I'm being nit-picky.
So please excuse the objection, if you want to.
You write "This network was a complete ripoff."
I think you meant to write the "site" was a complete ripoff.
Because you gave the network (Team Skeet) a score of 95, and previously wrote that Team Skeet is one of your favorite networks.
But it's obvious that this part of the Team Skeet network is poor.
And has lots of problems that need to be fixed.
Which are useful objections.
Broken links, non-exclusive content, download limits that are troubling for 4K users, cancellation problems.
So a score of 60 is fair.
And the review serves a worthwhile purpose in pointing out the site problems.
Sir, thanks for checking up on me
My health hasn't been very good lately, so I have been spending a lot less time at the PU site. Getting old, I guess. I'm close to 80.
But a pretty girl is still able to make my heart beat faster.
LOL.
Take care of yourself.
You don't appreciate how important good health is, until it starts to go away.
But I hope I have a few good years left for me, to enjoy the world of porn.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Unlimited streaming and downloading. This is becoming rare in today's porn world, where many sites either limit downloads, or make you pay extra for downloads, or eliminate downloads from some memberships.
-The site features many of the most beautiful women in the world. At one time (back before the internet), this would have been a massive selling point. But with sites like Metart (and it's sister sites), MPL Studios, Femjoy, etc., sites with beautiful women are a commodity. It doesn't take away from the beauty and quality of the models, but it's human nature to devalue what is so freely available.
-However, the quality of the photography is excellent, and easily compares to the best that sites like Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy offer. The attractive models (I downplay the models, because many of these models are equisite and breathtaking and filmed with care) are a delight to look at.
-Site updates 3-4x per week.
-Login is easy if you have cookies enabled.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Payment is easy: You can pay with a credit card (Visa or Mastercard), PayPal, or Crypto. I'm old-fashioned, but if you pay with Crypto, I've read that if you're a US citizen, you will have to include on your income tax report your short-term and long-term cryptocurrency gains and losses on Form 8949. Not reporting all crypto gains and losses is considered tax fraud.
So I'm glad I haven't had this problem yet.
-The mix of women is broader than traditional sites like Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy. You get your normal selection of white models, but you also get a strong element of Black, Indigenous, and people of color. This will be a plus for PU members who are craving something beyond the white models normally seen.
-I don't think of this as a mega-site like Metart or MPL Studios, but there is a large amount of photo sets and videos packed into the site. The layout is easy to navigate. The quality of the images is top-notch. You have hundreds of glamorous girls for your
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):viewing pleasure. Hundreds of lovely girls in thousands of photosets, hundreds of videos of these stunning models, the videos are mainly solo shoots, with the girls moving around and exposing their lovely bodies, having some sexual fun with other female models or masturbating by themselves.
-Listed price is $29.95/month. But PU offers a discount of $14.95 for the first month. Or if you look around, you can probably find a $9.95/month discounted special.
Hundreds of lovely girls in thousands of photosets, hundreds of videos of these stunning models, the videos are mainly solo shoots, with the girls moving around and exposing their lovely bodies, having some sexual fun with other female models or masturbating by themselves.
CONS(START 0F):
-I think the cons are basically minor for the site.
-Personally, I'm not a big fan of tattoos on women. But it's becoming more and more common over the years. And many of the Watch4Beauty models are into tattoos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Normal for almost all porn sites.
-My biggest con is that I wish there was more content of most of my favorite models at the site. Some models do one or two shoots, and then move on to other web sites.
-Years ago there used to be a few bonus sites, but they dropped them. However, the site contents is well worth the money to join, if you are into lovely young women stripping and showing off their bodies for your viewing pleasure.
-I'm more familiar with the download system used at Metart, Femjoy, etc, where you can easily select the video of your choice and the file defintion, or the photo set of your choice and the file definition, but the Watch$Beauty system, while not as refined, is still usable.
-Sometimes the file download speeds seem sluggish. I wish they were faster downloads.
BOTTOM LINE
The emphasis is on the photos. There are hundreds of videos that are definitely worth watching, but the true value, for me, is the photo sets.
I could stare for hours at Rinna's 2 photo sets. She's such a luscious model, young, vibrant, fresh, lovely, charming.
In summary, I believe I've listed the main reasons for joining this site. Gorgeous models representing a wide variety of ethnic types, top class photography, a mix of high-rent locations where the girls are having fun exploring their lucious bodies. They freshen up with the offerings with casting, peeing, masturbation, girlsinlove. So they put more thought and care into the shoots than most softcore photo sites.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Focuses on solo girls peeing.
-Quality site for this niche.
-Rabbits Reviews (a sister site to PU) has discounted memberships to the Wet and Puffy network of:
$9.95 for the first month (recurring at $29.95/month)
$60 for the first year
$199.95 lifetime membership
-Navigation is easy.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-320p through 1080p videos. They advertise 4K is available, but I haven't seen them at this site. Maybe at another site in the network?
