A work-around might be:
Clear cookies from your computer.
Use a different (or new) email address.
Then try the promotion to see if it works.
I've used that to join sites with a reduced price, that at first denied me the reduced price because I was a former member.
These were non-porn sites, like Hulu and Starz and a few other sites.
It depends on whether you think such an approach is ethical.
Businesses often think a new subscriber is entitled to a lower rate than a returning or current subscriber.
That's very different from the old-time approach of rewarding customer loyalty.
But both porn and non-porn businesses favor new subscribers over returning subscribers. Cable, newspapers, porn sites, internet, offer lower rates to new members versus old members.
I'd email customer service for Metart.
They usually respond to emails within a few hours or sooner.
And they've been friendly and helpful with any problems I've had.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU shows a discounted price of $14.98/month recurring.
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. You get access to 17 different sites.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading privileges for the videos and photo sets.
-The technical features of the videos and photo sets are excellent: clear, crisp images, good to excellent flesh-tones of the models, nice sets, good lighting, good focus.
-There is a photo set for each video.
-Videos and photo sets come in your choice of multiple definitions.
-Site navigation is easy.
-Multiple tags and a text description describe the plot of each scene.
-Content is exclusive.
Cons:
-The poor acting level of the models, the stupid scripts and dialogue are strong negatives that negate the technical qualities of the videos.
-The level of attractiveness of the models (both the teens and MILFs) is below average for the network.
Princess Cum, Nubiles Casting, Petite HD Porn, Petite Ballerinas Fucked, Nubiles.net, all have teen models that are far more attractive.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Advertising for competing sites and for the Nubiles Porn network take up a good part of the real estate of every member page. The good thing about the advertising for the Nubiles Porn network is that each hot link serves as a link to open that particular site.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
Number of videos: 147
Runtimes: most videos run from 20 to 40 minutes.
All videos available in definition from 270p through 1080p.
Newer videos starting Oct 18, 2020 have a 4K option.
Photo sets have from 28 to 200 photos per set.
Site theme: Faux incest: a step-mother has sex, either with her step-daughter, or her step-son, or with her step-child and her step-child's sex partner.
So there's some old-young appeal, teen niche, milf niche, lesbian element. Because you have women in their 30s and 40s, you have a wider selection of body types beyond the slender teenagers.
The site falls into the reality porn niche, except when I watch these videos, they seem fake as hell. That's because of the poor acting abilities of the models and the stunt cocks, and the poor scripts, which are unbelievable.
=========
Edit:
I am confused about faux incest. I've read on the internet that laws regarding incest vary considerably between jurisdictions.
In many areas, legally, there is no difference between an adopted child and a biological child for incest.
To make that clear, an adopted child cannot marry the daughter or son of his adoptive parents, because the effect of the adoption order is to create a blood relationship between them.
I don't know why so many sites show fake incest (what I call fake incest, which is sex between step-relatives).
Most sites make it very clear there is no blood relation between the sex partners, but there is a step-relation between the sex partners.
So even though these are actors, not real blood relations and not real step-relatives, the sex between step-relatives would be illegal.
So what's the point of making it clear that the actors are playing step-relatives instead of blood relatives?
Since, legally, a step-relative is a blood relative?
In some jurisdictions, adopted siblings who are related by adoption only, but not by blood, can marry.
But that interpretation seems to be very limited.
=========
The main strengths of the site:
-You get access to all 17 sites of the Nubiles Porn network.
-The videos are professionally shot: Clear, crisp imagery, good lighting, nice sets, nice sound control.
-Easy site navigation.
-Easy to switch to a different site in the network.
-Relatively low membership price: $14.98/month with a PU discount.
The main cons of the site:
-The stupid plots. The poor acting.
-I don't find the models very attractive. Other sites in the network have more attractive models.
-I definitely enjoy many other sites in the network far more than I enjoy this site.
This is a personal opinion: I don't enjoy the site.
The Nubiles.net site (part of this network) is the main value of the network.
That site serves as an encyclopedia of teen porn starlets who are starting out in their careers.
There are other sites in the network that are worth viewing.
If Milf-teen incest porn is your fantasy, the site might be more pleasing for you.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. So you get access to 17 different sites. The most valuable site in the network is the Nubiles.net site, which is like an encyclopedia of young porn stars starting out in their porn career.
-Tiny site, so navigation is simple to find the entire content. Only 14 videos total.
-Videos have your choice of definition for streaming and downloading: from 270p through 1080p.
-Videos have an accompanying photo set and screen cap set.
-The photo set has 3 zip file definitions: small, medium and large.
-You also get a screen cap set of each video. Not sure why a screen cap is useful if you have access to the photo set. Because the screen cap files are large: 1.5 to 2.0 MB each. The photos are slightly better focused than the screen caps, the photo gives you your choice of small, medium or large definition, and even the large definition individual photo is only around 4 MB in file size. So I see no reason to have the screen cap version available.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-The videos and photosets are clear and crisp. Professional lighting, focus, nice sets.
-The tags and text description of each video do an excellent job describing the video.
-Content is exclusive.
CONS(START OF):
-The main con is this is an archive site. The last update was Oct 18, 2018.
-Tiny site. 14 videos total.
-Lots of ads. The first page you see after you login is a page full of ads. Then, when you click to the members area, you see ads on every member page. But those ads are located near the bottom of the page and can be easily ignored.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Uncheck the cross-sale checkmark, or you will be signed up to a limited trial membership to a different site which turns into an expensive membership within 2 or 3 days. If you do want to join that other site, join with a PU discount if there is one, or join directly, for a much cheaper price.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
Number of videos: 14
Archive site: last update was Oct 18, 2018.
These videos are based on real incidents.
That's why they are called reality video.
Edit: I was being facetious with my remarks about reality porn. Most reality porn does not use real-life couples. The models can be amateurs or professionals, but the couples are not real-life couples. Just a guy and a girl who are being paid to have sex.
Studies have shown that most teenagers have been exposed to porn.
So teens are getting at least part of their education about sex from porn. Which is a poor source of information, because most porn is unrealistic fantasy.
