If you're paying with a credit card, the charge and the telephone number for rocketgate should be listed on your monthly credit card statement.
Rocketgate is a lessor known payment processor, but it is still reputable. There shouldn't be any false charges. MetArt (and it's network sites) sometime use rocketgate.
I have a recurring sub through one of the MetArt sites that is handled by rocketgate.
UMBAR,
If you do join Nubiles Porn, make sure you visit (or put in a lot time at) Nubiles.net.
Several PU members have stated Nubiles.net is not part of Nubiles Porn.
That is wrong.
Personally, I think that Nubiles.net is the prime jewel of the Nubiles Porn network. Nubiles.net is more like an encyclopedia of porn starlets, most of them at the early stage of their porn career.
It has thousands of models, with a few photo sets and videos for each model.
I think the content at that site goes back to around 2004.
So it gives you a small amount of content for a lot of very young porn starlets.
Once you join Nubiles Porn, you can either access Nubiles.net directly, with the the same login details that lets you into Nubiles Porn.
Or you can use the drop-down menu, that is located in the upper right corner of the Nubiles Porn home page, that lists all the sites you have access to with a membership in Nubiles Porn.
There are some good sites in the Nubiles Porn network.
But my favorite site is Nubiles.net, because I enjoy looking over the models to see what they looked like when they were first starting out.
Also, if you look around, you can often find a discount to Nubiles Porn, or to Nubiles.net, both of which give you access to the entire Nubiles Porn network.
The discounts are common at holidays, throughout the year.
Joining any one of the network sites gives you access to all the sites in the Nubiles Porn network.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Note: this review is based on the Adult Time channel of My Pervy Family.
There is a separate site for My Pervy Family, that is has more content than the My Pervy Family channel at Adult Time. But the stand-alone My Pervy Family is basically a streaming-only site. You can buy downloads at the My Pervy Family site, but that becomes very expensive. And the streaming-only membership is not cheap to begin with: See the bottom line section of this review for more details on why the My Pervy Family site is expensive.
-Video definition runs from 160p or 288p through 2160p.
-The sets are nice and clean: no low-rent apartments, normal clothes. Good lighting.
-There is a plot or story to the videos: it's like POV, you're watching these people interact with each other. It's not all sex, it's also people living together, trying to get along. The sex is the main selling point, of course, but the stories can be interesting or funny.
-Support is FameSupport, one of the finest support teams.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
Support is 24/7. With live chat, email, telephone.
I recommend the live chat option, fast response.
-Videos download with default filename of title, model, definition. You only have to add channel and posting date.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale.
-Payment processor is proprietary, part of fameaid, but it's a solid processor, and I've dealt with them for years and never had a problem.
-My Pervy Family uses a POV filming style, which can be jumpy. My guess is they need a more professional guy at the camera, or a better editor.
-There is a 300 GB daily limit for downloads. Which is a huge amount of data to download in a single day.
-No text description of the video. No tags to describe the video (for search or sort).
-There's so much content at Adult Time, that navigating the channel and network can have problems. They really need to have an expert re-design the network to make navigation easier. They keep adding, not just new content to each channel,
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
but new channels as well. They are more focused on creating a massive porn network instead of making the content easier to find and use. The network was massive almost from the beginning when it was first created, and it's like a fucking monster that is spreading its tentacles in all directions, without a basic structure that is easy to use. Trying to get a simple chronlogical listing of the contents of each channel is a task for an expert: I would use the network more if I could find the content I want to see more easily.
-No bio on the models.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
PU and TBP sites show a discounted price of $24.99/month and $99.99/year for the My Pervy Family site.
But if you use the links from PU and TBP to go to the My Pervy Family site, the join page shows $24.99/month and $75/6 months. And that is for streaming only.
Downloads cost extra, and you have to pay for each download, there is no upgrade for unlimited downloads.
If you join Adult Time, you have unlimited streaming and downloads for the My Pervy Family channel.
The Adult Time channel for My Pervy Family has most of the video content of the My Pervy Family site.
So unless you are a real fan of the My Pervy Family site, the better choice is to join Adult Time, and you get unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads of most of the My Pervy Family videos.
Plus you get a boatload of additional hardcore porn that is very high quality with an Adult Time membership.
Note: Adult Time does have a streaming-only membership, for a lower price. But I recommend joining Adult Time with the yearly term, because I believe Adult Time is one of the best bargains in hardcore porn today.
I am an especial fan of the Pure Taboo channel at Adult Time, I think it's the finest plot-driven porn site on the internet. Pure Taboo features twisted desires with a cinematic approach, with high production values and excellent acting for a porn site.
I did a review of the Filthy POV channel of Adult Time. That channel features twisted sex, with a trailer-trash approach. You compare Filthy POV channel with the Pure Taboo channel, and it's like comparing Ptomaine Tommy to Filet Mignon. Or if you're too young to understand the reference, it's like comparing rotting meat to fine cuisine. Pure Taboo is high class twisted-desire porn.
