REVIEW(CONTINUED):
You get access to around 17 sites. The most valuable site in the network is the Nubiles.net site, which I've said is like an encyclopedia of young porn starlets early in their careers.
Many of the sites stopped updating years ago. Which is common for many porn networks: it takes too much money, time, effort and talent to update each site in a large network.
But the network does a fine job finding attractive teens to film and photograph.
In spite of the covid epidemic, the network updates with 1 new video and matching photoset, on average, every 2 days.
I'm giving the network a score of 93. The network is not perfect, but it's an excellent source of teen porn.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The network is mainly teen-oriented content (which you should figure from the name: a nubile is a sexually attractive young woman).
Although you do get a smattering of MILFs to guide the teens into discovering the joys of sex).
-You get around 17 sites in the network, covering different niches. Stepfamily incest, blowjobs, vaginal and anal sex, bad teens punished, role playing where the young teens seduce or get seduced by step-brothers, step-fathers, step-mothers.
-Most of the videos and photosets from the last several years feature crysal clear videos and photosets.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Content is exclusive.
Cons:
-Nubiles Porn network has content going back to at least 2004. So the definition of the older material is lower than more recent content. For example, videos from 2004 are 270p or 360p, which is below the standards that most PU members want. But if that's all that is available for the older content of these teen starlets, be thankful that it's still available. Many sites delete their older content from years ago, which means that content has gone to internet hell.
-Many of the sites at Nubiles Porn stopped updating years ago. So there's no fresh content at these sites. Which is a shame, because there are new models coming out every year, and all you get at these archive sites is old content. And the site themes of some of these sites were fresh and interesting.
-The site (and network) is teen orientated. There are a few older models (MILFs), but the majority of the models are teens or early twenties. Mainly white, slender girls. Many PU members want a mix of ages, races, body types.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
This network is basically slender white teens. Not a con for me, but PU members often comment they want a mix of model types.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. You have to un-check the cross-sale, or make sure to cancel the cross-sale before it turns into an expensive membership.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Nubiles Porn is one of the finest porn networks on the internet.
There are several factors that make it a wonderful network:
-1. The mix of attractive teen models, many of them just starting their porn career.
Edit: many teen models last for 1 or 2 years, but some models can last for 10 years or more.
I'm guessing that the models that focus on glamour usually last longer.
There are some hardcore models that do both glamour and hardcore that have been around for 10 or more years, that have built up a strong fan-base. But those are the minority.
-2.Navigation is easy. The sites are laid out logically, making it easy to find and load/download the content you want.
-3. Good search engine. The search returns results from the site you are logged into, not the network as a whole. That is good and bad: good, because it forces you to be aware which site you are logged into. Bad, because you have to navigate to each site to see the model's content at the network, which makes for extra work.
-4. The photosets and videos are old-school simple: Not glamor style, but not cheap porn. The sets are ok, the youth of the models (this is a teen-oriented network) and their natural good-looks are presented simply.
-5. The nubiles.net site is the crown jewel of the network. It's like an encyclopedia of porn teen starlets early in their career, with over 2,400 models.
-6. The Best Porn review, and comments by some PU members, state that Nubiles.net is not included in a Nubiles Porn membership. This is wrong. Nubiles.net is included in every Nubiles Porn membership. And vice versa. A Nubiles.net membership gives you access to the Nubiles Porn network. The problem is that Nubiles Porn does not prominently display the Nubiles.net site. You have to use the drop-down menu which lists your membership sites to see (and login) to the Nubiles.net site.
Alternatively, you can use your Nubiles Porn login details to login directly to the Nubiles.net site.
-PU gives you a discounted membership to Nubiles Porn. $19.94/month recurring, instead of $29.32/month. Or $99.95/year instead of $199/year. I got a membership for $84/year. Holiday discounts are offered throughout the year.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-I'm looking at a video at the Nubiles.net site, titled "Hardcore", posted Jan 22, 2008.
The model is Kadence, a cute 18-year-old blonde model, and the stunt cock is probably Timo Hardy (aka Alexander Sorel, Sergio, Timur Hardy, Timur, Timothy, Paul, George Vaugn).
He used to be one of the main stunt cocks at Teen Mega World network and at a bunch of other porn sites, along with his brother (or cousin?), Oliver Strelly (who was also a major stunt cock with over 900 scenes).
In the video, Timo has short brown hair. Most of the time I've seen him he had a shaved head, and he appeared in well over 800 porn videos for many different porn sites from around 2006 through 2014. The reason I mention him is because I used to be irritated he was in so many porn videos. I thought he was brutal to the teen girls he fucked. It wasn't over-the-top brutality featured on some extreme sites, just slightly rough sex where he slapped the girl's face and ass, twisted the girl's arms, and rammed her pussy and ass and mouth. But the models seemed to enjoy it. It's been years since I've seen him in any videos, but in the 2008 video, he seemed so young, it brought back memories of how much I disliked him for his rough treatment of the models.
But after viewing porn for years, and seeing some of the rough sex that is now being featured at some porn sites, I realize I was mistaken: maybe the girls really did enjoy his rough treatment of them. Or maybe they only smiled because they were told to smile.
I thought Timo was a thug. But I did respect that he had the vigor and endurance to give these girls strong orgasms. He was like a fucking sex machine.
I've said the Nubiles Porn network is an excellent network. You get your money's worth. Make sure you visit the Nubiles.net site, which is included, to browse through the lovely models.
The individual sites in Nubiles Porn network cover a variety of niches: fake incest (sex between members of a blended family), lesbian, petite teen girls, punishment of bad teen girls, role play where ballerinas get fucked, role play where teens and teachers fuck, role play where stunt cocks hunt down runaway teens, etc.
A lot of the plots are flimsy, and the acting skills of most of the models are poor. Most of the models are very attractive, so shut down your brain and try to enjoy the naked flesh on view.
CONTINUED IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW:
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Note: although I think this site in one of the finest glamcore sites in the internet, the network has been hard hit by the covid epidemic. The network update rate has been slowed to around 10 new scenes per month. You're wasting your money if you buy a membership longer than 1 or 2 months here.
PROS(START OF):
-The main pro is this is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet.
-Site has 320 scenes. They are refreshing the site with new content.
-The content is exclusive. Aside from tube sites (and torrent sites), which seem to copy almost all porn sites, I've never seen any scenes from this site. I don't use torrent sites, but I do look at PornHub to see new models and find sites I might want to join.
-The selection of models is among the finest of the internet. They also appear at the Wow network, Metart network, X-Art and other fine sites, but when appearing at The White Boxxx, their scenes are like glamorous, erotic movies.
A short list of some of the models featured:
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
Cherry Kiss, Jia Lissa, Lena Reif, Lika Star, Liya Silver, Lya Missy, Oxana Chic, Sabrisse, the list of attractive models goes on and on. And the site presents them as lovely as any movie star.
-You can sort the movie listing by newest movies, most popular, most viewed, runtime.
-Movies have a trailer, and a short text description, as well as tags.
-You can stream and/or download videos in your choice of 240p through 1080p.
-There is no download limit for photosets. But the photosets are tiny, 10-14 photos per set.
-PU has a discounted price of $14.95/month. Or a yearly price of $130. But I paid $80/year. Maybe I got a holiday discount?
-There is a link on each video to skip the intro section, which is useful, after you've wasted time watching the same intro again and again.
-You can switch the language the site/network displays.
Site can display in Deutsch, English, Espanol, Francais, Italiano, and more.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are basically minor.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
This is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet.
I say the cons are basically minor, because I'm so impressed with how lovely these models are.
If the models weren't so fucking gorgeous, the cons would irritate me more.
-Irregular update rate. You get one new update per week, approximately. Many sites have taken to reposting older content shot years ago, but this site is still putting out new content.
-You have a download limit of 100 videos per month. This is your limit for the entire network, not just for a single site in the network.
Which means, you will probably need to stay a member for at least two months, to get all the videos you want to collect.
-The photosets are limited to around 10 to 14 photos per set. That is a damn shame, since many of these models are absolutely gorgeous, or at least presented at their finest, and these models deserve a full set of at least 100+ photos per set.
-There is a splash page of ads, and ads on every member page.
-I wish there was a model listing for each site. Instead, you have a model text listing for the entire network. And it's cumbersome to click through the pages of the thumbnail listing of the scenes, looking for the models/scenes you want to view.
-No 4K scenes. Which is surprising for a glamour site.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Why do I call this the finest glamcore site on the internet?
They make it an art form to present attractive models in the best light possible. They start with girls who are naturally attractive, then use makeup, wonderful lighting, expensive sets to showcase how lovely these models can be. The girls are doing hardcore porn, so you would normally expect a gritty aspect to the scenes: but not here.
It's like these girls are beautiful angels who came down to earth to show men (and sometimes other women) the heavenly delights of sex: heaven is not a sterile place where everyone spends their time singing the praises of the Lord, but a place where, if you are lucky enough to go up instead of down, you can taste the pleasures of heavenly sex. And that's why they are singing: to proclaim the incredible joy of fucking these women.
But if you're gay, there's probably a section in heaven for gay men.
And for all the other varieties of gender that are clamoring to be heard.
