| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
501
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
You have hit upon a pet peeve of mine! Because I hate thong tanlines! I don't know why, but I find them unattractive, in fact, I hate thongs period!
|
02-13-08 11:31am
|
Reply
502
|
European Glamour Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Thanks for the reply Denner!
|
02-12-08 10:23am
|
Reply
503
|
European Glamour Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
I need help on this one please---I keep thinking of joining, but the photos on the preview page seem so bland to me. Either the girl is in a bathtub (not "glamor") or she's got her hair tied in a bun (not "glamor"). This site is called "Glamour" Girls, but I fail to see any "Glamour" in the previews. Would it be fairer to call this simply a nude site, or does it look better once inside? Thanks.
|
02-11-08 08:10pm
|
Reply
504
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I'll confirm that Denner is NOT a pervert---I never see him at the meetings! :D
|
02-11-08 09:44am
|
Reply
505
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
DivBZero's Reply
Thanks, I need to study up on my photoshop! :D
|
02-11-08 09:39am
|
Comment
506
|
New Nude City
(0)
|
|
02-10-08 08:40pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
507
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
I guess you won't agree with my review :)
|
02-10-08 08:35pm
|
Reply
508
|
Crush Photo
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
To tell the truth Drooler, I hadn't noticed the things you mention because I just have been downloading the zips and organizing them in my fashion. It is a bit if a different navigation going on there for sure. I just looked at the zip problem you mention. You shaould post in that forum and alert the webmaster about it. I know he just put those zips up the day I joined. As I say, the site still needs work.
|
02-10-08 08:33pm
|
Review
509
|
Hegre Art
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Hi_Res Photos
-Zip Files
-6 Sizes Of Photos
-NO DRM Videos |
| Cons: |
-Not Many Attractive Models
-Lots Of Advertising
-Photography Mostly Unerotic And Boring |
| Bottom Line: |
Here we go...the great "genius" Petter Hegre, I hear that over and over again. So, I thought I better give this another shot, and see if I can change my quick score from last summer. I couldn't. Hegre is a former colleague of Galitsin (whose site is closed), and IMO, he can't carry Galitsin's camera case. I see nothing original or exciting in this man's photography---competent? Certainly. Even professional. But the cause of raving praise? Hardly. And his models? Mostly anorexic types. A lot of them very plain. His site leaves me....limp. That's the only way to put it. Maybe the problem is he believes all the hype about himself. Maybe he doesn't want to pay high class models. Whatever, I won't be back. A real disappointment. Technically, the high res photos come in 6 sizes, zipped up and convenient, very impressive. Too bad the photos are boring as milk. The videos are as boring as the photos. 640x360. Good server speed. Nice looking site. Easy navigation. B-O-R-I-N-G. Maybe Mr. Hegre should be photographing Athens at dusk. Or shoe models. I hope Mr. Galitsin solves his legal trouble and gets back in business. That's all. |
|
02-10-08 08:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
510
|
Crush Photo
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
There are about 40 models, and they have multiple sets, some of them dozens, so it's hard to say exactly how many.
|
02-09-08 03:50pm
|
Reply
511
|
Crush Photo
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
As far as I can tell, yes, they are all that large. They do come in 2 sizes also.
