REVIEW(CONTINUED):
Riding her therapist's dick with her full tits bouncing gets Britney moaning and gasping with delight, but she's not fully satisfied quite yet. That pinnacle of delight doesn't come until Britney is bent over her chair getting her fuck hole pounded from behind while she dreams of her stepdad. After briefly sucking her therapist's dick one last time, Britney lets him fuck her until he cums all over her belly just like she wishes her stepdaddy would do."
The model/actor playing the therapist is a poor actor. No one bothered to write a script for him to act. You can tell he's just making up words to tell Brittany Light. I've met salesmen who could lie and throw the bull shit convincingly, but this guy is not smooth or convincing.
Britney Light is much more convincing as a pretty young teen with the problem that she is attracted to her stepfather. And she is so cute, with such a soft sweet voice, all you want to do is comfort with a gentle fuck and maybe a harder fuck if she starts to moan and groan a lot.
You can tell I am enjoying this site far more than the That Sitcom Show site, which is the other bonus site you get when joining Nubiles Film.
For one thing, these models are more attractive.
For another, the plots are less intrusive.
You can focus on what you'd like to do to these girls easier.
I had no connection with That Sitcom Show site. I didn't think it was erotic. I didn't enjoy the parodies.
But looking at the models at Hot Crazy Mess, I felt like a dirty old man again. Better yet, a dirty young man. The teen models are so cute,
your mind feels like it's 18 years old again. With all the urges.
REVIEW(CONTINUED):
Cons:
-Archive site. Last video posted 2020-01-03. That is the main con, they won't be updating this site.
The site score of 88 is because I really like the videos at this site. The girls are attractive, they seem like sweet young women, not porn sluts. Maybe that's narrow-minded of me. I don't hold being in porn against the models, but I like and am more comfortable with the idea or fantasy of a sweet young thing having sex, instead of a porn slut having sex.
And these girls are really attractive. I mean fucking attractive. Physically. And mentally (the image of a sweet young thing, instead of a porn star slut).
And the plot, although it's meant to act as the setup for the sex, does not get in the way too much: you can focus on the attractive girl, and the sex that is going to happen.
And the female models do a good job acting their roles. Better than the stunt cocks, who seem like lame actors in comparison to how well the female models act.
Or maybe I'm looking at the female models and thinking what I'd like to do to them, and that increases their acting ability, because their actions are less jarring than the stunt cock actions and voices.
The female models project the image of sweet young things.
They could have hired better stunt cocks, who had better acting ability.
But the focus is on the models instead of the stunt cocks.
Which is as it should be.
I really enjoy this site. Think it makes a nice addition to the Nubile Films site as a bonus.
Compared to ThatSitComShow site, which is boring bonus.
Description of a sample video:
"Deviant Thoughts - S2:E1"
"Britney Light is seeing a therapist for her deviant thoughts regarding her stepdad. She selected this therapist because his methods are unconventional, but they work. The therapist starts by having Britney close her eyes to visualize the most sexually exciting scenario with her stepdad that she can and then describe it. Then he tells her to take off her panties and imagine the scenario playing out as she masturbates. While the therapist describes the salacious situation, he can't help but whip out his stiffie and start stroking it because he finds Britney and her fantasies so hot.
The next step in Britney's therapy is to substitute her therapist for her stepdad. He lets her know that his cock is now her stepdad's cock so she can use it to play out her fantasies. Although Britney is a little hesitant at first, she agrees to start sucking. Soon she's lost in her own desire as she gobbles that cock and then climbs on top to take it all the way into her dripping pussy.
CONTINUED IN NEXT REPLY:
I remember visiting the Netherlands and Denmark in the early 1990s.
As a tourist, we were charged higher prices than what our tour guides were paying, for the items. I thought it was a rip-off, but we were on a tour, and that's the way it worked.
Unfair, but when we were in a group at some stops, that's what happened.
But I've read in the past, that PU members in Europe often have to pay higher prices, because of regional pricing. Which could be because of the credit card company, or the pay site processor, or some other reason.
But if there is some legal way to get around it, it would be helpful to know, for our European members. To get better prices.
I thought That Sitcom Show site was a waste of time, because the videos were so boring.
But I also thought the videos were well made (good acting, strong plots, good production values).
So maybe someone might enjoy the videos.
If you are still a member of Nubile Films, I strongly recommend you should check out the Hot Crazy Mess site.
For one, the models are much more attractive.
For another, there is some variation in the models: although mainly slender white teens, there are some black and latina models that you might like.
And, for me at least, I found a bunch of really cute girls, and the videos were much hotter.
I didn't like the POV camera-work very much. They needed a professional on the camera, that would have been less jerky in the filming.
But cute girls plus some hot sex make for a fine site.
Like I say, if you are still have access, check the site out.
It might make up for the disappointing parody site.