The first video I saw at The White Boxxx was a video of Lena Reif.
Let me quote from a review I did on 07-18-19:
"Watching Lena Reif's breasts sway as she moves is watching poetry in motion, in the video titled "Her First Threesome", where Lena Reif and Shona River give stunt cock Lutro a ride to remember.
That was the first video I watched at the site, and that video alone, is worth the membership price to the network."
I stand by that statement. That one video, by itself, is worth the membership price to the network. I've seen other videos of Lena Reif, at other sites. She's been featured at the Wow network, Metart network, Adult Time, Vixen network, etc. But at The White Boxxx, in this video, she's like an angel come to earth. Absolutely gorgeous.
It's like the difference between file mignon and low-grade hamburger.
She might be attractive at other sites, in other photosets or videos, but in this one video, she is fucking gorgeous.
Bottom line summary:
The main draw of the site is the care they take to present the attractive models as gorgeously as possible.
I mean these are hardcore scenes, and yet the models are fucking lovely.
The sex is mainly slow and sensual, but the scene lighting, the sets, the makeup, the expert camera-work that focuses on the lovely bodies of these models, just add up to one of the finest glamcore sites on the internet.
I'm not saying the site is perfect.
One PU member complained that he was having internet connection problems, couldn't download videos. And he reported that site support was slow to correct the problem.
I've used site support, and had no problem reaching them through email.
Email is slower than telephone or live chat, but that's all there is for support.
I've only used support a couple of times. I had to wait a few days for a response, but any problems I had were resolved.
But if I had a slow internet connection, and couldn't stream or download what I wanted, that would be a deal breaker and I would cancel my sub.
But, thankfully, I've never had a real problem at the network that wasn't resolved fairly soon.
So I'm giving the site (with network access) a score of 90.
The girls are presented as gorgeous creatures.
The sex is slow and sensual.
I've seen a few scenes at other sites where the sex could be hotter: Pure Taboo, Teen Fidelity, Rocco Siffredi.
But for glamcore sites, where the models are presented as gorgeous creatures, The White Boxxx is the finest site I've seen.
If they increased the update rate for the network, once the covid epidemic is past, I would increase the score.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Good update rate: they add a new photoset or video every day or every other day.
-Video and photoset quality is outstanding.
-The selection of models is very good. I would rate the Metart, MetartX, Love Hairy (all part of the Metart network) as more attractive, but I doubt any PU member would kick any of these girls out of his or her bed.
-In the last few years, the site has focused on two girls getting it on,
or solo masturbation. The girls (late teens, twenties) are attractive, but I would rate Love Hairy and MetartX models slightly above the VivThomas models. Let me explain: how a model is photographed can make a huge difference in how attractive she appears. Also, you have more control over a model's appearance in a photograph than in a video, more control over the lighting, use of cosmetics, photoshopping, etc. And in my opinion, even if the same model appears at all 3 sites, her appearance at Love Hairy and MetartX is usually better than her appearance at Viv Thomas.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
They say that beauty is in the eye of the beholder: but the photographer can make a huge difference in a model's appearance: with lighting, setting, cosmetics, photoshopping, etc.
One of the finest sites for making a model appear glamourous is The White Boxxx, which makes an art of making attractive models appear like movie stars, even when they are doing hardcore sex.
-Content is exclusive.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
CONS(START OF):
-Viv Thomas is an excellent site. The cons are minor.
Navigation is easy. The content (films and galleries) have extensive tags that make finding the content that appeals to your tastes easy. The model index is good: oversized headshots of the models. But even though these are attractive to beautiful women, the headshots often don't emphasize their beauty. The staff, or whoever is responsible to making these headshots, need to re-photograph the model's headshots to show how lovely they can be.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
They need to sell the beauty of the models. Appearance or presentation is vitally important in a glamour site.
-Viv Thomas is a stand-alone site. It's part of the Metart network, but membership in Viv Thomas does not give you access to any other site in the Metart network.
-You do get access to the Metart live cam shows, but that that's standard with any Metart network site. And they really push the live cam shows, with ads on every member page.
-Like many or most Metart network sites, you can buy individual photosets and videos, even if you're not a member. But the prices are not cheap. A better way to download the photosets and videos is to join for a month: much cheaper, especially if you want to download more than a few sets.
-They advertise daily updates. But the update rate is really every 1 or 2 days.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
Number of films: 2,123
Number of galleries: 3,322
Number of models: 1,095
Number of contributing photographers: 36
Most of the models are attractive, and many are familiar from other sites in the Metart network.
-Viv Thomas was started by Viv Thomas around 2000, so it been around over 20 years now.
The Metart people took over the site in 2014. Domai, which started around 1997, used a simpler style of female solo nudity. And then Goddess Nudes was started by the same founder of DOMAI a few years later, to create a slightly edgier site. DOMAI and Goddess Nudes were added to the Metart network when the founder's age made running the sites increasingly difficult.
All 3 sites were famous for the quality of the content. Although the Viv Thomas site was much more sexual, with solo, lesbian, and boy-girl content. DOMAI and Goddess Nudes were mainly simple solo female model sets.
Once Metart took over the sites, they slowly changed the site structures into the Metart network style, to make navigation easier and to add the frills that the Metart network sites are known for.
Photosets are available for streaming and downloading in 3 definitions.
You can control how the photosets are displayed on your monitor: resolution, number of thumbnails displayed per page, slideshow interval time, whether comments are displayed or hidden, sort order for films and galleries, etc.
You also get the standard blog for the Metart network, tailored to the Viv Thomas site.
Large, well-photographed photos of one or two lovely models, with a link to a short erotic fiction based on the gallery or film displayed.
Viv Thomas is basically a fine site: easy to use, good customer support (but telephone and live chat service would be faster than email support), good erotic content for solo masturbation and two-girl lesbian sex.
I'm giving the site a score of 91. It's an excellent site, and PU has a discounted membership price of $20/month. Or $100/year, if you're into lesbian sex.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Metart network. Excellent layout, easy navigation, all the bells and whistles of a first-rate glamour site.
-The quality of the models is the gold or platinum standard: lovely young women in their late teens or twenties.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Daily updates.
-Photosets go up to 720p, 1080p, 4K.
-Customer support is 24/7 by email. (No phone or live chat support.)
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-There is a blog, where you have a small photo (or very large-sized thumbnail) of different models, with a link to an erotic short story. The photos are clear, crisp images of these lovely young models, with a bit of erotic fiction to get you off.
-There are trailers for the videos, to give you a preview of the video.
-But the photosets and videos also have extensive tags, to describe them, that you can use for searching for content that interests you.
-No DRM. But most sites have stopped using DRM many years ago.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-If you're not a site member, you can buy individual photosets and videos. But that is expensive, and a one-month membership would be a cheaper option.
-PU discount to the site membership, $20/month, or $100/yearly. But sometimes you can find a holiday special for a lower price.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are basically minor. This is a first-rate glamour site that showcases lovely young women masturbating. The women are are absolutely lovely.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Some PU members complain that almost all the models are slender, white, teen-or-early twenty models. They want more diversity in age, body type, race, whatever.
-The site favors girls with natural attributes. Some PU members (some people will always complain, no matter what happens) want girls with tattoos, implants, piercings, harder edge to the sex, for variety.
Note: if a girl does have tattoos, the site usually erases them with photoshop in the photosets.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-No bonus sites included. You get the Metartx site, and access to the live chat shows, which is standard for any Metart network site. But I'm not into live chat shows, too afraid I will get hooked and start spending serious money on these shows.
-The model index lists a few stats for the model, but almost no bio data:
The stats given include: eye color, hair color, height, weight, breast size, pubic hair style(shaved, trimmed, natural), ethnicity.
-The canned music at the start of the videos is annoying. Better if they deleted the music track.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site theme: beautiful girls masturbating. You can think of this site as Metart (which is mainly softcore) with orgasm. Metart is mainly solo girl content, although there are sets with two or more girls. But it's strictly softcore.
Metartx is mainly solo girls masturbating. Some sets and videos have 2 girls. Masturbation could be considered mid-core or hardcore, depending on who you talk to.
Site stats:
Videos: 1,019
Video runtime: 10-20 minutes
Photosets: 830
Models: 306
Photographers: 40
The main draw to the site is how fucking lovely the models are.
And that the girls are masturbating, instead of the softcore solo action of nude modelling at Metart.
This site is what Playboy should have developed. Instead, Playboy magazine stopped their print magazine, and Playboy today is mainly a brand name that is remembered for its past glory from the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s.
I'm a sucker for lovely young women. And if they put on a show while mastubating, that only makes it better. Over time, since there is little or no plot, the sex can lose its impact.
But the girls are so lovely, the photography and videos shot with high quality film, nice settings: the girls are not just lovely, but adorable .
You get beautiful girls naked. The action is not rough or over-the-top, but sensual. You could say it's couple-friendly, but solo friendly, as well. Although the perfect solution would be for Metart X to send samples of these models to your home to see if they really match the fantasies they create in your mind.
