Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A no longer updating site in the Fantasy Massage network, that I personally think it the best site in the network even without updates.
- This massage niche was very popular for a few years then kind of dropped off. For me, the best ones didn't try to be that different from scene to scene and this one excels at that.
- Surprising overall quality considering it launched in 2008 and stopped updating in 2014, every video has up to 1080p quality downloads.
- Maybe the most realistic "fantasy" site possible since you would typically be nude or mostly nude.
- Very good DL speeds (80% and up of my max)
- Good navigation and despite the fact that it stopped updating in 2014, there's a fairly large catalog of content here (will go into in BL).
- One of the few niches that doesn't require acting ability!
- Photos with each scene that are screenshots.
Cons:
- This niche as much as any, has the "it's going to become repetitive" factor.
- As mentioned, it no longer updates.
- The scenes that try to do too much. Will go into in BL.
Bottom Line:
I reviewed another site from the Fantasy Massage network a few weeks ago and talked about how I thought this niche was very underrated but also poorly produced. A lot of massage scenes these days are just plain hardcore scenes that happen to look like a massage led into the sex.
Massage Parlor is the typical porn site of 2018. For me, it did way more right than wrong and it's one of the sites the network stopped updating. There's a part of me that believes these sites that stop updating, stop updating because they require more money to film, more time to plan, etc...
What stands out here is the vast majority of these scenes start out with the female masseuse talking to the male. The first 4-7 minutes is a believable massage, some of the masseuses start becoming aroused and grind their bodies into the man being massaged, they perform the massages in either robes that drape open or in sexy lingerie. It then progresses to either a handjob or a blowjob, usually further progressing into a 69 and the scenes last right at 20 minutes each.
That's believable to me. The massage scenes that turn into full sex, loud screaming and moaning, don't come off as believable. I would hate to think the main reason this site stopped updating was because it doesn't have much full sex on it but it does seem like that would also be believable. A couple of the other sites in the network also follow a similar beginning as Massage Parlor but go directly into full sex. I see massages as erotic, teasing and if done right, even mysterious. The temptation of going a little further than touching/massage is a realistic progression.
The good part is if you like this content there are 314 scenes on it and as mentioned in the pros, all 314 have up to 1080p downloadable versions.
You can see where they've tried alternate setups. They have some that have a masseuse in training, with the experienced masseuse playing something of a dominating role and forcing the trainee to give the male a blowjob. They have ones that the setting looks more like a hotel room than a massage parlor and a few that turn into multiple guys getting massages and blowjobs from the one masseuse.
I mentioned that acting isn't required in this niche and I believe that. The only thing required of the female masseuse is for her to give erotic rubs of her hand onto the man. This believably turns the masseuses on. Eye movements, eye contact, expressions, even breathing patterns work in that situation.
It's similar to my interest in handjob and CFNM porn. I like to see natural reactions from the females more than relying on their acting ability to make me believe they're enjoying themselves.
One of my favorite parts of this site are the models. One in particular, Chloe Amour, seems to love doing this kind of porn. She reminds me of Jessica Alba in some sort of odd way and she has 17 videos on this network.
Which is why I'm comfortable saying this style of porn is different than hardcore. Some of the models on here are extremely good at this style but are dull, dime-a-dozen, in regular porn.
This is one of those rare cases where I rate a site higher than its network. I've tried explaining that before and think I've figured it out. It's my way of saying, I would join this site whether it had the network access or not. I do think in this age of networks ruling porn, there are sites on those networks that stand out whether with our personal preferences or favorite niches. I've mostly heard negative comments from webmasters that say, "How can you score a site a X but only score the network that the site is IN a Y?" There, I explained it! The network itself is very good overall but I think the content on Massage Parlor shows that the network's other sites are very formulaic and are trying to meet some kind of criteria.
This network and site also gives me access to Adult Time but I am not figuring Adult Time into this review. This is solely on Massage Parlor. In my opinion, it's the best of the female gives male a massage niche.
Part of this is probably because you haven't heard me complain about my vision. I grew up in LA in the 90s, all around the bloods/crips gang war. When I was a teenager, I was stabbed just above my eye. I was okay but that was 20+ years ago. My eyesight is still okay too but there's a slight blur on any screen I look at. That blur seems to take away the visual differences between 4K and 1080p. One of the games I tried it on, Tomb Raider, was supposed to be one of the easiest to notice differences on and I did see small differences but I haven't been able to make out the differences my nephews see. It's why I have a PS4 Slim and Xbox One S and bought them a PS4 Pro and Xbox One X. This also goes into any talk of VR. My eyes go crazy when trying to focus on VR games or movies. To even further the experience I have with my vision, I don't like televisions or monitors bigger than 32". And those curved televisions make me motion sick. All of that has something to do with the eye injury and how my eyes process colors and movements.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Another of the newer sites that to me fall into a "Premium" category.
- I joined 2 months ago on a $14 for 2 months promo. It comes with the site Pretty Dirty and this review will cover both sites. Of note: As has been mentioned about Adult Time, this site now offers me Adult Time access.
- 318 scenes between Pure Taboo and Pretty Dirty, all have up to 1080p and 4 lesser resolution download options.
- It's the type of hardcore I prefer since it requires me to imagine a little before the sex starts.
- Overall, good acting in the scenes I've watched, I don't know if I just like Abella Danger so much that I think she's a great actress or if she really is. Several others do a good job too.
- DL speeds are very good (80% and up of max)
- Photo sets available but they are screenshots and can be downloaded.
- Mostly well-known pornstars but at least here you do see more from them than their best scream in piledriver.
Cons:
- This doesn't make much sense to me but the sites feel cluttered. Maybe it's the colors they use?
- For every good actress in porn, there's a dozen male "actors" that are only good at acting at acting.
- Not for sure why they have Pure Taboo and Pretty Dirty as different sites. Both sites have similar storylines.
Bottom Line:
It's kind of funny that I was just talking last week about not having any access to Adult Time, I then got access to it with the Fantasy Massage network and now I have access to it with the Pure Taboo/Pretty Dirty network. I'm not including that access in this review since I have no idea how long they will continue giving access to it.
I joined Pure Taboo back when they had the 2 months for $14 deal and didn't even know I had access to Pretty Dirty until the second week of my membership. Taboo is such a broad word when it comes to porn. I actually remember one of the first porn videos I ever saw being either Taboo 1 or Taboo 2 that was supposed to be a real brother and sister having sex. I was a teenager and just have vague memories of it. The taboos on this site are fairly common these days, going into the stepfamily niche and some that don't even use the word "step" in front of daughter or sister.
My interest in taboo is pretty simple. As long as I am convinced it's something that's not supposed to be happening, it's good enough for me. It's like when I admit to having a rebellious side and people in 2018 ask how I was rebellious, I shaved my head bald in high school. They roll their eyes. Then, I became a psychologist who refused to suggest prescriptions ... that always makes the jaws drop. Anyway, you're going to need your imagination with these scenes.
There's a decent amount of content between Pure Taboo and Pretty Dirty with 318 scenes as of December 3, 2018. Pretty Dirty no longer updates unless I'm doing something wrong. The newest update on it says 1 year ago. Pure Taboo updates twice a week.
