I look at Gianna Dior's porn history.
Seems like she started in 2018.
She appeared in a huge amount of porn since starting.
Solo, gg, bg, bgg, softcore, hardcore.
I counted over 100 sites she has content at, at one index listing of her.
So in what sense could it be her first time?
First time at what?
Do you take that on faith?
My best guess is that by first time, the most honest basis would be: first time at this site.
For what that's worth.
Porn is fantasy. You wrote, "I know some collectors are into first time performances."
Which is true.
But it seems like the site is selling hot air.
Note: I'm not a member of the site. Maybe the Gianna Dior scene is from the start of her career.
In which case this comment carries very little weight.
Excellent review, covers the over-view and also a lot of fine details for the site.
You should post reviews more often.
They are worth reading.
Both for the ease of reading, and the fine details they include.
(By ease of reading, I mean the review is well-written, and a pleasure to read.)
Several months ago someone floated the idea of giving the best-written review of the month a special prize in the raffle.
That didn't happen.
But if there was such a prize, I would nominate this review.
I am watching less porn recently.
Maybe the virus has some effect.
But a lot of what is being produced is less enjoyable.
But that could also be me.
The older you get, the slower you get.
Which is natural, but still disappointing.
I'm being nit-picky.
So please excuse the objection, if you want to.
You write "This network was a complete ripoff."
I think you meant to write the "site" was a complete ripoff.
Because you gave the network (Team Skeet) a score of 95, and previously wrote that Team Skeet is one of your favorite networks.
But it's obvious that this part of the Team Skeet network is poor.
And has lots of problems that need to be fixed.
Which are useful objections.
Broken links, non-exclusive content, download limits that are troubling for 4K users, cancellation problems.
So a score of 60 is fair.
And the review serves a worthwhile purpose in pointing out the site problems.
I don't know whether some sites are re-mastering old content, but I do know that some sites are re-posting old content from their own site or from other sites.
Some of the content was shot over 10 years ago.
I don't think most of the recently re-posted old content was re-mastered.
But unless you have followed these porn models, you wouldn't be aware that the content was re-posted.
The tip-off is that many of these models retired many years ago.
So if you are seeing "new" content from them, it's just that you haven't seen it before, not that it's really new.
But at least for most of us, it is "new" content, that we never saw, or forgot about.
This is happening with some of the MetArt sites, and the Digital Desire site, and with other fine sites.
Porn sites are definitely running out of new material.
So they are using old material and hoping we don't complain.
LOL.
But it's still better than if they stopped their updates altogether.
On a sad note: the corona virus is not going away any time soon.
In the USA, it's actually getting worse.
They were saying before that we would be getting a break in the virus by now, before it would come back in the fall.
But that isn't happening.
The death toll in the USA keeps rising.
(Sorry for the sad news. Just ignore it if you prefer.)
You're too young to remember, but when TVs were still new, people would sit in their living rooms, and watch the TV, after the stations stopped broadcasting their content.
They were so fascinated by the new invention, that they would watch the station broadcast the station icon. I remember that channel 5 was an Indian chieftan with a headdress on the test pattern.
When VCRs came out, and I got my first VCR player, I would watch every movie to the end, no matter how bad the movie was.
It was the thrill of watching a movie in my own home.
A movie that I had rented.
With no commercials.
It seems strange to remember those times, but the new experience was exciting.
Nowadays, I start to watch a movie, and if don't like it, I turn it off after a few minutes.
The thrill is long gone, And I don't have the patience to watch junk any more.
Even movies that I remember really enjoying, don't have the same impact that they used to.
Which is a shame.
I don't enjoy life as much as I used to.
The last update to Tricky Masseur (part of the Teen Mega World network) was May 17, 2020.
Before then, they were updating with 1 video (plus photoset) per month.
A slow update rate, but better than nothing.
Tricky Masseur is one of my favorite sites at the network.
I think the massage theme is well suited to porn.
It requires little acting skills, since the model just lies on the massage table, gets stroked until she is aroused, and then fucked.
I'm hoping they re-start the updates at the site.
The site videos seem simple to make, not expensive, so I don't know why they stopped.
Unless it's the corona virus effect, where most porn seems to be slowly shutting down.