The site title is Daddy's Lil Angel. But the subtitle, as shown in some videos, is "Teen Anal Porn". Which explains the site focus on anal play.
I would assume that Daddy's Lil Angel would be about the fantasy of fathers having taboo sex with their daughters. Apparently the fantasy of fathers having sex with their daughters is borderline illegal. What porn sites show for incest porn is sex between step-relatives. Almost all porn sites that show incest porn make that very clear: it's a step-relative, a step-father, step-mother, step-sister or step-brother, not a blood relative, even though these are all actors anyway, and not related by blood.
So the site theme is step-fathers having anal sex with their step-daughters.
Which seems like a simple idea to play.
Except most porn models are not good actors.
And the plots at this site are paper-thin.
The step father, for some reason, wants to punish his step daughter, he spanks her, she's excited by the spanking, he's angry and excited by her response, he whips out his cock, shoves it in her mouth, she starts sucking, then it's off to the races with cunnilingus, vaginal and anal sex, etc.
The basic plot is the step-daughter does something that ticks off the step-father. This leads to sex, no matter how flimsy the reason. Or for no reason, except this is what the plot says to do: have sex, after showing that the girl is the step-daughter.
Really stupid plots. Really poor acting. But you're supposed to turn off your brain and enjoy the nudity and sex.
The level of attractiveness of the models is below the standards of the network. They are not ugly, but they're just not as cute or pretty as most of the models at the other network sites.
What could they do to improve the site?
Choose more attractive models. Models who can act. Use plots that make more sense, or that are more believable. The videos and photo sets are fine technically: crisp, clear imagery, nice sets. But it's wasted on poor content.
Or they could just delete the site. Because it seems like wasted space. A wasted theme.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-The site is easy to use: Simple navigaton for a well-laid out site. Easily visible links for videos, photo sets.
-Good search engine.
-The models range from attractive to lovely. These are young teen, early 20s girls, who just look gorgeous. The attractiveness of the models is one of the main highlights of the site.
-There is a free live cam site. You can watch free shows, can tip the models.
-Porn Users has a discounted price of $14.98 for the first month, recurring at $19.94/mo.
Or $84/year.
-Nubile Films comes with 4 bonus sites: Fantasy of the Month, Girls Only Porn, Hot Crazy Mess, and That Sitcom Show. Be sure to check them out to see what you like. The bonus sites only become apparent when you click on the "Sites" link at the top of the member page. Otherwise, you won't realize that you have acccess to the bonus sites.
-Newer videos have your choice of definition from 270p through 4K. For both streaming and downloading.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Unlimited streaming and downloading, as far as I can tell.
-Your choice of downloading a photo set of each video, in small, medium or high definition.
-The site also has a screen cap set of each video.
CONS(START OF):
The cons are minor. This is an excellent site.
-Lots of ads. You have an ad-only page when you enter the site, plus ads on every member page.
But some of the site ad prices are low, and might be worth considering.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
The bonus sites:
Fantasy of the Month is still updating.
Girls Only Porn is still updating.
Hot Crazy Mess stopped updating in January 2020.
That Sitcom Show stopped updating in September 2019.
Site stats:
804 videos.
804 photo sets (1 photo set for each video). (That's not counting the screencap set for each video.)
Videos all have 270p through 1080p versions.
4K was added in October 2020 (a very recent addition, compared to competing porn sites).
But even the first videos, back in late 2012, are clear, crisp videos with lovely models, great focus, nice sets.
-The Nubile Films videos and photo sets are clear, crisp, showcasing the model in living color. This is hardcore porn, but on the softer side. Even after watching the videos, I'd be proud to take these lovely models home with me. They look so soft and innocent.
I watch the video titled "For Her Pleasure" with Nessie Blue and Mia Trejsi, two lovely young models.
The text description for the video:
"Mia Trejsi has found a new playmate in Nessie Blue. The girls barely make it into the doorway of Mia's apartment before Mia presses Nessie against a wall to capture her lips in a kiss. Taking Nessie's hand, Mia leads her submissive new friend to the bedroom where Michael Fly is waiting to complete their hot threesome."
The video is hardcore sex, but these girls are so attractive, they make the sex seem like innocent play.
There is lesbian sex, anal play, blowjob, facial, spanking, and whatever, but it seems like good, clean fun. And the models faces are so expressive, that it shows they are really enjoying themselves, and letting the audience enjoy as well.
Maybe I'm reading more into it than what is here, except that I think the site showcases lovely young models in softcore hardcore that is a joy to watch.
I look at the screen cap photos, I can't tell the difference between the screen caps and a real photo. The screen cap sets only come in one sized zip file of 3840x2160px, but I would not know this was a screen cap set, because it looks like a very good photo set.
Actually, comparing the screen caps to the photo set, I think the photo set is slightly better focused, but even the screen caps are worth collecting. Except why have 2 photo sets of a video?
But the photo sets are definitely worth collecting. The models range from attractive to gorgeous, and the photos are excellent: well lit, nice sets, good focus, the models are lovely, the photos capture the action of the video.
Of the 4 bonus sites, only 2 are updating.
Fantasy of the Month has 1 or 2 updates per month.
The Girls Only Porn site has 3 or 4 updates per month. It's a lesbian site, featuring sex between 2 attractive models. The videos and photo sets and site layout are the same as the Nubile Films site: the videos are clear and crisp, well focused, nice sets, available in 270p through 4K(4K for the most recent videos), with associated photo sets. It's an excellent site, and a welcome addition to the Nubile Films network.
I'm giving Nubile Films a score of 95. The girls are lovely, the videos and photo sets are excellent. The site is easy to use. Plus you get the 4 bonus sites.
The main value is the Nubile Films site. But the Girls Only Porn site is a nice bonus.
I don't have a problem with the site name being Pure Taboo.
The way I see it, it's based on the idea of all sex outside of marriage as taboo. And even in marriage, sex is a duty to be performed, not enjoyed.
(The old Puritan view, which most PU members no longer believe.)
Note: I'm not saying my view is historically accurate. Some believe that Puritans could enjoy sex in marriage as a bond between husband and wife. Whatever.
The site is trying to be a cinematic version of high-grade porn, but the foolish plots can get in the way.
