| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2826
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
My thoughts exactly...
|
01-30-11 03:10pm
|
Reply
2827
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
Having the additional content really makes PornStar Network an excellent value. I'm not really sure how much VideosZ content you get through PSN, but it took me over a month to download everything I wanted. It at least doubles the amount of content on the network and its all free when you join through TBP or PU. I'll post a full review of PSN this week. It's a decent site and I'd highly recommend it.
|
01-30-11 10:52am
|
Comment
2828
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
|
01-29-11 06:29am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
2829
|
Brain Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
PornGirl's Reply
Thanks for your assistance with this! I'm one satisfied customer and fellow PUs and real-life porn buddies will be told about this. You have an excellent site and the customer service is first rate. Again, thanks.
|
01-06-11 04:42pm
|
Reply
2830
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Mel Torme gets my vote! Oh wait... I'll get back to you on that...
|
01-05-11 07:01pm
|
Reply
2831
|
Brain Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
PSN Master's Reply
Thanks for the reply. Just a quick question though - does the $20 membership give TBP members the ability to download the Moviez files? I can stream them, but when I try to download I get kicked to the screen that requires the $30 upgrade.
|
01-05-11 10:45am
|
Reply
2832
|
Brain Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
PornGirl's Reply
PornGirl - I sent an email to you from my Hotmail account. The message comes from Rear Admiral.
Thanks
|
12-30-10 01:19pm
|
Reply
2833
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
drphil's Reply
I will. I also contacted pat362 who wrote a review and while he didn't like the site for subjective reasons, he didn't have the problems you did. I might take the plunge...
|
12-29-10 07:07pm
|
Reply
2834
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks Pat.
|
12-29-10 01:48pm
|
Reply
2835
|
Cherry Petite
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I didn't know she did some ALS Scan stuff. Thanks for the tip. I'll have to check the stuff I have from them and see if I downloaded any of her. I hope I did.
|
12-28-10 05:55am
|
Reply
2836
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Pat - Thanks for the prompt reply. I am thinking about joining the site. I read yur review and I know what I'm in for. I like some of this stuff, and I know you've probably read some of my past reviews of sites like The Training of O. I like sites where women are submissive, but I also like it where the male dominance isn't over the top. In the Kink sites (The Training of O, Public Discrgace, etc.) it is pretty clear that there is no real abuse going on. That's important to me. Rough sex is one thing, but abusive sex is another. As a fellow Canuck, I'm sure you'll understand the issue that hockey may be a ROUGH game, but it doesn't have to be VIOLENT. That might apply here too.
One other question - do you remember having any problem cancelling your mmembership?
|
12-27-10 08:29pm
|
Reply
2837
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Pat - how did you find the download speeds at Facial Abuse? Some people posted comments that it was really slow and those comments were posted before your review. I'm wondering if that got resolved.
Thanks!
|
12-27-10 06:19pm
|
Reply
2838
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
drphil's Comment
drphil - did this ever get resolved? I'd like to join this site but your comments and some from others are a pretty big red flag.
Thanks!
|
12-27-10 06:01pm
|
Reply
2839
|
Brain Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Reply
Thanks for your help sorting this out Ken.
|
12-27-10 02:45pm
|
Reply
2840
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Same for me.
|
12-26-10 07:53am
|
Reply
2841
|
Lethal Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
insomniacxxx's Review
Thanks for the useful review. This site seems to be just another in a long line of studio sites that are poorly done. I've wondered before why a studio wouldn't put a better effort into getting their products into the hands of paying customers.
|
12-26-10 07:52am
|
Comment
2842
|
Brain Pass
(0)
|
|
12-25-10 08:34am
Replies (8)
|
Reply
2843
|
Cherry Petite
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
I'm glad you found it useful. She also has a small site under the name "Cherry Potter" on the PornStar Network. If you join that through TBP you get the membership for $20. her pics there are available in zips.
|
12-25-10 08:11am
|
Comment
2844
|
Brain Pass
(0)
|
|
12-20-10 06:14pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
2845
|
Cherry Petite
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
PinkPanther: thanks for the tip on this. I tried searching her other aliases on Google (she has several) and to my surprise she has a Cherry Potter site as part of the Brain Pass network. And to make things better (for me, anyway) there appear to be a few anal scenes.
So I'm off to get a membership...
Thanks again for the tip.
|
12-19-10 10:29am
|
Reply
2846
|
Cherry Petite
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Boob-job!!!!! Nooooooooo!!!!!!
Please hold all calls for the rest of the afternoon. I'll be crying quietly here...
|
12-19-10 10:24am
|
Review
2847
|
Cherry Petite
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Very beautiful and petite model
- Mix of softcore and hardcore
- Full trial with low price
- Decent quality videos and pictures
- Good download speeds |
| Cons: |
- Smallish site (89 video scenes, 49 photo sets)
- No longer updating
- Beware of pre-checked cross-sells
- No zips for the photos
- No HD option
- Some of the scenes can be a bit repetitive |
| Bottom Line: |
I’m not usually a big fan of solo girl sites, but I’ve always liked other models that I’ve seen from Quebec so I thought I’d give this a try. Cherry Petite is a beautiful young brunette model. She’s petite too, as the name would suggest. She’s done some mainstream stuff under the name Cherry Potter too. She has one scene on Videobox under the name Sherry Potter.
