I just signed up for a membership this morning with 18videoz.
I haven't explored the network yet, but it's supposed to have multiple sites.
One of the sites is Sell Your GF.
The login to the network is non-secure.
Sound familiar yet?
My login details were computer generated.
Also, I had to enter my email address, when joining, on a non-secure page.
Anyway, if you still have time with your sub, you might try exploring the sites you have access to.
I don't really have a handle on your tastes, but I joined 18videoz because there are several teen sites that might be good.
I suggest trying to explore the sites you have access to, I don't know how the managers/owners slice and dice the sites you have access to with different memberships.
But you might find there are a lot of videos that you are not aware of, that you might enjoy.
I can't be more specific than that, because I don't know what specific sites you have access to.
And I'm not really sure how my membership works yet, I just signed up this morning.
If I hit the obstacles you hit, with the need to upgrade my membership, I will ask for a refund.
I paid $59.95 for a 1 year membership, that is supposed to give me access to at least 9 separate sites. I saw that joining for the same access sites costs $119.95 if I joined through a different site.
Sometimes it can make a world of difference, how you join a site or network.
But overcome your bitterness, and try to get your money's worth from the sites, since you've already paid for them. Easier said than done, because I've joined sites, and got so pissed off, that I never used them after they gave me problems.
I would only join that site or that porn network for a heavily discounted price.
That's just me.
I think there are sites that offer more value for your porn dollars.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU lists the membership price at $59.95/month, with a PU discount of $39.99/month recurring.
Or a 1 year membership for $119.88.
I found a holiday discount of $59.95 for the first year. So if you want to join the network, or one of its sites, I suggest waiting for a holiday discount, since it's so much cheaper.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-The network includes about 20 different sites. The most famous one is JamesDeen.com, because James Deen has made a name for himself as a porn star.
-There is a large amount of hardcore videos at the network. Some videos available in 4K, most are available in 1080p and lower definitions.
-Content is exclusive.
-If cookies are enabled, you don't have to enter your login details, you are automatically entered into the site once you click on the "login" link.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Easy to use slide-show program for viewing photosets.
-Photosets have 2 choices of definition for a zip file: 1024p and 1600p.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Photoset default filename includes the model's name, title of the set, and file definition.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Sometimes your login details fail to work. You have to try to get new login details, or play around with your old login details hoping it will get you into the network.
-Rocketgate is the default biller. I think CCBill or Famesupport are easier to deal with.
-I don't believe I got a confirming email on my membership. Which creates problems. Especially if the site does not recognize your login details. Rocketgate, the default biller, does not seem very responsive about confirming your membership, even though they were the biller I used to join, and I sent them my name, email address, the last four digits of my credit card I used to join, and the amount and date of my join.
-The photosets are shot by a professional photographer: so the photos are real photos and not screencaps.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
The photos are well lit. But the photos fail to emphasize the physical beauty of the models (even when some of the models are naturally attractive). Riley Reid is attractive, but her photosets present her as a plain-looking girl. Chloe Cherry comes across a litte better. Chloe can be a fine-looking model, but I don't want to save any of her photosets: I want a model to be attractive, or seductive, or somebody I can fantasize about fucking. But the photosets of Chloe are not appealing. I'd rather look at photos of the meat hanging in a butcher's shop, which, while not sexual, can be interesting because I know the meat can be transformed into a delicious meal. Looking at Chloe's photos, I get turned off by her skin tones, by how un-attractive she appears.
And that's for the good looking models, who are in the minority of models.
The majority of the site models are plain to unattractive.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The network gives you access to about 20 different porn sites. The most famous site is JamesDeen.com, because he's made a name for himself as a porn star. There's some controvery about James Deen: he's been accused of abuse by some of his sex partners. Deen claims he's innocent and can't understand why women would complain about his rough treatment of them during sex. He's just a simple, innocent guy who enjoys slapping women, spitting on them, twisting their arms to make them moan, and showing sluts that he's the master who controls these cunts with his powerful cock. And he smiles a lot, which shows he's just a good old boy from Pasadena, California.
The network features rough sex. A lot of anal sex. The models are usually called sluts, and treated as pieces of meat. Women are to be used and abused, because men are dominant creatures.
The models are sluts: So you get lots of tattoos and implants.
Even the cute models come across as trailer trash whores.
I enjoy softcore and hardcore. But this network doesn't appeal to me. Rocco Siffredi and Devils Film, two competing sites, are much more interesting and enjoyable. For one thing, Rocco Siffredi and Devils Film features more attractive models. Some of the sex scenes at Rocco and Devils Film can be intriguing. And hot.
Whereas the full porn network scenes focus on rough sex, anal sex, treating the women like pieces of meat.
There is a channel called "Sex Games". It appears to be an adult animation channel, where you can play with cartoon figures and fap (masturbate).
Edit: My mistake. The "Sex Games" link, although placed at the top of the page as a normal channel, is actually a separate site, and not part of the Full Porn Network.
The reason I'm leaving it in this review is the "Sex Games" site appears to be very impressive.
A lot of thought and skilled technical knowledge went into making the site.
Joining that site is free.
I recommend checking it out.
Although free porn sites are not reviewed at the PU site, the free site seems intriguing.
I wish there were more hours in a day, because the questions they ask of your thoughts and desires, and the quality of the cartoon images, is just amazing at dirtyfapgame. I haven't joined the site yet, but I hope to join soon.
Getting back to Full Porn Network:
This is personal taste, but the vibe of the network does not appeal to me:
I want young girls who look attractive, and seem to enjoy sex.
The theme of the network is rough sex, anal sex, treating girls and women as sluts who should be abused, because men are dominant creatures, and girls are happiest when you spit on them, force them into painful and uncomfortable positions, slap them around, all in the nature of treating women as they secretly desire.
So if you fantasize about rough sex, anal sex, then the network might be appealing.
Especially if you can get a holiday special for around $60 for the first year.
Otherwise, the PU discounts are OK, but way too high for my budget.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Adult Time network. Which means you get a massive amount of quality porn with your membership.
-Customer support from FameSupport, which has a live chat line that is answered almost immediately. Support is 24/7, for live chat, email and telephone. Probably the best online support I've ever had, because of the live chat option.
-Videos are available for download and streaming from 160p thru 2160p.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads. There is a daily download limit of 300 GB, which seems like a huge amount of data to download.
-There is a photo set gallery for each video. The photo sets run around 35 photos per set, which seems small.
-Lola Fae, Chloe Foster, Jill Kassidy, Sophia Lux, Bunny Colby, Scarlett Sage, are just a few of the attractive models appearing at the site.
