I think all 3 reviews (exotics4me, mbaya, and LKLK) gave a good to excellent review of the channel, as well as the importance of the Adult Time network.
So any casual reader of the reviews should have gained a good overview of what the channel offers. Which should be one of the main reasons for a review.
Except that lately, my reviews have taken a slightly different approach. I'm like a travel writer sampling sites instead of giving a more disciplined approach. So I tend to throw a lot of random thoughts into my reviews.
Which could be distracting.
The PU staff does allow freedom of expression, which I do appreciate.
Otherwise, I would have to follow a more formulaic approach, which gets boring after writing so many reviews.
Plagiarism (joke).
Or maybe great minds think alike.
I posted a review of Pure Taboo on 12-11-19.
I wrote it was my favorite channel in the Adult Time network.
But I also wrote, as a pro:
"-The search engine searches the entire Adult Time network: it does not limit the hits to a particular channel. This is good and bad: good, because it makes the search for a model's content easier: bad, because if you want to search only for the model's content at a particular channel, I don't know how to do that. Overall, I'm glad the search is network-wide, instead of being limited to any one channel.
But if the programmer added a filter to search a single site, that might improve the navigation slightly."
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Note: I am giving the site a score of 95. That's not because of how perfect the site is: it's not perfect. But what impresses me so much is the sheet amount of hardcore content, for a very low price. Covering a wide variety of niches. With unlimited streaming and downloads. So I am willing to overlook that there are problems navigating the site, because of what is offered at such a low price.
PROS(START OF):
-Very low-priced memberships. Can get a month's membership for $6.99 with a RabbitsReviews discount.
-There is a huge amount of videos on offer. Supposedly, over 500,000 videos at the site, from about 2,000 studios. Many of the studios are first-rate studios. So this is a great place to sample or view the type of offerings from sites like Porn Fidelity, Teeny Lovers, etc.
-A large amount of daily updates.
-The videos have a small, unobtrusive watermark that shows the title of the video, and the site it came from.
-The model listing shows 14,055 porn stars (both female and male).
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
That's a huge number of porn stars to sift through. That's good and bad. It will take time to find the porn stars you're interested in watching.
-The model listing gives a small thumbnail of the model, plus the number of videos (and photos, if listed). Even though the thumbnail is small, it's clear enough to show you what the model looks like.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-The model listing shows a wide range of models, in age, physical type, etc.
CONS(START OF):
-Different videos have different ranges for streaming/downloading options.
Many videos only have 240p-360p-480p options.
However, even a 480p definition video seems clear and crisp on my laptop monitor, so I'm not very disappointed by the low-definition videos I've seen so far.
Actually, watching these videos on my 12" laptop monitor, I can't tell the different in quality between a 480p video and a 1080p video. Maybe it's my poor eyesight: I'm in my 70s,
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
and I wear both distance and reading glasses, but I really can't tell the difference between watching a 480p and a 1080p video. The difference would be more apparent on a larger monitor. But my 12" laptop monitor is 1080p, so it's a monitor that is supposed to be fine for watching videos.
-The download options are lacking. Normally, you can choose the folder where you download photo sets or videos. But with Fap House, unless you are using a download manager, the content automatically downloads to your "downloads" folder.
-I just joined this site a few days ago, so I'm still learning to use it. But some videos, when you play them, they stop playing after two minutes or less, while the runtime is supposed to be 20 minutes or longer. That's for online streaming. The downloaded video file plays normally, with no shortened runtime.
-The model listing seems a jumbled mess. It's not listed alphabetically by model name, but listing in apparently random order. Since you have over 14,000 names, you really need an alphabetical listing, and other ways to sort the models' names.
-There is a search box to search model's names. But most porn stars have multiple names for different sites, so that is not as useful as you might think.
-Also, there are some false positives when you do a search for a model's name.
For example, search "Carolina Sweet", and it brings up a video for "Carolina Sweets", who is a different model. So I don't know how you're going to find the video content for "Carolina Sweet" at the network.
-A lot of videos don't name the model. You play a video, you might remember the model's face, but not her name. So how can you identify the model? You can't.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
For a very low price, you get access to a tremendous amount of hardcore porn, covering a wide array of niches, from a huge amount of porn sites and studios. I used to think Adult Time was the biggest bargain in porn. But this network seems like a worthwhile rival to Adult Time. And in some ways it might offer a better bargain:
the price of membership is far lower.
$6.99 for one month (which is what Rabbits Reviews shows).
The prices listed at the PU site are not current.
PU shows:
Monthly: $9.99 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $23.97 (3 months, recurring)
Multi-Mo: $299.99 (Lifetime)
1 Year: $71.88 (recurring)
I joined for $199.99, which is the price that's shown when you use the PU link to Fap House.
That's for a lifetime sub. No rebills. No extra charges, for streaming or downloads.
PU lists a lifetime sub for $299.99.
Even though a lot of videos don't name the model, if you're a long-time fan of teen porn, you will recognize many of the faces of the teen models at teeny lovers. It's like a poster-child of teen porn models from Eastern Europe from 8 years or more ago.
I still think Adult Time is one of the best bargains in porn today. It gives you a quality product covering a wide range of niches, for a low price.
The price at Fap House is lower. But the overall quality is more mixed.
Having said that the quality is more mixed, I think that, whether you're a beginner or a old-timer in porn, Fap House, because of the tremendous amount of hardcore porn, for a very low price, is definitely worth a join.
A massive number of niches.
Content from over 2,000 studios.
An incredible amount of hardcore porn: over 400,000 videos.
Unlimited streaming and downloading included.
Definition ranges from 240p, on up to 4K on some videos.
Navigation seems basic, but doable. With the vast amount of content, large amount of models, you will need to spend a lot of time searching for the content that appeals to you. But it should be easier, if you start your search, by selecting the studios and sites that you're already familiar with, that have content at this network.
Very good review.
Honest opinions nicely expressed. Femjoy is a fine site, but I'm already signed up to MetArt and bunch of other photo sites, so I won't be joining very soon.