However, if the girl is attractive, and the sex is good, some plots can increase the impact of the scene.
Pure Taboo is my favorite site in the Adult Time network.
Navigation is simple and easy: All you have at the site are photosets (except for the small number of Staff Selection videos).
Photosets are dated.
There are some tags for the photosets.
In 2016, after MetArt took over running Domai and Goddess Nudes from the original owner, they raised the price from $10/month to $30/month or $100/year.
At $10/month, it was a worthwhile join.
For $30/month, or $100/year, I feel it's an expensive membership.
You can pay the same price, or a lower price, for many other fine photographic sites, or photo + videos sites.
So I would join Domai or Goddess Nudes once in a blue moon, if you have extra money to spend.
That's in spite of the model catalog of attractive to lovely young models.
My feeling is that MetArt has priced the site too high for what it offers.
If you want a softcore site, I would suggest joining MetArt.com.
That site blows both the Domai and Goddess Nudes sites out of the water.
MetArt stats: MetArt updates with 4 (photoset + video) per day.
Number of photosets: 22544
Number of videos: 1804
Number of models: 3831
Number of photographers: 291
The models at MetArt range from merely attractive to gorgeous. MetArt uses a more glamorous style than Goddess nudes.
The settings are more expensive, the costumes are more expensive. MetArt is probably the finest softcore teen site on the internet.
I say teen, because that's the way MetArt started out around 1999.
But they can feature models in the twenties and even in their thirties, as well.
REVIEW CONTINUES IN NEXT REPLY:
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Simple, basic, non-glamour, softcore solo photo site.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Navigation is simple, based on this is a photoset only site (except for some "Staff Selection" videos and photosets which cost extra to download).
-You get low, medium and high definition download and online viewing of the photosets.
-Unlimited downloads.
-Content is exclusive.
Cons:
-No videos (except for the limited "Staff Selection" videos, which cost extra to download.
-The number of photos per set is surprisingly small. Often less than 50 photos in a set.
-Slow update rate. Down to about 2 sets per week. Used to be 5 sets per week, years ago.
-High membership price. Used to be $10/month or less, years ago. Then, in 2016, MetArt raised the price to $30/month or $100/year.
-No bonus sites (except for the live cam shows).
-The photos are high quality, but use a simple, basic style: solo female model, very simple indoor or outdoor setting, non-glamour. A set can start out with a girl wearing inexpensive clothes, or can start out with the girl already nude. But it's not a tease or strip, you are just viewing nude photos of the girl walking around, lying on the floor, I mean, very simple poses.
-Pre-ckecked cross-sale on join page.
I think of myself as a meat and potatoes guy. Maybe a purist or connoisseur could tell the difference between the two sites. I can't tell. To me, both sites are essentially similar. The main difference is that the two sites have different names. But any content from one site could have been posted in the other site.
In the same manner, All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn are three different sites. Sharing many or most of the same models. Sharing many or most of the same themes: teen female nudity and sex, softcore and hardcore. The content at any one of the three sites could have been posted at the other two sites. To illustrate this point, a video posted at one site has, in the past, had the accompanying photoset (the photoset that was made during the shooting of the video) posted at the other site: For example a Wow Girls video had the photoset made during that video shoot posted at Wow Porn. And vice versa. So the sites not only shared many or most of the same models, but also shared the same themes, photographers, technical crew, etc.
The above is not a criticism of any of sites I mentioned. Domai and Goddess Nudes are fine sites.
All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn are fine sites, and the three sites are one of my favorite porn networks. Currently, the three sites are marketed as a single network: you join any one of the three sites, and you get access to all three sites. And for several months now, you also get access to Ultra Films, another fine site with the same models from what is now called the Wow network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn).
The Wow network used to be called the Diesel network years ago.
Wow network plus Ultra Films have been having a special for 6 months or more: you can join the Wow network and Ultra Films for $70/year. Which is a great price: I paid more than that for the Wow network, and I paid a separate membership fee for Ultra Films. And now you get all 4 sites for less than I was paying for Wow network. For less than what I paid for Ultra Films.
I'm sorry I'm going off-topic in this review. But if you haven't ever joined the Wow network before, or if you have but aren't a current member, I highly recommend joining the Wow network plus Ultra Films, if you can find the special discount of $70/year for the 4 sites.
That's if you are a fan of lovely young teens in hardcore action. With some softcore content, as well, but mainly hardcore action.
Going back to Goddess Nudes. Goddess Nudes is softcore nudity.
Like Domai, Goddess Nudes is photoset only. No videos.
Let me explain about the no videos statement: there are a few videos at the site. But they are listed as "Staff Selection". This means that to download any Staff Selection video you have to pay extra to download it. The same Staff Selection videos are also posted at all the MetArt network sites. So the Staff Selection videos are a feature of the MetArt network of sites, and not basically a feature of any one individual MetArt network site.
Also, if you are a lifetime member of any MetArt network site, you can download all the Staff Selection videos, without paying extra. But that's only if you are a lifetime member.
To become a lifetime member of any MetArt network site, you normally have to pay $400 to $800, which is a one-time fee. Lifetime members of a site have free access to that site.
With full lifetime streaming and downloading privileges.
The same setup and features of Domai are repeated at Goddess Nudes: you get limited physical data on the models, but no bios.
The update rate used to be 5 updates per week. The same as Domai.
But like Domai, the rate has slowed to about 2 updates per week.
Most of the models are slender white girls, late teens or early twenties.
From the website, the following stats are shown:
Number of photosets: 2634
Number of models: 1143
Contributing photographers: 143
Photosets contain from 30 to 100 or more photos. But most sets are under 50 photos.
The photography is excellent, but it uses a simple, non-glamorous style: Not a lot of make-up on the models, the clothing is simple, not expensive.
You get a mix of indoor and outdoor shoots.
Strictly softcore. Solo women only photoshoots. No men allowed.
REVIEW CONTINUES IN THE FIRST REPLY SECTION:
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Large amount of content. Domai was started back in 1997, so it was one of the earliest softcore photo sites on the internet.
-Instead of the high-gloss glamour style offered by many photo sites, Domai gives you basic nude softcore photos of young women (18 years old and older). Very little air-brushing that I could tell.
