Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Download managers are allowed, but please configure them to open one stream only to the server at the same time or your account will be blocked automatically. I rarely use a download manager, so this isn't a problem.
-Username and password are case sensitive. I copy and paste username and password, so no problem.
-No pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Very unusual for a porn site.
-CCBill was the default biller. An excellent biller. Never had a problem with them. Cancelling my membership should be easy.
-Access to the site is automatic, with no login needed, if you have cookies enabled.
-The technical features for viewing a photo or a photoset online are amazing: you can easily enlarge the photo by small percentages, and view portions of a single photo in detail. The best site for viewing photosets online I've seen so far. With amazingly beautiful models. The problem is that the photos seem so sterile. These are softcore glamcore photosets, but to me, they are non-erotic.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Movies have a trailer, if you want a preview of the video.
-Photographs are clear, crisp images, excellent colors and lighting, but surprisingly sterile, non-erotic, even though the images are of very lovely nude women. I don't know why the site is so unappealing for me. The models are uniformly gorgeous.
CONS(START OF):
-Comments (on photosets and videos) are allowed, but they are moderated. Unconstructive remarks or insulting/derogatory language or html links will be deleted. Many of the comments I've seen so far are not worth reading.
-In spite of the lovely models, a defect of the site is the over-use of the main photographer, Petter Hegre. He can lack imagination in his photos. Metart and many other glamour sites use a combination of contributing photographers, so you get different styles and ideas. Whereas at Hegre, the photosets can start to seem repetitious, in spite of the physical beauty of the models.
Bottom Line:
-It's been many years since I was a member of Hegre. The site has many of the most beautiful models in the world. What is different from Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy or other fine glamour photo sites? Nothing much, as far as I can tell. All these sites (and others) feature gorgeous women stunningly photographed. I'm not a connoisseur: I just enjoy looking at fine-looking women.
-The main value of any glamour porn site is the model listing: how attractive are the models?
The models at Hegre are among the most attractive women on the planet. If you're into fine looking women ages 18 to early 30s, this site has plenty of models that are worth viewing.
I'm looking at hannah, a white, slender model born April 1999, which would make her 22 years old. She is fucking gorgeous. She has 6 galleries and 2 movies at Hegre.
The photosets can be repetitious.
Hannah has 6 photosets.
In 5 of them she is completely nude, from start to finish.
In one set she starts off wearing a black top, black pants, black shoes and black socks.
The main difference of the 5 completely nude sets is:
1 set has a floor and a wall, and is empty of anything except the naked model.
A second set with a floor and wall, empty of anything except the naked model.
A third set with a floor and a wall(the wall is different in this set, a brick facade), and the floor is different (a wood floor), but the set is empty of anything except the naked model.
1 set has a rectangular pad, that the model can sit on, stand on, lean on.
1 set has a chair, that she can sit on or lean on or ignore the chair.
The 5 sets seem to have been shot in a hurry, with the model told to assume different poses in a minimal setting, with little or no thought to artistic expression or showmanship or anything: just minimal photos of a lovely young girl, but interest fades slowly or quickly, when you realize that's all there is. Which is a wasted opportunity of this model. She deserves better.
Looking at the photosets at Hegre, I realize, anew, that I appreciate my Metart photosets so much better. Metart presents lovely women in a variety of interesting, softcore poses. I can spend hours looking at some Metart sets, while I quickly get bored looking at a Hegre photoset (even if the Hegre model is just as lovely as the Metart model). There's more variety in the Metart photos compared to the Hegre photos.
And I begin to realize why it's been years since I re-joined the Hegre site:
Out of four leading softcore glamour sites (Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy, Hegre), I rank Hegre at the bottom. All 4 sites have a collection of lovely young models. But the Hegre photosets are the least interesting of the 4 sites. That's my personal opinion, of course. But I've been a member of all 4 sites many times, and I've seen most of their photosets, and the only site I've joined with a lifetime membership is Metart, of those 4 sites (I have a lifetime membership to Sexart and The Life Erotic, part of the Metart network, but Metart is the only one of those 3 sites that I visit regularly.)
-Download options for a photoset at Hegre are:
(sample size for a photoset of 56 photos):
Mega Size Edition | 14000px, 182 MB
Super Size Edition | 10000px, 155 MB
Large Size Edition | 6000px, 39 MB
Collectors Edition | 3000px, 12 MB
Quick View Edition | 1200px, 2.8 MB
-Download options for a movie are:
Downloads
4K Ultra HD 2160p video | 3840x2160, 1.9 GB
Full HD 1080p video | 1920x1080, 969 MB
HD 720p video | 1280x720, 395 MB
SD 480p video | 848x480, 256 MB
SD 360p video | 640x360, 144 MB
SD 240p video | 416x240, 93 MB
The photography at Hegre is wonderfully crisp and clear, and the site has the best software for examining the photos in detail or in a slideshow.
Most photosets feature a model who is completely nude from start to finish.
And the set for the model is on is minimal: you have a model, and an empty room.
Or maybe there is a chair in the room.
Or maybe there is a mattress in the room.
That's it.
Is it lack of imagination, or striving for minimalism?
I imagine a photoshoot can be done quickly, because you tell the model to assume different poses, and shoot her quickly.
My reaction is to quickly lose interest, no matter how lovely or attractive the model can be.
