| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
326
|
Jerk-Off Pass
(0)
|
|
12-15-07 02:33am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
327
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Come on, there is no need to go that personal; I'm sure there are LOTS of people like me out there. See for instance review of m64bob. BTW, if being exact, it is not only cock which is covered, pussies are also covered, aren't they?
|
12-14-07 05:15am
|
Reply
328
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Just put it in caps so it will be obvious on the first glance at the review :-).
|
12-14-07 05:08am
|
Reply
329
|
Just Jannah
(0)
|
Reply of
bootiger's Comment
It's amazing how far some people can go with "protecting" content. It's even more amazing how they cannot understand that it not only doesn't make any sense technically (bypassing it is not a rocket science for sure), but how much money they lose because of these tricks. Kudos to all the sites who avoid DRM (and cheap tricks like disabling right mouse clicks), and shame to those who use it.
|
12-14-07 05:06am
|
Reply
330
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
> If you do not like authentic Japanese porn, don't join.
While it's still possible to argue about the term "authentic", there is no point in it. What about the following: you will write in caps in your reviews of such sites: "THOSE WHO DON'T LIKE MOSAICS DON'T BOTHER", and I (and people alike) will never join such a site. Deal? :-)
|
12-14-07 03:52am
|
Reply
331
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Quite a difficult question. For example, if I review site with lesbianism and I like it, but I don't like the way it's shot, should I lower the rating? Probably yes. Moreover, even if EVERYBODY does it "wrong" (from my point of view), but there is one site that does it "right" - should I make the ratings different? Probably yes too. But this is exactly the case which we're discussing - there are tons of sites with "mosaics", but there are a few without; should I put higher rating for those without if I hate mosaics? I think so.
PS Not that I personally will ever knowingly join the site which has mosaics - that's what PU is for :-); the main thing is to make it clear in review, and the rest is not THAT important.
|
12-13-07 06:31am
|
Reply
332
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Voted and was really surprised with current results: 4 out of 4 said "twenties" :-).
|
12-13-07 03:53am
|
Reply
333
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
> I guess for the genitally obsessed, this would not be a good site.
For me it's not about genital obsession, it is about distraction and feeling that something is "f****ng censored". If there won't be any genitals from the very beginning (for example, using only angles with no genitals in sight) it wouldn't be a problem for me, but this mosaic drives me nuts (I hate censorship in any form; for me it's even worth than DRM :-) ).
> Material such as you mention, if produced in Japan, is a crime.
As far as I've heard, it is a crime NOT to produce, but to PUBLISH it in Japan (otherwise nobody would be able to shoot any porn or even erotic there as genitals aren't covered with mosaic when the actual thing happens :-) ).
If it is really the case, then it is perfectly legal to sell some uncensored footage to US company (maybe with a restriction "not to show/sell to Japanese users") which will be able to sell uncensored thing to the rest of the world. I've personally bought several uncensored Japanese DVDs in US (or was it in UK? I don't remember) shops (not Internet shops, but "real" adult shops), and I don't think real adult shops will deal with anything illegal when there are tons of perfectly legal things out there.
|
12-13-07 03:51am
|
Reply
334
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
On the other hand, there is pretty decent amount of Japanese-style anime out there without mosaic; to do it they just need to sell non-mosaic originals to non-Japanese company which isn't bound by Japanese publishing laws (another option is to produce Japanese-style anime outside of Japan). So from my point of view it is a definite and BIG minus (why I should be hit by Japanese laws? especially if there are perfectly legal ways to avoid it).
|
12-12-07 04:52am
|
Review
335
|
Big Sister Live
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ unique idea (live cams in real brothel)
+ it seems to really work as advertised
+ choice of monthly subscription or pay per minute
+ with monthly subscription there are no extra charges
+ quality is very good for webcam
+ video archives of past encounters
+ events (like "live gangbang") |
| Cons: |
- horrible login system (see my comment)
- "hot time" is about midday EST only
- video archives are streaming-only
- no subtitles so conversation is unclear |
| Bottom Line: |
It is a very unique site effectively creating a very new niche. They say it is a real brothel (in Prague) with live webcams there, and I beleive it. For me just a notion that it happens for real and I can go there and be one of those guys is a turn-on (not that I'm going to do it :-)).
As they say, it works quite simple - it is a real brothel, where guys come and have sex with girls for free in exchange for right to translate it over the Internet worldwide. They have lobby with customers choosing the girls and some strip dancing going on (ranging from "very boring" to "just boring"), and several webcams there. When customer chooses the girl, they come to one of private rooms (there are several) where they have several webcams too, so the whole encounter is translated 'live'.
