Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the oldest online porn niche sites (first scene was 2003).
- Classic scenario (gloryhole) brought into the internet age except the taboo is white women with black men.
- 651 scenes up to 1080p download (details on resolution in Bottom Line).
- Photos/screencaps available for download.
- Simplistic navigation but requires a lot of clicking.
- Epoch is the biller.
- Still updating every two weeks.
Cons:
- The common con of heavy-niche content becoming repetitive applies here, though they and others have tried to add more to this niche.
- The dull scenes, this niche, maybe more than any in porn should bring out some kind of primal excitement from the female or fear but some of the models on here show no excitement or taboo stimulation.
- Not a con for me but if you want 4K you're going to have to pay $3.99 to $4.99 PER scene.
Bottom Line:
This site and Blacks and Blondes were two very important sites in my online porn interests. There was an old TGP site that had 5-10 second clips of porn scenes (early 2000s) and Blacks on Blondes and Gloryhole were two of the sites often featured. They would put 2-4 of these 5-10 second clips up for download and you would then have to merge them or load them in a playlist to watch them in correct order.
I was only early 20s though I had been exposed to porn (VHS/DVD/Magazines) for years. Gloryhole was probably the first I had seen that had a niche or story to it. At the time, I was also an undergraduate student and remember the university I was attending at the time actually having "real" gloryhole "problems" in some of the less used buildings. Those real ones were more for gay men like the married professor who would go to one of the gloryhole restrooms to get or give a blowjob to or from a college guy. Keeping in mind, "gay" was not as mainstream back then as was taboo for a heterosexual married male with children to risk getting caught in a restroom with another male.
I later heard of couples that wanted to experience something different using it as a way to experience swinger life without going full swinger.
The scenes here follow a fairly repetitive format. The big difference between scenes is the female model. Some are there to collect a check. Some will masturbate a little before starting the blowjob through the wall. Some do a good job of making you feel like they're genuinely excited, others don't. It is the upside and downside of Gloryhole porn. There's not a lot of middle ground. The scenes either seem to be near perfect or barely watchable.
Someone did come up with the idea of adding sex through the gloryhole. This is also hit or miss. If the cameraperson is unable to get a good angle, all you see is the side of the woman bouncing back and forth into a wall. Other times the cameraperson gets a closeup and steady view of the penetration.
Considering how long this site has been around their collection is not that large with only 651 scenes in 17 years. That's less than an average of one new scene per week since its start. On the other hand, this is not a common niche. I remember once searching gloryhole scenes on a DVD site and finding maybe 8.
They have tried multiple variations of the blowjob through the hole in the wall from sex through the hole in the wall to multiple guys.
The ones I seem to like the best are the ones where the woman is giving a blowjob through the gloryhole while fingering herself.
There's not much to complain about with the site and quality unless you want 4K. These are exact numbers, the most recent 190 scenes have up to 1080p and also have the purchasable 4K upgrade for each of those 190 scenes. The 220 scenes before those had up to 720p. The other roughly 50% scenes are 480p and below.
I do think they could have done something to fix the disparity in quality. A mass remastering of all those 480p and below scenes up to 720p (minimum) would make the content on this site very collectible being a rare niche usually filmed in poor to average quality.
As it is, it's an above average site with what is becoming a repetitive niche just because of the limitations the wall presents. That shouldn't take away from its importance in porn history as a site that was taking major chances nearly 20 years ago.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Point of View site that does the reverse cowgirl POV as good as anyone.
- Good blend of models from stars to ones I've never seen.
- 286 scenes according to my count (see cons and bottom line).
- 146 of the scenes have 1080p, 5 have up to 4K and some of the oldest scenes drop to 480p.
- Photos/screencaps with zip downloads are available.
- Good navigation features and accurate tags.
- Active webmaster that is both helpful and listens to his fans.
Cons:
- It's become clear that there is a certain level of recycle or lost content on the sites on this network.
- As much as I like POV, I do think it gets more repetitive than other hardcore filming styles.
- The oldest scenes here really should be remastered.
- No update schedule or dates on scenes.
Bottom Line:
Mr. POV is the old story of a guy with a camera. They do a better job of POV filming than the average POV site. There's very little bouncing of the camera. Another part they do well with POV that other POV sites fail at is they have the volume at a good, balanced level. A lot of POV sites are very loud due to the camera being in the guy's hand.
They excel most at the reverse cowgirl position, one of the most underrated positions in POV porn. I think this position comes closest to making you feel like you're there. It's a very flattering position for the model (in most cases) and if you've had much reverse cowgirl sex you know you really don't get this good of a view in person.
The models are mostly teen to late 20s. You'll find some stars here like Aaliyah Love and the long-forgotten Bree Olsen, I recognize Allie Addison as a newer model. I don't know that she is that new but she does have a scene here.
I'm not going to completely bomb the score on the review for what is either lost content or removing content and recycling it. Their webmaster is pretty up front about they're a small group. They sometimes don't have new content so they re-release an older favorite. I would like to see them remaster. As for the recycling, which is something I wouldn't say unless I knew it was happening and I felt like it could help others. Those of us that are collectors do look at the numbers to see how much new has been added since our last membership. I've been a member here at least 8 times (since 2015). The 2015 TBP review lists over 300+ scenes. Looking at the content currently there are 17 pages with 16 scenes per page, that's 272 scenes and the 18th page has 14 scenes on it for a total of 286, that's at least 14 less scenes than they had in 2015.
What saves the network and this site too is this is overall a underrepresented niche. Not really the POV but their style of filming, this is porn that is very safe to watch with a woman. It's how I found these sites. One of my exes was really into Manojob and the style of filming they do even on Mr. POV.
It's easy to recommend it to someone that's never been a member or someone that has been a member but didn't keep their downloads. The content they have is very good. If it was me, I would take those old scenes down and start remastering them and put the 720p and up scenes on it.
They're one of those sites/networks that will get some added points for ease of use, good tags, active webmaster, they're trying to make it work and I appreciate that about them.
I would be even happier with Mr POV if they started doing some pussy tease from reverse cowgirl. They do it some on Manojob. It's a good supporting site to the Finishes the Job network.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Don't let the title of the site fool you. There is also sex here.
- As of 3/28/20 they have 322 scenes.
- Very high technical quality.
- Very attractive models, I don't know a lot of them but I'm guessing these aren't amateurs.
- Released a new scene on the 3/26/20 and were releasing a new scene each week (see bottom line).
- Download speeds are good (80% of max).
- Very good PU discount
- Vendo is the biller
Cons:
- Should it be a con that the scenes aren't 100% oral? If you're looking for just oral based on the name you might be disappointed.
- Really strange happening when signing up (will explain in bottom line)
- Scenes could be a little longer, some are less than 20 minutes. None of these are major cons.
Bottom Line:
I'm going to start with the strange happening or else I'll forget it. I was signing up for my account and unchecked the pre-checked cross sale, hit submit and there was an error. When I went to sign up it generated a username and password for me. The username was too long for their system to process. How does that happen? I think it was 14 maximum characters and the username it generated for me was more than 14. I didn't see any way to change the username until it rejected the auto-generated one. Just something they might want to look into.
One more part to get out of the way, on their updates, they have a notice up that in coming weeks they are going to be posting compilations, releasing remastered old scenes, releasing scenes from other sites, because of the Coronavirus.
I like this site but I do wonder why part of the scenes end up being sex scenes. Some of the scenes have as much vaginal as oral. They do often switch between in the middle of vaginal back to oral. The site has added value for me since a lot of the vaginal goes into at least a certain level of tease. It adds an erotic feel to the scenes. The camerawork is a major plus here. They do a very good job of focusing on the model's face/mouth/eyes during the oral parts. I remember saying something similar about a blowjob only site. Blowjobs in porn are usually too fast and jackhammer-like. The ones here give you more of a feeling of the model really enjoying giving the blowjob.
