Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Adult Time network. Which means you get a massive amount of quality porn with your membership.
-Customer support from FameSupport, which has a live chat line that is answered almost immediately. Support is 24/7, for live chat, email and telephone. Probably the best online support I've ever had, because of the live chat option.
-Videos are available for download and streaming from 160p thru 2160p.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads. There is a daily download limit of 300 GB, which seems like a huge amount of data to download.
-There is a photo set gallery for each video. The photo sets run around 35 photos per set, which seems small.
-Lola Fae, Chloe Foster, Jill Kassidy, Sophia Lux, Bunny Colby, Scarlett Sage, are just a few of the attractive models appearing at the site.
Cons:
-As part of the Adult Time network, you also get navigation problems: finding all the content at this site, or at other sites in the Adult Time network, can be a real headache.
-The photo sets download with a default numerical file name. So you have to rename them with the model's name, site, title, and posting date.
-The photo sets are OK photos: could be much better quality, especially when the models are cute. They are better than some screen caps, but you wouldn't collect them for presenting the models attractively, even when the models are naturally attractive.
-The videos often have a plot leading up to the sex. But that just shows how poor some of the models are in acting. However, I forgive them for poor acting ability, especially when the models are cute.
Bottom Line:
There are plenty of lesbian sites online.
I think Girlfriends Films is a good lesbian site. Not great, but good.
You have some very attractive young models.
You have a mix of young and old lesbians, with different body types.
They add a plot to create greater meaning for the sex, but the plots don't mean much.
Add weak plots with weaker acting skills, and like most porn, you have to turn off your brain to enjoy these videos. There are some sites that have interesting story lines, and the models and stunt cocks do a decent to good acting job, but these are in the minority. Pure Taboo comes to mind, and Viv Thomas has some very fine scenes. But Pure Taboo and Viv Thomas are premium porn sites, watching their videos is like watching a cinematic movie.
Giving GirlFriends Films a score of 85. If you're into lesbian porn, the Adult Time network has several channels that fit the bill, plus other channels that have some lesbian porn.
If Tom D (PU staff) sees this comment,he should be able to help.
PU staff have greater weight than a regular site member, so sites are more willing to work with them to fix any issues.
I am a member of several Metart sites, so if I click on the link of a model's content at a Metart site I am a member of, it opens a page at that site with the model's video or photoset displayed. Which is a convenient feature, since I don't have to open a new page manually, go to the paysite, login, and then search for that particular video or photoset to bring it up.
The Metart team is really trying to make their network user friendly.
-This is a personal issue: I transferred from Spectrum to T-Mobile home internet this month. I was paying $80/month for Spectrum internet access, but was getting a 400 Mbps connection. Using WiFi off that connection dropped the speeds down to 100 to 170 Mbps.
T-Mobile Home Internet is cheaper. $50/month. With T-Mobile, you're running off the WiFi connection, which varies wildly. I can get anywhere from 2 Mbps to 90 Mbps, without moving my device or the T-Mobile Gateway. There can be problems with the slower, T-Mobile connection. Browser pages won't load sometimes, videos buffer and stop playing.
If I had known the drop in service from Spectrum to T-Mobile, I would have remained with Spectrum, even at the higher price.
-With a faster connection, I wouldn't have as many problems with navigation at Adult Time and other sites.
However, I only switched internet providers this month. So I've had well over 2 years of Adult Time at the faster 100-170 Mbps wifi connection, and the Adult Time navigation is clunky even with a faster connection: because the links are slow to respond, or fail to respond.
I'm giving Sexart.com a score of 90. It's an excellent addition to the MetArt network, which is one the premier networks of glam-style porn.
I'm giving the Sexart channel of Adult Time a score of 88. The main defect is the poor navigation.
The Sexart channel is a fine addition to the Adult Time network, but instead of constantly adding new content, the site operators should focus on making the content already posted more easily found.
Not sure why you have stopped leaving reviews.
Your reviews were worthwhile because they gave your own thoughts on sites, which could be useful or informative.
