I don't like anything that requires scrolling on my laptop's screen (which is 1400 and is unlikely to go any higher any time soon). Viewers (like Irfanview) have 2 problems: they don't work inside browser and quality of resizing isn't that good.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ young black chicks in hardcore action
+ chicks are HOT
+ cameraguy work is above average
+ reasonable action variety (anal is frequent, sometimes up to DP and even DPP)
+ easy navigation
+ "one big clip" download
+ access to Jerk-Off Pass network (27 more sites)
+ CCBill as card processor
Cons:
- pics are just screencaps
- not many updates (thecid66 review says 29 episodes in April-07, not it's like 35-40)
- annoying login (with difficult to recognize image recognition), auto-logouts.
Bottom Line:
In an ongoing effort to cover Jerk-Off Pass network, here goes another review of one of their sites.
My Black Coeds is one of the better sites of Jerk-Off Pass. It is about hot (and I mean REALLY hot) black girls in hardcore action. There are about 35-40 episodes on the site (each is 20-30 min video), and all are within the theme. Action varies from just B/G hardcore to DP. Cameraguy work and setups are very good, but video encoding is typical for Jerk-Off Pass network ("average", not so clear 640x480). Pictures on this site are just 640x480 screencaps.
Site also borrows some (mildly) annoying features of the whole network: infrequent updates and very annoying login system.
Bottom line: a good site for those who're into young black girls. Access to the rest of the Jerk-Off Pass network easily compensates for infrequent updates on this specific site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ young chicks in hardcore action
+ chicks are cute
+ plot is fun
+ video quality is better than average
+ creativity (different setups and combinations)
+ both screenshots and real pics
+ easy navigation
+ "one big clip" download
+ access to Jerk-Off Pass network (27 more sites)
+ CCBill as card processor
Cons:
- IMHO it crosses the thin line between "implying sex with legal teens" and "implying sex with underage teens"
- most likely not many updates (as with other sites of the same network)
- could be just fragments from movies (so it's not exclusive) - see comments/reviews for DirtyBabysitters
- annoying login (with difficult to recognize image recognition), auto-logouts.
Bottom Line:
This site belongs to the same JerkOff Pass network as DirtyBabysitters and shares a lot of features (not content) with that site (also shares some features with the other sites of the network, but DirtyBabysitters is definitely the closest thing).
Overall, SchoolBusChicks would be about on par with DirtyBabysitters, but there is one thing that annoys me about site's content: IMHO it crosses the thin line between "pretending to show legal teens" and "pretending to show underage teens". I'm quite sure all the models are above 18, but for me even pretending to show underage teens having sex isn't a good thing. That's the reason why Dirtybabysitters got much better rating than SchoolBusChicks (while I can easily imagine college girl doing babysitting, schoolgirls having sex are off-limits for me).
There are 20+ episodes there (each is 20-30 min video), and all seem to be within "schoolbus" theme (with appropriate plot and dialogs). Girls are cute, action is hot, cameraguy work is very good too. Video encoding is typical for the JerkOffPass network (which means "very average").
Bottom line: would be a good site for those who're comfortable with "schoolgirl sex" theme, but I'm not so ok with it. The rest of the network can make it worth the money even without this site.
> if all porn was condom only, then any teen/young person who saw that
> would probably think that it's a good idea for him to wear a condom or
> her to ask that her partner does as well.
Exactly my point. On the other hand, I'm not that optimistic that it is possible to make ALL porn condom-only, and think that there are much better chances to make SOME porn condom-only, but restrict TEENS exclusively to this SOME condom-only porn (and even if this last restriction will be only 80-90% successful, it would still be a positive thing).
> We know everything at that age, and our parents are the ignorant ones
Right! Exactly my point.
> You and I both know that since the hardcore porn exist most will bypass the mild stuff, and go for the hardcore one.
Sure, but my point is that even hardcore can easily be educational and promote desired behavior, so it is not about it being softcore. My point is that if there will be hardcore but with condoms all the way and with models/actors showing care for each other, it should be enough for a teen to stop looking for something more hard, and on the other hand will get used to the view that a guy ALWAYS puts a condom before starting sex. As I remember myself as a teen, I would definitely NOT try looking for anal or BDSM or anything else if I'd be able to see just simple plain hardcore, with condoms or not; and the younger the teen - the less chances for him to try going further, that's a good thing too. Compare it to what we have now: when teen starts looking for porn (and he starts for sure), most likely he'll find some stuff where women are treated like s**t, and/or all kinds of things which are really harmful at that age, from A2M to WS and beastiality; don't you think that if he would run into hardcore, but condom-only and "caring" porn, it would be much better for him?
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ young chicks in hardcore action
+ chicks are cute
+ plot is fun
+ video quality is better than average
+ creativity (different setups and combinations)
+ both screenshots and real pics
+ easy navigation
+ "one big clip" download
+ access to Jerk-Off Pass network (27 more sites)
+ CCBill as card processor
Cons:
- not many updates (TGP review lists 32+ episodes mid-06, not it's like 50+)
- plot is unbelievable (but still fun)
- allegebly it's just fragments from movies (so it's not exclusive) - see pat362's comment
- annoying login (with difficult to recognize image recognition), auto-logouts.
