Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A premier old/young site that’s been around as long as I’ve been reviewing porn.
- The site is large (see cons) and currently is sitting on scene 799.
- Navigation is clear and straightforward but it could be improved (see cons)
- Newest 125 or so scenes have 4K download option (see bottom line for full quality details).
- Downloadable photo sets and screenshots.
- Download speeds are good at 80% of my max.
- Pretty and young female models.
Cons:
- It drives my OCD crazy when there aren’t dates on the scenes. There are none here but based on the last TBP review, it looks like they’ve added nearly 20 scenes in 2021, maybe 2 updates per month?
- The site has everything it needs in navigation but the way the scenes are laid out can make it a little frustrating. I will explain further in the Bottom Line.
Bottom Line:
I actually remember this site from my very first year on Porn Users. I think it was one of the only old/young sites back then. It’s hard to believe but I was in my 20s when I started reviewing on Porn Users. I am now about to hit 42. Back then, I had no interest in watching a bunch of old guys have sex with 18-24 year old women. There is more to this niche than meets the eye. Do the Transformers owe me royalty for that? What you have here is the tale of Beauty and the Beast meets porn. Very attractive young women having sex with this old guys that look like they are probably someone’s grandfather. One of the things I’ve noticed that Oldje advertises is Real Swallows and Kisses. There’s the more than meets the eye. I don’t think a porn site is pulling off anything special to talk a young woman into having sex with an older man for a paycheck. But, these scenes have a lot of touching, kissing and shows of affection and lust. You can buy lust. It’s not as easy to buy affection. The one time I joined this site before this time, I was impressed by the chemistry between the young women and older men.
To my surprise and let me add happiness, Oldje doesn’t stray from older man/younger woman. I’m still not too open to the younger men/older women niche. At least not on this big of an age difference. I don’t think I would enjoy watching an 18 year old guy have sex with a 67 year old woman. I’m reviewing porn, doesn’t that tell you I can be shallow?
My complaint about the layout should be furthered a little. They have the newest scene showing when you sign in and below it is one that isn’t numbered and says, “special”. That’s what happens when you number your scenes. That’s 799, then “special” scene just below it. Below special scene is scene 798. It may be OCD at work. I don’t know why those special scenes are in-between the numbered scenes. I don’t know if those are numbered elsewhere on the site or if they are bonus scenes. You can download them. Clicking the model’s name doesn’t help. It opens the models scenes up but no numbers on those. You all are starting to realize why I’ve been married 3 times.
Don’t let that take away from what is a very entertaining site in this niche. They have Gina Gershon in a gangbang with older men. I think you have to put yourself in the older men’s mindset, I’m going straight to hell for this, you know those older guys are looking at each other and saying, “I finally have a story to tell my adult grandchildren.” It does make it entertaining. These are not “stunt cocks”, this is one of the greatest moments of these men’s lives. It’s a fun site. Even if I’m not that into the older/younger niche. I can appreciate it more now than 14 years ago.
They also have very good quality. The newer scenes have 4K, 1080, 720 and 540 in the download options. There are downloadable photo sets and downloadable screenshots. It’s becoming pretty common to just accept that if we at least get pictures we should be happy. These pictures are 2000 long end. I’ve said it before, that’s better than no pictures. On the videos, I find the 720p plenty clear and crisp enough to download those. I’m go back into their older scenes, back when some of these young women were starting kindergarten. If the older guys performances don’t impress you, this will, every scene, unless I missed one, has at least 720p download. I don’t think you can ask for more than that from a site that has been around this long.
I didn’t list this as a con since it’s becoming so common. The site is a free-scroll site. Scroll, let more scenes load, scroll, let more scenes load. I know a few members have talked about not liking that. I don’t either but it’s not that bad.
If you’re into older and younger porn you definitely should check this site out and it comes with a couple other sites. They also have an Oldje threesome site. The tags seem to work well on this site. There’s not a lot to complain about. Unless you’re just turned off by the niche itself. There are threesomes on here with the old guy taking care of two younger women. I think porn like this is a nice break from stunt cocks, the same nearly violent hardcore scenes that we’re seeing in mainstream porn today. Much more impressed than I would have been when I was 28.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- They fooled me right off the bat, it’s one older guy with two young, hot women. I was expecting two old guys with one woman.
- Not a huge site but how many of us really expect to see an older guy satisfying two young women? There are 107 scenes and 159 female models.
- There are some really pretty models on this site. I don’t know these models but I’m impressed with them.
- Every video has 1080p, 720p and 540p downloads. No 4K.
- Download speeds are very good (80-85% of my max)
- Very simple site that shows why many sites too complicated. Navigation isn’t a problem at all.
Cons:
- If you like Oldje and want to see what this site is about, you have to join it separately and pay again.
- I’m guessing that some will say it’s too basic of a site. The pictures just look like screenshots to me.
- No dates on the scenes and I don’t know if it’s updating.
Bottom Line:
The scene that shows up first when I sign in was worth the membership. I don’t know who the model is. Her name is listed as Samantha Sparkle and she’s 19, from Hungary. She has all the qualities of a star. She’s also on the regular Oldje site. She’s one of those models that had the same initial response from me when I first saw Eve Angel or Anetta Keys. She not too curvy and built but she’s not too thin either. She has pretty hair, eyes and she has that classic female body. The other woman in the scene is Amy Douxxx. I’m not really into blondes but she’s attractive. The guy, my apoligies to him if I get this wrong. He looks at least 75. I’m being kind. He looks like my 86 year old uncle. I do believe he is very advanced in age. He doesn’t really do a lot. The women take turns riding on him. If that is turn-off to you, you won’t like this site. I think for me, my favorite niche is solo. I like to see the woman in action, moving her body and with these older guys not being able to do a lot, it lets the women really show what they can do. I don’t think I ever realized that’s why I don’t like most newer, mainstream hardcore. The guy takes up half the spotlight. These old guys don’t care about the spotlight. They have to beautiful, young, naked women and that’s all the spotlight they need.
The site isn’t big and I have not seen a new update posted. I don’t know if it’s updating. It does have 107 scenes on it. If you find a way to really enjoy this type of porn like I have, that’s 107 scenes that you’re going to want. Even the settings are realistic. It looks like the old guy’s house. It’s going to make me look further into this older/ younger niche. I’m starting to either understand what they’re going for or my imagination is working too well.