As a bonus, your reviews could earn you tickets for the monthly raffle.
A review takes more time to write than a comment, but you might want to re-think your position about writing reviews.
Just my opinion, of course. You're the one who decides about writing reviews.
Whether it's worth the time and effort.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bounty Hunter Porn is part of the Nubiles Porn network, which has about 17 different sites.
Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the sites. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra to access.
-Nubiles Porn currently has a special sale:
30 day membership: $12.95 for the first month, recurring at $14.95/month.
365 day membership: $84.00/year.
-Multiple funding choices: credit card, paypal, checking account, eu direct debit, other.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Unlimited downloading and fast streaming.
-Hardcore erotic videos.
-Top-quality production values. This is not a glamcore site or network, but the sets are clean, the videos and photosets are professionally shot, with good lighting, good sound control, good focus, etc.
-Network has weekly updates.
-Navigation is simple. Can easily switch to other sites using a hot link.
Cons:
-Cons are basically minor.
-The main con is this is a tiny, archive site. Only 5 videos plus matching photosets. Last update was Sep 19, 2016.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-First page you see on logging in is an ad page: a page filled with ads for other sites, with no content from the network.
-There are ads for other sites on every member page. Very common for porn sites.
Bottom Line:
This site caters to PU members who fantasize about strapping a short-barreled Winchester to their leg, in homage to Steve McQueen, who starred in the TV series "Wanted: Dead or Alive".
I always wanted to enforce the law by tracking down evil but lovely young teens who broke the law.
No matter how much they might scream and plead, I would fuck them till their brains would explode, because that's what cops do: enforce the law on evil doers everywhere.
With such a strong premise, it's disappointing this is a tiny site.
The site has 5 videos. With matching photosets.
The technical features of the videos and photosets are good. The site was started around 2016, and the videos have a streaming and download choices of 270p through 1080p.
Why do I wish the site was larger, and still updating?
For several reasons:
-The plot/theme of a bounty stud hunting down and fucking a bad teen girl is simple and easily filmed.
It requires almost no acting ability, which is great, because most porn models are terrible actors.
The plots at many porn sites are stupid, and filled with bad dialogue. This site theme (a bounty guy hunting down a girl) should be easy to film, with simple dialogue that is less cringe-worthy than the average porn video. Only simple acting skills are required to show a guy grabbing a girl and then having sex with her, which is better justification than the un-realistic plots of many porn videos.
The selection of models at the site is good: these models are young, cute, nubile, and fit the template of the Nubiles Porn network.
Naomi Woods, Alexa Grace, Piper Perri, Alexa Nova, and Kirsten Lee are the models: what hot-blooded American male looking at these models wouldn't fantasize about grabbing these girls and forcing them to have sex, especially since you are supposed to have the force of the law backing you up when you grab these girls?
The law teaches you that cops support other cops, in the performance of their duty.
So if the criminal cute girl wants to pay you off with a little nookie, what cop would say no?
Also, the faces of the bounty hunter studs are blurred in the videos.
This is to protect the identity of the studs.
How could these videos be improved?
The main improvement would be to resume updates. Which won't happen, since the last update was over 5 years ago.
Minor improvements would be to give the bounty hunter studs flashier vehicles. A Maserati or Ferrari would be my choice of vehicle to chase these girls. The bounty hunter stud drives a van, which is a let down. Give him a upscale car like the cars the Miami Vice cops drive.
A screaming siren would be nice, with flashing lights. I want any vehicles on the road to pull off the road and stop, to show how important I am when I go zooming down the road.
Porn is fantasy, and my fantasy is to show the world that I am the greatest, most important PU user on the road.
The producers of this site were wrong to stop updating this site. The site theme is more believable than many of the network sites that are currently updating.
I'm giving the site a score of 80, because the site models are cute girls, the site theme is easily filmed, and navigation is simple and easy, for checking the site contents, for switching to other sites in the network using a hot link.
I also use IDM and it can cause problems.
On some sites, when I click on a link to see a pdf file or new page, instead of allowing the pdf to appear or the new page to appear, it tries to download the file.