If you're on a budget, or even if you have plenty of cash to throw into porn, joining Adult Time to get access to most of the My Pervy Family videos, instead of joining the My Pervy Family site itself, seems like a no-brainer to me. The advantages of the My Pervy channel include lower membership price, downloading privileges, and access to a huge supply of high quality hardcore porn from the Adult Time network.
What are the main benefits of the My Pervy Family channel:
-In a world filled with pain, the channel focuses on the love between step-relatives, creating a warm feeling of how you can become a better person by caring for your loved ones.
Piper June is a young teen who feels insecure about her small boobs. But her step-brother feels her titties and says they are fine. Later, he plays with her pussy and shoots his load over her. Leaving both the brother and step-sister satisfied.
Or Melody Marks, a lovely young model with girl-next-door looks. She has a good-looking step-brother who's back from college. The next morning, he wakes her up and they talk on her bed, he's sleepy, she's missed him so much, so they start cuddling. Then kissing. Then it's not enough, and she's on top of him, and she wants more, a lovely girl, a handsome guy, one of the best scenes in the channel.
I'm giving My Pervy Family a score of 88. The models are cute teens or early twenties (as step-daughters, but you get young-old with the step-mother, step-father sex with the step-children).
The sets are nice. The technical features are good (lighting, sound, etc.). Navigation is just OK, but could be better.
Wraith0711 used to belong to Teamskeet Unlimited.
But when they raised the price this last time, he said it was too expensive for him to belong.
I thought, even before they raised the rates this last time, the price was too expensive.
There are better places to spend the money, I believe.
Just my opinion, of course.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The stand-alone Filthy POV site is streaming only. But the Adult Time channel for Filthy POV has both unlimited streaming and unlimited downloading (if you have downloading privileges with your membership in Adult Time).
-The stand-alone Filthy POV site content is supposed to be exclusive. But the Adult Time channel for Filthy POV has some content from other sites mixed in, so it's not entirely exclusive.
-All scenes are available in 360p SD through 1080p. And they are now offering 4K definition for people with ultra-high definition monitors.
-Some scenes might have a plot that adds to the interest: A brother might blackmail his stepsister into having sex. However, many of the videos at the Filthy POV channel seem to have the plot cut out, and the scenes start with off with hardcore sex, with no buildup.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Some videos have an accompanying phtoset. But the photoset is poor-quality screen shots: poor lighting, cheap sets, a limited number of screen shots per set. Not worth collecting, even when the model is cute.
-Photosets average around 15 screenshots per set.
-The level of attractiveness of the models is below average. The site is going for a trailer-trash vibe, not presenting the models as attractive women, but as sluts who are getting banged.
-There is no text description of a video.
-There are no tags to describe or define the video.
-Little to none model info.
Bottom Line:
124 videos currently.
Video runtime is from 10 to 20 minutes. My guess is that they've edited the original videos to cut out the build-up to the sex, and start many of the videos with the sex scenes. Which is both good and bad: good, for fans who want to skip the buildup and view the hardcore sex. Bad, because the the buildup could give meaning to the sex.
Without the plot build-up, the scene is just two or more bodies having sex, with very little meaning.
You have Dixie Lynn, Sofie Reyez, Karah Brooke, Jocelyn Stone, Melody Marks, cute or attractive girls, sucking cock, but there's no basis for the sex, and it gets boring fast.
I much prefer the Jays POV channel in Adult Time, which makes an effort of selecting cute teen models, and also includes a plot build-up where the stunt cock seduces the girls into having sex, or the girl seduces the guy.
The sets and costumes at Jays POV are nicer, not trying for the trailer trash vibe.
The lighting and colors of the videos at Jays POV are brighter, and the girls look so much better.
Filthy POV is a channel in the Adult Time network.
It's also a standalone site.
I'm writing about the Filthy POV channel in the Adult Time network.
Which apparently has a lot of the video content found in the separate Filthy POV site.
Note: some of the videos that are listed under the Filthy POV channel are originally from other sites.
A few from FilthyKings, RoccoSiffredi, Spizzo.com.
But most of the content is from the FilthyPOV site.
Most of the models are white, but you get some latina, some black.
Most of the models are probably in their twenties, but you get some teens, some grannies.
These models are not selected for their looks, unless you consider trailer trash as the target look.
You get a wide variety of themes in this channel, and a wide variety of female performers.
The overall theme is trailer trash: slutty models, young and old, who are showing the dirty side of sex.
Fake incest: step-relations having sex. Teen and twenty-something models having sex with young and older guys. Grannies. Lots of models with tats. Cuckold. Punishment. Blowjobs. Anal. Oversized titties. Whatever.
The models are basically shown as sluts who like their sex down and dirty.
No attempt is made to make the models attractive or glamorous.
There are a few cute teen models in the catalog who seem to have wandered into the site by mistake, but
they show they belong in this site because they have fake-incest with their step family or show other perversions.
If you're into dirty sex, perverted sex, then you can watch in 4K video, which should satisfy connoisseurs of raw hardcore porn.
I'm giving the Filthy POV channel a score of 78. I don't appreciate the trailer-trash vibe of the site.