These additional sites are throw-away sites, archive sites that have not updated in years.
The quality of the sites is poor: A small amount of content, the quality of the videos is poor:
The video definition is your choice of 240p or 480p, and most PU members would not watch these videos because of the low definition, the poor visual quality. Unless you have an interest in low quality porn videos from years ago, you will skip these videos entirely.
Unless the network wants to spend the time and money to re-master these videos, they are basically wasted network space.
Am I being harsh. No. These videos were perfectly fine porn from many years ago, when they were first shot, but today's PU members require excellent videos that are at least 720 to 1080p, and some require 4K videos for their viewing enjoyment. And the definition is only part of the lower quality of these videos, because there are other technical factors that degrade the quality of these videos compared to today's standards.
SexArt $5.00 for 30 days.
RabbitsReviews shows that discount.
Since I'm a member of SexArt already, I can't tell if this is streaming only, or if it includes downloads.
(When I click on the offer hot link, I open a member page of the SexArt site, and not the offer site details--since I'm already a member.)
MetArt $5.00 for 30 days.
Same thing. I don't know if that includes downloads.
I'm a sucker for low-priced deals.
Except I'm already a member of both sites, so those deals don't interest me.
Maybe you should post this as comment on Adult Time.
Posting this a reply to my comment means most people won't see this information.
If you post it as a comment by itself, it will be seen by people more easily.
I don't download very much any more, and don't stream a lot lately.
But for people who do a lot of downloads and a lot of streaming, it would be good to know.
When I wrote that Adult Time was offering unlimited streaming, I was repeating what the advertising stated.
But the advertising can be wrong.
I didn't do a numerical count of the photosets and videos.
I just took those numbers, and the number of models, from some page or other.
Too lazy to go through the hassle of viewing all the pages of their models and videos and trying to add them for a single count.
I figured that a general figure was enough to give an idea of the amount of the content.
My last join was a few years ago.
So I don't have specific knowledge of the exact content from a few years ago (my memory is not great).
My review basically paints a picture of a site that could have existed in the 1970, if the internet had existed back then. With photo sets and videos that are in the style of the 1970s (except the internet wasn't around then).
Does the site update? Yes.
You get 1 or 2 new videos per week.
Are all of the videos new?
The video of Jana Cova, posted Mar 4, 2020, and Jillian Janson, posted Mar 9, 2020, might be older videos, since I don't know if these models retired. I had assumed they retired, and these videos might have been shot years ago, but I'm not an expert on them.
Neither one of the videos I selected were up to the quality of many of the Digital Desire videos I've seen over the years: the videos lack the sharpness and color vibrancy of the standard Digital Desire videos, which were excellent and outstanding quality.
Actually, I much prefer the older videos of my favorite models, such as Kenze Thomas.
Those videos just make the models much more appealing. For me, at least.
The photo sets and videos have a posted date.
So I assume that they are posting new material, or at least material that has been updated.
I've only started my membership at the site, so I don't have a good over-view yet.
But so far, my impression is that I prefer the older content: there are so many beautiful girls, that were photographed so exquisitely. And the videos were softer. Not as much emphasis on the solo masturbation. More of a tease, although there was plenty of nudity.
But yes, they are updating with new models, in the photosets and videos.
But I prefer the older content on the site.
I'm a current member of the Wow Girls site.
Not on their staff, just a regular member.
I have no idea why you are being blocked.
My suggestion would be to have a live chat with Vendo.
The Vendo website has live chat 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Live chat is immediate, you don't have to wait for an email response.
Also, you can get a written record of what they say, if you copy and paste the chat to a text file.
Click on the "live chat with support" hot link, and a popup box appears.
Fill in the information, and you should be connected with a live chat operator within a few minutes.
Since you don't have a sub with them yet, just give your name, and your email address you want to use.
Vendo also has email support and telephone support, but I've used their live chat, and you get a fast response, within a few minutes or less.
Explain your problem, and see if they can solve your problem.
Separately, on the join page for Wow Girls, there are 2 pre-checked cross-sales for other sites.
Make sure you uncheck those pre-checked cross-sales, or else you will be signing up for a trial to 2 other different web sites, and the trials turns into very expensive subs that you can get much cheaper elsewhere.