Some of the missing features on this site is there are tags but those tags are limited and you can only see the tags by going to a scene. There’s not a tab for tags like on Oldje. That, to me, can be an advantage. You don’t really need a tag box. It’s an older guy having sex with two hot, younger women. That lowers the importance of the navigation. The women do interact with each other too. It’s kind of like a lesbian friends stumbled up on an older man who found his bottle of Viagra. You get three download options on the videos. All the videos have 1080, 720, 540. It has pictures but it’s not setup like the other Oldje site. You can download those. You just have to scroll to the bottom of the page to find the download link to the pictures.
I’m going to mention they have some scenes that seem to be compilations of some sort. That’s just going to lead me right into saying I believe they should combine this site with the regular Oldje site. That’s what the compilations look like. It looks like they’ve taken the best segments from Oldje and made those into a compilation to put on this site. I believe I’ve realized the two women with the one older guy are there just as much to occupy each other. Check the models and see if you find any like I did that made it worth joining despite it being a smaller site. I do believe porn has flipped the script on the older/younger by having younger men with older women. I know of at least 10 sites that have something like, “Mom teaches sex” in the title. That makes these older men with younger women scenes more unique. It’s not as good overall as Oldje but it’s a nice addition.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It’s headlined by Oldje which I have separate review for. These are the bonus sites and it’s called the Sensual Girl Network.
- You get a mixture of quite a few niches on this network.
- I’m going to not include much about Oldje, one of the bonus sites, Class Nudes, is still updating too.
- Video quality overall is good to very good and Oldje even has 4K (will detail in the bottom line)
- Download speeds are good (80% of max).
- Navigation is really good considering especially they have integrated four sites into one under the Sensual Girl Network name and you can jump from to another. Which should be standard these days but a lot of networks don’t see it that way. This one does.
- If you’re a picture collector you’re in for a treat with the Class Nudes site.
Cons:
- Two of the sites are not updating but the videos on those have at least 720p option. And the niches those cover are not that common.
- The videos on Class Nudes are not even worth looking at. (I will explain below)
Bottom Line:
This is very interesting to me. Oldje is the headlining site and I gave it a 93. I’m going to try and review just the other sites on the Sensual Girl Network in this review. But you do get Oldje with it but you don’t get Oldje 3-Some. If they added that to this I would be upper 90s on it.
The three other sites are Class Nudes, Class 3-somes and Class Blowjobs. Class Nudes is still updating. It’s kind of like the artsy sites. The videos are very tame. The newer videos are not even videos. Those are video of the pictures. Some of the older ones are a little more involved videos but still tame. What makes that interesting is most of these models also appear in scenes on Oldje. I think that’s the best part of Class Nudes. You can see these women in more glamorous type pictures then watch their hardcore scene with an older guy. I have wondered about the professionals or amateurs part. On Class Nudes there are quite a few pro models from the past especially. I noticed Black Angelica, Nataly Von, one of my all-time favorites, she gets my vote for best eyes in porn, Aleska Diamond. It may just be that I don’t know a lot of the newer models. I’ve told it before, I’ve had trouble keeping up with the newer models.
You can download the photo sets which are very good. The high resolution download option has photos that are 3500 long end. They’re professional level photosets, usually pretty scenery. There are a total of 439 photosets as of 9/25/21 and like I said there are videos but there’s no way I’m going to click them all to see how many are just videos of pictures and how many are just tame videos. I haven’t seen any of the videos with much explicitness. That’s why I like that most of these models have hardcore scenes on Oldje which comes with the network. When I talked about the good navigation. If you click on a model’s photo set on Class Nudes and she has a video on Oldje, it shows up for you to click and go right to it.
The other two sites included are not updating. They are worth checking out. The Class 3-Some is not older/younger. It’s mostly two women with one man and the women are very attractive. I may be biased. Some of my favorite models from 8-10 years ago were nearly all European and I think all of these models are European. I liked that European look from around 2008-2013. It has 80 scenes on it and that includes a video that maxes out at 720p download, which is acceptable to me and my preferred video resolution. The scenes also come with a photoset you can download with those being 4000 long end. This was once a seriously premium website. I would go far as saying this network is doing what I think all networks should be like.
The other site is Class Blowjob. This one has 60 scenes on it and this is not your average blowjob site. There is rimming, swallowing and beginners. Then they tried the humor with “dong lifter”. Leave the humor to me. The models are very pretty. Some of the videos have 540, 720 and 1080. Some have 270, 540 and 720. All of them have at least 720p. These sites add to what I said was the headlining site Oldje. They’re giving you a little different genre here with these extra sites. I like how Class Nudes ties in with Oldje. Then, the blowjob and Class 3-Somes give you less of the old/young of Oldje if you get tired of watching an old guy having fun. I expected Oldje to be good but will say the network it comes with is not real big and that’s what makes it good. It’s high quality porn too. I rated it just a little over Oldje. You all know I’m bad about scoring a single site from a network higher than I score a network because to me, a lot of networks take away from the headlining site. This one doesn’t. It adds more to the headlining site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The models are beautiful and varied in body type, race and most seem kinky.
- More anal than I am used to seeing on a lesbian site, of the 153 scenes, 91 are tagged as having anal but I think the number may be higher than that.
- The scenes are long (most are over 30 minutes) and you get to see all sides of each woman.
- The tags say 65 of the scenes feature “scissoring” or tribbing, again, that number looks a little low. (See bottom line)
- My download speeds are very good at 80-85% of my max.
- Useful, navigation tricks including a download scene button on the scene preview or main page, you can also favorite scenes which are stored in your favorites.
- Very little clutter, clean lines, only one ad at the bottom and nice layout.
- High quality on videos.
Cons:
- It’s not updating enough. It updates once per month and isn’t that big of a site as it is with 153 scenes.
- Tries to get too cute with some of the scenes like the inflatable pool filled with plastic balls. They have multiple scenes using the inflatable pool.
Bottom Line:
Lesbian porn is a genre I like quite a bit and there are specific parts I prefer in it. My favorites are tribadism, which porn has decided is either called scissoring or tribbing. It is the act of rubbing the clits together or even the thighs. I am not a huge fan of anal in male/female scenes but I do like it in lesbian scenes and even solo scenes, though there are no solo scenes on this site. Something that could be seen as a con to some is the use of toys and strapons. I don’t mind either in lesbian scenes. There’s something about my imagination thinking that means they are thinking about a man (me) being there with them.