I don't like the editing that cuts out the build-up to the sex.
I like my models to be young and attractive, and the models at this site are basically a much less attractive group of women than the Jays POV models.
The plots at Jays POV site can be repetitious, but the models are yummy, and the sets and lighting are clean.
The sets at Filthy POV are cheap, the models are presented at sluts, the lighting is dim.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Site is part of the Dirty Flix network.
If you join through the She Is Nerdy site, you will pay $30/month, or $120/year.
But if you join through the Dirty Flix site directly, you can normally find discounted prices of $15/month or $60/year. I joined through Dirty Flix for $60/year. Joining through She Is Nerdy and/or Dirty Flix gives you access to the same sites.
-The videos have your choice for downloading of low, medium and high definition. And since November 2016 they added 4K definition for downloading.
But for online streaming, they stream at 240p, 720p, or 1080p. There is no 4K option for streaming, even on the newest videos.
-There is an accompanying screen shot set for each video. The zip file comes in only one definition. The screen shot sets vary between 40 to about 80 screen shots. These are screen shots, not photos.
-No pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. Unusual. I looked all over for a pre-checked cross-sale, but finally realized there wasn't any.
Cons:
-On the public page, it tells you you have 5 video previews, to see what the quality of a video looks like. Except, when you click on a video preview link, instead of watching a video preview, it brings up the join page, where the prices shown are expensive: $30/month, or $120/year.
Two cons:
the prices shown are expensive.
instead of viewing a sample preview, you get the join page. Where's the sample preview? You have to join the site to see the video. Ha-ha. Joke is on you.
-The login and member pages are non-secure. Your browser will probably have a popup notice stating "This conection is not secure. Logins entered here could be compromised."
-There are no video previews in the members area. If you want to know what the video is about, you can look at the thumbnail screen shots, or you can read the generic text description which tells you a model will get fucked by a stunt cock.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
There is minimal plot to most of these videos: You have a cute girl who starts off wearing glasses (which is supposed to show she is a nerdy girl), you've got a young stunt cock who's got sex on his brain (these are Russians, remember), they touch, they kiss, then it's off to teen hardcore heaven.
-Irregular update rate. From 2 to 4 new videos per month. But if you count the accompanying screenshot sets, that means 4 to 8 new items per month.
-Verotel is the default payment processor that I used. Not as widely known as CCBill or Epoch, but a trusted name in high-risk payment processing (the classification for porn pay sites).
-There are ads on every member page, but that's standard to most porn sites.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
Movies: 121
Photosets: 121
Models: around 121
Site launched in 2014
Videos run about 20 to 30 minutes
The photosets are screenshot sets, not photosets, since the contents of a set are screen shots. Screen shots are lower quality than photos. The definition is usually less. The focus is not as good, the composition of the image is normally less artistic.
Site theme: nerdy girls having sex.
What makes a girl nerdy? She is wearing glasses. That's all it takes. And sometimes the girls aren't even wearing glasses. You have to take the site's idea that any girl can be nerdy. And most of the girls at the site are cute teens (or early twenties) who are wet inside and ready to milk your cock with their mouth and pussy and even their ass.
Let me emphasize how cute and hot these teens are.
You would think the sex would get repetitous and boring very fast. But if you're into attractive teen girls like I am, the videos are more than watchable, they can be arousing.
The site (and most of the network) does a fine job selecting cute teen models who put on a show for you.
These girls are almost all featured at competing teen hardcore sites, like Nubiles.net, Nubiles Porn, Team Skeet, Teen Mega World, Twistys, etc. Some of them can even appear at MetArt.
The plot or setup to the sex is usually minimal. The screenshot sets are usually not worth collecting, even if the models are attractive, because the quality of the screenshot is not good or just OK. But the videos are definitely worth collecting. The models are cute, the images are clear and crisp, the video does a fine to excellent job capturing how attractive these young girls are. The models don't wear a lot of makeup, the sets are not expensive but not overly cheap, the video is like a slice of life of what you'd like to see (and do) if you were a teen or early twenties person again with one of these lovely young women. This isn't glamcore or heartcore, but it's a closer to slice of life of what you wish you had been exposed to as a young man.
Although many of the model and stunt cocks are Russian or from that region, there are some from America. So some videos do have English dialogue. But dialogue, or its lack, is a minor element in the videos. Although I enjoy plot-driven porn, especially when it's done well, any plot is a minor factor in these videos. You've got a nubile girl and a guy that wants to get his rocks off. It's not rough, crude, or over the top sex. Instead, it's two young people enjoying each other without guilt or any other baggage. Occasionally there is a touch of romance, if you want to consider kissing and holding hands romance before the hardcore sex. But the site focuses on the hardcore sex.
The site and network has a simple structure that is easy to navigate. There is a search engine, if you want to check the video for a title you've seen. There are hot links for all the model's content at the network, once you click on her name. The models themselves, as I've stated, are young white teen- or early-twenties- girls who are mainly attractive. Little effort is put into presenting them attractively, but they are naturally young and attractive to begin with: they don't need much make-up, expensive sets, glamourous costumes, or extensive lighting.