Tom D Admin, did you ever post the tally for the June 17, 2020 raffle?
The number of points each entrant had for the raffle?
I am curious to see that listing.
Also, instead of putting news items in the Announcements section, which most PU members and visitors probably don't see, it would be better to post the news items on a new thread, which more members and visitors are able to see easily.
Unless you are looking around the site because you have a lot of extra time, most people overlook the Announcement section, I believe, and miss the Announcements.
Sticking the news in a new thread makes the news/Announcements more easily seen.
So those sites might be buried in the Adult Time network, as well.
Just guessing, I figure your chance of accessing the old lesbo101 content is slim, if you join Fame Digital directly, or join Adult Time directly.
You can check tube sites, which often have condensed versions of some videos from other sites. That would be your best chance of finding some content from the lesbo101 site, but you would only get a small number of hits, and the quality of the videos might be sub-standard, from what was offered at the original lesbo101 site.
Bottom line: redirecting from a dead site to a currently active site is a marketing ploy. There's no guarantee you will find the old dead site content at the currently active site.
I watch most of my porn on my laptop.
Even though I also have a desktop, which has a bigger and brighter and better monitor.
The laptop is easier to use.
But the desktop gives a much better image.
Convenience rules.
X-Art and SuperHot seem to be marketed as two sites for one.
$99.95/6 months subscription to both sites, recurring every 6 months.
There's probably a way to subscribe to X-Art by itself.
There's also a simpler way to subscribe to SuperHot by itself, for $49.95/year.
And if you are a creator, model, or photographer, you can get a free account to SuperHot, and get paid for your content, mesages, contests, etc.
Exactly what SuperHot is, I'm not sure.
And the public preview page shows almost nothing.
But $99.95/6 months for X-Art, even if it comes with the unknown SuperHot, seems very expensive.
I'm wondering how many subscribers are paying those prices, especially since the updates for X-Art seem to be very slow.
Maybe one new update per week, or less. X-Art had a lot of gorgeous models in the past, and the videos and photosets were high quality glamour, but they seem to have priced themself way too high to join.
The Best Porn states there is a new review of X-Art "completed on May 22, 2020 and will be released in less than a week."
It's now June 02, 2020, and the last review posted was released Oct 2, 2019.
October to May is about 7 months, so the latest posted review is only 7 months old.
I'm surprised they did a re-review so soon, even if they have not released it yet.
RabbitsReviews shows a link to join X-Art for $9.95 for the first month, rebilling at $19.95/month.
But the link connects to the X-Art site, and when you hit the join page link, it shows a join price of $99.95/6 months for a sub to X-Art and SuperHot, recurring at $99.95/6 months, and a $40/month sub to X-Art and SuperHot.
Excellent review.
Easy to read, covers the highlights of the site.
Makes me want to join, even though I already have too many subs to look at already.
But I will definitely put this on my to-join-next list, when I finally have more time.
I've been a member of this site before, and enjoyed it.
But there's so much great porn out there, there's just not enough time in a day or a week or even in a year to visit all the fine sites that are worth joining.
I've had many subs through Vendo, and never had a problem with them.
And cancelling a sub through them, on their website, is simple and easy.
And you automatically get a confirming email of your cancellation, with the date on which your sub expires.
So I think Vendo is excellent, up there with CCBill and Epoch.
I just cancelled a sub to Wet And Puffy today, and it was easy.
Thanks for the generous helping of information.
I believe you're right, the problem was with Firefox, not with Windows.
The new version of Down Them All is much harder to use, and I haven't tried to learn how to use it.
The old version of Down Them All was much simpler, easy to use.
At the moment, I'm kind of snowed with problems.
I got a re-newed desktop, which I'm learning to use.
And, off topic, I have a bunch of cavities in my teeth, which are going to be slow and expensive to fix, as well as freaken painful. The freaken pain has already started, and that's before they have pulled any teeth yet.
So until I get the time and energy (and ambition--at the moment, all I want to do is crawl into bed and hope the pain goes away), I won't be trying your excellent suggestion.
I think someone else suggested something similar a while back, but I didn't follow up on it, because I was thinking an older version of firefox might be more open to viruses.
But I hope to try your old version of firefox with the old down them all, because it was so easy to use.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