There are 322 scenes. Of those 80 have up to 4K video downloads. The other 242 have up to 1080p. They also have 720p, 480p, 320p and even 810p WMV. The scenes also have downloadable photos in high or low resolution. They also offer a trailer for each scene. If they offer anymore they're going to need a longer dropdown box.
This is another site with very extensive tagging features. They even have more fun with their tags than other sites. Three "pussy" types are Plump Peach, Juicy Cherry and the classic Big Taco. They have 10 different tag categories just for the type of model and 7 different tag categories for the action depicted in the scene.
The models are mostly Czech/Russian but thanks to their nationality tag, I can see that they have models from 21 other countries too.
The scenes usually start with some teasing, then some oral (both ways), a little sex finds its way in and usually back to oral to finish. The star of this site is possibly the cameraman or woman. Though lacking much story there is rarely a wasted frame of video and in today's porn world that is a plus. No bouncing cameras, no focus on someone's butt cheek while the action is 6 inches away.
I did laugh about the age filter on models. The most common age is 21 (83) and somehow, they have 0 that are 22, then jump up to 30 that are 23.
You also have access to the Wet and Puffy Network which has four other sites on it. Be sure to join through the Wet and Puffy Network page here on PU, it's only $9.95. The value raises the score a few extra points too. This is very high quality porn at an excellent price.
It's just different enough in their style of filming and niches to keep it from being another mainstream cookie-cutter network. Their staff seems active like with the Coronavirus post which also shows complete transparency on their part to announce how things are going to have to change until we get through this Coronavirus mess. Gave them a point or two for that too.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- If you're looking for real amateur Asian porn, or any real amateur porn this might be a site for you.
- Around 900 videos and 7,200 photo sets.
- I haven't seen any censored scenes.
- Small, but very candid and realistic photo sets that can be downloaded in zips, this is fairly rare for an amateur Asian site.
- Navigation does what it needs to do and little else.
- Mixture of solo, m/f, threesomes, lesbian.
- Newer videos are 1080p. Not for sure how rare that is for what looks to be a real amateur site.
- Very good download speeds (85%+ of my max) very important on Asian sites as some are very slow.
Cons:
- No model names (usually a sign of real amateurs).
- No update schedule or dates on the scenes.
- Older scenes are as low as 336p
Bottom Line:
As most of us know most "amateur" scenes in American and European porn feature a guy with a camera with women that often become porn stars. Those sites also usually have top of the line video cameras and the only thing that seems amateur is the camerawork and the model you've never seen before.
This site, My Cute Asian, feels as amateur as it gets. There are 6 minute scenes of a shy Asian woman masturbating in the hallway of an apartment complex. The site's size makes me think it's been around a long time and the oldest videos with an unheard of 336p resolution only make me believe it's as old as I'm thinking and as amateur as I'm thinking.
They don't have a set ethnicity from within the Asian race. There are Filipinas, Japanese, Chinese, Korean and several others represented. It looks almost like a user submitted site.
While it might not appeal to a lot, I think it does to some, zipped photo sets of amateur Asians are extremely rare. The photos range from clothed and teasing in public, to full nudity. I'm willing to admit I could be wrong on the amateur part of this site. Without names, I can't say I recognize any of these models. The one thing that does make me wonder about the production is a few of the models have "My Cute Asian" written on their bodies.
Even so, I believe it's mostly amateur. There's a large variance in looks of the models, some are well below average, others are well above average. Some look older (I would say up to 50. Others look not a day over 18.)
The big plus for me here are the public or semi-public scenes. It's certainly more taboo in Asian countries than European countries and even America.
The cons show the real weaknesses. If you see a model you like you're out of luck. With no names listed you're not likely going to find any other scenes of her. There's no update schedule or dates on the files. On the older scenes there's not even a screencap. It just has a short, descriptive link and you either click it to see what it is or download it and hope for the best.
Surprising to me, the download speeds go very high and since these are amateur videos, many are 10 minutes or less, so I can download them in 10-15 seconds. I have been on several sites from Asian countries that take forever to download a scene.
Don't hold me to this count as the later pages on the site have no screencaps and I'm just trying to add them up. By my count there are 5 videos horizontal, 10 vertical per page and there's 18 pages. That would be around 900 videos. The time of each ranges from 5 minutes to 30 minutes. The photos are also 5 horizontal and 10 vertical and there are 144 pages. That's in the 7,000 photo sets range. The sets have anywhere from 10 photos to 50 in each and all are downloadable.
It could all be organized better but because there's no model names there's really not a lot of ways to organize it. They do have categories but the only categories are nationalities. There's a lot more to like here than dislike.
I have reason to believe they are updating. They list their video count in the 600s and photos at 5600, those have both went up by about 30%.
They do have tags like "hairy", "Chinese" and quite a few others but there's no way to tell how accurate those are.
If this was a standalone site I would recommend it for amateur and Asian fans but it's not a standalone. This site full of mostly amateur content is hidden inside the Japan HDV network. I scored Japan HDV a 97 mostly just for its content. To see that they have other sites like this one makes me think I might have shorted Japan HDV with a 97. I've been a member for going on 5 months and just keep letting it recur.
I will mention that towards the last pages of this site's videos and pictures, I saw one or two models that had familiar names and seeing that 95% or more of the scenes don't tell the model's name maybe there are a few pros thrown in.
The videos are downloadable and the quality does vary which is also common on Asian sites. It's definitely worth a look especially with Japan HDV included and Teen Thais too. This seems like one of the best buys in porn.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very high quality network of mostly niche specific sites.
- Now includes 10 sites instead of the 7-8 usually advertised (see bottom line).
- One of the best, deepest, tag systems in the industry.
- Unlimited downloads of screencaps and videos.
- 1,176 mostly European models.
- Good download speeds.
- Much improved navigation from my last visit.
- Technical quality, especially on videos, could be unmatched or at worst is in the top 5%.
- Updates across the network every 5 days.
Cons:
- The last time I was here they had removed Give Me Pink, my favorite of the DEV 8 sites, it's back but it's not updating.
- Kind of like a book filled with pictures and no words. None of the sites feature anything close to a story which is the point of Gonzo but a lot of people don't know that.
Bottom Line:
Several years ago, I gave this network an average score by my standards. It probably wasn't fair of me but back then they just up and removed the Give Me Pink content in the middle of my subscription. You can look at the TBP review and see that Give Me Pink isn't listed as one of the sites in the "Network sites" but it is now included again as is Fist Flush which also isn't listed in the "Network sites" of the TBP review.
The interesting part is both Give Me Pink and Fist Flush are also included in the network Sapphix that comes with those two sites and Sapphic Erotica. This presents a new problem.
The three newest scenes on Give Me Pink included with Perfect Gonzo were released on 2/4/19, 3/31/17 and 3/13/17, making it nothing more than an archive site on Perfect Gonzo. On Sapphix, the three newest Give Me Pink scenes were released on 3/28/20, 3/23/20 and 3/13/20. Ugh.
I would guess Perfect Gonzo has some rights to the older Give Me Pink scenes and have those while Sapphix has the whole collection of Give Me Pink scenes including the newest scenes.
I won't take off as much as I did before since Perfect Gonzo at least has some of the older Give Me Pink scenes but make note if you're a Give Me Pink fan you'll need to also join Sapphix to get the newest updates since 2017.
One of the "negatives" with this network is some of these sites had long dead periods. Like MILF Thing, it had a gap between updates from 2008 to 2015 with 0 updates. That does cause a big difference in technical quality.
Having said that, it's also one their top pro. These guys have been shooting HD (720p in early 2007), (1080p in late 2007 and beyond) for longer than any site I know of. They started adding 4K in 2014. Even those old scenes are HD and worth downloading, especially for collectors.
Their extensive tagging system is one of the best in the industry though they do go a little too specific at times. To humor myself and you, you could search for a blonde, athletic model with an apple butt, teardrop boobs, light skin toned with a big clit, trimmed pubic hair, tattooed with green eyes, with a ponytail who's wearing a corset, having sex on the kitchen table with twerking that leads into anal gaping. That's some serious tagging options.
