Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the frontrunners for the best new(er) networks challenging the big name networks like Reality Kings and Brazzers.
- 43 sites by my current 3/11/2019 count with a placard in place for "Dirty Cosplay" coming soon.
- Already has a large number of scenes with nearly 3,000.
- Updates every other day, usually would expect more from a network but their production values are very high for a network.
- There is a good balance of niches.
- This is an odd one but it can viewed in 6 languages.
- They even have photo sets and zips, though you will miss them if not paying attention.
- Download speed is 80% of max, I have seen it drop a few times but not for more than 20-30 minutes.
- You're sure to learn a new language or two.
Cons:
- The update schedule is okay for a high production value network but there are a lot of sites that are not updating.
- Website can be serious pain in the ass to deal with, will explain in BL.
- Navigation and layout could be streamlined. I sometimes feel like I'm qualifying for the mouse-clicking contest.
- Biller is Segpay, if you're new to them they are not bad but can be frustrating.
Bottom Line:
The first time I joined this network it was barely a network. I didn't even know it was called the PornDoe network back then. Some of their kinkier sites had got my attention. Now, they are the Let's Doe It network. I would call it "Worldwide Doeing It Festival". You can even add "of Arts" at the end of that.
The biggest con for me is the site itself. I forgot my password. I tried to reset it, I had to answer a captcha to even start recovering my password, then a captcha to submit my email address to recover. Once the change password link was sent to me, I clicked the link in it and had to answer another captcha, I typed in a new password and you guessed it, had to enter another captcha.
I missed 4 separate times! The real frustration then showed up. After changing my password and being sent to a login screen, I logged in, the "busy" spinning symbol showed up on the screen and a message flashed "Cannot connect to captcha" and I couldn't sign in. I was this close to posting my first ever 50 review. Porn sites are so quick to get you through the sign-up registration process because they know that is when they are going to get you to miss unchecking a cross-sale but once you're a member they make you jump through hoops for 20 minutes just to get signed in.
I took 10 points off for that. It's better than 50 points off.
The content here isn't that much different than the content you will find on Reality Kings, Brazzers, Bang Bros but there is just enough difference to make it a good network to join a time or two per year. The problem I am already running into is a lot of the sites that interested me to begin with are no longer updating. Their navigation does not help in figuring out which sites are updating and which aren't.
If this is wrong blame the navigation. By my scanning through newest updates these are the only sites that have updated this since February 1st, 2019: Horny Hostel, Her Limit, Scam Angels, A Girl Knows and The White Boxxx.
That is 5 of 43 sites updating. There also are scenes missing from some of the sites. Chicas Locos and Public Bondage were the two sites I originally knew of from this network two years ago. About half of the Public Bondage scenes are gone and Chicas Locas is missing a few scenes too.
Those that have been members of Bang Bros, Brazzers, know the frustration with the ever-changing sites within the networks. I don't know if they decide a certain type of scene is no longer working or if they're trying to predict what the next big thing in porn will be but it definitely hurts the returning member possibility.
One thing I have noticed are the sites that are updating are almost all United States/Canadian. They have content that is German, Latina, Italian, French, Portuguese and US/Canada. One German site is still updating, the other 4 are US/Canada. It's true, the US and Canada have a blend of all those types of models but this goes back to the navigation. Why have all those listed when only two are updating?
That's probably my way of saying it needs to be less cluttered.
The models include very well-known pornstars but there are lesser-known models here too. I don't know if that will continue if they are focusing on US and Canadian models. My favorite model on the site hasn't changed, Apolonia Lapiedra. I do not think she is a well-known model.
The model list is usable but the two options they give you to filter the models with are "Hotness factor" and "Recent activity".
If everything was easier to use, if the navigation and clutter were cleaned up, this network would be up there with the very best networks on the internet. As it is, it's a good alternative for when you get bored with the top networks.
The quality is good throughout the network. They do not have dates on their older content so I don't know how old some of this content is but everything I have downloaded from here has up to 1080p video and every scene I have looked at has downloadable photo sets.
The sites that are no longer updating are still good sites for new members. It kind of feels like they probably recorded a lot of content before launching as a network. Once they were launched they decided not to record more of the same niche content and just stuck them on here to add some varied content. It's better than nothing. Bang Bros did it for years with success.
I will wrap up with the con about Segpay. I have never had any problems with Segpay but it is because I realized you can sign in on the Segpay site and cancel your membership(s). Most sites with Segpay have a support option and want you to submit a ticket. If you go to Segpay's website you can enter your card number and email, it will let you cancel from there plus it will send you a cancellation confirmation email.
The needed improvements might be too much to ask but the content is still very good.
The edit time limit caused me not to be able to edit.
The old workaround still works, I just tried it. Sign up like regular. When you enter your information make sure to miss the CVV Code and the expiration date. It will say your bank rejected the purchase and ask if you want to use a secondary biller. It is currently Epoch or Paypal through Epoch. That makes it a lot easier to fix if you run into problems.
Canceling is still tricky but their customer service told me it is just bad programming. If you go into your account within the members area you will see what Bang Bros packages you are registered for. If you just joined Bang Bros with no add-ons, it will be the only one listed but if you joined any add-ons those will be listed too. You have to cancel each one. They have a button on each to cancel so it's not too difficult. This was supposed to be a way for a member to retain their access to say an add-on package without having to pay for the main site and any other add-on packages.
I don't have any problems with them but I do use a prepaid card. Their customer service will respond at times. They are the ones that told me to use a prepaid card. You can get the cards online for a $5 fee from giftcards(dot com). If you find a promo under $10, the added $5 isn't too bad and unlike some sites, their billing processes prepaid cards. There are some sites that reject prepaid cards, especially those using CCBill.
You can also use any prepaid/gift Visa/Mastercards you have. I only know about those from having a credit card that rewards members with points that can be traded in for a "Debit" card. I pick up about $100 a year in rewards on it and use that for sites that are questionable in their billing practices.
Thanks Loki, I have always liked the ATK sites, they were one of the first sites (Galleria) I remember joining, along with Karups PC. I did not realize how frustrating it was going to be bouncing from site to site. I wanted to bang my head on the monitor. I'm sure I missed content too.
Also can understand and agree about the natural and hairy site. On that part, I don't mind the pubic hair, I prefer it over clean shaven. I just don't care for the hairy underarms and legs. Even ATK Exotics has some models with the very hairy underarms. I can't say I have ever known a woman in real life that has hairy underarms or legs.
And from now on, I will go back to joining one ATK site at a time. That is just too much content.
Normally, I wouldn't join a site or network for $50. There's another that I keep almost joining, Killer Gram, it's a British site, they keep going up on their price. I think it was $39 last time I checked and Abby Winters is the other, also nearing $40 a month but because I was going to join ATK Exotics and ATK Petites, I didn't see the one-time join of the network as too much for one month. I definitely feel different about that now. I hope we're not heading towards high quality, unique sites jacking their prices up. Just checked and Killer Gram is down to $24.99 a month. I'm glad I mentioned that or I would have forgotten to check it.
I find the hair part unusual. I think everyone knows my favorite model is Eve Angel. She was never fully shaven and always had some hair.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network that is going to be very hard to review as a whole, massive network of young, teen, hairy, shaven and some just beautiful models.
- You get access to ATK Galleria, Premium, Exotics, Natural and Hairy, Petites and Archive. If you like them all you better set aside some time.
