I really didn't even finish my comment up there. I was nearing the character limit and just stopped.
I'll add this since you being a member probably don't know about this part. There's no preview. I even tried altering the url to land on a preview or home page but it just redirects me back to a page telling Lelu's story. It has an 11 minute video of her masturbating and a blank area to trade your email address for her e-book. The next page is the join page.
My interest in Lelu's content came from seeing her "cameltoe sliding" videos on a tube site. The videos were only 2 minutes or less. It's not a "good" fetish for me. It's one of the ones that takes me into a darker fetish area. It would be a long story. Teasing with 2 minute samples doesn't answer the question about those scenes. My triggered fetish with cameltoe sliding is the woman becoming so wet/aroused, there is believable "accidental" penetration. I thought a preview of the archives would show at least how many cameltoe slide videos she has.
It added up to an 11 minute masturbation video and free ebook to sell me on a $100 site. It doesn't look like she is too focused on bringing in new members. Which made me wonder if she uses the price raises (4 from what I've seen since early 2017) to keep her loyal grandfathered members around since they know if they cancel and have to rejoin it will be much higher.
As much as I agree with the part about the two person operation, there are also huge advantages to that. No booking of models, no paying other models and no drama. It's not as well known now but Eve Angel's original solo site was ran, filmed by her boyfriend. She said she would film 15-20 scenes (videos/photos) over a week period. And they automated the update system to release the newest update each day at a set time.
It also doesn't help that it says under the highest priced membership "Only THREE spots left!" Before this I only knew of her from your review. I have trouble believing she's going to cut off the incoming $199 memberships after 3 more people join it. I'm sure she has some content I would be interested in but I can't see paying over $40 for it. I do understand your side of it, too. I stuck around on Eve's site for months like a lost puppy dog waiting on a new update.
I saw a couple of Lelu's sample videos earlier and thought I would join her site. I haven't been having the best of luck with joining sites for the first time recently but Lelu might be going further than any site.
Regular membership is $90
VIP is $99
Platinum is $199
Those are monthly prices, I've seen the site listed for $29.95 on the TBP page and $37 on Rabbit's. The VIP offers you a $10 discount each month you stay as a member down until it's "only" $49.95 a month.
As bad as this is it gets worse. The regular membership doesn't include downloads of any kind. You have to get the VIP for downloads. It says this about downloads ... "VIP Bonus: Download My Videos regular members have to earn and unlock download ability using the free Hearts reward system, but active recurring VIP and Platinum members, simply request it and it's yours"
The 3 benefits you get from joining Platinum are: 10 minute video chats with her members. Her personal cellphone number and she sends you one new picture in text per day. This one takes the steak and cake, "Choose your own username".
The majority of the perks with VIP and Platinum look very similar to what you get from joining the fan clubs of Chaturbate models. Access to her snapchat, she will follow YOU on Twitter and...
Email 1 on 1 with her. I don't know if its sadness or madness or arrogance, it says "Yes, the real me, no I'm not rich enough or famous enough to have my "people" email for me like some people seem to think lol"
She goes on to say about the one on one emails, "Many people join just for this. Where else can you talk to a woman about sex or ask questions or dating advice or chat about anything else for less than one dinner date per month?"
At McDonalds is where ... for a Big Mac and fries with an iced tea for 8 bucks.
It's real, in this area the lowest speed is 200M, we also have 400M and 1GB (it's more like 940M when using). I got it in their Spectrumtacular deal. I did have to switch my mobile service to their mobile service but it is through Verizon and that's who I already had. You can check here to see if it's available out there.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Harriet Sugarcookie, one of the cutest, most playful and most believable Asian amateur models.
- She has a British accent and she's Asian!
- Mostly amateur content and you will believe that.
- Harriet or someone's personality shows on the site. They have blogs, news, video games, not safe for work sections, a magazine layout of their favorite recent articles and so on. It looks like everything but a porn site.
- Right at 50 models including Harriet, only a handful of pros like Aletta Ocean and Tiffany Doll.
- It's going in pros but 342 total scenes made me wonder.
- Bills through Epoch or Paypal, your choice
Cons:
- Every review I have read of this site talks about the downloadable videos. Those are gone. I paid $5 more than the regular price thinking it was for the downloadable versions but it's not.
- Every review talks about the photo sets. There are no photo sets anymore.
- The only option is to stream in a clunky 720p player that has to buffer every 30 seconds even though I'm on a 1GB connection.
- The December 2017 review on TBP lists 337+ scenes, there are 342 as of 4/20/2019, that's recycling.
- Used to have 2 updates per week, now it has 2 updates per month and it's recycled content.
- While the blog and magazine has some interesting articles you could find most of those with basic google searches.
- I wasted $20. Notice the amount I paid is different than the two prices TBP lists, so something strange is going on with Sugarcookie. I joined through TBP too.
- The hardcore scenes are not very good.
Bottom Line:
Harriet Sugarcookie is one of those rare combinations of sexy but geeky. I would guess Harriet Sugarcookie is not her real name but then again I don't remember the last time I heard an Asian person talking with a British accent.