I do think this content is rather unique because they almost go overboard with the stories. How many sites have this on a scene ... "WARNING: What you are about to watch is arguably the most shocking and graphic family roleplay scene we have ever filmed. We hope you find it equally arousing and disturbing!"
A recent Pure Taboo scene has Kendra Spade playing the stepdaughter role. She comes home to find her stepfather mad and fussing at her. She's fidgeting, he's blocking her from getting by while he continues to fuss and she pisses on herself in her tight jeans. I'm mostly indifferent to pissing scenes but this one is very sexy. They then work in the corny dialogue as the stepdad tells her to take her jeans off, you know, "so you don't track the pee through the house". She takes them off, he tells her that her panties are really soaked too. She starts to take them off and says, "Isn't this inappropriate?" He chuckles a little, "Yeah, if I was you real dad it would be." I can appreciate the laughs in porn but there's a fine line.
I should add that some of Pretty Dirty's scenes go more into "forced" scenes but you don't ever get the feeling it's non-consensual. Much like I said in the previous paragraph, I think this kind of porn also has a fine-line.
I believe the names of their scenes do as much to build a perception of the scenes as the actual scenes do. One of the newer ones is "The bad uncle returns" which I do think has more implication with it than the scene shows. The stories are mostly well thought out, acting overall is okay, so many of the female models seem to have spent the majority of their "acting" lives as sweet, innocent and go overboard with it. Kind of like the old pigtails and lollipops scenes.
And that leads to one problem with this type of porn. I would imagine that those who prefer the straight to action style will do a lot of fast-forwarding. Most of the scenes on Pure Taboo range from 30-55 minutes and a few didn't have much action until 15+ minutes had passed. That fine line shows up again. While it's easy to complain about scenes that jump right into sex, it's also easy to complain that "that's too much acting". I don't think I've ever opened a porn video and thought, "I'm going to kick back and watch 20 minutes of actors trying to convince me they're related!"
Overall though, Pure Taboo and Pretty Dirty are a very good combination that's worth checking out at least once. If you can get the two months for one price, I think it becomes the cheapest of these premium, story-based, porn sites.
The television/monitor I use is a Samsung 32" it does up to 1080p but I only download 720p unless 1080p is the lowest option.
I bought my nephews a Samsung 55" 4K television to go with their XB1 X, they swear there's a huge difference but this past weekend, they were out of town, so I tried it with both video games and porn. I don't see a big enough difference in either to justify the file size difference. I'm down to two 4TB My Passport external hard drives that are powered through the USB and have 1 older external also 4TB that has to be plugged into power that I keep in a closet as a backup. I also have two externals that are plugged into my PS4 and XB1.
The 4K porn files I watched were 17 minutes and 23 minutes each. Their size ranged from 9GB to 13GB, the 720p versions of those were 660MB and 923MB. I just can't see that trade off in size for what is only a negligible difference to my vision.
After trying every possible way to join Adult Time, I opened the Fantasy Massage network today to see that I now have access to Adult Time. I don't even know where to start with how this is going to change internet porn.
I will say at least for other sites/networks, as much content as Adult Time has, it looks near impossible to navigate unless you know which model you're looking for. I was checking out the Vivid channel in it since Vivid is probably my favorite hardcore site and the only way I can navigate it is by picking a model from the model list then going through to see which scenes they have.
It makes me wonder about 21Sextury too. Mine has 21Sextury, 21Sextreme and 21Naturals, the numbers look like their full video catalogs. I thought I had found one left out -- pictures -- but they're still on there too. As luck would have it, my fantasy massage membership is an annual one so I guess I will get to keep an eye on Adult Time the whole time.
Like they say, there's not enough time in a day lol.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The older, more mature, less innocent, side of FTV.
- The site has grown quite a bit and it has weekly updates.
- Much like FTV Girls, FTV MILFs focuses on mostly solo models, lots of outdoors teasing, public flashing, extended masturbation scenes.
- The majority of these models are not models that I know of. They very much remind me of amateurs that have decided they want to have some fun.
- Everything on the site is very high quality, it first opened in 2015, so all sets have 1080p videos and the photography FTV is known for.
- For the last 3-4 years, FTV MILFs and FTV Girls have been my favorite sites.
- Extras/bonus section is one of my favorite parts. You get a little bit of everything in it and it's all FTV MILFs content. From some extra store flashing videos to models filming themselves masturbate to taking showers. It stands out to me since it is FTV content instead of some licensed content from another site.
- DL speeds are very good for me (80% and up of my max).
Cons:
- I think some might question "MILFs" but they do a good job of covering the 28-50 year old range of models, there's just not as many of the upper 40s.
- The videos are split into parts, I've gotten used to it and even might prefer it now but I know it bothers some.
- If you're into FTV for the innocence, you're not going to get much of that here.
Bottom Line:
FTV MILFs was probably my most-anticipated site. I've been joining FTV Girls since 2006 and it's one of my favorite sites but my favorite models are mid to late 20s to early to mid 40s and this site delivers maybe the best selection of mostly amateur models in that age range.
I complained for years about the split videos. The newest one has 9 parts to it but as my tastes and interests change, I've found the more narrowed down clips that focus on one or two major actions (teasing, nude in public, masturbation, extreme masturbation) has let me pick the parts I'm most interested in instead of downloading what would be a huge file. Besides having 1080p option on all videos, most of the newer content also has 4K option. That newest set has 84 minutes of video, at 1080p, that would be a large file, at 4K with 12,000 bitrate it would be massive. The split videos allow you to watch your preferred parts without having to fast forward.
To me, FTV MILFs excels because it removes the innocence of FTV Girls. A lot of these models look like regular women. You just get the feeling that when the record button is pushed, they let go of any inhibitions and nearly all give top-notch performances. You can even see an almost "joy/release" on their face when they start flashing in public.
Here's some numbers since this site is still relatively new:
- Roughly 180 models, give or take a couple.
- Each model has video that ranges from 50-90 minutes total, split into parts.
- Each model has 200-400 pictures in as many as 5 different outfits.
- Around 30 bonus scenes and/or photo sets.
The navigation of the site works as good as you'll find. There's a model list that uses icons to tell you what actions are in each set, you can filter the models by date of their scenes release, age, bra size, height. There's also a lettered search to search by the first letter of their name. There's a "girl/girl" tab, too. If you favor the scenes with public nudity, you click on the icon "Nu!" and your results will have all of the scenes with public nudity.
For me, they're getting into the area of doing everything right. At one time, I used to think they should update more but the amount of content in one scene is much more than you get in most 2-3 updates on other sites. It's possible that me opening up more to the split videos has shown me just how much time and effort is put into the scenes since say split video #5 will have the model in a completely new location with a new outfit on and she'll be doing something completely different than in split video #4.
The models ages range from 24 (one of those), 26 (one of those), 27 - 49. The MILFs category has always been one that we've joked about since an 18 year old model could be a MILF in real life. And I think anything above 50 would start going into another category.
There are some hardcore scenes on this site too. I don't really like those as well but they're not that common. And they seemed to have stopped in 2017. At least based on the HC icon search. I might be in the minority on this one but there are so many hardcore sites these days that I'm completely fine with FTV sticking to mostly solo with a few girl/girl scenes thrown in.
I ran out of room in the pros. The biller is CCBill and this might not seem like much but they've (FTV) updated their login screen. Used to, it was the box that popped up in the middle of your screen. A very annoying box that stopped you from clicking on your join email to see your username/password. You would have to submit a wrong login to get it to lower the login box. Now, it's just a blank page with username/password and it saves to your browser.