The download options since 2014 include 4K (12-20 GB each scene), 1080p, 720p, 540p and a mobile version. The newer photos/screencaps are downloadable in zips that are sometimes larger than 1GB each. Those photos are 5000 long end.
It's hard to argue against their technical excellence. The question becomes how important is Give Me Pink to you? To show the differences, I also have a Sapphix account and they have 405 Give Me Pink scenes while Perfect Gonzo only has 338. Being a lover of solo porn, Give Me Pink, is one of my favorite sites.
Something I found interesting, you all know Eve Angel was my favorite model from 2006-2013, her first Give Me Pink scene on Sapphix only has a 260p download (2004), the same scene on Perfect Gonzo has a 384p version.
In the perfect world we could just join both Sapphix and Perfect Gonzo which would add Sapphic Erotica to it all.
Overall, I think even without the newest 70 or so Give Me Pink scenes, Perfect Gonzo is a very good deal and network that excels at both quality and quantity ... unless you want a story with the scenes. They cover quite a few niches, most of the sex is hardcore, nearing rough, with 348 DP scenes, 1,096 anal scenes and we'll throw a more extreme one in with 583 scenes tagged as "throat fucking".
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that's about women having very visible, messy orgasms. Call it the opposite of a cumshot site.
- Smaller site than I realized with only 58 scenes but this is a relatively rare niche and they are updating once per week.
- Mostly top-level models that even I know of like Maya Bijou, Autumn Falls and Kali Roses.
- Very high technical quality on the videos.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max)
- Segpay for billing.
- Believable orgasms.
- Scenes average 35-45 minutes
- Unlimited downloads and streaming.
Cons:
- Tough con to talk about the size of the site. It's a newer site and those into this type of content would probably download all the scenes. Quantity vs Quality debate rages on.
- It could use a promo considering the size of the site.
- They have other sites that you can add on as a whole for $69 more. They also include each model's scenes from their other sites in the model list. It makes that $69 offer look more enticing. That's a con to me.
Bottom Line:
There's very few things I like better in sex or porn than seeing a woman's pleasure. Sites like this are not that common. You almost get the feeling the guys are competing to see how many times they can make the female they're paired with have an orgasm. It's a nice change of pace from scenes being focused on making the man cum.
Autumn Falls scene on here is the best scene I've seen her in. This site makes you wonder how many of the female models are holding back in other hardcore scenes on other sites. There is a relatively high percentage of both males and females that find their partner's pleasure more important than their pleasure. We don't see that much in porn.
Most of the action is pretty standard. Male/female, no threesomes or group sex or lesbian scenes. The only unique part about the content is the focus on the woman having orgasm(s). There's a certain level of tease in the scenes ... from the male. Not stripping or anything like that but pulling out as the woman starts to orgasm then penetrating and speeding up. Some of the orgasms the women have are those world-ending, mind-blowing, whole body shaking orgasms.
The technical side of the site stands out.
The videos can be downloaded in 4K, 1080p, the 720p option has two formats (mp4 and wmv) and 480p. That's on all 58 scenes.
The navigation could be better but since it's smaller site and all scenes are focused on the woman's orgasm it's not quite as important. There are no tags or search features. You just click scenes and they load up.
You do get some public content. Some of the scenes start with the model inserting a remote vibrator in herself and the male controlling it, could be by the pool, could be in a moving car.
You won't be shorted on orgasms. While Autumn Falls scene is my favorite of these, there are scenes with 7 orgasms, even 8 orgasms with other models. There are also squirting orgasms in some of the scenes. Notice my use of "some" that's because of the lack of tags. I would have to watch about 45 hours of these scenes to give exact numbers.
After joining, I realized adding the full package would have been a better option and deal but then again only a few of their other sites appeal to me. I've become a niche porn viewer. With the rare exceptions where there's a model I really like. I could watch Autumn Falls fall off a toilet and enjoy it.
I'm going above my average on the score since this niche is one I've always been interested in. It reminds me a little of the Japanese scenes where the men see how many times they can make the women orgasm. Add the very high quality of the videos and hopefully they'll keep adding new scenes every week. The pictures could be better quality, 1500 long end with zips and are the hybrid studio/screencap sets. This is where they film the model by herself to get 10 or so pictures/caps, usually fully clothed and going into tease, then the sets become screencaps from the video. Very good site for those into the niche, probably an average site to those not into the niche.
If I were to go back and reconsider my review of this site, my score would be even lower. I considered my 75 a fair score based on the photo sets I had seen. As I got deeper into the site the photo sets became shorter and not as good. I also was very frustrated with their method of splitting their videos up into parts and not doing it for any particular reason other than raising their video count numbers. A site would normally face major negative criticism for that. One of the members that reviewed it high also reviewed FTV Girls low and one of the cons they listed on FTV Girls was videos being split, yet they didn't count it as a con against Ersties.
Which is my point of Ersties splitting their videos for no particular reason. FTV Girls split their videos up as does In the Crack, to change locations, actions, outfits, Ersties split videos are just split to raise video count numbers. The newest review of it says in the bottom line, "They have interviews for each video- at the start, sometimes the end-" It wasn't that way when I was a member. They had full entire videos that were interviews. If you notice in that newest review besides saying the interviews are at the beginning or end of scenes, one of the cons they list is, "The number of videos is totaled including the interviews."
Which means the interviews are NOT at the beginning or end of scenes but are in fact separate videos also used to up their video counts. It's hard to believe someone that liked the site well enough to score it a 90 would contradict themselves in the same review by saying they are counted in the total then later saying they are at the beginning or end of scenes. If any of them or their site rep would like to disagree with what I've said they are welcome to. They don't realize all these positive reviews are drumming up attention. At least 2 established PU reviewers have told me they currently have 3 month accounts to the site.
Don't look for an argument. Three of the four comments are not on creampie sites. That's spamming. And outside of amateur sites, which these are not, the average porn scene has 9-12 edits in it. This same person posting as SophiaCarol has been doing this for nearly a year and their account was stopped so they got a new name. I also am trying to be helpful by telling the person to open a thread in the forum where it's not spamming and post all of the sites they know of that are doing it.
Would you do what I told you to do? Start a thread in the forum and you can post these stupid Spam comments about your obsession with condom hiding software? You are bumping down important comments. This is your second or third account you've done this with.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- If I reviewed it based just on subjectivity, the score would be a 100.
- Going on 5 years of having a membership here at least 9 out of 12 months of each year.
- One of the simplest sites to use despite being a very large site.
- Solo, public nudity, public flashing, exhibitionism, extreme insertions, and many of the models are being recorded for the 1st time.
- Technical aspects of the site and content are close to the top of the industry.
- Update rate has increased though not entirely set in stone, pretty common to get a new update every 4-5 days instead of once per week and went through a few months of a new update every 3 days.
- Photo sets are some of the best in the industry.
- Highest video download options are 4K with 12000 bitrate.
- Probably the prettiest amateur models you'll find on any site.
- Downloads are fast (85% of max speed)
- Tag system is one of the best I've used.
- Sorting features for finding models is also useful (all will be explained in BL)
Cons:
- The 1 point I took off is because I know so many are against the split videos. I've been a member on it for so long that I've picked up on why the videos are split and now prefer it.
- Filenames are still 01, 02, 03. I just make a folder for each model and download them to that but if a model has more than one scene it's still possible to get them mixed up.
Bottom Line:
I had told several members that I thought FTV was going to get my first and only 100 rating but I took 1 objective point off for the split videos. I used to take 10 off for it.
I'll talk about that first. The scenes are split to change locations, to change outfits, to change whatever action the model is doing. For me, a lover of exhibitionism, there are models on here that I'm really not that interested in except for their exhibitionism parts. I'll call that the fetish is greater than the model rule. On those, being able to just download one 5-10 minute exhibitionism clip of the model is a lot better than downloading a 60 minute video that I'll only watch the first 5-10 minutes of.