I thought I had found the porn world's best kept secret when I found this site. I could be wrong on the "mostly" amateur models. I only recognize a few and I was wrong when I thought I had found one of the porn world's best kept secrets.
What you get here is a site that looks like anything other than a porn site. I had to go through a whole process just to figure out how to join it. The tabs include "Magazine", "News", "Trending", "More" and "Porn". Magazine is a collection of articles like "The 10 Sexiest Girls on Game of Thrones" and the news is articles like, "Where to buy sex shop clothes that aren't trashy". The articles are mostly interesting if for no other reason, something different to read and think about. These are authored by the same person and they update every few days.
Oh yeah, I joined a porn site. I was feeling good about the numbers considering it's an amateur site.
There are 214 hardcore videos
64 solo videos
64 lesbian videos
That is 342 total videos. The 2017 TBP review and facts update lists 337+. It also was updating 2 times a week in 2017. Which means there should be at least 500 videos by now. I understand that these solo sites can be hit or miss and the models and owners of the sites often have disagreements but someone is still updating the site like it is updating. There are 2 new updates in April 2019 and 9 in 2019. That tells me there is some recycling.
Rabbit's Review site shows member's area pages where there was a download button below each video and social media bar, now the download button is gone and there's a second social media bar.
This is type of site I normally wouldn't even review but because I was being curious again and found nothing but 2017 reviews talking about how good this site is, I thought I should review it and warn others.
All the reviews I've seen also talk about 100+ photo sets. I haven't found 1 photo set. The closest I've found to photo sets are in the magazine "girls" section and each entry focuses on an Instagram girl. I don't see those as sets since they are random pictures.
The really bad part is Harriet is a great amateur model. The streaming videos show very realistic sex which means the hardcore is as boring as watching your neighbors have sex but the solo and girl/girl content is very good. You definitely won't feel like the girl/girl content is scripted. It's very playful and cutesy to start and then they get downright dirty.
I'm guessing I'm late to the party. The oldest content is 2014, so it is not a newer site.
You can see by some of the titles that the content would be interesting to most porn fans:
Harriet's first ever anal toys
Harriet's first ever dual penetration with toys
Harriet's first time getting off with the showerhead.
Harriet's first on camera blowjob.
It's the very type of content solo fans look for. Everything is kind of screwed up from the recycling, so I really can't tell what is newer and what is older other than Harriet's own changes in how she looks.
It also takes away from whatever the blogs and news added since I don't know if those are just recycled too.
The most confusing part, I joined through TBP and it shows a $15 streaming price and a 2nd price at $25. I have to think that's the download version price and it's what I joined except they only charged me $20.
Hopefully, others will see my review before spending their money on it. That streaming player is the worst I've seen and there are comments on nearly every video that are complaining about it. It buffers about every 20-30 seconds.
They do have a porn deals section with reviews of the sites they are offering discounts on and nearly half are rated lower than 4 out of 5 stars.
My thinking is Harriet is the writer and she is using her real name. She talks about in the Babes Network review how she wishes she could model for Babes.
Breaking down the negatives comes up with a bad problem.
-20 no downloads
-20 no photos, or downloads of photos
-20 for recycling
-20 for the streaming video player being terrible
-20 for whatever the hell happened to the price
-17 for 5 updates since 2017
For a total of -17
I'm going to give it a cute and playful +69 for the Harriet content for a final score of 52.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large network of mostly teen sites.
- By my count there are 33 sites included.
- Pretty good update schedule, certainly could be better considering the number of sites. They average 3 updates per 4 days, across the network.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max).
- Nice, clean network hub which is something I think I took points off for in 2011.
- No cluttering ads, there are 3 at the bottom of the pages.
- Mostly really cute and pretty models but there's not a big variety from model to model.
- Excellent navigation and even says 24/7 support.
- Because of the nature of the content (teens, younger, slimmer) you won't see a lot of implants.
- Some of my favorite models on the network have double digit amounts of content.
- It does a good job of covering the majority of porn niches.
- Very good technical quality throughout from video quality to photo quality.
Cons:
- It's always a good thing when I have to nitpick cons. Several of their sites are very similar and could be merged like Nubile Girls HD and 18 First Sex and Beauty Angels and Teen Sex Mania and X-Angels. If they merged everything there would be 10-12 sites instead of 33.
- The "categories" don't always work. Which is why they should merge sites into one.
Bottom Line:
I once gave this site a lower than average score. I hadn't developed a taste for the humor of reading poor subtitles while watching porn. I remember the site being clunky back in 2011.
The good news is the corny subtitles are still there and now they're quite funny and they've turned the site into a streamlined, well-oiled machine, kind of.
You can tell most of the models (male and female) are not that experienced in porn. I watched a scene where the guy was so focused on the model's boobs he didn't notice her take her panties off and he reaches for them about 7 times before he realizes they are on the floor. It's like the first time I met a woman wearing a front snap bra!
I'm not as excited about the content. It's good and the models are very attractive if you like slim models. I do like what they've done with the site. It's like when I figured out what a front snap bra is!
There's a need for a little laugh at the dialogue from the subtitles. I just picked a random scene for this.