But that's me.
Other PU members could very well enjoy this site.
I read recently that Femjoy was bought by Gamma Entertainment, the people who run Adult Time.
Now I see on my Adult Time membership a tiny amount of free content from Femjoy at Adult Time.
Hoping that Adult Time will expand access to Femjoy through an Adult Time membership, which would mean free access to Femjoy, one of the biggest glamour photo sites on the internet.
Femjoy is a direct competitor to MetArt, the biggest site for glamour photos on the internet.
Maybe you can send a private email to Freddie, asking for a new membership badge for 4K members.
LOL.
Better yet, start a new thread, asking for all PU members to vote on the 4K membership badge.
(The PU staff seems to be hit-or-miss on updates to the PU site.) If there is heavy PU membership support for the idea, that would be cool. Even though I don't own any 4K equipment yet. It might incenticize some of us to upgrade our equipment, if we could get a new PU membership badge.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A low-cost entry to a massive amount of teen porn. On holiday specials, you can join for around $48/year (including downloads).
-Unlimited streaming and downloads for most memberships. Formerly, they didn't include downloads for this site (that was accurate 2 years ago). But they now allow unlimited downloads for most memberships. You need to check whether the membership you are signing up for includes downloads or not.
-You can stream the videos on your desktop, tablet, mobile or tv.
-The site has over 1500 models. Mainly from Eastern Europe, but also some from the United States.
-Videos usually run around 20-30 minutes.
-Some of the acting is actually good. Normally, I cringe watching stupid teen porn videos, because the plots are so foolish, but the models do a pretty good job acting like innocent girls until the stunt cocks start to turn them on, and then it's standard teen suck-lick-fuck with some really attractive teen girls.
Cons:
-Content and channels are subject to change. So if you find some videos you really like, it's best to download them to keep (assuming your membership includes downloads-which is the best way to go: there's little reason to choose a streaming only membership, since you can find streaming + download membership for an even lower price).
-Very limited information about the models. Which can be wrong. Lana Rhoades is listed as a Czech Republic porn star, even though most sites state she was born in the US. Actually, they list most of their models as Czech, no matter where they come from.
-Default file title rarely includes name of the model, or the site it came from. So you have to manually rename these files.
-I haven't found the zip files for the photos sets yet. The video download is easy to find, but if there is a zip file for the photo sets, I will have to contact customer support.
Bottom Line:
-I don't know if you call this a site or a network or a porn aggregator.
The structure is that they get anywhere from 3 to hundreds of videos from about 98 different sites.
Many of the sites you won't recognize, even if you have you have extensive experience with teen porn sites.
But you also get content from sites you probably recognize: Vipissy, ItsPOV, Club Sweethearts, Wet & Puffy, Analized, I Kiss Girls, We Like To Suck, Private Casting-X, and a bunch of other sites you will find familiar.
So you get a wide variety of porn teen niches.
For a very low price.
Wait for a holiday special, when they offer dirt-cheap memberships. And then play around with the join page, since they often offer different prices for the same membership.
By playing around, I mean, look at the price offered, then start to switch to a different site, and see if they offer you a lower price for the different memberships.
I joined for a lifetime membership for $150, including unlimited streaming and downloads. But the first offer was $300 for the same membership.
I also saw a yearly membership with streaming only for about $60, but they also offer a yearly membership for about $48 that includes streaming and downloads. I'm not talking about different times of the year, but the offers on a single day(normally during holiday specials).
What do you get?
Over 2000 videos.
Over 1500 models, many of which you might recognize if you are into Eastern European teen porn.
Daily updates.
24/7 customer support. (I haven't tried customer support yet this time. Didn't bother using customer support my previous membership, since I never had a problem with the site.)
The site structure is basically easy to use. You can search for the models you like (which is time-consuming, since you have over 800 models), or you can sample videos from different studios (they call porn sites studios), or just browse
You can like/dislike and create playlists.
The content is basically teen-oriented porn, but it covers many different niches.
For a very low price, you get access (unlimited streaming + downloads) to a wide variety of content from many teen porn sites.
Most of the videos offered include 480p and 1080p options.
You can join for a one-month special for around $4, to see what the site has to offer, and then decide whether you want to take a longer-term membership.
I think the site offers a lot of good content for a very low price.
I just realized that the link that states "Download this video" is due to Internet Download Manager, a payable download manager.
The download option is not from the site itself, but from the download manager I am using.
Sorry for the confusion.
The link to download just pops up on my desktop, and I thought it was the site that was allowing me downloads.
But it was the Internet Download Manager program that was providing the link, and the ability to download videos from this site (and from other sites, as well).
I should re-write my review of this site.
All the professional reviews of this site state the site is streaming only, no downloads allowed.
I don't know if this is a recent change, but downloads are allowed at the site. With a regular membership. You don't have to pay extra for downloads.
Just find the link that says, "Download this video", and you can use a download manager to download.
That increases the value of the site significantly.
I plan to rewrite my review, as soon as I find the time.
But I did edit the review, to show that downloads are allowed, with a regular membership, for no extra charge.
And increased the site score to 93.
The site is not perfect, but for a very low price, you are given access to 3000+ hardcore videos covering a wide range of niches.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Note:
I want to explain that I am being easy in this review because I paid a low membership price.
Some PU members think that membership price should either not be mentioned in a review, or else considered as a minor factor.
I disagree.
The membership price is a major factor for this site, because you are paying a low fee to access over 3000 hardcore videos, over 1100 models. The site is certainly not perfect, but the operators are working to improve the site, as well as giving you a wide range of hardcore niches.
That slant colors this review.
If you don't agree that price can be a major factor in the value of a site, then you should probably ignore the review.
PROS(START OF):
-The main pro is the low membership price.
There is a PU discount for $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $14.95/month.
I believe there are holiday discounts for even lower prices.
