage porn, including the French stuff but I'm glad I didn't pull the trigger. I started checking the site when I experienced some server errors and for the last several days all I get is a bad gateway error. Sorry, but I'm not handing over money to a website that can't reliably even stay online.

11-08-14  09:34am

Reply
79
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It's just that they're always pre-checked. Otherwise there's not much point in doing them in the first place.

11-03-14  05:34pm

Reply
80
Visit The Classic Porn

The Classic Porn
(0)
Reply of Khan's Reply

Thank you. Yes, the discount is back but now the pages aren't displaying content, just a server error. I think I want to see some stability there before I subscribe and I realllllly want to have access to the classics.

11-02-14  10:34am

Reply
81
Visit The Classic Porn

The Classic Porn
(0)
Reply of Irina's Reply

According to TBP there should be a monthly discounted rate of $19.95 when entering the site from The Best Porn. No such rate is being displayed, just the $34.95 monthly standard rate.

11-01-14  01:14pm

Reply
82
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of roamer13's Review

I've been meaning to post my own review, but have been too lazy. Sticking around for two months was definitely worth it; the access that followed was almost overwhelming. I love the site with its abundance of gorgeous young women (almost all European, slender, relatively small boobs)--might have stuck around just for all the Angelica videos (and Michelle aka Red Fox). My cup runneth over.

My only complaints with the site have to do with lousy navigation. Just getting through to the updates can be tricky, but the worst is while browsing through a model's page. Once you've moved to the next page, clicking on a video page means that going back to the model page you always end up on page 1. (That's garbled, I know, but it's hard to explain.)

If you're into peeing videos you're in luck. Never seen so many although I don't really get the appeal.


09-24-14  03:48pm

Reply
83
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I have as little interest in handjobs as I do extended blowjobs. When 50% or more of a video is a girl(s) mouthing a giant knob it's ridiculous. One of the best parts of classic porn was the presence of real foreplay -- remember kissing?

09-24-14  03:35pm

Reply
84
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of SexCliche's Review

You saved me the trouble of writing a review! I've got the same reaction across the board -- navigation issues like you describe, plus using a back button from a model's page 2 set always returns to page 1.

Yes, there are oodles of gorgeous sexy women and typically superb video, perfectly lit with high resolution. And a bare minimum of super close ups. No more loving shots of ballsacks or cervixes. The videos actually use multiple angles (and cameras?)

I don't know why they separate WowGirls and WowPorn, but it means having to check both model lists for a particular girl. Mildly irritating.


06-12-14  02:05pm

Reply
85
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Is there an English translation of this question?

05-11-14  11:01am

Reply
86
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

How would I know what the "average" porn surfer is?

03-23-14  09:41am

Reply
87
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

I'm totally with you on facials (and for that matter, on money shots in general). Like most porn fans, I enjoy video that plays into my own fantasies about sex and beautiful women. Of all the lovers I've had over the years, from marriage to one-night stands, I never felt a desire to come on her face, and I'm reasonably sure it would never have been received graciously. I have always preferred internal release regardless of orifice.

The whole cliche of shooting onto a woman's back or belly or face is an archaic throwback to porn producers who wanted to prove that it was real screwing with a real ejaculation. I'm pretty sure we've gotten past that but I still see many comments from those who want to see a huge load on the woman's face. Don't get, never will.


03-14-14  09:33am

Reply
88
Visit Sex Art

Sex Art
(0)
Reply of nadiencendia's Comment

Rather than take the one day trial, I signed up as a member via Best Porn's discounted price and I'm enjoying the site a lot. There are a number of familiar faces (and bodies) along with many that are new to me. Unfortunately, many of those new faces are only shown as photosets, with no videos. The photosets themselves look like standard MetArt sets but with lots of touching and lots of genital closeups -- to my taste way too much of those.

Case in point is Mia Sollis, who is a truly gorgeous redhead and represented by nothing but photos. How much more erotic would a video of her touching herself intimately be? Sigh. Maybe someday.

My only technical issue with the site is that webpages take forever to open. Downloads are quick, but getting to the download page is painful.


02-27-14  08:54am

Reply
89
Visit Sex Art

Sex Art
(0)
Reply of Parsnip's Reply

I hadn't even heard of this site, but after reading your lengthy comments on Joy Mii and subsequent recommendation of SexArt I've spent time checking it out. I, too, have reached saturation point with anal and dp and the rest of fairly brutal hardcore porn. I do find lovely models but they're almost entirely turned over to anal assaults and trying to find scenes without it is nearly impossible. Comments scream about a lack of anal scenes even at a place like Video Box where there is virtually complete coverage. And, of course, the quality of camerawork, direction, design etc is terrible. I'm culling a high percentage of what I've downloaded over the years realizing that most of it I never watch. I'm giving it a try because it looks wonderful - of course I thought that about X-Art, Joy Mii and Babes at one time or the other, so fingers crossed. Thanks.