Cons:
-As part of the Adult Time network, you also get navigation problems: finding all the content at this site, or at other sites in the Adult Time network, can be a real headache.
-The photo sets download with a default numerical file name. So you have to rename them with the model's name, site, title, and posting date.
-The photo sets are OK photos: could be much better quality, especially when the models are cute. They are better than some screen caps, but you wouldn't collect them for presenting the models attractively, even when the models are naturally attractive.
-The videos often have a plot leading up to the sex. But that just shows how poor some of the models are in acting. However, I forgive them for poor acting ability, especially when the models are cute.
Bottom Line:
There are plenty of lesbian sites online.
I think Girlfriends Films is a good lesbian site. Not great, but good.
You have some very attractive young models.
You have a mix of young and old lesbians, with different body types.
They add a plot to create greater meaning for the sex, but the plots don't mean much.
Add weak plots with weaker acting skills, and like most porn, you have to turn off your brain to enjoy these videos. There are some sites that have interesting story lines, and the models and stunt cocks do a decent to good acting job, but these are in the minority. Pure Taboo comes to mind, and Viv Thomas has some very fine scenes. But Pure Taboo and Viv Thomas are premium porn sites, watching their videos is like watching a cinematic movie.
Giving GirlFriends Films a score of 85. If you're into lesbian porn, the Adult Time network has several channels that fit the bill, plus other channels that have some lesbian porn.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Content is exclusive.
-The site (and network) is laid out to make navigation simple. You can easily find the video content of the site
-No site timeout that I can find. You can leave the site inactive for hours, and will still be logged in. Perfect for guys who forget what they are logged into (Joke. PU members are self-aware, and watch their porn closely.)
-In the last year, they added secure login to the site/network. In the last month, they made the member pages secure (https).
-The videos were shot in the US, so the models speak English. Which helps to show how these macho studs enjoy humiliating these girls.
Cons:
-Do not join the site through the site itself. You will be paying a high price.
$29.95/month, or $50 for 3 months.
Join through the 18Videoz site, where the fee is $60/year. Or $15/month.
The 18Videoz membership includes The Girls Next Door Abused site, plus access to 17 more sites.
-The main con is this is an archive site. The site stopped updating in 2012 or earlier.
A PU member in 2008 reported that the site had stopped updating, but was changing the content posting dates to give the impression that content was newly added.
-Ads on every page.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-They need to do an update of the public page advertising the site.
The photos/thumbnails are washed out images, with poor colors, images that are not clear and crisp.
The public page is the first thing a person sees when looking at the site.
They need to sell the site, not show an old tired page that has been out of date for many years.
Bottom Line:
Because this is an archive site, with old content, the videos and screenshots are low quality. The photography is poor, the lighting is poor, the colors are poor, the sets are cheap, the definition is low compared to what most porn sites offer.
The only value this site offers is a reminder of the early days of porn. And what producers could get away with.
The site theme is treating girls like trash: get your rocks off with these girls, lie to them, humiliate them, and show them what a macho stud you are before pushing them out the door.
Site contents: 48 videos.
Runtime is 20 to 33 minutes.
There is a montage of screenshots for each video, but no way to view the individual screenshots online, or to download the screenshot set. The hot link for online viewing of the screenshots has disappeared, and the hot link for downloading a zip file for the screenshots has disappeared. And tech support pays no attention to such minor defects.
I'm giving the site a score of 65. Most of the archive sites in this network stopped updating 5 or more years ago, and the quality of the videos is poor: low definition, cheap sets, poor lighting, low technical production values, etc. There are some sites in the network that are still updating, and the videos at those sites are much higher quality. Also, there are a number of cute models at these other sites.
This is a personal opinion, but I don't enjoy watching videos of macho studs fucking young girls and then humiliating them for being stupid enough to have sex with them. It doesn't make me feel smarter or more macho.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Note: I said I was a member of the site for over 1 year. That's because I was a member of Nubile Films for over one year, which is the main site of what I will call the Nubile Films network. The Girls Only Porn site is a recent bonus to the Nubile Films site.
Or you could say, technically, I've only been a member of Girls Only Porn for a few months.
PROS(START OF):
-Girls Only Porn is the newest addition to the Nubile Films network. Nubile Films used to be a standalone site, with no extra sites. But recently they've been adding new sites to the membership. Hot Crazy Mess and The Sitcom Show were the first two sites added. But recently they added Girls Only Porn site.
-Username is your email address.
-Can choose your own password.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Can join with credit card, paypal, checking account, EU direct debit.
-They are having a special of $84/year recently. I have no idea how long that special discount will last.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Girls Only Porn is a good addition to the Nubile Films network. It's quality lesbian porn. The Nubile Films site is also a quality porn site, with excellent, quality porn that is crystal clear video, excellent technical features, streaming and downloading in 270p through 4K,
-Each video has a photoset.
-Photosets average around 38 photos per set. The photos are screen caps, but excellent quality, you can't tell the difference between these screencaps and real photos.
-The photoset downloads in a zip file that is only one definition: 3840x2160px.
The photoset downloads with the name of the scene, but you need to add the model names, date posted, site.
-Number of videos at site = 368.
The site videos go back to August 2012. So the site has been around a long time. But it's only recently that it was added as a bonus site to the Nubile Films site.
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
As a large lesbian site addition to Nubile Films, it's fine choice.
The first posted videos, from August 2012, go from 270p through 1080p.
The site started posting 4K videos in Oct 2020, so the 4K videos are a recent addition, and in the minority.
But 1080p is more than good enough for most PU members, I believe. Especially since the site started off offering the 1080p definition way back in 2012.
One of the strengths of the Girls Only Porn site is the level of attractiveness of the models: these girls are attractive to gorgeous:
A quote from Rabbits Reviews on the Nubile Films site: "If you love beautiful all-natural teens, this collection of outstanding porn scenes will be like a wet dream come true."
That quote applies equally to the Girls Only Porn site.
CONS(START OF):
-I believe the cons are minor.
I really like the site. I prefer b-g action, but for a lesbian site, this is excellent.
The videos are clear and crisp.
They update with 1, 2 or 3 new videos per month. The update rate could be improved, made more standardized.
But the models are cute to gorgeous.
And the navigation is so easy, it's like a dream compared to the Adult Time network, which is a jumbled mess.
BOTTOM LINE
The main attraction is the access to Nubile Films, but the Girls Only Porn is a fine addition. There are two other bonus sites you get access to: Hot Crazy Mess and That Sitcom Show.
That Sitcom Show is an archive site, last update was 2019-09-20.
The site videos are parodies of TV shows.
They are supposed to be funny, but I found the videos boring.
The other bonus site is Hot Crazy Mess.