-Downloads/streams to PCs and mobile devices.
-Weekly updates.
-Cam shows.
-5 sites are included in your membership:
Wet & Puffy; Wet and Pissy; We Like To Suck; Eurobabe Facials; Simply Anal.
-The videos are good quality: nice sets, good camera work, nicely focused, well lit, good colors on the skin tones and the entire shot, good sound control.
Cons:
-The models range from plain or unattractive to some that are attractive. But the general level of the models' attractiveness is below the standards of most teen sites.
-Login details (username and password) are computer generated.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Pissing is the main focus, almost the only focus. of the site. No b/g, no g/g. So if you're not into pissing, the site would have limited appeal.
Bottom Line:
Stats:
Most videos run about 30 minutes.
Video definition from 320p through 1080p.
There is a low quality and a high quality zip file for each photoset, that is a record of the video.
The site theme is solo women pissing. I think piss smells bad, and it seems like an un-hygenic thing to rub piss on yourself, or piss on a furniture or the floor, or to drink or lick piss. But the models at this site are moaning and groaning like pissing is enough to get them off, without a male or female partner needed.
So if you're into pissing as a fetish (not painful or sadistic pissing, but pleasurable pissing), this site is for you. Because that's what the videos feature: lots of solo girls pissing, and rubbing the piss on their bodies, and drinking it, with lots of noise to show how wonderful the piss is when they rub it on themselves, or when they drink it.
But the girls can bring out a dildo, after they've been playing with their piss, to reach a higher orgasm. I guess the combination of piss and masturbation is the perfect combo for these girls. Because they've been pissing and stopping, pissing and stopping, but they manage to piss even more after masturbating with a dildo,
Watching these videos reminds me of the song, "Cry me a river", except in this case, it's more like "Piss me a river". The amount of piss these girls make is tremendous. I wonder if they use some device that makes water flow from the girls' pussies. That would help with the smell, and make the drinking and rubbing more hygenic, and the clean-up easier.
Because you have to watch a few of these videos to believe how much water/piss is coming out of a girl's pussy during a single 30 minute video.
I take diuretic pills (also called water pills) for health reasons, prescribed by my medical doctor. So I often have to pee every few hours (even at night, which wakes me up when my bladder is full). But I can't pee anywhere near what these girls are peeing.
They are younger than me, don't have my health problems, so I can understand they can pee more.
But not in the quantities of pee that seems to flow in a single 30-minute session. I couldn't pee that much in several days. I mean, it just flows, stop, flows again, stops, flows again, then flows some more, in small and large amounts.
So I'm suspicious that some of the "pee" is really water, coming from some hidden device.
Which might hurt the fantasy.
I'm giving the site a score of 88.
The site is heaven for pee fetishists.
Site structure makes for easy navigation.
Videos are professionally shot, excellent camera work, nice settings, excellent lighting and sound control and colors.
Photosets come in a zip file of two definition: regular and high definition.
I wish the models were more attractive. But that's a personal preference. Some PU members might disagree with my preferences, and think the models are very attractive.
Sorry.
I didn't mean to offend or say anything negative about other PU members.
The point I was trying to make is that other PU members have a different opinion on this site.
But I will try to avoid mentioning any other PU members in the future.
I thought I was being complimentary when I used your name and pinkerton, but evidently my intention was not make clear.
Again, I apologize for any misunderstanding.
Also, I have mentioned Teen Mega World many times in the past, usually with a compliment. I've been a member of that network many times. Not currently a member now. The same with the Wow sites, except I am currently a member.
I don't consider myself a shill, even though I do express high opinions about Teen Mega World and the Wow sites.
I'm not being paid for those opinions. My only connection with those sites was as a member, not an employee or shill.
But I do understand that my opinions can cause friction in other PU members.
Again, that is not my intention.
Sorry for any misunderstandings.
I meant no offense.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Joining any site in the small network gives you access to 5 sites.
The 5 sites are listed in the Bottom Line section of this review.
-Navigation is basically simple.
-There is a text file that describes the action of the video very well.
-Also, plenty of tags to describe the action of the video. So search is easy and can be very detailed, if you want it to.
-Newer videos have a definition of 320p through 4K. The 4K video file size is around 3.35 GB for a 23 minute runtime video, so the coding seems efficient.
-The content is exclusive.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
Cons:
-The level of attractiveness of the models is poor. Other PU members have written that they find the models to be attractive. I disagree completely. I respect the opinion of these PU members, but find it hard to agree with their opinion.
-I find the quality of the videos and photo sets to be poor. The images are not crystal clear, but either slightly unfocused or with a slight haze to the image. But since the models are not attractive to begin with, I wouldn't mind watching the video with the images in complete darkness, so I wouldn't have to view the models at all. (That is a joke, but also has an element of truth. These models are far below the attractive level of the Teen Mega World models, and comparing the models at Wet and Puffy to the models at the Wow sites is like comparing night and day: the Wow site models are fucking georgeous; the Wet and Puffy models are unappetizing.