I don't want to download the file, but to view it online.
But I have no choice: so I download the file, then have to search where the file is on my PC.
IDM can be useful.
It can also be a pain.
LOL.
How do you disable IDM?
The only sign I see of IDM is a tiny strip that says "Download This Video" sometimes.
I don't control that strip. It appears randomly, I think.
Would like to control when it appears.
Would also like to be able to disable the program, when I want.
Are you able to control the IDM program very well?
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Content is exclusive.
-The site (and network) is laid out to make navigation simple. You can easily find the video content of the site
-No site timeout that I can find. You can leave the site inactive for hours, and will still be logged in. Perfect for guys who forget what they are logged into (Joke. PU members are self-aware, and watch their porn closely.)
-In the last year, they added secure login to the site/network. In the last month, they made the member pages secure (https).
-The videos were shot in the US, so the models speak English. Which helps to show how these macho studs enjoy humiliating these girls.
Cons:
-Do not join the site through the site itself. You will be paying a high price.
$29.95/month, or $50 for 3 months.
Join through the 18Videoz site, where the fee is $60/year. Or $15/month.
The 18Videoz membership includes The Girls Next Door Abused site, plus access to 17 more sites.
-The main con is this is an archive site. The site stopped updating in 2012 or earlier.
A PU member in 2008 reported that the site had stopped updating, but was changing the content posting dates to give the impression that content was newly added.
-Ads on every page.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-They need to do an update of the public page advertising the site.
The photos/thumbnails are washed out images, with poor colors, images that are not clear and crisp.
The public page is the first thing a person sees when looking at the site.
They need to sell the site, not show an old tired page that has been out of date for many years.
Bottom Line:
Because this is an archive site, with old content, the videos and screenshots are low quality. The photography is poor, the lighting is poor, the colors are poor, the sets are cheap, the definition is low compared to what most porn sites offer.
The only value this site offers is a reminder of the early days of porn. And what producers could get away with.
The site theme is treating girls like trash: get your rocks off with these girls, lie to them, humiliate them, and show them what a macho stud you are before pushing them out the door.
Site contents: 48 videos.
Runtime is 20 to 33 minutes.
There is a montage of screenshots for each video, but no way to view the individual screenshots online, or to download the screenshot set. The hot link for online viewing of the screenshots has disappeared, and the hot link for downloading a zip file for the screenshots has disappeared. And tech support pays no attention to such minor defects.
I'm giving the site a score of 65. Most of the archive sites in this network stopped updating 5 or more years ago, and the quality of the videos is poor: low definition, cheap sets, poor lighting, low technical production values, etc. There are some sites in the network that are still updating, and the videos at those sites are much higher quality. Also, there are a number of cute models at these other sites.
This is a personal opinion, but I don't enjoy watching videos of macho studs fucking young girls and then humiliating them for being stupid enough to have sex with them. It doesn't make me feel smarter or more macho.
I just used the Porn Users link to the site.
The price I see for joining is $19.95 for 30 days.
I suggest you follow Tom D's suggestion and clear your cookies, and try again. Use the PU link to the site.
I didn't join the site, just checked what the membership price was.
Sorry.
I didn't mean to offend or say anything negative about other PU members.
The point I was trying to make is that other PU members have a different opinion on this site.
But I will try to avoid mentioning any other PU members in the future.
I thought I was being complimentary when I used your name and pinkerton, but evidently my intention was not make clear.
Again, I apologize for any misunderstanding.
Also, I have mentioned Teen Mega World many times in the past, usually with a compliment. I've been a member of that network many times. Not currently a member now. The same with the Wow sites, except I am currently a member.
I don't consider myself a shill, even though I do express high opinions about Teen Mega World and the Wow sites.
I'm not being paid for those opinions. My only connection with those sites was as a member, not an employee or shill.
But I do understand that my opinions can cause friction in other PU members.
Again, that is not my intention.
Sorry for any misunderstandings.
I meant no offense.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Joining any site in the small network gives you access to 5 sites.