- I try to join sites through PU's links but I had a promo for ATK Network for $49. That's my max that I would pay for a site/network.
- This will be explained further, I am counting 10+ updates per day across the network.
- Download speeds are very good (between 80-90% of max)
- Navigation is not terrible, if you have been an ATK member before it will make the navigation better for you.
- ATK's photos are the focus for me. Their videos are okay to good but the photos are better.
- They have most mainstream niches covered on the network.
- Signup through CCBill
- Could be a lot better with some fixes. Even 15 or more points better!
Cons:
- I don't mean to offend anyone that likes hairy models but that hairy site is a waste for me.
- No access to Aunt Judy's or ATK Girlfriends. Maybe Aunt Judy's is understandable but why no ATK Girlfriends?
- Patience is a good thing. Time is too. You're going to need both to bounce back and forth between websites.
- The regular price $99.95 is way too much, $49.95 is better but I don't know that I will join again at that promo price either. I would say $34.95.
Bottom Line:
Maybe the most frustrating review I have posted ever. There's no way I was going to join ATK's network for $79 or $99. I had a promo they sent me about 6 months ago for $49. Since I hadn't joined Exotics, Premium, Petites or Galleria in nearly a year, I decided it would be worth joining the network to catch up on the content I've missed.
I considered Archives to be a site I wouldn't need to check since I have a lot of the older ATK content. I knew I wouldn't be downloading anything from Natural & Hairy. The first thing you will notice about the network is it's not a network. You are buying a membership to the six sites. You have to sign in on each. ATK is a massive site/network. Some of these sites have been around for as long as I've been buying internet porn.
I decided to look for a specific Eve Angel scene from ATK Premium. I first opened the "movies" tab. It shows Premium only having movies back to 2014. The Eve scene I was looking for was probably 2009. I clicked on the models list and there's Eve (Eva on here). There are 16 pages of her content. No dates. Two videos, two photosets per page. That's a lot of clicking. I bounced around from site to site having to sign in on each. I thought I would check Archives out, it says the current content in the archive is from 2001-2006. Then it shows newest updates in the Archive as 2019.
Stop it. This is not funny. This is a regularly priced $99 per month network!
I can fix it. Put all the content on one site. Call it Amateur Teen Kingdom! If you find a model you like, this is what you will have to do to find all of her content:
Find her on Galleria, download her content, login to Petites, find her in the model list, download her content, login to Archives, find her in the model list, download her content, login to Exotics, find her in the model list, download her content, login to Premium,find her in the model list, download her content. Yes, I know that's repetitive and redundant but when you do that for 10 models, you start to feel repetitive and redundant.
Put it all on one site and go with a $34.95 price. This reminds me very much of when the "All Only" network launched years ago with 5-6 premium sites in it for $34.95.
The content is good but trying to dig through 6 sites in 30 days? I would rather join one and have 30 days to go through it.
I don't think I realized that until halfway through my membership. I have downloaded all the Exotics content that I wanted/has been added since my last membership. I will be lucky to finish another site before the membership expires.
The ATK sites offer something rather unique these days. It's a professionally filmed amateur site. No, they're not all amateurs but when you see the models you will think it's from their amateur days. There's little to no glam here. Makeup is at a minimum. Premium, to the best of my knowledge, is the only site that offers "no implants". These sets will make your most favorite glamorous porn star look like the cute girl that just moved in next door to you. It's a major selling point. Their photos are much better than their videos. Premium has some good videos but overall, the ATK photos stand out.
The amount of updates is impressive. I'm just estimating at 10+ per day, across the network. Exotics alone has 3 to 4 updates per day as does Petites. And I get the part about Archives "updating" as they add old content but where is that old content? Is it being removed from the regular sites? If so, it shouldn't be an "update".
The video resolution on the newer scenes goes up to 4K. Photos are very good quality and downloadable.
I looked around for content from Fred the Photographer but don't see any new content filmed by him. He was always one of my favorites.
This is another thought about improving not just the ATK sites but any site that specializes in photos. Has there ever been a thought about combining all of a model's photosets into 1 zip? There are models on here with dozens of photosets at 10 - 50 MB. It takes 1 second to download those sets.
The frustration comes from knowing I would have been happier and it wouldn't have cost much more to join each site on a monthly membership. As it looks right now, I might get two of the sites caught up on my downloading. Those sites could have been joined for $17.95 each.
My preferred order of the ATK sites: Petites, Exotics, Premium, Galleria, Archive, Natural and Hairy.
Still don't get why Girlfriends isn't included as this is the ATK network and it's an ATK site. Seems like a missed opportunity to get ATK fans hooked on another site.
My score is leaving major room for improvement. Petites and Exotics could easily score 90 on their own. Maybe I will review one of those as a standalone and show how my frustration goes away when away from the six site package.
I would recommend any of the ATK sites if you're into the niche they cover. I just can't recommend this high-priced package of sites.
I had to check your join date since there is a chance you didn't know this part. Back before 2011, a member could get a raffle ticket by placing 5 user trust votes per week. If they had badges they would also get a ticket for each of those. Some members were getting 11 tickets per week just for posting 5 user trust votes. It caused a lot of randomness. Back then, it never felt like those were being handed out for any other reason other than raffle tickets. There would be members with 0 reviews that had 20+ trust votes. It was one of the negatives in the old raffle system. It was built to create a community and interaction between members. A person could also get tickets for 5 replies. That too led to a lot of silly randomness like replies to a review that said, "Love this site!" I thought it was interesting that I checked your trust votes since you only have 5. I noticed your first one was from an anonymous member. I logged in and saw the "edit your vote" button. Meaning anonymous was me. It now shows my vote as your newest. I guess where I added a comment to it.
Sometimes the teen models just look too young for my taste. The ones in their 20s usually have gained a little weight and filled out more. My favorite models are usually in the 24-35 range but there are exceptions both ways. A trend that I admit I don't like and this is in regular life too. The women that are coloring their hair gray/silver. I see it a lot around the colleges in this area. I saw one the other day that had her hair full-on silver. She was walking in front of us and I thought, "Man, that old woman has a nice body." She turned around and looked to be about 20.
I have tried to go back and change any of my anonymous "yes" votes to show my name. I used those back in the early days of PU because I would notice if I gave someone a yes vote they would give me one. I didn't want members "trusting" me just because I gave them a yes vote.
As for no votes, I haven't to my knowledge, given a "no" anonymous vote.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the internet's largest sites and highest quality sites.
- No longer is just about teasing or non-pink or non-sexual poses, the site continues to become a little more risky each time I join and it's a very welcome change.
- Not only will you find at least a dozen or more models you really like, you most-likely won't see half of them thanks to size of the site.
- Download speeds are very good (80% of max).
- The models are all very attractive, very much teens and they're becoming more playful.
- The quality is close to as second to none as you can get, that's technical quality.
- The pictures can be so big that they're bigger than life-size. I opened one and all I could see was the model's belly button and a couple freckles. That's virtual reality to me.
- For a site this size the navigation is very good.
- The videos are nice technical quality and some are good, not great but the real draw here are the pictures.
Cons:
- So, about those videos, it's not meant as disrespect at all or even demeaning to the models but most of these models are so young that they're just not seductive in the videos. It reminds me of watching a woman do naked yoga. Some might like that but some won't.