-The online mechanism for viewing photo sets is clunky. Slow to load images.
-Pre-checked cross-sale.
Bottom Line:
The 5 sites of this network include:
Wet and Puffy We Like To Suck
Wet and Pissy
Simply Anal
Eurobabe Facials
There is also a live cam show at the network.
Membership in any one site gives you access to all 5 sites.
The stats for Wet and Puffy network:
Over 27000 photos. and
Over 480 models.
They advertise that the photos are the best ultra high definition picture sets.
They advertise that the tags, filters and layout of each page makes browsing simple.
The thumbnails that illustrate the models have washed out colors.
Even models that appear young and attractive at competing sites look plain and unattractive at this site, in the photo sets and videos.
You examine a photo in a photo set, and it appears as if the photo was taken with a filter that makes the model appear slightly out of focus.
Each photo set has 2 definition zip files, low and high.
The low definition is 666 x 1000 pixels.
The high definition is 2267 x 3400 pixels.
In the photos, the models are uniformly unattractive. They are plain-looking women. You go to a local mall, you find plenty of good-looking teens or twenty-year-olds. The models at this site are mainly in their twenties or thirties, and they are far less attractive than the normal twenty-thirty-year-old you find at your local mall. One reason is the photos have washed-out colors, so the skin tones of the models are not pleasing. A second reason is the models themselves are below-average in level of physical looks. Plus many of the models have lots of tattoos, which I'm not a fan of.
Even though the site advertises "best ultra high definition picture sets", I look at sets and feel the quality is far below the quality of any photo site, in any technical feature you can think of: these photo sets are shit. Teen Mega World, which is a hardcore teen site, has photo sets that are far superior in technical quality to the photo sets at Wet and Puffy. The the quality of the teen models at Teen Mega World is far superior in attractiveness to the Wet and Puffy models.
The Wet and Puffy models are mainly plain to unattractive. The photos are not worth collecting. They aren't even worth viewing.
Note: some of the live cam girls are really attractive.
Note: my opinion seems to be in the minority.
There are some attractive models at this site, but they are not presented attractively at the site. Delphine and Nika O, two girls who normally look very attractive at other sites, look washed out (in color and skin tones) and blah at this site. How a girl is photographed can make a huge difference in her appearance. Besides which, most of the models at this site are not that attractive to begin with.
Maybe I should have my eyes checked. I look for attractive girls at this site and can't find any. Some of the girls are attractive at other sites, but not at this site. I know that beauty is supposed to be in the eye of the beholder. The average female at any local mall, or even your local grocery store or Walmart, is far more attractive than the models at Wet and Puffy.
Maybe my problem is expectations: I assume that most models are chosen for their looks. But at this site, I think they were chosen for performing hardcore sex. Without bothering to filter for attractiveness.
The photo play mechanism for viewing photos online is clunky. Images are slow to load. The images themselves are poor in color, poor in clarity. You aren't viewing sharply defined images of the model.
The composition of the photo is poor. The sets are inexpensive or cheap and lacking in any imagination.
Overall, the photo sets are a waste of storage space, and not worth viewing.
I was a member of this site before, and wrote a review that highlighted how poor the site was, in terms of the attractiveness of the models, the poor quality of the photo sets. But my memory is poor, and I forgot how unappealing the site was. Which is the reason I rejoined. I was stupid.
Other PU members seem to appreciate the site much more than I do. They cite the attractive models at the site, the ease of navigation, the low membership price. I agree the membership price can be low: PU has the first month's membership for $15, or $60 for a year.
I agree that navigation is simple and effective, that Vendo and Epoch are fine billers.
But I can't agree the models are attractive.
Poor models, poor photography. And that kills the site for me.
I've had many subs through Vendo, and never had a problem with them.
And cancelling a sub through them, on their website, is simple and easy.
And you automatically get a confirming email of your cancellation, with the date on which your sub expires.
So I think Vendo is excellent, up there with CCBill and Epoch.
I just cancelled a sub to Wet And Puffy today, and it was easy.
REVIEW(CONTINUES):
There are no download limits.
The content is exclusive.
The content does not appeal to me.
The models are teens, which are my favorite type of models.
When I stream a video, the definition of the video seems low: it's like I'm watching a 360p video.
The images are not clear and crisp.
I can watch videos at all of my other paysites, and get clear, crisp images.
But at Wet and Puffy, the videos seem like they were shot by an amateur.
The videos are not sharply focused.
I can appreciate the videos at the Wow sites, the Teen Mega World sites, but not at the Wet and Puffy site.
So even though other PU members have found a lot to appreciate at this site, I regret my join.