-The girls are mainly attractive to very attractive. Many of them are featured in other MetArt sites, as well as other photo sites.
-You get many of the same contributing photographers from the MetArt network, so you do get some variety of photographers, except that the overall style is simple nudes, simple costumes, nothing glamourous or exotic. Strictly softcore.
-There is a zip file for photoset downloads in low, medium, and high definition.
-Content is exclusive.
-There is a nice mix of indoor and outdoor sets.
-Codec for the photosets is efficient. The high-definition downloads are less than 300 MB, and the low-definition downloads are usually 10 MB or less
Cons:
-The main con is the price. Domai used to be, many years ago, a low-priced site (less than $10/month) that offered softcore nude photos. But it's now a fully priced site. $29.99/month, or $99.99/year. As a low-priced site, it was worth joining, because it has a large collection of nude models shot in a simple, non-glamorous style. But as a full-priced site, I would hesitate to join, because there are so many competing sites offering glamour-style photography.
-Photo only site. No videos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join.
-They are running out of new photosets, so they are using some older content shot years ago.
But unless you've been a longtime porn addict, you probably won't realize that some of the content is old.
-The online slide-show mechanism is acceptable, but could be improved. You get a cropped photo with a large amount of black-space on both sides of the photo.
-Only basic data is provided on a model. Model's age when the set was posted, a few physical attributes. That's it.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Note: the downloaded model data sheet says the age shown is the age of the model when the set was shot. But it's really the age of the model when the set was posted. Which is obvious if you've followed some of these models, who look like teens in the photos, but the stated age is in their 30s. So unless these models have discovered the fountain of youth, you figure the site (and many other sites, due to covid) are using old content and posting it as new updates.
-Due to covid, the rate has slowed. It used to update 5 days a week, but now it's one new update every 3 or 4 days.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Domai offers a non-glamourous, basic softcore approach. Many years ago I was a member off and on. The catalog of models was the main attraction, combined with a low-priced membership.
But since MetArt took over the site from the original founder (Eolake Stobblehouse), they've raised the membership price, and it's now as expensive or more expensive than most glamour-style photo sites.
So in spite of the attractive models, I would hesitate to join the site.
Unless you're tired of the glamour-style approach many photosites use, and want something more basic.
Domain is a photo only site, no videos. So that could be a negative for some.
Also, the site is extreme softcore only. No masturbation or explicit scenes.
Site design is simple and basic. Which makes navigation easy.
Back when the original founder was running the site, it used to have more features: short erotic fiction, articles on how to enjoy life and erotic photography, a loyalty program to make membership even cheaper. But that was all dropped after MetArt took over.
Because some of the models are so lovely, and many of the rest are attractive, the site might be worth joining for a month or so.
But there is too much competition, both softcore and hardcore, for this site to stand out.
I'm giving the site a score of 85. Because I have fond memories of the site. But the price ($29.99/month) makes it expensive.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-X Empire is a small network of 5 sites. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all 5 sites.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-You can choose your login details (username and password). Making them easy to remember.
-You get 2 confirming emails on sign-up. Stating your login details, and the terms of your membership.
-Customer service is 24/7, by live chat, phone, and email. Live chat responds within a few minutes.
-Navigation is easy. The sites are laid out clearly. You can sort by site, category (type of sex you want), model, or latest or highest rated video.
-Content is exclusive.
Cons:
-X Empire is part of Gamma Entertainment, but they use a different biller, and support service from Adult Time. However, I assume the biller and support are first-rate, because it's part of Gamma Entertainment. The biller is olifehelp.
-This is a minor con. You have to login through the site you joined through. You can't login through any of the other sites in the network, or login through the main network.
-Membership can be streaming only, or streaming plus downloads. The streaming only membership is cheaper. Read what type of membership you are signing up for, which is not always made clear on the join page. I suggest using live chat to confirm whether you are getting downloads included.
-The public pages give you almost no information about the network, or any of the sites.
No sample videos, no model listing, nothing useful to determine whether the site is worth joining.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The Best Porn states there is a 300 GB daily limit for downloads.
Bottom Line:
Number of videos: around 1400.
Number of photosets: around 2200.
Number of photos per set: 140-200+
Newer videos can be streamed (and downloaded, if you have downloads) 360p through 4K.
The 4K option was added a few years ago.
You have 5 sites in the network.
-All Black X features black performers. Mainly male black on female black, but there are a few where it's solo black, or female black on female black.
-Dark X features a black guy on a white woman. But there are a few videos where you have 2 black men on a white woman.
Hard X features slightly more extreme sex. The largest site in the network, with 639 videos.
Lesbian X is a lesbian site, mainly white models.
The production values for the videos is good to excellent. The videos are crisp and clear images, good lighting, good colors. The models range from OK to very nice. But don't expect the models to compare to a glamcore site like the Vixen-Tushy sites, where the models are presented like movie stars. Even when you have the same models appearing at the X Empire and at the Vixen-Tushy sites, the models look so much better at Vixen-Tushy. Vixen-Tushy just makes videos with highest-quality production values (expensive sets, great lighting, expensive costumes, and a selection of models that ranges from lovely to fucking gorgeous).
The network has a lot of black performers (male and female).
And I like the Erotic X site, which uses a glamcore approach.
Navigation is easy.
There's advertising on every page, but that's standard for porn sites. Along with the pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
I'm giving X Empire a score of 85.
It's a worthwhile join, especially if you catch a holiday discount.
Sorry.
I don't mean to be picky.
But your count of pinkerton is not correct.
Currently, he has 7 approved reviews.
Plus apparently 3 extra points.
So his tally should be 38 points.
Somehow, your spreadsheet is overlooking one of his reviews.
Unless you didn't approve one of his reviews, for some reason, and it didn't earn any points.
But count the number of reviews pinkerton has submitted from 04-16-21 on. Currently, that's 7 reviews.
I'm assuming they were all approved.
But maybe one of his recent reviews hasn't been approved yet.
Or, what seems more likely, one of his approved reviews has been omitted from the tally.
Again, my apologies, I just want the count to be correct.