I'm giving the site a score of 90. The site focuses on teen girls who are into sex. The videos are mainly bread-and-butter hardcore sex, but I enjoy them.
If hardcore teen sex is not your niche, you would score the site lower, and would probably be bored with it. I regard the simple plots, or lack of them, as a positive, because most porn starlets are poor actors. There's no problem with a stupid plot, because there's almost no plot in these videos. You have a girl and a guy, they meet or are together, and they have sex.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The models are attractive teens. Site (and 18Videoz network) does a great job finding cute young teens. Some girls might be in their early twenties, but these girls look young (but still legal).
-There is a text description of the video that is brief but covers the minor plot. There's almost no plot. You have a guy, a girl, and they've got sex on the brain. You have to admire these Russians, they don't waste a lot of time on non-essentials before getting to the sex.
-The tags also do a fine job tagging the action.
-Navigation is simple and easy. The site structure is basic: not a lot of bells and whistles, but that's good, because the site focuses on giving you a lot of hot teen sex.
-You are allowed to comment on the videos. And the comments can be worth reading. They show that the members really appreciate how attractive these models are, how hot the sex can be. The sex is straight-forward, not over-the-top acrobatics, almost no seduction or build-up, but these models are cute.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
And you don't need a plot or seduction to enjoy watching these teens expose their bodies and get it on.
I don't know why it doesn't get boring. At many competing sites, the sex can get boring because of stupid plots and poor acting. Here, you focus on these teen models, their fine bodies, and it's fucking erotic.
-A very long time before you are logged out for site inactivity.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Unlimited downloads.
-All videos are available in low, medium and high definition. 4K definition was introduced in late 2016.
CONS(START OF):
-This is strange. The login can be secure or non-secure. Once you get to the members area, the members pages can be secure or non-secure. I've never seen a network where this happens. Normally you have secure login and member pages, or login and members pages are non-secure. But not at this network.
-The photosets are disappointing. They are low quality screen shots not worth collecting.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-There is a zip file for the photosets. But it's in only one definition.
-The default file name of the downloaded screenshot zip file is the title of the video. So if you do want to collect these photosets, you have to manually add the model's name, date posted, and site.
-When I open a photo from the photoset, and try to manually go through the photos, the photos don't show in order: instead, the photos appear in a random manner. The photos in a set are numbered 1 through XX (up to 100), but they display in a random order, or they don't play in a slide show properly. I check to see that I haven't selected "random order", and the program is set for a normal slideshow. But the screen shots do not display in normal order.
I test to see if my program is working, with a photoset from Metart or Domai, and those sets display normally. But not the sets from Teeny Lovers. The problem seems to be the decoding embedded in the screen cap files.
-Another odd thing about the screen cap files: I open a screen cap file, it's a jpg file. It shows the method is deflated. But the computer does not show/allow the dimensions of the file, which most photosets do allow. The computer shows the file is 649 KB, which is a large size for a jpg file. But no dimensions/definition are shown.
Not only do the screen shot files take a lot of storage space, but they hide the security and details that are shown on most photoset files.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Number of videos: 502.
Videos are available in your choice of definition of low, medium, high, higher, and UHD.
UHD was made available starting in late 2016.
Photosets (really screen shot sets): 50 to 100 screen shots per set.
Number of photosets: 502 (one photoset for each video).
Number of updates per month: 3 or 4 videos(with accompanying photoset).
Teeny Lovers is a good-sized site: 502 videos.
You also get access to about 17 other sites in the network.
The site (and network) is teen orientated.
The main strength of the site (and network) is how cute most of these teens are. If you are into teens, you've seen these teens at such sites as Teen Mega World, Wow sites, Team Skeet, etc. There are also a few that have been featured at the Metart network.
The simple navigation is also a plus factor for the site and network.
The site is easy to navigate.
You can switch between sites in the network, without having to re-login.
The content for each model is brought at the network is brought up when you click on the model's name.
There is a model's page, that gives you a nice thumbnail of the model and a brief listing of her physical attributes, including her date of birth.
If you want to join, join through the 18Videoz site:
There are discounts for joining the 18Videoz site that should be easy to find: I paid $60/year.
There is also a $15/month option.
Both of these choices include full streaming and unlimited downloads.
If you join through the Teeny Lovers site, or one of the other sites in the network, you will probably pay a much higher price, maybe even double.
Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to the entire network.
There are no premium sites that require extra payment.
I definitely think Teeny Lovers (and the 18 Videoz network) are worthwhile joins.
Mainly because of the very attractive teen models.
The site/network is easy to use.
If you are into hardcore teen, this site is worth joining.
The plots are simple, they don't put much effort into making the models attractive. But these are young teens who are naturally attractive, they were selected because they are attractive, and willing and able to display their charms on video. It's bread-and-butter sex, not glamour or sensual, but can be hot. And the models are yummy.
I've been a member of the network for at least the last couple of years.
Technically, I think the 3 sites are supposed to be separate sites.