-The network is like a tiny Adult Time network: you get access to 3015 hardcore videos and 1136 models.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The videos come from over 70 different sites, so it's like a sampling of those sites. For a very low price, you should be able to find plenty of videos to watch.
-Most or all of the video content is available in hd quality.
-The site is easy to navigate, and you can search by site, category, tags, model name, video title, etc. They also list the sites offered, plus categories.
-Members can leave comments on scenes.
-You can have a favorites list, which is useful with over 3000 videos to search and choose from.
-You can also make your own personal play list.
-Epoch, Vendo and Segpay are the billers, which are first rate and dependable.
-Can pay with a credit card, paypal, or crypto.
-There is a model listing.
-With over 70 sites contributing, the number of niches offered is large:
teen, MILF, masturbation, handjobs, solo, twosomes, group sex, straight fucking, anal, fisting, lesbian, blow jobs, peeing, spy glasses, cuckolds, stocking fetish, dildos and other toys.
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Good update rate. 22 videos added this week.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-A special way to improve your account security. You can choose to enable two-factor authentification. If enabled, you will be emailed a unique code each time you try to login to the site. The code will allow you to enter the members area. Seems like over-kill to me.
CONS(START OF):
-The main con is this network is streaming only. No downloads.
-By default, it shows your user ID if you make a comment. The user ID is your email address. So create a nickname before your make any comments on the videos, or else you are exposing your email address.
-Only some content is dated. So you can't tell what the update rate is.
The public page often tells you how many new videos were added to the network in the current week.
Also, I believe the dating process started recently, so most of the content is not dated.
-Cancelling could be easier. You can submit a ticket asking to cancel. But I think it's easier to cancel through your biller. So save your confirmation emails.
-The content is non-exclusive. If you're into porn, you've probably seen a lot of the content featured at this network.
-Videos often don't list the names of the models in the video.
-Many videos are in a foreign language, with no subtitles. But the dialogue is usually unimportant in this type of hardcore.
-Videos often lack tags, a text description, or a trailer.
Edit: Hit the "Show More" link to bring up the brief text description, tags, model name, etc.
But many videos don't show the model name, even after hitting the "Show More" link.
-Most videos have a choice of 480p and 1080p. Which is OK, but not great.
-I tried joining through Vendo, but was rejected several times. Then I tried to join through Epoch, and was accepted the first try. Vendo had no pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. Epoch did have a pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Network stats
Videos: 3012
Video runtime varies: from 20 minutes to about 1 hour.
Models: 1136
Contributing sites: 70+
Photo sets: 295
Number of photos per set: 100+
-This is a streaming-only network.
So there are two main ways to use it:
1. A low-cost intro to over 70 different sites, to see which sites you might want to join.
2. A low-cost source of hardcore videos, from a wide variety of niches, from a wide variety of sites (over 70 different sites have contributed content to this network).
For a low price of $10 or less for the first month, this site is worth joining to see how many videos you want to watch. There are no downloads. But if you like what you find, and there's plenty of content from a wide variety of niches, a low-cost year's membership might make sense. Because there's no way you can sample over 3000 videos in a month or even a few months.
I know that most PU members want downloading privileges to join a site.
But some of the low prices I've seen for a year's membership make this a worthwhile join.
rabbitsreviews lists a first year membership of $48, which seems cheap as dirt.
(PU lists a first year membership of $60. So go with the rabbitsreviews discount.)
Consider this site as a low-rent version of most hardcore porn sites, except that it's not the low-rent that many hardcore sites were around 2000 or earlier: the videos are mainly acceptable or OK, not the high gloss videos at the Wow sites, the X-Art site, the Blacked-Tushy-Vixen sites. It's a trade-off: you're paying a low price, and getting a lower-quality hardcore product, but not the cheap videos made around 2000 with cheap sets, cheap production values, poor lighting.
The site has plenty of ads. You can ignore them, or you might find some of the ads have a low price that's worth considering.
I'm giving the site a score 93.
For a low price, you're getting access to some good content. But it depends on your willingness to scan through a lot of material that won't appeal to your individual tastes.
Edit:
I have downloaded videos from this site. The downloads were done through a shareware download manager, not from the site's function. My mistake. Reducing the site score to 90.
I just started using the download manager, and didn't realize I was using the program to do downloads. Thought I was using the site software, until I realized the download link was popping up for other sites, as well at the Filth Flix site.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The stand-alone Filthy POV site is streaming only. But the Adult Time channel for Filthy POV has both unlimited streaming and unlimited downloading (if you have downloading privileges with your membership in Adult Time).
-The stand-alone Filthy POV site content is supposed to be exclusive. But the Adult Time channel for Filthy POV has some content from other sites mixed in, so it's not entirely exclusive.
-All scenes are available in 360p SD through 1080p. And they are now offering 4K definition for people with ultra-high definition monitors.
-Some scenes might have a plot that adds to the interest: A brother might blackmail his stepsister into having sex. However, many of the videos at the Filthy POV channel seem to have the plot cut out, and the scenes start with off with hardcore sex, with no buildup.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Some videos have an accompanying phtoset. But the photoset is poor-quality screen shots: poor lighting, cheap sets, a limited number of screen shots per set. Not worth collecting, even when the model is cute.
-Photosets average around 15 screenshots per set.
-The level of attractiveness of the models is below average. The site is going for a trailer-trash vibe, not presenting the models as attractive women, but as sluts who are getting banged.
-There is no text description of a video.
-There are no tags to describe or define the video.
-Little to none model info.
Bottom Line:
124 videos currently.
Video runtime is from 10 to 20 minutes. My guess is that they've edited the original videos to cut out the build-up to the sex, and start many of the videos with the sex scenes. Which is both good and bad: good, for fans who want to skip the buildup and view the hardcore sex. Bad, because the the buildup could give meaning to the sex.
Without the plot build-up, the scene is just two or more bodies having sex, with very little meaning.
You have Dixie Lynn, Sofie Reyez, Karah Brooke, Jocelyn Stone, Melody Marks, cute or attractive girls, sucking cock, but there's no basis for the sex, and it gets boring fast.