The female is a cute, probably 19 year old and she's sitting at a table in her house. She calls her I assume boyfriend. The dialogue is:
Her: Hello? It is me. Where are you? At work? I see. I'm waiting for you at home. I miss you. Ok. Please come faster. I'm waiting.
27 seconds pass and the guy walks in! Was he working on the front porch? Slide a "20 minutes later..." in there. He comes in and she tells him she will give him a massage. He lays face down, she straddles his butt and takes her shirt off!
Okay, okay, I'm giving them a hard time. Before she ever really massages him she's completely nude. Throw me a curveball ever once in awhile, have the guy say, "What the hell? I thought I was getting a massage? Why are you naked?"
I didn't list it in the cons but it is probably the most legitimate con of the site. If you don't like the corniness you might have a problem with the corniness.
Combining the sites that are similar wouldn't hurt but it wouldn't make a big positive either. The better navigation has fixed most of the old problems.
Their navigation is so good, I'm going to trust their numbers they list.
They have 1,383 models, 5,085 videos, almost 900,000 photos and they are all downloadable.
That's 9 of 33 sites still updating. The problem with this is the 9 that are updating also there's 4-5 others that fit into this group, could be used to put new updates in. First BGG and Tricky Masseur have a theme with them, the others are the same type of sites. Some of those listed as updating only have 2 updates in 2019 and this is the 4th month. Likewise, those 4-5 others might have a new update next month but haven't had one over the last month or two.
I wished the whole "network" gimmick would just go away. It's a website with about 20 niches/themes and each one is being called a different site(s).
Having said that, for barely legal looking teens they have you covered.
Let me throw this in, if you like 4K videos they have a lot here. Going back into 2016 even and they have VR scenes on the TMWVRnet site. I don't use either of those but they're there. The 1080p scenes are available from 2013 forward.
The photos they have are upwards of 3500 long end and for the ones into the VR and other video formats, they have some videos at 60 frames per second, Binaural sound, 3D and 180 degrees. If you're a VR person you will know more about those than I do.
I have to compare it on some level to a site like Nubiles Porn or even some of the 21 Sextury content and it compares well. If you're looking for something that is different and not too formulaic, this isn't going to be the best site for you.
It's one of those sites where you really can't find much wrong with it unless you don't like the content that well. I've obviously found some humor in the scenes and I do like the high technical quality but it's still lacking some personality and it still feels like the models are too similar. At least for my tastes.
I would even wonder how much of this content falls into the heartcore genre and that usually doesn't go over well with me.
I'm not going to punish the site for that. They've done everything they need to do with the quality, the pretty models, the multiple high quality video options and the much improved navigation and site design. This is a higher score than I gave it the two previous times. I believe I gave an 80 and then an 84, so an 88 is credit to their improvements. The content will be more up to your tastes. I could see it being polarizing.
Jimmy, I'm not looking to argue or to continue any problems. I am curious why you never answered my question about the 400 miles award for submitting an "article". I even asked in my review "I'm wondering if I get those points for my review?" There is a concern you are influencing the reviews your members leave here and anywhere on the internet BUT
I was in Cebu City for 2 weeks in December. If you all are looking for legitimate articles about other people's experience in Asia, I would assume especially non-Asians. I was going to submit 20 entries from my own blog to you. That's 1/2 the reason I asked if the reward is for reviews. I knew my review wasn't going to be accepted. My girlfriend is from Cebu City. I met her family for 2 weeks including her 26 female cousins. I was shocked by their sensuality and how (As John talks about) much they "like" men. I thought the content (my entries) might be something you all would be interested in. Especially if I received 400 points for each one. Whether you despise me or not, I think you can at least tell I am an above average writer. I'm going to Bangkok over summer to meet the other side of my girlfriend's family. See why I showed a leaning towards the Filipina and Thai models on Trike and Tuk-Tuk?
What gets lost in a review like mine is something I have said only maybe once or twice in 12 years as a reviewer. I wouldn't care if you have downloads if I didn't like the content. I think you came in ready to defend and brawl and didn't look at the big picture.
And remember, I asked that question in my review before any of this happened between us. By the time, I got back to Porn Users, after posting my review everything had already blown up again. Twelve or so replies before I read any of them. You can see that by the times on the comments. I tried in my previous reply to show a more friendly side by saying maybe I or we could help. I used the word "humility" strongly. It's far from an insult.
I will say your reply on my comment, where I replied with "those insults might hurt you but don't me" or something like that, contained you saying I was being "persecuted" by a webmaster and I think that's how you felt here.
People get defensive and unreasonable in that situation. We are all people and we all have had those moments. It isn't a situation where there is no chance for a bigger picture to exist.
I also posted the comment about your message on your website because it was as much protecting all of us as anything. I knew it broke multiple rules here.
Last, I'm very serious about the entries, it's very interesting stuff. My girlfriend also writes entries about her experience in America. She has only been here for 3.5 years. No need for any of us to push the panic button when a reasonable conversation could have made this all avoidable.