Also, you were disappointed with joining the Nubile Films site.
But the site itself is well worth joining, with a lot of excellent content (videos and photosets). I think it's one of the better hardcore teen sites on the internet. There are many fine hardcore teen sites available. Which is a good thing, in my opinion.
An embarrassment of riches.
The prices you quote seem very high to me.
They are far higher than what a person in the United States (USA) pays.
Are those the prices you see when you use the PU link to go to the join page at the Vixen site?
If so, can you use a VPN to change the location your computer shows?
Year-long memberships to a VPN can be very cheap.
And with a VPN, you can choose a location in the US, as the computer link location.
And I would assume you would see much lower membership prices.
I would assume, but not really sure, that your credit card company (if that's how you fund your membership) would charge a small premium for converting your payment to US dollars, but it should still be far less than the prices you are quoting in your review.
I'm not a lawyer, so I assume what I'm suggesting is legal.
But you seem to be paying far too much for this membership.
Are there special taxes you pay, in addition to conversion rates, for a membership to pay site, and that's why your fees are so high?
The normal PU discount is:
Monthly: $24.95 the first month (recurring recurs at $29.95/mo.)
Year: $99.95 (recurring)
And there are often holiday specials, when the price can drop to around $10 or $15 for the first month,
I suggest checking out what a good, cheap VPN would cost for a year or multi-year membership.
Most of them give a free trial of a few weeks or more.
VPN means your computer is safer from hacking.
But some services don't allow you to be connected to a VPN while you use them.
For example, Netflix will not allow you to use a VPN to connect to their service.
Just a suggestion.
But the prices you are paying for Vixen (and maybe other porn sites) seem very high. Much higher than what US customers pay.
Thanks for the update.
Whenever you have the time, it's fine to write a review.
Stay healthy.
I've read that experiencing the virus can be a terrible ordeal.
Wishing you well, but try to stay healthy.
Glad you're able to work, because many people have been laid off.
Seems like it's either too much or too little, for those with jobs.
Crazy situation.
An interesting review.
Some nice details and thoughts.
It's also interesting how some sites can seem to suddenly become popular.
There have been 5 reviews of this site in the last 2 months.
Then, in 2019, there were 3 reviews of the site in a 2-month period.
The site doesn't attract me, because of the pay system for cam shows, which I don't usually bother with anyway.
I don't like the site splitting scenes into parts, instead of making a scene available as a single video. Also don't like the delay between Action 1 and Action 2.
But your review is just interesting and readable.
I don't know why.
It just strikes me as one of the best reviews I've read recently.
Good one.
I'm a member of Nubile Films, have too many memberships to visit the sites I'm paying for very often, which is a waste of money.
My eyes are bigger than what I can use.
But thanks for the update.
I had no idea Nubile Films has the bonus sites.
I will definitely check them out.
Nubile Films, by itself, is a fine site, worth joining for itself.
And with the holiday discount (or whatever they call this discount), Nubile Films seems like a real bargain.
Separately, I hope you write a review of the Mormon Girlz site, as a warning to PU members that the site is poor join because of the limited content.
A review is much more visible than a comment on the site.
Girls Under Arrest is listed as a pay site by The Best Porn.
isthisreal is an adult time live series.
The public page (not the member page) of IsThisReal shows:
Adult Time
Live Series
Daily cam shows.
Free for members (of the Adult Time network, I assume).
I'm not very interested in cam shows.
But if you are a member of Adult Time, you can check out what the isthisreal series/channel offers.
The difference between a site, a channel, or a series seems to be blurred.
On a different public page, at least 2 of the Girls Under Arrest, Nocturnal Massage, Sister's Sex Tape, and some other series (or channels) are listed under the IsThisReal public page, so I assume all those series are part of the IsThisReal channel, as well as being part of the Adult Time network.
If you are a member of Adult Time, you can check out one or more of those series/channels/sites/whatEverYouCallThem yourself.
Because of the poor lighting, the skin tones of the models are poor: they don't look attractive or life-like.
If they deleted the channel, I think the value of network would improve, because I don't think the videos add any value to the network.
But if you're in the mood to watch some POV videos of fake cops abusing girls with blow jobs and hard fucking, you can fill that urge at this channel.
REVIEW(CONTINUED):
When a cop finds a teen girl who is good-looking, and she appears to have done something wrong, the cop reveals his human side: a blowjob and a fuck will usually get the girl off with a warning.
The site does not publish how many cops have sex with possible teen criminals.
This is supposed to be reality porn.
The site was started 2018.
The site has 11 videos.
The last video update was 2019-03-28.
So it's an archive site.
It should be easy examing 11 videos to see what the site has to offer:
The models are OK to good: Hannah Hays, Gia Valentina, Honey Gold, Alex Blake, Khloe Kapri, Kendra Spades and Julie Kay are all ready to show you what happens when you resist arrest in front of a big cop with a gun.