The 5 sites are listed in the Bottom Line section of this review.
-Navigation is basically simple.
-There is a text file that describes the action of the video very well.
-Also, plenty of tags to describe the action of the video. So search is easy and can be very detailed, if you want it to.
-Newer videos have a definition of 320p through 4K. The 4K video file size is around 3.35 GB for a 23 minute runtime video, so the coding seems efficient.
-The content is exclusive.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
Cons:
-The level of attractiveness of the models is poor. Other PU members have written that they find the models to be attractive. I disagree completely. I respect the opinion of these PU members, but find it hard to agree with their opinion.
-I find the quality of the videos and photo sets to be poor. The images are not crystal clear, but either slightly unfocused or with a slight haze to the image. But since the models are not attractive to begin with, I wouldn't mind watching the video with the images in complete darkness, so I wouldn't have to view the models at all. (That is a joke, but also has an element of truth. These models are far below the attractive level of the Teen Mega World models, and comparing the models at Wet and Puffy to the models at the Wow sites is like comparing night and day: the Wow site models are fucking georgeous; the Wet and Puffy models are unappetizing.
-The online mechanism for viewing photo sets is clunky. Slow to load images.
-Pre-checked cross-sale.
Bottom Line:
The 5 sites of this network include:
Wet and Puffy We Like To Suck
Wet and Pissy
Simply Anal
Eurobabe Facials
There is also a live cam show at the network.
Membership in any one site gives you access to all 5 sites.
The stats for Wet and Puffy network:
Over 27000 photos. and
Over 480 models.
They advertise that the photos are the best ultra high definition picture sets.
They advertise that the tags, filters and layout of each page makes browsing simple.
The thumbnails that illustrate the models have washed out colors.
Even models that appear young and attractive at competing sites look plain and unattractive at this site, in the photo sets and videos.
You examine a photo in a photo set, and it appears as if the photo was taken with a filter that makes the model appear slightly out of focus.
Each photo set has 2 definition zip files, low and high.
The low definition is 666 x 1000 pixels.
The high definition is 2267 x 3400 pixels.
In the photos, the models are uniformly unattractive. They are plain-looking women. You go to a local mall, you find plenty of good-looking teens or twenty-year-olds. The models at this site are mainly in their twenties or thirties, and they are far less attractive than the normal twenty-thirty-year-old you find at your local mall. One reason is the photos have washed-out colors, so the skin tones of the models are not pleasing. A second reason is the models themselves are below-average in level of physical looks. Plus many of the models have lots of tattoos, which I'm not a fan of.
Even though the site advertises "best ultra high definition picture sets", I look at sets and feel the quality is far below the quality of any photo site, in any technical feature you can think of: these photo sets are shit. Teen Mega World, which is a hardcore teen site, has photo sets that are far superior in technical quality to the photo sets at Wet and Puffy. The the quality of the teen models at Teen Mega World is far superior in attractiveness to the Wet and Puffy models.
The Wet and Puffy models are mainly plain to unattractive. The photos are not worth collecting. They aren't even worth viewing.
Note: some of the live cam girls are really attractive.
Note: my opinion seems to be in the minority.
There are some attractive models at this site, but they are not presented attractively at the site. Delphine and Nika O, two girls who normally look very attractive at other sites, look washed out (in color and skin tones) and blah at this site. How a girl is photographed can make a huge difference in her appearance. Besides which, most of the models at this site are not that attractive to begin with.
Maybe I should have my eyes checked. I look for attractive girls at this site and can't find any. Some of the girls are attractive at other sites, but not at this site. I know that beauty is supposed to be in the eye of the beholder. The average female at any local mall, or even your local grocery store or Walmart, is far more attractive than the models at Wet and Puffy.
Maybe my problem is expectations: I assume that most models are chosen for their looks. But at this site, I think they were chosen for performing hardcore sex. Without bothering to filter for attractiveness.
The photo play mechanism for viewing photos online is clunky. Images are slow to load. The images themselves are poor in color, poor in clarity. You aren't viewing sharply defined images of the model.