I find the content at Metart, MPL Studios, and Femjoy is far more interesting and worthwhile viewing.
They are constantly adding new models to their catalog.
Almost all models are slender, white European teens (or early 20s).
The site has videos. The videos feature female masturbation, lesbian, some videos with a guy getting a hand massage on his penis.
Newer videos have 480p, 720p, 1080p, and 4K definition available.
CONTINUED IN THE FIRST REPLY BELOW:
I would keep trying to have a lifetime membership renewed.
If you paid for the membership, unless there was a legal reason for the membership to expire (such as bankruptcy or change of ownership), a lifetime membership should continue until the death of the paying member, or the life of the site.
And just because the site changed its name is not sufficient cause to cancel a lifetime membership.
Maybe you could contact PU staff to explain your problem, and they might be able to help.
I know in the past that the PU staff has helped solve PU member problems with sites, whether the PU member joined a site through a PU link or not.
If you're not sure "how to contact the PU staff, start a thread and explain your problem, and ask for help from the PU staff.
Label the thread: "Hegre lifetime membership expired" the same as your comment.
PU staff has much more weight when dealing with sites than an individual member.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They recently did an update for the homepage of LetsDoeIt network.
(Her Limit is part of the LetsDoeIt network).
The homepage now shows:
Latest Releases
Popular this week
Recently active pornstars
Browse LetsDoeIt top categories
Special Partner Deals(Which is a listing of ads for other porn sites)
-Since Her Limit is a channel in the Lets Doe It network, you get access to all 18 channels in the network.
-You have unlimited streaming for videos.
-You have unlimited downloads for photosets.
However, the photosets are not worth collecting, in my opinion.
A photoset of a video has around 10-12 photos. Which seems strange. Many of these models are cute or even gorgeous. They certainly deserve a full-sized photoset.
The photoset downloads in a zip file with only one definition, and with a generic file name, such as "6227d0474fa1b.zip".
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-You have a choice for downloading a video: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
There is no 4K option. Which seems strange for the network that started out as a glamour network. I mean, even hardcore porn sites are now mainly offering 4K. Don't misunderstand: this network was hardcore from the start, but what I mean is that even low-quality porn sites, as well as high quality porn site, are offering 4K. So why isn't this network offering it? You're supposed to keep up with the competition, unless something is wrong.
CONS(START OF):
-When you log in to the site, you get a page full of ads, before you get to the member's area.
The ads are for competing sites.
The ads don't immediately show you the join price.
You have to click on the ad for any site, to see what the join price is.
Note: it might be might my slow wifi connection that does not allow the prices to be shown.
After a few minutes, a few of the ads do show a reduced membership price.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
So you're wasting a lot of time, if you want to check out these ads.
-The ads have a "limited time offer" banner for each ad. Creating a false sense of urgency.
Get real. Or get smart. How many lies do you want to swallow, after you paid for a membership, before you're allowed to get to the content you paid for?
-The ads will give you a slightly discounted membership price from the "listed" price. But you can find much better discounts if you wait for holiday specials and seach a little.
-You click past the full-page-of-ads to get to the membership pages:
And the each membership page has ads at the bottom of the page.
Plus, you also get a large pop-up window that is another ad for a "LIMITED TIME OFFER" to another site.
Did I pay for a membership to a porn site?
Or did I really pay for a membership where I can browse ads for other porn sites?
-Pre-paid cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-The model page is very limited. It has a thumbnail of the model, plus links to her videos at the network. The bio section lists her name, birthdate, nationality, body type, boob size, ass size.
And that's it.
-There's a download limit of 100 videos per month, for the entire network. Any download from any one of the chanels counts towards the limit. Which is very restrictive.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site theme: extreme sex.
The models are usually attractive.
The sex often features anal penetration.
The man is the aggressor, grabbing the bitch's hair, shoving his dick down her throad, ramming his dick into her pussy and ass. And she moans and screams with passion, because he's such a brute.
Women like to be spanked. It's in their DNA. And these men are masters of the universe, who know exactly how to treat women.
The chanel has 186 scenes. Watch them all, and you, too, will learn to dominate women in your bedroom, or even in public, as long as you're wearing your Captain Universe Cape and Power Ring. Don't wear the cape and ring, and you might get arrested for indecent behavior.
You can like or dislike the scenes, save them as favorites.
Unlimited streaming.
But downloads are limited to 100 per month for the entire network.
Which seems restricted.
The channel updates with 1 new video every 1 or 2 weeks. Which is slow.
Because of the 100 video per month limit download for the network, and the slow update rate, I would advise against a long term membership. Basically, you're wasting your money. At one time I really enjoyed the network. But the update rate has slowed in the last couple of years, and they've imposed the limit for video downloads per month to 100. And they don't offer 4K definition.
Truthfully, I don't use 4K, because my equipment can't use it.
But it just seems like the network is not moving to a competitive position with regards to what other porn sites are offering.
So I think the channel (and the network) is not worth a long term join.
If you're really into extreme sex, I think there are sites that will give you more value for your money.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Her Limit is part of the LetsDoeIt network (in late 2018 PornDoePremium changed its name to LetsDoeIt).
LetsDoeIt is mainly a glamcore network of European models.