Basically, as I already stated, Metart X focuses on solo girls masturbating. So it's a more erotic, more sensual site than Metart, with many of the same fine models. Many of the bells and whistles of a top-tier glamor site. A one-month membership is definitely worth your while at $20, or a cheaper membership if you can catch one on a holiday discount.
I'm giving the site a score of 90, because the girls are so lovely, the quality of the videos and photosets is outstanding, and the site is easy to use.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Love Hairy is part of the Metart network. So you can expect the fine technical features of the Metart sites: Logical site structure, with easy navigation.
-Photosets have 3 main definitions: small, medium, large, with a zip file for each definition.
-The membership is inexpensive: $7.99/month, or $60/year. I don't know if this is a PU discounted price, or the regular price.
-The model listing can be sorted by alphabet or ratings (ratings by the members). The model listing is oversized thumbnails that give you a very good look at the model's face.
-Support is 24/7. This is email support. I don't believe Love Hairy support has live chat or a phone service.
-Excellent search engine.
-Lots of tags to explain/support the content(photosets and videos). Can use them to search for items of interest. But I prefer to use the model index, myself.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Nice photo player for streaming photosets.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Metart support watches the PU site, and often responds to reviews and comments about the Metart network with helpful suggestions and information.
CONS(START OF):
-Site content is not exclusive. All or most of the content has previously been posted at other sites in the Metart network.
-There are 172 videos, but the overwhelming amount of content is photos. You have 1,253 photosets. So the site is more for photo lovers than video lovers.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-They advertise daily updates, but the real update rate is very irregular. Probably because of the covid epidemic.
Bottom Line:
The site is a depository of models who have pubic hair.
The modern trend is for models to have no hair on their pubic area.
Except that some people prefer the older style where women did not shave their pussies clean.
Call it a fetish to prefer women with pubic hair. Or call it the natural look. Except even when it was normal for softcore porn to have women with pubic hair, the pubic hair was normally groomed or manicured.
A few models might have armpit hair, or hair on their legs, but those would be a definite minority. The site focuses on women with pubic hair.
Most men seem to prefer the clean-shaven pubic area on women, from the comments I've read at the Metart sites I visit.
Unless a women has a forest growing down between her legs, I think pubic hair can look attractive.
And the models at Love Hairy are definitely worth viewing. They are among some of the most beautiful women in the world. The Metart sites have, for over 20 years, been showcasing attractive teens and slightly older women.
The Love Hairy is more focused on photosets than videos, but you get both.
1,253 photosets. 172 videos. 490 models. 151 contributing photographers.
With a large number of photographers, you get to sample their different styles, although the basic approach is glamour photography.
If you're familiar with Metart.com, the main site in the Metart network, you will have seen most of the models at Love Hairy. The models at Love Hairy range from attractive to gorgeous.
You have hundreds of the loveliest women in the world featured here.
Go to the public pages of Love Hairy, and page through the model listing, and I believe you will agree with me. The thumbnails are mostly headshots, but many of these women could have been finalists in any major beauty contest in the world. They are that attractive.
This is psychological. And maybe it only applies to me. But the main Metart site, Metart.com, is too big. It has too much content. I get bored looking through their model listing, in spite of the lovely models. The physical beauty of the models loses its impact.
Although Love Hairy has fewer models (490 models at Love Hairy, versus 3,821 at Metart), and most of the models at Love Hairy also appear at MetArt, I can appreciate the models at Love Hairy more easily.
This is complicated.
Partially, it's because the brain gets overloaded with the huge amount of Metart content: too much of a good thing, and your appreciation starts to dwindle.
Partially, it's because I had a couple of bad experiences at Metart. I used to love the Metart site, even paid for a lifetime membership. But then I made a couple of comments at the site, and got flammed. This is foolish on my part, but I no longer love the site. I thought the Metart membership was supposed to support each other, but it turns out the Metart membership is composed of regular humans, who can be real dickheads at times.
I'm being foolish, and I'm aware of it, but I no longer respect the Metart membership.
I visit the site, since I paid for it, but I no longer look at the site with rose-colored glasses. Metart is a fine site with a lot of great models and great photography, but I no longer love the site.
And I'm reluctant to support any Metart sites with a paid subscription.
End of story.
Bottom line: Love Hairy is a fine site.
You have hundreds of lovely young women.
You have some of the best glamour photographers contributing their work.
You have a low membership price: both monthly, and yearly.
I don't think many PU members would go for a yearly membership, because of the slow update rate. WeAreHairy is a competing site in the hairy niche. It's far more expensive than Love Hairy, and the models are less attractive. But it updates faster, the videos and photosets are exclusive, and PU members seem to prefer it over Love Hairy for satisfying the hairy niche.
The main negative for We Are Hairy is the price: $34.95/month, or $79.95 for 3 months. Which is very expensive.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Sometimes has a special discounted price or $5 for the first month.
Also, even though the ad did not specify any site except Erotica X, it came with access to the other four sites in the X Empire network.
-You get 2 confirming emails on joining. They give you your login details, plus the membership pricing.
-You can choose your username and password, to make remembering them easy.
-They have a nice model index.
-The content is advertised as exclusive.
-Login and member pages are secure (https). So your membership should be secure from hacking, and your ISP has fewer records of your site usage.
-The network has over 1400 videos.
-The site (and network) has an active forum, where you can can interact with other members, models and staff. A lot of the comments seem useless to me: staff congratulating members on earning "Agrees badges"
CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION:
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
(if a member makes a comment, and other members agree with the comment, you can earn a "Agrees badge", or staff congratulating members for "First Anniversary badge", for staying a member for 1 year.
The forum does cover a wide range of dates and issues, and it can give some useful background on the site/network, if you're into historical data on how the network works.
-You do have downloading privileges for the photosets, which download in a zipped file of one definition.
-The photosets are collectible. The photos are focused, well-lit and provide a record of each accompanying video.
-The tags for a video describe the sex action fairly well. There is also a trailer to give you a better idea of the video action.
CONS(START OF):
-Although part of Gamma Entertainment (which owns Adult Time), you don't get access to the Adult Time network.
-The biller and support are not the regular Adult Time entities, but ones I've never heard of.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
But since they are part of Gamma Entertainment, I hope they will be OK.
-The Best Porn states there is a daily download limit of 300GB. But that seems to be a huge amount of data to download, and should not be a problem for most PU members.
-Sometimes you are timed out of the site, and have to solve 2 captcha to re-login.
-Although the confirming join email stated I had streaming and downloading privileges, it turns out I only have streaming privileges for videos. I can download the photosets.
-Slow update rate. The site averages about 2 new scenes per month. Partly the slow update rate can be explained by the covid epidemic, which has halted production for most porn studios.
-Search engine is poor: if you put in the search term "Sadie Blair", it returns videos for Sadie Blair, Chanel Preston, Cherie DeVille, Blair Williams, Edyn Blair.
-Ads on every page. But at the bottom of the page, so not so bad.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Current number of site videos: 347 scenes. The network has around 1,400 scenes.
Average runtime of video: 20-50 minutes.
Each video has a matching photoset.
All videos have the option to stream in 288p (or 360p) through 1080p.
The newer videos posted in the last few years usually have a 4K option.
You can add videos to a favorites list.
You can stream and download your favorite parts of each video, to save the "good parts".
You can play a slideshow of each photoset.
The videos and photosets have tags to help you sort/filter the content.
You can add your own tags, comments and ratings to the videos and photosets.
X Empire network has 5 sites:
All Black X
Dark X Erotica X Hard X
Lesbian X
I joined on a special discounted price of $5.00 for the first month.
The offer stated it was streaming only, with a membership in Erotic X.
It did not mention gaining access to the X Empire network of 5 sites.
However, once I joined and got the confirming emails, the emails stated I had access to streaming and downloading privileges.
Also, that I had access to all 5 sites in the X Empire network.
I don't know whether the ad I joined through was a mistake, or whether the site/network has messed up software, but I was happy to get access to all 5 sites, plus also getting full streaming + downloading privileges for $5 for the first month, recurring at $19.95/month.
Note: after going to the member pages, I found that I had access to all 5 sites in the network.
I could also stream (photoplay) the photosets, and download them.
I could stream the videos, but downloading the videos required a $9.95 upgrade.
So the confirmation video was in error: I did not have downloading privileges for the videos.
Or, you could argue that downloading privileges for the photosets made the downloading claim true.
PU has a discounted price of $14.95 for the first month, recurring at $29.95/month.
That is supposed to give access to the entire X Empire network, with full downloading privileges.
I would classify the videos (and photosets) as heartcore style.
Many of the videos have a plot where there is some problem between the model and the stunt cock: either they are both in other relationships, or they have a problem with each other emotionally. However, the stunt cock is supposed to be a smooth talker, who quickly convinces the model that they are right for each other, and a few kisses turn into sex. So the emotional feelings are supposed to lift the sex into a meaningful scene, where it's not just lust, but yearning and love and glowing sex.
Maybe if Disney opens an X-rated division, they can start making these kinds of films, and put them into the Adult Section of their Disneyland Parks (joke).