- Similar to the other sites on Met-Art's network, there are cam girls over on the right of your screen.
- This is a new one that I hadn't seen before, "staff selection" videos. Looks interesting, started playing one ... it's a 30 second sample. If I want it ... pay $4 for 1 video. I don't like it. I know, I can skip it but when you're posting videos of non-masturbation then post one of masturbation and tell me I have to pay to watch/download it, I don't like it.
Bottom Line:
I've been trying to review sites that aren't reviewed as much but my subscription to Met-Art is running out in a few days and I wanted to review it.
For years, Met-Art frustrated me. I like pictures as much as videos. They're taking really good steps to improving the photo sets. More models are starting sets in clothes and teasing, that's a big improvement to me since used to it was "she's naked" in picture 1 and by the end of the set she's still naked and not showing anything. Now, you're going to see most everything including the fun teases, upskirts, upshorts, panties slid over. I'm glad to see them adding more sexuality to their site. I used to kind of "poke at them" for their models doing the "what is over on that hill over yonder" poses. Now, they're doing, "I'm bending over, what do you see?"
I listed in the cons and I really don't like the "staff selections" videos that feature masturbation, which very few if any of the regular membership videos show. At that asking price, two videos would cost almost as much as I pay for a monthly membership to Met-Art. I've been borderline on complained about Met-Art X having masturbation while Met-Art doesn't but I think Met-Art at this point has earned the right to stick to no masturbation videos on Met-Art ... which is why I don't like the staff selection videos. It makes me feel like they could just combine Met-Art and Met-Art X if they're going to charge extra for masturbation.
Met-Art's strength has always been photo sets so I didn't really punish them in the score for the video problems.
You get 4 new photo sets per day, which is more than anyone that I know of. And they have a very good variety of settings. I know someone asked recently on another review of another site about photo orientation. Met-Art has a good blend of both portrait and landscape orientation in their photos. The overall numbers would normally be more than I would try to include in a review but I'm going to try it in this one.
Here goes nothing...
18,886 photo sets
812 videos
And yes, those numbers could be wrong! I would say even if they're not exact, they're fairly close. Just estimating, that's around 1,500,000 and 2,000,000 photos. When you add in that high technical quality, it's all but impossible to complain about Met-Art.
I'm going back to the beginning because I have been very impressed with their style of shooting in the newer photo sets. We've got upskirts, upshorts and the lost art of skin-tight shirt with nipples sticking out. I don't want to say they've been influenced by anyone but a lot of these newer sets are very similar to the sets on Zishy, which to me is the best tease photography site on the internet.
The navigation features updates tab, films, photos, model list, blog and they all work! It let's you focus more on what your preference is and with a site this big that's a must. Maybe even ALS Scan has influenced them a little on the photos, I just thought about that and threw that in.
They also are adding a better blend of models, they're almost all slim/slender but a few are more built and you're starting to see more Hispanic, Asian models. That to me is where Met-Art is at their best. You're capturing very young models, so the teasing and hints at shyness is important to it. This also plays into the large photos. If it's an upskirt and you open one of the large photos, you can see everything you've ever wanted to see through the models' panties. The combination of adding more tease and big photos offsets the video problem for me.
You of course can download the photo sets in zips and some of them are as big as some videos you've downloaded. These newer photo sets are nearing 8000 long end. We have joked before about the huge pictures sometimes showing imperfections but in this case, with all this teasing, I don't mind being able to count the pubic hairs she missed while shaving.
Similar to Zishy, I just can't go all the way to a 100 with Met-Art because porn is photos and videos. I will say that if they improved their videos it wouldn't really change how I view Met-Art, as a photo site. So, maybe it's best that they don't try to become a solo masturbation video site. I don't even know that I would download the videos. I have a Met-Art folder that has over 300GB in it and it's all photos. It's going to be a long time before anyone threatens their dominance of the photo porn world.
I would recommend it to anyone but I like to think everyone likes some photos. If you're dead-set on videos, I can't say you'll be happy with these videos. I do want to mention someone asked a few months ago about sites that have videos of fully nude models lightly touching themselves but not full masturbation. Met-Art fits that description well.
Like some of my other recent, highly-rated, well-known sites, I probably won't review Met-Art again unless there's major changes. It's near perfect as it is.
A few things to note when reading a TBP review:
Under "dates" on the top right of the review you will see "date listed", "facts updated (with date)".
The last time the facts were updated was 5-16-2018 on Babes Network.
It's one of the dilemmas with reading reviews. As you can see, the date the facts were updated was right around the time you're seeing problems with their updating. With the amount of sites that are reviewed and updated there will always be a chance of running into the problem you're running into. Sites change how they update, sometimes overnight, without telling anyone.
If you will look in the Porn Users reviews on the Babes Network, you'll see that there are newer reviews than TBP has. It's one of the strengths of Porn Users, owned by TBP, members post reviews with newer information than TBP has.
If you'll notice, the newest Babes Network review by a Porn User was on 12-18-18, and that member only scored the network a 70.
This is coming from a member of PU, not a staff member. Porn Users often times has the newest information on a site. You should consider writing a review (on Porn Users) on Babes Network it will at least help someone avoid the problems you had. And trust me, we've all been there and I think it's how most of us ended up here on Porn Users.
I had wondered if the X would throw anyone off since for example, FTV has FTV X and that's male/female hardcore sex.
Met-Art's "hardcore" site is Sex Art. It's not going to make you think of Evil Angel or Burning Angel but it does a good job of presenting the beautiful Met-Art models in hardcore sex.
Met-Art X is more like DDF's One By Day site used to be and how 21 Sextury's Club Sandy and Pix and Video were.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Call it Met-Art goes to the produce section, or Met-Art with working anatomy or Met-Art gets the finger, it's Met-Art solo, maybe the X is misleading to some.
- Met-Art models masturbating, that alone is 2-3 pros.
- The same Met-Art quality we've come to expect, numbers will be in the bottom line.
- Very good download speeds, just over 80% of my max download speed.
- Navigation is good, easy to use and from what I can tell is accurate.
- Photos, as expected, are still a strong focus even with the masturbation videos and are downloadable.
- Something I haven't said too much in recent reviews, it's not likely you'll find a model that's unattractive.
Cons:
- It's hard to list cons on Met-Art because they are always trying, always improving something, but the sign-up page nearly got me on a cross-sale because the programming was off and had it crumpled up in the middle of my screen (right where you type your username in registration). Remove the cross-sale and that can't be a problem.
- Ads from cam models, I think they're free for Met-Art members but I'm afraid the majority of us have been tricked way too many times by those on OTHER sites, not Met-Art ones and got charged for clicking on them. Either way, everything would look cleaner without them or with them at the bottom of the pages.
Bottom Line:
For years, I've joined Met-Art and thought, "All it needs is a little more personality." Then, they brought out Sex Art and I thought, "Okay, not that much personality! Those new personalities have dicks." Then, I joined Met-Art X and said, "This is what I've been looking for!" I don't like to say any model or models are too pretty or too innocent for hardcore sex but it's how Sex Art makes me feel at times. No offense is meant, nor am I dropping a competitor's name for any other reason than to say the Sex Art content reminds me a lot of Nubiles.net's content which my review of it shows I complained about the models not looking comfortable in hardcore sets.