I much prefer the Jays POV channel in Adult Time, which makes an effort of selecting cute teen models, and also includes a plot build-up where the stunt cock seduces the girls into having sex, or the girl seduces the guy.
The sets and costumes at Jays POV are nicer, not trying for the trailer trash vibe.
The lighting and colors of the videos at Jays POV are brighter, and the girls look so much better.
Filthy POV is a channel in the Adult Time network.
It's also a standalone site.
I'm writing about the Filthy POV channel in the Adult Time network.
Which apparently has a lot of the video content found in the separate Filthy POV site.
Note: some of the videos that are listed under the Filthy POV channel are originally from other sites.
A few from FilthyKings, RoccoSiffredi, Spizzo.com.
But most of the content is from the FilthyPOV site.
Most of the models are white, but you get some latina, some black.
Most of the models are probably in their twenties, but you get some teens, some grannies.
These models are not selected for their looks, unless you consider trailer trash as the target look.
You get a wide variety of themes in this channel, and a wide variety of female performers.
The overall theme is trailer trash: slutty models, young and old, who are showing the dirty side of sex.
Fake incest: step-relations having sex. Teen and twenty-something models having sex with young and older guys. Grannies. Lots of models with tats. Cuckold. Punishment. Blowjobs. Anal. Oversized titties. Whatever.
The models are basically shown as sluts who like their sex down and dirty.
No attempt is made to make the models attractive or glamorous.
There are a few cute teen models in the catalog who seem to have wandered into the site by mistake, but
they show they belong in this site because they have fake-incest with their step family or show other perversions.
If you're into dirty sex, perverted sex, then you can watch in 4K video, which should satisfy connoisseurs of raw hardcore porn.
I'm giving the Filthy POV channel a score of 78. I don't appreciate the trailer-trash vibe of the site.
I don't like the editing that cuts out the build-up to the sex.
I like my models to be young and attractive, and the models at this site are basically a much less attractive group of women than the Jays POV models.
The plots at Jays POV site can be repetitious, but the models are yummy, and the sets and lighting are clean.
The sets at Filthy POV are cheap, the models are presented at sluts, the lighting is dim.
If you are satisfied with 3 hits for a redhead model, then the site will give you what you want.
Especially since it includes an emphasis on anal.
But I think the Teen Mega World network, which has one site emphasizing anal, and other sites that include some anal play, might be a better fit.
The Teen Mega World network search is poor: it returns lots of hits that are not related to the search terms entered.
But the page for the model index listing is the best way to search for a model's content at TMW (Teen Mega World).
Lately, the PU site seems more like a ghost town than an active site.
Is that the result of the virus?
I've read that internet activity has zoomed because of the virus, with people forced to stay home more.
I very rarely use the site or network.
I do have a VPN, but don't use it much.
Mainly because I have Netflix, and Netflix won't allow me to use the service if my VPN is enabled.
So, to make a long story short (I tend to ramble a lot), I almost never used the VPN while entering the 18Videoz network.
Can't be sure if I ever used it, but if I did, it was rarely.
So I don't think it was the VPN.
I could have been hacked, because the site and network pages are not secure, and the browser gives you a warning popup every time you login that the login is not secure and could be hacked.
I was surprised when I got the message my account was blocked.
But getting a new password was easy. Very fast. Just entered my email, received a new password at my email address right away, and was granted access immediately.
So not a problem.
It's just that I feel much better on sites that are https (secure), so I don't have to worry about hacking.
Using a VPN can cause problems.
I was declined a few times when trying to sign up to porn sites, because I was using a VPN, and the software "found" my internet address did not match the location on my credit card.
That's what a customer service rep told me when I called and asked why my credit card was declined.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-You can sometimes find a low-priced membership of around $60 for 1 year.
-A lot of cute models at the site and network.
-Videos offered in your choice of definition:
Download from mobile up to 4K.
Streaming offered in 240p, 720p, 1080p.
-Video runtime around 25-30 minutes, so easy to watch.
-Sex is basic, with oral, vaginal, anal.
-You get access to around 15+ sites in the network.
-Network has 3246 videos, 2256 models.
-Site has 182 videos.
Cons:
-Archive site. Last update was May 29, 2020. Before that, the update rate was 1 or 2 videos per month.
-Login and member pages are not secure, so prone to hacking. A few days ago, I got a message my account was blocked, due to password sharing. I've never shared my password with anyone. I don't know if the account was hacked, or it's just a glitch with the site server.
-Navigation is poor. Multiple reasons for this:
-The search engine is messed up.
-1. It only returns a minimal number of hits if you enter a phrase such as "redhead model".
I got 3 hits. Surely, there are more than 3 redheaded models at the site and network.
2. The search engine freezes your search term. After entering the phrase "redhead model", I tried entering a different phrase to search for. The seach engine returned the previous search, "redhead model", and wouldn't search for a new phrase. Even when I logged out of the site and re-logged in, and tried use the search for a different phrase, the site still showed me
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
"redhead model" as my search term.
I don't know what to call it, except messed up. And worthless.
3. They have a model listing, but it's only for the network, not for the site.
And they mix in the stunt cocks in the model listing. So you have to manually page through thousands of mdoels in the model listing to find the models you might like. Which takes a lot of time. The model thumbnails are small and not flattering to the models, and the thumbnails for the individual videos are small and not flattering to the models, which decreases your interest in the videos.
It's just a poor presentation of the site and network.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Network advertises "most beautiful amateur girls ultimate hardcore action".
But that is standard porn hype. Many of these girls are Eastern European models you've seen at many different porn sites. And I wouldn't call the action the ultimate hardcore. If you want over-the-top hardcore, visit Rocco Siffredi, or the Porn Fidelity sites.
-The photosets download in only 1 file definition. But the quality is just OK to poor. The photos are more like screen caps. What is surprising is the size of the downloaded photoset. Around 245 MB for a photoset of 102 photos. MetArt's high grade high definition photos are in that size range, and First Anal Date's photos are more like screen caps than real photos, so I don't know why the First Anal Date photos are so large.