I don't know how much this shows my interest and constant enjoyment of FTV but I've had a membership to FTV Girls for nearly 5 straight years and a membership to FTV MILFs for a little over a year straight. Those one updates per week, for me, have been better than what a lot of sites release in a month. I had to reserve a separate external hard drive just for FTV content.
One thing of note, the newest update is shot in Portugal which is very different for FTV as they usually shoot on the west coast of the United States but I'm guessing it might go into some legal nonsense with the United States' fear of nudity.
If you like MILFs showing very rare levels of confidence for porn, FTV's style of shooting, public flashing, some public masturbation, anything solo, high quality pictures that are some of the best in the industry, this site is a must join for at least one month. I used to join it when I renewed my FTV Girls membership as a cross-sale, seems like it was $7 for a week and it is full access, even try it that way. It's some of the best content I've ever seen and the only thing stopping it from being higher scored is the amount of content which could be higher, if I'm nitpicking.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A relatively large site in the Fantasy Massage network. Focuses mostly on M/F but there are F/F and up to threesomes.
- Some well-known models and others that might be more mainstream than I realize but all are attractive.
- DL speeds are very good (80% of my max and above).
- Oldest content dates back to 2009 and the videos all have 1080p options, picture set with each scene and can be downloaded in zip files.
- I'm guessing it's one of the oldest massage sites. It updates weekly and has 529 scenes as of 11/13/2018.
- Very good mixture of models, it seems at one time they were going for Asian models but there are other races.
- Any site that's been around since say around 2010, has a high collector potential since a lot of these models have stopped modeling. They have one of my favorites in multiple scenes, the highly underrated Lana Violet.
Cons:
- It's mostly nitpicking, model list includes men and there's no way to filter the men out. Unless I missed it.
- Some scenes never really feel like a massage scene. That could be the use of known pornstars. No offense is meant to Asa Akira but as soon as I see her I think porn!
Bottom Line:
I have to admit something about my interest in this genre. Over the last few months, I started dating an Esthetician. It has opened my eyes to this profession, massages and waxes. I've also talked about how I sometimes delve into the dark world of fantasizing about the woman I'm with doing things with other men. Trust me, it's not that I like that side of me but it works.
Nuru Massage's older content especially goes into that part of massages. The newer content does to an extent but some of it really just feels like it could be a scene in a normal porn movie. The basis, again, especially in the older scenes, is a man (usually) goes to get a massage. The masseuse oils him up, giving him peeks up her skirt, at her cleavage and usually takes the porn turn when she notices the tent being pitched by the towel laying across his crotch. This works for me. Especially with the Asian models. Because the woman I've been dating is Filipino and the minute she thinks sex might happen she's ready. Doubt it if you must but there's at least one other member on here with a Filipino wife who would tell you the same thing. So, I really prefer the scenes with the Asian models.
I think these sites, any of them, these days are stuck with the models they have access to and more and more, whether on Bang Bros or Brazzers, there's a lack of interest/passion. Some of the newer scenes here at Nuru Massage also have that problem. The good part is, as far back as their content goes, you can get HD quality videos. It's kind of like you don't have to start at the newest content to find the best quality.
Any site that stays within their theme/niche has the potential to become repetitive but I will say they do a good job here of mixing things up. You get some F/F scenes, some with F/F/F, some M/F/F and the standard M/F which for me is the most believable. I think if I had the chance to produce a scene or two, I would look into working in more from less. Every scene doesn't have to progress to sex. Have it stop at a handjob or a blowjob. With the name "fantasy" in the network name, I would play more to that. Instead of following every other hardcore porn scene.
The models are very attractive. One of the ones I didn't know of that I really like is Rilynn Rae, other longtime favorites like Uma Jolie, even everybody's favorite MILF Brandi Love (she has a really good scene with Uma Jolie on All Girl Massage, in this network.) Keisha Grey is here with all her lovely curves. And as mentioned, Lana Violet who I originally knew of thanks to Twistys years ago. I find scenes of her about twice a year.
You also get the niche on top of niche with some scenes playing into the step-family niche. That is seen more on the All Girl Massage site with stepmoms and stepdaughters massaging each other. But there are some on Nuru as well. You know when Brandi Love shows up she's somebody's stepmother!
The navigation is very good across the network even. It's a Gamma network so if you've been a member of any of the Fame Digital networks, it works like those do. You have the different network sites on the left and can go to each seamlessly. At the top you have categories, which is more useful here than on a lot of sites because you can pick the actions you want to see and it lists them by the action. I'll point out here that I myself like the "Pussy rubbing cock" action and while it might be a little too broad in its results, it does pull out (not intended) the scenes with that great tease.
They have the model list with the problem mentioned in the cons but that's pretty common for networks to include the males in the list. I really believe the only problem that can be legitimately be complained about is it can become repetitive. My years of only joining solo sites tells that repetitive doesn't bother me as long as it's good repetitive. Most of this content is good. It adds almost a softer side to hardcore but doesn't fall into heartcore area.
The other complaint is my own. Just mix it up some, beyond F/F scenes and F/F/F scenes. Have the masseuse use a wand massager on the guy's back and thighs and then in-between her and him. It's minor stuff that I think would keep the content fresher. No complaints on the quality. I will say the picture sets are screenshots from the videos so it's not a 50-100 picture set of just the female. It's hard to complain about that these days since a lot of sites are going completely away from pictures. As that old saying goes something is better than nothing. I think this site would appeal to those who like hardcore, those who like a theme and those who know an Esthetician who likes to tell you about her experiences doing waxes (close enough to massages) and how the clients (both female and male) "respond". I haven't checked out all of the network yet but I will and maybe some of my own twisted fantasies are in here somewhere. As a network it's very good and recommended.
I've heard a lot about Adult Time, is it a separate site? Or a hub? I've tried finding it but hard to believe, a Google search for "adult time" brought up an adult watch!
I'm wondering if it has to do with the Gamma billing since I think they manage 21Sextury and all the Fame Digital sites and networks.
I was a member on it awhile back and it had a lot of foreign porn from the 60s, 70s and 80s on it. There was also some very unusual content on it. Maybe amateur from Brazil, 70s. You can browse and even preview most of their videos.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the most technically-impressive, female-friendly, somewhat-artsy, websites on the internet.
- A more sexual version of Met-Art from Met-Art.
- Top-tier female models, including some favorites from Met-Art doing things they don't do on Met-Art.
- Very good fetish content, especially clothing fetishes.
- Production values are so high you might think you're watching a blockbuster Hollywood film.
- Photos and videos are both well-represented. Will go further in BL.
- Navigation is excellent and usually straight-forward.
- If you're into artsy hardcore they have quite a few sets where the models wear clothing and even partial masks to add to the plot.
- Download speeds are very good (85% of max).
- Not surprising to me but the solo sets are my favorites on here and should be joined by solo fans just for those.
- At this point, has a lot of content.
- Updates daily
Cons:
- It's going to be too artsy for some. Some are going to say, "Why are you covering that pretty model's face?"
- The hardcore sets are hit or miss, some are very good and others are average at best.
- Those live girl ads.