But Met-Art X is more personal, I've always joked about the solo genre needing to be a collection of short stories, like a girl and her finger, a girl and her 11 inch cucumber. It's to my surprise, better than I expected but it's hard for this type of site to be perfect. As one of the biggest solo fans on PU, even I eventually get bored with solo porn. I do think in the case of Met-Art X it's more about the models becoming comfortable with masturbating for the camera. I've said it before, I can watch 1-2 minutes of a solo video and tell you if I'm going to like it. The model's body language, her expressions and her sounds, words, moans.
I've never found a model that mastered the solo scene like Eve Angel did, especially later in her career but there are some here that have a lot of potential.
For sake of giving credit where it's due, one model on here has me looking for more, Elena Koshka. Her scene "Indulge" is one of the most erotic masturbation scenes I've seen and her eye contact with the camera is ... Eve Angel-level. One of the most genuine aspects you see with these younger models is when their eye-contact breaks from the camera, not because they're shy but because they hit the right spot and close their eyes.
There are others but I think hers stand out as my current favorites on the site.
The site isn't huge like Met-Art but it's growing. There is one update per day and it alternates from video to photo set each day, for a month you'll get around 15 videos, 15 photo sets.
The video quality does vary but only on the 4K option. I don't know if there's a pattern but the videos with 4K option aren't that common, maybe 2 per month. I tried making the jump to 4K back on Black Friday but ended up returning the monitor/television and going back to 1080p, so the 4K isn't a selling point for me either way. All of the videos have 1080p option, as well as 720p, 360p and 270p options. The videos are crisp and clear with excellent sound, something they've taken from their sister site Sex Art.
The photo sets are some of the best you will find and they also do something I'm partial to, some of the sets even start with the model fully clothed. The photos are downloadable in high, medium and low qualities. The newest high quality photos are 4200 long end and there is a mixture of portrait and landscape photos in each set. The photo sets are also a good size in amount of photos with most having 100+ photos in them.
As of 2/3/2019: There are 211 models. There are 631 videos and 438 photo sets. See how nice good navigation is? I didn't have to estimate on any of those.
For me, this is a near perfect site just because even when I get bored with solo porn, I always come back to it. There's also a nice blend of model types, though I would like to see a few more "exotic" looking models. The blend is in body types. You're not going to find any models here that fit in a 40 inch ass category or huge boobs category but some of the models are definitely curvier than others, which isn't real common on the artsier sites. The curvier ones look like they were or are athletic young women with fit builds, instead of slender.
The masturbation isn't ever too extreme or even rough, a lot of it looks like genuine 1-2 fingers masturbation. There are some fruits and vegetables and toys in some scenes but I prefer the finger ones.
The numbers also tell us that most of the models have more than one video or one photo set. I'm going to have to join Met-Art (been awhile) to see how many of these models have sets on it that are tamer and that in and of itself, will make these Met-Art X scenes even better to me.
There's not much to change. I would have every scene start with the clothed model but there are exceptions. One of my favorite photo sets on the site is Barbara Vie "Just Like 90s" with her slinky top and panties on in the shower. So, she's not fully dressed but the clothes make it even better even if they're only on for 5-6 photos.
It's a site I like a lot and probably would score it even higher but this was my very first join of it. I have to give it some room to move up and continue to impress me. Recommended for those that like or love solo models.
I had been a member 2-3 times before but never had access to All Fine Girls, so I was happy to see it included. I think something must have changed at Wow since the price was also a few dollars lower than listed on PU. I enjoy their content as much as I do any of the teen sites.
The Spectrum part has been a huge deal in this area. Brighthouse, our electric company, partially owned and funded by the state, was approved to offer cable, internet and home phone services to all of its electricity customers. The negative backlash against it involves low-income families that receive reduced electricity bills being able to get near free cable and internet. I personally am not bothered by that. I think if those of us that can afford it can help those who can't afford it, have it and have a little enjoyment/entertainment in their life, I'm all for it.
It still pushed Spectrum to make changes to compete. No one even knew we have Spectrum Gig in this area. It's their first move to compete with Brighthouse. Throughout my life, I have had a provider that eventually became Spectrum (Time Warner and Charter) so they're suddenly wanting to talk about something you talk about, brand loyalty.
There was one catch to my new offer ... I had to switch my mobile service to Spectrum. Spectrum Mobile is on Verizon and that's who I have anyway, we have 5 lines. Spectrum dropped my price on mobile from $238 a month to $125. They upgraded our cable to the gold package with 3 DVRs for $89 a month and upgraded the internet to Spectrum Gig for $79 a month with a new 3.1 modem. I also let them leave the home phone on it for $19 a month which activated a bundle promo of $50 off per month for having 4 services with them.
My Verizon and Spectrum bills in December were a combined $418, this month with all the services on one bill, it's $274. They're also back to doing the no-contract ... contract, where the customer can cancel at anytime without fees but they have to guarantee your price for 12, 24 or 36 months.
I'm finally getting full speed with the Spectrum Gig. It must have taken the modem some time to fully register my connection.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very good site that includes access to two other sites, doing my best not to call it a network.
- This is one of those sites that the models are the big selling point, very attractive, cute, pretty ... mostly thin and young looking models.
- The price was even cheaper than the TBP price shows, it was $19.95 when I signed up.
- Updates daily, is easy to navigate and would go as far as saying it's one of the best navigating sites.
- I'd almost add this my newest criteria for a site to have to be reviewed, it has photo sets and they're downloadable.
- Download speeds are above average, about 75% of my top speed but will mention this more in BL since it's possible I'm being capped by my cable company.
Cons:
- Considering how young most of the models look, you're sure to walk away feeling like a dirty old man/woman. Maybe that's a pro?
- Two pre-checked cross-sales.
- Not for sure I would want much story since I wouldn't be able to understand them but there's not much story.
Bottom Line:
I put off joining this site for several years. I didn't feel I was old enough to fully enjoy it, much like Teen Mega World. I guess that's me saying I'm now old enough to enjoy it.
The sites you receive are: Wow Girls, Wow Porn and All Fine Girls. Starting out with some numbers:
Over 600 models
Over 4,000 videos
Over 5,000 photo sets
The quality is very high here. Close to 700 of the videos are 4K. Their oldest videos are available in 720p, so there's very little low quality content.
The navigation stands out for being a little different than what most sites use. Since they have three sites, you can select to just look at content or from all 3 or 2. From there they have the basic tabs along the top that will take you directly to the videos, updates, galleries (photos), and model list.
They also have a tag system that seems to be fairly accurate. There are a few that make you wonder if you're looking at a porn site or a theater list like "Acoustic Intimacy". Either way, acoustic intimacy does not sound like porn.
They also have the videos that are shot in 60 frames per second.
Overall, the three sites give you a good blend of solo, lesbian, hardcore, threesomes and foursomes. Not to anyone's surprise, my favorite scenes are the solo ones. These models are a little different than your normal solo models since they can't communicate with their words and if they do, you can't understand them.
The sex can be hit or miss and I also think that's common with a site like this one. The guys almost always seem excited while the women do seem either shy or very horny. That's where the solo content stands out. Most of these women seem to love masturbating for the camera.
I should mention this before I forget it. My download speed estimation could be off a little. I was upgraded in internet speed again to Spectrum Gig. But the highest download speed I've seen was 450 Mbps, the Gig is supposed to be near 1000 Mbps. I've noticed it's not as high on other sites either so I'm most-likely being capped.