This is more along the lines of hardcore lesbian porn. Even if the tags are right more than half of the scenes have anal in them. This is not like the lesbian scenes you see on a lot of the younger/teen sites. This is more involved. Something I regularly admit is I like different body types. Lesbian porn is one of the best genres, for me, to see the “chubbier” models and there are some on this site. I’m not even for sure why I like the chubbier lesbians. You also have the more “perfect” type models like Alexis Tae and Ember Snow. There are a couple of these scenes that top my list as the most hardcore lesbian scenes I’ve seen. The Alexis Tae with Adira Allure scene titled, “Hardcore Interracial Lesbians” is very intense. I’m surprised they stopped filming. I believe they could have made a 2-3 hour scene with just those two in it. Gia Derza and Scarlit Scandal also have an intense scene titled, “Extreme Desire” that makes me look at lesbian porn differently than what I’m used to from European studios. Those aren’t even the best scenes on the site either. I don’t know if maybe one of the model’s changed her name. The models listed are Karlee Gray and Kuleana, the scene is titled, “Violent Starr’s 1st Lesbian Anal”. It’s nearly 40 minutes long and I would be surprised if those two are not real life lovers. There also is one with the forever gorgeous Sophia Leone with Eliza Ibarra that shows this site also has the near perfect 10 models in some of the scenes.
I do question if the tags are right. Nearly every scene I’ve watched has “scissoring” but only 65 are tagged that way out of 153. Who is complaining? The flip side of things I like in lesbian porn are things I don’t like and this site avoids those. I don’t really like the lesbian scenes with more than 2 women in them. There’s too much going on when there are more than 2. Women already have two boobs, a butt and a pussy to look at, plus I look at the face and hair. I’m going to need more eyes if you put more than 2 women. That’s my way of saying there are not enough camera angles when you have too many women in a scene having lesbian sex.
The biggest complaint I have is they only have 153 scenes and are only updating once per month. In my many years of reviewing, I’ve said it several times, the best compliment I can give a site is for my biggest complaint to be they need more content. I wouldn’t feel that way if the content wasn’t good.
The technical quality on the videos keeps up with the looks and performances of the models. The newer videos have 4K download option. The oldest video has 1080p, 720p, 540p and the smaller mobile versions too. The picture sets are downloadable too. The pictures could have a higher resolution for my taste in photos but at least they have those. Speaking of the oldest video, it’s another one worth mentioning. It is Abella Danger and Chanell Heart in a scene titled, “Big Booty Interracial Anal”. It’s nearly 40 minutes and features Abella being as kinky as I’ve seen her with multiple finger anal fingering of Chanell. There really are 5-10 scenes on here that are worth joining just for those scenes.
They do explore other fetishes in a few scenes including pissing, squirting and you have some older women with younger women scenes too. This is one of those sites that would be perfect if it had weekly updates (minimum). This, from the real-life lesbians I know, is more like what lesbian sex really is like compared to the heavily romantic lesbian porn most sites have on them.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Interracial, high-quality porn, that could use a new casting director.
- Good sized site with 266 scenes but it’s only updating once per month.
- The video quality is very good and there’s not a lot of drop in quality in the older scenes.
- Download speeds are good (80% of my max).
- Easy site to join and cancel, good sorting features but those can be confusing (see bottom line).
- If you like hardcore with as much story as “Where the Wild Things Are” this is a good site.
Cons:
- Jax Slayher, easily the most annoying male talent in porn today. I don’t get that. I don’t think anyone pays to look at the back of someone’s hand. I will try to see if the navigation will tell me how many scenes he’s in. He completely ruins the scenes.
- The site is big enough to overcome the small amount of updates but it doesn’t have a lot of personality to the site.
Bottom Line:
(uploaded wrongly as All Black X, corrected and fixed both)
This is another of the X Empire sites. It’s not a bad site at all. I do have an admitted problem with the male talent named Jax Slayher. The rest of the guys on this site do their jobs well. This Jax Slayher guy, he is this generation’s Lee Stone, not with a broken dick. Stone liked to step on the model’s face. Slayher likes to cover the faces with his hand. I don’t know if he’s uncoordinated and needs to balance. Look at the model list, he is in 23 scenes so you can subtract those from the 266. The worst part is, they seem to cast him with the female models I really like, like Ember Snow. I do believe it’s because most of the scenes are cookie-cutter. I don’t think they even think about the casting. They probably flip a coin or maybe they have literal pissing contests to see who gets to be in the scenes with the prettiest models.
The cookie-cutter concept to these scenes makes it where the big selling point is the female model. I said it before and will always believe this, the most important part of a porn scene that’s not a fetish, is whether you’re attracted to the model. That can overcome a lot. The scenes follow a similar script. The scenes are almost all in the same house or a house that looks the same. They have a couch that appears in more scenes than any of the models. I don’t know if I need to explain the script. But here goes: Starts out with some touching, a little kissing, and by 2:30 she’s sucking his dick. She will spend 4-6 minutes gagging on the guy’s dick. It just skips him giving her oral. And jumps to somehow, anal with fingers in the pussy by the 8 minute mark. The anal lasts for 22 more minutes and the scene is over. Outside of the fingers in the pussy, he didn’t even have pussy sex with her. I’m trying to make a point. If you’re going to make cookie-cutter porn at least use every part. What if a person doesn’t like anal? It’s not an anal site. It wouldn’t hurt for 4-5 minutes of that anal sex to be pussy sex. This is what I call clinical porn. Since someone once asked what I meant by clinical, the definition for it is, “Efficient and unemotional, coldly detached.” Perfect explanation for what some of these scenes are. The scenes are recorded to get the scenes over so they can record another. There’s no feeling of connection. It’s not all of the scenes but all of the scenes do follow a script. If the first sex is pussy sex, there’s not going to be anal. They have taken the cookie-cutter approach and made it even more narrow.
It’s a shame because the technical quality is so high. The newer scenes have from 160p to 4K download options. The oldest scenes have from 160p to 1080p download options.
The photo set are good enough at 2000 long end with downloadable zips and a focus on the clothed model for the first 30-50 pictures. That’s why I say it’s a shame to just zoom through the scenes.
The navigation is very good but as mentioned it can be confusing. The reason is they have a section called “Partner Scenes”. These are sites that they have licensed content from other sites that Gamma is partnered with including Team Skeet, Joymii and SexArt to name a few. The problem with that is most of those sites have better production in their scenes. The results of the category searches include the partner scenes.
I don’t think that would be as big of deal if I could figure where the rest of the scenes are that these sites are supposed to have on them. This site says it has 511 scenes. When I click on it, it has 266. All their sites are like that. There’s plenty to work on here. You get some of the top female models in the world. Have very good technical quality. Is it that hard to count the scenes? Or hire someone to say, “You know what, the last 200 scenes we filmed followed the exact pattern.” This network as a whole is good but it wears on you to the point that when you’re nearing the end of your subscription you’re glad.