That is also an archive site, with the last posted video on 2020-01-03.
The models at Hot Crazy Mess are mainly cute to very attractive.
And the videos are fine: It's a shame they stopped updating this site, because the site was much better than That Sitcom Show videos.
Giving the Girls Only Porn a score of 90.
Because the models are attractive young teens.
Because the videos are crystal clear (all videos go up to 1080p, the last few months the videos go up to 4K).
Easy navigation.
Very good options for streaming and downloading.
And because you get access to Nubile Films, which is an excellent porn site with outstanding models and professionally shot videos.
Girls Under Arrest is listed as a pay site by The Best Porn.
isthisreal is an adult time live series.
The public page (not the member page) of IsThisReal shows:
Adult Time
Live Series
Daily cam shows.
Free for members (of the Adult Time network, I assume).
I'm not very interested in cam shows.
But if you are a member of Adult Time, you can check out what the isthisreal series/channel offers.
The difference between a site, a channel, or a series seems to be blurred.
On a different public page, at least 2 of the Girls Under Arrest, Nocturnal Massage, Sister's Sex Tape, and some other series (or channels) are listed under the IsThisReal public page, so I assume all those series are part of the IsThisReal channel, as well as being part of the Adult Time network.
If you are a member of Adult Time, you can check out one or more of those series/channels/sites/whatEverYouCallThem yourself.
Because of the poor lighting, the skin tones of the models are poor: they don't look attractive or life-like.
If they deleted the channel, I think the value of network would improve, because I don't think the videos add any value to the network.
But if you're in the mood to watch some POV videos of fake cops abusing girls with blow jobs and hard fucking, you can fill that urge at this channel.
REVIEW(CONTINUED):
When a cop finds a teen girl who is good-looking, and she appears to have done something wrong, the cop reveals his human side: a blowjob and a fuck will usually get the girl off with a warning.
The site does not publish how many cops have sex with possible teen criminals.
This is supposed to be reality porn.
The site was started 2018.
The site has 11 videos.
The last video update was 2019-03-28.
So it's an archive site.
It should be easy examing 11 videos to see what the site has to offer:
The models are OK to good: Hannah Hays, Gia Valentina, Honey Gold, Alex Blake, Khloe Kapri, Kendra Spades and Julie Kay are all ready to show you what happens when you resist arrest in front of a big cop with a gun.
Many of the scenes take place at night. The lighting is poor. You can't see clearly what the mdels look like, whiat is happening. The camera work is poor: they are trying to film the video as POV, and the actors and camera are moving, so the camera is not centered on the action very well. Maybe it's supposed to add an element of realism to the scene, but I prefer to see clearly what is happening.
So, I don't like the lighting (too dark), the sound control (they are shooting outdoors, which requires better control over the sound than a studio shoot), poor placement of the camera (they are moving around outdoors, which is harder to film ant an indoor scene).
So the overall quality of the video technique is blow par.
Video runtime averages aroun 30 - 37 minutes.
You can stream videos: 288p through 1080p.
You can download the vidoes 160p through 1080p.
File sized for the different definiton downloads seem a little large: the 37 minute video at 1080p is 3.05 GB.
I'm giving the channel a low score of 59.
The channel is an archive, the channel stopped updating about 1 year after it started.
The main problems: the channel is small, 11 videos.
The quality of the videos is poor: this is because they were trying to make POV videos, at night, where the lighting was dark, the cameras could not be centered on the action because the models were moving around.
REVIEW CONTINUED IN THE NEXT REPLY:
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Girls Under Arrest is a series or channel on the Adult Time network. Membership in the Girls Under Arrest channel gives you access to the rest of the Adult Time network, and vice versa.
-PU has a discounted price for the first month of of $14.05, recurring at $29.95/month.
-Porn sites are constantly looking for a new idea to make thier content seem fresh and appealing.
This site features young girls who have problems with the law.
-Each video has an accompanying photoset that captures the action. There is a zip file for the photoset, and also for the video.
-The channel has all the features of the Adult Time network:
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-You can stream or download the videos in multiple definitions: from 160p through 1080p.
-Video runtime is from 28 to 44 minutes.
-Videos have a matching photoset that is zipped. Around 35 photos per photoset.
Cons:
-The major con is this is a small site: only 11 videos.
-The site is an archive site. Started 2018-08, last update 2019-04.
-The videos are shot POV style. Which allows for dark scenes, poor lighting, shifty camera angles, poor focus on the models because the models are moving and the camera-operator has to jiggle the cameria to follow the action.
-The photosets have a zip file, but only one definition for the zip file.
-Photosets download with a default generic numbered file name, that should be renamed if you want to know who the models are, what the scene represents.
-But the truth is, these photosets are not worth keeping. Although the video definitions range from 160p through 1080, the value of the videos is poor. Unless you enjoy watching cops abusing young girls into blowjobs and harsh fucking, in dimly lighted videos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
I respect the law, and know that law enforcement officers are among the finest, bravest citizens in our great country.
I can re-count some instances of where my family inter-acted with the law and was able to see how wonderful police officers can be.
I live in a condo association. Sometimes the US mailmen make a mistake and delive a piece of mail to wrong mail box.
I brought a piece of mail to my neighbor, and told him it was his mail, delivered to my mail box.
This was a strong, good-looking cop.
He kept his right hand in his pocket the entire time I spoke with him, instead of shaking hands with me. Did he have a small gun in his pocket, in case I was a criminal?
Better safe than sorry.
I'm an older man, now in my 70s, in poor health, so I don't think I'm much of a threat.
But the cop kept his hand in his right pocket the entire time I was at his door.
Also, he asked me where I got his mail.
Implying that maybe I stole it, which would be a federal crime.
My explanation that the mail delivery people sometimes put mail into the wrong box didn't seem to impress him.
And he was right to be suspicous. I could have jimmied his mail box and stolen the letter. Even though I didn't open it, I could have been using the letter as a trick to become friendly with him, as the beginning of a scam.
Cops are taught to be suspicous of people. My action of bringing him a piece of his mail could have been a setup for some crime.
Did he thank me for giving him the mail envelope?
No.
He took it, and shut the door.
No thank you.
Another time, I saw the inside light on his truck parked on his driveway was on, and the truck was empty.
I knocked on his door, told him the inside light on his truck was on.
He went out and turned off the light.
No thank you.
No sense of appreciation.
I guess I was lucky he didn't arrest me for coming onto his property.
Maybe he could have shot me, as a dangerous suspect, if he was having a bad day or wanted to blow off steam.
A different time I was walking for exercise in my neighborhood.
Two cops stopped me, asked what I was doing.
