| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Comment
Currently it's not that small that it used to be, and IMHO is currently worth the visit if you're interested in the idea.
|
04-14-08 12:27pm
|
Review
252
|
The Training Of O
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ femsub training (by both males and females, but mostly males) combined with sex
+ strong psychological element
+ Safe, Sane and Consensual BDSM
+ most models (both male and female) really love it
+ ability to leave feedback
+ ability to download whole episode as a ZIP
+ video/image quality is good
+ cameraguy work is excellent
+ setups are good |
| Cons: |
- still less content than other kink.com sites
- training of the same girl is divided into several episodes (which is ok), but these episodes appear not one after another, which is annoying |
| Bottom Line: |
TheTrainingOfO is quite a recent addition to kink.com sites. It is quite similar to SexAndSumbission, but also is very different. The idea is that the same guys take one girl and train her as a good slave. It takes them 4 days to do it (actually 5 with 1 day rest), which means ability to see gradual progress of the girl. Not all girls succeed in training, but most are trained well. Site has very strong psychological element in play, and it's a bit more geared towards domination/submission theme, than towards SM or sex (though there is plenty of both SM and sex too, with all kinds of sex present, including anal).
As all other kink.com sites, TheTrainingOfO is all about SSC (Safe, Sane and Consensual) BDSM, with most models being really into the scene. Chemistry is usually excellent, and overall feeling is just great.
Site is new, but at this point they've already got about 50 episodes (which is still less than other kink.com sites, but quite enough for me).
Bottom line: one of the best BDSM sites out there, with strong emphasis on psychology, a bit physics, with lots of sex added to the mix. Highly recommended (in a sense, it's "advanced version" of SexAndSubmission, at least for me). |
|
04-14-08 12:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
253
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
> professional style reviews that see the trees but miss the forest.
> That's why I read porn USERS more than professional reviews, even TBP
> reviews.
Ditto. EXACTLY the way I see it too.
|
03-26-08 08:47am
|
Reply
254
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I'm wondering if there will be somebody admitting his reviews are below average :-).
|
03-26-08 05:52am
|
Comment
255
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
|
03-25-08 02:29pm
Replies (8)
|
Reply
256
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Thanks. It looks that the whole industry goes downhill. "We're not cheating anymore" is now considered a good advertisement :-(.
|
03-25-08 02:20pm
|
Reply
257
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
I think I've missed something :-). Could somebody tell what's all this whole story is about?
|
03-21-08 12:03pm
|
Reply
258
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
For me it's about as annoying as a pop-up ad (or a banner which has flashing). And i HATE pop-up ads and flashing banners.
Visually the best-looking are Flash previews which start playing when clicking on it, but on the other hand I'm into downloads and not into streaming, and Flash previews can't possibly show video quality of downloads.
|
03-21-08 11:52am
|
Reply
259
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
"I wish they'd shut up" with one exception: pre-shooting interview.
|
03-04-08 01:52pm
|
Reply
260
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Poll
Buying hardware specially for porn? Sorry, no. Otherwise would like to take a look at thin MacBook.
|
02-21-08 04:41am
|
Reply
261
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tan_lines
Enjoy :-)
|
02-13-08 02:20pm
|
Reply
262
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
Unfortunately proof of doctor visits doesn't really provide 100% guarantee :-(. Sure, it's much better with it than without, but there is still some risk. Let's say it the following way: without STD checks it is plain suicide (and I hope at least decent companies never allow it without the check), with recent STD check it is much better, it's like a round of russian roulette :-).
|
02-08-08 08:55am
|
Reply
263
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
As a fantasy - sure, in reality - come on, I have responsibilities in real life.
|
02-07-08 04:37am
|
Reply
264
|
3D Sex Games
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
Thanks a lot. Being a big fan of sex-related games, I'm putting 3D Sex Games on my "want to try" list :-).
|
02-03-08 02:18pm
|
Reply
265
|
3D Sex Games
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
Wow, thanks a lot for an extremely detailed answer. Just one thing which is unclear - does 3D Sex Games use motion capture or not? How natural are movements there?
|
02-03-08 10:21am
|
Comment
266
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
|
02-01-08 11:39am
Replies (0)
|
Review
267
|
Diabolic
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ full Diabolic videos
+ videos are often released on site almost simultaneously with DVD releases
+ tons of videos
+ production quality (setups, lighting, cameraguy work) is extremely good (not surprising for Diabolic videos)
+ frequent updates |
| Cons: |
- even newer videos are of not that good encoding quality (640x480x1.5MBit/s); while appropriate for some other stuff, Diabolic videos suffer from it greatly
- video quality of old videos is really low (400x300x650kBit/s)
- content within the same series is repetitive and soon becomes boring
- girls aren't always pretty (not that surprising for this kind of content, but Diabolic could probably do better)
- swindling attempt by Diabolic/Epoch (see my comment) |
| Bottom Line: |
I should say that as a strange side effect of subscribing to this site I became a bit disappointed not about this site, but about Diabolic as a movie studio. While their movies are of really good quality (setups, lighting, cameraguy work) especially by adult web standards, seeing all of them in one place reveals that there are quite few themes and most of them quickly become quite repetitive.