Bottom Line:
It seems fitting that I review Sex Art after reviewing X-Art last week. I've noted before on nearly every site owned or managed by Met-Art that you're going to have trouble finding much to complain about. Sex Art is the same way. Just pulling out numbers, resolutions, it's very impressive to see how much work they put into their site and content. I get the feeling they have someone who is live on each set and this person is OCD, they go around making sure every single object in the room is perfect, nothing distracting is going on and that appeals to me to a point. It also can become boring.
I still don't understand why Met-Art started Sex Art then came out with Met Art X. I'm pretty sure Met Art X is just solo masturbation but Sex Art has that too. Get the OCD person in there. Things are getting confusing. I'm going to do the numbers first because that's where Sex Art is at its best.
1,001 films as they call them, scenes, videos to most. Their lowest available high resolution is 1080p dating back to film #1. There are around 250 films with the 4K option, too. Each of these films can be downloaded in resolutions from 270p, 360p, 720p, 1080p and 4K if newer. They are some of the crispest videos I've watched. Sound is good and clear, too.
1,400 photo sets, roughly 4500 long end resolution, the amount of photos does vary from maybe 70 to 150. They are available to download in 3 different sizes. Maybe better than any site, these models almost always start out dressed in regular clothes. Similar sites do this too but a lot of them get by with the "panties and bra are fully clothed". If this helps put some perspective on it, I have a folder with 768 of their photo sets in it.
580 female models, so quite a few have more than 1 video or photo set. I used to think Sex Art was going to get my first-ever 100 score. I know the content is often vanilla to hardcore fans but they do everything they're supposed to do and surpass nearly all standards. I've not pulled the trigger on the 100 for a few reasons. The live girl ads. They're not really obtrusive but I've almost clicked them a dozen times. The videos that don't have any chemistry hurts some. It's just not quite there. And that's okay, too. I'm sure if they fixed those, I would find something else to complain about!
The last time I reviewed both Sex Art and X-Art, I felt Sex Art was a little better and I still feel that way. I see Sex Art as 5-6 points better than X-Art. Though, neither should take offense, I doubt any of the other "heartcore" sites would get an 80 from me. It's kind of strange to say this but if this was just a solo site, the score would be higher. They're going to tell me to try Met-Art X.
They have pulled away from the "series" style of films and I think that's a good move. They had ongoing series like "Girls Love Sex" and "Kamikaze Love" but I think it limited them.
They have a relationship with models that I've tried to think of a word to use to describe it but can't figure it out. As an example, maybe she's still very active but a set last week has Suzie Carina in it and I've not see her in nearly a decade. She still looks great, too. It's almost like they can get any model that's active. One of my favorites is Lorena B, she's a good example of how they have multiple videos/photos of one model. She has 34 photo sets and 15 videos on here.
While I'm happy with the navigation some might say it's too minimal. The scenes have tags on them and you can use those to find scenes with the same tags but there's no "category" search. So, if you like anal, you have to hope someone tagged a scene as anal. I did a search on the site to see if "anal" brings up anal scenes and I don't think it works. One of the results was a set named, "Analogies". That's where being a regular member works against a review. I join and can look back to see what I last downloaded and just start from there.
The models here, like other heartcore sites, are slender or athletic, not a lot of racial diversity but there is some and tattoos and implants are minimal. The picture sets here, like X-Art, are my favorite part. I like the Sex Art videos a little more. I join twice a year, actually moved my membership month up a bit this year since I've bumped off some sites from my regular rotation. I hope they continue doing variations in the fetishes (hose, panties, short-shorts) as I think it's a newer strength for their site. If you're used to the old Met-Art it can be fun being a member here since you get in the routine of the photo sets stopping at the fully nude parts but they go all the way here. A 96 might be as high as I can go on Sex Art and I would recommend it to those into clothing fetishes, solo models, pretty models, some of the models look too young models and of course for those who like heartcore style male/female porn
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the internet's top artsy but hardcore sites.
- The quality throughout is very high.
- Download speeds are very good (80% of my max) but the site sometimes is a bit slow to load. It's not my internet and my computer is considered a still viable computer in video gaming. I'll go a little more into in the BL.
- The models. Some of the prettiest models in the world and they use high production values.
- Update schedule isn't consistent but it works out to 3-4 updates a week.
- CCBill as the biller, there was a cross-sale and it was checked, it's to their other site. Kind of hard to see because their signup page is black.
- If you've ever liked their content, you probably still will. I think they're one of the most consistent sites.
- While it has nearly 1,000 videos, I join it for for the picture sets. They have some of the best picture sets I've ever seen.
- It's one of the few standalone sites these days that gives you your money's worth and more.
Cons:
- My score reflects the 5 point automatic drop. I hate this site's navigation. It annoys the hell out of me. The videos navigation is very good. The model's list is very good. The updates, which is the only way to find the photo sets, is one long page of scrolling. I expected a change on that but it hasn't happened.
- I'm trying not to use the word "heartcore" because I for some reason really like this site but don't typically like heartcore. But that is very much a con for some. It's kind of mushy.
Bottom Line:
X-Art to me is a site you could join for a year and wouldn't get tired of the content, if you like the content. And, it might take a year to get to the bottom of the updates page! Why isn't that fixed? If nothing else, easy fix here, stick a photos "tab" up there with "videos" and have 30-40 photo sets per page. I think I broke my my mouse's scrolling wheel on this site. I have no idea how much content there is overall because I get to 2013 and stop scrolling but open the videos, 40 per page, 24 pages. I not only know roughly how many videos but I can jump from page to page too. I was going to just do a 5 point deduction, but I believe an 8 point deduction is more fitting.
That wouldn't be a problem but I come for the photo sets. That's really my only legit complaint. I thought I had got around it. There's a drop-down menu that has "photos" in it. But all that did was put all the photo sets on the long, scrolling page!
If you've not been to X-Art before, it fits that "female-friendly" genre of porn. I hope I'm not being sexist by saying that. I know women who love the most hardcore porn on the internet. So, I'll say, in general, this is a more "realistic", mushy, kind of lovey style of porn. They still get very hardcore at times but it's done tastefully. That was the hardest paragraph I've ever typed in a review!
As I've gotten older, I have started liking the teen-style models but they're still not my favorites. And most of the models here fit the teen-type, slender, very pretty, if there are tattoos you don't see them often and implants are either a no-no or very rare. It's also not just male/female. They have quite a bit of lesbian too and some solo too.
I don't know if this is a negative but I like their pictures better than the videos. It's most-likely me. I haven't been joining or downloading much what I call "regular porn videos". I have downloaded 38 (exact count) so far at X-Art, so it's not that the videos are bad. Their picture sets have my favorite thing in porn photos, the models going from (usually)dressed fully to fully nude and they do enough of the in-between dressed and nude photos in their sets. They excel at it. The newest photo update wasn't one of my favorites. It's titled "Sex with Gymnasts". It's a lesbian set. There's nothing in the photos to make me think they're gymnasts. I was excited to download and view it. There's no stretching or upskirt splits. And they're nearly nude at the beginning! I hear gymnasts and I think tight shorts or tight leggings. But that's rare for them.
Videos are 965 in count, since January 2016, they've had the 4K option on the videos. It is a little sporadic back when they first started it but they're offering it on all of the newer videos. This shows the quality, at least to me, over those 965 videos, 961 have 1080p option. They also have 720p, 540p and 480p. The pictures are all downloadable and are 4000 long end in the "large" download file.