The selection of models is good. These are not the extremely attractive teen models of the Wow network, or even the very attractive-on-average teen models of the Teen Mega World network, but normally attractive models in their twenties. The models don't look like porn stars, but look like very attractive regular people. Not glammed up. Just good-looking females in their twenties. The videos and photosets are nice settings, nice furniture, the videos are clear, crisp, well shot and focused.
Maybe I'm bored with porn right now. I thought the videos and photosets were well done. Not outstanding, but well done. I'm not going to pay the $9.95 upgrade fee because I haven't found any special videos I want to collect. And I have so many other fine memberships already, that I don't need the videos from the Erotica X site. I have Adult Time network, the Wow network, and some other sites that are more than enough to add to my collection.
I'm giving the site, with it's access to the X Empire network, a score of 85.
It's a nice site, a nice network. But it doesn't impress me enough to extend my membership past the one month mark.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Fantasy Massage is included in the Adult Time network. So you get access to over 50,000 hard core videos, most of them fine to excellent quality.
-Fantasy Massage has over 2,240 massage videos.
-You get a wide variety of porn stars, in both age, body type, and sex action.
-Login and member pages are secure (https). Less prone to hacking, less records of your usage kept by your ISP.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads. One PU member pointed out that Adult Time has a 300 GB daily limit, but that is a huge data allowance.
-Most videos have a choice of streaming and download definition of 160p through 1080p. But some of the newer videos go up to 4K.
-Most content is exclusive, but some videos might be found on competing sites, such as Teen Mega World (Tricky Masseur), Team Skeet (Rub A Teen), or the Wow network.
-There are accompanying photosets for most videos.
-Fame Support is excellent. It's 24/7, has live chat, email and telephone access.
Cons:
-With over 2,240 videos at Fantasy Massage, and another 50,000+ videos at the rest of the Adult Time network, there's a huge amount of content you have to search through to find the content that appeals to you. Too much of a good thing decreases the value of the site. That's a psychological trait. And the navigation can be messy.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
Bottom Line:
Fantasy Massage is part of the Adult Time network.
It used to be a stand-alone network of 6 or 7 massage-themed sites.
It's currently a channel in the Adult Time network of massaged-themed sites.
In 2019, the Fantasy Massage network updated 3 times a week.
The current update rate is 4 updates per month.
When Fantasy Massage was a stand-alone network, it had about 6 or 7 massage-themed sites.
Now that Fantasy Massage is part of the Adult Time network, navigation is less precise. If you enter "Fantasy Massage" as a search term for channel content, the search shows 2241 videos.
But trying to find what specific sites or videos are part of the Fantasy Massage channel is messed up: Trying to find a simple chronological listing of videos in many channels is unreliable: There's too much content that does not appear in a simple chronological listing, no matter how many clicks you use to find the content in a single channel, especially when the channel has 2,000 or more videos.
With the different massage sites, you get a variety of massage niches:
-Girl on girl massage.
-Girl on boy massage.
-Boy on girl massage.
-Nuru massage. Nuru massage is a Japanese erotic massage technique when both parties are nude and covered with massage lotion. Nuru massage is supposed to reduce stress and often finishes with sex.
-You get a fake incest element with the Family Sex Massage, where men and women related by marriage have sex. It's made clear this is not real incest, since the bonds are through marriage and not through blood, but fake incest is a strong niche that's been popular for several years now.
I've read that some teens use the line that sex reduces cavities in your teeth, so it's a health measure.
What's amazing is that science bears this out: zinc and calcium in semen help prevent tooth decay and prevent plaque from moving into the heart.
Strange, but true.
I think that using toothpaste with calcium, and taking vitamins with zinc and calcium is a better alternative to swallowing semen.
Just my opinion, of course.
Since you have over 2,000 massage videos, you have a wide variety of porn actors in this category. Men and women. Teens and MILFS. Body types include slender, medium, and heavy. I guess they are trying to appeal to a mass audience with the talent.
Personally, I prefer slender, white, attractive teens, but there's plenty of content to appeal to different tastes.
Some fine-looking teens getting a fantasy massage:
A few of the attractive teen stars appearing in fantasy massage include: Camila, Carolina Sweets, Catania, Chloe Cherry, Emma Piquet, Janette, Kloe, Lilu Tattoo, Liona Levi, Milana Fox, Mirta, Silvia Jons, Sofia Russo, Stacey Lewis, and Tny. The list of teen stars goes on and on.
-Porn models are usually poor actors. Combined with the foolish scripts that are common in porn, the videos can seem stupid, insead of vivid or exciting.
That should be one of the strengths of massage videos: very little acting or plot is required. You have a guy or girl come into a room to get a massage, the massage therapist works on the client and the client gradually becomes aroused, and they have sex.
So the setup is easy, and can naturally lead into sex.
For a low price, you get access to thousands of massage-themed videos and photosets.
You also get access to over 50,000 hardcore videos covering a wide variety of niches.
I wish the navigation was better, that you could find the content that you find most appealing.
In spite of navigation issues, the Adult Time network is one of the best bargains in porn today.
Although I personally find the Wow network, because of the outstanding quality of their teen models and the quality of their videos and photosets, to be an equally fine offering.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-I want to thank PU member Avory for pointing out a special discount that was being offered.
For $70, you got access to the 3 sites of the Wow network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn), plus access to Ultra Films. That access includes unlimited streaming and downloading.
I was paying more than that for access to the 3 Wow network sites. And now, not only did I get a lower price, but I also got Ultra Films access thrown in for free.
-Site features videos with the following options: 720p, 1080p, 2160p (2160p is UHD).
Unlimited streaming, unlimited downloading for videos and photosets.
-The content is exclusive.
-There is a photoset for each video, with 60 to 75 photos per set. The photos are real photos, not screencaps, clear, crisp images, nicely focused, of these lovely young models.
The photosets are definitely worth collecting.
-You can view the photos online, in their photo player.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-You can download each photoset in your choice of 4 definitions: 1,000 px, 2,000 px, 4,000 px, and original, which is 4096 x 2160 px.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Updates once daily, or every other day.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are relatively minor. The Ultra Films site is a fine addition to the Wow network.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The password for Ultra Films site is computer generated, and it's different from the password for the Wow network sites.
-This is a technical issue. You have a membership in one site in the Wow network. But you have access to all 4 sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, Ultra Films). I don't know why the sites/network define the system that way, but that's the reply the support staff tells you if you ask why you don't have a membership in each separate site.
Bottom Line:
The current price is $90/year for access to all 4 sites in the network.
But you might find a discounted offer of $70/year if you search.
I signed up for the Wow Girls email list, and I got an email offer to join the 4 sites for $70 on 2021-03-16 (and have gotten that same offer every few months).
Note: I'm calling the 4 sites a network.
The company itself calls 3 of the sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) the Wow network, but has added free access to the Ultra Films site for the last 4 months.
All Fine Girls and Wow Girls and Wow Porn used to be part of the Diesel network. Then they dropped the name of the Diesel network, except that joining any one of the 3 sites gave you access to all 3 sites. I'm simplifying, because the mechanics of access changed over time.
At one time, if you joined All Fine Girls by itself, you would gain access to the other 2 sites if you remained a member of All Fine Girls for a certain period of time. Or, you could pay an upgrade fee and gain access to all 3 sites.
There were other ways to gain access to all 3 sites, but that is only historical interest.
The current situation is (for the last 4 months) is that if you join any one of the 4 sites, you gain access to all 4 sites.
And if you sign up for the Wow email newsletter, you might find the offer of $70/year in your email inbox, every so often.
The Ultra Films site features videos with most of the same models (late teens, early 20s white girls from Eastern Europe) that are seen at the Wow network.
The girls range from attractive to lovely. They are among the finest collection of hardcore teen models on the internet, and although the site and network are not glamcore, these fresh, young beauties are lovely to watch.
The sex action covers the basic themes of hardcore porn: solo masturbation, boy-girl, boy-2 girls, 2 boys 2 girls, girl-girl, 3 or more girls.
You get blow jobs, vaginal sex, anal sex, lesbian sex.
A smattering of toys, but the models prefer fingers and lips and tongues for solo and lesbian sex.
What sets the site and the network apart is how lovely these teen models are: attractive to lovely young teens that are exploring their bodies, either solo, or with other teen girls, or with one or more boys thrown in.
It's not glamcore or heartcore, because this is not romantic sex: it's just young girls who really enjoy getting off. And it's beautiful to watch. The videos and photos are clear, crisp images of these lovely teens who are putting on a show for you and seem to be really enjoying themselves.
Joie de vivre.
It's hardcore, but it's not smut. It's lovely teen girls who really seem to be enjoying themselves with sex.
And with some boys who are lucky enough to join in the fun.
-Ultra Films is a fine site. But the Wow network of 3 sites are even better sites, because the three sites have far more content, far more models.
But to get all 4 sites for less than I was paying for Ultra Films by itself, and far less than I used to pay for the Wow network, seems like a bargain to me.
The Wow network is one of the best teen hardcore networks on the internet.
The models range from attractive to lovely young teens.
The video quality is outstanding.
The photographic quality is outstanding. The photosets are not glamcore style, but the images are clear, crisp photos of these young teens that are definitely worth collecting.
The Wow network is definitely one of my favorite teen hardcore networks, and I've been a year-long member for several years.