-Her Limit is different from the rest of the network sites, which mainly feature glamcore/heartcore with European models. Her Limit features attractive European models in rough sex. This is a pro and a con, depending on your personal tastes. Personally, I find the glamcore/heartcore niche more enjoyable than BDSM.
-Although this is consensual sex, and the intro portion shows the model smiling and happy to perform, once the sex begins, it turns rough quickly.
-As part of the LetsDoeIt network, the site features high production values: lovely models, nice sets, excellent lighting and sound control.
-You get access to over 40 different channels. There are no premium channels requiring extra payment.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Small site. Only 82 videos
-Many of the scenes are shot with 2 main stunt cocks: Mike Angelo or Mike Chapman. It gets boring for me to see these guys slapping and abusing the good-looking models, but that's just me: if you are into bdsm, maybe you can cheer or get excited by the way the stunt cocks use rough sex on the models.
-Site updates with 1 video and photoset per week. But the network updates every other day.
Bottom Line:
Site theme is rough sex.
Shows how powerful men can be: dominating the lovely bitches with their proud cock, shoving into the model's mouth until she gags, slapping her like the bitch deserves, pounding her pussy and asshole until she begs for mercy, with her whimpering and moans.
Choking the model by her throat.
Spitting on the model.
You get the idea.
The site is for men who want to be real men, unlike the pussy-men you find at most sites that strive to please the woman with soft, gentle sex.
Pierre Woodman would probably be a good stunt cock for some of these videos.
Since he seems to get off on rough sex and abusing women.
Hard to figure what kind of score to give the site.
If you're into rough sex, this would be a wonderful site, deserving a score in the 90s.
Even if you're not into rough sex, since you get access to the rest of the network, which includes The White Boxxx, one of the finest glamcore sites in the internet, the network deserves a score in the 90s, as well.
So I'm giving the site a score of 92.
I'm glad it went through so quickly.
And that you explained how you got the money.
I couldn't figure out how you would get the cash or credit, since I didn't include your name in the instructions, only your email address.
There can a small charge for sending cash/credit through PayPal, depending on how you do it.
If you want to send actual cash for pickup, there was a charge of around $5.50 or so.
But to send credit, unless you knows the bank account number or something, which I don't want or need to know, there was a charge of $1.50.
Thanks for checking.
Consider the $1.50 my personal gift to you.
The $50 came from PU, for your contributions to the site.
LOL.
Wraith,
I got your email at my Yahoo email address.
But the PU internal email system is unreliable.
I never got any of your emails from the PU system.
And you never got my email from the PU system.
Maybe PU will fix their email system one day.
In the past, I've send emails through the PU system, but most people never got those emails.
And there was no automatic notice the emails were lost, and never delivered.
Most email systems will notify you if an email was not delivered.
But not the PU email system.
Wraith,
I sent $50 at 5.13 pm PST today, 7-15-21.
Turns out you don't need a person's name.
All you need is an email address.
Not sure how this works, how you will get the money.
Let me know if there are any problems.
Because I figure they are going to charge me for the transfer, so what the heck.
If nothing else, it was worth it to see how this works.
Do you receive a check that you can deposit?
I don't see how you can get cash, from an email address.
But maybe there's a way.
But maybe I can figure out a way to send an Amazon gift card, in the future.
Whatever.
Send me your name and email address and I will send you $50 through PayPal.
I won the $300 prize yesterday, and want to share the wealth, in a small way.
Consider this an early Christmas present from the PU site.
No risk, no obligation.
Since the PU internal email service is so glitchy, send me the email to:
fakesharen009 (the at sign) yahoo.com.
Name and email address are required when sending cash through PayPal.
If you don't want the cash, just reply to this post, by saying: No thanks, not interested.
Looks like a nice site.
Sorry to keep harping on price, but membership is not cheap.
You would think that with old content deleted from sites, they would give you a bargain rate.
But I guess they think that if you want to view or collect this older content, you are willing to pay full price.
Mainly, I try to get full value for the dollars I spend.
So I will pass on this site, even though there are some videos I would like to see.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-This is not a pro. But you should join the network through the TMW (Teen Mega World) site, instead of one of the network satellite sites.
If you join directly through the TMW site itself, the search engine searches the entire network for the content of a model.
If you join through one of the satellite sites, your search is often limited to the site you joined through, instead of searching the entire network. So finding the content of a model is difficult and time-consuming, because you would have to search all 35 sites in the network if you joined through one of the satellite sites. And those searches would be basically worthless, since you would probably only get the model's content at the site you joined through.
-This is not a pro. but it's worth mentioning: This is the first site/network that has a non-secure version and a secure version. Seems like a waste of space, they should delete the non-secure version, which your browser will notify you is open to hacking.
Cons:
PROS(START OF):
-Site is part of the TMW network (Teen Mega World), which has 35 sites (counting TMW as one of the sites).
-Membership in any one of the network sites gives you access to all the sites. There are no premium sites that cost extra to access.
-Network covers most teen niches: boy-girl, boy-2 girls, lesbian, creampie, anal, 4K site, VR site, massage, squirting, etc.
-A list of the sites you get access to is shown in the reply section to this review.
-Each video has a matching photoset.
-Videos have a choice of downloading of 270p, 480p, 720p definition.