The URL for each site is still different.
But on a practical basis, the content for the 3 sites is the same.
The same videos and photo sets for all 3 sites.
And you can join any one of the 3 sites directly, but you will gain access to all 3 sites (plus the Ultra Films site).
Technically, I was told in an email that I only have a membership in only one of the sites, even though I have access to all 4 sites.
I don't know if that is a legal distinction, a technical distinction, or how you label it.
On a practical basis, it doesn't seem to make a difference.
Except it would be simpler, more understandable, if they said I was a member of all 4 sites.
But they definitely told me I'm only a member of one of the 4 sites, even though I have full access to all 4 sites.
So when PU admin says all 3 sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) have been merged into All Fine Girls, that is the opinion of PU admin, not the opinion of the sites themselves.
They are still marketed as 4 separate sites, even though joining any one of them gives you total access to all 4 sites. Even if the content of 3 of the sites is the same.
This is a long-winded explanation of something I don't really understand.
LOL
But the girls are lovely.
I've been a member of the network for at least the last couple of years.
Technically, I think the 3 sites are supposed to be separate sites.
The URL for each site is still different.
But on a practical basis, the content for the 3 sites is the same.
The same videos and photo sets for all 3 sites.
And you can join any one of the 3 sites directly, but you will gain access to all 3 sites (plus the Ultra Films sites).
Technically, I was told in an email that I only have a membership in only one of the sites, even though I have access to all 4 sites.
I don't know if that is a legal distinction, a technical distinction, or how you label it.
On a practical basis, it doesn't seem to make a difference.
Except it would be simpler, more understandable, if they said I was a member of all 4 sites.
But they definitely told me I'm only a member of one of the 4 sites, even though I have full access to all 4 sites.
So when PU admin says all 3 sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) have been merged into All Fine Girls, that is the opinion of PU admin, not the opinion of the sites themselves.
They are still marketed as 4 separate sites, even though joining any one of them gives you total access to all 4 sites. Even if the content of 3 of the sites is the same.
This is a long-winded explanation of something I don't really understand.
LOL
But the girls are lovely.
Congrats on winning first place in today's raffle.
The gods must be smiling down on you.
Maybe you can find some bargains on Amazon prime day, which will be June 21-22.
Best wishes.
A nice summary of the site: "This is more like the porn sites we used to join to enjoy the hunt. That's what you're going to be doing here."
That leaves me out. I don't have the patience I once did, to hunt for good content. I want it easily available, without a lot of filler material I have to slog through.
I've complained about the Adult Time network navigation problems in the past.
Some people praise how easy it is to navigate the network.
They must have some secret I haven't learned yet.
But navigation is probably the main reason I don't use Adult Time as much as I would like to.
I really like your cons. Think they're important, at least for me:
-Slow update rate.
-Poor search capability.
-Too many breast-implant models.
-Porn-valley look (great phrase to describe models' looks).
Different people can have wildly differing opinions of the same site.
The same with a movie: a critic can say a movie is wonderful, a different critic can say the same movie is disappointing.
That's why I used to try to find a critic that I could try to depend on, because his/her reviews of movies were in alignment with my opinions of movies.
Some PU members scored Wicked Pictures very high. Other PU members thought the site was poor. Other PU members thought the site was good, but not great.
Different strokes for different folks.
Do you believe a site has an intrinsic value that shines through the same for everyone?
I think you're being harsh when you question the value of The Best Porn site.
It's a good source of information about porn sites.
Some information might be wrong, and the score is only a guide.
I find the PU reviews to be more useful, to get a feel for what a site offers.
But that's just me.
But before I join a site, I usually like to read TPB and PU reviews, to see if a site is worth my money.
Tom D,
Thanks for the explanation on the site update.
Several times, when I tried to post a response to a message, I was logged out, instead of posting a message.
No big deal. I just had to re-login, and then try to post a message again.
But the site software seems to be sensitive to any maintenance updates.
LOL.
Thanks for the fast response to my comment.
And for the helpful hint about a discount.
I've looked for a discount to X-Art many times, and never found any.
But using your tip, I found a nice discount.
I might join X-Art for a month, when I have more time.
Thanks again.
The PU site is messed up today.
The site was un-available for a few hours this morning.
And when I posted a reply to your message, it was posted with the alias of Tom D (the PU site staff), instead of being posted under my alias.
Really strange.
Was the PU site hacked, or under some kind of cyber attack?
X-Art membership seems very expensive.
Also, they bundle a membership to X-Art with a membership in SuperHot.
So it's $100 for 6 months to X-Art and SuperHot.
Or $150 for the first year's membership.
Or $200 for 2 years membership.
Years ago, you could have a membership in X-Art, without the SuperHot membership.
Actually, years ago, there was no SuperHot.
What membership did you have?
Combined membership to X-Art and SuperHot?
Or a membership in X-Art by itself?
If you were a member of SuperHot, did you like the site, think it was a worthwhile join?
Or a waste of money?
Also, what did you pay for an X-Art membership?
Were you able to get a nice discount?