I even think I understand why I like their photos so much, the lighting is very natural. So you don't get the real warm colors like some sites use but you also do get crisp colors and I would even say the colors are more of a cool color. That's become more important as I've got older and my eyes don't especially like bright, vivid colors.
I also know why the site loads so slowly. It's that long scrolling page. Their "thumbnails" for each set are 350x400 resolution and I would estimate there's over 2,000 of those on that page.
I do like their solo videos. They have some with big toys and some with little toys and the models, as said, are very pretty.
As for the main male/female content: I've at least got over the feeling that it's silly to try and project love in a porn video but it's not just that. It's the mushy part that I don't do well with. I don't even do that mushy stuff in my life. They're up there making love. And I think that's where it loses me because I like the teasing and the playfulness and then they should go at it like jackrabbits. They never seem to respond to the teasing and playfulness like they've been teased. It's still not a big negative. The content is popular with some people and I'm okay with that.
The site is still a top site that's worth joining at least once. Can't complain at all about the technical quality or what looks like someone spends some time actually setting the scenes up. Just don't expect any double ass to mouth or even hair-pulling. Maybe that's why I like the solo videos better? Some of those solo ones look like they're trying to tear their insides out.
With solo content becoming more rare and focus on photos becoming even rarer, those who like those should definitely check this site out. And their lesbian content is on par with a typical lesbian scene. If they would fix that scrolling page so I could see all the photo sets, I would jump it up to 96-98 but that page will annoy some people. So, I'm going with a 90.
And as someone that's moved from Los Angeles to Miami to Dallas to Tennessee, I can tell you, I sometimes can't understand English.
My favorite accent from a woman is North Texas. Met this woman in North Texas, we were talking, I hadn't noticed too much of an accent, so I said, "You from here?" She smiled and said, "Yea, I'm from Tax-us". To me, accents and the body language that comes with them is sexier than the words.
I originally picked "others" but switched it to "new fetishes". Some examples:
Ashley Fires - A somewhat vanilla solo model that seemed very held back by the genre. In the Crack showed her insane flexibility (physically), and now she's a dominatrix. I'm positive her career saw a boost from those new fetishes.
Isis Love - To me the very best example. Isis was a mid-tier Latina hardcore model. She seemed out of place in most scenes (typical man dominant, woman submissive). She landed on Kink.com and started doing mostly dominant scenes and I think she has as much content on Kink as just about anyone. She was also well into her 30s when the switch happened.
Brandi Love - I can remember seeing her back in the early 2000s. She was a dime a dozen, blonde, stereotypical airhead model. Ten years pass and she's doing seductive roles as the older woman seducing younger men and women. And that too saved her career and made her a huge star.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the better blowjob-focused sites/networks.
- Has seen a lot of change in both how the site looks and how it works, all for the positive.
- An interesting feature by adding a live intercourse video every few days. As I've said before, at least this one is trying.
- Averages right at one update per day (across the network).
- Has some kinkiness, from gaping to pissing to deep-throating, pretty sure Veronica Avluv can't film a scene without pissing in it.
- Mostly known porn stars. Sometimes that's a pro, sometimes a con.
- Download speeds are very good (80% of max).
- Their live site, Immoral Live, really helps the network as a whole. It's really the only site on this network that goes into sex and the content on it is pretty good. You can watch live or download the recorded show.
- The navigation works better than I remember it working, this network is the same as the old My XXX Pass. But see cons...
- Pretty big network, will go into in BL
Cons:
- Navigation works well but man is it ever cluttered? Don't mind me, I'm the OCD guy. I will go further on this in the BL (that's how much it annoys me).
- Eventually, you can have too many blowjobs. It can be quite repetitive. The site names tell you that: Throated, Mommy Blows Best, 1000 Facials, Only Teen Blowjobs and Immoral Live.
- The network itself isn't bad for ads but there was a pre-checked cross-sale and seconds after unchecking it and submitting my payment, a pop up popped up for the exact SAME offer they offered in the pre-checked cross-sale!
Bottom Line:
I'm really not looking to be too harsh. This network has always been a solid network. They do a lot of things right. Including:
Picture sets that you can download
High quality videos (4K available on the newer ones).
Very large catalog of content and the site itself is a "clean" site unless you look at the menu toolbar.
It's there that you have these options:
Videos, Pornstars, Pictures, Forum, Interactive Porn, Free scene, Dating, Live Sex, Specials. That's a lot in one horizontal bar, right? There's another one above it! Above it, you have your profile, the Blow Pass logo or homepage button, Throated, 1000 Facials, Mommy Blows Best, Only Teen Blowjobs and Immoral Live ... but wait, there's also a clock that is counting down the time to the next Immoral Live show too.
I've said it many times, if my dad ever taught me one thing that I hold onto it's KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid). I'm not really complaining that much but as nice as this network looks, it looks like they would work on the clutter and double ad mentioned in the cons.
The content here is good. The models are mostly American, tattoos and implants are common. The numbers are very good:
3,897 scenes, the earliest update dates back to 2005 and it was one of my favorite models, Tiffany Taylor. Most if not all scenes have photos too.
You will run into the lower quality problems in the older scenes. The oldest ones are 360p. From there, you get random quality.
Immoral Live has the best quality with up to 4K options, its content dates back to 2011 and the 2011 videos have up to 1080p. Very little to complain about there.
The other sites date back in the 2005-2006 range and the first 5 years of those sites have varying quality. The newer content has 1080p but not 4K.
They have nearly 2,000 models (1920 or so). I'll continue to return to that one con, the amount of blowjobs are great for those into oral scenes but for me any niche like this will become boring.
I will say Throated can be somewhat extreme. I know we've had discussions about what constitutes a deep-throat and for me it's mascara dripping down the model's face and dry heave sounds, they have both of those. I know that there are some who prefer that style of oral sex, they would really like this network.
In scoring this site, I am scoring it a little higher than I see it. It's similar to when someone tries a solo site and they expected more than solo. I don't think it's fair of me to go taking points away for reasons that might not bother others.
There's a lot of content with a lot of models. Many older A-list models too, I even seen Rebecca Linares in the model list. I had completely forgot about her. There's also plenty of cute, newer models like Jenna Fox, Kitty Carerra and one of my old favorites that I had forgot about Cindy Starfall. So, it's okay for me as a collector and I think it's very good for someone looking for a large collection.
They have multiple scenes of many of the models, like Cindy Starfall, who has a scene as far back as 2012 and they just updated with a new scene of her here in 2018. She has 7 scenes, total. To go back to a strength for a site like this one and it's why I most likely remembered it in a positive way, some of their photo sets are very good. It fits here because my favorite photo set of Cindy Starfall is from this network.
I don't remember if I complained about this in my review of the network when it was My XXX Pass but one of the more frustrating parts for me is that the blowjob rarely progresses. I know blowjob is in the name and people will complain if anything more than a blowjob happens but that in and of itself is what leads to the boredom. I have had the same type of complaint with handjob sites and though it goes against the name, I like CFNM sites that end up having the woman naked too.
I would review Immoral Live separately because I do think it adds way more than would be expected but I've yet to be able to watch one of the shows live. Looks like the next live show is Thursday morning at 9 AM EST. I'm in an office at 9 AM. The recorded scenes I've watched are pretty good.