The First Anal Date photosets are not worth collecting, even when the model is cute, because the quality of the photos is poor.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
In spite of a number of attractive models, the site does not impress me much.
The videos seem like home-shot videos, even though they are probably professionally shot.
The sets are just OK, not as nice as what you find at many competing teen hardcore sites.
Stats:
Videos: 182 videos.
Video runtime: 20-30 minutes.
Photosets: around 100 pics per set.
Photoset size: around 245 MB.
Photo quality: poor.
I would rather spend a few more dollars and get a membership in a porn site/network that will give me better quality content. It's not the attractiveness of the models, but the overall impression of watching home-made sex videos that is poor.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They are working constantly to update and improve the site and network.
-They did a recent update for the network public page, making the page brighter and more inviting.
The network public page shows nice-sized thumbnails for latest videos, featured videos, newest girls,
-As part of the Teen Mega World network, you get access to 33 teen porn sites. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-The network updates around 5 days a week, with exclusive content.
-The site (and some of the network) has 4K videos, as well as lower definition videos.
-The site (and some of the network) has high resolution images.
-Navigation is easy. It's easy to switch between sites in the network.
-PU has a discounted price of $14.95/month recurring.
-Unlimited downloads.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Although this is not a glamour site or network, the girls are basically white teens who are attractive.
Cons:
-If you join through the main TMW site, the search returns content from the entire network.
However, if you join through one of the other sites in the network, the search returns only content from the site you joined through. So do yourself a favor, and join through the main TMW site.
-I think they did a recent update on the search engine and messed it up. Assume you log in through the TMW site, and not the First BGG site. You enter the name "Lolly Small" in the search. What you are returned is a huge number of hits, most of which have nothing to do with Lolly Small. The search for "Lolly Small" returns 301 results. And Lolly Small only has 10 videos at the network.
I've been a continuous member of the network for over 3 years now, and the search at the TMW site used to be good, returning only results that matched the model's name.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Login and member pages are non-secure. Not https. So easy to hack.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Although the network has a daily update, the update rate for the site is approximately 1 per month.
2018-11-27 the site had 110 videos.
2020-03-17 the site has 121 videos.
So over time, the update rate is less than 1 per month.
The reason for the slow update rate for the site is that updates are spread over the network, so the BGG site gets less than 1 new video plus matching photo set per month.
Which is more than acceptable, since there is a huge amount of teen content in the network to look through.
-Vendo is the billing agent. Not as familiar as CCBill or Epoch. But I've used Vendo many times, and never had a problem. So I'm listing it as a minor con, but it's not really a con. I've used Vendo for WowGirls, DDF Network, Ultra Films, Lust Week, etc.
-Many of the sites are archive sites, that haven't updated in years. The quality of the archive sites is definitely less than the current output of videos and photosets. Some of the archive sites do not have streaming; you have to download the video or photo set to see it.
-The photosets have a zip file, but it's only in 1 definition, not low, medium and high.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site theme: One guy on two girls. Forget love, these girls are interested in sex. And they are willing to share a guy.
Site stats:
videos: 121
photo sets: 121
As you might be able to tell, TMW is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks.
This review is on First BGG, but I believe the details on the TMW network, of which First BGG is part of, can be helpful.
What I like about the site and network:
The models are mainly attractive young teens, who put on a good show: they seem to enjoy the sex.
The models are real teens. Not a lot of fake boobs. Not a lot of tattoos.
This is not a glam site or network.
The network started around 2005.
The site (First BGG) started around 2011.
The network started out as a low-rent teen hardcore collection of sites.
Over time, they have spent a lot of time, effort and money into upgrading the network and included
sites.
For the last few years, you can stream or download the most recent videos in 360p up to 2160p.
The upgrades included:
With a membership in any site in the network, you now get access to all the sites (currently 33 sites.)
Better equipment for filming and photographing, better, more expensive sets, better costumes (the costumes are street clothes, but better street clothes than what they used to wear), better lighting, sound control.
The videos and photo sets from the last few years are excellent quality: not glamcore, but still excellent quality.
The quality obviously gets worse as you look at the older material.
First BGG is part of the TMW network. TMW is one of my favorite teen hardcore network. I wouldn't say that First BGG is one of the top sites in the network, but it is a worthwhile addition to the network.
I'm giving the site a score of 90. That is basically because joining any site in the network gives you access to the entire network.
If I had to score the First BGG by itself, without network access, the score would be much lower.
But it's still a good site, with 121 videos and matching photosets.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network. You can usually find a holiday special of $60/year. The regular price with a PU discount is $120.
-New Sensations has around 15 sites. You get access to all the sites, none require a premium upgrade.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Login is easy if you have cookies enabled. No captcha or other problems.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-They did a network update, and made the public page and member pages refreshed with bigger thumbnails that makes the network and sites more appealing.
-A lot of attractive models. You can find loads of attractive models at many hard and soft porn sites. I can't say these models are exceptional, but many are attractive to very attractive.
-You can stream videos, or download them, in 720p, 1080p, 4K in 2 different bit rates for each definition.
-Content is exclusive.
Cons:
-Last update was in February 2021.
-A page of ads when you log in, before you get to the member's area.
-Ads on every member page.
-The plots are mainly simplistic. Most porn stars/models are not very good actors. So you're depending on the model's good looks and acting ability to create some heat. Some models are fine actors, or they have some chemistry that jumps off the monitor to make a photo or video have heat.
-Lots of toy use. That's a plus or minus, depending on your personal preference. Hitachi wand (the big-sized vibrator) and Sybian saddle (a vibrating dildo that a woman can ride) in different videos.
-A fair number of the videos are interview of the models. Again, a plus or minus, depending on your personal preference. If I like a model, I'm more interested in her interview.
Bottom Line:
Site theme is lesbians having sex.
I think the plots are minimal. Many of the plots involve sex between a younger woman and an older woman (older woman in her late 30s or 40s). Many of the older women have breast implants.