I told them I was walking for exercise. I'm almost 70 at the time, not a big or threatening guy.
They asked me if I was on probation. I said no. They asked me again if I was on probation. I said no. They asked me again if I was on probation. I said no.
Then they asked me if I was off of probation. I said no.
They asked me what my job was, I said I was retired. They asked what my job was before I retired. I gave them my wallet, to show that I lived one street over from the current location. That might have been a mistake, because I didn't ask before I reached for the wallet in my back pocket. They could have shot me for reaching for a weapon.
The asked me a few more questions, and let me go.
This was around 2:30 PM, broad daylight. There was no curfew or law against walking on public sidewalks.
You read in the paper where cops shoot unarmed people, sometimes killing them, because the suspect seems dangerous and the cops need to protect themselves.
This happens a lot, because in United States, cops are rarely punished for killing an unarmed suspect. What is a suspect? A suspect is anyone a cop encounters who is not a cop wearing a cop uniform with a badge and gun.
The motto of the police where I live is "To protect and to serve". But I've never felt served or protected when I meet a cop. A cop is an authority figure, with a gun, and if you don't do exactly what he says, you need to have a lawyer with you, or the cop's right are more powerful than your rights. That's on a practical basis.
Many years ago, back in the 1970s, I was walking down a public street, on my way to a black college library.
A cop pulled his car in front of me, I stopped walking, the cop got out of the car, asked me where I was going, I told him I was going to the library. He told me to lean my hands on the car, and ran his hands over my body. Then he said he hadn't searched me. I didn't say anything. He told me to get into the car, I did, and he drove me to the library. It was a black community college library. I'm white. He talked to someone, and told me I could never go back to the library again.
The public library was a few miles away. The black college library was within a few blocks from where I lived. But I never went back to the black college library.
What could I do? Hire a lawyer, which costs money, so I can go the library that is closest to me?
I had very little money. A cop tells you something, you do it.
It's not worth being arrested for going to a black college library.
I have no criminal record. Except for some traffic tickets. But if a cop tells you to do something, the smart thing to do is to say "Yes, sir" and do it. Anything else can you can get into trouble.
Anyway, this site doesn't get into the real nitty gritty of dealing with cops.
This site features actors playing good ol' boy cops who are looking for kicks and maybe a little sex on the side.
REVIEW CONTINUED IN REPLY:
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Girlsway is part of the Adult Time network. So you get a massive amount of porn of many niches with a sub to Girlsway.
-The level of attractiveness of the models at Girlsway is excellent.
-With a yearly sub, you basically get unlimited downloading privileges. Yes, there is a 300 GB daily limit for downloads, but unless you're downloading 4K videos, I doubt that would bother you.
The yearly sub costs $89 with a PU discount (if you join through Adult Time directly, using the PU link), but there are holiday specials where the price is even lower. For the amount of porn you can access at the network, that is bargain.
-You can stream videos online in your choice of definition from 288p through 4K. There is no streaming limit that I am aware of.
-The download options (if included in your sub) are 160p through 4K.
-The videos are professionally shot, so you get excellent quality lighting, colors, sound control, clarity, focus.
Cons:
-Monthly subs don't usually include download privileges. A yearly sub is I what I would recommend.
-Navigation can be tricky. You have so much content stuffed into the Girlsway channel, and the network, that it can be hard to find the content that appeals to you.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-They tweak the network to make it better, but some of the tweaks make the network harder to use. For example, they now require passwords to be 8 characters or more, must contain 1 digit, 1 uppercase, 1 lowercase and 1 special character. I had the same working password for over 4 years, until I was blocked from the network and had to choose a new password that met the new specs.
Bottom Line:
Girlsway is an excellent lesbian site.
The models are uniformly attractive. The plots are simple where the characters experience simple relationship problems and find happiness with either a new partner or a current partner. This is basically soft lesbian love (very little force, no harsh sex, no cruelty or over-the-top sexual athletics. Instead, you get soft words, touches, caresses, lots of kisses. So the genre would be softcore romantic porn, if there is such a genre.
I'm a sucker for attractive models. So I enjoy watching Hazel Moore and Kenna James and other young women find some relief and happiness from the world's problems. Especially Kenna James, who has some daddy issues, and wants to get pregnant by her stepfather in another Adult Time channel, yet is able to find love and happiness with attractive women in the Girlsway channel. Being a porn model means you have to be able to switch sides as your needs arise.
If you're a romantic and enjoy watching attractive women having sex with each other, I think Girlsway is an excellent channel in the Adult Time network.
And you have access to a multitude of other niches in the Adult Time network, with over 60,000 hardcore videos and hundreds of different channels available.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Girls Way is part of the Adult Time network. I don't believe it exists as a separate network by itself any more. Therefore, you get access to the entire Adult Time network.
-Customer service is 24/7. Telephone, email, live chat. I recommend live chat, since that's the fastest way to get a response. Live chat answers within a few minutes.
-The main reason to join Girls Way is because of how attractive many of the models are.
Some of the featured models include Dillion Harper, Karlee Grey, August Ames, Eliza Ibarra, Kenzie Reeves, Gianna Dior, Carter Cruise.
-There is a fine model listing which has small thumbnails of the models. The thumbnails are clear, but I wish they were larger, because a lot of the girls are really cute.
-The model page for each individual model has links to her content at the channel and network. Clicking on the hot link brings up the video you selected.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-There is a text description for each individual video. The video tags can be sparse, but the text description gives you a great idea of the plot of the video.
-Photo set for each video. Zip file for the photo set.
CONS(START OF):
-Cons are basically minor. This is a great channel in the Adult Time network.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-There are supposed to be trailers for each video. I can't play any of the trailers. Don't know if this is due to my PC, or the network server. However, there is a fine text description of each video, that tells you what the action is.
Bottom Line:
-Girls Way is a lesbian site. Most of the models are teens or early twenties, but you do get some older women as well, playing the "Mommy" role or the "older woman" role.
The site/channel features story-driven lesbian porn. Tribbing, pussy licking, squirting, toys, there's a mix of lesbian action. I enjoy the innocent teens seduced by other teens and older women, especially when the innocent teen puts on a good show.
Many of the teen girls are fucking cute. I know they're supposed to be lesbians, but watching these girls in action, playing tender young things, I want to throw them on the floor and fuck their brains out. Gabbie Carter, large juicy breasts, firm ass, yes, she's a porn star, but she seems like a sweet young thing you could take home to your parents (parents who don't watch porn, obviously).
One of the benefits of the Adult Time network is it has over 200 channels. Many of the channels are a sampling of other fine porn sites: Sexart, Femjoy, Joymii, Club Sweethearts, Viv Thomas, Bare Maidens, etc. Look through the sample channel to see if the content is to your taste, and if the original site is worth a join.