The models are some of the best I've seen, in the teen category. You even get scenes that are believable to the different models. Besides liking the solo ones, I also like the ones that are playful lesbian scenes. What man or woman even doesn't think about walking by the bedroom door and seeing two 18 year old young women kissing, fingering and well, just naked?
I think that should be added to this site's genre/niche, how about we call it, "For your voyeuristic pleasure"?
Which is why the pictures are such a big deal. The one thing I've always preferred with pictures is they let your imagination work. Sometimes when watching a video, I want to tell the model to stop moving around, pictures solves that problem unless you look at them too fast.
I have noticed they also play to the younger look of the models with some of the outfits like silky socks with a puff of lace at the top of them. I'll be okay with it as long as they don't bring out the lollipops and pigtails.
I should have mentioned that Vendo was the biller for me, they're trustworthy. The Paypal signup doesn't allow Visa cards.
I'm sure I could complain about some of the action being dull but maybe that's the point of the young models?
I would put these sites just a little below Nubiles but they're still one of the top 5 in pretty models, young model, type sites.
I would recommend it to anyone who hasn't been a member before or at least in a while.
Adult Time added Burning Angel to their list of sites, so I added 5 points back to the Burning Angel review. More changes too ...
I now sign-in through Adult Time's homepage. Which is okay with me since they have Burning Angel listed in their sites now. I'm only pointing this out because it seems odd:
When I reviewed Burning Angel, less than a week ago, the site said it had 937 videos on it, it now says it has 823 and in dracken's review from 3 months ago, the number was near 1,500.
I don't notice scenes missing since I mostly focus on specific models but since it's listed right there on the front page of the site, I can't help but notice the disappearing scenes.
I don't know if this is a new feature but Adult Time's main page uses captchas, the ones with 9 photos and you have to click on the ones with whatever it asks for. I was resetting my password, had to click on the pictures with "storefronts" in them. I passed it, they sent a link to reset my password. After typing in the new password and clicking submit, I had to then click on the pictures with traffic lights in them.
I'm still pulling for Adult Time to continue to keep improving, maybe some captchas that ask "Click on the photos with pussies in them"?
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A nice change of pace site that also gave me access to Adult Time.
- I like alternative women, tattoos, and there is a lot of both on here. Would be a con for some.
- You also get a broader range of body types on this site, which is a major plus for me.
- Ran by Gamma, fairly easy sign-up and cancel but both could be easier, see cons.
- There's a good blend of content, you'll see threesomes, MMF, group lesbian and should say most everything is hardcore. There's not a lot of softer content but there's also not any too extreme hardcore either.
- Most of the models are very attractive.
- I would like to list navigation as a pro but the Adult Time hub takes the site over and you have to work with Adult Time's still clunky navigation. That to me is a Pro-Con.
Cons:
- One pre-checked cross-sale and after unchecking it and submitting payment, the same exact offer popped up on my screen. I consider this borderline unethical because the pop-up lands in the middle of your screen and looks very much like the "enter site" screens you see on some sites. Not a huge deal but why would someone join another site when they're given Adult Time?
- I won't say the action is 100% formulaic but most of the scenes do have a similar feel. You kind of get the feeling the "different" style of models is the unique part of this site. And that's okay but should be noted.
- Adult Time might have a negative to it that I just noticed and will go into in the Bottom Line.
Bottom Line:
I've been a member at Burning Angel several times over the last few years. Not surprising to those that know me, I originally joined it to get some exclusive scenes of one of my all-time favorite models, Regan Reese. There are several regular models on here that I do collect too, so a join each year or every 6 months is normal.
The con about Adult Time: I joined Burning Angel for $15, then I see that I have Adult Time which would keep some paying members for more than a month. The price after the promo month is $30 a month. I normally wouldn't notice that but I've been trying to figure out how these sites are just "giving" us access to Adult Time without an extra charge. I also wouldn't have thought about it if not for the pop up mentioned in the cons. As soon as you give me reason to question ethics, I start noticing other things I normally wouldn't have noticed.
I personally like Adult Time but it complicates sites that I collect from. And I have one yearly membership that gives me access to Adult Time, already. I would wonder if they've considered giving you the option to turn off Adult Time access? Especially for those of us that have more than one membership that gives access to it. I'm starting to think about potential problems that I and at least one other PU member had with Met-Art's Network consolidating your logins to their various sites (I lost access for 3 days). I stand by something I said way back in 2007 on a review, porn sites should use the KISS system of Keep It Simple, Stupid. No offense is meant, my dad used to say it to me about everything.
Burning Angel, years ago, was one of those sites that mostly flew under the radar due to the alternative/tattoos look of their models but now that tattoos are more common, you'll see a lot of mainstream porn stars on here too. I'll add a bit of humor, at least for me, I don't think I realized some of these models had tattoos! I have had a huge attraction to Regan Reese, who was one of the first mainstream, heavily-tattooed models, for over 10 years. I've explained that also as having met Regan and would say I consider her a friend now. She was nothing like I expected her to be and to whatever extent, I think that opened my mind more towards the heavily-tattooed models.
The site itself has most everything you could want. The newest videos have up to 4K option, there are multiple video resolutions available from tiny (360p) to 1080p on the majority of the scenes on the site. Joanna Angel is credited as the mind behind the site and she's one of the models I collect from this site. They also have screencap downloads. There are over 400 models, it does include males so probably 300-350 females. There are 937 videos as of today (1/22/2019), according to the site's main page but I'm a little disappointed over the Adult Time access or what I would call "takeover" of the site.
If you accidentally click "videos", you're going to be taken back to the Adult Time videos. If you search in Adult Time for "Burning Angel" it doesn't come up. It's also not listed in the 140 sites section. Luckily, one of the newest updates on Adult Time is a Burning Angel video. I clicked it and was able to click the "Burning Angel" tag on it and get back to just Burning Angel content.
That to me is a major problem. I don't care if it's in Beta. I joined Burning Angel not a Beta of Adult Time. I appreciate Adult Time for what it is, a clunky, massive catalog of porn. I appreciate Burning Angel for what it is, a niche site that almost zero of the other Adult Time sites are like. Not having it in the sites list or being able to even find it in a search within Adult Time is poor business. I've said it before, I'm not a computer programmer but I know it can't be that hard to get all the sites listed within the hub.
So, my feeling is Burning Angel, for those that like alternative/tattooed models, is close to a solid 90 by itself. With Adult Time making me jump through hoops to get back to the Burning Angel content, it's a low to mid-80s site. I'm sure they will get this all fixed eventually and I'll have a more positive view of Adult Time. As of right now, it's burdening sites like Burning Angel. What I mean by that is, I joined for the niche of Burning Angel's models. Not in the mood for regular, mainstream models.
This problem can be best shown by my above part where I clicked on "videos" on Burning Angel's page and it took me to Adult Time's videos. I was able to search within Burning Angel's models but I'm sure there's a model tab somewhere on there that will send me to Adult Time's models and not just the Burning Angel ones.
I would almost say it's the best of tattooed/alternative models but I really don't know of many of other sites that focus on this niche. It's recommended and hopefully they'll do something to improve the integration with Adult Time. It makes me wonder how many other sites Adult Time gives access to but aren't listed.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- At one time, one of the best multi-model, solo girl sites and it's still good, just with some changes.