I'm giving the Ultra Films site a score of 95.
The site is excellent.
You get 3 other excellent sites thrown in.
You get quality (the attractive young models, the fine quality of the videos and photos, the simplicity of the navigation.
This is an excellent site and network for teen hardcore porn.
For a price that is a bargain.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discount of $9.95 for the first month. Recurring at $24.95/mo.
-Exclusive content.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-User name is your email address, and you can choose your password, so they are easy to remember.
-Video choice of definition: 240p through 1080p. No 4K available for the site.
-Since the site focuses on female solo masturbation, the tags do a fine job describing the sex action of the video.
-They have a text listing of all the model names at the network (without any thumbnails).
You click on a model's name, it brings up the model's page, with large-sized thumbnails of the model, her videos at the network, and hot links to her content, with a very brief physical description of her attributes.
-PornDoe has a live cam channel. I'm not into live cams, so I didn't explore the channel.
Except the thumbnails show a lot of cute girls.
And there are some free videos and clips, mainly from Club Sweethearts, which is the new name for Club Seventeen.
Cons:
-Poor navigation. For a relatively small site, the site layout is poor.
Sometimes the whole network is fucking stupid.
You might have to navigate (click) through 2 pages of ads to get to the site you want to examine.
Sometimes they present the site in a foreign language, instead of the English language I'm familiar with.
Sometimes you are logged out of the network when you switch channels, and when you try to log back in, you have to click through 2 separate pages of ads before you reach the home page.
-There are ads on every page in the members area, once you get past the 2 separate pages that are only ads.
-Archive site. The last update was apparently Sep 04, 2017.
-They have a photoset for each video, but the photosets contain maybe 10 to 14 photos per set, and are not worth collecting.
-Two pre-checked cross-sales on join page. Be sure to uncheck the cross-sales, because they are limited trials that quickly turn into expensive memberships.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-There is a download limit of 100 videos per month, for the network. A download from any site in the network counts toward that limit.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Quest For Orgasm has 80 Scenes. So it's a small site. But you get access to the Lets Doe It network, which has around 15 sites. The star of the network is The White Boxxx, where they select attractive models and present them in glamcore style as some of the finest, most attractive models on the internet.
-You can sort the videos by newest, most popular, most viewed, or by longest.
-The models range from OK-looking, to attractive, to very attractive. But much more effort is put into making the models more attractive and glamorous at some of the other sites in the network, especially The White Boxxx site.
The models are white, Eastern European girls, late teens to early 30s.
The videos have a runtime from about 28 minutes to about 40 minutes at Quest For Orgasm.
The videos start out with an interview with the model, her life, why she got into porn, what she likes about porn, her hobbies. Trying to make the models seem real, that the models are normal people. After the interview, the model takes off her clothes and uses different toys to achieve orgasm.
Aside from the lousy navigation (the ads, the site time-outs), I didn't find most of the masturbation scenes that erotic. There is no fantasy element. It's porn stars using dildos to achieve orgasm.
Add that it's an archive site with no new content.
Add that there's little effort put into making the models attractive.
I signed up for a one-year membership to the network.
But the increased ads and the fast time-out and the increased difficulty of using the network mean this is my last membership to the network.
I don't have the patience to keep clicking through to find the content that I like.
That's in spite of how gorgeous some of these models are.
This is one of the poorer sites in the network.
I'm giving the site a score of 71.
Excellent comment.
With some fine warnings.
In today's porn, you could almost expect the no download membership version, but was the no download limitation pointed out clearly on the sign-up page? Probably not.
The poor navigation is also irritating.
But the best point is that your account was blocked immediately when you cancelled your membership, instead of being open for the days you paid for.
I would send an email to the PU staff, to see if you could get a partial refund.
The PU staff in the past have helped to resolve PU member problems, and they have more weight on dealing with porn sites than a simple individual.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The site is part of the Full Porn Network, which advertises that is has over 15 different sites. I counted 21 sites currently.
-Can use PayPal or Epoch as your biller.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Site updates with 1 new video every 5 days.
-Videos come with a photoset and screen cap set.
-The videos are crystal cleal, crisp, good lighting, good sound control, nice sets, etc.
-They advertise 4K definition for some of the videos. However, at this site, the maximum definition is 1080p.
-You can comment on the videos, but many of the videos have no member comments.
-Videos come with tags that basically describe the sex action/plot of the video.
-You can choose 1024 or 1600 zip for your photosets.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading, as far as I can tell.
-Download options include: 480p, 720p, 1080p, 4K.
The site shows a 4K option for some videos, but the links to download 4K and 1080p didn't work for me.
Cons:
-Expensive site and expensive network.
$119.88 for the first year.
Or $39.95/month.
But I joined at $60 for the first year, on a holiday promotion.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-First member page after logging in is a page of ads, no site content.
-Ads at top and bottom of each member page.
-The level of attractiveness of the models is below average for many teen sites such as Teen Mega World, and far below the average of the Wow network models.
-Videos are often 10 minutes runtime or less.
-Streaming options are 480p and 720p for the latest site videos. Which is disappointing, because the network advertises 4K videos.
-Many photosets are small. Only 15 photos per set. The photos are excellent, shot by a professional photographer, well-focused, well-lighted, but the action covered is only a part of the video. However, when the photosets are larger, the quality of the photos goes way down. I don't know if it's a photoshop problem or what. Sets are not worthwhile collecting.
Bottom Line:
A partial listing of the sites you get access to with a membership in the network:
Analized
Bad Daddy POV
DTF Sluts James Deen
Only Prince
POV Perverts Twisted Visual
Your Mom Does Porn
The James Deen site is the most famous site in the network. James Deen is the owner of the network, and he has made a name for himself in the porn world, with a lot of female fans who think he is not only cute, but strong and dominant in the way he treats women in his videos.
The network features rough sex, a lot of anal sex, where the women are treated like sluts.
The site theme is fake incest: a bad stepfather has sex with his stepdaughter.
The site is supposed to be educational. Which is misleading. I didn't find any helpful clues about how to treat a girl during sex.
The intro section of each video starts with the disclaimer:
"ATTENTION
The performance you are about to watch is meant for entertainment purposes only. It should not be seen as a model for real-life sexual encounters. We recommend honest, clear, and ongoing communication with your partner(s) before any sexual encounter. All actors in this film are consenting adults who follow specific adult industry regulations. Please have fun, respect each other, and practice safe sex."
However, that disclaimer is for legal purposes only.
In an interview James Deen gave, he said underage teens could watch his videos and get a good idea of how to have exciting sex.
The titles of some of the videos seem to be instructional.
For example, "Brooke Haze: Helps You Cum With Jerk Off Instructions".
I was slightly disappointed with that video, and other videos with a similar title.
For one thing, the video is a solo model video, where the girl role-plays being your step-daughter and slowly strips while talking dirty.
I was hoping a guy would be there, and the girl could show you the best way to masturbate while watching the video.
But I guess you're left on your own, to figure out how to masturbate, because there is no guy in the video showing you the best moves.
Actually, the Jerk Off Instruction videos follow the same pattern.
A short video, 10 minutes or less, features a teen model stripping and talking dirty.
So there's no real instruction.
The model touches herself, but if there's any passion, it's in what you yourself bring to the video. The model is putting on a show, so if that's enough to get you off, fine. But many porn site videos with solo models feature masturbation, and this site, for the Jerk Off Instruction series, is mainly tease with dirty talking. When I say tease, I mean the dirty talking, the self-fondling, the nudity is supposed to turn you on, because you are watching young girls playing with themselves and stripping and role-playing talking to you as their daddy.
The videos where the girl is with a stunt cock are better. The girl and her step-father have sex. The step-father is usually off-screen. I guess you are supposed to place yourself into the scene as the step-father. Sometimes the step-father punishes the girl by slapping her ass, but it's mild punishment, and the girl undressses following the step-father's instructions, because slapping a girl's ass covered by clothes is not as effective or as fun as slapping a naked ass.
And you need a way to get the clothes off the girl if you're going to fuck her anyway.
(The plots are simple in the site videos.)
The sex at the site is less rough and not as brutal as some of the other sites in the network.
The girls put on a show, and the idea of sex with your stepdaughter is prominent, but the girls don't show a lot of resistance at having sex with their stepfather.
Sex with a step- is supposed to be kinky, but a common theme in porn in the last few years.
I thought the site was one of the tamer sites in the network.
The network mainly features rough sex, anal sex, and treating the girls as sluts who want to be dominated.
This site features girls who are role-playing to a step-father who wants to have sex with his daughter.
I would keep trying to have a lifetime membership renewed.
If you paid for the membership, unless there was a legal reason for the membership to expire (such as bankruptcy or change of ownership), a lifetime membership should continue until the death of the paying member, or the life of the site.
And just because the site changed its name is not sufficient cause to cancel a lifetime membership.
Maybe you could contact PU staff to explain your problem, and they might be able to help.
I know in the past that the PU staff has helped solve PU member problems with sites, whether the PU member joined a site through a PU link or not.
If you're not sure "how to contact the PU staff, start a thread and explain your problem, and ask for help from the PU staff.