Ivy Wolfe is a slut. I think she retired from porn in 2018. Cute face, slender body. She can put on a show. When I say "slut", I don't mean to be dis-respectful. I'm teasing. Ivy is lovely (she's more like cute or slightly pretty) and fucking hot.
Compare her to Alya Stark (aka Arya Stark), who is physically lovely, but her porn scenes are more sensual, not the same eroticism or heat, but Alya Stark is so gorgeous, you just want to kiss and lick and fuck that gorgeous face and body for hours.
Both models put on a show that's believable, and the models really seem to be getting off.
Note: Ivy Wolfe appears in Four Finger Club and HotWifeXXX.
Alya Stark does not appear in New Sensations, but I used her an example of a lovely young model (physically) who puts on a wonderful show.
Some of the videos have really attractive women.
And the videos can be slow, sensual, fun. Watch Eden Arya (aka Eden Addams) and Riley Nixon having some fun. Video titled "Eden's Trust Riley Will Take It Further", posted 08/18/2017.
Bottom line: there are plenty of cute or attractive models at the site.
And many of the videos are definitely worth watching.
You just have to sort through to find the videos that appeal to you.
The main benefit of the site is that it's part of the New Sensations network, which has a lot of attractive models, and a lot of videos and photosets that are worth examining.
I don't think this is one of the better lesbian sites, because I don't enjoy too many of the videos. But that's just me. If you personally enjoy more of the videos, then the site will have more value for you.
But I definitely think the site (and the network) are worth joining. Especially if you can find a $60/year membership.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network.
-Membership in the network gives you access to all the sites in the network, for no additional charge.
-Membership in the network gives you unlimited downloads and unlimited streaming.
-The videos at the network are mainly professionally shot: clear, crisp images, good colors, good sound control, nice costumes (mainly normal street clothes).
Cons:
-Erratic update rate.
-Ads on every member page, take away from the useful screen content.
-Popup window of ads also hides part of the screen.
-Navigation is poor. Hard to get a simple listing of the videos at the Fresh Outta High School site.
Bottom Line:
I think the site (and network) is a worthwhile join at $60/year, if you can find it listed for a holiday special.
That's the price I joined for.
But lately, I've seen prices of $95.45/year on a holiday special, or even $149.95/year.
Which is a ripp-off, in my opinion. There are far better sites at those price points: better navigation, better quality content, a wider selection of models.
The content at Fresh Outta High School (and the New Sensations Network) is good quality hardcore porn, but there are better networks that will give you not only a wider selection of high quality porn, a more extensive selection of models, and content that is easier to use. In both the softcore and hardcore areas.
New Sensations has been around for over 20 years.
They've created a large amount of exclusive content: over 7,000 scenes, over 2,500 porn stars, with sites covering different niches.
But the internet is vast, and has thousands of competing sites for porn.
I would not put New Sensations, or the Fresh Outta High School site, as one of the stars of the internet.
But for a low membership price, I think it's worth sampling. And maybe even a longer join, if you enjoy the site (and network).
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network, a low cost ($60/year) network of quality videos and photosets.
-The short text description of the video is a fine summary of the plot.
-Easy to switch between the sites in the network.
-I don't know why, but looking at the nice-sized thumbnails of the models laying on their backs, or crouching with their ass sticking up in the air, is enough to give you a hard-on, even before you get to the video. Some of these teen models are fucking attractive.
-Watching these videos is a wonderful guide on how to treat young women. Be a man and be strong, so you can give her the hardest cock she's ever tasted, and ram it deep into her tight young holes.
-The good-looking models are always so enthusiastic and verbal about the joys of fucking. Possibly a little over-the-top, but it gives me hope that I can find some cuties to satisfy my needs.
-The school uniforms the girls wear (plaid skirt, white blouse), brings back memories of the Catholic school girls.
Cons:
-You find a video at New Sensations network, it's not immediately apparent which site the video belongs to.
-The title of the site is "FreshOuttaHighSchool". But some models look like in their early 20s. You graduate from high school at 17 or 18.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-I don't think the plots are 100% accurate to real-life situations. In the videos, lovely young girls are always coming on to older men to satisfy their sexual urges. In real life, it seems to me that young girls are not always so willing and able to have sex without some urging on the part of the male partners.
-Very little information is given about the models. You get a nice, extra-large thumbnail of the model to see what she looks like, but no bio or personal data other than height and measurements (height-chest-hips).
-Maybe it's my slow wifi connection, but the video streaming was spotty, with lots of pauses while streaming videos.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-I wish some of the cuties would make more than one appearance at the site. Riley Reid, Bailey Brooke, and other cuties deserve to be showcased more often, so we can appreciate their lovely bodies and fine acting skills.
-The default file name lists the model, but you need to add the date posted, site, and any other data you need.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site is a nice addition to the New Sensations network.
The site theme is young girls having sex. Often with older men. The older men are usually hesitant to have sex with the girls. The girls are young and attractive, so I don't know why the older men are so hesitant.
Also, the young girls are uniformly cute or attractive, but they are also so horny, that as soon as the men touch them, the girls start moaning and screaming and shouting they are going to come. Is that the way it happens in real life?
Enquiring minds want to know: are the videos at New Sensations teaching us to behave properly in the real world, or are these videos fantasies from perverted male minds?
I was brought up to believe we should always give the benefit of the doubt to people, when there is a question of honor. So I think that New Sensations is giving us videos that will teach us to behave honorably towards women, to give women what they've always secretly craved: a good, stiff cock right where it counts.
The older videos have 720p and 1080p definitions for streaming and downloading, but 4K was not introduced until 2018.
The streaming have 2 choices for bit rates.
The older downloads might only have 1 choice for bit rates.
But many downloads have multiple choices for bit rates, for each definition offered.
The videos and photosets have fine technical qualities and are a pleasure to watch: nice sets, excellent colors and lighting, professional camera-work, attractive models, good sound control, etc.