Jimmy, I'm not looking to argue or to continue any problems. You had your moment in the spotlight two too many times here. I am curious why you never answered my question about the 400 miles award for submitting an "article". I even asked in my review "I'm wondering if I get those points for my review?" There is a concern you are influencing the reviews your members leave here and anywhere on the internet BUT
I was in Cebu City for 2 weeks in December. If you all are looking for legitimate articles about other people's experience in Asia, I would assume especially non-Asians. I was going to submit 20 entries from my own blog to you. That's 1/2 the reason I asked if the reward is for reviews. I knew my review wasn't going to be accepted. My girlfriend is from Cebu City. I met her family for 2 weeks including her 26 female cousins. I was shocked by their sensuality and how (As John talks about) much they "like" men. I thought the content (my entries) might be something you all would be interested in. Especially if I received 400 points for each one. Whether you despise me or not, I think you can at least tell I am an above average writer. I'm going to Bangkok over summer to meet the other side of my girlfriend's family. See why I showed a leaning towards the Filipina and Thai models on Trike and Tuk-Tuk?
What gets lost in a review like mine is something I have said only maybe once or twice in 12 years as a reviewer. I wouldn't care if you have downloads if I didn't like the content. I think you came in ready to defend and brawl and chose not to look at the big picture.
And remember, I asked that question in my review before any of this happened between us. By the time, I got back to Porn Users, after posting my review everything had already blown up again. You can see that by the times on the comments. I tried in my previous reply to show a more friendly side by saying maybe I or we could help. I used the word "humility" strongly. It's far from an insult.
I will say your reply on my comment, where I replied with "those insults might hurt you but don't me" or something like that, contained you saying I was being "persecuted" by a webmaster and I think that's how you felt here.
People get defensive and unreasonable in that situation. We are all people and we all have had those moments. It isn't a situation where there is no chance for a bigger picture to exist.
Last, I'm very serious about the entries, it's very interesting stuff. My girlfriend also writes entries about her experience in America. She has only been here for 3.5 years. No need for any of us to push the panic button when a reasonable conversation could have made this all avoidable.
It was you that once led me to Trike Patrol, several years ago, I think. I wish Jimmy would tone down the dramatics and work with us instead of trying to get an attitude with everyone and trying to start some kind of rebellion on his site against us.
It's kind of sad that he believes the average porn consumer is going to side with him after they see how he talks to everyone here. I had said before I posted the review I was going to give it a 65 but while reviewing it, I noticed the Flight Club and still think it looks very questionable. You know the worst part? As of right now, two of his members have sent emails saying they like him but agree about his business decisions being bad. It's like he didn't consider the negative consequences of asking his members to come here.
Thanks for the compliments and support, Shen. This is roughly round 712 with a webmaster. Maybe Jimmy will realize none of us are really against him. We have kind of "adopted" a few webmasters in the past and helped them out.
You're right about your navigation. It is terrible. If I could ever be of any use to you for advice (I won't charge), I would be willing to help you out with figuring out how to reprogram it, make it more user-friendly, post on here or on the Porn Users forum and ask. Believe it or not Jimmy, we do not get any joy from "bashing" a site. Humility is the key. Porn Users could be your best friends. I will give you that about conquests number but if you look back at my comment, I based my number just on your estimation of 2.5 hardcore scenes per week. You know why? I didn't know which were just the sex scenes and which weren't. What then comes up is how many of those are just part 1, part 2, part 3 and so on? I know one of the newer conquests has 5 parts in it. Does that count as 5 or 1?
On the ads, I can't use ADblock or something like no script. I have work chats, some are flash, some are java. I already use 3 browsers so I'm not disabling one of them just to be able to visit a porn site. The main ones I have a problem with are the moving ones. I'm not worried about clicking on them. I will say I almost missed the flight club because I saw the box for it and saw it was blue in color in the upper taskbar. I thought it required a different membership but I did go into it. I can see your point with it but why make users have to earn the right to download a scene? Imagine the way you would be looked at if you said, "You know what, members? You can download all 70 of those right now for no miles." I've been around porn since 2003. I'm not saying that to show my knowledge over yours. I'm saying I've seen many webmasters just like you, that are now working for Mind Geek.
I like that you all have exclusive content. I would rather join a site like yours than a mainstream, cookie-cutter site but you have to be willing to work with what some of your consumers want or you alienate them. I gave your site +35 for the models and believable sex. That's as big of an addition as nearly two of the biggest deductions combined.
Last, you mentioned to I believe Shen or Jook that you all are protecting the models. Why doesn't Trike Patrol? Porn is illegal in the Philippines. I just don't believe your explanation on that. Porn is frowned upon in nearly every country in the world.
To show you what happens when you bring negative attention to someone else, one of your members has already contacted me. Not defending you but telling me, "Jimmy is being a douchebag. Ask him how many of the Conquests are from Date Slam!" I didn't know what Date Slam was but I see it is another of your sites. You sharing "exclusive" content between your sites? Don't turn yourself into Julius Caesar, Jimmy. There's a Brutus around every corner.
Advice to survive in the porn world, when you fall in a hole, jump out. Don't stand there and dig yourself deeper into it.