02-16-14  10:37am

Reply
90
Visit Joy Mii

Joy Mii
(0)
Reply of Marcus's Comment

Currently, the website shows the price as $14.95, recurring.

02-02-13  12:07pm

Comment
91
Visit Sapphic Erotica

Sapphic Erotica
(0)

Pretty girls

So, two supermodels walk into a bar.

OK, not necessarily a bar but more likely a room, or a veranda or the swimming pool. Without further ado, they commence kissing and touching and in very short order are fingering and licking. There is a lot of passionate moaning and unconvincing orgasms.

This is one of the main scenarios at Sapphic Erotica, along with the two supermodels are sitting on a couch scenario. The models are uniformly gorgeous, usually thin, and mostly Eastern European at a guess. (And Eufrat is Juliette.) Unlike Filly or Girlfriend Films there are no chunky older women or spotty young women and no attempt to frame a story for the sexual encounter and very few convincing orgasms.

Did I mention the models are gorgeous? As much as I enjoy watching a couple of skanky amateurs rooting each other like they mean it, there is a great deal of appeal in watching Pretty Girls Doing It Right. I think there is room for both approaches and Sapphic Erotica seems to have an endless supply of videos in high resolution. I'm liking it a lot.

01-16-13  02:44pm

Replies (0)
Reply
92
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

Bingo, and well summed-up in the final lines. "Mechanical" is exactly what it is and it's tedious.

01-03-13  04:09pm

Comment
93
Visit Pornstar Network

Pornstar Network
(0)

Need some advice

I subscribed to Filly Club, which means to PSN and I've been struggling with it. I expected to actually visit the FC site, with all its navigating tools and galleries, but all I get to when I log in is the bare-bones PSN lists. There is a screen shot of the Filly website but it's not linked to the site and I can't find anything else that is. If I go directly to Filly Club I'm plopped down in the middle of a tour and get the 18 year old Yes No page. At the site, "Member Login" takes me immediately to PSN.

What am I doing wrong?

12-23-12  12:40pm

Replies (1)
Reply
94
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of brig's Reply

I try never to speak for others, and I know that a lot of your customers and others want different content than I do. I like g/g scenes, solos and b/g scenes that finish without money shots--which I believe to be left over from the days when there seemed to be a need to prove that, yes, he really did screw her and he really did come. Why else would he pull out of a perfectly nice orifice and why oh why would he jack himself off (sometimes for far too many minutes)?

To my taste, the guys are just in the way, especially the guys with the freakishly large johnsons. If I really wanted to look at giant schlongs I'd be cruising through the gay pornsites.

I did appreciate a slight uptick in the number of better-endowed models--if only for the sake of variety. Your taste in models remains impeccable.


11-26-12  05:12pm

Reply
95
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of otoh's Reply

Thanks for the pointer on Joymii. I will definitely check it out.

11-25-12  08:43am

Comment
96
Visit Babes Network.com

Babes Network.com
(0)

Nice alternative

I signed up for this a week or two back because they had a lot of my favorite models, and the photography and videography are quite decent. If Digital Desire did hardcore, it would look a lot like this. In fact, some of the videos (Elizabeth Marx, for example) clearly were shot by DD. For me, that's a plus, although I know that isn't universal.

Navigation could be improved and the volume of material is obviously not the size it will be one day. For the moment, I'm a happy customer.

11-24-12  01:19pm

Replies (1)
Comment
97
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)

I'm out for now

I've had subscriptions at X-Art twice. The women are almost all gorgeous (d'oh), although a number of my favorites from 2011 are no longer appearing. Of late the videos have gotten (to me) repetitive and tedious. Far less g/g than previously and a lot more b/g, where they have fallen into their own pattern for every scene. I do prefer their gentle approach to sex over most h/c (no spitting, choking, atm, 40-min bangs) but now it's pretty boring.

11-24-12  01:03pm

Replies (9)
Reply
98
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

Maybe we will see a return to condoms. Any stunt cock who pulls something like that should be strung up by the balls, IMO.

10-13-12  12:00pm

Reply
99
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

Pardon my ignorance, but what's this about a syphilis outbreak? Something that spread through the Euro Adult scene?

10-13-12  11:41am

Reply
100
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review

I let my subscription to X-Art lapse in the Spring and I'm eager to re-up. The women are beautiful and very much to my taste, and the men don't look like escaped convicts. There is indeed definite rapport between (or among) the women and men (or women and women) that is very different from what is featured on most hardcore sites. No gagging or spitting, no choking or ATM; maybe it's vanilla for some but for me it's very erotic.

The comments at X-Art often put me off because people would complaining about the very nature of the material and demanding videos that were much more hardcore. There are a million websites that carry just that kind of material, and the complainers are certainly free to move on.


08-08-12  06:03pm


Shown : 76-100 of 109 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.2 seconds.