I'm sure there are people that like the masturbation better and fast-forward the exhibitionism, they can just download the masturbation parts and don't have to download the full video.
I think that split video format reminds us too much of the old days when you would be watching a porn scene only to realize you hadn't downloaded the 2nd part and the 1st part stopped mid-sex. That's not what FTV is doing with the split scenes.
The tagging system is one of my favorite parts of FTV. Each scene has a row of icons on it. These icons tell you what happens in the scene, "1st time on camera", "public nudity" and it's the easiest to use tagging system. See above, I like the exhibitionism, I can find those scenes with one click.
You then have the models. FTV Girls is close to 1,500 models and to me they're all attractive, maybe not all are my types but all are attractive. You will see some pros and most of those filmed for FTV before they were pros, not all. I always thought one of the best examples was Eva Angelina who was very early in her porn career and while she isn't shy on FTV she's nothing like she became in hardcore porn.
There are many models on here that you'll wish had more content on other sites too. It's one of the few sites that makes you think, "How could she stop at these 4 photo sets and 100 minutes of video?"
The exhibitionism, while maybe toned down a little, is still very much a part of the site and the 18-19 years of archives. They have changed their public nudity tag to say, "Risky flashing and getting naked in public places". Which means even the scenes not tagged that way still often have some light flashing. That's the big selling point for me. I would join just for those parts.
When you search the potentially overwhelming model list you can filter by date of release, alphabetical, age, height and bra size. You, of course, can use the tags too. It's one of the most complete and easy to use (once you get the hang of it) navigation systems I've used.
The technical quality continues their excellence. The newer photo sets have a 5000 long end option that you can download. You can also download a smaller resolution as well. The current videos have 480p, 1080p and 4K with above average bitrates to match the resolutions. Even the 480p has a 3000+ bitrate.
They have something I think a lot of sites should add and that's a sneak peek section to show you the next couple of updates so you know what's coming up. It also shows the more frequent update schedule I mentioned earlier. They had a new set on 3/17/20, have another coming on 3/21/20 and another on 3/27/20. They're upped their game there. I was happy with one per week.
These updates are worth mentioning as well as they're not one video and one photo set. These updates come with 250-500 photos (spread across 4-5 sets/different outfits and locations) and 70-100 minutes of video. They could, if they wanted, release one photo set a day and one section of the video and I would guess say they have an update everyday.
They have a bonus section that has several hundred outtakes, public flashing, models masturbating in the car on the ride to the setting for the shoot and these are all FTV models so you can get some extra content of your favorite models. Some are photos, some are 3-5 minute videos and it's worth looking into these since I've found some very good videos that I don't know why they're not mixed in with the regular shoot.
The total amount of content is nearing 10,000 photo sets/videos and here's a few breakdowns by tags:
Nearly 1,000 of the models have some content listed as Public Nudity.
Nearly 900 of the models are listed as 1st time filmed.
Those two alone are enough for me to stick around as long as I have. The photo sets, besides the technical numbers, feature the models in normal, everyday clothes, especially if you've ever been to the west coast of the United States. When I started getting bored with glam models, I started joining FTV more (around 2013) and to me the models are very natural looking and acting for American models. There's also some ethnic diversity. I keep trying to find something to complain about but it's not working. I personally think it's the best all-around porn site on the internet.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very large, (mostly) amateur network.
- 21 sites with only a couple having pro models.
- Very genuine, amateur feel to the models, it can range from uncomfortable to nervous to excited reactions from the models.
- No real specific look to the models, there are girl next door types, tattooed and pierced models, small, slender, heavier, chunky, tall, which I think helps the genuine amateur feel.
- Newer videos have 4K option, 1080p and 480p.
- Excellent photo sets that can be downloaded.
- Very good TBP/PU discount price.
- Offers one of the broadest ranges of models based on ethnicity/race.
- Segpay is the biller
Cons:
- Outdated site design but it works very well.
- The part I think you have to accept with any amateur site, there's going to be some models you're not attracted to.
- Pre-checked cross sale on sign-up
Bottom Line:
Chickpass has grown over many years into one of the premier amateur sites. The site design could turn some off but like the old saying don't judge a book by its cover.
You get different sites with this network that almost work more like genres or niches. One is College Amateurs, one is T&A Asians, another is T&A Latinas and I think you get my drift. Or you can just go to the Chickpass Adult Network which works as a hub page. The size of the network is impressive. There are over 2,000 models. Over 7,000 videos and around 3,500 photo sets.
That's a lot of mostly amateur content. It's one of the good uses of the different sites. One is Chickpass Pornstars, so if you don't like pornstars, you can just avoid going to it.
The scenes vary from solo masturbation/tease to hardcore boy/girl with some lesbian content including a site dedicated to lesbian content. There are some threesomes as well.
One of my favorite parts is it seems like they just let the models control their outfits, so you'll have some cosplay, some women in tights/leggings, because it's amateur you're going to see tattoos, some bushes, some shaven. It's one of those sites where there is something for everyone.
I do think it could be overwhelming for some since this is a lot of content of models a lot of us haven't seen before.
The navigation is a major plus. First, you have the different "sites" which also works for specifying what you're looking for (Asians, Lesbians, Latinas, etc...), second it has a well-organized model list and third, it has a hub page to bring it all together. There are also tags including resolution, so if you just want 4K scenes, you can click the tag for it. The tags are accurate as far as I can tell.
Maybe the outdated style of the site wouldn't lead you to believe it has nice, newer style of navigation features but it does and they work well.
Using the tags it says they have around 400 scenes in 4K and over 5,000 scenes with at least 1080p, again very impressive numbers for an amateur site.
Of course, a big selling point for me is the various races of the models. That might be my favorite part of porn sites these days. If I could throw a minor complaint in it would be that I would like to see bigger pictures. They don't have to be 6000 long end but the ones I'm downloading are only 1600 long end. Maybe at least up in the 2500 - 3000 long end range?
You'll be surprised with how many major stars you find here before they were even porn stars. That adds a collectible side to the site for us collectors that like to have photos/videos from various points in a model's career.
They don't do much wrong and cover a lot of niches/fetishes.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- No network has improved more and hits on more niches and fetishes than Pure CFNM.
- 6 site included with subscription.
- CCBill is the biller, haven't seen them in awhile.
- 1,409 scenes as of 3/17/2020.
- Averages 5-6 updates per week across the network.
- Has a feature all networks should have. Will explain in BL.
- Categories are accurate.
- A current total of 680 models.
Cons:
- Some of the degradation goes too far. I hold the same feeling with males towards females and females towards males. Some scenes include the women spitting in the man's face.
- Some of the more specialized sites like Lady Voyeurs could use a little more action or interaction from the ladies.
Bottom Line:
Just about hit the 100 button. Then she spit in his face. I've been a fan of CFNM for close to 10 years. The Pure CFNM network died off for a little while several years ago then came back with a vengeance.
These are the sites with a brief explanation: Pure CFNM the flagship site, this is a mixture of niches within the CFNM niche and has what I would call their most accessible scenes.
Lady Voyeurs is women watching men masturbate. This is the one with a lot more potential than I think they realize. The women have to become more involved, some do.
Amateur CFNM is what it says, these tend to have more sex in them and they're all worth a look and download.
CFNM Games was a short-lived site with only 24 scenes. These are okay.
Girls Use Guys is a major hit or miss site. Some of the scenes are some of the best on the network, others are trying too hard to be degrading to the man.
Hey Little Dick is degradation, some of it's a little funny at times. I don't see it as bad as the spitting ones.
The basis of CFNM is Clothed Female Nude Male. It doesn't always work out that way. I would say more times than not it ends up being as much female nudity as male. I've explained my interest in it. I'm a big guy, every woman I've ever been with becomes submissive and I like seeing women being aggressive since it's not something I experience much in life. And when I do, I usually end up laughing.
The quality here is very good. The options for downloading are basic with 480p, 720p and 1080p. You can also download pictures. There aren't any 4K scenes that I've seen.