Bottom Line:
Though this site belongs to the same JerkOffPass network that several other sites I've recently reviewed, but it stands out of the other JerkOffPass sites, and to the good. The only annoying things it shares with the rest of JerkOffPass sites are login system and average video encoding quality (though cameraguy work is much better than that of the other sites).
There are 50+ episodes there (each is 20-30 min video), and all seem to be within "babysitting" theme (with appropriate plot and dialogs). Girls are cute, action is hot, variety (setups and action) is very good (action varies from plain B/G to DP), cameraguy work is very good too. Video encoding is typical for the JerkOffPass network (which means "very average").
Pat362 wrote that this site just publishes pieces of movies published by some studios (see his comment); I cannot confirm or deny this claim, but it looks quite likely to me: quality of cameraguy work and post-production is much better than for the other network sites and very good, but encoding still suffers and isn't a match for cameraguy work; clips (unlike other network sites) are 16:9.
Bottom line: overall very good (though probably non-exclusive and rarely updated) site, especially for those into hardcore video action with young girls, and/or interested in access to the rest of the network.
First of all, thanks a lot for taking it seriously (which I'm sure it deserves).
> I'm really tired of reading about teenagers having babies and how
> cute it all is.
Cute? Not until parents are making conscious decision to have a child, and I don't see how it can happen until about 20 (on the other hand, I think that waiting until 35 isn't really good either).
In general, I agree with you on most of the points, except one: I'm sure that influence of "educational porn" will be more significant than parent's talk (and in ANY case it will have positive effects in promoting responsible behavior, so it will help rather than hurt). The reasons are two-fold: first, teens in range of 13-17 tend to live in their own world, with one of the main rules "ignore what parents say", so while as a parent I spend significant time in such talks and there is enough trust between me and my children when we're talking to each other, I'm still afraid that when they're with the other teens, they can EASILY forget all our talks (probably they will be sorry later, but it might be too late).
Second, it will hopefully distract kids from extreme porn (which they will watch regardless of controls; keeping dedicated and smart 16-year-old from bypassing all the controls is IMHO hopeless, and to make things worse, the more extreme stuff is, the less companies that run such sites tend to abide by rules like site labeling).
:-). No, personally I don't like big black dicks (or any dicks whatsoever), but seeing them within the hot girls - that's completely different story :-).
I see; everybody has his own fetishes :-), and I was trying to highlight who is this site was made for; personally I'm not that big fan of dicks but should admit big black dicks and group sex add variety, and variety is the king for me personally.
> Children should never watch that stuff.
With most of them are fucking like RABBITS at 17, do you think that ANY porn will really harm them? This is not rhetorical question as it might seem; I can't agree more that there should be a difference depending on type of stuff, and that anywhere extreme or condomless should be avoided, and that currently you won't be able to find anything besides that, but if somebody would produce love/educational stuff with right connotations (love, care about partner, using condoms and so on), don't you think it would be more useful for , say, 17-year "children" to watch it than not watch it?
What's the big deal if dicks are really big and black (well, they're not that big as one on FreaksOfCock, but still not an average dick, and not even an average porn dick)?
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ black guys on white chicks
+ chicks are hot, dicks are black and big
+ easy navigation
+ "one big clip" download
+ access to Jerk-Off Pass network (27 more sites)
+ CCBill as card processor
Cons:
- most likely won't be updated (see reviews for other sites of the network, like GanglandVictims).
- very little content
- booooring - always one guy and one girl (without anal)
- pics are just screenshots (quite blurry 640x480)
- annoying login (with difficult to recognize image recognition), auto-logouts.
Bottom Line:
One more site of JerkOff Pass network, and once again it shares things like login, navigation and video quality with other sites of the same network, like GangLandVictims. This site is a new kid on the block, so it's difficult to tell how often it will be updated, but given history of the other sites of the network (see reviews), most likely it won't be updated often or won't be updated at all.
The main difference with the other sites is obviously content; here I should say that while action is quite repetitive (how many different things can you do in one guy-one girl combination without anal?), it is compensated a lot by quality of the girls: they generally look quite good and it looks that they really enjoy themselves too.
There are about 15 episodes on site, each is about 30 min video, and all within theme. As with other JerkOffPass sites, main attraction is video (pics are vidcaps of quite low quality/resolution). Variety of actions isn't so good, but as I've said above it's pretty much compensated by girls looks and enthusiasm. And as with the other JerkOffPass sites, overall video quality is very average.