The composition of the photo is poor. The sets are inexpensive or cheap and lacking in any imagination.
Overall, the photo sets are a waste of storage space, and not worth viewing.
I was a member of this site before, and wrote a review that highlighted how poor the site was, in terms of the attractiveness of the models, the poor quality of the photo sets. But my memory is poor, and I forgot how unappealing the site was. Which is the reason I rejoined. I was stupid.
Other PU members seem to appreciate the site much more than I do. They cite the attractive models at the site, the ease of navigation, the low membership price. I agree the membership price can be low: PU has the first month's membership for $15, or $60 for a year.
I agree that navigation is simple and effective, that Vendo and Epoch are fine billers.
But I can't agree the models are attractive.
Poor models, poor photography. And that kills the site for me.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Site theme is models with lots of tats and piercings.
-Recent videos have your choice of definition of 160p through 2160p for download.
-The streaming option is 288p through 2160p.
-There is a daily download limit of 300 GB for videos. Which is huge. That would allow you to download about 90 4K videos per day, or 353 720p videos per day. So I don't consider that a con at all.
-Customer support is excellent. There is 24/7 for email, telephone, and live chat. I suggest using live chat, since that's the fastest way to get a response.
-They use some recognizable stunt cocks, like Steve Holmes and Markus Dupree, as well as models like AVN hall of famer Joanna Angel. So the channel uses big name talent in this niche, which I think of as extreme hardcore goth. Not my cup of tea, since I like cute teens with minimal tats and piercing.
But it's a matter of taste. If goth sluts are your fetish, you could find plenty of content to your liking.
Cons:
-The main con is the navigation. Adult Time and it's channels are difficult to navigate. You can't easily get a listing of all the videos at a channel. Or all the models at a channel.
-Memberships need to be understood before you join. The monthly membership is usually streaming only. The simplest way to get downloading privileges is to get an annual membership, but most PU members only want to join for 1 month. There is a monthly membership that gives downloading privileges, but it's hidden, and not usually visible. I suggest using live chat, to see if customer support will offer you a discounted monthly rate that includes downloading privileges. I know at least one PU member who got a monthly Adult Time membership with downloading privileges for the same price as a monthly streaming only membership.
-The acting is terrible. The plots are unbelievable.
-No model bios.
Bottom Line:
Adult Time advertises itself as the only (porn) subscription you need.
I personally think that's over-hype.
There are plenty of other porn sites worth joining.
But for fans of hardcore sex, there's no denying that Adult Time gives you plenty of bang for your buck.
You get over 250 channels, 55,000 episodes and 8 releases per day.
That covers a wide variety of niches. And most of the content is high quality: no schlocky goods on sale that I can find.
With so many niches covered, there should be plenty of hardcore action to fill your hardcore needs.
Not everyone at the PU site is thrilled with the Adult Time network.
But I personally think the Adult Time network is one of the best bargains in porn today (and that is true for the last few years).
Burning Angel used to be a separate site. But it was folded into the Adult Time network a few years ago.
I don't believe it still exists as a separate site: it only exists as a channel in the Adult Time network. Does this make a difference in your membership to Burning Angel?
Yes.
As a channel in Adult Time, navigation in Burning Angel gives you what I consider the Fucked-Up Click Navigation System. Years ago, as a separate site, it was much easier to navigate through the Burning Angel content. In today's world, as part of Adult Time, you need nimble fingers to go Click-Click-Click to find what the hell the content is at Burning Angel. I've been a member of Adult Time for about 3 years now (I know, most PU members only join for 1 month at a time), but I think some of the channels are excellent, especially Pure Taboo, and there's plenty of content for me to find. I just wish the navigation was easier, so I could find the content that I like.
What is the site theme of Burning Angel?
Hardcore sex.
With models that are heavily tattooed and heavily pierced.
The sex is a mixture of boy-girl, 2-guys-1-girl, 2-guys-2-girls, girl-girl, blowjob, vaginal, anal, BDSM, cum drinking and swallowing.
The plots are simplistic, the acting is kindergarden-level.