The attractive women for the win again. That’s your selling point here. Check the model list before joining and make sure there are models you like and hope they’re not in a scene with Jax Slayher.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- An attempt to create hardcore porn that has some story and is not too hardcore. It's multitasking porn.
- Hit or miss from scene to scene but the hits are good enough to make it a pro.
- Some scenes are as long as 45 minutes and there is variety in the settings.
- Probably could be a con too, updating twice per month. Large enough site in a relatively rare niche to offset the slower update schedule.
- Download speeds are good to very good at 85% of my max.
- Easy navigation including a feature I don’t see very often. You can download the scene without clicking on it. There is a download in the upper left hand corner of the scene preview with download options that show up when you hover over it.
- Everything is professional from the models, to the production values, to the site design
- Good range of different model types (race, body type, etc)
Cons:
- Some of the scenes try way too hard to not be hardcore. Bordering on mushiness. That’s where the miss in the hit or miss comes from.
- The numbers of scenes they show the site having are not the same as when you get inside. This one shows 715 but once you click on the site there are only 373.
Bottom Line:
This is what happens when you try to do something creative with a gonzo premise. You make the male and female performers have to show their acting ability. The problem with that on this site is there is a reliance on a small group of male performers, who are all well-known professionals with the females changing from scene to scene. Some examples of this include: Mia Malkova has the most scenes of any female on this site with 12. The second most for females is a tie between Valentina Nappi and Aidra Fox with 8 and fourth in Adriana Chechik with 7. The top four males are: Seth Gamble with 51 scenes, James Deen with 33 scenes, Danny Mountain with 27 scenes and Tyler Nixon with 25 scenes. Those four guys are in roughly 1/3 of the scenes. If the scenes didn’t rely on showing the guy as the story develops then it probably wouldn’t be as noticeable but you are getting in the area of overexposure and I’m not talking about nudity. Most of the females besides the 4 that I listed have 1-3 scenes. Since this style of porn is promoting chemistry or even love and passion between the actors and actresses, it does make it difficult to believe these guys are capable of loving 25-50 different women.
The site and scenes are mostly good, though. And it’s because of the female models. There are maybe 5 female models I didn’t find attractive but they are also models you likely know like the 4 listed above, Abella Danger, AJ Applegate, Jade Kush, Emily Willis and so on.
The disappointing part for me is the inconsistency from scene to scene. You watch a good scene then see another one that has a model you are interested in and watch it only to get poor performances. The best scenes I have watched are the ones without the overused models. Which does magnify the possible problem here. I get the feeling some of the actors and actresses are just not into the acting needed to pull these types of scenes off.
The amount of scenes is 373. Those all have videos and photos. There is a daily download limit of 300 GB. I am not even for sure the entire site has 300 GB of content on it. The video quality is very good. The most recent 135 scenes have 4K download option on the videos. Even if you go back to the oldest scenes those have 1080p. The oldest scenes seem to have some kind of theme/story tied directly to each scene. The preview for the scenes shows a title similar to a mainstream movie advertising poster, complete with “featuring (model’s name)”. There really isn’t much to dislike other than the requiring non-actors to be actors. The photos are good and could be even better. These photo sets are large (200+ photos) and the female model is the focus of the photo set, usually fully clothed for the first 15 photos, then teasing 30-50 photos in. The resolution is the only thing holding those back at around 2000 on the long end.
It’s a good site that I believe could be better if they mixed up the male usage or relied less on acting ability if they can’t find more males. It’s worth checking out if you like hardcore that isn’t “porn hardcore”.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Maybe a different take on Interracial gangbangs than we’re used to.
- Five categories to separate the different types of gangbangs, that’s where the different take comes in for me.
- Not a lot of video download options but all the videos have 540, 720 and 1080 resolution downloads. No 4K but I don’t mind that.
- Downloadable photosets that are better than expected.
- Download speeds are good (75-80% of my max).
- From what I can tell it’s updating about twice per month.
Cons:
- That update schedule may not be right. I am basing the number of scenes they have compared to the last TBP review. They have averaged 2 per month.
- One of the most barebones, basic sites I’ve ever seen and it’s not a network even though network is in the name.
- It’s not all gangbangs either.
Bottom Line:
This is one of those sites that you join when you’re tired of Dogfart. It’s a little different than what you probably expect. It was for me at least. Lets go into the very basic site design. The tabs they have are “videos” which also serves as a dropdown menu to pick the category you want and “models” that’s it. They do have tags on the scenes that you can click and find other scenes with the same tag. The download options on the videos are good. I am at the point that I’m not interested in 4K videos. I just mention it in my reviews if a site has 4K. This one offers 540p, 720p and 1080p on all their videos. There are 242 scenes, those each have a video and photoset. I haven’t hit a download limit.
The categories add a lot to the review, I think. The categories are “Matures”, “Teens”, “Castings”, “Cuckolds” and “Grannies”. I was expecting more gangbangs. The tags don’t exactly help me out as much as I would like. They have a gangbangs tag and a group-sex tag. There are 28 group or gangbangs. I think the big selling point here is the mature and granny scenes. They have around 80 of the mature interracial and around 40 of the granny interracial. The cuckold category makes me wonder about the group-sex tag. It’s a supposed to be husband or boyfriend with his girlfriend or wife and a black guy. That’s group-sex to me. But those are not tagged as group-sex. If you’re into cuckold porn this is some very realistic-looking cuckolding. I don’t want to say it goes into bisexual men but the husband/boyfriend does often give the wife oral while the black guy is having anal sex with her. You know the old saying about the greasy slit it only an inch from the asshole. This is very kinky for those into kinky. There are parts where the husband’s tongue touches the black guy’s dick and the husband licks the cum up and then shares it with the wife. I think they may be missing a possible interested audience in those who like bisexual men. I know it’s not full bisexual sex between the men but you’re going to get really close in these cuckold scenes. There is no bisexual tag. I don’t know if cuckolding automatically assumes bisexual. Those scenes if you’re into that are very believable.
On the updates, the newest scene was released in August of this year. The one before that was in May of this year. The TBP review and facts update list the scenes as 218 in November 2019. They have added 24 in the last 22 months, so it’s more like one new one per month. I do think the rarity of these types of scenes and overall size of the site makes up for it. I haven’t seen porn like this. That’s mostly the cuckolding that I’m talking about. Where it is different than most interracial gangbang sites is the gangbang and group sex often has one or two black guys and one or two white guys in it too. It doesn’t just go with only black guys in those. I do not know any of these models. The models, for the most part, (not the grannies) are attractive enough. These look like amateur models but a few of the names make me think I’ve heard of them like Alex Black. She looks familiar. It’s definitely different than the typical interracial site. What I will also point out is something several reviewers have talked about. The bad part about having group or gangbangs is it takes away from the one on one scenes. I do think that’s a slight problem on this site. Besides the gangbangs and group-sex, those cuckolding scenes, that’s quite a bit of kinkiness. When you switch it back to one on one you lose the kinkiness.