Adult Time updates multiple times each day. Girls Way updates about 11 or 12 times per month, which is fast, considering that you have over 200 different channels in the Adult Time network.
I'm giving Girls Way a score of 93. Mostly because you have access to Adult Time, one of the finest bargains in porn today. But Girls Way is one of the better channels in the Adult Time network, with a large amount of really attractive models that are worth watching in action.
But Gia is surprised to find out that the only thing Whitney's mad about is that her mom didn't wait for her to begin the threesome they had planned all along. Whitney strips down, eager to join in and make up for lost time.
Whitney may have arrived a little late, but better late than never!
Story inspired by an original submission by Girlsway member, Nyx!
Title of video: "Just Couldn't Wait"
Posted to site: 2019-09-21
Description
Reagan Foxx is in her living room when the doorbell rings. She smiles mischievously to herself as she gets up to answer it. When she opens the door, she's greeted by her step-daughter's girlfriend, Gia Paige. Hi! Gia smiles, slightly nervous. Hi there, Reagan says with a hint of flirtation. She's sorry, but Whitney isn't here, Reagan says. Oh, well, they were supposed to hang out today, Gia says in disappointment. Well, she should be back soon, why doesn't Gia wait for her here? Reagan says, gesturing for Gia to come in. Oh..um...ok! Gia says.
Whitney just went to the store, she shouldn't be long, Reagan smiles as they sit down on the couch. So Whitney and her have been together for awhile now huh? Reagan asks, making small talk, 'you must be coming up on SOME kind of big milestone?' Um, yeah, since they both turned 23, so...almost a year now, Gia smiles. Whitney is amazing, Gia comments. She's really lucky to be with her, Gia adds sincerely.
'From where I'm sitting, it seems like SHE'S pretty lucky too. You are...GORGEOUS,' Reagan says smoothly. Oh, wow, thanks, Gia says modestly. And she can definitely see where Whitney gets HER beauty from, Gia says. Well, she's Whitney's STEPMOM, not her real mom, but she'll take the compliment wherever she can! Reagan laughs.
Of course...wow, DUH! She KNEW that, laughs Gia. Sorry, she just...she can get kind of awkward when she's nervous, Gia says. Why is she nervous? Reagan asks knowingly. Oh, nothing, it's...it's stupid, Gia tries to wave it off. 'Ohhh... I think I see what this is... Do you have a little...CRUSH on me?' Reagan asks teasingly. Um, NO! Gia lies quickly, laughing as if it's the most ridiculous thing she's ever heard. Having a crush on her girlfriend's stepmom would be...it would just be...WRONG, Gia says, but it's clear by the look on her face that the fact that it's wrong only adds to the appeal. There's no need to be embarrassed, Reagan says softly. She's NOT embarrassed! Gia maintains with a nervous laugh. There is a charged moment as they lock eyes.
'Can I tell you a secret?' Reagan asks, wanting to press her advantage. Um...sure, Gia says. Reagan leans closer to her. 'I have a crush on you too,' Reagan says seductively. Gia's eyes go wide. 'B-but I DON'T--' Gia stammers, but is cut off when Reagan leans in and kisses her. Caught off-guard, Gia returns her kiss passionately. But after a moment, Gia comes back down to earth and breaks away. Oh wow, that...this...this CAN'T happen, Gia says, breathing heavily. She CAN'T do this to Whitney, Gia adds firmly. 'Trust me, you DON'T need to worry about Whitney,' Reagan says, caressing Gia's face.
Gia gives in to the purely physical pleasure, her reasoning forgotten. She kisses Reagan back as they slip their clothes off. As Reagan sinks to her knees and eats Gia's pussy, Reagan's step-daughter Whitney Wright suddenly walks in, looking angry.
CONINUED IN NEXT REPLY:
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-This review is based on the Adult Time channel of Girlsway.
In this review, if I write "Girlsway", I am referring to the Adult Time channel of Girlsway.
There is also a separate Girlsway site.
The thebestporn review of the Girlsway site, Facts Updated: 09-05-19, states that the Girlsway site has 1,684+ Scenes.
The Adult Girlsway channel, on 10-19-19, shows videos: 1,711.
So I would assume that the Girlsway channel is a fair sample of the Girlsway site videos.
There is a zip file for the photo set, based on each video. The number of photos per set averages around 71.
The thebestporn review of the Girlsway site, facts updated: 09-05-19, states that the Girlsway site photosets average 120 pics.
Therefore, for any purists, who want to only read a review based on the original/current Girlsway site, you can stop reading this review now.
If you haven't already stopped reading the review.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Unlimited downloads.
-Unlimited streaming.
-The customer support service with FameSupport is excellent. One of the best customer support teams I've ever used. Not only are they 24/7, but there is a live chat that is 24/7, and the support member answers your chat within a few minutes. I used to think the MetArt support was one of the finest support teams, because they usually answered emails within a few hours. But with online chat, the FameSupport is even faster. And the FameSupport team has answered my questions with courtesy, honesty, and intelligence.
-Your choice of download definition: 160 - 2160p. 2160p is also called 4K, or UHD.
-Your choice of streaming definition: 288 - 2160p.
-You can stream/download the full video or a trailer for the video.
-There is a text description that does an excellent job summarizing the plot/action.
See the first reply to this review to see a sample text description of a video from the Girlsway channel.
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
The description is almost like a very brief porn story.
Actually, if you have a monitor that is capable of split screen, you can read the text description while playing a slide show of the photo set. Or, even better, use two monitors, one for the photo set, one for the text description. It would be a home-version of a porn play.
-There is an active member comment section, that gives opinions about the videos. Sometimes the Girlsway staff will chime in with information and personal viewpoints about a video or the comments on the video. The staff comments indicate the Girlsway staff are interested in producing a quality product, and are keeping a watchful eye on the site and on members' opinions.
-They tag (categorize) their videos with the basic elements of the video:
A sample from a video shows:
Categories
Big Tits Member Fantasy Threesome Natural Tits Fingering Teen MILF & Mature Pussy Licking Hairy Facesitting Step Mom Family Roleplay Tribbing Lesbian Step Daughter
-Content is exclusive (but a purist could argue that since this is an Adult Time Girlsway channel, and there is a separate Girlsway site, the content is not exclusive.)
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The biller is FameAid, a proprietary biller. Normally I prefer CCBill or Epoch, but I've had several memberships using FameAid, and never had a problem.
-The site indicates there are 35 pictures in each photo set, but when you download the zip file, you will normally find 71 pictures in each photo set.
-There is only one zip file definition, instead of multiple definitions for a photo set.