To watch these videos, turn off your brain, or get really drunk, or snort a couple ounces of cocaine.
Note: some of these videos show the actors drinking cocaine. I've heard of snorting cocaine, smoking cocaine, injecting cocaine, but drinking coke is a new one on me.
I guess you have to watch Burning Angel to learn the uses of cocaine.
Don't use cocaine without the supervision of your medical doctor.
Coke can be dangerous to your health.
Anyway, the plots and acting of the models are at the kindergarden level.
The fake moans and groans of excitement are patently fake.
-Note: Many of these videos have been nominated and have won AVN awards.
AVN is the adult video industry trade magazine. Burning Angel videos have won best action thriller, best sex comedy scene, best actor, best director, etc. So even though I think these videos are trash, experts in porn think they are among the best videos in porn. I think these videos are shit. But porn professionals think many of these videos are pure gold.
You need to watch a few of these videos, to see if they fit your tastes.
I'm giving Burning Angel a score of 75. That's very subjective.
Main negatives are:
The navigation is terrible.
The plots are stupid.
The acting is terrible.
The main benefit of the channel is it makes you realize how wonderful some of the other channels really are.
Just noticed the same video posted at 18Videoz and Wow Girls.
This is the first time I've seen the same video posted at 18Videoz and also at Wow Girls.
I guess the Wow Girls site is running out of new content, so they are using content from other sources.
The video is titled "Dating Means Mating" at Wow Girls, posted 11 May 2021.
At Videoz, it's titled "Casual teen fuck on rainy day", posted Jul 31, 2019.
The video features Ariana Shaine, a cute teenager who puts on a really good show.
Glad to see she is featured at different porn sites.
But would like to see different material at each site I'm paying for.
LOL.
There are a few sites that will charge you for clicking on a hot link without a notice that you are agreeing to pay for the site, without a subsequent verification notice.
Apparently this is legal.
But glad you are able to get your money back.
I'm glad it went through so quickly.
And that you explained how you got the money.
I couldn't figure out how you would get the cash or credit, since I didn't include your name in the instructions, only your email address.
There can a small charge for sending cash/credit through PayPal, depending on how you do it.
If you want to send actual cash for pickup, there was a charge of around $5.50 or so.
But to send credit, unless you knows the bank account number or something, which I don't want or need to know, there was a charge of $1.50.
Thanks for checking.
Consider the $1.50 my personal gift to you.
The $50 came from PU, for your contributions to the site.
LOL.
Wraith,
I got your email at my Yahoo email address.
But the PU internal email system is unreliable.
I never got any of your emails from the PU system.
And you never got my email from the PU system.
Maybe PU will fix their email system one day.
In the past, I've send emails through the PU system, but most people never got those emails.
And there was no automatic notice the emails were lost, and never delivered.
Most email systems will notify you if an email was not delivered.
But not the PU email system.
Wraith,
I sent $50 at 5.13 pm PST today, 7-15-21.
Turns out you don't need a person's name.
All you need is an email address.
Not sure how this works, how you will get the money.
Let me know if there are any problems.
Because I figure they are going to charge me for the transfer, so what the heck.
If nothing else, it was worth it to see how this works.
Do you receive a check that you can deposit?
I don't see how you can get cash, from an email address.
But maybe there's a way.
But maybe I can figure out a way to send an Amazon gift card, in the future.
Whatever.
Send me your name and email address and I will send you $50 through PayPal.
I won the $300 prize yesterday, and want to share the wealth, in a small way.
Consider this an early Christmas present from the PU site.
No risk, no obligation.
Since the PU internal email service is so glitchy, send me the email to:
fakesharen009 (the at sign) yahoo.com.
Name and email address are required when sending cash through PayPal.
If you don't want the cash, just reply to this post, by saying: No thanks, not interested.
I've tried for over 1 hour to load the MetArt site in my Firefox browser.
All I get is a blank page.
Is the site under construction, maintenance, or under cyber attack?
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the 18Videoz network. You get access to the entire network of 17 sites with membership in any one of the sites.