It's a good network overall that has a new name and a new coat of paint. It would be rated higher for those who are into the more extreme parts I listed above and who are into blowjob porn. I'll grab the scenes I've lost from my collection over the years. There's also a lot of content but keep in the mind the technical limitations of the older content, too.
I have seen a few squirting scenes on Sapphic Erotica (same network) but they don't have a tag for squirting. They do have a tag for peeing. The newest peeing scene on Give Me Pink is from December 2007, model is Chrystina. The newer content on Give Me Pink (2013 forward) has removed the milk enema also. The site has 15 peeing scenes total but all are from 2007 and back. Is it just me or are there less peeing scenes these days? I remember back when it seemed like 21 Sextury had at least 1-2 new peeing scenes each week.
I've always preferred fingers. There are even scenes that I could use to show how good fingers can be.
The producer/site that does fingers best is Viv Thomas. Any lesbian scene from his site featuring Eve Angel, Sophie Moone, Sandra Shine, Jo and Lisa, are some of the most "touchy" lesbian scenes you will see. If I ever had a major problem with dildos it's in solo porn. It blocks what I want to see.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the largest and in my opinion, best, lesbian sites.
- Massive catalog of content, earliest content dates back to 2003.
- Is now part of a network (Sapphix) which includes Give Me Pink and Fist Flush.
- Carries a tagline that fits ... "Pretty girls doing it right". See cons.
- Very high technical quality on videos and photos.
- Good DL speeds (80-85% of max)
- Billing, canceling, is easy though I'm not familiar with the biller (AXSCharge), original billing was handled by Rocketpay but canceling went through AXSCharge, maybe it's the same company?
- Carries a level of eroticism that only Viv Thomas matched.
- Many A-list Euro models.
- More tribbing than any site that I know of.
- Very clean website design, no ads in the members area, comes off as professional.
- Falls into either the top 10 or top 5 all-time in all genres.
- Very fast "fixes" to site problems, will explain in BL.
Cons:
- The biggest complaint that I will call legitimate but won't say I care about it, is a real lesbian will say these models aren't lesbians.
- Updates have slowed on Sapphic Erotica to one every 4 days. Maybe not a con in the truest sense but I'm nitpicking.
- The mainstream era (2011-2014) content just doesn't do much for me.
Bottom Line:
Lesbian porn is one of the most difficult genres for me to review. My closest co-worker for the last 5 years, is 100%, way out of the closet, lesbian. She doesn't "look" like a lesbian. The first time we worked together, she introduced herself and her sexual preference to me by saying, "You better not start flirting with my girlfriend." But I did! Part of this review is based on her opinion that she has shared with me. Her biggest problem with lesbian porn is she says it's just not realistic. Then she laughs and says, "Or we're just not very good at it". She crushed my every lesbian fantasy by saying she's never tribbed and neither has any of her lesbian friends. So, I'll stop with that part and get to my view of lesbian porn since who needs reality when there's 2-4 very pretty women kissing and naked?
Sapphic Erotica's tagline for as long as I can remember has been, "pretty girls doing it right". In all my years on PU, I've made it pretty clear that I like natural women BUT I don't hold tattoos against the models and sometimes I even like the tattoos (see Dragon Lily, Satine Phoenix and Regan Reese). I also like natural boobs but (not a big but) I can look over implants. I've told about one of the models Sapphic Erotica has a lot of content of named Zafira. One of the prettiest mid-2000s Euro models. She realized one of her boobs was bigger than the other so she had implants (nearly same size as natural) to even them out. She falls into that category of "more people would say those are natural than implants". That's the type of implants I have no problems with.
Which to me is what Sapphic Erotica goes for with the "pretty girls doing it right" tagline. You would be hard-pressed to find another site with more feminine, natural, no tattoos, no implants, models, than Sapphic Erotica.
So, if you're into 18-24 year old, mostly slender, some average/sporty builds with hardly no tattoos, no implants, Sapphic Erotica, a lesbian site, is a site you would probably love. Some liked to call this style of models and porn, "Glam" but this isn't glam. It's "normal", sorry dating is horrible in 2018, trying to find a "normal" woman who doesn't kill spiders with her hand, drinks a 12 pack of beer and goes hunting on the weekend is becoming increasingly hard. These are what people call, "girly-girls". They know they're pretty and they want you to know it too.
Sapphic Erotica is right up there with Viv Thomas when it comes to creating passionate sex films. Sex Art tries it but I don't think it works as good with a man and woman as it does with 2 or 4 women. Most of the scenes start off with the models fully-clothed (skimpy). And usually ends with one pretty girl's butthole pressed down on the other pretty girl's tongue. In-between, there's deep kissing, heavy touching, nipple-squeezing, fingering (toys aren't too common), dry-humping that turns into tribbing and of course, lots of 69s.
That's real to me! I very easily can imagine two college girls being bored, admiring how pretty the other is then suddenly getting lost in 30 minutes of lesbian sex.
Here's the numbers:
1,747 scenes (videos and downloadable pictures) They have been offering 4K on all videos since late 2015 and 1080p on all videos since late 2006!
The models number is a bit harder to find since the model list covers Give Me Pink, Fist Flush and Sapphic Erotica and it's over 1,000.
In my review of their network, I noted that I scored Give Me Pink higher than the full network. The reason was a glitch in the navigation of the network that made it very hard to separate the sites. Well, they fixed it. So, I would change their tagline to, "Webmasters doing it right". The navigation on Sapphix (network hub) lets you click the drop down box and pick which site you want to see content from, in this example, Sapphic Erotica. Where the glitch was happening was when I clicked on any page except page 1, it wouldn't load. That's fixed and you can now search from within each site with the "tags" that are very useful and accurate.
The part I call the "mainstream era" is an era of Sapphic Erotica where the content became very formulaic. The good part is, pretty girls, have been part of their formula the whole time. I don't know what the not-to-distant future of porn is but I do believe Sapphic Erotica and this Sapphix network has established itself as the top lesbian/all girl network. My scoring changed on Sapphix once they got the navigation problem fixed so it's a 95 and Sapphic Erotica to me, is also a 95. I mainly scored them this way because I don't think you even need an interest in Give Me Pink or Fist Flush to get your money's worth with a subscription. Those two sites are like icing on the cake or gravy on your mashed potatoes or two wet clits sticking together.
I have a 32" Samsung Smart TV hooked up to my PC and to my Xbox. You have to be careful doing it this way because a lot of these newer televisions are cutting corners, so some only have 1 HDMI and others max out at 720p (terrible as a PC monitor, for my settings). I ended up returning 2 before paying about $125 more for the highest end Samsung 32" Best Buy had. It's very good as a PC monitor, near perfect for Xbox games and watching porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Now part of a network (Sapphix). Personally, I would join it by itself for the price but you also get the excellent Sapphic Erotica with it and Fist Flush (less than 100 scenes).
- Originally one of the first sites to exclusively record almost "vulgar" masturbation by the top European models (pre-2010). You'll even notice a comment here on PU from 2010 that talks about it no longer updating.
- It's updating, not a lot but it is updating.
- Seems to have some conflicting plots in the newer content, some scenes are of a model masturbating while she watches porn that you can see on the video. Others are more in the traditional Give Me Pink style, which I will go into.