I just realized that the link that states "Download this video" is due to Internet Download Manager, a payable download manager.
The download option is not from the site itself, but from the download manager I am using.
Sorry for the confusion.
The link to download just pops up on my desktop, and I thought it was the site that was allowing me downloads.
But it was the Internet Download Manager program that was providing the link, and the ability to download videos from this site (and from other sites, as well).
I should re-write my review of this site.
All the professional reviews of this site state the site is streaming only, no downloads allowed.
I don't know if this is a recent change, but downloads are allowed at the site. With a regular membership. You don't have to pay extra for downloads.
Just find the link that says, "Download this video", and you can use a download manager to download.
That increases the value of the site significantly.
I plan to rewrite my review, as soon as I find the time.
But I did edit the review, to show that downloads are allowed, with a regular membership, for no extra charge.
And increased the site score to 93.
The site is not perfect, but for a very low price, you are given access to 3000+ hardcore videos covering a wide range of niches.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Note:
I want to explain that I am being easy in this review because I paid a low membership price.
Some PU members think that membership price should either not be mentioned in a review, or else considered as a minor factor.
I disagree.
The membership price is a major factor for this site, because you are paying a low fee to access over 3000 hardcore videos, over 1100 models. The site is certainly not perfect, but the operators are working to improve the site, as well as giving you a wide range of hardcore niches.
That slant colors this review.
If you don't agree that price can be a major factor in the value of a site, then you should probably ignore the review.
PROS(START OF):
-The main pro is the low membership price.
There is a PU discount for $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $14.95/month.
I believe there are holiday discounts for even lower prices.
-The network is like a tiny Adult Time network: you get access to 3015 hardcore videos and 1136 models.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The videos come from over 70 different sites, so it's like a sampling of those sites. For a very low price, you should be able to find plenty of videos to watch.
-Most or all of the video content is available in hd quality.
-The site is easy to navigate, and you can search by site, category, tags, model name, video title, etc. They also list the sites offered, plus categories.
-Members can leave comments on scenes.
-You can have a favorites list, which is useful with over 3000 videos to search and choose from.
-You can also make your own personal play list.
-Epoch, Vendo and Segpay are the billers, which are first rate and dependable.
-Can pay with a credit card, paypal, or crypto.
-There is a model listing.
-With over 70 sites contributing, the number of niches offered is large:
teen, MILF, masturbation, handjobs, solo, twosomes, group sex, straight fucking, anal, fisting, lesbian, blow jobs, peeing, spy glasses, cuckolds, stocking fetish, dildos and other toys.
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Good update rate. 22 videos added this week.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-A special way to improve your account security. You can choose to enable two-factor authentification. If enabled, you will be emailed a unique code each time you try to login to the site. The code will allow you to enter the members area. Seems like over-kill to me.
CONS(START OF):
-The main con is this network is streaming only. No downloads.
-By default, it shows your user ID if you make a comment. The user ID is your email address. So create a nickname before your make any comments on the videos, or else you are exposing your email address.
-Only some content is dated. So you can't tell what the update rate is.
The public page often tells you how many new videos were added to the network in the current week.
Also, I believe the dating process started recently, so most of the content is not dated.
-Cancelling could be easier. You can submit a ticket asking to cancel. But I think it's easier to cancel through your biller. So save your confirmation emails.
-The content is non-exclusive. If you're into porn, you've probably seen a lot of the content featured at this network.
-Videos often don't list the names of the models in the video.
-Many videos are in a foreign language, with no subtitles. But the dialogue is usually unimportant in this type of hardcore.
-Videos often lack tags, a text description, or a trailer.
Edit: Hit the "Show More" link to bring up the brief text description, tags, model name, etc.
But many videos don't show the model name, even after hitting the "Show More" link.
-Most videos have a choice of 480p and 1080p. Which is OK, but not great.
-I tried joining through Vendo, but was rejected several times. Then I tried to join through Epoch, and was accepted the first try. Vendo had no pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. Epoch did have a pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Network stats
Videos: 3012
Video runtime varies: from 20 minutes to about 1 hour.
Models: 1136
Contributing sites: 70+
Photo sets: 295
Number of photos per set: 100+
-This is a streaming-only network.
So there are two main ways to use it:
1. A low-cost intro to over 70 different sites, to see which sites you might want to join.
2. A low-cost source of hardcore videos, from a wide variety of niches, from a wide variety of sites (over 70 different sites have contributed content to this network).
For a low price of $10 or less for the first month, this site is worth joining to see how many videos you want to watch. There are no downloads. But if you like what you find, and there's plenty of content from a wide variety of niches, a low-cost year's membership might make sense. Because there's no way you can sample over 3000 videos in a month or even a few months.
I know that most PU members want downloading privileges to join a site.
But some of the low prices I've seen for a year's membership make this a worthwhile join.
rabbitsreviews lists a first year membership of $48, which seems cheap as dirt.
(PU lists a first year membership of $60. So go with the rabbitsreviews discount.)
Consider this site as a low-rent version of most hardcore porn sites, except that it's not the low-rent that many hardcore sites were around 2000 or earlier: the videos are mainly acceptable or OK, not the high gloss videos at the Wow sites, the X-Art site, the Blacked-Tushy-Vixen sites. It's a trade-off: you're paying a low price, and getting a lower-quality hardcore product, but not the cheap videos made around 2000 with cheap sets, cheap production values, poor lighting.
The site has plenty of ads. You can ignore them, or you might find some of the ads have a low price that's worth considering.
I'm giving the site a score 93.
For a low price, you're getting access to some good content. But it depends on your willingness to scan through a lot of material that won't appeal to your individual tastes.
Edit:
I have downloaded videos from this site. The downloads were done through a shareware download manager, not from the site's function. My mistake. Reducing the site score to 90.
I just started using the download manager, and didn't realize I was using the program to do downloads. Thought I was using the site software, until I realized the download link was popping up for other sites, as well at the Filth Flix site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The site is part of the X Empire network of 5 sites.
So you get access to 5 sites with your membership.
-The good-quality photosets have a zip file.
-There are model indexes: one for the network, a different index for each individual site.
-The model's page has links to her videos.