- Download speed is very good (80-85% my max).
- Probably as much variation as you will ever get in solo porn.
- Other Aziani sites come up as closed when you click the links from within the sites BUT the content is now mixed in with the Aziani site's content.
- A pro and smack on the butt for trying to be different in a copycat industry.
- CCBill is the biller, no cross-sales and no ads unless you count their trusted friends at the bottom of pages.
- Navigation still works very well, they have an excellent tagging system but I said very well and excellent, not perfect.
- My favorite part about Aziani: They get models that you don't see a lot of on other sites. As a Lana Lopez collector, I'm positive Aziani has more content of Lana (10 photo/video sets) than any other site and there are many more of these.
- Huge site (see bottom line).
Cons:
- As good as the navigation is, once they started combining sites onto one, it does make it a bit harder to find content and to know for sure you're seeing all of the model's content.
- Hard to believe but the oldest content on this site dates back to 2002. Updates have slowed to 5 in December, three of those came between December 1st and 25th, two came on the 26th. The older content is poorer quality and the newer content is becoming very slow to show up.
- Rachel Aziani most likely has retired, her last set was 7/4/14.
Bottom Line:
I want to initially focus on the pro about the smack on the butt for trying to be different in a copycat industry. To my knowledge, outside of Sybian-based sites, Aziani was the first to regularly let their models ride the Sybian. These sets, if you've watched them, can be very hit or miss since the Sybian itself obstructs the best views but some of these videos are excellent. If Lana Lopez ever had a negative against her it was that she wasn't always "into" her scenes. A very pretty model that could easily pass as Jessica Alba. Her selling point was just that ... her looks, not even nudity. Her Sybian scene on Aziani is the most expressive I've seen Lana and it shows what us porn users most-likely missed in her career.
They also were the first site I knew of that had specific public nudity, exhibitionism with their site Aziani Exposed, that content is here on Aziani now. They even tried fitness models and even female muscle models. They had a separate site for those called Aziani Iron, that content is now on Aziani. I'm pretty sure TBP still lists them as separate sites but I can confirm the content is on Aziani now. They've tried the massage theme. They originally had 6 bonus solo model sites too. Three of those, when using a link inside Aziani, say they are forbidden but the content from those solo sites is also on Aziani.
One of their biggest strengths for me was the loyalty between them and the models. Most of the models have 10+ photo sets/videos, some have as many as 50. To me, this all brings a slight laugh since the site originally was for Rachel's husband Buzz to photograph and video her masturbating. Her friends then showed up and it never seemed to stop or find a happy medium. That makes it both sad and great to me. Rachel's husband Buzz is another of those photographers that the models seem to love to shoot for.
I'll let some of the numbers speak for themselves:
Roughly 400 models on Aziani with most models having 10+ scenes.
Nearly 3,000 videos and photo sets, each.
Videos go up 1080p, have 720p options, older videos go down in the more standard video sizes.
I used to joke in my reviews of Aziani. Rachel herself had talked about Buzz having a lingerie fetish, which isn't the best thing for those of us that like to see a model fully-dressed. I'm pretty sure I once listed one of the cons, 10 years ago, as "Jealous of Buzz". Most of the sets do start in lingerie.
I do think it's a con that Rachel isn't shooting anymore. If her information online is right, she's 50. I thought she looked attractive in her 2014 sets, maybe not as comfortable as she used to look in her sets but didn't see anything wrong with her look.
Even with the clutter of combining all those sites into one, the navigation still works, especially if you know who you are looking for. The solo sites that originally came with this site are: Dakota Rae Patrick, Amber (Bach) at Home, Priya Anjail Rai, Heather Summers, Mary Carey and Lexxi Tyler. All of their content is now on Aziani.
I was surprised when I signed up and saw a new update from an "Aria". I thought it was going to be Aria Giovanni but it's not, however, this Aria is also very attractive. I think that could be a con for some. The majority of these models are not teens. They also are more aimed at bigger boobs, including implants. These were the types of models that were very popular from the late 90s into the mid-2000s.
And continuing to find the sites that at least have some interest and focus on real photo sets, not screencaps, Aziani's photo sets are real photo sets. There are a lot of positives here. You have Sybian, public exhibitionism, a little different with the muscle models. There's not a lot of male/female sex on here. I do remember Rachel Aziani, the site, having male/female but I haven't found many of those on Aziani. I don't remember those being anything great. I'm pretty sure Buzz preferred the solo models playing with themselves for him and his camera.
If interested, especially if you're a collector, check out the model list. Just doing a quick scan over it, I noticed Lexi Belle, who has 49 scenes on here. I'd also like to know more about this new Aria and if she has other content. She has 8 scenes on Aziani. It's a site that's worth trying for the collector side and finding new models or even forgotten models. I just saw one earlier, Cindy Hope, that used to be one of my favorite models. It's not going to go much higher than a 90 but I do think a 90 is fair considering the huge amount of exclusive content that covers multiple genres/niches.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I once questioned if this site was for me (2008 review of an 81), it's still around and it's now one of my favorites!
- One of the most unique porn sites on the internet.
- I could be wrong since some of these models could be on other sites but I don't know any of the models from anywhere except this site.
- They have a little of everything for everyone, as far as body types, pubic hair, and real amateur models.
- The site works well and loads quickly, important since I assume their servers are in Australia. DL speeds are very good (about 80% of my max).
- Despite the amateur genre, the content is very high quality.
- You won't ever feel like you're watching cookie-cutter porn on this site. Very unique scenes with what looks like real, believable sex.
- While you're not likely to find an Eve Angel here, I have found many favorites through the years and they all look like women I see in everyday life.
- Billing is handled by Epoch.
- No cross-sales
Cons:
- I will stress this one. In 2007 or 2008, whenever I reviewed this site originally, here at PU, I was neck deep in the Eastern European porn boom that seemed to churn out "perfect 10" models weekly. I questioned the quality of the models here at Girls Out West. And it's important to say, I still don't like every model and I would guess most porn users wouldn't like every model.
- This site has a true pro/con, that I'm listing as a con. It's addictive. The models are almost all new to you if you've never been a member and some are so cute or so pretty that you just have to check out their content. I've been a member for 3 months now after only meaning to join for 1 month.
Bottom Line:
It's worth mentioning that I've typed this out six times only to run out of characters before finishing and starting over. That hasn't happened since probably 2016. In short, Girls Out West, has been a fountain of youth for my porn interest. I once heavily criticized this site, 2008 or 2009, with an 81 review here at PU. Which is below average for my scoring. I didn't like that every model wasn't a perfect 10 and didn't like underarm hair on some of the models. I still don't like underarm hair but I just don't pay attention to it like I used to.
It was a different porn world back then. Eastern Europe ruled the porn world, perfect ten models, prissy, feminine models. They also had two of porn's greatest producers Denys DeFrancesco and Viv Thomas filming back then. In 2019, we have a bunch of models that are just like the last model and producers that think porn is 19 minutes and 56 seconds per scene with the same 5 positions highlighted, in order.