To me that is going to be the selling point or audience this should be aimed at. Those into kinkiness and cuckolding, gangbangs and group-sex. Of course, if you’re into grannies then you can add those too. I guess that’s kinky too. It’s not for me. It’s a good site with very good technical quality. The simplicity of the site will make it look a little drab but it’s also easy to use and there’s not a lot obstructing your views of the previews. It’s a site that surprised me.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Bondage, whips, cuffs and nearly every kink you can think of with a porn scene to boot.
- Models I’m not familiar with but most are attractive. A total of 288 females.
- They are updating, it looks like once a month and there are 450 scenes.
- No 4K but I don’t consider that a con, 1080p, 720p and 540p downloadable videos.
- Photo set zip download is available.
- Download speeds are good but I did find a little inconsistency at times, going to say I averaged 70% of my max.
- Lots of tags and you’re going to need them. They have things on here I’ve never heard of.
Cons:
- This is a tough con to list since I assume anyone that joins the site knows what to expect. Some scenes are really rough. I don’t see anything that makes me think negatively.
- I didn’t find some of the models attractive. I do believe this is authentic BDSM, which would make me think there are only certain models willing to do it.
Bottom Line:
You know you’ve entered into a whole other world of porn when the first scene you watch has all of these in it: Whipping, spanking, water torture, hot candle wax, a pillory and suspension cables. There’s a porn scene in there somewhere. Those that know me, know that I’m not hugely into harsh or violent porn. I would say some of this goes a little further than I like. Nearly every scene has a tag for “crying”. I also know crying doesn’t always show pain. I believe this site gives a good representation of BDSM porn. The porn really does kind of just sneak up on you. I didn’t want to list this as a con. It could be something I would regret. A lot of the scenes didn’t seem long enough. Most are under 30 minutes which is to me how long a porn scene should last or at least close to 20-30 minutes just for the sex. I could regret that. Some of these scenes do look painful. I thought the best part of the scenes was it looks like these women enjoy BDSM.
The most impressive part is the amount of tags. I’m going to share a few since I had to watch the scene to find out what it was. I’m going to go from the softer side to the I have no idea what that is side. Softer: Catsuit, kissing, masturbation, see, this is regular porn. Even the middle ground: Anal, rimming, blowjob, strap-on, cum in mouth, even cum-eating, now for the rougher side: Crotch rope, nipple clamps, needles, hot wax, yokes. I think they are calling what I call a pillory a “yoke”. There’s the crying tag, the screaming and the slapping. The screaming don’t bother me since most porn models need to stop talking during the scenes. If they’re screaming they’re not talking. These are just some of the, “I have no idea what that is” tags. I’m focusing on these tags for a reason. I think when you join a site like this one, you take on the understanding you’re exploring areas you’ve never explored. Seeing things I’ve never heard of adds to the value of the site. Some don’t and I will list a few of those too. These are the ones I had no idea what it was: Monogloves, mummification, I realized I knew what that was, I just didn’t know that’s what it’s called. Here we go with one, pit-of-doom. I have you another one too, head-box. That made me think of the Brad Pitt movie Seven. That one looks like something straight out of a Saw movie. Rubber Gloves. That sounds self-explanatory, they don’t want to risk passing germs. Rubber gloves have a sharp parts on them for added pain … and pleasure. The ones I have no interest are Enema, Breath Play and Gagged. I really didn’t feel like any of it was that far out there. I just didn’t know the names.
I will say they have some of the most unique lit candle scenes. They have the lit candle right up to the woman’s pussy. I think talking about the different scenarios covered is more useful than saying they have sex eventually.
You get 450 of these scenes plus one new one per month. I wouldn’t compare this directly with Kink. This is more like those pay per scene sites where they really get into a fetish or fetishes. Some of these spanked and whipped and paddled women go from pale skin to dark red. It doesn’t seem to be over-excessive. I do think they play to the pain and crying a little more than they should. Who am I to say that, I don’t do most of this stuff. I want to say the acting is very good. The women typically give you a feeling of them being in fear of the master.
I do think if you join it just for the sex you’re probably not going to be that happy.
The videos are downloadable. I have read about a DL limit but I have not hit it. They don’t list the amount of the limit. The videos can be downloaded in 1080, 720, 540. The oldest scenes have 720p as the highest download option, which isn’t bad at all. They have photos and downloadable zips for those.
My personal favorite and it’s just because it can be related to a fetish I have. That is the “forest” tag. That’s public, even if it is in a forest. I liked all of those. I have seen a few other sites try the outdoor, bondage, those to me, go too close to forced. This site does it a little more tastefully and I do believe that’s an important part of a site like this. It’s definitely different than what you’re probably used to. I don’t feel like it pushes too much on comfort levels. I have those I listed as being not interested in but that’s just my own problem with those types of scenes. I’ve never understood the use of enemas in porn. Maybe before the porn scene but that’s what they’re going for here. This is like a BDSM network crammed into a site. I think your biggest complaints on this site will be subjective to each person. The length of the scenes is the only universal one. These scenes seem like they should be close to twice as long as they are. Good, different site that I recommend for those looking for something to break away from the mainstream.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
10-08-2110:14am (Update History) Reason: Uploaded Dark X review instead of All Black X, corrected now.
Pros:
- One of those rare “there are no porn stereotypes” sites.
- It’s a newer site, it’s not very big but the 44 scenes it has comes with with X Empire network and if you like, especially black women, there are some favorites on this site like Alexis Tae.
- Very good technical quality on videos and pictures.
- Only limited by the Gamma DL Limits which is 300 GB per day. I’m positive this entire site is not 300 GB.
- Download speeds are good (80% of my max).
- The good though sometimes frustrating Open Life Support, Gamma Cash, whatever they call it. They’re helpful if you chat with them.
Cons:
- The size of the site is disappointing. I keep waiting on someone to make a black female solo site. This one just has 44 scenes. See the next con and you’ll understand more.
- Only updating once per month. Just think, by the year 2027, at this pace, they will reach 100 videos.