-There is a cheaper streaming membership. Downloads require a more expensive membership.
-Videos come with lots of tags describing the video. They have a text description of the video that's so brief it's worthless.
For example, the complete text description for a Scarlit Scandal video is: "Scarlit Scandal loves her ass spanked while she's being fucked and Jax Slayher makes sure to turn Scarlit's cheeks red as he plunges his piece deep into her pussy." The tags do a much better job describing the video.
-Members can add comments on the model's page. Useless, except for fans wanting to show their appreciation of the model.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-No information for the models (except for a generic name).
-Ads on member pages. Easy to ignore, because they are placed at the bottom of the page.
-Most of the models at the site are White, but there are a few Black, Asian, and Latina models.
Bottom Line:
The site is based on real life events (I read that from a motion picture, but it adds meaning to the sex shown in these videos: think of your sister, your mother, your grandmother, exploding with lust when they are with the women of their dreams.)
The site theme is lesbian sex.
The sex featured at Lesbian X is young teens and MILFs, so you get a mix of young teens and attractive older women.
The site has 140 videos.
Videos have your choice of definition from 360p through 4K. The 4K option was added a few years back for the newer posted videos. Before that, the highest resolution was 1080p.
You can stream the full video, or a trailer for video.
There is an accompanying photoset for each video.
Photosets range from 99 photos to over 400 photos.
The soundtrack for many of the videos is an overpowering music beat. Either turn the volume down, or mute the volume and put on the song "I Want To Know What Love Is" by Foreigner, to heighten the mood. That song is a much better background than the canned music in these lesbian videos.
The videos are standard lesbian videos: lots of kissing, licking, sucking, stroking, some use of toys. The models are surprisingly clean: not a lot of tattoos, not a lot of models with over-large breast implants. The sets and costumes are nice.
I thought the lesbian videos were pretty much plain vanilla: although the models are making lots of noises to show excitement, the videos lack real heat. I've seen some videos at Teen Fidelity, Rocco Siffredi or other sites that had real heat. That I thought were arousing.
Lesbian X is a different approach where the performers are acting more naturally. However, when I say they are acting more naturally, what I mean is that these models are role-playing for cash, there's little or no real passion. In spite of the moans and groans and squirting.
I'm giving the site a score of 78.
The site doesn't impress me much.
Although the models are clean and attractive, the models at other sites can be more attractive.
The update rate is slow and irregular: There have been 9 new videos in the last 12 months.
The content is exclusive.
Navigation is easy.
But there's little that's exciting to watch at this site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the X Empire network.
You get access to 5 sites with your membership.
All Black X, Dark X, Erotica X, Hard X, Lesbian X.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-You can choose your login details, so easily remembered username and password.
-The site and network is easy to navigate.
-The extra-large thumbnails illustrating the videos at the site are clear and crisp, giving you a fine idea of what the model and the stunt cock look like.
-The large thumbnails are actually gifs: hold your mouse over a thumbnail, and you get a very brief action-view of the model, watch her breasts flop around, her ass jiggle as she gets pounded by a black cock. The downside is I'm into young teens with slender bodies, and the models here are mainly 20-30 year old models with normal-sized bodies that look more like porn stars instead of attractive young girls. Fans of the site call the models beautiful, but this is not my idea of beauty.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
Even models that I think are pretty are presented as sluts at this site.
-Note: I am referring to the models at the Dark X site. The models at the other network sites are presented as attractive young women.
-All content is exclusive.
-Live chat is fast to respond, less than 2 minutes wait time.
-All videos stream and download from 288p through 1080p. The newest videos have a 4K option.
CONS(START OF):
-Sometimes have to pass through an ad-filled page to get to the members area.
-Every members page has ads, but ads are easily ignored.
-I'm being picky, but I think the prices for the sites in the ads are too high.
-The Best Porn states there is a daily download limit of 300GB. Which seems like a minor con to me. Who downloads 300GB in a day?
-The major con for me is I don't appreciate the style or approach of the videos. I enjoy the videos at the Wow network, Teen Mega World, X-Art.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
But at this site, the idea is you're looking at young women who want to fuck with a Black man, because it's somehow forbidden (even though it's perfectly legal today for whites and blacks to have sex). Sucking a black dick. Having a black cock up a white girl's ass. I don't buy this fantasy.
-Irregular update rate. Anywhere from 1 to 5 new videos per month.
-You can easily request a copy of your live chat. Except I did request a copy, the site stated a chat copy was sent to my email address, and I never got it (I checked inbox and spam box and never got a copy).
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Site has 244 videos.
-Video runtime is 20 to 40 minutes.
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded in the following definitions: 360p through 4K.
Note: I joined for $5 for 30 days, so I didn't have downloading privileges.
Even when my membership renewed at $19.95/month, I didn't have download privileges. That would cost about $10/month more.
I do have unlimited streaming.
-Site features inter-racial porn, where black men fuck white women.
I'm over 70, so I can recall where, mainly in the Southern United States, racial segregation was practiced: separate drinking fountains for white and black, blacks not allowed to use white-only restrooms, or to eat inside white-only restaurants.
I grew up in California, in Los Angeles county, so segregation was not so obviously practiced. But I remember we only had 1 black kid in our high school. No laws preventing him from using any facility a white person would use, but you might argue that 1 black kid in a public school population of around 300 was practical segregation.
Black men having sex with white women is a popular niche. I guess it's based on the old taboo prohibiting black men from having sex with white women.
So it can be shocking or add an element of lust for interracial sex.
(I don't know why we don't have lots of sites where white men fuck Asian women, since there was a lot of racial discrimination against Asians.)
I was roommates with a Chinese guy in the 1970s.
I was roommates with a Black guy in the 1970s.
Both of them had sex with white women.
It was nothing explosive or scandalous.
It was just normal sex.
So I don't buy into the fantasy that a white woman having sex with a black man is evil. Blacked.com and blackedraw.com are more my style, because they take attractive young women, make them even more attractive, and pair them with one or more black guys. But the tone is very different from the Dark X site.
Porn is fantasy. A lot of times, you need to shut down your brain to enjoy the show.
Except that I want good-looking teens, not porn stars looking like sluts.