Other than that, there is not much to say in addition to TBP site facts. Yes, they are full Diabolic videos, yes, there are lots of them, yes, they're released to the site very close to releasing DVDs, but quality isn't nearly that good that you'll get on DVD (and for Diabolic videos you will see the difference, it's NOT homemade production which doesn't suffer from encoding); older videos are of measly 400x300, newer are 640x480 but I've seen better encoding at this resolution, in particular color balance looks very degraded compared to Diabolic DVDs). Sex (as usual for Diabolic) is on rough side, with lots of anal/DP/A2M and other such stuff, but girls aren't always really pretty (not too surprising, but Diabolic could probably do better).
Bottom line: could be really good site for Diabolic fans or fans of professionally shot rough porn, but only if you don't care too much about encoding quality. Personally I'd prefer to see less videos and/or only older ones, but of significantly higher quality. |
|
02-01-08 11:23am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
268
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
> even though the winner was obvious after the first 60 seconds.
Yeah, was exactly my feeling too, but with tag teams it doesn't feel that "one-way" even if one team is outclassed (when there are 2 wrestlers from one team against one from the other, obviously they dominate regardless).
|
01-29-08 09:46am
|
Comment
269
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
|
01-29-08 08:28am
Replies (3)
|
Comment
270
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
|
01-29-08 07:17am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
271
|
Funny BDSM
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
> The price has kept me away.
I'm not surprised; $50/month is really outrageous.
> for such a determinedly rough sex site.
I don't think it's really "rough", there are much rougher sites out there (such as SadoSlaves). Personally I'm not a big fan of rough SM (and especially don't like "abuse" theme), so what turned me on about FunnyBDSM was it's funny part.
|
01-29-08 07:06am
|
Comment
272
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
|
01-28-08 07:49am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
273
|
Funny BDSM
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
> how it compares to Sex & Submission or Chanta's Bitches or Fucked and
> Bound, all sites that I really enjoy.
Depends on your preferences (see my reviews of SexAndSumbission, FuckedAndBound and FunnyBDSM). For "Real BDSM" stories SexAndSumbission IMHO wins hands down, with FuckedAndBound going close second (can't comment on ChantasBitches).
> is the action "fakey?"
For stories NOT labeled as "Real BDSM" - yes, definitely; for "Real BDSM" ones - probably not.
> Interesting stories or just silly stuff?
Depends on your point of view: for me they're interesting, but I won't make any representations :-) - for some they can easily be "silly stuff". Take a look at descriptions of "Heil Dickler" and "Court of Justice" series in public area of the site - they're pretty much accurate.
|
01-28-08 07:30am
|
Review
274
|
Funny BDSM
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ really funny stories (for not "Real BDSM" episodes)
+ really good setups (costumes and so on)
+ recent videos are of good quality (2MBit/s WMV)
+ lots of episodes
+ dated updates once a week |
| Cons: |
- "Real BDSM" stories have strong "abusing" context
- outrageous price
- older videos are RealPlayer-only
- no "all episode" download
- pics are vidcaps only |
| Bottom Line: |
FunnyBDSM leaves a lot of mixed feelings. First of all, content can be divided into two distinct categories: episodes labeled "Real BDSM" and episodes not labeled as such. "Real BDSM" isn't something really special, but quite usual (and annoying for me) BDSM movies with strong "abuse women" theme. Other episodes (not labeled as "Real BDSM") are mostly fun: while "abuse" theme is also present there, but it's usually so grotesque that neither myself nor models can take it serious; there is no real BDSM there too and it's pretty obvious (yes, they show marks on bodies but they're fake). "Court of Justice" and "Heil Dickler" series are prominent examples of episodes I consider funny. In all the episodes (both "Real BDSM" and not "Real BDSM" ones) there is usually some sex action in addition to BDSM (up to occasional anal).
On technical side: site is updated weekly, and each new episode consists of 2-4 about-5-minute clips. Quality of recent clips is very good (2MBit/s WMV + some RealPlayer), but older ones are RealPlayer-only and aren't as crisp.
Bottom line: if leaving outrageous price out of consideration, clips not marked as "Real BDSM" could be quite interesting for a change; unfortunately, most of recent clips are "Real BDSM". "Real BDSM" clips are about "abuse women" theme rather than "Safe, Sane and Consensual" BDSM (though a few most recent clips seem to migrate in that direction), with medium intensity, including sex. |
|
01-28-08 07:22am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
275
|
Funny BDSM
(0)
|
Reply of
Marianna's Reply
Well, everybody here has some fetish; I admit I have plenty of them :-).
|
01-20-08 07:08pm
|