The main factor, after checking to see that the videos are good technical quality, is how cute or attractive are the models.
The models at FreshOuttaHighSchool (and at New Sensations network) are scrumptious.
There are plenty of models to drool over.
Cute, attractive, lovely, there are plenty of good-looking young women that should appeal to you.
The main selling points of the site:
-low membership price: $60/year.
-high quality videos and photosets.
-access to the New Sensations network, of 7,500+ scenes.
-Thousands of A-list pornstars that are attractive.
-Easy site and network navigation.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
Not sure why you have stopped leaving reviews.
Your reviews were worthwhile because they gave your own thoughts on sites, which could be useful or informative.
As a bonus, your reviews could earn you tickets for the monthly raffle.
A review takes more time to write than a comment, but you might want to re-think your position about writing reviews.
Just my opinion, of course. You're the one who decides about writing reviews.
Whether it's worth the time and effort.
Maybe you could suggest a prize to Freddie for best Waffle Review of the Month?
I was trying to be clear, to show exactly how the search works at the network sites.
The difference between the main Teen Mega World site, and the satellite site searches.
But as you pointed out, I didn't cover every detail.
I did a couple of reviews recently about some TMW sites, where I mistakenly wrote that the limited search at the sites had been fixed. That was an error. I was probably logged in to the main TMW site when I did those searches, and didn't carefully look at the browser address bar, that would show what site I was logged into.
To describe the A-Z model listing at the TMW site, and the satellite sites: It's not simple.
If you are logged in to the main TMW site, then a model listing (with thumbnails of the models) is shown. Which takes several pages.
If you click on a model's thumbnail, it brings up a listing (with thumbnails) of the model's content at the network. Click on any thumbnail and it will bring up the model's video at the specific site.
If you are logged in to one of the satellite sites: the model listing only shows the models that are at that site.
However, (still assuming you are logged in to one of the satellite sites): the model listing, once you click on a model's thumbnail, will bring up her content at the entire network, with thumbnails.
So you can click on any thumbnail, to bring up the video of that model at thosw sites.
So, if you joined through one of the satellite sites, searching for a model's content, whether by the search engine, or by the A-Z model listing, will be an incomplete search of most models at the network.
And most of the network content will be a mystery.
Unless you do a very laborious search of each site by:
doing a partial log-in to each site, and then viewing the model listing for that site.
(I say it's a partial log-in, because once you join a site, any time you log in to the TMW network, you are only logged in to your join site, even when you open a different site in the network, you are still logged in to your join site.
Sorry if I am waffling. But I am trying to be precise, and trying to give you a complete picture.
Maybe you aren't thinking.
The most important fact about joining Fuck Studies is that you should not join the site directly.
You should join through the Teen Mega World site.
The difference is that a search from Teen Mega World covers the entire network.
A search (if you join through Fuck Studies, or one of the other satellite sites in the network) is limited to the site you join through.
If you are not aware of this difference, and join through one of the satellite sites, such as Fuck Studies, then your ability to search the network content is severely limited.
If you can't appreciate that idea, that's your problem.
I think I'm doing a service by pointing out the difference in which site to join through.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Warning: if you are going to join the Teen Mega World network, I strongly recommend that you join through the Teen Mega World network site. And not through one of the satellite sites.
The reason is simple: If you join through the Teen Mega World site directly, your search for a model's content returns her content at the entire network.
But if you join through one of the satellite sites, your search for a model's content is limited to her content at the site you joined with.
This means, finding what the model's content at other sites would be a difficult, time-consuming effort.
And that recommdation is worth the entire review, by itself.
The network did an update several years ago, where they changed the search engine to:
if you join through TMW site directly, your search covers the entire network.
if you join through one of the TMW network sites, your search is limited to the site you joined through.
Cons:
WARNING(CONTINUED):
So, unless you are willing to spend hours trying to find what sites the model has content at, and then trying to access that content, which would involve logging to the site, then clicking through the thumbnail pages to find the page (or pages) where her content was listed, most of the content at TMW would be unavailable, because it takes too much time and effort to find it.
I find it amazing that no PU members have complained about the limited search at the TMW satellite sites over the last few years.
Maybe it's because few members have joined the TMW sites, or have written reviews about the TMW sites, in the last few years.
TMW has been kind enough to give me a separate membership to TMW, because of the navigation difficulties I am describing, with my Teen Sex Movs membership.
I have an annual membership to Teen Sex Movs, which I've kept for a few years now.
But my search with the Teen Sex Movs membership is limited to that site, does not cover the TMW network.
Bottom Line:
WARNING(CONTINUED):
So if you want to find content at the site you have opened, you can't use the search: you have to page through the thumbnails of the site videos. Using the search will only return content from your join site, even when you have opened up a different site to explore.
I am puzzled why no other PU members have commented on the search problems at the TMW sites.
Because the search problems started years ago, and have never been fixed.
PROS(START OF): Fuck Studies is part of the Teen Mega World network (also known as TMW).
The Teen Mega World network is one of my favorite hardcore networks.
Most of the teen models are real teens (when they start out).
The average model is cute or attractive. And they have some teens that are more than just attractive: they are lovely to beautiful.
-Video definitions offered in multiple definitions, including 4K (UHD).
-Can stream or download, with no limits.
-Easy to switch between sites in the network.
-You get access to the entire network with a subscription to any one of the sites. But you should join through the TMW site itself, for search and access to the content. Otherwise, finding the content of specific models would be a time-consuming task.
-You get access to over 30 sites with a join to any site in the network, covering a wide variety of teen niches.
-The network has over 5,000 videos, and over 2,000 models.
-Cons
-If you join through one of the network sites other than the main TMW site itself, your search only returns content from the site you joined through. That applies even when you open a different site in the network (you are still logged in to your join site).
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The site only updates one new video per month. However, the network updates every 1 or 2 days.
-Vendo is the billing agent. This is a proprietary biller. But I've joined many times using this biller, and never had a problem.