CONS(START OF):
-The search is flawed if you join through one of the satellite sites instead of the main TMW site.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
If you join directly one of the other network sites, your search will be limited to the site you joined through, instead of the entire network. The search will probably still be limited to your join site, even when you log in to one of the other network sites. I say probably, because the search results seem hit-or-miss when you use the search engine, depending on random factors.
-This is an archive site. The last update was in September 2009.
-Small site: 73 videos.
-The videos are poor quality: They were shot when the network was a low-rent teen hardcore site, where the video equipment was basic, the settings were cheap apartment rooms, the furniture was cheap.
-The videos have to be downloaded. You can't stream them online.
-No zip file for the photosets. So you would have to manually download each photo. Since the last photoset was posted in 2009, the quality of the photosets is low, and the photosets are not worth collecting, even when the girl is cute.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Vendo, a proprietary biller. I prefer CCBill or Epoch, which are easy to cancel, but I've used Vendo many times, and never had a problem.
-Login details (username and password) are randomly generated characters, instead of a name and password you choose yourself.
BOTTOM LINE:
Site theme: girls masturbating with toys: the toys can include dildos, with and without batteries, or bottles, or fruits or vegetables, fingers.
This site is one of the poorer sites in the network.
The site was started in late 2008, and the last update was less than a year later, in September 2009.
So the videos and photosets are old, made when the network was basically a low-rent collection of cheaply made hardcore teen videos. No effort has been made to update the site to make it user-friendly.
Most sites in the network offer a choice of streaming or downloading.
This site does not offer streaming: you have to download each video and play it on your computer software program.
There is a matching photoset for each video, but there is no zip file. So you would have to manually download each individual photo. Except since the photos are show the models in cheap settings (cheap apartment room, cheap furniture, inexpensive street clothes), and no effort is made to make the girls appear attractive, the photos are not worth collecting.
Does the site have any value?
There is curiosity value: the site is an example of when the network was a low-rent collection of cheaply made hardcore teen videos.
Also, it shows, because there is no streaming option, and no zip file for the photosets, how the network in general has vastly improved over the years with easier navigation choices, improved-quality videos and photosets.
And, if you join this site directly, you will realize how messed up the search engine can be, because your search will probably be limited to the contents of this specific site, instead of a search that covers the entire network. So finding and accessing the content of each model would be a nightmare, because: 1. you wouldn't be able to find most of the models content at the network; 2. you would have a hell of a time accessing the model's content at other sites in the network, because you would have to log in to each individual site, and then scroll through the individual content pages to find the model's videos, before you could view it.
So do yourself a favor, and join through the main TMW site itself, where the search covers the entire network, and accessing the model's content is made easy.
Giving the site a score of 50, as a warning to PU users not to join this site directly, but to join the main TMW site.
The TMW network is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks, and I've joined it numerous times.
But the network did an upgrade a few years ago, which was a step backwards in the search and navigation of the network, if you joined one of the network satellite sites, instead of the main TMW site.
The customer service was kind enough to give me a free membership to the TMW site, because I'm paying for an annual membership to the Teen Sex Movs site. I need the TMW site access, because of the navigation problems the network update created.
And I'm locked in to the Teen Sex Movs membership, because I got such a low annual price membership.
(It would be nice if they switched my membership to the TMW site itself, with my low-membership price, but they didn't. So each year I write customer service, explaining that I have an annual membership to Teen Sex Movs site, which gives me access to the entire network, but I need a free membership to TMW to make using the network easier.)
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Lets Doe It network. So you get access to about 17 channels.
-All content is exclusive.
-Unlimited streaming. But there's a download limit of 100 videos for the entire network per month.
Which seems very limiting.
-Scenes are available in definitions from 240p through 1080p. Seems strange they don't offer 4K videos, especially for a quality glamour network.
-There is a link to skip the intro part of a scene. Useful after you've watched the same intro again and again.
Cons:
-The main con is the irregular update rate. The site updates with 1 or 2 or 3 scenes per month.
-Flash page of ads on logging in to the network.
-Poor site layout, which makes navigating the site harder. Instead of a simple interface, you have a poorly laid out network page which has thumbnails of latest releases, popular this week, recently active porn stars, and a line of ads. Plus a line of porn awards won. Who needs this shit? Keep it simple, only show what's really useful, to make navigation easy.
-I was using a VPN because it's supposed to make surfing the internet safer. But I got an email message stating the LetsDoeIt site was concerned my account had been hacked. It requested I send a verification code to the site, which I did. Many experts recommend using a VPN for security, but many sites have equipment to detect a VPN and either question your identity or dis-allow access to the site.
-Photo sets are tiny. From 10 to 15 photos per set.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Photo sets have only 1 size definition zip file, which has a computer-generated name. So if you do want to collect these photo sets, you have to manually re-name the file with the name of the model, site, posting date, video title.
-The videography is not the crystal clear imagery used for the glamour sites. Instead, you get some jerky editing, some video-taped images with lines super-imposed on the images to show it's a video recording of the girl entering the hostel, filters or lack of attention to the outside lighting when the scene is outdoors: the idea is to show you a "real-life" take on the girl's experience. Which grows old fast.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site has 63 scenes. Because you only get 1 to 3 new scenes per month, the site will grow slowly.