- The rotating offers X Empire and all Gamma sites offer. One day they give you downloads and streaming, the next day sign up is for only streaming.
Bottom Line:
This is really my feeling about this site and I hope it comes across. This is a very dull, boring site. It’s going to get one of my lowest scores in a long time. Even the scenes with the really attractive women are dull. It’s because nothing ever changes from scene to scene. The people do and that’s it. There are a couple of lesbian scenes and a couple DPs. The rest of the scenes are of a professional male model and a professional female model going through the motions. I haven’t felt that as much with the other sites on this network. There probably is some disappointment for me too in the fact that one of my all-time favorite black female models is on here but she looks worse than I’ve ever seen her, Misty Stone. She’s been around for 15 years probably. I’m not being disrespectful. She just doesn’t really look like herself and surely there’s not another black, curly-headed, Misty Stone. I even wonder if anyone else has this same problem with this one male actor. Jax Slayher. That guy could put a hyper kid to sleep just by looking at them. He has no personality, he just reminds me of everything that is wrong with porn. He’s in a lot of scenes on this network. I have had others that I don’t particularly care for like James Deen and after Rocco’s change, didn’t like him. Somebody do something with these sites. Make some sites for women that focus on the male so these little ego men can get their egos stroked and so the women can be the focus of these sites like this one. I guess it’s why I said I keep waiting on a black female solo site. Prince Yahshua is not annoying. I could do without him but he doesn’t detract from the scene like Jax Slayher does.
The site is small with 44 scenes and only 1 update coming per month. The good new is, if you find content you like on this site, all 44 scenes have 160p, 240, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. They have you covered from the smallest I have ever heard to the biggest you’ll find unless you find one of those 6K or 8K sites. That will always be one of those situations where the poor performances stand out even more. They put this much money into the site. Have all those high quality videos and the female models are most of the top black female models I know of. The pictures, while only around 2000 on the long end, are downloadable and have over 300 photos in some of them. You can see the potential this site would have as just a solo site.
The site’s navigation is very easy thanks to only 44 scenes. Even the network itself has very good navigation. You can switch from site to site without having to sign in to each site even though the sites are clearly different sites. That and the pretty models are the parts saving this site from completely bombing on the score. The picture are really better than the videos. They do a fairly good job of a creating photosets that focus on the female model in her clothes or bikini for the first 40-50 pictures even. The network access and the attractiveness of the females on this site will keep the score in the 70s. If I was just scoring the action itself, it would be in the 50s. Maybe that is why they are only updating once per month? This most recent visit brought a con or negative I hadn’t experienced so far. I had been logged out for some reason. I logged back in and got a full page advertisement with a button right in the middle of the screen to accept the upsell. Really, it probably wouldn’t be that bad of an upsell. Gamma has so many good sites these days. I do believe that’s the other part that saves this site. It’s owned by Gamma or managed by them. It has Gamma’s easy join, easy self-service cancel. The part I don’t understand about their cancellation page is why if I’m signed in do I need to put my username, email and transaction ID in to cancel? I’m signed in. It reminds me of when a site (non-porn) doesn’t recognize my computer and makes me jump through hoops to pay them a payment. I’m going to be honest with you, if someone wants to hack my computer and pay my bills, tell them have at it. I don’t think any porn member knows their transaction ID. Half the time, I don’t know which email I used to sign up. They could make the easy self-service cancel a lot easier. Unless you can’t find other sites with pretty black women on them, that’s really the only reason to visit this site.
I don't know about now but when I joined their full upgrade network ($65) it seems to have given me lifetime access and there are no other charges. I didn't know whether to post that and possibly give false information about how it works now. It almost feels like this is the way it's supposed to be too. When I joined the upgrade network, I did so through Porn Pros. I only had access to Porn Pros for that 1 month. These premium standalone sites are still accessible. I also didn't know whether to post it since I know a few of us Porn Users took advantage of the $65 offer and I believe they still have access to the premium standalone sites too. I wondered if they are doing that to try and get us to take the next upgrade which adds, I think 14 more sites.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that I believe deserves billing over a lot of the teen hardcore sites.
- The site is huge as a standalone with 1,377 scenes if my math is right. You’d think I would use that calculator button on my keyboard.
- Good price for this site even as a standalone with a PU discount.
- The network upgrade you can add to this site is worth it if you don’t mind paying $65.
- The site features mostly hardcore male/female with some threesomes thrown in for good measure.
- Download speeds are good (80% of max)
- Photos with downloads but they aren’t going to make any of the photo sites jealous.
- Very good video quality all the way through the site (bottom line will cover that)
- Still updating with one scene per week. Each scene has a video, photos and screencaps, unlimited downloads.
Cons:
- The older scenes don’t have the video quality (resolution) or options of the newer ones.
- They would offer you an upgrade if you upgraded twice. And they do have an ad that pops up each time you sign in.
- This covers all their sites (upgrades), just make sure I know you don’t care about pictures. The picture download filenames are are all titled “gallery”.
Bottom Line:
This site by itself is in the same league of sites like Nubiles (I prefer this site) and the other teen hardcore sites. It is still updating with one update per week and there are 1,377 scenes so this is not a typical premium standalone site. Those rarely have over 500 scenes.
The video quality on the newest scenes includes 4K mp4, 1080p mp4, 720p mp4, 720p WMV (does anyone still watch those?) and 480p mp4. The oldest scenes see a dropoff. Those have a file extension I’ve not seen in years, mpeg and it’s the highest quality available on those oldest scenes at 720p with 4000 bitrate. Those also have a 720p WMV with only 2000 bitrate and there is a 420p with 1000 bitrate option.
There also are not photos on all of the older scenes. I don’t think any of this is that much of a dealbreaker but should be noted. This is the only site of the Porn Pros Premium Standalone sites that runs into some navigation issues. There are no tags. The search only works if you know who you’re looking for and even then I don’t trust it. Besides those minor complaints, they do still offer 720p on their oldest scenes and the newest scenes are as good of quality as 95% or higher of all sites.
The site needs better navigation. When you only have 36 or even 360 scenes, the navigation doesn’t matter as much but once you’re over 1,000 scenes, that’s 115 pages of 12 scenes per page. That’s a lot of clicking. I run my wireless mouse battery out trying to go through this site’s content.
The models step up to save the day again. The newest model is new to me and she may just get her own folder in my collection. Her name is Catalina Ossa. Vina Sky has scenes here too and where they nailed the navigation? When you go to a model’s page or a scene with the model in it. They make sure to show you every other scene the model has on their other premium standalone sites. Which is a shitty move but if you have the upgrade package you can just jump right to the models other scenes on their other sites. Which helps absorb that $65 upgrade price.