Quality is decent for webcam (they can stream from 500kbit/s down to 100kbit/s). As with any brothel, it is pretty deserted except for "hot time" (like 6PM to 10PM local time in Prague, or 11AM to 3PM EST). For those who cannot see it live because of timing, there are archives (with surprisingly wide range of activities - from anal/DP to SM - it seems they're doing just everything in Prague brothels). Archives are streaming-only :-(.
Bottom line: very innovative idea and very good execution of the idea. If you're turned on by the very idea of spying the real brothel (or turned on by the idea you can fuck the same girl for real), this site is definitely worth a try IMHO. |
|
12-11-07 12:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
336
|
Taste My Own Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Not going into discussion on personal tastes (personally I don't care much about A2M), I want to comment on "clang of iron". There were times when producing (and even watching) of ANY porn would have caused to hear the clang of iron; for some reason I don't really miss that times :-). So my personal motto is: "I don't care as long as all the activity is consensual activity between consenting adults". If somebody wants to see eating shit and somebody wants to produce this kind of stuff - I don't care though I think it's REALLY disgusting; it is outlawed in certain places, but I think laws prohibiting it should be thrown away (which already happened in many - but not all - places to other laws outlawing such things as anal sex or being gay). Why somebody (especially government) should care about things that happen between consenting adults?
|
12-11-07 06:20am
|
Reply
337
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
For me it's a pity to end such an inspiring conversation. Anyway, obviously is up to you :-).
|
12-07-07 04:27am
|
Comment
338
|
Big Sister
(0)
|
|
12-06-07 05:25am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
339
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
Thanks for explanation; that's the way I've already answered :-).
|
12-06-07 05:17am
|
Reply
340
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
> But chasing gold has never made for a better human being.
Sometimes gold comes out as a nice side effect of efforts to change this world. As you're RagingBuddhist, changing the world is probably contrary to your principles too, but sometimes it changes the world to the better :-). Moreover, someone chasing gold can change the world to the better even without aiming it. I think Bill Gates is one such example; despite my negative (to put it mildly) opinion on him (his business practices back 10 years ago were really atrocious), I should admit that he has made substantial contribution towards Internet culture and associated freedom of communication and knowledge.
|
12-06-07 05:15am
|
Reply
341
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
giants, did you mean "to watch" or "to do"? These are different things for me :-).
|
12-05-07 02:53am
|
Reply
342
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
+1
|
12-05-07 02:50am
|
Reply
343
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
What THEY say is that it is not a wallet, but something that the guy has achieved in life (with money being one of achievements - if they're not inherited but earned). The bad thing is that they don't know themselves how much of it is about achievements and how much is about hard cash :-).
|
12-05-07 02:46am
|
Reply
344
|
Public Invasion
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Comment
> Hopefully that happens one day, because that would be
incredibly hot. We can all hope.
Fat chance :-((. The closest thing to "real reality" I've ever seen is on UltimateSurrender and DareRing (on both sites they're hired models but action seems to be unscripted, though in different way), or on NudeInPublic / NudeInPublic.tv (girls are hired models in real environment with onlookers). If you know of any other site which doesn't have scripts, please let me know :-).
|
12-04-07 11:07am
|
Reply
345
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
> Uhhhhh, size of what? My wallet?
In certain cases size of wallet can be a good substitute :-).
|
12-04-07 04:07am
|
Comment
346
|
Big Sister
(0)
|
|
12-03-07 10:32am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
347
|
I Am Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
nige1960's Comment
And what billing company it was? We need to know not only Bad Guys, but Good Guys too :-).
|
12-03-07 09:46am
|
Reply
348
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
> trying to convince women that this |-----------------------------------| is seven inches.
No problem to convince them about it - you just need a font (or monitor) big enough :-).
|
12-03-07 09:44am
|
Reply
349
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I don't think it will happen this way. IMHO it is driven mostly by customer's opinion and models won't be able to change anything :-(. For each one going condom-only there will be ten willing to do condomless.
|
11-30-07 01:44am
|
Reply
350
|
N/A
|
Reply of
TheViking's Poll
I've put 'Epoch' because of BlacksOnBlondes form with 2 pre-checked "free 1 day trial auto-renewable at $20/month" checkboxes (see my comment on BlacksOnBlondes for details). No other negative experiences with processors (it's funny, but my experiences with non-adult CC processors are MUCH worse than with adult ones).
|
11-29-07 02:36am
|