-The Lets Doe It network is primarily a glamour network. The White Boxxx, A Girl Knows, Xchimera are the primary sites that focus on glamour-styled porn. But the network tries to broaden its appeal by offering other niches, such as rough porn, travel porn, massage porn, etc.
The main strength of the network is selecting attractive looking models and then presenting them in a setting (nice sets, nice costumes, excellent technical features for lighting, sound control) that makes the models appear like glamorous movie stars instead of porn stars.
Horny Hostel site theme: A girl goes on a trip abroad, she checks into a hostel for a low-priced stay. There she meets a horny guy, and they fuck. Almost no build-up to the sex. European guys are all horny. And girls on vacation are also horny.
So this site is a step away from the glamour style.
Instead of glamour, this is supposed to be reality porn, or slice of life. The models do wear make-up, but it's minimal. The vibe is raw and slightly gritty. You've got girls on vacation, and either they start off showing their naked bodies--meaning their ready for sex--or they are innocents abroad who just happen to meet horny guys that set off erotic sparks in the girls, who turn out to be more than willing to fuck. No romance, just fucking.
But these girls are adult: they don't need romance or sweet talk before they start to have sex with a stranger they just met minutes ago. The guy is horny. The girl, is either horny to start with, or she is hiding that horniness under a calm exterior. And since this is porn, that reduces the need for dialog.
Actually, Bitches Abroad, a different channel in the Lets Doe It network, has a similar setup: Bitches Abroad has girls travelling to a different country, who hook up with a stranger and then have sex. But the videography is smoother, the plots make more sense, and the scenes are much more enjoyable. The models are more attractive, and they are presented more attractively. Which makes a big difference.
The imagery and esthetics of Bitches Abroad are refined compared to Horny Hostel's raunchy vibe.
Giving the site a score of 80. I don't care for the setup. I prefer a little build-up to the sex, or more meaning to the sex. Or some plot that makes sense, other than two horny strangers meeting and deciding to fuck.
Over 90% of the porn sites I've signed up with, and this is over 100 porn sites, have a pre-checked cross-sale.
I have found a few sites did not have a pre-checked cross-sale, but they were definitely the exception.
And when I found such a site, I spent extra time searching the join page, looking for the cross-sale that didn't exist.
That's been my experience, anyway, which is why I said that a pre-checked cross-sale is standard for porn sites.
But if you were lucky enough to find porn sites without a pre-checked cross-sale, I can easily understand why you would view them with a higher opinion.
There are many great porn sites out there. Many with a very inexpensive price, that makes them a bargain.
Which adds to the pleasure of a porn hobby.
But if you only found a small disagreement with my review, I consider that a compliment. :)
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The Horny Hostel site is called a channel in the Lets Doe It network.
I do not believe that there is a separate Horny Hostel site that exists apart from the Let's Doe It network.
-Membership in the Horny Hostel channel gives you access to the entire LetsDoeIt network: there are no premium channels you have to pay extra for. There are currently 17 channels in the network you get access to.
-PU has a discounted price of $19.95/month (recurring).
-Some of the ads for discounted memberships for other porn sites are worth considering.
-The Lets Doe It network content is exclusive.
-There is a "skip intro" hot link where you can skip the promo intro to each video.
-Choice of definition from 240p-1080p for streaming and download.
Cons:
-Small channel. Only 28 videos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-There is a 100 monthly download limit for the network. Since I don't download a lot, that doesn't bother me. But if you are into heavy collecting, the monthly limit might affect you. Because the network has over 100 videos that are worth saving, in my opinion.
Bottom Line:
A hostel used to be a low-priced accommodation where you could rent a bed in a dormitory. Sometimes that would also include a bathroom (usually shared), maybe a lounge and/or kitchen.
I've seen the Hostel movie, where hostels are used to torture and kill tourists.
The Horny Hostel is different: the channel features young girls who encounter studs who do all kinds of sex. Peeping toms, anal fucking, straight sex, whatever.
They present the videos as reality porn, where you are supposed to be watching the girl and guy meet and have instant sex, but the video includes some frames that supposed to show a video camera clicking away to record the action. The reality aspect and the video camera frames are wasted on me, since I don't believe this is reality video--and most reality shows are scripted, and are really fake-reality anyway.
The channel (Horny Hostel) and the network use a lot of European models and stunt cocks, so when they do speak, the accents give a bit of flavor to the dialogue.
Except that most of the dialogue is "Oooohhhhh, aaahhhhhhhh, yesssssssss, oooohh, ah-ah-ah-ah," anyway, which is easy to understand.
This is a small channel: only 28 videos. But the videos are high quality.
And you also get access to the entire Lets Doe It network.
I have access through a LetsDoeIt membership, and I see a notice at the Horny Hostel channel that says I have 100 downloads available. That means 100 downloads for the network, not 100 downloads for each channel.
The Best Porn states there are 15 sites included with membership in Horny Hostel.
But the correct number is 17 channels (Lets Doe It calls its sites channel instead of sites. I don't know if there is a difference between a site and channel.)
The videos at Horny Hostel and many of the other channels in the network are premium videos: many models that range from attractive to lovely or even beautiful. The sets are nice, not cheap. The technical factors are good to excellent: lighting, sound control, good camera-work (nicely focused, etc.).