You're right about your navigation. It is terrible. If I could ever be of any use to you for advice (I won't charge), I would be willing to help you out with figuring out how to reprogram it, make it more user-friendly, post on here or on the Porn Users forum and ask. Believe it or not Jimmy, we do not get any joy from "bashing" a site. Humility is the key. Porn Users could be your best friends. I will give you that about conquests number but if you look back at my comment, I based my number just on your estimation of 2.5 hardcore scenes per week. You know why? I didn't know which were just the sex scenes and which weren't. What then comes up is how many of those are just part 1, part 2, part 3 and so on? I know one of the newer conquests has 5 parts in it. Does that count as 5 or 1?
On the ads, I can't use ADblock or something like no script. I have work chats, some are flash, some are java. I already use 3 browsers so I'm not disabling one of them just to be able to visit a porn site. The main ones I have a problem with are the moving ones. I'm not worried about clicking on them. I will say I almost missed the flight club because I saw the box for it and saw it was blue in color in the upper taskbar. I thought it required a different membership but I did go into it. I can see your point with it but why make users have to earn the right to download a scene? Imagine the way you would be looked at if you said, "You know what, members? You can download all 70 of those right now for no miles." I've been around porn since 2003. I'm not saying that to show my knowledge over yours. I'm saying I've seen many webmasters just like you, that are now working for Mind Geek.
I like that you all have exclusive content. I would rather join a site like yours than a mainstream, cookie-cutter site but you have to be willing to work with what some of your consumers want or you alienate them. I gave your site +35 for the models and believable sex. That's as big of an addition as nearly two of the biggest deductions combined.
Last, you mentioned to I believe Shen or Jook that you all are protecting the models. Why doesn't Trike Patrol? Porn is illegal in the Philippines. I just don't believe your explanation on that. Porn is frowned upon in nearly every country in the world.
To show you what happens when you bring negative attention to someone else, one of your members has already contacted me. Not defending you but telling me, "Jimmy is being a douchebag. Ask him how many of the Conquests are from Date Slam!" I didn't know what Date Slam was but I see it is another of your sites. You sharing "exclusive" content between your sites? Don't turn yourself into Julius Caesar, Jimmy. There's a Brutus around every corner.
Advice to survive in the porn world, when you fall in a hole, jump out. Don't stand there and dig yourself deeper into it.
This might take two replies. If there's one thing I have a problem with everyday, even in real life, it is people that try to impose their self-worth and intellect on others. When I corrected your spelling of laughingstock it wasn't to be grammar nazi. It was to show you brought pettiness into our productive conversation with the insult of "laughing stock". I, in turn, corrected it with pettiness. Logical flow is the single-biggest reason our society fails at conversations. You nearly broke the logical flow with an insult. If you had not said "laughing stock", I couldn't have corrected it. Go ahead and say I did something wrong there. It's like blaming someone for stabbing you after you shot them.
I do appreciate your attempted civility in the explanation of industry/non-industry. You will be able to explain why I scored Girls Out West, one of the least industry sites, one with 100% amateur models, a 97 just two months ago, right? I said "attempted civility" because of this "you are pre-conditioned". Hi Jimmy, meet me, a PhD in Psychology and Philosophy. Pre-conditioned is what you do to leather or a cast iron skillet. The word you're looking for is predisposed. See how nice I am to you? You will be able to look like you really are talking over people's heads now. Back to talking eye to eye on a human level. I graded your site in comparison to Girls Out West not in comparison to Reality Kings of Brazzers. Girls Out West has over 4,000 videos, over 2,000 photo sets. They are all downloadable. The videos are 720p to 1080p and the photos are up to 6000 long end. They update everyday with a full video and their price is $29.95. The advantage your site has is I much prefer your models. I would love to love your site. That's what you are not willing to understand. My biggest problem with your site is in your business philosophy (no downloads, high price, low quality photos, annoying ads). Those are things you can fix. Those are things your members at ASD might very well turn on you over once it's pointed out to them like you did by inviting them here.
Another attempt at pettiness with "The 90s called big pictures and video downloads". Jimmy, in the 90s, most of us were on dial-up, we weren't downloading big pictures and definitely not videos. I remember having DSL in 2003, I believe. Cable in 2005. You're using a diversionary tactic to avoid the reality of 90% of all porn sites, industry/non-industry, allow downloads and aim for the highest quality pictures and videos. It's your choice to give your consumers what you want. It's their choice to criticize you for it and not come back. I would rather your site excels and blows Mind Geek out of the water than to see it fail but you won't believe that because you only seem to listen to you.
(Continued in next reply)
Just making a note here for PU members and staff. Sometime, earlier today, I was at work and saw that Jimmy has put a feedback request up on his site.
"Perplexing review by user on pornusers - Agree/disagree? Come voice your support for Asian Sex Diary!"
It links to my review. I know the Porn Users rules under "content standards". I know he is breaking multiple rules. He singled me out in the link and directed his members to voice their support for him.
I'm posting this at 10:55 PM on 4/2/2019. It can be used to see how many sudden Jimmy supporters we have show up.
I will continue my productive conversation with Jimmy in the review comments.
Last, this should be used to see who is "stirring the pot".
I just want to add a few facts. Facts cannot be argued.
The trophies/model list is 7 models wide by 12 tall. That is 84 models per page, 7 full pages = 588. There are 12 on page 8. So 600.