The most recent of her videos seem to be a lot more tame than the ones she posted back when she first started her website. The later videos are mostly just a bit of tease and some masturbation as she lies on a bed. The camera is on a tripod so there is not much variety in the shots. Personally, I find these videos a bit boring and repetitive. As you work your way back into the older videos they certainly get more daring. I was pleasantly surprised to see some girl/girls play and some hardcore boy/girl scenes, some with just oral, some with vaginal sex. There is no anal. There are also some videos that can be classified as public nudity or exhibitionism. These and the hardcore scenes make this a much better site than if all she had were softcore videos. There are 89 videos on the site of varying length. The last video update was in October, 2008. The videos are 720x480 resolution. There is a lower resolution available but I didn’t try that. The download speeds were better than I have seen at other similar sites. If I was downloading only one file I would see speeds between 1.2 and 1.5 MB/sec.
There are pictures too. I’m not big into pictures but I would probably have downloaded all of them since I really like Cherry’s look. But there is a major flaw on the site: there is no option to download a zip. There are 49 photo sets of varying sizes. The last photo set update was in June 2007.
Obviously the site isn’t updating any more. IAFD lists Cherry as having left the business in 2007.
So is Cherry Petite worth the membership? If you like her look, then it is. 89 videos and 49 photo sets isn’t a small site for a solo model. There is enough variety in the videos and photos to keep it interesting. What makes it a great value though is that it offers a full trial for two days at $2.95. The site is small enough that you could easily download the stuff you want in two days. I cancelled my trial membership early to ensure that I’d have no problems doing so and the membership stayed active until the end of the two days. One problem to note is that there is a pre-checked cross-sell on the sign-up page. I missed it. Don’t make the same mistake because it took me over an hour to cancel that to avoid a full membership being triggered. |
|
12-19-10 07:08am
Replies (7)
|
Comment
2848
|
Peter Girls
(0)
|
|
12-18-10 07:22am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2849
|
Peter Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I suspect that part of it is that the network seems to be run pretty much by one guy. One very lucky guy! It does seem odd to not offer zips though. That is pretty much expected for photos now.
|
12-18-10 07:20am
|
Review
2850
|
POV Porn
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Good quality POV scenes
- Part of a bigger (but relatively small) network
- Mostly amateur models
- Some porn stars, before they were stars
- Good selection of scenes
- Updates (I’m unsure of the schedule though)
- Pictures (but no zips)
- The scenes aren’t over-produced; they have a ‘fun’ feel to them
- Good value when joining at the TPB / PU price |
| Cons: |
- Download speeds aren’t up to industry standards |
| Bottom Line: |
Two things to start: 1) this review pretty much applies entirely to Peter Girls too. They are part of the same network. POVPorn.com is hardcore-themed, while Peter Girls is more softcore, with some oral and handjobs. 2) I wouldn’t normally submit two reviews for a network, but I joined through Lap Dance Gone Bad which turned out to be just a small secondary network site. POVPorn.com and Peter Girls are the main sites and deserve a separate review.
I drafted this review a few days ago but didn’t post it. I’m glad I gave it some time since I’ve completely changed my position on this after watching many of the scenes again. This review may be a lot more subjective than I’d usually write. I really like this network. Peter Romero makes some excellent porn. It isn’t technically superior, but that adds to some of the amateur allure. He reminds me of the early days of gonzo porn when it was being shaped by guys like John Stagliano and Joey Silvera. This porn looks like it was fun to make, and that makes it fun to watch too. (Peter – If you read this, PLEASE make more Lap Dance Gone Bad scenes! That is an under-served niche.)
It is difficult to say precisely how many scenes are on this one site because there is a lot of cross-linking between the two main sites. The sites appear to date back to 2001 and some of the scenes date back to then. Needless to say, the quality of those scenes is low as was the standard then. Most of the older scenes are also broken into smaller files. Between the two sites there are easily over a hundred scenes. The site says they update frequently and they do update though I’m not certain as to the schedule. The newer scenes are available in three sizes, with the best being 3300kbps. Download speeds aren’t up to industry standards. Average speeds are 250KB/sec. I can report that the medium quality scenes (1000kbps, 640x480) look good.
There are also photos available for most of the scenes, but there is no option for zips.
The best feature of the site is the models that they have. The site is not skewed to professional porn models, though some are here. Of those, most of them seem to appear very early in their careers. For example, Taryn Thomas appears in 2004 (her career began that year) as Brynne. It’s fun to see her and others so fresh in the early days of her career. Many of the other models are unknown to me and appear to be true amateurs.
I’m not a big fan of the POV genre, but Peter makes it work and is able to capture the action well without making himself the star of the scene or shaking the camera so badly that the scene is unwatchable. For POV, this is well done.
Joining the network through TPB / PU gets you a reduced price. For that price you get some really decent porn. It has a true amateur feel to it – and I mean that in a good sense. If you like amateurs, porn stars before they were stars or POV, this site is worth a membership. |
|
12-18-10 07:18am
Replies (0)
|