My favorite channel is The White Boxxx, where they take lovely models and present them as gorgeous creatures who provide a glamcore approach to porn.
Even though Horny Hostel is a small channel of only 28 videos, it's a nice addition to the Lets Doe It network. Proving a different approach to porn. The White Boxxx presents a glamcore approach to porn, where the models are presented as gorgeous creatures who are showcased in beautiful sex. Horny Hostel is less glamorous, more gritty, where the sex is hard and fast, and less time is spent on any preliminaries of lovemaking: it's just sex and hard fucking, with a raw feel to it.
Thanks for the positive note.
Feeling much stronger, since I got out of the hospital.
So I've got the time and energy to review porn sites.
LOL.
Stay well, buddy.
PS: I think there are two sites that feature the same kind of POV shots as this site, at the Adult Time network.
Jay's POV and another site that's very similar, but I can't recall the title.
The main value of the videos is how cute the models are.
But that's my niche: cute teen models.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Simple setup. Most of the plots are older guy gets seduced by young girls.
-The site was added to the Nubile Films around late 2019, as a bonus site.
-PU offers a discounted price of $19.94/month.
-Login and member pages are secure.
-Videos are offered in 270p through 1080p.
-Videos have a short text description of the plot.
Cons:
-Although the site was a bonus site added to Nubile Films in late 2019, it stopped updating in January 2020.
-The site follows the same plots as Jays POV.
-The visuals of the video are usually clear, with nice colors. But the videos use a POV setup, and the camera can be slightly shaky. Jay should hire a professional videographer to shoot these videos.
Bottom Line:
Site theme is horny teens who fuck their step fathers or step brothers. So this is faux incest, where you're supposed to experience the excitement of watching taboo sex. The big plus is the girls are usually good-looking teens. A minor negative is the stunt cock is usually Jay, who can get irritating after watching him get seduced time after time. That ploy gets old fast. Would like to see some different stunt cocks, for a different take on the plot.
The site only has 67 videos. So it's a very small site. And the last update was in January 2020.
If you enjoy the videos, you can find simiilar videos at Jays POV (a channel at Adult Time).
The colors of the videos are clear and crisp, but the camera work can be jittery at times. This is POV.
As a free add-on to Nubile Films, it's worth checking the site out.
Two things impress me about the site.
I'm not a fan of POV. I prefer traditional camera-work that gives you a more stable, comprehensive view of the action.
However, some of the girls are really cute. And POV can make it seem like you're watching the action right on top of the girl. It's inches away from that lovely feminine flesh. Boobs, pussy, ass.
And as many of these videos keep reminding you, it's not really sex between blood relatives. It's only sex between step-relatives. So it's not real incest, but faux incest.
Giving the site a score of 79.
The main cons are:
-It's an archive site. No updates since January 2020.
-It's a small site. Only 67 videos.
REVIEW(CONTINUED):
Riding her therapist's dick with her full tits bouncing gets Britney moaning and gasping with delight, but she's not fully satisfied quite yet. That pinnacle of delight doesn't come until Britney is bent over her chair getting her fuck hole pounded from behind while she dreams of her stepdad. After briefly sucking her therapist's dick one last time, Britney lets him fuck her until he cums all over her belly just like she wishes her stepdaddy would do."
The model/actor playing the therapist is a poor actor. No one bothered to write a script for him to act. You can tell he's just making up words to tell Brittany Light. I've met salesmen who could lie and throw the bull shit convincingly, but this guy is not smooth or convincing.
Britney Light is much more convincing as a pretty young teen with the problem that she is attracted to her stepfather. And she is so cute, with such a soft sweet voice, all you want to do is comfort with a gentle fuck and maybe a harder fuck if she starts to moan and groan a lot.
You can tell I am enjoying this site far more than the That Sitcom Show site, which is the other bonus site you get when joining Nubiles Film.
For one thing, these models are more attractive.
For another, the plots are less intrusive.
You can focus on what you'd like to do to these girls easier.
I had no connection with That Sitcom Show site. I didn't think it was erotic. I didn't enjoy the parodies.
But looking at the models at Hot Crazy Mess, I felt like a dirty old man again. Better yet, a dirty young man. The teen models are so cute,
your mind feels like it's 18 years old again. With all the urges.
REVIEW(CONTINUED):
Cons:
-Archive site. Last video posted 2020-01-03. That is the main con, they won't be updating this site.
The site score of 88 is because I really like the videos at this site. The girls are attractive, they seem like sweet young women, not porn sluts. Maybe that's narrow-minded of me. I don't hold being in porn against the models, but I like and am more comfortable with the idea or fantasy of a sweet young thing having sex, instead of a porn slut having sex.
And these girls are really attractive. I mean fucking attractive. Physically. And mentally (the image of a sweet young thing, instead of a porn star slut).
And the plot, although it's meant to act as the setup for the sex, does not get in the way too much: you can focus on the attractive girl, and the sex that is going to happen.
And the female models do a good job acting their roles. Better than the stunt cocks, who seem like lame actors in comparison to how well the female models act.
Or maybe I'm looking at the female models and thinking what I'd like to do to them, and that increases their acting ability, because their actions are less jarring than the stunt cock actions and voices.
The female models project the image of sweet young things.
They could have hired better stunt cocks, who had better acting ability.