I only paid $9.95 for one month, but one month was enough for me.
However, the $60 for 1 year price is very attractive, if you do enjoy the site.
I would rather pay a higher price, and find a site i enjoy more.
I don't like the clarity of the videos.
I don't like the photo sets.
I don't like the content.
Giving the site a score of 79.
If you enjoy the videos and photosets, as other PU members seem to, then you would rate the site much higher.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They are running a current special of $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $29.95/month.
But the special one year price is $60, which is very low.
-Vendo is the default biller. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've had many subs through Vendo, and never had a problem.
-Login and member pages are secure (https). So ISP does not keep a record of each member page you visit
-No streaming or download limits that I can find.
-You get confirming emails on signup, with your login details, subscription id, order details (price and duration of membership), credit card used, etc.
-Most videos are available in 320p through 4K definition.
-Videos have a runtime of 20 to 30 minutes.
-Photosets are available in zip files in 2 definitions: low and high.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-User name and password are computer generated, so have to write them down. But they are in the confirming emails, so can copy and paste into login page.
-The site has nice-sized thumbnails of the models, but the thumbnails are usually poor photos of the models: a home photographer could easily take photos that would make the models more attractive.
You look at the thumbnails of the models, and realize that the girls in any mall would look much better than what these models look like. How you photograph a model can make a huge difference in how attractive she appears.
I look through the thumbnails of the models, and I find some models I'm familiar with, such as Delphine, who is a very attractive blonde model, and at this site (at least, in the thumbnail), she is not attractive. Nika O, another attractive model, looks poor.
If a site does not have attractive female models, I usually have little interest in the site.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Even the models I know can be very attractive, at this site thumbnails, are not attractive.
-The online photoplayer is slow.
-The quality of the photos varies. From poor to OK.
-I've seen many screen caps at competing sites that were far better quality than the photos at this site: two problems with the photos at this site: the models are not made up to be attractive. The second problem is the quality of the photos: they are just poor photos. Even models that I've seen can be very attractive at other sites, at this site, they are not attractive. The colors of the photo are poor. The model looks poor. The photosets are a waste of time.
I look at the photos of Nika O, an attractive teen. I know it's her, because I've seen her at other sites. And I've seen her at other sites with the same name. But at this site, in the photos, she looks like poor. At MetArt, Nubiles, ShowyBeauty, she is an attractive young teen. Sexy. Erotic. An object of desire.
At Wet and Puffy, she is a piece of meat I would not look at twice.
Am I over-reacting? I don't think so.
Porn is fantasy.
But if the image of the model is so unappealing, the value of the porn is damaged.
There was a recent poll at PU that asked: "Do you feel high-quality photos are an important part of a site's content?"
Well, the photos at Wet and Puffy are not high-quality photos. They are low-quality photos, that degrade the value of the models, that degrade the value of the site.
Sites like X-Art, the Wow sites have good to excellent photosets, that display the attractiveness of their models.
The Teen Mega World network has improved the quality of their photos over the years, to the point where the photos can present attractive young teens and contribute to the quality of the network.
The photos at Wet and Puffy are poor photos, that degrade the value of the site.
Even when they do have models that are naturally attractive, those models are presented as un-attractive females.
Holly, another attractive model, has 1 video at Wet And Puffy. An attractive model, pretty face, voluptious body, but the video is hurt by the skin tones of the model. She's just not attractive.
At Wow Girls, where she's listed as Barbie, she looks great. At Wet And Puffy, because of the poor skin tones, she looks blah. Not pretty or attractive.
The lighting and other factors can add or detract from the value of a video, and at Wet And Puffy, the photos and videos are poor. Even when they take a pretty model, she will look poor or unattractive in her photos and videos at Wet And Puffy.
BOTTOM LINE(Start of):
Site theme: The site classifies a woman's pussy into one of three types:
puffy peach, juicy cherry or big taco.
So the site focuses on pussies and toys.
Whatever it takes to get a woman off.
(Except no men are allowed.)
So you get all kinds of masturbation with toys.
-You get access to 6 sites with a membership.
wetandpuffy
weliketosuck
wetandpissy
puffynetwork
simplyanal
eurobabefacials
There is also a live cam show at the network.
Porn is fantasy.
One of the main factors I look at is how attractive the models are.
The models at Wet and Puffy are not presented attractively.
That is a major negative factor, for me, at least.
So, in spite of the current special price of $60 for one year, I would not join this site.
That is a personal judgment.
Other PU members have found the site to have value.
Homegirl gave the site a score of 90.
mbaya gave the site a score of 95.
tangub gave the site a score of 84.
It's a large site.
Over 900 videos.
Over 900 photo sets.
Different people can have wildly differing opinions of the same site.
The same with a movie: a critic can say a movie is wonderful, a different critic can say the same movie is disappointing.