Many of the scenes take place at night. The lighting is poor. You can't see clearly what the mdels look like, whiat is happening. The camera work is poor: they are trying to film the video as POV, and the actors and camera are moving, so the camera is not centered on the action very well. Maybe it's supposed to add an element of realism to the scene, but I prefer to see clearly what is happening.
So, I don't like the lighting (too dark), the sound control (they are shooting outdoors, which requires better control over the sound than a studio shoot), poor placement of the camera (they are moving around outdoors, which is harder to film ant an indoor scene).
So the overall quality of the video technique is blow par.
Video runtime averages aroun 30 - 37 minutes.
You can stream videos: 288p through 1080p.
You can download the vidoes 160p through 1080p.
File sized for the different definiton downloads seem a little large: the 37 minute video at 1080p is 3.05 GB.
I'm giving the channel a low score of 59.
The channel is an archive, the channel stopped updating about 1 year after it started.
The main problems: the channel is small, 11 videos.
The quality of the videos is poor: this is because they were trying to make POV videos, at night, where the lighting was dark, the cameras could not be centered on the action because the models were moving around.
REVIEW CONTINUED IN THE NEXT REPLY:
Wraith0711, it would be nice if you posted a review of the Mormon Girlz site.
Just to give PU readers a warning on the site.
rearadmiral did an excellent review on the Mormon Girlz in 2016.
It covered his thoughts and reactions to the site.
He thought it was a good site, giving it a score of 87.
FreeMac did a review of the Mormon Girlz site a year later, and was seriously disappointed.
He gave the site a score of 60.
He wrote that the site had eliminated almost half their content, and that this destroyed most of the value of a site membership.
The Best Porn (the sister site of Porn Users) released a review of Mormon Girlz in 2017-09-01, around the same time as the FreeMac review. They gave the site a score of 76, which seems very generous, considering the limited content of the site, and the slow update rate.
A quote from The Best Porn review in 2017:
"Strangely, MormonGirlz has eliminated almost half of their videos, which I don't quite understand. There used to be nearly 150 scenes."
So if the site dropped half of their content, and the site is still small, that would obviously hurt the value of the site.
The site used to be (before they dropped half of their content) an interesting niche.
They did a fine job of making videos showing the inner workings of the Mormon church (fantasy videos, not real).
On a practical basis, I mainly join sites that offer a network.
Limited funds, so I want access to a bunch of content.
Obviously, not all sites have the same value: But the content of a single site, especially when it's a premium site, has to be really special for me to join.
Sites like MetArt, Femjoy, MPL Studios etc. are excellent sites with outstanding content that I have joined over the years.
I even have a lifetime membership in MetArt and a few of the other MetArt network sites. That I regret paying for, because I am losing my appreciation of those sites lately. But that's just me.
But again, your review of Mormon Girlz would serve as a warning for PU readers to avoid the site as a waste of money.
Responding to the coronavirus pandemic, Adult Time has started a new series about doing Yoga.
You can watch and do this series at home.
In a safe and healthy manner.
Perhaps it will even relieve stress.
Only 1 episode so far, and if the virus evaporates like dear Donald Trump predicted by April, maybe we won't need further episodes after all.
Adult Time seems to start new series, and run out of steam quickly, at times. Or maybe they have too many channels to watch, and not enough talent to keep building them up.
But I still think Adult Time has some great content.
The Pure Taboo is my favorite channel here.
A movie-like experience for watching twisted porn.
REVIEW(CONTINUED):
The Relaxxxed channel tries to make their videos individualized, and it doesn't work that well. Keep it simple works better.
BOTTOM LINE SUMMARY:
Pros:
Relaxxxed is part of the Lets Doe It network, with 130 videos.
Cons:
Archive site, last update was almost 2 years ago.
I didn't find any videos at the channel that I really liked.
The models at the site are just OK, not very attractive.
I'd give the channel a score of 72, because it needs to improve to be a worthwhile channel.
Actually, there are far better channels at the network, and since this is an archive, if they eliminated the channel, the network would be improved.
Normally, you think that more content improves the value of a network.
But if a channel falls below the quality of the network, eliminating the channel improves the
value of the network. Why have trash cluttering up some really good channels?
Maybe it's just me, but most of the male models at Hot Guys Fuck give off a gay or bi vibe.
The male models do a fine job fucking the girls.
And the male models are young and attractive.
But they just seem gay, to me.
Mormon Girls is a premium series at Team Skeet. Mormon Girlz, I believe, is a different pay site from a different company.
There are so many porn sites, some of which have similar names, so it becomes confusing to tell them apart.
But I believe Mormon Girlz is not included in the Team Skeet package. Mormon Girlz is a nice niche site that focuses on Mormon sex, which is probably what Mormon Girls does.
