| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
276
|
Mega Penetrations
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ "mega penetrations" as advertised
+ hardcore action in addition to "mega penetrations" (often up to DP, sometimes DPP)
+ reasonable variety (different toys and setups)
+ easy navigation
+ "one big clip" download
+ access to Jerk-Off Pass network (27 more sites)
+ CCBill as card processor |
| Cons: |
- sometimes action is disgusting
- girls aren't really cute (expected for this kind of content)
- probably infrequent updates (just as with other sites of this network)
- pics are just screenshots (quite blurry 640x480)
- annoying login (with difficult to recognize image recognition), auto-logouts. |
| Bottom Line: |
Here comes yet another review of yet another Jerk-Off Pass site. While it isn't exactly my cup of tea, I'll still try to review.
Unlike most of the other sites of this network, there is not much plot in videos. Still, there are indeed "mega penetrations" as advertised, plus lots of hardcore action in each episode (often up to DP, sometimes even with DPP). Variety is here, but sometimes this site crosses the line going into things I consider outright disgusting (sorry guys, but eating stuff which sticks out of girl's ass isn't really my cup of tea; fortunately, it is just an occasional twist rather than typical for the site).
There are about 30 episodes on the site, each is 20-30 min video. Cameraguy work is decent, but video encoding quality is typical for this network and is "very average" (not really clear 1.2MBit/s 640x480 WMV).
Pics on this site are just 640x480 screenshots, so pics lovers don't need to bother.
As with the other sites of this network, updates aren't expected to be too frequent (see other my reviews of Jerk-Off Pass sites).
Bottom line:
For big dildo lovers, who don't care about pics, it should be a very good site. For others who aren't that much into this kind of things but (like me) can take an occasional look - can be a valuable addition to the Jerk-Off Pass network. |
|
01-18-08 12:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
277
|
Funny BDSM
(0)
|
|
01-18-08 09:16am
Replies (3)
|
Comment
278
|
Funny BDSM
(0)
|
|
01-18-08 09:09am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
279
|
Nikki Jackson
(0)
|
Reply of
mistake62's Reply
> ccbill do not want help me ( very dissapointed for them).
Usually they're quite cooperative in cases like this (when it is not content being disputed, but site doesn't provide access). Personally I'd give CCBill another try, making it crystally clear what is the problem.
|
01-16-08 11:16am
|
Comment
280
|
Dirty Babysitter
(0)
|
|
01-16-08 09:05am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
281
|
Nikki Jackson
(0)
|
Reply of
mistake62's Comment
If you paid with a credit card, I would suggest to go to CCBill first and explain situation in detail. If CCBill doesn't help, go to your bank with explanation along the following lines: "this was a payment for subscription service which I paid for a month and access was terminated after 2 days. All my numerous attempts to contact merchant didn't succeed"; as the service wasn't really provided, they should be able to revert original credit card transaction.
|
01-16-08 08:53am
|
Reply
282
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
Thanks. A nice change in the world where things tend to change from bad to worse.
|
01-16-08 06:37am
|
Reply
283
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Poll
Agree with Drooler and DivBZero above.
|
01-16-08 06:06am
|
Reply
284
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Personally I've never hit it, but I won't be surprised if they do. As most of really good sites, kink.com has technical stuff who're not on par with content to put it mildly. See my comments about their login system, which is one of the most annoying ones in the industry.
|
01-14-08 09:50am
|
Reply
285
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
As I'm a video kind of person, I never do it :-).
|
01-14-08 09:45am
|
Reply
286
|
Diabolic
(0)
|
Reply of
DiacolicChris's Reply
It would be indeed "cross-sale" and "special offer" if checkbox is NOT pre-checked (like reputable sites and processors like CCBill do). If it is pre-checked, I name it swindling; sure, you can invent your own names. BTW, I'm pretty sure that my issuing bank will side with me in disputing this charge if I will ever fail to notice such small print (on payment page I was selecting some specific price, and was charged a different one, with amount actually being charged being NEVER shown to me; that should be enough for bank, VISA or court to revert this charge and put fines as well as punitive damages to processor and/or merchant). Disclaimer: opinions here are just my personal opinions and shouldn't be taken as legal advice.
|
01-09-08 12:19pm
|
Reply
287
|
N/A
|
Reply of
s1vus1's Reply
> So if we all do it why does it feel so wrong!
"It's all in your head, Mr. Tweedy, it's all in your head" :-). More seriously, modern society obviously still has prejudice against porn (just like 100 years ago there was prejudice against alcohol strong enough to amend US constitution to prohibit it), and most likely you have too much respect for society to throw away it's prejudices. But things will hopefully change, like it has already changed in many areas. As a prominent example, some time ago there was a very strong prejudice against gays, but now it has almost vanished; I'm pretty sure the same will eventually happen to porn. Meanwhile, I suggest to analyze WHY it's wrong? Because it hurts somebody or just because majority says it's wrong? If it's only the latter, it's a prejudice to be thrown away (why you should allow OTHERS to decide what's right and what's wrong for YOU as long as it doesn't hurt anybody?)
|
01-09-08 06:36am
|
Reply
288
|
Hairy Undies
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
> I'll report any sketchy ones I see
Thanks in advance; this is what this site is for :-).
|
01-08-08 03:19pm
|
Reply
289
|
Hairy Undies
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
I see, thanks. Things are much worse than, with CCBill probably being the only trustworthy processor to date (at least it wasn't caught doing it - I think they're doing almost the same thing but with checkbox unchecked, and it IMHO changes things dramatically from swindling to not so annoying upsell) :-(.