Label the thread: "Hegre lifetime membership expired" the same as your comment.
PU staff has much more weight when dealing with sites than an individual member.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A large channel with 568 videos.
I got the 568 video count from a listing of all videos under the Anal Teen Angels site, but see the con section to see why that count is not reliable.
-Almost all the vids have a matching photoset, a zip file for easy downloading.
-Almost all the vids feature late teen, early twenty models from Eastern Europe who are mainly white, slender, usually attractive.
-Each video features a nice-sized thumbnail to show you what the featured model looks like, and the thumbnails are gifs that show you a brief sketch of the video action.
-The earliest videos offer 160p, 480p, 540p from 2009.
-The default file name of a video includes the video title_model name_file definition. To be inclusive, you can manually add the date posted and the site name.
-Video runtime is 30 minutes or less for the early videos, but the videos of the last few years have a runtime of 40 minutes or less.
-Site is still updating in 2021.
Cons:
-Slow update rate. Site updates with 1 or 2 videos per month.
-Some links to download a video definition lead to a 404 error, page not found. So can't download the video in a definition that is supposed to be available.
-Many of the early videos are from other sites, like Devils Film or 21 Sextury. So when I say the number of videos is 568, that is what one page displays, and the pages add up to 568 videos from my personal count of the pages listed. But a different page displays 276 video total for Anal Teen Angels, and a different page lists 375 videos for the Anal Teen Angels site. And a still different page shows a count of 374 videos for Anal Teen Angels.
I only counted all the pages shown for the 568 video count, not bothering to count the individual pages for the other counts listed.
-The 160p and 240p definition videos are not worth watching: the sets are cheap, the lighting is poor, the picture quality is poor.
-The listing of videos in chronological order is not in order.
Bottom Line:
The site has a large number of videos.
All the videos I saw had some anal action, although there is plenty of other types of sex.
A solo girl might be playing with a dildo, but if she sticks it up her ass, that counts for anal action.
However, most of the anal action is boy-girl, where the guy sticks his dick up her ass.
So if you're into anal action, this site will give you a massive amount of hardcore anal sex.
But you also get solo girl, girl-girl, and girl-girl-girl action, as well.
It's like a smorgasbord of sexual partners.
The models are Eastern Europe, mainly teens to early twenties. A lot of the models are cute.
That you've seen featured at Teen Mega World, the Wow network, Teen Skeet, even some models at MetArt and other premium glamour sites. Some of the model names are familiar, but in the porn world, a familiar model can easily have a different name than the one you normally see her with. That's porn world, where a model can have 1 common name, or even 5 to 10 names at different sites.
Over the years, they upgraded the sets, the video equipment, and the videos have shown a lot of improvement over the years.
They started offering 1080p video maybe 8 years ago at this site.
They started offering 4K video around 2019.
The main value of the site is the large amount of cute teen models, doing hardcore sex, including anal sex.
The branding of these videos is messed up.
The site started around 2009.
The first videos used the "Anal Teen Angels" logo.
Then, in 2010, the videos used the "21 Sextury" logo, even though the videos had a link by the thumbnail stating "Anal Teen Angels".
And if you look at the early videos at the site, under the Adult Time network, which the site is part of, you can find a lot of videos with the "Devils Film" logo displayed on the video.
So it's confusing, if you want to search for the videos that belong to Anal Teen Angels, because, like I said, the site will give you different counts for the number of videos that belong to the site, depending on which page you are looking at.
Bottom Line:
Forget the purist approach.
By subscribing to the Adult Time network, or the Anal Teen Angels site, you gain access to a huge amount of hardcore teen anal sex, along with other types of sex. The site is mainly boy/girl, but there's plenty of girl-girl, with some solo girl and multiple girl sex. All the sex includes some form of anal play.
So for people who enjoy anal, this site should be a worthwhile sub.
And the Adult Time network has a boatload of other hardcore anal sex videos, as well as plenty of other hardcore sex action. The Adult Time network has around 54,000 hardcore videos, covering a wide variety of niches.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-If you want to join any of the sites in the network, join through the 18Videoz site.
The reason: $60/year is the normal price for joining the 18Videoz network.
But if you join through one of the sites in the network, you will probably pay:
$29.95/month, or $39.95 for 3 months.
-The models are young teens and mainly very attractive.
They are Eastern European girls, and if you've joined Teen Mega World, the Wow network, Team Skeet, you've probably seen a lot of these models already.
-Part of the 18Videoz network. So you get access to 16 sites. Which is a large number of sites.
-They advertise daily updates for the network. But the actual update rate is 5 or 6 times per week for the network. The update rate for the Casual Teen Sex site itself is 2-4 videos per month.
-The login is secure (https).
-Started adding 4K definition on Nov 28, 2016 on some new network videos. But the highest definition at Casual Teen Sex videos is still 1080p.
-Upgraded the video player on May 30, 2016.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-You can favorite videos, models, and photosets.
-Physical data on the models includes: age(when shot), DOB, Nationality, Ethnicity, Height, Weight, Hair Color, Eye Color.
CONS(START OF):
Major cons:
-The main con is the site (and network) don't showcase the models as attractively as they should be presented. Many of these girls are found at Teen Mega World, the Wow network, even some on MetArt. At Teen Mega World, the same girls are prettier. At the Wow network, they usually look even better. And if they appear at the MetArt site, they look even more attractive.
So the impact of the girls videos at Casual Teen Sex is diminished.
I mean some of these girls are attractive to fucking gorgeous, but you wouldn't know it from watching these videos. The site (and the network) is trying to provide a casual, everyday visual experience of a fly-on-the-wall of these sexual encounters, but they are wasting the physical beauty of the models.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Minor cons:
-Every so often, your password will not be accepted. So you have to re-set your password.
Which is easy. You have to solve a captcha to re-set your password.
-The username and password are computer-generated, so you have to write them down or use a password manager to remember them, because your mind won't remember either the username or the password assigned to you (unless you have a photographic memory).
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Sound control when scenes are outdoor is sloppy. You hear extraneous loud noises, such as the wind or whatever.
-The models usually speak in some Eastern European language, with no subtitles. But once the models start moaning and groaning, from arousal or excitement, subtitles aren't needed.
-The 3 larger thumbnails at the top of the members page are ads, which you realize after clicking on them and, instead of bringing up a video to watch, you bring up a new site to join.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site (and network) is hardcore teen porn.
-The network has 3,316 videos.
-The network has 2,287 models.
-The network has 217,718 pictures.
I wrote that the 18Videoz network has 16 sites you get access to.
You get 2 additional bonus sites, which include Teens Analyzed and 18 Pussy Club. The 2 bonus sites are technically not part of the 18Videoz network. Until late 2020, Teens Analyzed (and probably 18 Pussy Club) were part of the 18Videoz network.
You still get access to the 2 sites, with a membership in the Videoz network, except the 2 sites are now considered "bonus sites".
This is the first time I've ever seen this: sometimes the member pages are non-secure, and sometimes they are secure. But the login is always secure, as far as I can tell.
The site theme is a guy picking up a new girl on the street. They talk for a few minutes, then go to an apartment and kiss and then have sex. So the setup to the sex lasts a few minutes. But the girls are hot to trot.
If, instead of a guy picking up a girl on the street, a guy might come over to a girl's apartment, to fix an appliance, or to just meet her. And since the girl is horny, and the guy picks up on her signals right away, they are soon touching and stroking each other and having sex.
So not a lot of plot or build-up to the sex.
The site started in late 2009.
Currently the site has 416 videos, with matching photosets.
The earliest videos feature cheap sets, cheap street wear costumes. The earliest videos have 240p to 480p definition.
1080p definition was introduced in 2010.
As time went on, the sets featured better apartments, better street wear costumes, and better equipment to videotape the scenes.
But the plot, or lack of it, remained the same: boy meets girl, they start kissing and fondling in a few minutes, and then the sex.
The main attraction, other than the hardcore sex, which becomes boring after a while because it's so repetitious, is how cute the teen girls are. But as I said, these girls are not presented as attractively as they should be. So the videos lack impact.
Giving the site a score of 80.
The girls are attractive.
The sex is hardcore.
But the thrill is gone, baby. I want to watch something that is arousing, erotic, has some story or passion to give the sex some meaning or impact.
My guess is that either you missed a pre-checked cross-sale on a subscription you joined.
Or, that you unchecked a pre-checked cross-sale on a join, but they signed you up anyway to the cross-sale.
I remember one time, I was signed up to a pre-checked cross-sale to a different site, even though I had unchecked the pre-checked box.
I had to pay the limited trial fee, but cancelled the sub I didn't want.
(When they push through a pre-checked cross-sale, it's hard as heck to get a refund, even if you cancel the same day you are signed up.)
Glad you were able to get a refund.
And yes, some of these billing agents forget to send a confirmation email, when you are signed up to a paysite. It happens.
"So, if you are bored, like lots of negative excitement, love spam, this is the site for you!"
I am bored, but will skip your kind suggestion of signing up to this site.
LOL.
I get plenty of spam already.
It sounds like TushyRaw is part of the group that includes Vixen, Tushy, Blacked, BlackedRaw.