-I suspect the photo sets are actually made from the video using a computer program. So they would normally be considered screen shots. Except that the photos are of excellent quality, with good focus and composition, so it's a high-grade program that is used to make the photo sets, and far beyond the quality of screen shots from years ago, which were obviously screen shots. Looking at the individual photos, I would not think they were screen shots, but real photos. (Or, maybe I don't know the technology to describe what the photos are: they are good-looking photographs, and not cheap screen shots.)
-Because Adult Time is such a massive collection of channels and videos, it's sometimes hard to figure out whether a particular lesbian video is part of the Girlsway channel, or some other channel.
That would be a navigation problem.
And a mindset problem.
If I see a thumbnail of two cute girls getting it on, do I care if it's part of the Girlsway channel, or not? I tend to switch to the video, and watch it, instead of trying to stay 100% inside of the Girlsway channel.
For example, "Teen Lez Coeds", with Anie Darling and Lady Bug, is part of the Girls Who Fuck Girls, and I don't know if Girls Who Fuck Girls is part of Girlsway or a completely separate channel.
Having said that, Girls Who Fuck Girls has a lot of pretty teens in some hot lesbian videos.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Girlsway is a lesbian channel. That means girls (and women) making love to one another.
The channel is a premium channel: by which, I mean, it offers high quality videos. The videos are high quality in production values (good focus, good sound control, good lighting, nice sets, etc.).
The models range from average to attractive.
The Girlsway is a lesbian channel that includes several sub-channels, such as Web Young, Little Red, Maid for Each Other.
Girls Who Fuck Girls is an Adult Time channel featuring lesbian teens.
I don't know if it's part of the Girlsway channel or not.
But if you are into lesbian girls, it's worth checking out.
There are many different ways to get the Girlsway channel of Adult Time.
You can subscribe directly to the Adult Time network.
You can subscribe to one of the sites that includes Adult Time as a free extra.
The Girlsway site itself includes free access to the Adult Time network.
I recommend waiting for a holiday, where a special discount is often offered on sites that include Adult Time access, or a special discount to the Adult Time network itself.
I believe, as I've written in various prior reviews on porn sites, that Adult Time is one of the best bargain in porn today.
For a low price, even lower with a discounted holiday price, you get access to over 60,000 scenes from the top names and studios, updated multiple times a day.
You get a broad range of porn sites.
Many of the models are attractive to incredibly attractive.
Most of the videos are high quality: some of them are like theatrical movies. I especially enjoy some of the Pure Taboo videos.
Do I recommend Girlsway? Yes, because it's part of the Adult Time network.
If you are into lesbian sex, this channel gives you a massive amount of high-quality content.
And there is plenty of other lesbian content throughout the Adult Time network.
So you get high-quality content, for a very low price.
I'm giving the channel a score of 95, as part of Adult Time network.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Give Me Teens is a channel in the Adult Time network.
Years ago it used to be part of the Devils Film/Fame Digital network.
My best guess is that it still is part of Devils Film; if you go to the site: givemeteens.com,
the page shows "Devil's Film presents Give Me Teens".
Joining Give Me Teens, or Devils Film, gives you access to Adult Time network.
And vice versa: joining Adult Time gives you access to Devils Film and Give Me Teens.
And in the Adult Time website, Give Me Teens has the text "Part of devilsfilm".
-The channel has videos dating back to 2006, so you can find porn stars when they were first starting out.
-The site is a smorgasbord of teen, boy/girl, 3-somes, lesbian, cocksucking, vaginal and anal sex, with plenty of young/old sex as well.
Cons:
-The earliest videos were low-rent videos filmed in 240p and 480p definition.
-Cheap sets, mainly unattractive models, stupid or unimaginative dialog, poor acting, makes watching most of these videos a waste of time.
I would far rather watch well-produced videos with attractive models. Why waste time on crap?
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
Give Me Teens stats:
Videos: 1412
Video runtime: averages around 35 minutes.
Normally, I give any chanel in the Adult Time network a score in the 90s, because of the vast amount of hardcore content covering a wide variety of niches, and because most of the content is good to very good.
However, the models at Give Me Teens are not very attractive.
The models at the Wow/Diesel sites are far superior in looks. The models at many teen sites are far more attractive.
The plots are stupid, the dialog is stupid, the acting is poor.
In my opinion, the Adult Time network would be improved if they deleted the Give Me Teens channel.
Why keep low quality crap like the Give Me Teens channel?
Adult Time has thousands of teen-oriented videos apart from the Give Me Teens channel, so there's no need for over 1,000 videos featuring almost entirely unattractive teens with stupid plots, stupid dialog, poor acting.
I do admit there are a few attractive teens at the channel.
But slogging through the junk to find the attractive teens is not worth the effort.
When the site first started out, and for a few years afterwards, they did put effort into using attractive teens. But those early videos are only available in 240p and 480p definition, and most PU members wouldn't watch such low-definition videos. They would require 1080p or higher.
Edit: I'm being hard on this site. If you enjoy watching porn that reminds you of your first experience with porn videos, this site might give you some nostalgia value: the sets seem cheap, the acting is atrocious, the models look like porn stars (not a compliment). But I remember watching Emmanuelle, the French softcore porn movie around 1974, and Story of O around 1975. The images for those movies were clear and crisp, the colors vivid, and they were shown in regular movie theaters, not porno movie theaters. Porn was suddenly gaining acceptance, beyond the low-grade shit shown in home movies.
The internet gives you access to quality porn, with high production values, and attractive to beautiful models.
The Give Me Teens site is low quality porn.
Navigation is simple and easy: All you have at the site are photosets (except for the small number of Staff Selection videos).
Photosets are dated.
There are some tags for the photosets.
In 2016, after MetArt took over running Domai and Goddess Nudes from the original owner, they raised the price from $10/month to $30/month or $100/year.
At $10/month, it was a worthwhile join.
For $30/month, or $100/year, I feel it's an expensive membership.
You can pay the same price, or a lower price, for many other fine photographic sites, or photo + videos sites.
So I would join Domai or Goddess Nudes once in a blue moon, if you have extra money to spend.
That's in spite of the model catalog of attractive to lovely young models.
My feeling is that MetArt has priced the site too high for what it offers.
If you want a softcore site, I would suggest joining MetArt.com.
That site blows both the Domai and Goddess Nudes sites out of the water.
MetArt stats: MetArt updates with 4 (photoset + video) per day.
Number of photosets: 22544
Number of videos: 1804
Number of models: 3831
Number of photographers: 291
The models at MetArt range from merely attractive to gorgeous. MetArt uses a more glamorous style than Goddess nudes.