I have nothing against black stunt cocks. But it just seems stupid to me that a white woman touching a black man's cock is ready to explode with lust.
Which is the fantasy that the Dark X site is promoting.
I'm giving the Dark X site a score of 78.
Blacked has the following advantages over Dark X:
The production values are much higher.
The models are presented much more attractively.
The update rate is much faster.
Blacked is a high-class act. Dark X falls short.
I would definitely choose Blacked over Dark X.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Low membership price:
With a PU discount, first month is $14.95, recurs at $29.95/month.
But PU has a discounted price of $59.95/year (recurring).
-3,100+ scenes for the network.
-The network has current updates (around 2 new videos per week).
-The billing processors are Segpay, Epoch and Vendo, all trusted names.
-Network provides access to 17 sites.
-Free lifetime access for ex-members. Ex-members still get limited access to network content.
-They recently updated the login to a secure page (https). But the member pages are still not secure.
-Most content is exclusive.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
Cons:
-Although login is now secure, the member pages are not secure.
-The homepage and video listing is out-dated. The thumbnails are small, need to be brighter and more attractive, to make the content more appealing. This is basic marketing: the videos themselves can be poor to very good, but they deserve a more appealing presentation.
-Member pages have ads on every page.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
This is a teen-orientated network. Almost all the models are late teens, early 20s.
Many of them are cute or attractive.
You will find many of the same models at other teen networks like Teen Mega World, Wow network, even some at the Metart network.
There are 17 sites in the network. So the sites cover a wide range of teen niches. Most of the sites are archives that haven't updated in years.
The newer vidoes have a 4K definition download option. Videos from about 4 years old and older mainly have a 720p or 1080p download option. The videos from Jun 2009 have a resolution of 320x240p through 720x576p. The streaming for the videos prior to that date is limited to 240p or 480p.
A lot of the oldest videos are not worth watching or collecting. The problems are poor lighting, poor focus and cheap sets. The lighting is so dim in some early videos it's difficult to see what the model looks like.
The older photosets are also not worth collecting. They are screencaps, with poor lighting, poor focus, cheap sets, cheap costumes (the costumes are cheap street clothes that look like they were bought at a rummage sale). The earliest videos are even worse than the earliest videos at Teen Mega World, which also started out as a low-rent teen hardcore network, but even when Teen Mega World was starting out, with low-rent clothes, low rent settings, they still did a better job with their videos and photosets than the 18videoz network. And as time went on, the Teen Mega World network spent their profits on better lighting, better equipment, to make the videos and photosets have higher production values, so that today, the Teen Mega World videos and photosets are good to excellent, and are just a few steps below the Wow network videos and photosets. Teen Mega World is one of my favorite hardcore teen networks, just below the Wow network. The models at Wow network are among the finest looking teens on the internet, and the production values, the clear crisp videos and photosets are borderline glamour in quality and style.
For teen hardcore porn, Teen Mega World and the Wow network are my two favorite networks.
I'm giving the 18Videoz network a score of 82.
Negatives are that most of the sites stopped updating years ago.
The network only updates with 1 new video every 3 or 4 days.
The videos and photosets have improved over time. But there's too much old content that is ultra-low quality.
The low membership price is one of the strengths of the network.
But I prefer Teen Mega World network and the Wow network over the 18Videoz network.
Bottom line:
The 18Videoz network should deserve a higher score. There are some really cute models at the network. And there are some worthwhile videos to see. But there's too much trash that buries the good videos, so it's really hit or miss if you want to find the better quality videos at the network.
I've listed the 17 sites you get access to in the 18Videoz network in the first reply to this review:
I've read that the after-effects of covid can be dangerous.
Which your story illustrates.
I've got a $50 paypal payment to you in honor of your wedding.
That I wish you would accept.
Take your wife out for lunch, or buy something useful.
Whatever.
(I would send the paypal payment to your gmail address, if that's still active.)
Wishing you the best.
Glad you've come back to the PU site.
But it's your decision, of course, to stick with PU or not.
Welcome back.
Excellent review, as usual, good overview and fine details.
Your presence makes the site a more interesting and informative place to visit.
We've lost a lot of good members the last few years.
Hoping everything is well with you.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Adult Time network.
-Site has 138 videos.
-The selection of models is first-rate: cute young teens and 20-year-old models.
-Login and member pages are secure(https).
-Customer support is first rate: 24/7 live chat, telephone, email.
-Videos are available for streaming and download in your choice of definition: 288p through 2160p.
-Members are allowed to comment, favorite videos, models, photosets. They leave negative comments on the site, unlike some sites that remove negative comments.
-There is a brief text description of the video, and the tags do a good job describing the action.
Cons:
-Navigation is the main con. There's so much content at the network (over 50,000 videos and almost as many photosets), that it's difficult to find the content that appeals to you.
That's good and bad: good, that you can find a lot of good to excellent hardcore videos; bad, because there will be a lot of content that doesn't fit your tastes.
-I wish there was a model listing for each individual channel, instead of a network model listing. You have over 13,500 models at the network. So the model listing is not helpful finding what models are included in a particular channel. I mean, you click on a model's thumbnail, it will show you what sites she appears in. But I want a simple listing of the models that appear at each channel.
Bottom Line:
-Jay is the role model of the father I always wanted to be:
He cares about his step-daughters.
When he catches them taking nude selfies on their phones, he tells them how concerned he is about their welfare. What if some pervert posts the pictures on the internet? The innocent girls' lives would be ruined.
Also, even though he admits he's not their real father, he says he has to know whether they are taking birth control pills: after all, you don't want a bunch of naked bastards running through the house without proper supervision.
Jay is a man I can really admire.
Also, Jay turns out to be a man with a sex drive.
He can often be found on his bed wanking off to the pictures of his naked step-daughters.
They are step-daughters, so it's not real incest.
In some states, a step-father may not legally have sex with his step-daughter, even if the sex was consensual. It's still called incest.
But in Jays POV, he believes that a little romance between a step-father and a step-daughter can bring them closer together.
Jay is a man who appreciates that step-daughters are often younger than the women he's married, so that adds freshness and spice to the sex.