I suggest writing an email to clubseventeen or clubsweethearts support or whichever site you want to join, to find your answer.
You might have to wait a few days for a reply to your email, because support doesn't always answer immediately.
But their support should have the most accurate info to your question.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the MetArt network. So the basic site structure is basically the same for all the MetArt network of 15+ sites.
This means you get all the trimmings of a first-class photo oriented site:
-High, medium and low resolution zips for each photoset.
-Complete model listing with large-sized thumbnails of the models, with links to each model's content at the site.
-Superior support for email which is 24/7. But a live chat option would be even better.
The support staff will go out of their way to help with any requests.
Probably the finest support of any network, except for Vendo and Famesupport, both of which have a live chat option plus the standard email and telephone support that is 24/7.
-Easy navigation. Can search by model's name, or by title of the photoset or video, or by date posted.
-Good update rate. They update with a new video or photoset every 2 days, which they've continued even during the covid epidemic.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Most of the content is exclusive. But some of the older content is from other sites. If you're a porn expert, you might recognize some of the content from Teen Mega World or other competing sites.
-PU has a discounted price of $19.99/month. Regular price is $29.99/month.
-No download or streaming limits. Which is nice, in this era of sites setting daily or monthly limits for downloads.
-All videos have a choice of 270p through 1080p. Videos posted from Mar 15, 2015 on have a 4K option.
CONS(START OF):
-Cons are basically minor.
-Searching by posting date is a little clunky. The main Metart site used to have a simpler system, where each year was laid out more easily. But now you have to find the link for each year and each month you want to search, which takes more clicks.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites, but a little disappointing for a premium porn site that's part of the Metart network.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Videos start with the standard Metart intro visual and theme music, which lasts less than 1 minute. I wish they would drop the intro visual and theme music, which they use for many of the videos at the different Metart network sites. It's a form of advertising, but it's waste of time to watch.
I'm being picky, but after seeing the same intro to over 1,000 different videos at the Metart sites, I wish they would eliminate it, or have an option to skip past the intro section.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): The Life Erotic shares some of the models from the Metart.com site, but also uses a lot of models that are more into midcore. The main Metart.com site is strictly softcore glamcore (although they have been trying to make it a little edgier, with some of the photosets and videos allowing the models to fondle themselves a little). The Life Erotic mainly features female mastubation. There is also some solo nudity and some lesbian sex. To add spice, the model can use toys, fancy costumes, ropes or chains for a hint of BDSM.
Some of the videos can be intriguing or amusing.
One video with Riya, a cute, tiny (5' 2") blonde, aged 18, has Riya walk into her kitchen get a glass of water. She drinks some water, notices a banana, sucks on it, rubs the banana on her crotch, get a condom from a drawer, puts the condom over the banana, and inserts the banana into her pussy.
First time I've seen a banana getting a condom.
Riya then masturbates with the condonized banan.
After she reaches orgasm, she removes the banana, removes the condom and throws it away, then peels the banana and eats it, pumping it in and out her mouth as she savors its sweet flesh…
One of the main lessons from this site is that girls don't need boys to get off: a toy (or fingers) can be an excellent substitute for a boy. Or even another girl.
Metart is supposed to be erotic glamcore without any sex, just nudity. No boys allowed at the site (except for male photographers or videographers). The Life Erotic is erotic glamcore with sex. Mainly solo masturbation by the models, with and without toys, with and without costumes. But there are also some lesbian scenes. Again, no boys allowed at the site.
Comparing the two sites, Metart is probably the premier softcore site on the internet, for several different reasons:
-The vast number of photosets (22,264).
-The vast number of models (3,813).
-The large number of contributing photograpers (289) who can give you their personal viewpoint on the photosets.
-4 updates daily, except 6 updates on the first of each month.
-The complete model listing with large-sized thumbnails that show you what the models look like, and that have links to their content at the site.
-The easy navigation of the site, in spite of the massive amount of content.
-And a number of bells and whistles that make it easy to format the site offerings to your individual taste.
The Life Erotic is a much smaller site. Instead of the softcore approach of the Metart site, The Life Erotic shows the models as sexual creatures. Like Metart, there are no boys at The Life Erotic site, but the girls show you that boys aren't needed to get off: the solo nude scenes, with and without masturbation, can be very erotic, especially with the right costumes and toys and the implied story line behind the photosets and videos. And the lesbian scenes, which are in the minority, also show some edge in presenting the models.
Both sites have a huge number of attractive models.
Most of the models are white, mainly from Eastern Europe, but there are a few Asian, African, and Latina models, but non-white are definitely in the minority.
If you want a more erotic site than Metart, The Life Erotic might be a good choice.
Both sites have the same price of $19.95/month, with a discount from PU.
I suggest a 1-month sub to both sites, if you have the money, to see which site you enjoy more.
You are more efficient than me.
Which is one reason I admire your reviews.
Brevity, conciseness, clarity, are parts of why I think your reviews deserve a premium over average reviews, and you're not getting paid what your reviews should earn.
I suggested awarding outstanding reviews with a better prize in the past, but no action was taken on the idea.
Which is one reason I would willing to share part of any prize I win in the future.
Shen also submitted outstanding reviews.
But unfortunately his participation and reviews have been limited for a while.
I believe that outstanding contributions should be rewarded, to encourage active participation from some members.
That's my opinion, for what it's worth.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Site is part of the MetArt network. So you can expect a premium setup:
Easy navigation, lots of attractive models, all the bells and whistles you find at the other MetArt sites: multiple definitions for photosets, unlimited downloads, numerous contributing phototographers, easy navigation, etc.
Cons:
-Slow update rate. You get 2 photosets per week. Since photosets are the only content offered, that is a major fault.
-There are no bonus features at the site. Or maybe you can call the cam shows a bonus feature, but that is the same standard pay cam show featured at all the Metart sites.
-The are no videos at the site. A minor fault, since most Metart videos tend to be boring, in spite of the lovely models.
-At least some of the photoset updates were probably shot years ago. By models who apparently retired years ago. This includes Camilla A, Caramel, etc. Actually, many sites in the Metart network are running out of sets photographed recently due to the covid epidemic, and are using old content as updates.
-I think the Erotic Beauty online slideshow player is clunky: you have a choice of a large thumbnail which only takes a small portion of your monitor, or an enlarged photo that expands beyond the limits of your monitor. The enlarged photo is meant for detailed viewing.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
I want a simple slideshow player that fits the image onto the monitor, which is what most other sites offer.
-The photosets offer fewer tags (descriptors) than most Metart sites.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Erotic Beauty is not a poor site. But when you compare it to Metart, it suffers. Metart updates with 4 new photosets or videos per day, except on the first of each month, it has 6 updates. Erotic Beauty updates with 2 photosets per week. Metart has far more contributing photographers, so you get a wider range of styles. Metart photographers: 289 Erotic Beauty photographers: 189
The catalog of Metart is massive: 22,234 photosets versus 5,243 at Erotic Beauty.
The number of models at Metart: 3,811. Models at Erotic Beauty: 2,184.
Number of videos at Metart: 1,781. Erotic Beauty videos: 0
(Except most videos at Metart are boring and a waste of space. Not worth collecting, no matter how lovely the models are in real life.)
The membership price for Erotic Beauty is the same as the price for Metart.
So if you're going to join one of the Metart glamour sites for the photosets, choose Metart. Erotic Beauty comes in a distant second.
Note: if you're wondering why I've been a member for over 12 months, years ago I found a special offer of $1/month membership.
So for $1 a month, I'm still a member.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-All Fine Girls belongs to the Wow network (they recently re-branded the 3 sites into the Wow Network, that years ago, was called the Diesel network. But they dropped the Diesel network name years ago, and for some reason, separated the All Fine Girls site from the 2 Wow sites.
For a while, membership in the 3 sites was complicated. But for the last few years, if you joined any one of the 3 sites, you automatically got access to all 3 sites in what is now called the Wow network.
-There is a special membership discount the last few months.
You get the 3 regular sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) plus the Ultra Films site, for $89.95/year.
Normally, the Wow network by itself charges more than that.
But here, you're getting the Ultra Films site thrown in for free, plus a large discount on the Wow network. The regular price on the Ultra Films site, by itself, is $90/year.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The level of models at the Wow network and the Ultra Films site is probably the finest collection of teens on the internet. The models range from cute to gorgeous.
If you've had any porn experience, you've probably seen many of these models at TMW, MetArt, and many other fine sites, but they are displayed at this site (and network) in glorious living color. And they put on a show that's worth watching.
-There are numerous technical features for streaming and downloading.
-Streaming and downloading are unlimited. A few years ago, they offered a streaming only option for a lower price, but they dropped the streaming only option.
-You get the choice of streaming in 480p through 4K.
-You get the choice of downloading in 480p through 4K.
-You can also choose a frame rate of 30fps or 60fps.
-You can select the parts of a video you want to steam or download (if you want to skip to your favorite parts of the video).
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-With a discounted price of $90/year for the Wow network, and with Ultra Films site thrown in for free, the cons are minor.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Customer support can be slow to respond to questions or problems.