I don’t think this site is supposed to be like the hub of their premium network since I’m guessing a lot of people will only join one of the sites and not do the upgrade but this site does work well as a hub if you purchase the network upgrade. There is more content on this site and that makes it easy to switch from site to site. You do have to login in every site if you do the upgrade.
As a standalone this site would be easily recommended. As part of the network, it’s even easier to recommend and does contain probably close to as much content as all the other premium standalone sites on the network combined. I haven’t even gone through the entire network and have been a member for almost 3 months. I not only recommend this site as a standalone but will even recommend the first upgrade. No idea where that second upgrade is going to take you. Even if you’re not interested in upgrading to the network, this site is worth looking into as just a standalone site especially with the PU discounted price and weekly updates.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site with a lot of potential but I don’t think it has a pulse.
- Very pretty models in every scene.
- Good production values for these guys (sorry Porn Pros), it’s meant as a compliment.
- Technical quality on videos is as good as you’ll get unless you find one of those 6K or 8K sites.
- Unlimited downloads and download speed on this site is very good (90% of max)
- Pictures are good, though resolution could be better and the pictures are downloadable too.
Cons:
- No dates on updates and I can’t say I’ve watched the site enough to see if they’ve updated. I don’t think it’s updating.
- This is one of those sites that will make you say, “Why is this the one you aren’t updating?”
- Only 36 scenes, you’ll download them all though.
Bottom Line:
This is one of those sites that annoys me. Especially in these days of upgrade package 1, upgrade package 2, join this platinum access bundle. It’s sites like this one that get lost in all that micro-marketing bullshit.
I will make this clear without having to read any further. Unless you really like the specific models they have on this site and the high quality (which I will go into) the site offers this site is not worth joining as a premium standalone site. If you join one of their sites (Porn Pros Premium sites), it is a site you want to make sure and not miss. The 36 scenes are all worth downloading.
The quality on all 36 scenes includes 4K, 1080p, 720p as mp4 or WMV and 480p. Those are unlimited downloads and with the fast download speeds you can zip through this site’s content in no time. The photos are good, the resolution could be better at 1500x1125 but these are real photosets, not screencaps. These show the model dressed, teasing, and look like the site’s producers had a good thing going. You can download the photosets too.
Which is where more of a subjective opinion shows up. The scenes give you the feeling of heartcore, softer hardcore, whatever we’re calling that now but the sex is a little more hardcore than that niche offers. There are a few threesomes where the actors (male and female) are very believably into the sex. Some of the scenes even extend into the 40 minute range. I know member ratings shouldn’t be looked at as anything different than our review scores, opinions, but of the 36 scenes they do have the lowest member rated scene is an 8.0 and it and one other scene, an 8.7, are the only two of the 36 scenes under 9.0. Right at 1/3 of all their scenes are member rated at 9.5 or higher. If you add 9.3 to that you have 24 of the 36 scenes are rated 9.3 or higher. I even agree with most of these member ratings. These are scenes that are reminiscent of what Viv Thomas used to produce in the male/female hardcore genre. There is passion, some lust, and a genuine feel of the actors being very much into the sex.
But there are only 36 scenes and doesn’t look like any updates. This site as a standalone site would be only for the quality over quantity type of porn user. I think this number can put that in even better perspective … their 33rd best rated scene is the first 9.0. The 32 scenes before it are 9.1 or higher. I could probably make a case for joining a site like this compared to a huge network and probably keeping as many of these scenes as I would from the huge network. If you are that type who can be satisfied with quality over quantity, then one month just for this site is probably worth it. If you join their upgrade network it makes this site one of their very best. It also shows that porn sites do not listen to their fans. I can hear that discussion now, “34 of our 36 scenes on that site are rated 9.0 or higher by our fans, well, maybe we should stop updating it then!” At least look into it if you find yourself watching softcore/softer hardcore and thinking, “This is not porn.” It adds a burst of passion you don’t usually get with that niche.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Premium models, I would say cream of the crop but that sounds like a porn niche.
- Not a huge site with 156 scenes but those are very good scenes (see cons on updates).
- Download speeds are very good on this one, hitting nearly 90% of my max.
- Good pictures (a few scenes have none) though quality could better at 1500x1000 and those are downloadable in zips.
- One of their few sites without 4K but they do offer a large number of download options on their videos.
Cons:
- No dates on the scenes, I haven't seen any new updates over the last 3 months and seeing the oddity of no 4K as part of an upgrade package of standalone sites, that's a bad sign for future updates.
- Some of the scenes don't have any pictures. The picture quality is barely acceptable and that's frustrating as it looks like they were trying (attempting) to have some focus on the photos.
- As a standalone site this is going to be hard to recommend at the premium price they are asking.
Bottom Line:
This is a strange site in that it is part of a premium standalone site upgrade pack but seems to not only be dead but also has no 4K option. That's more of a sign about the site's status of being active than a big deal about no 4K to me. I wouldn't download those anyway. It just makes me think this site is dead.
The content they do have is really good. Despite no 4K, they do offer these download options on the videos: 1080p, 720p with 7000 bitrate, lower bitrate 720p and they do the same with 480p having a higher bitrate version at almost 4000, then a lower bitrate version of 480p, so all is not lost, unless you really have to have 4K.
The models are a selling point of this site and also are maybe a sign of the age of the content. I know a lot of these models but stopped keeping up with models in 2018. Thank Japanese porn for me stopping the following of specific models.
I am going to say there are no new updates and there won't be anymore updates. Making this very close to a no as a standalone site. I could maybe see someone joining it for one month as a standalone. The downloads are unlimited and the speed I download them at was very fast.
The most disappointing part for me is they looked like they were trying to make this site have more focus on photos and even scenery/background setting. There are outdoor scenes, by the pool scenes and the ideal type settings for a photo site. It's just the photos are only 1500x1000 and for some reason, some scenes don't have photos.
I do think this is one advantage a site like this has. Navigation doesn't matter. There are 12 scenes per page, 13 pages of scenes. I have complained about other sites not splitting their scenes up into pages. This is a perfect example of why every site should do it.
The one part that does save this site and does make me say maybe 1 month as a standalone is the scenes are good. The outdoor scenes are not really exhibitionism. It looks like the backyard of a house with a pool but with imagination you can see those as exhibitionist scenes. The scenes are also mostly longer than the scenes on this upgrade premium standalone site network.