They used to have an occasional sale, but I haven't seen a discount to X-Art in years.
For $100 for 6 months, I'd rather spend my money elsewhere. X-Art was one of my favorite glamcore sites, but that was years ago, when the price was much less.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Exclusive content.
-This is an excellent glamour network with lots of lovely models. The selection of models ranges from merely attractive to fucking gorgeous. The star of the network is The White Boxxx, where they made an art form of taking attractive girls and presenting them as lovely as any movie star at her premiere. They use expensive sets, erotic lingerie, wonderful lighting, and smooth, professional videos that emphasize how lovely these models are.
-The background music at The White Boxxx is usually soft. Background music at other sites in the network can be loud, jarring. Meant to add some excitement to the video, but I find loud music to be distracting, and need to turn the volume down to make it less annoying.
-Runtime is around 20 - 30 minutes for a video.
-Some of the featured models include:
Agatha Vega, Anna ReyAriela Donovan, Arya Fae, Freya Mayer, Jessica Spielberg, Julia Red, Kenna James, Lena Reif, Lika Star, Liya Silver, Lola Myluv, Lovita Fate, Lucy Li.
Cons:
-Flash page of ads before you get into the members area.
Even after you hit the link, "Continue to members area", what opens, instead of a members area page, is another ad. Do these people understand English, or are they so focused on selling they think you're going to going to sign up for a site instead of wanting to view content you already paid for?
-Of course, there are also ads on every member page. What a suprise.
-Some of the ads are "Limited time offer". And there is a clock ticking down the time the offer is still valid. I don't have enough excitement in my life. This adds to the thrill, watching the ad before it expires. (Sarcasm). However, the ad starts with 19 hours 59 minutes. So I have plenty of time to think over the offer before it expires. However, I already have a membership in Nubiles Porn, so the ad is wasted on me.
-They've reduced the time limit that logs you out of the network. Minor annoyance, since it's easy to log back in,
Bottom Line:
CONS CONTINUED:
and you get to see the flash page of ads again, before you can navigate to the members area.
-It gets boring watching the same intro section of each video that showcases the network, time after time, so there's a link that lets you skip the intro.
-The sex can be slow and sensual at the start, because they are trying to create erotic content, a visual feast. But the girls are so lovely, scenes can lack heat. Some scenes at Devils Film, Rocco Siffredi, Teen Fidelity just have greater impact. But for pure visual splendor of the models, the settings, The White Boxxx is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet.
-There is a monthly limit of 100 video downloads for the network.
-A personal issue: a lot of the lovely models have tattoos. Some of the models have large tattoos that cover a lot of their body. I'm not a fan of tattoos. Think they distract from the model's beauty.
-Photo sets are tiny. Around 6 to 10 photos per set. The photos are from the accompanying video. These lovely models deserve more photos in a set. The photo sets are basically a wasted opportunity of these girls.
-All videos are offered in 240p through 1080p. Which is suprising for a glamcore network. Competing sites started offering 4K definition in 2015 or 2016.
-Network update rate is slow, about 10 to 14 new videos per month.
-Navigation can be clunky. You hit the back button, and you can be logged out of the site. Or you're still in the site, but you've lost your place in the site listing (you have to use clicks to get back the page you were viewing).
-Most sites don't update.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
BOTTOM LINE:
Lets Doe It network has 17 sites:
The different sites are meant to offer different porn themes:
The White Boxxx-333 scenes, the star of the network, is pure glamcore porn, one of the finest glamcore sites on the internet. Lovely models, videotaped in lush sets, excellent lighting that highlights the beauty of the models, expensive costumes.
A girl knows-200 scenes, a glamcore lesbian site.
Her Limit-151 scenes, a hardcore site featuring aggressive sex that pushes the models to the limit.
Horny Hostel-54 scenes, sex in a hostel.
Xchimera-35 scenes, fantasy sex that is supposed to be taboo. There were 35 scenes in Jan 2020. Then they supposedly updated the site in 2020 with 7 more scenes, but the count remained at 35. My guess is they did not update the site, just changed the posting date of 7 scenes to 2020. Which seems deceptive.
Scam Angels-50 scenes. Girls have sex with rich guys, then blackmail them.
Bitches Abroad-100 scenes. Girls travelling to different countries have sex with local studs.
Porno Acadamie-36 scenes. High school girls have sex in France.
Bums Bus-134 scenes. German girls have sex with guys who drive a van. An acquired taste. The van drivers are jerks who think they are really cool.
XXX Shades-124 scenes. Sex that is supposed to be erotic, based on the Fifty Shades of Grey movies.
Doe Projects-36 scenes. Pilots for possible series.
Relaxxxed-130 scenes. Massage videos.
Kinky In-Laws-30 scenes. Faux incest with step-families.
My Naughty Album-70 scenes. Sex between a model and her photographer in a photoshoot.
Bums Buero-53 scenes. Office sex.
Quest for Orgasm-80 scenes. Girl solo masturbation.
Bums Besuch-27 scenes. German fans get to have sex with porn stars.
