| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
476
|
N/A
|
Reply of
plan b's Poll
Ah hackey sack, reminds me of high school.
|
04-24-13 01:43pm
|
Reply
477
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Excellent thesis, friend
|
04-24-13 01:42pm
|
Reply
478
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Porn is big business no matter how you cut it. That means clout which will keep things about were they are maybe a little less strict.
|
04-24-13 01:42pm
|
Reply
479
|
Mandingo Mama
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
You probably are right, and i've been too generous. Especially considering the few number of videos and the relative short length of them.
I think in general I am too generous with sites. I know that someone's work is important and personal to them (especially in this business) so I try to be respectful of that. Perhaps I give too much into that impulse.
I thank you for calling me out when I stray too far. You are one of the individuals I keep in mind when I'm reviewing (my friend graymane is another).
|
04-23-13 05:58pm
|
Review
480
|
Mandingo Mama
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lady D operates another site and there she says she's in her early 60s. On this site there's no reference, but she is very attractive no matter how old she is
- Weekly updates to pix and videos. A commentator said other wise in March, but as of this review there is newly posted content 1/week.
- good mix of group, one-on-one, interracial, girl/girl and solo action, cuckolding, gangbangs.
- dedicated camera man so you go where the action is
- network of sites included (however most of them are small and suffer from the same poor quality video/pictures) |
| Cons: |
- Only about 30 videos. Many videos are incomplete they start well into the action and finish with obvious content not included.
- About 100 picture sets with about 15 pix in each set.
- organization is only chronological and layout is poor (reminds me of late 90s web development.)
- videos are 480X360 1.5 mbps; which makes me thing all this was filmed a while ago and just doled out weekly.
- no real way to interact with Lady D (just email)
- no zip downloads available.
- videos are only .wmv |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is part of a network but it's really not very good. The same models maintain multiple sites with different content in them - so it looks like you're getting more than you are. Finding all of the videos you like by a model is a pain.
The other site Lady D operates mature sex heaven is much better (it's also included with a membership to whoringoutmywife.com). But I haven't found much her to like. The sex is hot, I really wish they'd put some resources into this site - maybe even go back and re-encode some of it, but right now it is not worth a membership. The lack of quality and quantity are abysmal. Granted I got a year membership to the network for $30, but I hardly spend any time looking around because the quality is so poor and the navigation is worse.
Lady D is hot no doubt about that. She has great sex on camera that would burn up your screen, if you could see it that is :( |
|
04-22-13 03:51pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
481
|
Candy Christopher
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
It kills me 'cause I try to focus on the positive, and as I've mentioned in other posts, I think I'm too easy as a reviewer.
But this site is awfully dated. Which is a shame cause I think the passion across the network is there and would make great porn, if only they would invest in it.
Here's hoping to seeing a lightyear's worth of improvement :)
|
04-20-13 09:59am
|
Reply
482
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I agree with otoh. If there not trying to trick me and there's enough content sure. I'd be sure to mention the lack of updates in my review.
Honesty is my only requirement.
|
04-19-13 01:20pm
|
Review
483
|
Candy Christopher
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Candy is a hot MILF who loves sex - that really comes across. She has an easy smile and laugh and is very charming. She is truly photogenic
- a lot of interracial content (I don't care one way or the other, but know it will be either a big plus or big minus to some). There are some shoots with her husband so it's not exclusively ir.
- Mix of content: fisting squirting, masterbation, cream pie, etc. it's anything but boring
- Nice price: right now there is a special to pick up the whole network for $30/year. |
| Cons: |
- Much of the content is shared with Candy's other site cuckoldmyhusband.com. Since there isn't much content to begin with that's a serious problem. In addition both sites are part of the same network which in it's advertising counts them separately. Granted there are differences but these sites really should just be merged.
- just over 70 videos. Most are under 15 minutes
- pictures are not available as .zip
- picture quality is 300X200.
- organization is clean but basic. There's no search or tagging functions. However with such slim pickings there isn't much of a need :(
- 480X360 0.3 mbps is got to be the lowest quality video I've ever seen. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a bear bones site, which is a shame cause there's certainly potential here. I have a hard time excusing only having such limited content when you've been in business so long. The poor quality and the lack of content are unforgivable.
When I joined there was a deal, 1 year for 30$. So my expectations were low. I certainly was not surprised with what I got.
Even at such a low price I wouldn't recommend. The convoluted organization makes doing these reviews a chore - but I figure if anyone searches for these sites they'll at least benefit from my experience |
|
04-17-13 02:13pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
484
|
MistressT.net
(0)
|
|
04-17-13 11:29am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
485
|
Puba
(0)
|
|
04-17-13 11:13am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
486
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
I agree I'm more turned on by real women. It makes me crazy when a site has models that all look like "Barbie."
|
04-17-13 11:11am
|
Reply
487
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I used to only join sites with member reviews. However over the last few month I've realized someone has to be the 1st so I've become more comfortable jumping in (if the preview section is good enough).
I've have once joined a site that did not have an adequate preview and regretted it.
|
04-17-13 11:09am
|
Reply
488
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Buckhead's Review
Nice review and welcome to PU. I'm also a fan of NA and try to rejoin every year or so to check out the latest. I agree they are formulaic and vanilla - but sometimes that's just right.
|
04-17-13 05:40am
|
Reply
489
|
N/A
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Perfectly said the hottest porn is always the stuff that gets the model off (the less acting the better). Fisting doesn't seem to be enjoyable. Amazing what the human body is capable of; but not pleasurable.
I too went with "not my cup of tea" (who I am I to judge what turns you on) - but like you not for me.
|
04-13-13 08:30am
|
Comment
490
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
|
04-12-13 06:26pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
491
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Comment
Thanks hodaythink. I like checking out NA every few month, maybe I'll grab this while I can!
|
04-12-13 02:27pm
|
Reply
492
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I join sites for video not pix so for me I need to see that the quality (not necessarily resolution) will be there.
|
04-11-13 02:38pm
|
Reply
493
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Nah those damn 'bot may take my job; but damn it no body beat me at schnookering!
|
04-10-13 04:40pm
|
Reply
494
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I certainly take price into account. If two sites have fill a similar niche, with similar quality doesn't the less expensive site deserve to have that noted and their score bumped? Conversely if a site is gauging shouldn't that also be noted?
To me I think it's all part of writing a fair review. Fair to the webmaster and to the potential customers.
|
04-10-13 04:39pm
|
Comment
495
|
Used White Wives
(0)
|
|
04-07-13 06:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
496
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
There's such a variety in reviews that it's hard to answer; like RustyJ said, some do it well others not so much. I think another site that does a good job with previews in manojob and naughtyamerica.com
I'm not looking for them to give away the farm - just want to know if what you have is what I want
|
04-06-13 02:39pm
|
Reply
497
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
What's wrong with Zombaio? I've never had a problem with them, but I think this is the only site I've ever used them with.
|
04-05-13 01:38pm
|
Reply
498
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I leave my asleep rebooting once a week.
|
04-03-13 04:11pm
|
Reply
499
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I used a manager years ago in the dial-up days but haven't thought too once broadband and modern browsers took hold.
What are the best ones for a mac, maybe I should look again?
|
04-02-13 05:09pm
|
Reply
500
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
That's the right attitude and mine too. Never be afraid to try something. How's that for philosophy?
|
04-02-13 05:06pm
|