- Excellent download speeds and it's needed, the 4K scenes are upwards of 15GB.
- The archive of this site could be the best archive you're going to find for unique content of the top models from the Euro models from 2005-2010.
Cons:
- Well, if you never thought about what it would be like to be a gynecologist, you might not like some of the content.
- Solo porn isn't as popular these days and this is a solo site.
- Still baffled by the milk shooting out of the butt scenes.
Bottom Line:
I decided to go ahead and review Give Me Pink since there's no new info on it here on PU. I also did a review for Sapphix, the network they now share with Sapphic Erotica and Fist Flush.
The 2005-2010 era of porn was special to me. I really hadn't paid much attention to European porn until that era. Eve Angel is my favorite but there are others like Sophie Moone, Sandy from Club Sandy, Sandra Shine, Mia Stone, Peaches and Eufrat, these six (I hope that's the six) where labeled by me as "The no take dick six". It wasn't the nicest label since it's based on all of them having interviews with mostly broken English where they say they no take dick. All of them did at one point in their careers but once the Euro boom started, they refused to be with men. My belief is these models knew their performances as solo and lesbian models would determine if they could keep making porn without being with a man.
A few others worth mentioning: Zafira, Anette Dawn and Anetta Keys. These models with the 6 from above dominated the porn world, every site you went to had them featured. You could join Twistys (an American site) and there they were. Twistys loved Anette Dawn so much that they gave her, her own solo site. Eve, Sandy and Sandra had their own solo sites too. Maybe I'm being too sentimental but these models did the things that you see porn users complaining about now, like eye contact, expressions, stripping and bringing out erotic thoughts in your mind.
Then came Give Me Pink. A site that looked like most Euro sites but it was very different. Models that we were used to seeing finger themselves softly, were bouncing their ankles up around their ears and sticking whatever they could find in them. They were visibly wet, dildos were coming out soaked with their white liquids. I really liked it but am sure I once complained that it was "weird" and maybe even repetitive. The weirdness was mostly towards the use of milk shooting out of the model's butt. It killed the eroticism for me. I would sit there and think, "Did she just fart?"
Even so, the content was very unique for the time period and it was the only way you could see "all" of some of these models. That was the selling point, plus it had that all-important, "100% exclusive" but the site did stop updating. Before I take too much credit of digging through 2,000+ scenes to figure out which are Give Me Pink scenes, they do have a tag that let's you see just the Give Me Pink content. That's a nice feature and much appreciated.
I've went through and can see that the content stopped on 5/5/2009. It started back on 7/8/2013. Now, you can see why some might be surprised to see it back again, over 4 years of no content.
Since 7/8/2013, they have released 2 full scenes per month, that's a full video and photo set that is a professional-level photo set for download and they also offer the video caps for viewing. I used the comparison in my review of the network and will again, this content reminds me of In the Crack. Extremely high quality, you can download the videos in multiple formats and starting in 2015, the videos even include a 4K option.
The video style has changed some in the 2018 scenes. They're using a new style by having the models watch porn on their laptop. You can see the porn they're watching and it's from a tube site! I like this newer style. The classic, almost hardcore, masturbation is still great so this is a welcome change.
Here's my count:
The "older" content prior to their hiatus has 244 scenes (video and photo set) they were updating once a week back then.
The newer content (2013 forward) has 122 scenes. That's a lot of newer content that is probably being looked over by those that don't know the site is back.
I think the archived content alone would appeal to collectors and the newer content even has some "old favorites". Like Cindy Hope, who has content in the older content and in the newer content too. I would say it's a very good alternative for those looking for porn similar to In the Crack. I'm even thinking someone asked the question about content similar to In the Crack. Plus, you get Sapphic Erotica, the best lesbian site, added to it.
If you join "Sapphix" the network, be sure to click on "movies" from there you will see a link that says "search by tag". You can then pick Give Me Pink or Fist Flush or Sapphic Erotica. They also have a button on the main page, a drop-down box, that doesn't work. It shows you the first page but none of the others. This is similar to hitting the jackpot for a collector. And yes, the score is higher on the site than the network. I've only done that a few times in the past and it's similar. As I mentioned in this review, the network button for separating the content into each site doesn't work. The initial page I saw when joining advertised 7 sites with Sapphic, I only received 2 with Sapphic. It's a minimal point difference but it just shows they need to fix the network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network that made me think I had found heaven but am thinking this might be hell.
- Two of the greatest "girl" sites, Sapphic Erotica and Give Me Pink come with this network. It also has Fist Flush too but the content is very limited, I found some way back in 2008-2009.
- Navigation is okay, seems better than it is at first, gets worse, but then improves, will explain in BL.
- Download speeds are excellent (85% of max).
- Sapphic Erotica is arguably the greatest lesbian site in internet porn history.
- Very high quality, dating back to the 2007 content, they have 1080p option on the videos and have 4K option dating back to September 2015.
- Updates roughly 10 times per month.
- If your porn interest is in just women, solo and lesbian scenes, this is the network for you, there are 0 scenes with men.
- The archives include some of the most explicit masturbation (Give Me Pink) of the Euro top models from 2005-2010.
Cons:
- Two problems in one con. On the model list, they are still using Sapphic Erotica's aliases for the Sapphic Erotica scenes. If you weren't around when Euro porn was the top porn, you might not be familiar with this and the countless debates we used to go through with webmasters over the confusion of aliases. And they use one name for multiple models, even when you use the "search" but the search goes around the aliases! Meaning if you search for Eve Angel, her scenes listed as Daphne (Sapphic Erotica) also show up.
- Fist Flush has very little content on here. It's not a site I'm familiar with so I don't know how much there should be.
- One of the advertising "index" pages I was on said you get 7 sites with Sapphic Erotica but you don't, you get 2 with Sapphic Erotica.
Bottom Line:
I'll start with why I took 10 points off the score. When I was checking out Sapphix, it said 7 sites are included with a membership to Sapphic Erotica and one of those sites was In Focus Girls, a site Sapphic Erotica owned. Once I signed up, there's really only two sites on Sapphix. It also only officially lists 3 but one is Fist Flush, I've only found a handful of scenes from it (really didn't intend that one). This is combined with the network Perfect Gonzo, that was supposed to have Give Me Pink on it. When I joined Perfect Gonzo, they told me it was originally supposed to be on Perfect Gonzo but was now on Sapphix. This is all too typical of mid to late 2000s Euro porn.
But the Sapphix site redeems itself. It does "only" include Sapphic Erotica and Give Me Pink but those are two of the top 10 sites of the 2005-2010 era (Euro boom) AND they're updating. I probably should review those sites separately since they are very large sites with big followings and might in the future but for now, I'm sticking to the network.
I had to dig deep into the archive of my reviews to find how I scored these sites in the past. I gave Sapphic Erotica a 94 in 2007 and Give Me Pink an 88 in 2008.
Sapphic Erotica was and still is the premier lesbian site, TBP's current score on it is 95. And they've been around since 2003. They were the first lesbian site that I know of that had "tribbing" or scissoring. They had deep kissing between the models, models getting so turned on even with their panties on that you could see a wet spot forming on their panties. But they did go mainstream at some point (2010, maybe?) and started focusing on quantity over quality. The newer content (2014-15 and forward is more like the older content).