-They used to have a page for member questions, that was dropped many years ago.
-Note: if you pay the $90/year for membership, technically they give you a membership to one site. You are not a member of the other 3 sites, even though you have access to them. This was confirmed by customer support at Wow Girls.
Although you are not a member of 3 of the sites, your login details still work at each site, so somehow you are both a member and non-member.
-No bio data on the models, or physical data.
BOTTOM LINE(START 0F):
This is one of the better memberships on the internet.
The reasons:
-The models are pretty to fucking gorgeous. And the photography and videos show how gorgeous they are. This is not a glamcore or heartcore site or network, but it's borderline glamcore. The models don't wear glamourous costumes, but they wear nice clothes, the sets are very nice, the photography and videos are excellent: crisp and vivid images, excellent technical control (good focus, good sound control, good lighting, everything is good to excellent).
-The membership price is a bargain. $89/year for access to the Wow network plus Ultra Films.
I paid around $120/year just for the Wow network alone, until I found a special discount for around $90. That didn't include the Ultra Films site, which I paid for separately.
And now you get the 4 sites for $90/year, which I think is a fantastic bargain.
You get access to the 4 sites, but only membership in one site.
If you want to be nit-picky.
Bottom line summary: The Wow network and Ultra Films for $90/year is a fantastic bargain.
The girls are cute to gorgeous.
The videos and photosets are excellent.
You don't have any foolish problems about poor acting, washed out colors, stupid plots: it's just a pleasure to watch these girls put on a show for you.
The site and network is laid out intelligently, making navigation simple and easy.
You get numerous choices on streaming and downloading videos and photosets.
The model listing is first-rate, with large thumbnails of the girls to show you exactly what they look like.
There are plenty of tags and filters if you need help navigating.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-MyFamilyPies is part of the Nubiles Porn network. The Nubiles Porn network is a fine network, where, in the main, the videos are crisp and clear, and well lighted. What a change from the Bang My Teen Ass site, the last site I reviewed, where the videos were washed out and the naturally attractive teen models were blah. At My Family Pies, you get crisp images of how lovely some of these models are.
Chloe Cherry, Haley Reed, Katie Kush, Kyler Quinn,Lady D, Stacy Cruz, Tiffany Tatum, and Zazie are just some of the cute models featured at the site.
-Video definition runs from 270p through 1080p for most videos.
They started offering 4K video definition for new videos at the site in October 2020, so the 4K option is definitely in the minority.
-PU has a special discount:
monthly: $14.98
yearly: $99.95
Sometimes you can find a yearly membership at $84.
-Content is exclusive.
-Navigation is easy.
-Excellent search engine.
-121+ photos per photoset.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
You also get a photoset of the same scene with screencaps. The sceencap photosets have a condensed number of screencaps, maybe 43. The idea of the screencap photoset is to save storage space, I guess. I think the photo photosets, if the model is really cute, are the better choice to collect. The images of the photos versus the screencaps are much crisper and better focused.
-They don't have a trailer for the videos, but the tags show you what the action will be in the video. Or you can play a slideshow of the photoset as a preview.
-There is a model listing for each site that can be arranged alphabetically, by posting date, or by rating. The model listing is nice-sized thumbnails that give you a good idea of what the model looks like.
CONS(START OF):
-The major con is how thin and stupid the plots are. And the acting is amateur.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-If you can ignore the stupid plots and lame acting (which is hard to do), many of the models are attractive young teens, and the sex can be OK.
-The models and stunt cocks speak English in the videos, but with an accent. I assume they are from Eastern Europe originally. I would prefer subtitles instead. I know many people don't like reading subtitles when watching a movie or video, but I don't mind. But the strange accents are irritating for me. (Maybe I need to start taking tranquilizers when I watch my porn?)
-Irregular update rate. You might get 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 new videos in a month.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site theme: In today's world, divorce is common. So when divorced people remarry, they often make a blended family, with children from each parent.
This site shows that the blended step-children can have sex with each other (which I call fake incest, since the videos make clear there is no real incest by blood relations), and the step-children can also have sex with their step-parents.
So the taboo factor is supposed to make the sex hotter.
Fake incest, also some young-old sex when the step parents have sex with the step children.
I much prefer the Pure Taboo site (part of the Adult Time network) for the story-driven plots of taboos, which has cinematic quality videos, and excellent acting by the models).
Pure Taboo is a much finer site, but the MyFamilyPies does feature some cute models, and if you can ignore or accept the stupid plots and poor acting, the sex can be watchable. Or the sex can be boring.
What I like about the site is the sets are nice, the lighting is excellent, some of the models are cute. The site is well organized, is easy to navigate, and there are plenty of technical features to stream or download the videos and photosets.
But the stupid plots and the poor acting ruin the videos.
Maybe you could ignore the videos, which should be the main draw of the site, and slideshow the photosets. This would erase the stupid dialog, the stupid plot, the poor acting. And you could create your own plot to explain the slideshow. Except it would take a genius to create an intelligent plot for the slideshow. Because the female models and the stunt cocks usually act like morons, and the slideshows (even without dialogue) show this clearly.
I know I'm being harsh. I just can't get past the stupid plots and poor acting.
I suspect the models are trying for a comedic effect, because the plots make very little sense, but I would prefer the Teen Mega World style, or the Wow Porn style, of straight sex, with a little plot thrown in, but good hardcore sex. And the stupid plots at MyFamilyPies get in the way of any enjoyment of the sex.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the 18videoz network. You get access to 18 sites.
-You have network access to over 3,000 videos. That is a large amount of hardcore videos.
-Starting Feb 17, 2017, the site and network gives expired members free limited access to our website. You will be able to see all picture sets, some videos and a preview of all the latest updates in your member zone. If your password stopped working you can reset it on login page or ask our support for help.
-Starting Nov 28, 2016, the network offered 4K video quality for their latest movies.
-Many of the videos and photosets are exclusive. There are videos that have been sold to competing sites. So it depends on your porn experience whether you will come across videos you've seen before.
-Updated the video player (for streaming videos) on May 30, 2016.
-Vendo is the default biller. A trusted name. I've used Vendo many times over the years and never had a problem.
-All Bang My Teen Ass videos offer definitions of 272p through 1080p.
Cons:
-Even with a PU discount, the membership fee is very high. However, I found a holiday special of $59.95/year to join 18Videoz.com directly.
Normal PU discount is:
Monthly: $29.95
Multi-Mo: $39.95 (2 months, recurs $19.95/mo.)
Multi-Mo: $49.95 (3 months, non-recurring)
-Archive site. Last update was Feb 2, 2015.
-Small site. 96 videos.
-Some of the videos can be seen at other porn sites, such as Teen Mega World.
-I wish the videos had brighter lighting, better clarity. For a 1080p video, it's slightly disappointing. I much prefer the videos at Teen Mega World, which seem more vibrant. And the videos at the Wow Porn sites are better still.
-Login is not secure. Member pages are not secure.
--Every so often, you have to re-set your password. I'm not sure if this is because it's a security measure, or if your password has been hacked.
-Ads on member pages. You click on the thumbnail of a pretty girl, and a different site pops up to join that new site.
Site theme:
Teens getting fucked in the ass.
Although the site name implies the site concentrates on anal sex, in my opinion, the site name is just a generic name that tries to attract anal lovers, but doesn't really live up to the promise.
Yes, there is some anal sex. But it's just a small part of the action. The site is small, and the action is standard porn with some breast licking and sucking, cunnilinges, blowjob, vaginal sex, and anal sex thrown in.
I don't think anal lovers will be impressed by the site: If you want glamcore anal sex, I think Tushy would be a better choice. Because Tushy is not only glamcore, but it definitely concentrates on anal sex.
I said the models are not impressive. Actually, the site features many of the same Eastern European models you have seen at TMW and the Wow sites and other porn sites. So the models can be cute, but they are not presented attractively. You have teen girls that, at competing sites, might be cute to extremely attractive, but at this site they just seem blah.
I'm talking Olivia Grace, Taissia Shanti, Foxy Di, Margarita C, Anika A and others who not only appear at TMW, Wow sites, but even MetArt and other fine photo sites. But the Wow sites make the models so much more attractive in their scenes, and even the TMW sites do a better job presenting these models. These models are fucking attractive, but their scenes at Bang My Teen Ass are disappointing. The girls don't come across as super-attractive, and the scenes lack heat.
I'm giving the site a score of 78.
First, it's an archive site: last update was Feb 2, 2015.
It's a small site, with 96 videos.
The videos are meh. Boring, in spite of how cute the models can be at sites that present the models more attractively, in scenes with better heat or passion.
Navigation is easy, because it's a small site, and you get access to the 18videoz network, which has 18 sites to browse.
So there is plenty of hardcore videos at the network to browse, but this site lacks heat or visual appeal.
Am I spoiled by my long association with porn?
The site has many porn starlets that are just more attractive and show better heat at other sites, and that's why it doesn't deserve a higher score.
You're watching a scene in 1080p, and it seems like the colors are washed out and faded. I don't know if it's because the scenes are from years ago, or if they were shot on poor equipment.
But these girls deserve to be presented more attractively, with crisper images, with better heat.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