But the focus is on the models instead of the stunt cocks.
Which is as it should be.
I really enjoy this site. Think it makes a nice addition to the Nubile Films site as a bonus.
Compared to ThatSitComShow site, which is boring bonus.
Description of a sample video:
"Deviant Thoughts - S2:E1"
"Britney Light is seeing a therapist for her deviant thoughts regarding her stepdad. She selected this therapist because his methods are unconventional, but they work. The therapist starts by having Britney close her eyes to visualize the most sexually exciting scenario with her stepdad that she can and then describe it. Then he tells her to take off her panties and imagine the scenario playing out as she masturbates. While the therapist describes the salacious situation, he can't help but whip out his stiffie and start stroking it because he finds Britney and her fantasies so hot.
The next step in Britney's therapy is to substitute her therapist for her stepdad. He lets her know that his cock is now her stepdad's cock so she can use it to play out her fantasies. Although Britney is a little hesitant at first, she agrees to start sucking. Soon she's lost in her own desire as she gobbles that cock and then climbs on top to take it all the way into her dripping pussy.
CONTINUED IN NEXT REPLY:
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-I want to thank Wraith0711 for posting a comment that Nubile Films now includes 2 bonus sites:
That Sitcom Show and Hot Crazy Mess.
He's one of those detailed-people who examine a site to see what it has to offer.
I wasn't aware that the bonus sites were added, until he posted the comment.
-I should also thank exotics4me for pointing out that the 2 bonus sites added to Nubile Films were probably added around 2-3 months ago.
-PU discount of $14.98 for the first month, recurring at $29.98/month.
But there is a yearly price of $99.95.
However, if you join through Nubile Films, they have a current discount of $84/year. Nubile Films also has a current discount of $14.98 for the first month, recurring at $19.94/month.
So join through Nubile Films, and save a few dollars, if you're going to be around for more than 1 month.
-Login and member pages are https.
-The models are mainly slender white teens, with some black and latina models. There is even at least one Asian model (Lulu Chu).
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
They don't list the nationality of the models. The models are mainly cute to very attractive. A lot of young honey bunnies that are fucking hot.
-These girls are cute to really cute. Lily Rader, Audrey Grace, Alex Blake, Piper June, Riley Star, Britney Light, Dolly Leigh are just a few of the young teens that grace these videos.
-Videos have a plot to set up the sex. But not a lot of thought is really put into the plot. It's really thin. And the models are not really actors. Except some of the models are so cute it doesn't matter: either they are better actors than I thought, or they are so attractive you're looking at their face and body so hard you're not paying much attention to what they're saying.
-The screenshots download in a zip.
-There is a good description of the plot/action for each video.
-You can tag videos with a favorite label, and save them in a favorites group.
-A lot of the models are petite, around 5' or so. That just adds to their cuteness.
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-Small site. 67 videos total. Plus matching photosets for each video.
-Last update was 2020-01-03.
That's a shame, because some of these girls are really cute, and I would love to see even more cute girls added. That's probably the biggest con of the site, no more updates.
-The camera is poor POV. The guy holding the camera does not hold it steady, it can move around, which is distracting and irritating.
They should have hired a professional shoot the video. It would have made a nice improvement.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Very little model information. Age, height, country. figure measurements, that's it.
-The video plot descriptions are very detailed, which is good. But reading the descriptions, you start to see the same plot points being repeated. They run out of fresh ideas, and just use the same stories. But since the girls are so cute, you can more or less ignore the plots, and feast on the girls, who can be sweet and sexy and hot as hell.
-Sometimes when they shoot outdoors, the random noise level can be quite high.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
-Last video posted 2020-01-03.
-67 videos.
-67 matching photosets.
-Video runtime 20 to 30 minutes.
-Videos can be downloaded in definitions from 270 through 1080p.
-Photosets run around 35 photos per set.
-Each photo is 1920x1080px.
They indicate the photos are screen shots, but they are good quality. I assume there is some excellent software that converts a video into a photoset, because the quality of each screenshot is far superior to what the screenshots were from 10 or 15 years ago.
I examine the photos in a photoset, and I couldn't tell they were screenshots. Most of the photos were very nice. I wish a some of the photos per set were slightly more focused, better definition, because some of these girls are really cute, but many of the screenshots look like real photos. And the screenshots are focused on the action, centered, not just random screenshots that have heads or parts of the body randomly cut off out of the photo.
The photosets are worth keeping.
Maybe I'm just tired at looking at the MetArt and other high quality glamour site photosets, but I am getting slightly bored with many of their recent models. Perhaps it's just me. But the girls at this Hot Crazy Mess site were much more appealing, that I even liked their photosets more than what I like at MetArt. Two different types of content: MetArt is mainly young women, late teens or twenties. Strictly softcore. Glamour-style photos. The girls at Hot Crazy Mess at mainly cute teens doing hardcore sex.
The Hot Crazy Mess models are more desirable than the models at MetArt because they generate more heat.
Britney Light, in the video, "Deviant Thoughts - S2:E1", is a cute young teen. 19 years old. Extremely cute. Soft, tender voice. She's so fuckable. Not an elegant way of putting it, but it's the God damn truth. At least in this video, she is hot and wet and luscious. Not like a porn star, but like a sweet young thing you'd like to pound on for a few hours. If you had the strength and endurance.