Give Me Pink was at one time part of a group of sites (not a network) owned by one company that focused on extremely high quality, for the time (1080p in 2007) and they had every known, great, top-tier Euro model on their site with a catch. It was as close to "hardcore" masturbation as you could get. Close-ups throughout the masturbation. Old friend and PU member Denner once asked, "Is it a porn site or a site about gynecology?" It wasn't for everyone but it was for me. I had watched these models tease and "gently" masturbate for years. I wanted to see more and Give Me Pink did that. Then, it and its sister sites, stopped updating. Sister sites included All Internal and Ass Traffic. Those like me then found In the Crack and I've even wondered in, In the Crack reviews, if the Give Me Pink producers were the producers at ITC. That's a compliment.
What you get here is Sapphic Erotica and Give Me Pink, including their entire archives. You also get 10 new scenes a month and the quality shows with 1080p videos dating back to 2007, 4K dating back to 2015.
It's really impressive but there's that alias problem which really isn't a problem unless you want to use the model list and not the search box.
If you're into the more extreme insertions, Give Me Pink was one of the first sites I knew of that did it. Including some models using a smaller than average baseball bat. They also include photo sets in downloadable zips.
There's a chance that my excitement over this combination won't be as exciting to others. That 2005-2010 era of porn was my favorite and while they have new content, I'm mostly focused on that era.
Their overall content includes 2237 movies. The Sapphic scenes average 30-40 minutes, the Give Me Pink scenes average 30-50 minutes. They do some "strange" things in the classic Give Me Pink scenes including but not limited to, squirting milk out of their butthole. The newer Give Me Pink scenes aren't near as long (10-30 minutes).
I would say anyone who is into the kinkier masturbation would like Give Me Pink, especially if you were into any of the Euro models from the time period I mentioned. Anyone who likes lesbian porn should love Sapphic Erotica. They at least have returned to their more classic style of shooting. I watched a scene earlier between two women I'm not familiar with, Talia Mint (sounds familiar to me) and Vanna Bardot, full scene of fully dressed to kissing, undressing each other, lots of touching that gets rougher and where these scenes stand out just like they did in their heyday, after both orgasm, they're still laying there together, naked, kissing and lightly touching each other. There's a high level of eroticism in these scenes. Overall, I would recommend it to anyone who likes In the Crack and anyone who likes lesbian porn that doesn't come off as too scripted. Would also recommend it to any women who are wondering if they're bi-curious, pretty sure the tagline to women viewers on Sapphic's scenes was, "If you weren't bi-curious, you will be soon." Meaning it's also female-friendly porn. I'm just learning about the genre so bare with me. Very good price from TBP/PU too. I used to pay $29.95 for each of these sites.
I'm taking the walk of shame for the "girlfriend's best friend". Many years ago, I've told it before but it was a long time ago back when we talked about our screennames. Being from LA, I mostly knew the typical California girl (before I was 20), blonde hair, tan from sunbathing, cute, perky but they had so much attention from guys that it would take an act of congress just to squeeze a boob. My girlfriend's best friend wasn't American. She lived next door to her but had been out of the country for the summer to visit family. The first time we met, I didn't say it but felt "exotics4me". She had a medium (natural) complexion, dark hair, long dark eyelashes and deep green eyes. I'm guessing the average man would have preferred my girlfriend. But she brought more than the exotic look. She was bold, she made the first move on me with her best friend in the next room. We got caught in the act but would you believe, it didn't hurt their friendship even though I dated the "best friend" for 2 years? The girlfriend even said to me, "I saw how you looked at her. It's not how you look at me."
Since then, I don't pick women by race or ethnicity but you can bet if there's an exotic woman in my eyesight, I've either already flirted with her or I'm getting ready to!
The cleaning lady one still makes me laugh too. If I hired a cleaning lady and she started trying to be seductive, I would tell her to wait until after she's finished cleaning.
This is one of those "you have to be kidding" ones. I've never received a traffic ticket. Not even a parking ticket and I attended 3 different universities. I will add there that one of the schools was very well-known for giving parking tickets. When I told one of the professors that I hadn't ever received a ticket at the school. He said, "Do you check your student mailbox at the campus post office?" I replied, "There's a post office on campus?" But I would think those would have come up when I graduated.
And I think the "catch masturbating" might not be specific enough. I used to "let" girlfriends, wives, catch me and they would do the same, especially in the shower. Thank goodness for porn or else I would wonder what the big deal is with owning a shower head with massager.
I voted for nurse because the nurse uniforms they use in porn aren't realistic at all.
Police are very realistic.
Office are very realistic.
Teachers are very realistic.
Maid? Never had a maid. I thought those were just for fantasies! But to be honest, I might be upset if I paid a maid to clean and she showed up trying to seduce me.
Uh-oh, what happened at FTV? My account ran out 3 months ago, I had just setup to get their year-long special and in my head at least, I was convinced if they're still shooting like they always did that I was seriously considering making them my first 100. I used to talk to their webmaster but haven't heard from in awhile.
The good part with the psychologist dating, I met her, as a mentor to her. She was 18 when I first met her, I was 23-24. I typically have to find something odd to have in common with women since so few understand my past and at least in America, some are intimidated or timid about my past (prior to psychology, growing up around gangs in Los Angeles, lots of deaths including brother and more than 20 friends.) If I get the chance this weekend, I'll post a thread about fetishes. Khan used to always ask me to do those Q&A with a member and/or to open up more about myself. I used to talk to him a lot in emails and he always believed members would open up more if one of the longtime members started it. Now, I'm at the point in my life that I don't worry too much about who might see it or might realize who I am.
Hey RA, I responded once but the post monster ate it, so if a double reply shows up, you'll know why.
The anal masturbation on here is different than what I'm used to. A couple of the models go all out with a dildo, anally. Including one that puts a knee on each arm of the chair with her butt facing the camera. The best, to me, of the scenes with anal is one of Caprice's. She has four scenes on here, 3 include some kind of anal. The best one, she slowly fingers her butt with one finger, great eye contact in it, I'm not used to seeing what I would call "erotic anal fingering" but she pulls it off. Overall, about 20% of the scenes have anal in them. Abella Danger has a scene on here and as expected she goes all out with the dildo, anally. Probably half of the "anal" scenes are models masturbating with a butt plug in. I think the other two of Caprice are butt plug scenes. The most "extreme" they go is a couple of those real squirt scenes. By real squirt, I mean the model gets very wet and creamy and a little of it squirts out maybe 6 inches.
I didn't think too much about the price, my fetishes are driving my site joins these days. I was dating a female psychologist who I've known for 20 years. She says my fetishes are the oddest she's ever seen because "They're so normal". We have a lot of talks about how we develop our fetishes and she thinks it's funny that my fetishes are what she calls, "kind of cute, kind of sweet, kind of perverted". The public nudity one for example, my second wife was a natural exhibitionist. She was from South America. I couldn't keep her clothes on her. It did nothing for me. If anything, it made me frustrated. The "natural" part is what matters. She believed when at our house, in our backyard (fenced), in the small pool, she should be naked. Didn't matter if company came by. She would walk by them naked and get a towel to put around her. But she never was into "risky" which is where my public nudity fetish starts. I think a fetish thread would be good in the forum. I'm sure we have had some but at least with me, it would explain my choices in current sites.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