> generally the trial sites seem to be owned by the same owner of the sites that I'm subscribing too
I used to think so too until I've run into Epoch using the same technique on purchase of Diabolic site selling PornStarsTop, and these 2 sites don't seem to be related (I'd even say they're from very different leagues).
|
01-08-08 03:08pm
|
Reply
290
|
Hairy Undies
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
Thanks for warning.
Do you remember what was their credit card processor? Wasn't it Epoch by any chance? I've seen such thing (which I think is nothing short of swindling) a few times recently, and I think it was Epoch all (or at least most of) the time.
Moreover, I'm not even sure if webmasters of original sites get anything from such "trials"; it would be very interesting to see a comment from one of them here (and if Epoch is doing it without consent of webmasters, it can easily find themselves in a DEEP TROUBLE; such company as Diabolic won't hesitate to sue Epoch in such case).
|
01-08-08 02:04pm
|
Reply
291
|
Be The Mask
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
> I think its fake, have you ever watched a video by them?
No, that's why I'm asking.
> The guys always seem to never be nervous. Also no way a normal
> guy that walks into a pornset for the first time, and sees a
> sexy pornstar is going to last 15 minutes during sex.
Thanks, I see your point. Probably you're right :-(.
|
01-08-08 01:57pm
|
Comment
292
|
Diabolic
(0)
|
|
01-08-08 09:56am
Replies (2)
|
Review
293
|
Messy Gang Bangs
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ young chicks in hardcore action
+ chicks are HOT
+ most of girls seem to like it
+ variety of setups
+ all MMF action you can get, up to 3M+3F and up to DP/DPP/DAP
+ easy navigation
+ "one big clip" download
+ access to Jerk-Off Pass network (27 more sites)
+ CCBill as card processor |
| Cons: |
- pics are just screencaps
- not many updates expected (as with other sites of the network)
- annoying login (with difficult to recognize image recognition), auto-logouts. |
| Bottom Line: |
Here goes yet another review of yet another Jerk-Off Pass site.
As the site name suggests, this site as about gangbangs (no idea why they named site "messy gangbangs", but gangbangs are here in every episode, no doubt about it :-)).
Site has about 30 episodes, 20-30 min each. Each site has plenty of MMF action, starting from 3M+1F and ending with 3M+3F or 4M+2F. Action always involves some DP, sometimes DPP or DAP. And IMHO the most important and attractive thing about this site is that girls seems to REALLY like most of the action, including anal and DP; IMHO it's a nice change from the most of the "reality" sites playing "abuse" theme.
Cameraguy work is decent, setups are good, but video encoding could be better (as with other Jerk-Off Pass sites, it is not really crisp 1.2MBit/s 640x480). Pictures are just 640x480 screencaps. Updates are not dated and most likely are infrequent (as well as for the other sites of the same network).
Site also borrows some good and bad features from the other sites of the same network, such as "one big clip" download on the plus side and very annoying login system on the minus side.
Bottom line: a very good site for those who like MMF action, and if updated frequently, could even stand on it's own. Without frequent updates, probably wouldn't be worth it as a standalone site, but access to whole network easily makes up for lack of updates. |
|
01-08-08 08:48am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
294
|
Diabolic
(0)
|
|
01-08-08 08:09am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
295
|
Play Sex Game
(0)
|
|
01-08-08 08:01am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
296
|
3D Sex Games
(0)
|
|
01-08-08 07:57am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
297
|
Be The Mask
(0)
|
|
01-08-08 07:50am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
298
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I see ABSOLUTELY NOTHING wrong with viewing porn. Nobody gets hurt (except for people like those who established Prohibition back 100 years ago), and after all it is MY money I'm spending, and if I prefer to watch porn to other form of entertainment (like watching Gone With the Wind), it is MY right to spend the money the way I want (as long as my family doesn't get hurt by my porn spending).
Moreover, I feel that watching porn is helping me to avoid REAL problems, like going to prostitutes (for me it's all about variety, and I'm getting enough variety watching porn).
|
01-08-08 05:12am
|
Review
299
|
Small Tits Hunter
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ young chicks in hardcore action
+ chicks are cute
+ video quality is better than average
+ easy navigation
+ "one big clip" download
+ access to Jerk-Off Pass network (27 more sites)
+ CCBill as card processor |
| Cons: |
- not much content
- somewhat boring
- only vidcaps as pics
- most likely not many updates (as with other sites of the same network)
- could be just fragments from movies (so it's not exclusive) - see comments/reviews for DirtyBabysitters
- annoying login (with difficult to recognize image recognition), auto-logouts. |
| Bottom Line: |
Here goes yet another review of Jerk-Off Pass network site. SmallTitsHunter is a newer addition to this network and quite a decent one I should add.
Theme of the site is about young-looking girls, who usually indeed have quite small tits :-). As site is new, there are only 10-15 episodes. As usual for the Jerk-Off Pass sites, clips are 20-30 min length, all within advertised theme. Cameraguy work and lighting are way above average, which is somewhat negated by typical for this netork "very average" encoding. Cameraguy work is so good that it raises question if it is just scenes from movies (see pat362's comment on DirtyBabysitters site of the same network). As with other sites of the same network, you shouldn't expect too many updates. On this site pics are vidcaps only.
Bottom line: this site is hardly worth it's price primarily due to very small amount of content and expected infrequent updates (though content quality is pretty good), but as a part of Jerk-Off Pass network with 27 other sites it can be worth a try. |
|
01-07-08 03:47am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
300
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
About ACDsee - thanks for suggestion. About Windows viewer - sorry, not good enough for my eyes :-). But the most important thing for me personally is that I'm mostly viewing pictures in-browser only and quite rarely outside browser (I'm more of video fan than picture fan :-)).
As a side observation: if there are lots of people like me, some kind of plugin with decent downsize algorithm can have a business case :-).
|
01-05-08 06:38am
|