The feature I mentioned in the pros is when you're in the hub page each scene has a little icon that tells you which site it's from. It seems like that should be standard for networks these days but this is one of the only ones I've seen it on.
I do think Lady Voyeurs has the most untapped potential. It shows in their scenes when the woman gets more involved instead of just sitting and watching the guy masturbate. You get a lot of fetishes here. The women are usually at least a little clothed by the end of the scene so you get the cum on clothes fetish, you get the handjob that turns into a blowjob that turns into sex. I think you could say there's exhibitionism and voyeurism as well.
The female models are not as well known to me as others. The majority are at least average or above average in looks.
I really don't think they have much room to improve. The degradation scenes seem to be toned down now.
There's also no ads or upsell offers. It's very close to being the best site for me. My fiancee enjoys it so that's a major plus. Would recommend it to anyone that's looking for something that goes against the grain.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- For me, the best handjob site on the internet (Manojob) with two other so-so sites.
- Good navigation, seamlessly move between the sites.
- Decent blend of models, most are younger and white but there is enough diversity not to count it against them.
- Active and helpful webmaster, didn't have any problems this time but have in the past. Responds fast and is courteous.
- Manojob wins me over with this network especially with the "pussy tease" scenes. That's one of my more recent fetishes and they do it well.
- Rocketgate as the biller is back in pros for now. They made me email to cancel recently but the most recent cancel was automated so maybe it was just a glitch.
Cons:
- It's a tough con to hit them with but there is recycling and I understand why. I will explain in BL.
- Mr POV and The Dick Suckers haven't interested me. Take that more as a compliment towards Manojob.
- Updates are no longer dated, three of the four first listed scenes on Manojob are scenes I already have.
Bottom Line:
My apologies to MarcDC. I had already planned on reviewing this network as it has one of my favorite sites in it, Manojob. I normally wouldn't post a review of the same site as someone else on the same day but I don't think our reviews are that far apart either.
Manojob was the first handjob site I remember joining. Before that I would go to Videobox or some other DVD site and download their handjob DVDs. At first, Manojob didn't do a lot to separate itself from the DVDs but over time they started working the pussy tease in, some call it the cameltoe slide.
Mr. POV is an okay site. Anything in gonzo style these days starts to become repetitive to me. The Dick Suckers same problem. They're average sites if that makes it fair.
In the cons I mentioned that there is recycling. I understand that these guys are a small team. They have times where they're filming and can't knock out brand new updates every other day or even every week so they rotate and older, popular scene in as a new update. I'm not going to take off points for it. I'm familiar enough with this site, their webmaster, that I know he busts his ass trying to get quality content up.
The problem for me is scenes get removed to use as new updates. Rear Admiral reviewed the site in 2015 with 1,400+ scenes, TBP reviewed it in 2017 with 1,307 scenes, I reviewed it in 2017 and there was only 1,266 scenes. I made note that the month I reviewed it in had 31 updates in 30 days. This is one of those situations where the webmaster is a nice enough guy if he would just put everything back up and say he could only get 2-4 updates a month, I think it would look better. We know he's not a major production studio and we appreciate the hard work to keep up.
Still not taking points off for it but as of today, 3/17/2020, there are 1,273 scenes. That's 6 more scenes than when I reviewed it 2.5 years ago.
Manojob is still the best handjob site, tease site, in porn.
The scenes are not as basic as they used to be. They've incorporated JOE or JOI, Jerk Off Encouragement and Jerk Off Instruction. The women don't just kneel down and jerk the guy off like old handjob sites did. They now get naked, half-naked, and grind their bodies against the guy's dick. You'll even get a few slipped in penetrations. Those parts are what puts them ahead of everyone else. I'm not even for sure it's that close.
The videos are downloadable in 720p, 1080p, they also have the cumshot only video, a SD version, a mobile version and interview with each model.
I'm going to tell you the scene to watch to see the eroticism handjob porn can have, Teanna Trump, Class of 2014. They should have paid her 10x what they did and I don't know what they paid her.
The downside as I said the last time I reviewed the whole network is I don't see the other two sites coming close to that type of eroticism. They're doing something very rare with the Manojob content. It makes the other two sites feel very plain.
I'm raising my score quite a bit from the last time I reviewed the whole network. That's because the network as a whole frustrated me the previous time I reviewed it. I was frustrated with the disappearing videos. I'm going as high as I can go for the network just because I don't know how much new content they are putting out. They have around 10 4K scenes according to their tag search. If they keep up the Manojob updates and keep working on that erotic part, maybe I would go a little higher.
It would be my first choice recommendation to someone into tease and handjobs just because of Manojobs. Some people would add more for the other two sites. I have never downloaded anything from either. I have watched a few scenes to see if I thought it was worth a download.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Interracial standalone Team Skeet site.
- Only 124 scenes and the update schedule is inconsistent but the scenes are good.
- Much like other Team Skeet standalone, the scenes are long averaging over 40 minutes.
- Decent but stereotypical storylines.
- Very pretty female models.
- I feel like a broken record, 480, 540, 720 and 1080p video downloads.
- Pictures and screencaps and both can be downloaded.
- Epoch is still the biller on this one.
Cons:
- Poor updating schedule, in late 2018 they were updating 3 times a month, then it dropped to once per month, now you might not get any updates (see bottom line).
- The humor is there but the stereotypical storylines kind of ruins it.
- Ads and upsells
Bottom Line:
This one might push my ability to get enough of a bottom line. The Team Skeet standalone sites have really set a high standard. This one while good, doesn't feel like they're in their comfort zone. The majority of the storylines are somewhere along the lines of black male athlete, usually 6'4" or taller, ends up in tiny white woman's house. This makes this site or hit or miss and that's unusual for these Team Skeet standalone sites. Some of the scenes are really good. Other ones you'll be lucky to make it to the sex part.
The technical numbers are good with 480p to 1080p videos, photos and screencaps. There are 144 models on the site and based on the Team Skeet rankings, I don't think I'm the only one that believes this isn't one of their better sites. It only ranks #31. Which is the lowest of their standalone sites with at least 100 scenes.
It's not a complete loss. I found 23 scenes I liked enough to download and plan to keep.
Maybe one of the hardest parts to understand is the lack of updates. They were updating 3 times a month heading into 2019. Since January 2019 to March 2020, they have had 11 scenes. It gets worse. Seven of those months had 0 updates. They've had one in January 2020 and one in February 2020 but none so far in March. Maybe it's because it's not doing well for them?
A 79 is a pretty low score from me so be aware of that if you're thinking that's not too bad. My average score is 86. There is the positive of Epoch instead of Rocketgate which some of the Team Skeet standalone sites have switched to. The easier to cancel it with. I think this site is about ready to be sent to the Team Skeet network.
I would recommend it if there are models on it that you're into but there are better interracial sites (Dogfart, Blacked, Blacked Raw).
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The best kept secret in porn. Sorry, Cherry Pimps.
- I'm going to put this as a pro as it's not their problem, they have live cam shows that are very good but are currently suspended because of the Coronavirus.
- One of the most impressive networks in terms of technical quality (see bottom line).
- Nearly 1,400 models
- They average an update per day
- 4 Live channels/shows that they keep an archive of.
- Some hidden gems in here like the reason I found Cherry Pimps a few years ago, Aaliyah Love's solo site is in here. She has over 300 scenes here.
- They have the Cherry of the Month where they pick one model and they release new videos and photos of her throughout the month.
- Very good download speeds (80-85% of max)
Cons:
- It could be better laid out. (see bottom line)
- The tags could be better. They have some tags that have 2-3 scenes and there's tags they're missing. It's not a big deal but you have to nitpick these guys. It's one of the best networks on the internet.
- Maybe could use a boost in creativity. Scenes can become repetitive here.
Bottom Line:
The very first time I joined this network, I didn't even know it was a network. I joined Aaliyah Love's solo site. I noticed there were some other sites but I was focused on Aaliyah's site. Then, I joined Cherry Pimps and there was Aaliyah Love's solo site. Their history isn't real clear to me. At one time, I think they had 4 or 5 solo sites and still might. It doesn't show itself as a network anymore. It's one big site with everything mixed in.