Porn is fantasy, but that's what this model makes me think. And quite a few other models at this site.
Whereas, many of the models at MetArt, although absolutely gorgeous, have lately left me cold. Maybe I need to take a break from porn, but the girls at Hot Crazy Mess are really attractive, which I appreciate. That I can find something to like a lot.
Kyler Quinn, in a video at the site titled: "Fuck Thy Neighbor - S5:E6", comes across as a sweet young teen (her age is listed as 20) who broke up with her boyfriend who was cheating on her. So she meets a new neighbor and has sex with him as a rebound fuck.
I don't know what it is: the vibes from these videos are like these are sweet young things, who are having problems, and they are using sex to help with the pain. They are sweet, innocent, not sluts, not porn stars (fantasy, again, remember), who just want to share a moment in time with another human being.
I just enjoy the videos a lot. It's a different vibe, a different atmosphere from glamour or heartcore or gonzo, but a reality-based slice of life where the sweet young thing has a problem, and she is having sex to reduce her pain.
I don't know why, but the videos just appeal to me.
(The models are attractive young women, and the videos are well shot--apart from the sometimes jerky POV camera-work.)
Ella Cruz is another adorable teen model.
I mean, this site has a bunch of lovely teen models, that are just fascinating to watch.
I'm giving the site a score of 88.
Pros:
-Fine looking, attractive young models. Could be girl next door types, except they are attractive to very attractive. Not porn sluts.
-Excellent video quality, except for the sometimes jerky POV camera-work.
-Nice sets. But when they shoot outdoors, the noise level can be quite high.
REVIEW CONTINUED IN FIRST REPLY:
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network. A large network with over 7500 scenes.
-Large site. 506 videos.
-One-year membership is only $60. Low price for a quality site and network.
-Navigation is easy. Can switch between network sites easily, without needing to re-login.
-Nice search engine. You can search within a site, or within the network. Search by model's name, etc.
-You can add videos to your favorite list.
-Can comment on each video.
Cons:
-I think the cons are basically minor. This is a nice site, a nice network.
-You have 506 videos. Most of the videos are sex videos. But some (a minor percentage) are interviews of the models. Some members might think the model interviews are boring. But I thought it was a chance to see the models talk a bit about themselves. The models answer questions about how they got into porn, how long they've been in porn, a tiny bit about themselves. Many of the models state they've only been in porn for less than one year.
-The site theme seems dated. Maybe I'm jaded, but the story-line of a woman having sex with someone not her husband does not add a lot of excitement to the plot.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Most videos don't have many comments by members. And the comments I've read are mostly not worth reading.
Bottom Line:
HotwifeXXX features wives who get off on sex outside of their marriage. Who believes that in today's world, if you get married, your partner won't cheat on you?
Maybe I've been watching too much porn to believe that sex outside of marriage will send you straight to hell.
But these videos show women women having sex with strangers. The sex can be with a guy or a girl. So girl-girl sex could be an extra thrill. I mean, if you have sex outside of marriage, according to the bible, you could be stoned to death. And if a married woman has sex with a woman, that's double grounds for stoning to death.
The videos often portray the husband allowing his wife to have sex with someone else. I guess that not only does the wife get a thrill from illicit sex, but the husband also gets a thrill from knowing his wife enjoys sex with other people.
This site teaches you that people have many perversions.
So joining the site will broaden your mind.
There is a photoset that accompanies each sex video (but not the interview videos).
The photoset has about 151 photos.
The photos are good quality (not low-quality screenshots).
So if you like the model and the sex video, you can collect the photosets.
The photoset zip file downloads with the name of the model, but you need to manually add the title of the video, the date posted, and the site.
The zip file comes in only one definition, which is large.
Photos are 5760x3840.
Each photo is around 5 MB.
With around 151 photos per set, the average photoset takes up 768 MB, which is a lot of space.
So I recommend only keeping the sets you really enjoy.
Video runtime for the sex videos run 20 to 40 minutes.
Each video comes with a short text file that is supposed to tell you the plot.
I don't think the writers that are supposed to summarize the plot bother to watch the videos.
The writer knows that a girl is supposed to have sex, so he makes up a story about a girl having sex. The story doesn't match the video's plot.
The written text file story often has details that aren't shown or told in the voice-over that plays with the video.
So the short text file summary is worthless.
The sex videos are well videotaped, nice colors, nice settings, the models are usually very attractive, but the writers that are supposed to summarize the video plot make up their own stories, instead of watching the videos.
I guess they are bored with porn, and don't want to spend the time it takes to watch these videos.
The staff that run the site should check that the text stories match the plot of the video.
It should be very easy for the text writers to read the script of the video, and make a summary.
Based on the quality of the videos, which have excellent technical features (good settings, nice colors for the film, attractive models), and the choices for downloading or streaming the videos, plus the low membership cost ($60/year), I highly recommend the site and the network.
Sir, was there some reason your reviews were deleted and you only got 1 entry in yesterday's raffle?
I was surprised, and thought you deserved credit for 2 reviews.
I see that your reviews are now re-posted with today's date.
But those reviews were originally posted around June 20, and should have been eligible for yesterday's raffle.
Call me finicky about small details.
LOL.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