Girls Out West changes that. The main focuses of this site are solo models and lesbian scenes, there are male/female scenes but they're not that common in numbers compared to the other two:
Roughly 2,000 solo scenes, roughly 1,500 lesbian scenes, roughly 300-400 male/female scenes. Hopefully, you're adding that up to nearly 4,000 amateur scenes. They also have over 2,000 photo sets that are shot more in the style of Denys DeFrancesco (DDF) than current photographers. Including starting with a fully dressed model that giggles in some pictures, teases, then is fully nude.
There's personality here that you don't find in many sites these days. The more than 2 models, lesbian scenes have the feeling of, "What happened, she was naked and I got horny so I got naked and those two over there got horny and got naked then we all got together."
Besides the huge amount of exclusive content there's also the technical quality with some videos having 4K dating back a couple years, 1080p, 720p dating back more than a decade. That's rare for amateur sites.
I decided to try Girls Out West again when I saw a picture set, on a free TGP site, of a model named Rubi Valentine. She was cute, playful, sexy, exotic, natural. To my surprise, the watermark was Girls Out West. I joined in November 2018 and am still a member, another rarity for me to let a membership recur for 3 months. I can't help it. With that much back archive and daily updates, it seems like I'm just now seeing every model at least once and have downloaded over 100 models content from the site. That's another plus, the majority of the models have more than one video/photo set, some even have over 20. Besides my initial attraction to Rubi Valentine, once a member, I discovered Lulu. An incredibly cute model that has a "kind you don't take home to mother" side to her. Sorry for the Rick James reference. There's Bianca that could easily have been a top 3 model in the Eastern Euro boom of models.
There's also the frustration in myself for overlooking this site for over a decade. This is the closest I've seen to real, believable sex in porn in years. The Australian accents don't hurt, either. Neither does the kinky, frizzy hair that was made popular years ago. That, in and of itself, is exotic these days. Exotic to me is a look. It could be a darker complexion, it could be dark complexion with green eyes, it could be a hairstyle that's uncommon, an attitude or personality that's not phony (sorry Los Angeles) and Girls Out West does those types of models better than any site that I've joined over the last 5 years.
I won't give it a 100 simply because these models are not for everyone. Including me over a decade ago. I also haven't been a member long enough to say the site is a 100. That's probably my fault. I will say it's the first site I've felt constantly drawn to since joining, since the first time I joined Zishy. The blend of models, slim, heavier, darker complexion, pale complexion, freckles, it's all believable, real.
The amount of content: Close to 4,000 videos, 2,000+ photo sets, is unheard of in the amateur world unless it's one of those amateur sites that has a bunch of 18 second clips. There are interview videos that are fun to watch. The accents and personalities really shine in those. It takes me back to a time when porn was fun, models were shooting it for money but also because they loved having sex and losing inhibitions. There are exhibitionist, voyeuristic, scenes here too. I haven't noticed many implants or tattoos but considering these models come off as genuine, I'm not for sure those would bother most viewers.
It's rare that I let a site recur this long with intentions to go at least one more month. Besides the video quality that is hard to find in amateur porn, the newer photos are 6000x4000 resolution! It's even rarer that I feel bad about giving a 97. Give it a try, at least look at the previews. It has become one of my most recommended sites to others.
While not a true "search" where you type in a keyword or tag, if you click on "model directory", it will open the model list. The "tags" are listed above each model: Nu! (public nudity), 1st (first time in porn), etc...
They don't look clickable but they are. If you click any of the tags it will take you to all of the models that have that specific tag, in order from newest to oldest.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- ALS Angels, the bustier, lesser-known, sister of ALS Scan.
- I think it's a very underrated site that many probably don't know exists.
- If you like slick shaven models, this site is for you, ALS stands for All Ladies Shaved.
- These models look older, more physically mature than ALS Scan's models. Though there are exceptions.
- Continues to churn out 2-3 updates per week and the site dates back over 10 years.
- CCBill is the biller
- Download speeds are good (80% of max).
- Like ALS Scan, the videos are very high quality and on top of that, you get very big, great quality photo sets with each scene/set. These are photo sets not screencaps and can range from 300-500 photos.
- Has some unique scenes that bring a helper into a solo scene, some gynecological scenes, some fisting, a little bit of everything in the solo genre.
- Excellent models, a lot of these newer models are models I only know from ALS Angels.
- One of the few sites that I like the BTS videos from.
Cons:
- As each year passes, ALS Angels navigation and layout grows further away from 2010. Come on, guys, do something with the navigation.
- The standards for being on ALS Angels instead of ALS Scan is becoming very blurred. A very recent model is 5'3" 99 pounds with 32B boobs. How does she land on the curvier site? No offense to the model is meant, quite the opposite.
Bottom Line:
I can be a bit grouchy at times and this might be one of those times. I've been a loyal supporter of ALS since 2007, have joined ALS Scan more than a dozen times and the same for ALS Angels. Joining two sites to see all of the ALS models and content is frustrating. Here's an offer of a truce: Fix ALS Angels so it navigates better, make it look like it was updated this decade, and I won't be as grouchy about having to join two sites to see all of ALS models. This is becoming a rather abusive relationship at this point lol. I go on ALS Scan and it has this near perfect navigation, everything is organized, updates more often than ALS Angels then come to Angels and it looks like it's 2009 again.
This wouldn't bother me so much if ALS hadn't shown they can make changes or improvements. They have, even on ALS Angels, there's no nicer feature than they have on their scenes. You don't have to click anything to go to the set, then click a download button. The links are right there beside the set so you can just download them without going through all the clicks other sites make you go through. The same with their excellent photo sets.
I have complained in the past about the model separation. It used to be a bigger deal to me, back when Eve Angel was active and they insisted on Eve being on ALS Angels instead of ALS Scan. I bought the explanation of her having bigger boobs and curves in her hips but these newer models on ALS Angels are tiny. I mentioned 5'3" 99 pounds, 32B on one, there's another that's 5'6" 103 pounds, 32B. Another is 5' 105 with 32B. How do you get smaller than that? If I say much else, it's going to be very offensive and I'd rather not.
Done complaining.
I gave them a 100 and took off 15 for the complaints. These complaints have been here since 2009. Really done complaining.
ALS Angels offers as much or more as any solo models site. They perfected this "helper" niche, where a model/genuine helper, oils the model, is playful with the model, flirts with the model and depending on the helper, might even slip a lick in or a good rub or two. It's unique in solo model porn. It never seems planned, the helper is planned to be there but the actions seem very natural. An example I've probably used before is an older Eve Angel scene. The helper seems completely blown-away with Eve's sexiness. She's oiling Eve's thighs, looks at the cameraman/staff and says, "Does she like girls?" Eve isn't a native English speaker but Eve says, "Yes!" The helper leans over and gives Eve a lick or two. The helper most-likely didn't ask for pay! You could see how excited she was to get to lick Eve. There's another where a helper is helping Eve start fisting herself then the helper just starts fisting Eve. And Eve in her rare English moment says, "You're so good at this". You see real chemistry, a spark and as far as I know ALS is the only site that does that type of scene.
There are the ALS fetishes, from speculums, gynecological inspections, 12 clothespins opening the woman up, there's some anal play, there are fists, helpers' fists, fingers and despite all the variation of the solo genre, they do it in a way that the woman looks like she's loving all of it.
Their picture sets are up there with the best in the industry. Besides having big resolutions, zip downloads, their models are dressed very normally, you will sometimes see a bikini that might not look like something someone would wear for anything but a porn shoot but for the most part, they dress like I would expect them to dress in everyday life. Their makeup looks nice but it's never overdone.