The settings are more expensive, the costumes are more expensive. MetArt is probably the finest softcore teen site on the internet.
I say teen, because that's the way MetArt started out around 1999.
But they can feature models in the twenties and even in their thirties, as well.
REVIEW CONTINUES IN NEXT REPLY:
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Simple, basic, non-glamour, softcore solo photo site.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Navigation is simple, based on this is a photoset only site (except for some "Staff Selection" videos and photosets which cost extra to download).
-You get low, medium and high definition download and online viewing of the photosets.
-Unlimited downloads.
-Content is exclusive.
Cons:
-No videos (except for the limited "Staff Selection" videos, which cost extra to download.
-The number of photos per set is surprisingly small. Often less than 50 photos in a set.
-Slow update rate. Down to about 2 sets per week. Used to be 5 sets per week, years ago.
-High membership price. Used to be $10/month or less, years ago. Then, in 2016, MetArt raised the price to $30/month or $100/year.
-No bonus sites (except for the live cam shows).
-The photos are high quality, but use a simple, basic style: solo female model, very simple indoor or outdoor setting, non-glamour. A set can start out with a girl wearing inexpensive clothes, or can start out with the girl already nude. But it's not a tease or strip, you are just viewing nude photos of the girl walking around, lying on the floor, I mean, very simple poses.
-Pre-ckecked cross-sale on join page.
I think of myself as a meat and potatoes guy. Maybe a purist or connoisseur could tell the difference between the two sites. I can't tell. To me, both sites are essentially similar. The main difference is that the two sites have different names. But any content from one site could have been posted in the other site.
In the same manner, All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn are three different sites. Sharing many or most of the same models. Sharing many or most of the same themes: teen female nudity and sex, softcore and hardcore. The content at any one of the three sites could have been posted at the other two sites. To illustrate this point, a video posted at one site has, in the past, had the accompanying photoset (the photoset that was made during the shooting of the video) posted at the other site: For example a Wow Girls video had the photoset made during that video shoot posted at Wow Porn. And vice versa. So the sites not only shared many or most of the same models, but also shared the same themes, photographers, technical crew, etc.
The above is not a criticism of any of sites I mentioned. Domai and Goddess Nudes are fine sites.
All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn are fine sites, and the three sites are one of my favorite porn networks. Currently, the three sites are marketed as a single network: you join any one of the three sites, and you get access to all three sites. And for several months now, you also get access to Ultra Films, another fine site with the same models from what is now called the Wow network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn).
The Wow network used to be called the Diesel network years ago.
Wow network plus Ultra Films have been having a special for 6 months or more: you can join the Wow network and Ultra Films for $70/year. Which is a great price: I paid more than that for the Wow network, and I paid a separate membership fee for Ultra Films. And now you get all 4 sites for less than I was paying for Wow network. For less than what I paid for Ultra Films.
I'm sorry I'm going off-topic in this review. But if you haven't ever joined the Wow network before, or if you have but aren't a current member, I highly recommend joining the Wow network plus Ultra Films, if you can find the special discount of $70/year for the 4 sites.
That's if you are a fan of lovely young teens in hardcore action. With some softcore content, as well, but mainly hardcore action.
Going back to Goddess Nudes. Goddess Nudes is softcore nudity.
Like Domai, Goddess Nudes is photoset only. No videos.
Let me explain about the no videos statement: there are a few videos at the site. But they are listed as "Staff Selection". This means that to download any Staff Selection video you have to pay extra to download it. The same Staff Selection videos are also posted at all the MetArt network sites. So the Staff Selection videos are a feature of the MetArt network of sites, and not basically a feature of any one individual MetArt network site.
Also, if you are a lifetime member of any MetArt network site, you can download all the Staff Selection videos, without paying extra. But that's only if you are a lifetime member.
To become a lifetime member of any MetArt network site, you normally have to pay $400 to $800, which is a one-time fee. Lifetime members of a site have free access to that site.
With full lifetime streaming and downloading privileges.
The same setup and features of Domai are repeated at Goddess Nudes: you get limited physical data on the models, but no bios.
The update rate used to be 5 updates per week. The same as Domai.
But like Domai, the rate has slowed to about 2 updates per week.
Most of the models are slender white girls, late teens or early twenties.
From the website, the following stats are shown:
Number of photosets: 2634
Number of models: 1143
Contributing photographers: 143
Photosets contain from 30 to 100 or more photos. But most sets are under 50 photos.
The photography is excellent, but it uses a simple, non-glamorous style: Not a lot of make-up on the models, the clothing is simple, not expensive.
You get a mix of indoor and outdoor shoots.
Strictly softcore. Solo women only photoshoots. No men allowed.
REVIEW CONTINUES IN THE FIRST REPLY SECTION:
I've complained about the Adult Time network navigation problems in the past.
Some people praise how easy it is to navigate the network.
They must have some secret I haven't learned yet.
But navigation is probably the main reason I don't use Adult Time as much as I would like to.
I haven't checked thoroughly the entire network.
I have a slow wifi connection, and can't load pages fast or easily to check.
But for just the Heavy Handfuls site, I did just check now, you're right:
the oldest scenes only have 480p for streaming and downloading, with multiple bit rates for streaming and downloading.
They started offering some videos in 720p and 1080p, at the same time they were posting some videos that only had 480p. And the bit rates offered for each definition could vary for the different videos.
This started around 2008, and went on for years.
This is assuming the posting dates for the videos are accurate.
As far as I can tell, they started offering 4K definition in 2021 at this site.
The gap between the posting dates can be very large, sometimes years.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Note: if you join Heavy Handfuls directly, you pay a high price.
$119.95/year, or $29.95/month.
Joining NewSensations.com directly, you pay $95/year, or $29.95/month.
I'd wait for a holiday special, when prices often drop to $60/year, or a lower monthly fee if you don't want to join for a long term membership. That is for joining through New Sensations, which has a cheaper price than joining Heavy Handfuls, even though both memberships give you access to the same sites and same network.
-Part of the New Sensations network, with over 7,500 videos of good quality.
-Site features women with large breasts. Some of the breasts seem natural, others are obvious boob jobs.
-The sex videos at Heavy Handfuls give you slightly more plot than the average video at New Sensations, but that's not saying much. For example, a guy just broke up with his girlfriend, the stepmother offers sympathy, and then she's jumping on top of him on the couch, within the first three minutes of the video.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
So one minute of sympathy, one minute of walking him to the couch, then, BAM!, she shoving her tongue down his mouth and pulling back to push her dress down to bare her huge breasts, while the guy is still gulping for air. But then he starts sucking her breasts, those huge, massive titties, and it's off to the races.