That's why I used to try to find a critic that I could try to depend on, because his/her reviews of movies were in alignment with my opinions of movies.
Some PU members scored Wicked Pictures very high. Other PU members thought the site was poor. Other PU members thought the site was good, but not great.
Different strokes for different folks.
Do you believe a site has an intrinsic value that shines through the same for everyone?
I think you're being harsh when you question the value of The Best Porn site.
It's a good source of information about porn sites.
Some information might be wrong, and the score is only a guide.
I find the PU reviews to be more useful, to get a feel for what a site offers.
But that's just me.
But before I join a site, I usually like to read TPB and PU reviews, to see if a site is worth my money.
Maybe I should add that Pure Taboo (one of the Adult Time channels) is probably my favorite story-based porn.
Some of the stories can be interesting. Even though they often border on the un-believable or strange, the stories can add meaning to the sex, and the sex can be hot. It also helps that the models can be attractive.
So I don't mind if a scene spends a lot of time on the set-up, if the set-up is done well.
Excellent review, as usual.
But I don't agree with with one of your cons.
"The only major con is that the sex scenes themselves are often too short with the bulk of them being under 30 minutes and nearly 1500 of them being under 15 minutes."
This is not a criticism of the review or your ideas.
But I personally find that sex scenes that go over 15 minutes start to get boring or repetitious for me.
I like the idea that there is a setup to the sex scene to give the sex more meaning than 2 or more bodies slapping together.
But when the sex goes on too long (and I think 15 minutes is plenty long for a sex scene) then I start to lose interest. Maybe it's my mind just doesn't appreciate all the details of sex, but I don't usually consider sex an endurance contest, and, while I can admire some of these models for their stamina, I personally prefer a much shorter version where the models start slow, then build up to a climax. A sex scene that goes 15 to 30 minutes usually indicates multiple orgasms for the female, which doesn't turn me on. Get the model hot, get her off, then cuddle or show appreciation, or don't show appreciation, whatever fits the scene.
That's just me.
Other people can have different ideas or appreciations.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Wow network. You get access to 4 sites when you sign up to any one of these 4 sites: All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, Ultra Films. They often have a special discount of
$69.95/year for access to all 4 sites.
The PU discounted price is $29.95 for 2 months, recurring. $89.95/year (recurring).
-Unlimited streaming and downloads for all 4 sites.
-The model selection is outstanding. Late teen and early 20s models from Eastern Europe are among the finest I've seen. This is not a glamour site or network, but the teens themselves have appeared at many teen sites, and some are featured at glam sites like Metart and Femjoy.
-Videos from the last few years are available in 720p, 1080p, 2160p(4K), 3132p(6K). For the 4K and 6K definitions you need high-end monitors.
-You can select to stream or download parts of a scene, or the entire scene.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The photosets are high-grade photos. Not quite the same as the photosets at Metart or Femjoy, but just as collectible, considering how attractive these models are, and these photosets, especially the ones of a solo model, are just as good as anything you can find at Metart or Femjoy or any of the glam sites.
-Photosets the last few years come in your choice of definition for online viewing or downloads in 1000px, 2000px, 4000px, original. Original definition is 5760px.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are basically minor. Each site is a goldmine of attractive young teens.
-Technically, when you join, you are only a member of one of the 4 sites, although you have access to all 4 sites. Not sure why they define the membership this way.
-You get one login details for 3 sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn), and a separate login details for the Ultra Films site. Would be simpler to have the same login details for all 4 sites.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Login details are: Username is your email address. Password is assigned random characters.
Can't choose your own password, to make it easier to remember.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
I should note that when I write reviews, I'm trying to provide details that I believe are accurate. But I don't bother trying to verify each detail. For example, when I write that a site provides unlimited streaming and downloads, I'm basing that on what I know. But I don't bother to verify each detail with the site. If I read or hear that downloads are limited to 300 GB per day, I will mention that, but since I rarely download anywhere near that limit from a site on a daily or even weekly basis, I would not experience that limit personally.
Also, some sites have limits on download managers. I don't bother to use a download manager anymore, but I've read that some sites don't allow download managers. Other sites might limit the way you use a download manager, to one stream. But since I don't use a download manager any more, I don't spend time trying to check download manager rules from a site, or write any download manager details in my reviews.
Also, many years ago sites used to use software that only allowed downloaded videos to be played if you had a current membership to the site. But I haven't seen any sites that still use DRM software in years.
Bottom line on Wow Girls: Wow Girls is an excellent hardcore teen site. The teen models are stunning. The videos are crisp and clear, with excellent technical qualities: good colors, good lighting, nice sets, nice costumes (I say costumes, but they are nice, regular everyday clothes, or lingerie, or bikinis), good sound control, etc. The photosets are also good to excellent, not glamour shots, but a good photo copy (not screenshots, real photos) of the video.