Most of the sites are archive sites, that haven't updated in years.
The network update rate is low: maybe 10+ videos in a month.
There are lots of really attractive models featured at the sites. And the videos, for the most part, are crystal clear images. The best sites are The White Boxxx, a great glamcore site. A Girl Knows, a glamcore lesbian site. Her Limit, extreme sex site, Horny Hostel, sex in a hostel, Bitches Abroad, where girls travelling to a foreign country hook up with a local stud, XXX Shades, where there's an element of BDSM, all have some worthwhile videos to watch. Mainly because the girls are so attractive.
Because of the slow update rate, because most sites are not updating, the 100 video download limit per month, I'm giving the network a score of 85.
If they increase the update rate, once the covid infection has passed, remove the 100 video/month download limit, improve the navigation, increase the time before you're logged out, decrease the amount of ads, the score would improve.
All these negatives mean the score is in the 80's range, where it used to be in the 90's.
They are making the network harder to use, for no reason that I can tell.
It's been a while since I was a member of Team Skeet.
But my best guess is that $60/year is a streaming only membership.
Downloads will almost certainly cost more, per month.
PU member Wraith0711 is the expert on this network, since he's joined them fairly recently. So if he responds, he can probably tell you what's what.
Or, you can email Team Skeet customer service with your questions, for another expert's reply.
The link I got opens a page (the URL above) that seems to offer your choice of joining all 6 sites, or any sites of your choosing, for a discounted price.
Hope this helps, if you want to join.
I've got too many subs already, to want to join these choices.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They've increased the thumbnail sizes on the public preview page, and made the thumbnails brighter, so the models, which are mostly cute teens to begin with, look more attractive.
-Dirty Flix is a network with 15 sites. You get access to all the sites, there are no sites you have to pay extra for.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-You can view the photo sets in an online slideshow, or download a zip file of the photo set.
-The network has hundreds of cute teens.
Cons:
-Regular membership is expensive. The listed price is $30/month, or $120/year. But you can find discounts that allow you to join for $15/month, or $60/year. I paid $60/year.
-Login is not secure. You get a popup warning you, when you enter your login details, "This conection is not secure. Logins entered here could be compromised."
Which is poor. The only way to get into the members area is through a non-secure gateway.
Note: sometimes you click on the login link, and you are directly entered into the non-secure members area, without having to enter your login details (with cookies enabled). But I would assume that is still open to hacking.
-A lot of videos/photo sets that are posted here are also posted at Videoz network, which is run by the same people. So it increases the update rate at both networks, using the same content.
-The login details (username and password) are computer generated. So have to write them down, you can't remember a nonsense string.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-The photo sets only have one definition for the zip file. But because of the poor quality of the screen caps, even if the model is cute, I don't think the sets are worth collecting.
These are screen caps. The lighting varies wildly, from poor to good. The quality of the sets also varies wildly: the sets are an improvement from years ago, but can be cheap to nice.
-The photo set zip file downloads with the title of the video. But you have to manually add the model's name, the date posted, the name of the site.
-Ads on every member page.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Network stats:
Movies: 1390.
Models: 727.
Photo sets: 1391.
Number of screen shots per photo set: around 50 to 80.
The photo sets are made from the accompanying video. The photo sets are screen shots. The quality of the photo sets can vary from poor to good.
The photo sets at the Wow network (a competing network) are real photos that are really excellent, much higher quality. The photo sets at Teen Mega World (a different competing network) are better quality than the Dirty Flix screen caps. The Dirty Flix network needs to invest in a good software program that will make better photos from their videos. The screen caps are better than what low-cost porn networks used to post many years ago, but compared to what competing hardcore teen sites offer, the Dirty Flix photo sets are usually lower quality.
Dirty Flix and 18Videoz are two networks offered by the same people.
The two networks are similar.
Both are hardcore teen.
The network structure is the same for both networks.
They even have the same ads for other sites at both networks.
If I had to join one network, I would choose the 18Videoz network. It has more content. 3,308 movies versus 1390. 2,249 models versus 1390. 18 sites versus 15 sites.
Both networks have a site structure that is easy to use. With a lot of attractive teen models. And a low membership price, if you find the $15/month or $60/year prices.
Both networks started off offering videos with low, medium and high definition.
Both networks upgraded their video player around May 2016.
Both network started offering 4K definition videos in November 2016.
Both sites offer a sorted video listing by newest, longest, or highest rated.
Both sites switched to a hot link of their models, where clicking on the model's name brings up her video content at the network.
I guess that Dirty Flix will soon offer a secure login, since 18Videoz now offers a secure login.
The 18Videoz network is strange: sometimes, the login is secure, sometimes it's non-secure. I'm guessing 18Videoz is switching over to secure access, and haven't finished the conversion completely. And since both networks have followed the same upgrades over the years, I assume that Dirty Flix will offer a secure login and secure member pages in the near future.
I'm giving Dirty Flix a score of 85. The 18Videoz network has more content, and more models. But both networks have the same structure that is easy to use.
marcdc1 posted a review of Rebecca's Office on 05-22-21.