-There is a model page for each model, with a nice-sized thumbnail to show what she looks like, along with a small listing of her physical details. But there is no model listing for the site.
There's supposed to be a way to bring up a model listing for the site, but I couldn't get it to work.
-Low membership fee of $60/year, with a PU discount. Otherwise, the listed price is $120/year.
Cons:
-18 Flesh is an archive site. The last update was in December 2011.
-Most of the 18Videoz sites are archive, that stopped updating years ago. So the quality of the videos is poor for most archive sites.
-Every so often your password is rejected. I don't know why. So you have to re-set it, which is easy to do.
-Login is secure. But the member pages are not secure.
-Ads on every page. The ads are thumbnails, that are not clearly defined as ads. If you click on an ad thumbnail, it brings up a new site for you to join.
-There is no text description of the video plot. Except the plot is little or nothing. You have a girl masturbating or exposing parts of her body, and a guy appears to have sex with her.
-You do have tags to describe the action, but they're almost un-nessary, because there's almost no plot, just sex.
-A lot of the girls are probably pretty teens or early twenties, but because of the poor picture quality, you can't appreciate how pretty these girls are.
Bottom Line:
Videos have a runtime of around 20 minutes.
Videos have a choice of 480p or 536p. On a 27" monitor, even for the higher resolution videos, the image is slightly out of focus. On a 14" monitor (such as a laptop) the image is not as much out of focus, except that I imagine most PU members would not accept viewing these videos because of the poor quality.
So the entire 18 Flesh site would be unacceptable, unless for historical interest. Or to see videos of a favorite model that retired years ago.
-There is a photo set of each video. The photo set is made up of screenshots, not photos.
There is no way to bring up the screenshots individually on your monitor. And there is no zip file for the photo set.
Years ago the site probably had a program to view the screen shots online, and probably had a zip file for the photo sets, but the online viewing program and the zip file download option seem to have disappeared.
-There is a search function to list models at the site/network, but I couldn't get it to work: couldn't bring up any model names, that fit any age range, debut date at the site or network, or dates videos were posted at the site/network.
Conclusion: site maintenance is hit or miss, mainly missing.
Bottom line summary:
The 18 Flesh site seems like a waste of opportunity and internet space.
Due to the poor quality of the videos, the videos are basically unwatchable.
There seem to be a lot of cute girls at the site, but the poor quality videos, and the screenshots you can't view onscreen or download, along with the poor search capability, make the site worthless.
They did upgrade the login to the network, and it's now https, which is secure.
But the member pages for the site/network are non-secure.
I'm giving the site a score of 58. I found nothing at the site (videos, screen caps) worth viewing.
Actually, I couldn't view any screencaps, because all I found were montages of the screen cap photosets.
And I've found much better videos at other paysites with a 536p definition that showed what the models looked like more clearly.
Looks like a nice site.
Sorry to keep harping on price, but membership is not cheap.
You would think that with old content deleted from sites, they would give you a bargain rate.
But I guess they think that if you want to view or collect this older content, you are willing to pay full price.
Mainly, I try to get full value for the dollars I spend.
So I will pass on this site, even though there are some videos I would like to see.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-This review is based on the Spank Monster channel of Adult Time. There is a separate Spank Monster site, but I would not recommend joining the original Spank Monster site for a few reasons.
See the Bottom Line summary section of this review to see why I would join AdulT Time instead of joining the Spank Monster site.
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded in definitions from 160p through 2160p.
-The production values are good to excellent: nice sets, cute teen models, excellent lighting, good sound control.
-Even though the plots soon get repetitious, and I think the stunt cock (Jay Rock) is sort of slow-witted because he keeps resisting these cute teen girls who want to fuck him, I have to give Jay credit for picking such cute teens for his step-daughters.
-The models are cute teens or early-twenties girls. Not a lot of tattoos, not a lot of make-up. Very few piercings (except for the belly-button stud).