The sex is basically good clean fun: horny teens having sex. Not a lot of buildup to the sex, not much romance, almost no plot to many of the videos. Most teen porn models are not actors, so you don't have to watch them trying to act. Also, at many teen sites, the plots are so stupid you can't enjoy the action. Or the comedy is so stupid you wonder why the writers can't come up with something better. So the Wow Girls site (and the network) is a relief from stupid plots and poor acting.
I keep repeating myself, but I think the site (and network) is one of the finest hardcore teen sites. The sex is simple and usually straight-forward. No slapping or spitting on the girls, no unnecessary roughness, no over-the-top calisthenics. Just good clean fun.
Solo girl masturbation, girl-girl, more than 2 girls, throw in a boy, throw in two boys, mix and match to get some variety. But the main attraction is how cute these girls are.
That, plus the clear visuals, the excellent skin tones, etc.
This site and network are an excellent join.
Especially if you can find the $69.95/year special that is offered throughout the year.
Just noticed the same video posted at 18Videoz and Wow Girls.
This is the first time I've seen the same video posted at 18Videoz and also at Wow Girls.
I guess the Wow Girls site is running out of new content, so they are using content from other sources.
The video is titled "Dating Means Mating" at Wow Girls, posted 11 May 2021.
At Videoz, it's titled "Casual teen fuck on rainy day", posted Jul 31, 2019.
The video features Ariana Shaine, a cute teenager who puts on a really good show.
Glad to see she is featured at different porn sites.
But would like to see different material at each site I'm paying for.
LOL.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-If you join any one of the three sites: All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, or Wow Porn, you get access to all 3 sites.
-They've had a sale price for months now. $29.95 for 2-months membership, unlimited streaming and downloading. Or 1-year membership for $89.95 (recurring).
-The major attraction of the 3 sites is how attractive the models are. These teen girls are some of the most attractive models on the internet.
-Navigation is basically simple. You can search through the model listing (alphabetical or by popularity or latest addition). Or you can search by video or photoset (same listing system).
-There's a huge amount of content at the 3 sites. Both videos and photosets.
-The technical qualifications of the content is excellent. This is borderline glamcore. It's hardcore action, but not rough or over-the-top sex, not a lot of heartcore: mainly, it's girls getting off. By themselves (masturbation), with one or more other girls (lesbian), or with b/g, b/gg, or a few boys with girls.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
But the sex is straight blowjob, pussy sucking, vaginal and anal fucking.
-The models are naturally attractive teens. Very few boob jobs. Not a lot of tattoos or piercings. This is not a glamour site, the models don't wear fancy costumes, but the sets are nice and clean, whether indoors or outdoors, the stunt cocks are mainly attractive young male teens.
-The 3 sites have had 4K for years now. And they've started to remaster some of the videos to 6K resolution, for people who have very high resolution monitors.
My monitors max out at 1080p, and I normally watch and download at 720p (to save storage space, and because my older eyes can't tell the difference of higher definition videos anyway).
-You can download videos in your choice of definition from 480p through 4K. Some videos have been remastered to 6K.
-You can download the entire video, or can download selected parts of the video.
-You can download the photosets in your choice of zip definition.
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Update rate is 1 video or photoset per day (that's for the 3 sites, not each site separately).
-The customer support is excellent, one of the finest I've ever dealt with. They have a live chat that is 24/7, that answers within a few minutes.
CONS(START OF):
-I think the cons are basically minor. The 3 sites, or any one of them, are among the finest hardcore teen sites on the internet. Lovely models, fine technical quality of the videos and photosets, girls who put on a fine show of enjoying their bodies.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-The 3 sites do have some non-exclusive content. Teen Mega World (another fine teen hardcore network) and Team Skeet have a lot of the massage videos that are posted at the Wow sites. And some other content at the Wow sites is also duplicated at Teen Mega World and 18XGirls. (18XGirls site has died, I believe.)
-Rarely, download speeds might be slow. I've had almost no problems with download speeds at their sites. But also, I don't download a lot any more, so I'm not the best expert on download speeds.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site theme is teen girls enjoying sex. The girls are lovely. The sex is hardcore, but it's not extreme, no domination, no BDSM.
Although the girls don't wear glamour costumes, and the sets are not glamourous, the sets are clean and the videos and photosets are clear and crisp and showcase these lovely girls very well. Not a lot of makeup or glamor, but the girls are so young and naturally attractive that it's a pleasure to watch them in action. And to study those lovely bodies.
There is no blog (eliminated years ago), where members can ask questions and share talk.
There is a glitch in the navigation, where if you hit the backspace button at a member page, instead of going back one page, you instead bring up the login page.
But these are all minor glitches. The site (and 2 other sites you get with a membership) is one of the finest teen hardcore sites available. I recommend the site highly, and give it a score of 94. The models are just so fine.