You have to be ready to prowl around and see what you can find.
The Cherry of the Month is a big selling point to me since I was a huge fan of Twisty's Treat of the Month. It works very similar to that and last month, Vina Sky was the Cherry of the Month.
The technical quality is different here than a lot of sites. I think they might be the only one that does this. The newer videos have:
4K
1080p @ 20mbps
1080p @ 15mbps
1080p @ 10mbps
720p
480p
They give you three bitrate options on the 1080p videos and all of these options come with your membership. No extra charges.
They have full photo sets, screencaps, plus the live shows. I know that Rear Admiral wondered how he could have missed this site. It's really not been around that long. A lot of that older content was from the old network that Aaliyah Love's site was on. TBP has Cherry Pimps first listed in 2012.
The content might be the weakest part. It's gonzo type porn. Very little stories or anything to draw you in. It reminds me a lot of the old Twistys site. You went for the models and that's exactly how it feels here. If you're an Aaliyah fan they have over 300 scenes of her. For those that like dirty talk, you don't know what you're missing if you've not watched her solo porn.
It then becomes a treasure hunt as you dig through the pages and pages of models. They have some models here that I'm not used to seeing much of like Lylith LaVey, she normally wouldn't catch my eye but she did and she became one of my favorites on here.
The Cherry of the Month is one of the best features a site can do. Ever once in awhile they'll get one I don't really like but most of the time it's either a model I like or I start liking.
There's a little of everything here as well. They have over 3,000 solo scenes. You're not going to get through this site in a month. I'm currently on my 6th month and I still haven't found everything.
It could be recommended to almost anyone that's into porn. My score isn't probably as high as it should be. The site has changed on me. This is not the same site it was in 2017. It's probably losing a few points because I can't find what I'm looking for.
They do promote the pimp.xxx network and it was cross-sale when I joined. I don't know if maybe some of the content I'm looking for went to that network. If you join it plan on staying awhile.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of those niches I wish had more representation in porn.
- Very pretty models, they seem to be selective in the models.
- Updates have slowed over the last few months but they still have at least one new scene per week.
- Most models have multiple scenes, sets and outfits.
- Three download options on videos, 720p, 1080p and 4K.
- Downloadable photo sets, very high, professional quality.
- Various ages, doesn't seem to stick to any age group.
Cons:
- The last time I reviewed this site I gave a tip in it and they didn't listen. This is supposed to be women in a fitting room. There should be some noise or chatter. I was hoping they had fixed that but they haven't.
- Very little diversity in the models except for age. Nearly all models are white and slender.
- Needs a boost of oomph, scenes seem clinical at times.
Bottom Line:
As an admitted fetishist of dressing room porn, I honestly believe you could give me the controls of a site like this and I could make it into a top site.
Years ago, one of my exes would send me pictures from the dressing room in a store. It seriously became a near obsessive fetish of mine. I was the dumbass saying, "Go try on some more clothes" knowing I would have to pay for them if she liked them.
What that site is to me is a new twist on solo porn. For roughly half of the video the model changes clothes, poses, takes pictures of herself and this is supposed to be turning her on. After 10 minutes of this teasing, she sits down or sometimes stands and masturbates.
On that part of it they do fine. The dressing room part is mostly lost. These are critical to a scene playing to this fetish:
Outside noise. What good is it to masturbate in an indoor dressing room if you don't believe someone is just outside the door?
Attempted holding in of moans. There's none of that here. These women are moaning like they are in the privacy of their bedroom with no one within 1,000 ft of them.
Have them nude while opening the door. I do like that they vary the panties, the pantyhose, the outfits, and they have some really pretty models.
I think the easiest way to point out the biggest negative is it's like there is no thought or production. I think I described it before as the model is just sitting inside a box on a set. When you do fetish content, how believable it is, is very important.
The numbers show 153 scenes which is much higher than when I was last here and they only had 58. I don't like bashing the model choices but they started out this site with Apolonia and Lil' Caprice. They're still the two models I know on the site. Most of these other models are completely new to me but I'm sure they're not amateurs.
Their technical quality is as good as you can ask for. Every scene has 720p, 1080p and 4K resolution videos. The photos are almost 6000 long end and downloadable.
They're doing so much right it's just the content isn't as good as it could be. This comes across as a very softcore site but it's not. There's anal play, dildos, Magic Wands, it's moderate level or higher masturbation.
I think they would even be better off just forgetting the dressing room part. This is going to be a bad analogy but it's like a site calling itself shower masturbation. And the person gets in the shower without turning the shower on and masturbates.
You could probably say this is the exact type site that's not good for obsessive people. It's still a good, solo, panties, pantyhose, masturbation site with some of the best technical standards.
As far as I know there are two types of dressing room fetishes. One is what this site does. You get to watch what goes on in the dressing room. The other is, the risk, almost exhibitionism, taboo style and of course that would be the one I'm into.
I think my score is somewhat objective. I try to bring as much subjectivity to reviews as I can but I'm sure there's people into this and it's really good at what it does. I guess it's just not perverted enough for me. I'll continue to keep tabs on this site. I'm sure they will have to change things up eventually.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- For my money, the best interracial network on the internet.
- I'm counting 23 sites, including some of the groundbreaking sites in the genre.
- Gloryhole and Gloryhole Initiations are enough to me. Those two sites alone have nearly 1,000 Gloryhole scenes on them.
- 5,650 total scenes according to their member's area homepage, 1,270 models, 900,000+ pictures.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max).
- Good enough navigation for a network this size. The hub page is quite useful and you don't have to sign into each site.
- The only thing limited is they charge extra for 4K.
- Some of the sites are sleepers to me and I mean that in a good way. You could easily look over Zebra Girls which is a very good interracial lesbian site.
- Two gay sites as well, they're covering most of the bases.
- Epoch is the biller
Cons:
- Once you go to each site it becomes a scroll fest. I think I once commented that I broke my scroll wheel on this network.
- They have some but I would like to see more black girls with white guys. Surely if you can make a great network last 20+ years with the name Dogfart you can find some more black girls.
- Some recycling going on
Bottom Line:
Dogfart has been around so long that the first time I ever watched a porn scene online it was by them and it took all night to download it on a dial-up connection. I'm throwing a little humor in here, some of their youngest models were not even born when Dogfart started. That's impressive.
I'm going to list the sites you receive and total amount of scenes each site has. I always felt like Dogfart was a broad network. There's some content on here I never look at and there's some I always join for so seeing the number counts will help with others like me so they can see how much content has been added to their favorite site(s).
I'll be blunt, I don't like the solo sites they have and really would be okay with just having Gloryhole, Gloryhole Initiations, Watching Mom/Daughter Go Black, Zebra Girls, We Fuck Black Girls and Black on Blondes.
Which I think shows what I mean when I say it's a broad network.
It's very hard to say how often they are updating since all their sites have their most recent scenes listed as 2020. They are definitely recycling on some of these sites. There's a comment on one that says 2020 release date and the comment was in 2013. I'm not going to take off for it since it's on the sites I don't like.
Gloryhole porn was one of the first fetishes I realized I had. That goes into that suspension of belief and you wonder what your girlfriend or wife would do if she was in a bathroom and a dick popped through a hole in the wall. It was an early one for me so I was probably just in my early 20s.
Their style of interracial porn is better than other interracial sites, for me. Dogfart takes care of my interests in interracial porn.
If you're into 4K, you're not going to be happy. They currently have a spring break special of upgrading each scene to 4K for $3.99 PER scene. I don't watch 4K. Not a big deal to me. They have good camerawork, I would call it professional, their 1080p and 720p videos are very clear on my 1080p television.
The amount of content will keep you busy for a long time and I continue to believe we should elevate these networks that are not charging us extra for HD downloads.
I think I've said this before. These are not the prettiest female models, not in an overall view, they have some pretty models here but some of them are average at best.