Who needs plot when the porn world gives you these true-to-life scripts?
If you're a breast fan, this site is for you.
-I don't think the New Sensations network, or this site, gives you a lot of bells and whistles in the technical department. But New Sensations gives the same layout to all the sites I've seen so far.
-You get unlimited streaming and unlimited downloading.
-You get quality videos: mainly A-list models, attractive to very attractive, good colors and good lighting, nice sets,
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
a lot of sex. They try to vary the minimal plots, settings, models, costumes, for variety.
CONS(START OF):
-I don't think there are any serious cons.
-If you can get a cheap price for the network, I think you get your money's worth.
But join during a holiday special for $60/year. And join through the New Sensations network.
If you join through one of the included sites, your membership does not give you anything more than a regular New Sensations membership, but you might be charged a higher price.
-You get at least one pre-checked cross-sale on the join page, you might find a second pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. I uncheck them, for different reasons:
Most of the pre-checked cross-sales are for sites I don't need a trial member to.
All these short-term trial memberships, after 2 or 3 days, turn into an expensive monthly membership that is far higher than you would pay normally.
-There are ads for competing sites on every member page. Some of the ads are for low prices, that might be worth joining. I've seen ads for $5 for the first month of Metart, which is the lowest price I've ever seen for Metart, a fine softcore glamour site. But I already have a lifetime membership to Metart.
-Boredom from watching too much porn that you don't enjoy. Finding enough porn that you really enjoy can be a problem. Much of the porn at this site, and the network, can seem plain-vanilla, after you watch too much. But that's true at most porn sites.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
If you wait for a holiday special, when you can join for $60/yearly, or for a low monthly price through New Sensations, is a worthwhile join. I think you get more than your money's worth with some enjoyable porn.
For some reason, if you join through one of the satellite sites (a site that is part of New Sensations, and gives you the same access to the same sites), you might pay a higher price.
That's just the way some networks work. I'd hate to pay $120 for a year's membership, and then find that I could have had it for $60 during a holiday special if I got the same access through a different portal.
Let me re-phrase that: you can pay $120 to access a network. Or you can pay $60 for the same access. It can depend on when you purchase the membership. And through which portal.
Technically, a membership in Heavy Handfuls is not the same as a membership in New Sensations.
But both memberships give you the same privileges: access to the same sites.
I've had this difference pointed out to me with a membership in a Wow network site and also a membership to 21 Sextury (part of the Adult Time network). It's a technical or legal difference, that on a practical level, doesn't seem to matter, as far as I can tell. Except that it probably does matter, in certain circumstances, or they wouldn't make such a big deal about it.
Bottom line: access to Heavey Handfuls is a great thing is you're a fan of big-breasts.
And even if you don't think big breasts are the greatest, it's still worth glancing through the videos to find what you can enjoy.
Some of the plots (even though they are mainly minimal) can be interesting: you wonder how much better the video would be if they put more thought into the writing and acting.
But these are basically good quality videos: the videos are professionally shot, good sets, good camera-work, mainly attractive models, good lighting and sound control.
And you get access to over 7500 videos, with your network membership.
So I think it's worth more than $60/year.
Note: Maybe I'm paying too much attention to price. But the link to Heavy Handfuls from PU (and TBP) leads to a join page at Heavy Handfuls that currently shows:
$119.95/year
$29.95/month
PU (and TBP) shows
$119.95/year
$14.95/month
Maybe Heavy Handfuls changes their prices once in a while.
But check to see what price you're paying.
It pays to check.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discounted price of $75/year. Or $400 for a lifetime membership. But I've read one PU member complaining he paid for a lifetime membership to Hegre, then it somehow got cancelled. I've read other people saying their lifetime memberships to other sites have been cancelled (to Playboy+, for example.) It even happened to me, at Glam Deluxe, while it was still alive.
-Some of the most gorgeous women in the world have appeared nude at Hegre. Except the same can be said for many of the best softcore sites on the internet: Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy, etc. etc.
-The quality of the photographs is first-rate.
-The technical features for viewing the photographs is outstanding. One of the best sites for viewing photo sets online I've ever seen. Can flick through the photos, or examine them in detail.
-Photo sets are available in original, large size, medium size, and small size definition.
Cons:
-The photos are basically boring and sterile for me. Yes, there are lots of beautiful models, but there is a lack of eroticism to the photos. For one thing, the photographer seems to have created his photo sets by setting the camera to automatic, and it goes click-click-click-click while the model barely moves or changes her position. For another, he often cuts off part of the model's face.
I think the photographer is treating the model as a statue or a piece of meat, not as a real human person you want to relate to.
-Years ago, Hegre was softcore photosets. But for many years now, the site has featured mid-core and hard photos and videos.
-Maybe it's just me, but the Hegre hardcore photos and videos are just not arousing or exciting. The site seems sterile to me, in spite of the gorgeous models. If you have the same model at Hegre and at Metart or MPL studios or Femjoy (which are basically softcore), I much prefer the Metart, MPL Studios, and Femjoy photo sets, because the model seems
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
much more human.
Note: I'm now into my 70s, so I'm not as sensitive to nudity or semi-nudity as I was when I was younger. But I fail to appreciate most of the content at Hegre, while I can still find images from Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy that are enjoyable or arousing.
BOTTOM LINE (START OF):
The photo sets are technically first-rate photography, but in spite of the lovely models, I find the photos sterile.
I appreciate the technical features of the Hegre site: how easy it is to flick through a photo set, to enlarge any photo to examine it, the quality of the photos. Except the photos are sterile and boring. Boring because the images are a montage of a camera set to automatically capture a composite of the model who is barely moving, so each photo is almost an exact duplicate of the photo before it. Seems like a quick way to create a boring photo set, to me. With no thought to make it meaningful.
Then why am I a member for over a year?
Because I originally signed up for a year's membership, and then forgot to cancel.
Hegre has some truly lovely models. But I just can't appreciate the photography. Or the videos, which are now hardcore. I have nothing against hardcore, but I don't enjoy the hardcore at Hegre.
What I've written is my own personal opinion.
Most other PU member reviews that I've seen have rated Hegre in the 90s, and think it's one of the better high quality sites on the internet.
So, I suggest joining the site for a month, to see what the site has to offer, if it appeals to your tastes.
You might find it is a quality site that is definitely worth joining for a year or more.
I don't know why, but I find the videos boring, non-erotic, in spite of the lovely models and the crisp lighting.
I highly recommend the Hegre site for viewing photos online.
And some of their models are freaking gorgeous.
Hegre is a fine site, offering lovely young models in clear, crisp images and videos.
But it was a mistake for me to join for a year, in spite of the $75 price.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