I'm a current member of the Wow Girls site.
Not on their staff, just a regular member.
I have no idea why you are being blocked.
My suggestion would be to have a live chat with Vendo.
The Vendo website has live chat 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Live chat is immediate, you don't have to wait for an email response.
Also, you can get a written record of what they say, if you copy and paste the chat to a text file.
Click on the "live chat with support" hot link, and a popup box appears.
Fill in the information, and you should be connected with a live chat operator within a few minutes.
Since you don't have a sub with them yet, just give your name, and your email address you want to use.
Vendo also has email support and telephone support, but I've used their live chat, and you get a fast response, within a few minutes or less.
Explain your problem, and see if they can solve your problem.
Separately, on the join page for Wow Girls, there are 2 pre-checked cross-sales for other sites.
Make sure you uncheck those pre-checked cross-sales, or else you will be signing up for a trial to 2 other different web sites, and the trials turns into very expensive subs that you can get much cheaper elsewhere.
If you look at the Beata Undine page at Indexxx.com (a free database of porn stars), you will find that Beata has been featured in a large number of porn sites.
If you want to find additional material for her, it should be very easy.
The indexxx.com page shows the sites she has be featured at, as well as the number of appearances at each site.
Diamond status refers to the old system of membership, where there were different levels of membership.
If you had diamond status, you had access to the three sites:
All Fine Girls Wow Girls Wow Porn
Under the current system, you are automatically given access to those three sites, if you join any one of the sites.
The All Fine Girls site was created by using the 18 Only Girls site, plus a small amount of content from some other sites. Most of the content from the other sites was dropped, and the site names were dropped/ended as well.
That happened several years ago.
As far as I know, there are no archive sites in the 3 sites I mentioned.
However, there are non-member sites that hold some photosets and videos from the 3 sites, that might hold some other content that was dropped.
You can also find some of the 3 sites' content on tube sites.
It's been many years since I was a member of 18x Girls.
That's because of the overlap (or duplicated content) of that site with TMW.
There used to be a site called 18 Only Girls.
That was part of what was called the Diesel Access network.
The Diesel Access network had a number of different sites.
Then, several years ago, they dropped those sites, except for the 18 Only Girls site.
A lot of the content from the dropped sites were dropped completely.
But some of the content went into the 18 Only Girls site.
Which was then re-named All Fine Girls site.
So:
the current situation is that if you join All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, you have immediate access to all 3 sites.
A few years ago, the situation was different:
if you joined Wow Girls or Wow Porn, you had immediate access to the other site.
And if you stayed a member for over 2 months, you also gained access to All Fine Girls site.
But if you joined All Fine Girls site, you only had access to that site, until you were a member for over 2 months, when you then gained access to the 2 Wow sites.
Or, you could pay a large one-time payment, and gain access to all 3 sites.
Many years ago, the one-time payment was $70.
A few years ago, they dropped the one-time payment to $20.
I remember that 18X Girls and TMW had a lot of overlapping content.
Aside from the Tricky Masseur content and the cross-advertising videos which were clearly labelled, almost all of the content at All Fine Girls and the 2 Wow sites was exclusive, as far as I can remember.
All Fine Girls is the re-named site for the older 18 Only Girls site, with some content from the Diesel Access network sites that were dropped/eliminated/closed.
If you have a collection of videos from the 18X Girls site, and many of those videos were duplicated at All Fine Girls, then your collection shows that there was more duplication than I was aware of.
I don't want to beat a horse to death, but apart from the Tricky Masseur videos, the Wow+ sites do have a few videos that are cross-advertising. That is, the videos were posted at other sites, and then were posted at the Wow+ sites, as a form of cross-advertising.
But these videos are clearly labeled as coming from the other sites.
They are not trying to trick you that they are exclusive.
Apart from the Tricky Masseur videos and the cross-advertising videos, almost all of the content at Wow+ sites is exclusive.
I've found less than 4 videos or photosets from the Wow+ sites that were posted at other sites (apart from the Tricky Masseur videos and the cross-advertising videos).
You're not missing anything.
But---
I am and have been a member of TMW for a few years (consecutively).
Also a member of the Wow Girls, Wow Porn, All Fine Girls for a few years (consecutively, except for a 2-day break when I got a lower price on re-joining).
If you read my reviews of Tricky Masseur (part of TMW), you will see that I've said, for years, that all or almost all of that site is also at Team Skeet (at the RubATeen site in that network), and that many of the videos at Tricky Masseur are also posted at the Wow Girls (or Wow Porn or All Fine Girls) site, and also at the 18X Girls site, and probably at other sites as well.
However, apart from the Tricky Masseur vidoes, almost all of the content at the Wow Girls + Wow Porn + All Fine Girls sites is exclusive to those sites. If you want to take the time to examine every one of the videos at the Wow+ sites, you will find a very few videos or photosets that are not exclusive, but the vast bulk of the Wow+ sites is exclusive.