That review has disappeared from the normal listing of reviews on the PU homepage.
On the tally for June 9, 2021 raffle updated may 25th, marcdc1 is shown with only 1 entry.
Is there a reason why marcdc1's review was removed from the review list?
Is there a reason why marcdc1 only has 1 entry for the raffle, instead of 5 or 6 entries that should have been given for an approved review?
Anyway, if the review by marcdc1 was accepted, it seems only fair that he should be given 5 or 6 entries for the raffle, instead of 1 entry.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Young Libertines is part of the 18 Videoz network. You get access to 18 different sites.
Note: if you join directly through Young Libertines, you pay $29.95/month, or $119.95/year.
If you join through 18Videoz, you pay (with a PU discount) $14.95/month, or $59.95/year.
Both memberships give you access to the same sites.
So do yourself a favor and join through 18Videoz.
-They have really improved the technical features of the videos. And the quality of the sets.
The clothes the models and stunt cocks wear are not expensive, but not cheap. They are regular clothes, which goes along with the upgraded videos you see at the site. The videos are now really nice. And watching a video can be very different from the older videos: it's like you're watching a video in real-life: a lovely young teen takes a shower, her hands stroke her body, slightly suggestive, but not getting into masturbation.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
She finishes the shower, puts on some clothes, a boy comes over, they kiss, and then have sex. The sex is plain vanilla; but the girl is attractive, and the sex is real, not over-the-top theatrics.
-You have a choice of streaming and downloading in low, medium or high definition. The newer videos offer a 4K definition (starting in November 2016).
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-The site is not glamour. The models don't wear a lot of make-up, the clothes are regular street clothes. But the teens are mainly fresh young teens, attractive to really lovely. The videos are
crystal clear, nicely focused, and the girls are mainly attractive to fucking yummy.
-The videos have lots of tags to describe the action. The text description is not as good, it's more generic that doesn't really tell you much.
-You click on a model's name, and links to all her video content at the network appear.
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-The thumbnails for the videos are disappointing. They are small, and on the video listing, don't give you a clear picture of the model. But on the individual video listing, the photo is very large (12" by 7" on 27" monitor) and gives you a clear picture of the model. However, the flesh tones and the photo could be improved to present the model more attractively.
-It's confusing. Sometimes member pages are secure. Sometimes they are not secure. I don't think I've ever seen a site where you see mixed pages of secure and non-secure member pages.
Let me explain: if one member page is secure, all the member pages will be secure for that login.
If a member page is not secure, all the member pages will be non-secure for that login.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-18Videoz and DirtyFlix are run by the same people. A lot of the videos (and the accompanying photo sets) are posted at both networks. This increases the update rate at both networks. But it reduces the value of having a membership at both sites.
-Most videos and photo sets have a yellowish tinge. Which is disappointing. I don't know if this is due to lighting or a filter. Natural colors would improve the videos/photo sets a lot.
-Login details are computer generated.
-The photo set are screen shots. The zip file provided only has one definition.
-Slow update rate. Used to be about 2 videos per month. But has slowed to 1 video per month.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
608 Movies. So there's a lot of content for the site.
The network has 3,308 movies.
The site has 2,249 models.
You can sort the movies by newest, top rated, runtime.
Videos normally run 20 to 30 minutes.
Photo sets have around 50 to 80 photos. These are screen shots, OK to nice quality, usually nicely focused. But these girls are attractive, they really deserve a photographic record of the shoot. The level of attractiveness of the models is one of the main strengths of the network.
The low membership price ($60/year, with a PU discount if you join through the PU link to 18Videoz), plus the high level of attractiveness of the models, plus the large amount of content (over 600 videos at the site, over 3300 at the network), make this a worthwhile join.
The plots are simple or non-existent: a girl meets a boy, they go to his apartment, start to kiss, then fuck. Or a boy comes over to the girl's apartment and they kiss and fuck. Or they start in the apartment, kissing and fucking. It doesn't get much simpler than that. No elaborate seduction. Almost no foreplay. Just a kiss or two, if that much, before the get to licking each other's crotch, or sucking and fucking.
So don't expect story-driven plots. These young teens are primed and ready to fuck. Which might get repetitious, except they are young, attractive, and filled with a sex drive that ignores taboos and guilt.
I really enjoy Pure Taboo, a competing site (part of the Adult Time network), which is probably the finest story-driven site with dark sex (sex with guilt). But Young Libertines (and other sites in that network) is a nice change from Pure Taboo, filled with attractive teen girls who enjoy fucking.
Pure Taboo is higher quality in production values, and gives you a cinematic experience.
But a lower membership price makes Young Libertines an attractive alternative.
I enjoy watching attractive young teens displaying their charms.
And some of the models at the Young Libertines site and network are fucking attractive.
Note: forget the site title: Young Libertines. These are young girls that want to have fun. They are not flouting moral rules, which is what the old-time libertines were supposed to do. Flouting the rules was part of the thrill. The Young Libertine site shows girls that are into sex as a way to have fun.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