BOTTOM LINE:
If you join through one of the satellite sites, your search is limited to the site you join through.
If you join through the main TMW site itself, your search covers the entire network.
Thus, if you join through a satellite site, you will not be able to find the content of any model except at your join site.
That means:
1. You won't know what content the model has at the network.
2. Even if you spend the time to search for which sites in the network have that model's content, accessing the content is a time-consuming task: because you have to open each specific site itself, and then page through the thumbnail listings to find where her content is listed, and then bring up the video or photoset.
3. On the other hand, if you join through the main TMW site, the search lists the model's content for the entire network, with hot links to her content. So it's easy to find--and access--her content.
Bottom line: If you join through the main TMW site itself, I would give the Fuck Studies site a score of 93. Because it's then easy to find and access the content of each model.
But if you join through Fuck Studies, or one of the TMW satellite sites, I would give the Fuck Studies site a score of 70.
Because, unless you write to the TMW support staff, and they give you a free TMW site membership, it's too time-consuming to find or access the content at the network.
The TMW network is one of my favorite networks for hardcore teen porn.
But I believe the network is shooting itself in the foot with the limited search at its satellite sites. I believe they have lost a lot of customer business because of the poor search function.
They need to re-write the network code, to allow each site to have a search that covers the entire network.
A membership in any one of the sites gives you access to the entire network.
But since the search is limited to your join site, actually finding what the content includes, and then trying to access the content you want to view, is a time-consuming task.
Unless you have joined through the main TMW site itself.
I've said that TMW is one of my favorite hardcore teen networks.
That is because the models are real teens.
And they mainly range from attractive to very attractive.
The girls put on a show where they appear to really enjoy getting off.
So it's a pleasure watching these videos.
And each video has a matching photo set, that is nice quality.
(I assume the photo sets were made from some software program, but the photos are good quality:
nice focus, nicely centered, good lighting, etc.)
So, I'm giving the site a score of 93, because you get access to the entire network, with unlimited streaming and downloading.
But if you are unlucky enough to join through one of the satellite sites, it would be a massive task to find the content at the network.
Unless you ask their support team for a membership to the TMW site itself, which is what I've done for the last few years.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Dirty Flix network of around 12 sites. Join any site, you get access to all the network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-No pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. But check to be sure, because it's very unusual for a join page not to have at least one pre-checked cross-sale.
-On videos, they give you both mp4 and wmv file formats. The newer videos have mp4 definition for mobile devices, on up to 4K.
-Navigation is basic but adequate.
-You have tags and category labels to describe the videos, but no plot summary. Except there's not much plot. You have a guy, a girl, and they have sex.
Cons:
-The default for the login page and the member pages are not secure. But if you put "https" (without the quotation marks) in front of the login page, or if you go directly to the member page and put that "https" in the address bar, your login and the member pages will be secure.
-The level of attractiveness of the models is sub-par for a hardcore porn site. At least, the porn sites that I subscribe to.
-Regular price is expensive: $30/month, or $120/year. But you can find holiday specials for $60/year. The holiday specials are for the dirty flix network, which includes the Fucking Glasses site. Normally, if you want to save money, search for a discount to the network, not an individual site in the network. It's much easier finding discounts to the network name, instead of a discount to one of the network sites.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-One problem with porn sites are the names. You join enough sites, all the names start to seem the same. I'm a member of Dirty Flix. Also a member of Filth Flix, which are competing sites.
The same people who run (or own?) Dirty Flix also run 18 Videoz, and both Dirty Flix and 18 Videoz share some of the same video content. Both Dirty Flix and 18 Videoz focus on hardcore teen porn.
-Videos have an accompanying photoset, that you can download. But almost all the photosets are made of screencaps, so the quality of the photosets is poor, and they aren't worth collecting.
-The sound track for the video goes in and out. So it doesn't match what the actors are saying. Not a big deal, since the dialog is basically bullshit, but it just adds to the cheap impression of the video.
-Ads for other sites on every member page. Standard for porn sites. But since a lot of the site videos seem boring, you click on the ads of attractive models for other sites, but don't join, since the ads don't offer attractive discounts.
-The site has 123 movies. So it's a small site.
-The update rate is very irregular.
The most recent video was posted Feb 28, 2020.
Before that, you would get 2 or 3 videos in a year.
-The camera focus is often poor. They need a better camera operator to film these videos.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site theme is a guy who has a camera concealed in his glasses is secretly filming his pickups. So this is supposed to be voyeur sex. Which gives you chills when you realize the girls getting fucked are unaware they are being filmed (Sarcasm. You're supposed to enjoy the video more because the girl supposedly doesn't know the encounter is being filmed.).
I'm giving the site a score of 75.
The cons outweigh the pros.
A small site. Last update was Feb 2020. Before that, you would get 2 or 3 new videos per year.
The models are not very attractive. Even when you have an attractive girl, she isn't presented to her best advantage. The way you photograph or video a model can make a tremendous difference in how appealing she appears. And the models at this site just don't appeal to me.
The network is called dirty flix, and that's what the site videos are: cheap sex videos.
I mean, there are some models at the site that are physically very attractive: Alaina Dawson, Inga Zolva, etc. But the videos don't use that physical beauty to make clear, crisp videos with good lighting, good sound control, nice sets, good camera work.
The videos are just low-grade videos. And the photosets are cheap screen cap collections.
So what's the value of the site?
Look at a few videos, and decide if it's worth your time to watch these videos.
I don't think it's worth my time.
I'd rather watch better videos.
Just a thought.
If you have any favorite porn models, you can enter their name in the search box, and see if they have content at this network, that might be available to you.
Try to work off a model listing at the network or one of the sites you enjoy.
It's just an idea, of how you might find content that you enjoy.
The value here is that you don't need to know what sites you have access to, the search should, hopefully, only return content from sites you have access to.
If any content is returned, just click on the thumbnail of the videos you want to watch/examine.
And that should bring up the video that you selected. And also a means of accessing any photoset associated with the video.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