Jay has a say in his household. He's not trying to take the place of their real dad, but he needs to be involved in the lives of his step-daughters. So if a step-daughter has any questions on sex, how to give a blow job, or whether anal sex is better than vaginal sex, Jay is the man to ask.
Jay is also willing to demonstrate his experience with his step-daughters, especially if they are young and cute and attractive.
Some of his step-daughters are unsure about Jay's rules, but Jay is such a smooth talker, that he soon convinces even the most uncertain girls that he is the man in charge.
Jay has practical advice for his girls: don't go by the videos you see on the internet.
They often give erroneous ideas about sex.
Sex should be between two warm, loving partners. Jay is a warm, loving partner.
Guys like Jay like their sex slow. Slow to start, then he can start pounding away as soon as the girl is warmed up.
Since Jay is married to their mothers, the sex between Jay and the girls is a secret because Jay doesn't want any problems with the women he married.
In conclusion, Jays POV is a teaching aid for people who want to marry women with step-daughters.
First, make sure it's legal to have sex with your step-daughter in the state you're living in.
Second, make sure you pick a woman with an attractive daughter. There's no sense fucking an unattractive step-daughter.
Third, tell the girl you're doing it for her own good. You want to teach her the joys of sex.
Much better than an inexperienced teen boy who doesn't know how to handle a young woman.
Be firm, be autoritative.
The step-daughter will learn valuable life lessons, while you get the benefit of teaching a young pussy how to fuck.
A classic win-win for everyone.
And if the mother does find out, tell her you did it for the daughter's sake.
Jays POV is an excellent site.
It gives you valuable life lessons on how to treat your stepdaughters.
The videos are clear and crisp, and the step-daughter models are young and attractive.
And once Jay gets into bed with them, due to Jay's coaching, they are soon able to give expert blowjobs. And to fuck like bitches in heat.
Be like Jay, and make sure when selecting a wife, that the stepdaughter is young, cute, and will fill your afternoons with sinful sex.
I'm giving the site a score of 85.
That's due to Jay being the pervert I always wanted to be, and for filming his experiences in such clear, crisp videos with these lovely young pussies.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Site features black models and black men. A special niche, because most sites featuring blacks are white models with black men.
-PU has discounted prices to the All Black X site:
$14.95 for the first month, recurring at $29.95/mo.
$95.40/year.
Note: if you use the PU link to go to the X Empire network, the yearly membership option is $89.95/year.
-Login and member pages are secure(https).
-Site loads easily.
-Very large thumbnails for video listing of contents, which are really gifs that show you a tiny preview of the action. The Gifs are impressive: large, well-lit images that clearly show you the male and female performers in action.
-Small site (only 37 videos), so the navigation is easy.
-Photosets: can hold anywhere from 100 to 500 photos.
The photos have good focus, good lighting, nice sets, good colors. They are worth collecting.
-I don't have downloading privileges for the videos (I joined on a $5 special for the first month).
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
But I do have downloading privileges for the photosets, and unlimited streaming for the videos.
-I have access to all 5 sites in the network.
-Support is live chat and email. No telephone support that I could find.
-Login and member pages are secure(https).
-You can choose your login details (username and password), so it's easy to remember.
-The network models are attractive, and some of them have appeared at other sites, even at Metart sites.
CONS(START OF):
-The site (and network) has a slow, irregular update rate.
The site has 1 update per month.
The network averages 2 updates per week.
-The Best Porn states there is a daily download limit of 200GB.
That is a minor con, because 200GB is a large amount of data.
-Photos download with a generic file number. You have to manually rename the zip file with the model's name, site name, date posted, title of the set.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Only 1 definition zip file for each photoset.
-Although I have access to all 5 sites in the network, I have to login through the site I joined at: entering my login details at other sites in the network gives me an error message.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Membership in the X Empire network gives you access to 5 sites.
All Black X
Dark X Erotica X Hard X
Lesbian X
The All Black X site stats:
Video definition: 288p through 2160p.
Number of videos: 37
Number of models: 33
An individual photoset can hold anywhere from 74 to 500+ photos.
Individual photo details: 1280 x 1920 pixels.
Individual photo resolution: 96 x 96 dpi.
The photos are good quality: real photos, not screencaps.
Almost all of the videos are a black man and a black woman having sex.
There are 2 videos of a woman with 2 men.
There is one video of 2 women with one man.
There is one lesbian video of 2 women.
There are tags to describe the action, and a very short text description of the slender plot. The plot usually goes like this: a female and male met and fuck. Very little setup.
Although they divide the content into 5 sites, the videos themselves don't carry a logo showing what site they belong to. Nor does the short text description tell you what site the video belongs to.
The site shows you how a female prepares to meet a strange male: First she fluffs her hair with her hands, scrubs her teeth with a finger, exposes her breasts so she can tweek her nipples and breasts, covers her breasts back up, and then goes to meet the man.
I plan to install a hidden camera the next time I meet up with a gorgeous woman, to see if this happens in real life.
The site and network is good to excellent.
Network is part of Gamma Entertainment, which owns Adult Time network, but this network (and site) are completely separate from the Adult Time network. It even uses a different billing and support team from Adult Time. I don't know why, because I think the Adult Time billing and support team are excellent.
This is a personal issue: if I didn't have too many porn memberships already, I would spend more time at this site and network.
The photosets and videos are excellent. The style is reality porn, where they have a plot to set up the sex action. The models are attractive, the sets are nice. Not super-glamourous, but very nice locations. The videos are clear and crisp, well videotaped, good lighting, good sound control. The background music is good, not loud or jarring.
This is a small site that probably started about a year ago.
You only have 37 videos so far.
Current update rate is 1 video per month.
Maybe the site will grow faster once the covid epidemic has gone.
This is a personal issue, but I have too many porn memberships at this time. I don't have enough time to spend at this network. The network offers high-quality videos and photosets, with some very attractive models. But there are too many other fine-to-great networks that compete with this network.
I'm giving the site (and network) a score of 88.
If I was new to porn, I could grade it higher.
Maybe I'm jaded, I like the site and network, but there's too much competition from other sites for me to spend much money or time at this network.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