|
02-09-08 03:46pm
|
Review
512
|
Crush Photo
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Attractive Site
- Hi-Res Photos
- Zip Files
- NO DRM
- Good Selection Of Attractive Models
- A Forum |
| Cons: |
- Low-Res Videos
- Vids Only Available In Split MPEGS
- No Vids In Recent Updates |
| Bottom Line: |
Crush went offline a year or so ago, so it is nice to see it back in action. It does need some work though, particularly with its video section. The videos are behind current standards, they are mpegs split into 1 or 2 minute segments, which means 6 or 7 for each episode. They are low resolution (304x240). That's not going to cut it in today's HD world. Hopefully this will be addressed in the near future, because I like the concept of the Crush "Empire". The site has an aura of fantasy and color which I appreciate. My personal opinion is that porn should be divorced from reality as much as possible. That's just my opinion, for those who have a preference toward "reality" based porn, this site is surely not for you. Crush touches more upon the imagination rather than the groin! The girls are attractive, and well presented. They are placed on a pedestal as it were. They are presented as erotic symbols rather than objects. The photos are hi-res, about 2240px, and available in quick loading zip files. The site says it updates every few days, which seems to be about 4 times a week. However, I am not seeing any new videos lately. There is also a forum here where you can communicate with the webmaster. This site seems to still be getting off the ground, although the old archives are available. Better video quality would have raised my score 5 points. HD is a must for a site like this IMO. A very attractive and interesting site. |
|
02-09-08 12:39pm
Replies (7)
|
Comment
513
|
Model Flats
(0)
|
|
02-09-08 12:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
514
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
OMG, The New Riders Of The Purple Sage appear on Porn Users!
|
02-09-08 10:07am
|
Reply
515
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
DivBZero's Reply
RGB values? I don't even know what that means. The 1 By Day girls are trollops, brazen, hussies, bad girls your mom and mine told us to stay away from. They prowl the streets as vamps looking for the next man to sink their fangs into. Put your wallet on a chain! Never give them your phone number, or your marriage is history! Get thee to Abby Winters for the "girl next door"!! This is the red zone, and all ye that enter are headed for misery, and death !!!!!
|
02-06-08 11:33am
|
Reply
516
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Poll
One thing about porn (American porn in particular)that disgusts me is when one of these slugs spits on a girl's vagina while penetrating her. Not difficult to figure out where they learned that repulsive technique.
|
02-05-08 05:10pm
|
Reply
517
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I bought a Vivid compilation DVD once, and it started out with 10 minutes of those phone sex commercials and they wouldn't allow bypassing to the menu, so you have to sit through them. Vivid really is a dinosaur in the porn industry. It's for people who never saw porn before and don't know any better.
|
02-05-08 02:29pm
|
Reply
518
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
CactusJack's Comment
I like make up on a model.
|
02-04-08 01:04pm
|
Reply
519
|
AV9898
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
I gave up on this site in a few days and kept nothing. The uncensored Japanese videos have all the 3rd and 4th rate actresses in it, because the top JAV stars are not permitted by their companies to appear in non mosaic videos. And most of them wouldn't anyway. So what you get here is a lot of low grade stuff. The navigation does suck also I noticed. To disagree with you if I may, the top shelf authentic Japanese porn is awesome IMO, the girls are very pretty. But these sites like the one you review entice with the non mosaic promise, without telling the truth. You will not see the likes of Maria Ozawa or Kaede Matsushima on a site like this. This is not a Japanese site BTW, it's located in the USA.
|
02-04-08 12:57pm
|
Reply
520
|
Pier 999
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
That site I gave you doesn't always get the latest updates posted immediately.
|
02-04-08 04:00am
|
Reply
521
|
In The VIP
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
HOW ABOUT THOSE GIANTS !!!!!!!!!!!
|
02-03-08 07:20pm
|
Reply
522
|
Pier 999
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
They seem to have all their updates back up. You can check for Euro site update covers at theNUDEdoteu
|
02-02-08 06:04pm
|
Reply
523
|
Bums In Action
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
The one guy on the preview page looks like Charles Manson! What a nasty looking site!
|
02-02-08 07:46am
|
Reply
524
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Sex is a biological term, there is no such thing as "anal sex", call it anal copulation or sodomy if you will. Remember what Mia Farrow wrote about Frank Sinatra? She said he was always bugging her for it, and she left him because she thought he was more interested in having a boy than a woman!
|
02-02-08 07:40am
|
Reply
525
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Thanks Drooler, I'll check it out.
|
02-02-08 05:05am
|