I think Gloyhole stands out there since they seem to get better looking models on it and of course the Gloryhole scenes have evolved. They're now having sex through the Gloryhole, not just blowjobs. You can tell they've tried adding small parts like the woman masturbating a little before the dick pops through the hole in the wall.
I haven't run into any download limits and the site works well. To the other side of it, the older scenes really need to be remastered.
It's a lot of content and it's a site I join once a year to catch up on my favorite sites listed above.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- My favorite, most entertaining site about "family porn". It's the only one I've joined multiple times.
- They are up to 263 scenes, the last time I reviewed it, 7/3/17, they only had 113 scenes.
- Each update has a video, photos, screencaps and all can be downloaded. They update once a week and it's another rare site where nearly every update is worth downloading.
- Download speeds are always very good (90%), almost too fast since it makes it nearly impossible to do anything else on the internet while downloading.
- Terrible acting that is a pro. They're not even trying. It does make it entertaining and less "creepy".
- Long scenes that showcase and highlight all that poor acting. Average scene is around 45 minutes. If you ever wanted comedy porn this is near it.
Cons:
- Switched billers to Rocketgate, I have good experiences with Rocketgate and a couple of recent annoying ones. It used to be Epoch.
- Navigation can be frustrating.
- It's a Team Skeet standalone site but you get all the ads and frustration (see bottom line).
Bottom Line:
Family Strokes is a site I really fell for back in 2017. There's just enough taboo feeling (if you concentrate enough), there's humor, there's very attractive models and it's consistent. Consistency is something I think is often overlooked in porn. These guys have hit their zone with this site.
The numbers are now plenty good with 263 scenes. Every scene has 480, 540, 720 and 1080 resolutions available for download. They have real photo sets not just screencaps and you can download those. If you like screencaps they have those for download too.
They're updating once a week. I think they could improve that a little but go back to my cons. There is a certain level of frustration here. It's only going to get worse as they add more scenes. Navigation is limited to ... that. Nothing. You can get away from the mess of ads by going to "sites" and selecting Family Strokes. Once inside you can click the model's name and it will show her content across the network including on sites you don't have access to. Which means you're stuck with just scrolling through the 263 scenes. They have a model that I have seen before but hadn't paid much attention to her named Sofie Reyez. I clicked her name and it shows me 15 of 14 scenes. How does that even happen? And I only have access to 1 of them. You can't even use the model list without getting ALL their scenes.
Enough bitching but they do need to fix that. The scenes here are like most family porn scenes except I think the Team Skeet producers have fun with it. You will even see the models laugh when they're supposed to be most serious. Yes, your stepbrother just pulled his hard dick out, stop smiling! I don't know the Team Skeet guys but many years ago here on PU, I reviewed a couple of their sites and they were so excited about it and offered me t-shirts, keychains and you can tell they don't take themselves too seriously.
That's a plus for me. This is a niche that Japanese porn does better than anyone if you want it realistic. These guys do it the opposite.
They have 359 models on this site alone. They got stepsisters and stepcousins. You might want to skip the beginning of some of them. The humor sometimes, at least for me, outdoes the sex.
You all think I'm exagerrating about how deep the stepfamily goes here. One of the newer scenes is Sexy Selfies for her Stepgrandpa. I laughed when I typed it. You even have Supervised Stepsibling Sex.
Once you get by the humor you have a really good porn site. The cons hurt a little on the score. That navigation will get worse over time. I've heard they're going to offer a bigger network package or whatever the hell they call it. It would help the navigation problems.
I've not canceled this one yet so Rocketgate better not give me no shit this time. The last one they told me my account didn't exist so I couldn't cancel it. Then, I had to email them and they found the account that didn't exist. That does hurt a little too.
I join it twice a year despite the problems and that's probably the best compliment I can give it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The future best lesbian site on the internet. As long as they keep updating.
- Only 73 scenes currently but 70 of them are 70 of the best lesbian scenes I've seen in years.
- Updates every 3-4 days.
- Top-tier models in every scene.
- Scenes are full of story and are in the 35-45 minute range each.
- Epoch is the biller.
- 95 models, various ages, most are in their teens/twenties.
- Excellent navigation and clean layout. It's a new site. Tags are accurate.
Cons:
- Size of the site has to be mentioned here.
- Price of the site is not going to be popular at $19.95 for streaming and $29.95 for downloading.
- Comes with no other sites.
Bottom Line:
Lesbian porn was my second favorite porn genre behind solo back 10-15 years ago but maybe more than any genre, lesbian porn has just slacked.
This site is owned by the group that owns Jules Jordan, a very good producer, director and actor. You can see the quality here both technically and in production values.
The videos have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 480p and 360p download options. The picture sets rival the top photo sites in both quality (technical and editing). Pictures are studio photo sets and top out at 4000 high end with zip downloads available. They also have screencaps as well.
The scenes remind me of Viv Thomas' heyday, back when a producer put two or more beautiful women in front of a camera and told them to go at it.
There are stories in each scene. These stories are even believable. Like two older real estate agents seducing a younger woman who is looking to buy a house. The model list just brought me up to date on the who's who of newer models. How have I not seen Alina Lopez before? Her scene on here with London River just went into my top 10 lesbian scenes of all-time. Have producers just slacked on this Alina Lopez and what looks like a lizard tongue?
The scenes are sensual, sometimes rough, there's licking everywhere, tribbing or scissoring whichever you prefer. There's kissing. There's a man walking around in the area of the house behind them without even noticing them. That's porn.
Most of the scenes do have the younger/older side to them but not near as extreme in the age difference. Stepmom finds out her stepdaughter is dating a girl and starts lecturing on how it's wrong, stepdaughter shows her why it's right.
My leaning here is Jules Jordan or whoever owns it went all in and decided they were finally going to make a lesbian site that whether realistic or not, showcases multiple naked women enjoying themselves and each other.
One of the big positives that didn't make its way into the pros is the models all speak English. If you're a Viv Thomas fan you know a lot of his lesbian scenes were great but hardly no English.
When do you ever watch a 40 minute scene and think, "I wish that was longer"? I did it here.
Here's some models that really stand out to me including the ageless wonder that is Brandy Love, Alina Lopez (she's in 8 scenes here), Adriana Chechik, Adira Allure, a personal favorite I haven't found much of Alex Coal, Autumn Falls, Cecilia Lion, Eliza Ibbara, Emily Willis and the shocker for me ... Georgia Jones. I thought she retired years ago? The always welcome Gina Valentina. The model list alone sells this site. I want to retire from my regular job and become the cameraman on this site.
I worked that in to compliment the cameraperson. Lesbian porn camerawork is very important and you won't miss hardly anything here, from a pretty 22 year old's tongue licking around an older woman's butthole at closeup, to the lost art of filming tribbing. The best filming of it is when the camera gets close enough to see the wet pussy lips sticking together and they do it here.
The size of the site might be a problem for some but it's not for me. I just hope they maybe come through with a promo. Especially if they're going to continue to update regularly and have this high of level models on it. I would join for a year just to see how great this site is going to become.
If it's an added plus, the site has only been updating since August 25, 2019 and they're already at 75 scenes. Maybe Jules is going to throw together a network with his own site and the other sites that group owns?
I would still just join this one for a year if a decent price was available. I think this is also as close to a porn site has got to with porn for men and women. It's not always soft and delicate, it's not always hard and violent but it has a little of all.
I can't say a new site that's not based on some weird fetish I have from high school, has impressed me this much ever.
My favorite scenes include the models starting out with light kissing and fingering themselves. That's not common these days. The acting is even good.
I didn't leave her out on purpose but there are 3 Vina Sky scenes here that are some of her best work. The threesome with Scarlett Sage and Adria Rae is really creative and enjoyable.
The cons are not big deals to me. I probably won't join it more than 3-4 times a year unless the price comes down a little but getting me to join a site 3-4 times a year these days is something only a few sites can do. I also would recommend it to collectors and you know you have to do the download option. I just download everything, videos, photos, screencaps.