I compared Trike to ASD based on value. Your numbers above, which I appreciate, says 2.5 hardcore scenes per week so 130 per year, 6 years x 130 is 780. Your numbers also say Trike has 500 plus. I can download 0 from ASD for $40. I can download 500 plus from Trike for $30. We have to stay on the same page to make this work.
I won't defend myself for removing points for non-Asian pornstars being on an amateur Asian site. That sounds like an "industry", "non-industry" dilemma.
And could you explain what you consider industry and non-industry? I have no motives with the one question in this. I am just curious.
Go easy on the insults, Jimmy. Laughingstock is one word.
I almost held off on posting it but I doubt I will go back to the site. I kept running out of characters or I would have explained the Flight Club offer better. I kept having to remove a sentence here and there.
Here is the offer:
"Written Info Article: +400 miles for a well-written article on any particular subject related to hot Asians and porn lifestyle. (min: 4 paragraphs)"
I also noticed two "reviews" by Chevy14 on Freeones which explains why he said he was updating his review here. It's copy and pasted on Freeones. His first review is on Rabbit's Reviews in the comments too. He must have got confused and pasted the 2nd one here.
The newest review very much goes into the porn lifestyle, he talks about John setting out to creampie as many local Asians, more creampies for European Porn Stars and even African women. He also talks about all the countries John visits.
I think the worst part was I originally had it lowered to 10. My main thinking if the webmaster replies to it is he can tell me anything inaccurate in it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- An Amateur Asian porn site. That is relatively rare these days.
- Over 500 models (see cons).
- I like their sites Trike Patrol and Tuk-Tuk Patrol. Those also feature John Tron who is on ASD as well.
- Some of the Asian models are very attractive.
- Kind of updates "daily", an example of kind of, the March 30th update is a 30 second video of John Tron talking and standing in an airport terminal, I guess. The screenshot that I clicked on showed a very pretty Asian woman in tight jean shorts but she's not in the video.
Cons:
Cons will be explained in the bottom line:
- The navigation is very bad. You have three search options: alphabetical, country and date of release.
- The value is very low. $40 for no downloads, not even the photos.
- The photo quality is 1600 long end at best. That was barely acceptable in 2007.
- The blogs, the master guides, have not updated since 2015.
- Non-Asian models. It's an Amateur Asian site! I can see American and European amateurs all over the internet.
- The price. It's the only website on the internet that is $40 with no downloads.
- The ads. Seriously? 12 ads in the right margin and 3 are moving? For a $40 a month website?
- The Flight Club, a rewards system, definitely see Bottom Line.
- The camerawork in doggystyle.
- Some of John's own comments to members make you wonder how "unique" he is.
- Their own sites Trike Patrol and Tuk-Tuk Patrol have nearly as much "sex" content with downloads and are cheaper.
- A lot of cleaning up needs to be done on the site.
Bottom Line:
I considered saving this for my 350th review. I have both welcome emails to verify I am a full, paying member on the site. Seemed too easy to just jump in and pummel the site. The truth is I wanted to like this site. I once read something by John Tron about his frustration with Americanized women and I could relate. I have read other things by him about his love of Asian women.
I expected this site to have problems with me. The no downloads is a problem since I am a collector but would someone really try to sell a site for $40 a month, no downloads and not deliver with a very unique experience? I took that risk. They set the precedent with the price and no downloads.
The content reminds me a little of Amateur Allure. It's formulaic. Some of the models are really pretty. There is an indifferent part for me but could be a positive or negative to others. Most scenes end in a creampie. I'm indifferent to both the creampie and facial. I do want to note before the creampie, some of the videos skip a little. Looks to be edited. It isn't my connection. I'm on gig internet.
The streaming videos look good if you go full-screen. If you don't go full-screen you will have at least one moving ad and five more ads beside the video player. There are also 6 moving ads below the video player.
I watched several of the non-sex videos, a few funny moments, but nothing special. The photos look like they could be good until you click one and see it's lost in 2007. They are 1200 to 1600 long end depending on the orientation of the photo. You also can't download the photos.
In a comparison, I watched 2 of their "sample" videos on free porn hub, a tube site, they allow the content to be there. I only had to see 2 ads beside the video player on free porn hub. The videos are shorter (9-12 minutes) on porn hub but it's because they edited out most of the bouncy camera parts.
Each doggystyle section is similar to mounting a camera on a mountain bike and riding it down the mountain. They also use a fixed camera for doggystyle. This gives you the unique experience of only seeing the woman's side boob, side butt and John's side gut.
The blogs haven't updated since 2015. The product reviews by John haven't updated but once in the last year and one of the newest reviews is an external hard drive. Something you won't need on this site.
One of John's replies to a member that asked if he was going to bring the model back ... "asking every day. Her husband seems to be the problem". The site's tagline is, "Conquering Asia: One slanted pussy at a time."
Member reviews have long been based on "value" meaning price/what you keep from the site. That is $40/0. Look at that, I found the unique part about the site! It's the only site on the internet charging $40 for what is equal to a glorified tube site, except it has more ads than a tube site.