Cons:
-This is an Adult Time channel. So the navigation could be much better. If you try to bring up the Spank Monster channel listing, it might not load. Or if you try to get around that by an aphabetical listing of channels to find the Spank Monster channel, you can find the alphabetical listing is not alphabetical, but out of order.
-The camera work could be better. The video sometimes get out of focus. And it can have jumps, which should be edited better. Really, Jay Rock should hire a videographer to shoot the videos, which would make the videos better, except he probably figures the videos are good enough without the expense of hiring a videographer.
-There is no text file to explain the plot. But most videos have the same plot of the step-daughter seducing the step-father. Or a step-brother having sex with his step-sister.
-Few tags to describe the video. So searching by tags is not worthwhile.
-There are no model bios for the channel.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
Reasons for joining Adult Time (which has a Spank Monster channel) instead of joining the original Spank Monster site:
-Membership in the original Spank Monster site is expensive. 12-month membership is $150.
You can join Adult Time for $95/year, or less if you join on a holiday discount.
-Spank Monster site is streaming only.
Spank Monster channel includes unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads.
Actually, there is a daily limit of 300GB at Adult Time, but unless you are a porn fanatic trying to download the entire network, that limit should never affect you. So I consider that unlimited downloads, rather than having to state in every review of the network that there is a 300 GB daily download limit.
-If you join the Adult Time network, you get access to over 55,000 hardcore videos, and over 50,000 photo galleries. Covering a wide variety of porn niches, with 1,000s of porn models.
If you join Spank Monster site, you gain access to over 100 videos, featuring about 100 porn models.
So Spank Monster site has limited content, compared to Adult Time, which has a huge amount of content.
Enough said. The advantages of Adult Time over Spank Monster site are self-evident.
The Spank Monster channel has 53 videos. This is 44% of the 120 videos at the Spank Monster site.
The models at Spank Monster are mainly cute young teens.
Mostly white. You do have a few Black, Asian, Latino models, but very few.
Spank Monster channel has 53 videos.
The runtime for a video is around 33 minutes.
The videos are available for streaming and/or download in 160p or 240p through 2160p.
There is an accompanying photo set for each video.
The photo sets have about 15 pictures per set.
There is a zip file for the photo sets, that downloads with a generic file name, such as 120595.zip.
So you have to re-name the file, if you want to add the model's name, date posted, site, etc.
But I don't know if the sets are worth collecting:
-The models are cute, but the set is a small number of photos.
-Some photos can be out of focus, or poorly framed.
-The main use of a photo set would be to download the set, pick the best photo that shows the model in a pose you like, and keep that photo with the video, to illustrate what the model looks like. And delete the rest of the photo set.
Spank Monster is a new site, started in 2021.
But in a sense, it's a clone of the Jays POV site.
Not a true clone, but the videos at the site (and Adult Time channel) follow the same plot that the Jays POV videos follow:
-You have a stunt cock (Jay Rock) who plays the step-daddy who is seduced into having sex with his step-daughter.
-Or Jay Rock can play the step-brother who has faux incest sex (faux, because these are step-relations, not blood relations) with his step-sister.
- Jay Rock is the stunt cock at Spank Monster, and also the stunt cock at Jays POV. He opened this site because another site will add revenue to his wealth, but there's no difference between this site/channel and the Jays POV site in theme or plot. So unless you are a super-fan of Jay Rock, join the Adult Time network for your Jay Rock fix.
Bottom Line Summary:
Forget the repetitious plots. The lame dialogue. The sometimes poor POV camera work. Some of these cute teens are so fucking adorable you wish you could be the one in bed with them instead of Jay Rock.
The girls put on a good show of seducing Jay Rock.
The videos are good to excllent. Mainly because of the cuteness of the models, but the videos are professionally shot from the POV viewpoint, which is not the greatest. I prefer a standard shooting technique which gives you better camera angles. But the sets are expensive, and the technical features (lighting, sound control) are good to excellent.
I'm giving the Spank Monster channel of the Adult Time network a score of 90.
Mainly because of how cute the girls are.
I don't like the POV camera-work, the lame scripts and dialogue.
So your personal score could be lower.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