It's as high as I'll go on a score for a site this size and hope they'll keep pushing it with the creativity and top models. It has 100 potential.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Tainster which is now part of Sinx is still around and maybe less impressive in total numbers, but more impressive in quality than they were.
- 15 sites are included.
- Navigation is far easier to use on this Sinx version of Tainster (but see cons).
- Party Hardcore, Fully Clothed Sex, Mad Sex Party, were and still are pioneering sites.
- Easy cancel with vxsbill
- Good download speeds (75-80% of max)
Cons:
- Well, they don't have near as much content as they used to have. Bottom line will explain why.
- No longer exclusive.
- Navigation is easy since there's no real navigation. You choose your site. The scenes show up. No model list.
- No update schedule or dates on scenes, some scenes are split into parts to inflate video count.
Bottom Line:
Tainster formerly Erromaxx (spelling?) has long been a network for those with different interests in porn than as the Clockwork Orange taught us, just the "Ol' in and out".
If you go to Videosz and look at the studios for "Seventeen" you'll find a lot of Tainster's old content on there on DVDs like Party Hardcore Best of Volume. That's why it's not exclusive anymore, but there is a positive to it.
The content that's now on the Tainster sites is all HD quality. Which was for a long time a negative against them since they had scenes going back to 2005. Those were often 480p at best.
This new version of Tainster is like a slimmed down, trimmed the fat off version. I can say some of these scenes are new to me. I hadn't been a member since 2015. The camerawork in the group, party scenes has also improved. I'm guessing they are using an editing tool since if you were ever a member of Party Hardcore, they would have cameras switching from one area to another every few minutes. It looks like they have put together the best parts and made those into scenes on the group sites.
The problem is there's a lot of fat cut off. Mad Sex Party has 64 scenes on it. When you look closer it's really just about 15-16 scenes as they're cut into 30 minute parts.
That problem only presents itself on the group scene sites.
My personal favorite site on their network is Fully Clothed Sex. I'm a pervert. I know that. I like seeing panties slid over and cum squirting on a woman's pretty sweater. They still do Fully Clothed Sex better than anyone ... except the Japanese. They have around 350 Fully Clothed Sex scenes so you can see they've not licensed it out on the level of Mad Sex Party and Party Hardcore. Two of the scenes on Fully Clothed Sex are listed as "new". I have no idea of knowing if they are. I don't have them in my collection so I'll take their word on it.
For those into the harsher side of porn they have the site Tyrannized. This can range from serious flogging to even burning each other with a lit cigarette. It's not really my interest but it also shows what a broad audience they could appeal to.
As for their pioneering ways, Party Hardcore, while not officially considered a CFNM site, was one of the first sites I saw CFNM porn. It was the flagship site for many years. This site has one major strength beyond other CFNM sites. It's set in a club where there are 50+ women and these male strippers walk around until one or two or twenty of the women start grabbing them, giving them blowjobs, having sex with them in front of everyone and the best part to me always was when two of women started having sex. It is a smaller version of the site. They not only have a small selection of the original Party Hardcore content, they also have all the "alternate cams" which shows the other side of licensing their content out.
As confusing as this might seem it's really not that confusing. They've licensed out their SD (480p content) and focused on their better quality content. If you only like HD or higher they've done you a huge favor. If you were able to enjoy the 480p and even lower older scenes, you might not be as happy about the change.
I think that's okay since it does show different women from each cam. It's just the number of total scenes you're going to get is very small just like on Mad Sex Party.
The rest of the sites seem fine and mostly untouched. If I remember right, they only had a few of these sites in their earliest years so maybe they didn't have a lot of SD content on those to remove.
The price is too high in my opinion unless you want to join it for a month and get what you want. As a network as a whole, it's easily one of the most unique. I raised the score from my previous review since they made it easier for me to find the high technical quality scenes.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Older/younger porn which I didn't expect since it's GrandparentsX. Some major fetishes explored here.
- Up to 4K on the video downloads, also 1080, 720 and 540.
- 35 videos and 34 photo sets, no download limits. While the amount of content is low, I downloaded every scene and have kept them for the fetishes they go into (will explain in BL). Also has 8 videos that I guess are from another of their sites, you can only stream those.
- The younger female models are very attractive, I would say top-tier quality.
- Download speeds are good (80% of my max).
- No ads but they do list scenes from their other sites.
Cons:
- Small collection. This is the only reason the score isn't higher.
- Sporadic updates, each of the last two months only have one official update with both months also having a "bonus" update you can stream. In January, they had 3 updates. December only had 1 official and 1 "bonus".
- Scenes could be longer, 4 people in a 22 minute scene is a little shorter than I would like.
Bottom Line:
This is one of those sites that appealed to me simply because I saw some of the fetishes it includes.
I'm not a big fan of old and young porn. Especially when it's one older person with one younger person. I don't see the taboo of it and am not quite old enough to really enjoy older men with younger women.
But this site, it has threesomes and foursomes. This means you see scenes where a younger guy is pounding away at a much older woman while his pretty, young girlfriend masturbates while watching them. There are scenes that go into swinging with young couples switching partners with an older couple.
This reminds me of the type or porn that breaks a mold. It's one I've talked about before. They are adding a voyeur into the scene as one watches. My favorite DVD series of the last 20 years was "The Watcher" by Vivid. This site touches on that fetish.
A bonus is all of the older people are not unattractive. Some of the women look similar to women you would see on Anilos.
Still, it needs more updates. The reason I'm not a porn site owner is I would put this high on my priority list and have a minimum of 4 updates per month.
The numbers aren't impressive with only 35 videos and unless my counting is wrong, 34 photo sets. The quality of the videos is excellent. Every video has 4K and the site has only been updating since November 2018.
It seems their initial plan was to have it be older/younger women as the first 3 scenes they updated with were just females. After those, they started adding older and younger men. All of the non-bonus scenes have more than 2 people in them. With the most being 5 people.
It's a site with a lot of potential in my eyes. But not everyone sees things the way I do. I think playing to the voyeur watching (viewer) by putting a voyeur in the scene give the viewer a feeling of she or he is doing the same thing I'm doing.
The site also comes with a streaming network of over 14,000 videos. It's not of much use to me but I thought I should mention it. This one falls under the quality/quantity amount of value heading. I downloaded 35 videos I'm likely to keep all of. That is more than I can say for a lot of sites with 10,000 scenes and I do think it's because of the fetish. For years, porn has tried threesomes with all 3 people involved directly in the sex for the entire scene. That formula is stale for me. This site gives me something I haven't seen done on a regular basis since the early 2000s. I would like to go higher on the score. I could always use the old there's 35 scenes, that would equal 7 DVDs so it's still a good value thought.
I think it is and you should check the previews out if you're curious.
LetsDoeIt as a whole can be joined through Porn Users discount for $14.95 a month (not $25) and the Porn Users link also has a 3 month option for $39.95 (not $60). Since you're newer to the site I thought I would throw that tip out there to you.
Question could add a little more to it. Like if it has a download upgrade available. I say this because I once joined MoFos and paid $17.95 for the membership (not knowing it was streaming only) and then paid $15 more to get downloads. I was mostly satisfied with it.
I once joined Asian Sex Diary for $40 with no downloads and no download upgrade. I was not close to satisfied.
It also matters if the site has photos and if you can download those . Look up In the Crack's tiered pricing and you'll see one of the differences between the first 3 plans and the $34.95 plan is the first 3 don't have photo downloads.
On the third con, "No option to download". Are you sure about that? I have been a member here multiple times and they have downloads available for their videos. They are known to have a download limit after you've downloaded so much in a day but that would be a major con if they've removed the download feature. When I click on a preview scene there it says, "Login or Join to Download High-Res Versions"
Having just signed up for this network a few weeks ago, the pimp.xxx was a pre-checked cross sale, nearly every paysite has those and they are a pain in the ass but not a scam. It's a common practice you have to watch out for. Send them an email or call them if they didn't refund you, you should have access to the sites for a month.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