Bottom line: not that bad content overall, but with that little content and with unlikely updates isn't worth it as a separate site. As a part of the big network is definitely worth a look (especially if you've already joined because of some other site :-)). All in all, not a bad addition to the network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ DP site
+ group action
+ some girls aren't bad for this kind of action
+ easy navigation
+ "one big clip" download
+ access to Jerk-Off Pass network (27 more sites)
+ CCBill as card processor
Cons:
- most likely not updated (TBP lists 16+ episodes back in January, now it's 20)
- not much content
- booooring; always two guys and a girl
- pics are just screenshots (quite blurry 640x480)
- annoying login (with difficult to recognize image recognition), auto-logouts.
Bottom Line:
This site belongs to the same network that GangLandVictims I've reviewed a bit earlier, and quite expectedly it shares lots of common things with it. Video and pic quality, lack of updates, annoying login and pretty good navigation are all the same. There is one difference though and it's definitely not in favor of Plug2Holes: it is lack of creativity here. It is ALWAYS 2 guys on 1 girl, so in the very first clip they try everything they can, and all the other clips become BOOOOORING (there is one clip with DAP that adds some twist, but that's about it).
There are about 20 episodes on site, each is about 30 min video. As with GangLandVictims, main attraction is video (pics are vidcaps of quite low quality/resolution). As with GangLandVictims, all episodes are within theme (every episode has DP, and there is at least one DAP; no DPP was sighted). And also as with GangLandVictims, cameraguy work and lighting are very average, and so is quality of compression; in short - very average site from video quality standpoint.
Bottom line: IMHO not worth the money on it's own; considering the rest of Jerk-Off Pass network, can be not too bad as there are some better sites there.
To make a change in a pattern of our recent disagreements :-), I should agree with you here - it does look suspicious. There is also just one thing that puzzles me - how one of these guys managed to get "trust" rating by Marianna? Maybe she should check if her password was stolen/guessed?
> rather allowing them to go out to a bar where many provide fake ids and go seriously overboard.
And I should add it's a lot safer to start drinking (illegally) in small amounts at 16, rather than to get absolutely drunk on perfectly legal grounds all at once when child turns 18 and happily brings his ID to the bar.
On the other hand, aren't these laws there meant to protect children? If so, why we should sit and silently agree with laws which in fact HARM our children (if alternative options are safer, it means that the law at least isn't as good as it should be)?
> the first three answer options in this poll are not options at all
They can easily be options if interpreting the question the way as I've read it ("what would you do if you were making laws") or another way "what would you do if it would be legal"?
And as I understand US law (which I can easily misunderstand as I'm not a lawyer), this question and answers to it cannot possibly be illegal (in modern US; I'm not speaking of Iran or Orwell's Oceania, where most likely even thought about it would be punished) as they're covered by the First Amendment. Right to DISCUSS things freely is a fundamental right in modern liberal society, so let's not fear to DISCUSS even the most controversial (and even potentially illegal) issues.
When I've seen this question, I've interpreted it as "if you were making laws, at what age would you make it legal to watch porn?"
And if I would make such laws, I would definitely put very big difference between 'mild' and even 'educational' porn (come on, average age of having first sex is about 15 years old (!)) - which should be legal at least from the age 15, and probably even earlier, especially if it promotes condoms and responsible behavior, and 'extreme' porn (which should be banned at least until 25). I'm 200% sure that porn that promotes condoms (by using them all the time) will do much more to ensure youngsters having safe sex then any blatant kind of propaganda (which teens tend to hate a LOT, and I cannot blame them).
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ black guys on white chicks
+ group action
+ DP, DPP, probably even DAP - you name it
+ despite "victims" in site name, not much pretended abuse
+ reasonable variety for this kind of site
+ easy navigation
+ "one big clip" download
+ access to Jerk-Off Pass network (27 more sites)
+ CCBill as card processor
Cons:
- not updated (TBP lists 35+ episodes back in 2005, now it's 40)
- plot is unbeleivable (but still fun)
- pics are just screenshots (quite blurry 640x480)
- annoying login (with difficult to recognize image recognition), auto-logouts.
Bottom Line:
GangLandVictims is a member of Jerk-Off pass network with 28 sites (including 2 sites currently unlisted by TBP).
It is an interracial site (well-hung black guys on white girls) with a twist: their plot is "one wrong turn and you get gangbanged", with girls supposedly getting lost in black neighborhood and getting banged by a bunch of black guys. Sure it's unbelievable, but the way it is done is surprisingly funny. Girls seem to enjoy scenes, and there is little pretended abuse (despite site name and plot).
There are about 40 episodes on site, each is about 30 min video. Main attraction is video (pics are vidcaps of quite low quality/resolution). All episodes are within theme, and there are tons of anal and DP (almost every episode has DP). Variety is pretty good for this kind of site: not only all positions and twists are tried (including DPP and I think DAP), but also setups are quite different. Cameraguy work and lighting are very average, and so is quality of compression: videos are 640x480 with 1.2MBit/s stream, and quality isn't too good for this high bandwidth; in short - very average site from video quality standpoint.
Bottom line: reasonable site for interracial/group/DP video fans; 1 month membership to grab all you like can be worth it, especially considering network access. Pics should be looked for elsewhere though.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