I started the review saying the site set the precedent. It is what happens when you insist on playing by different rules than other competitors. I'm not talking about mainstream porn, either. I'm talking about Trike Patrol and Tuk-Tuk Patrol. They have downloads and are $10 cheaper.
I believe ASD jacked their price up to get people like me to think "they must be doing something really special on this site to charge $40 for no downloads." I would have been much happier with a month of Trike Patrol.
I'll end with the Flight Club. They reward you points for things like being a member (+100), for logging in (+10) which pays them for all those ad views, commenting (+10) probably reloads the ads. You can "buy" scenes for 600 to 2000 points. Oh and for writing "informative articles" about Hot Asians and Porn (+400). I'm wondering if I get those points for my review? I noticed at least one "member" (the 99) review here has the same review all over the internet. A note on the price, the 2013 TBP reviews said the price was $29.95. How many sites have increased their price from 2013 to 2019? Upon canceling, Vendo offered me a "please stay" discount of $19.95 a month.
I used the same scale I have used for 12 years and on 349 reviews to write this review. I rarely list all deductions or additions since there usually aren't this many. I will not argue or debate with their webmaster but he is welcome to comment. Here are the additions and subtractions.
-20 for no video downloads.
-20 for the price shifting/overall value.
-10 for the non-Asian models.
-10 for poor photo quality and no photo downloads.
-10 for the ads, the not updated blogs.
-10 for a rewards system that awards members for shilling the site and clears their points as soon as they cancel, even if they still have membership left.
That's 100-80 = 20
+35 for the pretty amateur Asian models and the non-doggystyle believable sex.
+3 because I don't like odd numbers.
Of note: I have taken -20 for poor photos and no photo downloads before. I knew I couldn't add enough points to make up enough to get it to 50 points.
100-80+38 = 58.
Back in 2010 or so, 21 Sextury brought us the continuing account feature. Hard to believe, it was originally used as a selling point to collectors. If your membership ran out, you could still sign into the members area and see if your favorite models had any new content, unlike most sites where you had to join to see inside the member area.
Back then, if you remember, we didn't have thousands of porn promos. Nowadays, if you go to use a promo with your previous login credentials on a site, it recognizes you as a past member and asks you to login. When you login, the promo is gone and you are offered a "reactivate" price, usually $10 - $15 higher than the promo.
Back in 2010 or so, 21 Sextury brought us the continuing account feature. Hard to believe, it was originally used as a selling point to collectors. If your membership ran out, you could still sign into the members area and see if your favorite models had any new content, unlike most sites where you had to join to see inside the member area.
Back then, if you remember, we didn't have thousands of porn promos. Nowadays, if you go to use a promo with your previous login credentials on a site, it recognizes you as a past member and asks you to login. When you login, the promo is gone and you are offered a "reactivate" price, usually $10 - $15 higher than the promo.
I had very little luck with using the Roku to watch porn. The best, if I remember right, was Videobox and even it was clunky. I don't know for sure but at one time, Videobox had a 6 month or 12 month discounted membership with a free Roku, so they were definitely invested in it at one time. I think that was 4-5 years ago.
The saddest part about your responses is it shows how shallow webmasters can be. You look at the score and it dictates whether you are happy or not. You don't realize that 99 from two weeks ago hurts your site. No one believes a site with 4 pros and 3 cons is a 99.
It's sad because you are downplaying the incredibly thorough review mbaya gave your site. It shows you as being a little self-centered. You don't think other people will look beyond the score since you don't? Maybe some people aren't bothered by no downloads and could add some points back for the 20 point deduction. He posted an explanation for every deduction and addition. He could have buried your site but instead he gave it a 70 and left it open for others to decide what matters to them and what doesn't.
He did it for free on his own time. And your response is to come here and belittle him and his review? I know you advertise Rabbit's 89 review of your site and say you are the highest rated Asian site but you know what? When I saw "no downloads" Rabbit's 89 dropped to a 69, in my eyes. See why the number doesn't matter as much as you think?
This sums up the confusion better than anything. I looked back and found my welcome email to Lewood. The title of the email is, "Your Login Info to LeWood.com". The first line inside the email is "Thank you for joining EvilAngelNetwork!"
I still think Gamma is seriously pushing their luck with all of this. It is almost identical to when 21 Sextury started their network push in 2009-2010.
The bad part for me is I have a year membership to Fantasy Massage network it has Adult Time with it. I do not have Evil Angel or LeWood with that Adult Time access. I really think they should have stuck to waiting until they were ready to offer a set amount of sites and made it clear what you were getting. I have now paid for 3 sites that I have had access to from various Adult Time accesses: Burning Angel $17.95, LeWood $14.95, Evil Angel $9.95.
This sums up the confusion better than anything. I looked back and found my welcome email to Lewood. The title of the email is, "Your Login Info to LeWood.com". The first line inside the email is "Thank you for joining EvilAngelNetwork!"
I still think Gamma is seriously pushing their luck with all of this. It is almost identical to when 21 Sextury started their network push in 2009-2010.