It's been a while since I was a member of Team Skeet.
But they seem to be expanding with a lot of different offerings, and some upgrades.
But $289/year seems like a lot of money.
You could almost buy a lifetime membership to some fine sites for a little more money.
For fans of the Team Skeet network, it might be a good choice.
However, if you do a lot of searching, you can sometimes find a yearly membership to Team Skeet for a low price.
The last time I joined was $60/year, in 2017, for the standard Team Skeet network (not including the premium sites). But it did include unlimited streaming and downloading.
When I say attractive, there are good-looking girls, some really gorgeous girls: the girls at Wow Girls, Wow Porn, X-Art, Blacked, Tushy, Vixen are presented more attractively and can be incredibly lovely, but the models at 21 Naturals can be attractive.
Not everyone appreciates this channel or the Adult Time network as much as I do.
Some PU members consider the sex at 21 Naturals bland and boring.
And the Adult Time network has critics who complain about the quality of the content not being top notch, or flawed in different ways.
That's people. Different people, different opinions.
I think the Adult Time network is one of the best bargains in porn today.
A low price, covering a wide variety of niches, high quality hardcore porn videos, unlimited streaming and downloading, and one of the best customer service reps in the business (because of the 24/7 live chat line).
I also think Pure Taboo, one of the Adult Time channels, is the best story-driven channel on the internet. Just a few of their better videos are worth the membership price by themselves.
Although most porn models are not actors, the Pure Taboo channel gives some of them the chance to really shine, and provide an erotic movie-quality experience.
Maybe I should add that Pure Taboo (one of the Adult Time channels) is probably my favorite story-based porn.
Some of the stories can be interesting. Even though they often border on the un-believable or strange, the stories can add meaning to the sex, and the sex can be hot. It also helps that the models can be attractive.
So I don't mind if a scene spends a lot of time on the set-up, if the set-up is done well.
Excellent review, as usual.
But I don't agree with with one of your cons.
"The only major con is that the sex scenes themselves are often too short with the bulk of them being under 30 minutes and nearly 1500 of them being under 15 minutes."
This is not a criticism of the review or your ideas.
But I personally find that sex scenes that go over 15 minutes start to get boring or repetitious for me.
I like the idea that there is a setup to the sex scene to give the sex more meaning than 2 or more bodies slapping together.
But when the sex goes on too long (and I think 15 minutes is plenty long for a sex scene) then I start to lose interest. Maybe it's my mind just doesn't appreciate all the details of sex, but I don't usually consider sex an endurance contest, and, while I can admire some of these models for their stamina, I personally prefer a much shorter version where the models start slow, then build up to a climax. A sex scene that goes 15 to 30 minutes usually indicates multiple orgasms for the female, which doesn't turn me on. Get the model hot, get her off, then cuddle or show appreciation, or don't show appreciation, whatever fits the scene.
That's just me.
Other people can have different ideas or appreciations.
Excellent first review.
Nice details with real thoughts and reactions.
Hope you stick around, and write more reviews, post comments, whatever you feel like doing.
As far as the raffle is concerned, I believe it's currently being held once a month.
The last raffle was the first one in the once-a-month program.
So the frequency can change, the prize money can change.
But consider the raffle prizes as an extra bonus: the main purpose of the reviews is to give your fellow PU members a heads-up on the value of sites, whether they are worth joining or not.
Of course, a person's interest play a large part in the sites they choose to join.
Excellent review.
You put a lot of time and effort into making the review a good overview with lots of nice details.
Nice to see you contributing again.
If you look at the Beata Undine page at Indexxx.com (a free database of porn stars), you will find that Beata has been featured in a large number of porn sites.
If you want to find additional material for her, it should be very easy.
The indexxx.com page shows the sites she has be featured at, as well as the number of appearances at each site.
Diamond status refers to the old system of membership, where there were different levels of membership.
If you had diamond status, you had access to the three sites:
All Fine Girls Wow Girls Wow Porn
Under the current system, you are automatically given access to those three sites, if you join any one of the sites.
The All Fine Girls site was created by using the 18 Only Girls site, plus a small amount of content from some other sites. Most of the content from the other sites was dropped, and the site names were dropped/ended as well.
That happened several years ago.
As far as I know, there are no archive sites in the 3 sites I mentioned.
However, there are non-member sites that hold some photosets and videos from the 3 sites, that might hold some other content that was dropped.
You can also find some of the 3 sites' content on tube sites.
No problem.
I was trying to show some of the differences between the Rocco Siffredi channel and the Rocco Siffredi site.
But whether a person finds the review useful, interesting, or readable, depends on the person.
Different strokes for different folks, as they used to say back in the 1970s.
You can easily find reviews that say some movie is wonderful, while a different review says it's a piece of crap.
I'm going for the idea that reviews can vary widely.
And still be useful.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