And as you stated, in the past, the Wow+ sites used to have the Tricky Masseur videos in higher resolution than the TMW Tricky Masseur site.
But TMW has been upgrading the network, and TMW now offers the same
TMW and the Wow+ sites are 2 of my favorite hardcore teen network.
The reasons:
The models at Wow+ are attractive to lovely.
The models at TMW are attractive, not presented with as much care as the Wow+ models, but you've got a huge amount of attractive teens at both sites, who can either enjoy sex, or else put in an act where they seem to be enjoying the sex.
The TMW network has less content that is exclusive than the Wow netowork, but I think that both networks have good to excellent value, which is why I've had year-long memberships at both sites.
Maybe I'm stupid, but I feel like I'm supporting sites I really enjoy.
On a historical basis, the Tricky Masseur videos were first posted at Tricky Masseur, then posted at the Wow+ sites, then posted at Team Skeet (at the Rub A Teen site). The Rub A Teen site is a clone of the Tricky Masseur site. By clone, I mean all the videos at Rub A Teen are the same as the Tricky Masseur site (that was true about 1 or 2 years ago, which was the last time I was a member of Rub A Teen, and was able to compare Tricky Masseur with Rub A Teen.
I assume the 18x Girls copies of the Tricky Masseur videos were posted after they were first posted at Tricky Masseur.
I assume that Tricky Masseur either leases their videos, or purchased them on a non-exclusive basis, which is why their videos are posted at these other sites.
I don't think that it's a mistake to join the Wow+ sites because the Tricky Masseur vidoes are posted there, and at other sites.
There's plenty of other content at TMW to see.
Not all of it exclusive.
But I'm guessing that much of the TMW material is exclusive, apart from the Tricky Masseur site.
That's a guess, because I never bothered to closely examine the 18X Girls site in comparison to the TMW content.
I have a current sub to Wow Girls.
Site is currently up and running.
I can log in, and stream videos and look at photo sets.
If you are still having problems with the site:
1. check to see if your login details (username and password) are accepted.
2. send an email to customer support explaining your problem.
Customer support can be slow to respond. I sent an email to customer support a week ago, and have not gotten a response yet.
3. Contact the billing company, and explain your problem. If you can't access the site, ask for a refund, or ask them to give you a new membership.
You will probably need your login details, plus some other details.
Check the confirmation email you should have gotten when you joined.
4. Try logging in through Wow Porn or All Fine Girls. You should have access to those sites, with a membership to Wow Girls. The login details should be the same for all 3 sites.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Teen Mega World network. Membership in any one of the network sites give you access to the entire network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for to access.
-It's easy to switch between different sites of the network. You don't have to re-login to each separate site.
-Low price. PU offers a $14.95/month recurring discount.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
Cons:
-Small archive site, only has 43 videos and matching photosets.
-Last update was April 2013. The videos are offered in 360p, 480p, 720p.
Many PU members want higher definitions, 1080p or 4K, for their viewing pleasure.
-Login and member pages are non-secure.
-The site features real teens. Some of them are attractive. But overall, I feel the site models are less attractive than the general level of the models of the entire network.
-Poor search engine. You enter a model's name, and you get numerous hits that are random. The best way to search for a model's content is to go the model's page, where you will find links to her content at the entire network.
-Vendo is the default payment processor. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch.
However, I've had many memberships through Vendo, and never had a problem.
Actually, I like Vendo, because the Vendo website shows you all your current memberships through Vendo.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Whereas CCBill will only show you a single subscription on a single page (you have to enter separately your identification details for each sub you want to look up).
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-A line of ads at the bottom of each member page. Not too obtrusive.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site theme: is a female model reaching orgasm.
Most of the videos are guy/girl, but there are a few threesomes, and one lesbian video of two girls.
The site advertises: "This amazing website provides you with the greatest collection of massive 'Oh my God' orgasms. Stay here, and experience divine arousal followed by the most powerful climaxes!"
I think that's typical porn site exaggeration.
Although the videos do show orgasm, I couldn't find any divine, over-the-top videos at the site. For that, I would recommend Rocco Siffredi or the Teen Fidelity sites, which do offer some over-the-top videos of intense sex.
The site only has 43 videos (and matching photosets).
It was started in August 2012 and stopped updating in April 2013.
So it's a small archive site.
As a small archive site, the content is standard teen hardcore. The main positive about the site is that you get access to the entire Teen Mega World network. You can skim the site contents in less than a day, downloading whatever is of interest in less than a day. But the network itself has plenty of good, solid teen hardcore content with plenty of attractive young teens.
I'm giving the site a score of 70. If the site was a stand-alone site, the score would be lower. But as part of the Teen Mega World network, the site is worth browsing to find whatever content might interest you.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