The bad part for me is I have a year membership to Fantasy Massage network it has Adult Time with it. I do not have Evil Angel or LeWood with that Adult Time access. I really think they should have stuck to waiting until they were ready to offer a set amount of sites and made it clear what you were getting. I have now paid for 3 sites that I have had access to from various Adult Time accesses: Burning Angel $17.95, LeWood $14.95, Evil Angel $9.95.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The site of pornstars Mark Wood and Francesca Le ... but wait it's also a network that is a network in the Evil Angel network.
- If you like hardcore porn this is the place for you.
- Massive collection of porn.
- There are 25 websites in the network including possibly the most disgusting website ever created, Milk Enema.
- Very high quality technically and in production values. You would think people this perverted wouldn't care about production values but they do.
- Download speeds are the fastest I have had, it's about 90% of my max.
- Some legendary producers are here including Buttman John Stagliano.
- Navigation is pretty good once you figure out what you're doing.
Cons:
- Enough with the confusing crap. It says Evil Angel Network once I signed in, so is this just an Evil Angel clone? It also does not come with Adult Time and this is a Gamma Entertainment site. Look at it this way: LeWood is a 24-25 website network and it is on the Evil Angel Network which I had never heard of and through my Evil Angel account, I have access to Adult Time. Do one network. Not three. Not two. One.
- There is some very hardcore content on here. I am not against it but it should be mentioned in cons.
Bottom Line:
I can't seem to get out of this cycle of Gamma sites. This is one time I think having the ability to post a picture or screenshot would help with this review. My tab at the top of the screen says, "Evil Angel Network" not LeWood. In another tab, I have Evil Angel open.
This is where I am going to get frustrated. As an Evil Angel Member, I can search in "directors" for LeWood. Here are a couple names of the most recent LeWood scenes on Evil Angel:
Emily Willis: The Anal Awakening scene 4, scene 3, scene 2 and scene 1.
On LeWood's website the most recent scenes are:
Emily Willis: The Anal Awakening scene 3, 2 and 1. There are also 5 other LeWood scenes in-between those. So, part of the newest content on LeWood could be gotten from Evil Angel. Even worse, Evil Angel already has parts 1-4 of Emily Willis: The Anal Awakening while LeWood, the director of the scenes only has 1-3 on their website.
To me, that hurts both LeWood and Evil Angel. Evil Angel's biggest selling point for years was the exclusivity of their content. There's no way I can sit here and go through each of the LeWood sites and see just how many them are near clones of content on Evil Angel.
It kind of feels like LeWood is a spinoff of Evil Angel at a higher price. Even more odd that I have Adult Time access with Evil Angel but not with LeWood.
The good thing is I am a fan of a lot of Evil Angel content. I like their quality, the depth of their content and their production values.
By my count there are around 8,000 scenes. The content dates all the way back to 2000.
The videos started with 1080p around 2009 and every video since has up to 1080p quality with 6 lower options. They cover the quality very well. They also have a pictures category and I honestly can't tell you what the photos are related to.
As example, the video update on 3-14-2019 is of those devilish Ortega twins and on 3-15-2019, the late bloomer Vicki Chase. The 3-14-2019 photo set is of Luana Navarro, a transsexual model. It says it's from Luana Navarro Set 2. These seem to be legit photo sets and not screencaps but it doesn't match the video releases. All of the videos have a "related pictures" link that is usually to 6-10 photos. These specific "photo sets" have over 200 photos in them and are downloadable.
It makes you wonder if these sites have a tester that goes through the site as a member to see how the experience is.
A big selling point here is my girlfriend likes transsexuals but she only likes solo transsexuals. One of the transsexual sites on this network is called She Plays with Her Cock. I was showing my girlfriend the site and every scene is a transsexual with a man. Why would you name a site "she plays with her cock" and then have the model having hardcore sex? It would be like a site being named "She plays with her pussy" then you open it and she's having sex in every scene.
Confusion seems to be the theme here. It's definitely not bad. It could use some changes. The site works very good just like every Gamma site does.
If you're curious about Milk Enema, they squirt milk into the model's ass and she squirts it back out into other people's mouths. Don't take that as me being nasty. Take it as me saying I'm telling you what is so the curiosity won't lead you to watch a scene! Tori Black, one of my all-time favorite models, has a scene on it and her scene isn't that bad. Some of them are very graphic. It is an older site that hasn't updated but maybe 3 times in the last 4 years but you've been warned.
Most hardcore doesn't bother me at all. I grew up watching Buttman scenes. Those old Buttman DVDs are still very good, similar to an old Vivid DVD.
My main complaint is how much of this content is already on Evil Angel? I probably won't join again because I believe the majority of what I would want is on Evil Angel. I don't mean to say that as a way to hurt their business. I just don't like joining two sites that have the same content on them.
There is nothing in the members area to make me think LeWood is a separate website or network. The url for LeWood's homepage is members (dot) evilangelnetwork (dotcom) en (slash) videos (slash) lewood. It's a subdomain of Evil Angel Network.
These sites are getting carried away with all this need for networks and confusing prices. Of note, Evil Angel, Adult Time and LeWood all go up to $29.95 in the second month.
Definitely not my most coherent review but the content I'm reviewing isn't very clear. I'm giving it an 86 because it's good, hardcore porn, in very high quality.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