I mentioned in the pros that I even like their behind the scenes videos. This is because some have the helper in them and you'll get the cute, playful moments where the model grabs the helper's head like she's forcing her to give her oral and you'll get the laughing moments between the model and helper. I'm thinking those type of scenes bring in a little exhibitionism for the viewer since the helper is often dressed fully. Some voyeurism, especially in the BTS videos, kind of like you're a fly on the wall getting to see how the model and helper act towards each other when not recording the masturbation scene.
The navigation problems (this isn't complaining) include the "main" tab taking you to 8 newest updates with two buttons after those to take you to "photos" and "videos". Both of those are one long page of updates. The model list is your best bet unless it's a newer model, then just click on their newest set and it will take you to all their sets.
I would call it a true collector site because the content is exclusive and unique. You're not likely going to find similar sets as you find here or bigger, better photo sets, the photo sets are photos not screencaps and range from 250-500 photos in each. I will recommend it to anyone who can look over the complaints, as the content is excellent for anyone who likes any kind of porn.
I'll throw in here that I have Adult Time access through Fantasy Massage. I also have it through Pure Taboo. Like the others, I just logged in one day and had the access.
Thought this was kind of funny, just saw a set on In The Crack called, "Rear Admiral" lol.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, in 2018, one of the top 3 porn sites on the internet.
- Tiered memberships let you pick your level of quality and what all you can download.
- A fair but limited "cheap" option of $9.95, will go over the options in BL.
- If you're on this site it's for the models. Few if any sites regularly, consistently come up with so many high level models.
- Picture sets here are some of the best you'll find, including the production qualities with settings, clothing, even the colors.
- Updates every 3 days, each update includes videos, pictures and streaming "mini-vids".
- Download speeds are very high for me (90% and up of my max).
- A big site considering it's mostly solo models.
- CCBill is the biller.
- I join once a year for 1-2 months and download the content that has been released since my last join. I download and keep every set.
Cons:
- The tiered membership options won't be a favorite of some. Be sure to read in the BL to avoid a mistake I made last year.
- The older content had more of the gyno-style of porn but the newer isn't as bad, though it's still "In the Crack".
Bottom Line:
When I first started reviewing porn sites, I had standards, criteria but that was 12 years ago. I'm older now and probably dumber! What I do know though, every year around the American holidays, I join In the Crack. I do that because I'm always off some of December and it let's me download more than in other months. I won't call this the best site but I will say it's one of the top 2-3.
Porn, like so many other things, has tried to adapt to the consumers wants. Not In the Crack. They are still shooting the same porn they shot in 2001. It's 90% or more solo. The models look better here than on any site. The settings on this site are better than any other site. And every scene starts with the model fully dressed in appropriate clothes. Their makeup is near perfect and natural looking. The lighting is even top-notch. The only thing I could complain about with the content is it can be gynecological. But tell me, if you were told you were going to be a beautiful models gynecologist would you or I really complain?
One of my favorite parts is ITC is generally very selective of their models. And the ones that do good have multiple sets. An example of a model that they have multiple sets of who I think is fairly popular in mainstream porn, Gina Valentina, I've looked her content up on other sites but never downloaded and kept it. Her sets on ITC are some of the best on the site. I've always mentioned sites that make the models happy and how they seem to get better performances from the models. ITC does that.
The tiered memberships can be confusing, they have 6 tiers. I'll try to separate them:
Basic, Streaming and Standard all have major restrictions. The first two have no downloads of photos or videos. Standard has no photo downloads but does offer 360p and 720p video downloads.
Plus, 4K and Ultimate offer downloads of everything with Plus being my choice ($34.95), 4K just gives 4K videos on top of the Plus options. Ultimate ($69.95) brings in the next limits. It's completely unlimited. Standard, Plus and 4K have DL Limits (hourly, daily, monthly). Years ago, that was a major no-no but I have no problem staying within the limits. I download the 720p versions of the videos, most files average 450MB. I could easily run through 10GB (Hourly limit on Plus) in 15 minutes but because I am only downloading the last year's content, I only need to average about 4 sets/models per day, about 6GB. If I had never been a member and wanted to get all the content, I would pay for the Ultimate.
This content is unique because it's solo porn that starts out with the models looking very pretty, feminine even, lady-like and ends with them shoving their fist in themselves or a huge dildo. They cover everything in-between from teasing in their clothes (upskirts, bending over) to light touching and masturbation to the more "hardcore" masturbation. They're not in a rush like most 2018 porn seems to be.
It kind of makes me feel old as I start to tell about having to walk through 12 inches of snow to get to watch nicely-paced, erotic porn.
Not only are they the best at what they do but I'm not even for sure they have much competition these days. I wouldn't compare them to FTV since this is a little more personal than FTV. It's you and the model.
Navigation is as easy as possible. Coming up with a content count is a little harder. They've been releasing roughly 10 scenes per month since 2008. Before then they released usually 1 set per month and that goes back to 2001. It's well-over 1,200 scenes.
It's worth mentioning that I did not take points off for the split videos. They, like FTV, shoot each video with an action in it, then they split the video for the next action. It does allow you to download your favorite parts that way. I really don't know if I would prefer full videos but I'm okay with the split videos now.
I kept looking for 1 point to take off and found it while working on the review. The site logs me off about every 20 minutes. How is that for nitpicking?
This is very much a premium site. I know to some it's not premium, some will even hate it because they want hardcore or they want something ITC doesn't do but for me, a person who is rarely that happy with porn sites in 2018, it's perfect because it does what it says. It does it better than anyone else does. It reminds me of when you buy a music album and you don't have to skip one or two songs. For me, they get everything right. Except logging me off every 20 minutes.
In a few weeks, I'll have all of the 2018 content downloaded from ITC and this speaks to how much I like their content, I'll still be stopping by their site monthly to see who the new models are. I don't get that with other sites. I used to but now there's only 3-4 sites that get my attention throughout the year and ITC is one. I was due a 99 and honestly can only think of one other site that I would score this high.
I've never looked at the samples but I've never noticed any fuzzy or grainy pictures in the members area. I've been a member 50 of the last 60 months and have always thought the pictures here are some of the best on the internet.
It's not as bad as you think lol. I read your Fantasy Massage review that talks about Adult Time but what if someone just reads my review and doesn't see your comment about Adult Time? And I joined both of those, Taboo Sex and Fantasy Massage back in October which was well before they started including Adult Time.
The main difference I see in Dirty Time and Taboo Sex is Taboo Sex feels more polished and better executed, kind of like Dirty Time was their starting point and it evolved into Taboo Sex. I will admit that I hadn't seen your review of Taboo Sex. I originally was getting it confused with the Fetish Network. The newer content on it is similar to Taboo Sex's content. And when I joined it, it was one of those flash sales for 2 months for $15, so I didn't look any reviews up. I do still think there's a fine line with the acting part and that goes more into the script. I watched 3 scenes in a row that followed a very similar script but overall, I do like the content. If you haven't checked it out, check out Family Strokes. I thought it was really good, it's ran by the same people who run Team Skeet and has a lot of story, talking, acting in it. I thought their 4th of July scene of a "dad" having sex with his daughter's best friend, while the daughter grilled food about 10 ft away from them, was one of the best I've seen in this style of porn.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