If you join one of these sites and do the upgrade this is a site you will definitely want to check out. It's not one of their best sites but it is a nice addition to the $65 package you can upgrade to. Score is purely based on the site as a standalone.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Some of the cutest, tiniest models in porn.
- Good update schedule with a new scene every week.
- Each scene comes with a video and photo set (see cons)
- Big site for a premium standalone with 384 scenes as of 9/8/2021
- Technical quality will surprise you even on the oldest of those 384 scenes.
- A video format I really like 720p in 7000 bitrate
- Download speeds are good with a few slower speeds on a few videos (maybe glitches or weather in this area)
Cons:
- Upgrades are the only thing that outnumber the number of sexual positions you will see. I believe they would charge for the ability to rate the scene if they could figure out how to.
- If you join this site it is all you get unless you are willing to upgrade. It is a worthy join as a standalone if you’re into the petite models but may not be enough for some.
- Newer scenes have no download options on screencaps or photos.
Bottom Line:
The number of scenes on this site and update rate is impressive. A lot of these standalone premium sites do not have a lot of scenes or updates but this one is nearing 400 scenes and they update weekly. There is the annoyance factor of the upsells. Here’s a hint, even if you upgrade, they replace that upsell offer with a second, new upgrade option. It’s like the anus, it never ends. I think I made more funnies on that comment than most of my reviews. That was a double-dipper.
The models, if you like petite models are some of the best I’ve seen in this niche. As a big man myself, I can tell you they cast well, like putting 6’6” men in the scene. They are going to convince you she is a tiny model. I don’t know, would that qualify as production quality? It’s a smart move. If you want the upgrades you will get a lot more content and a lighter wallet but I do think the first upgrade package is worth it. Anything beyond that is something I’m not willing to do.
As a standalone, you can see the number of scenes is more than enough to warrant joining this site by itself. It’s really nice to see that new update every week. I’m guessing they have an automated updater and no I’m not paying extra if I just told your secret. They are like clockwork on this site. That is going to be a complaint for some too. The scenes are not that different from one another and you’re more likely to get a story out of my review than one of the scenes. Some of these models are worth joining just for their content. Where I don’t join a lot of different sites these days, I am new to Clary Trinity and what a future (if not already) star she is going to be. I have a good record when it comes to predicting future stardom (Eve Angel when she was Eva Shine with way too much body hair, Jynx Maze before anyone knew who she was and it was nomination here on PU for a then unknown Veronica Rodriguez as the top new model about 10 years ago). I see that with this Clary Trinity though I would change her name to Trinity Clarity. Have her agent call me about that.
You’re going to get very high technical quality on this site. All 384 scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p (two options), 480p (two options) and the downloads are unlimited. I do not download 4K. I tried it, my vision isn’t getting any better so there’s no reason for my porn quality to either. The interesting download feature this site does have is a 720p 7000 bitrate download. Those are crystal clear to my eyes.
There is a problem if you like pictures. There are no photosets. They have screencaps but no downloadable zip. This is strictly a video site. That is a change they made. A lot of the older scenes have pictures and screencaps with the pictures being downloadable in a zip. That’s way too 2021 for my tastes. Don’t believe that nonsense about we need to regress to see progress. It’s one of the only sites I have ever joined that the older content has more options than the newer content. Having said that, their pictures are underwhelming and that’s probably why they’re underwhelming. They want to show you how bad they are at taking pictures so you don’t miss them. It is really a shame, all kidding aside, they have one of the best collections of petite models I have seen and pictures, at least for me, would add a lot.
As a standalone this site is worth the $18 price as a premium standalone and if you do the upgrade this site is one their best in the entire expensive package.
(added after reading Pink Panther's review)
I don't have any other petite site memberships so didn't know this site is using licensed content from another petite site. I am not going to lower the score for that since I don't have the other site's membership and therefore, this is all new to me and new updates.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Some of the best and most beautiful Exotic models in the world.
- It’s updating but slowly (once a month)
- Above-average production qualities in the scenes.
- Downloadable videos and photo sets (see cons on photos)
- Download speeds are good at 80% my max
- 158 scenes
Cons:
- The pictures are screencaps and only have 30-50 per zip file.
- Too much advertising to try and get you to join their other sites (see next con)
- It’s a premium standalone site. Unless you are willing to pay extra, this is the only site you get for $18, I did do the upgrade and will review several of their sites to show what all you get with the upgrade.
Bottom Line:
Just put Exotics in the title and I think you’re calling my name. This site does a lot right but there are complaints. This site is still updating but a lot of their premium standalone sites aren’t updating anymore. It looks like they (believe it’s Porn Pros), should merge all these premium standalone sites into a package besides the “upgrade” nonsense. As it is, the upgrade gets you a nice collection of very high quality sites but as mentioned, not all of those sites are updating and it gets worse … there are two upgrade packages, meaning if you want every single standalone premium site Porn Pros you have to join one site at $18, then upgrade it for $65 to get all the standalone premium sites in one package, then upgrade it again for another $65 to get all their other standalone premium sites. If they combined all these sites into a premium network for even $50/month, it would be a steal. As it is, it’s going to depend on your taste and if they have enough content.
Exotics4K is one of my favorite sites they have. Probably my favorite, even. The models are top of the line with models like Vina Sky, Kimora Quin, Reyna Delacruz, I could just name the whole model list off. I am a little surprised to see Allie Addison on here, didn’t realize she’s an Exotic. Most of the models are Asian or Latina/Hispanic, maybe Allie (with those curls) is Latina? Don’t go making this an educational experience. I am going to jab them a little on that part. If they think this is an educational experience there will be an upgrade charge.
Enough picking on them, this site is really good if you like younger, Exotic women that are very pretty and most are good performers. You’re not going to find many sites with the video quality they have. The newest scene has these download options 4K mp4, 1080p mp4, 720p mp4, 720p WMV and 480p mp4. While the site is not huge, for this specific of a niche, it’s a good-sized collection and that’s where the quality really stands out. The oldest scene’s videos has these download options: 4K, 1080p, 720p, 720p WMV and even has two different bitrate versions of the 480p download option. There is no dropoff from the newest update to the first scene on the site. That’s where they are standing out in these days of varying quality and older scenes seeing a big dropoff in quality.
The pictures are frustrating. I like pictures as much as videos, sometimes, even more than videos. Considering how pretty these models are it’s all the more reason to want more pictures, higher quality pictures and a little more than just screencaps which I can take with my VLC player while watching the video. It’s just the feeling that there should be more for this premium of a site. They do give you the option to download a trailer (never have in all my years), and here comes the next questionable decision. Some of the oldest scenes look like they were going for higher quality pictures then scrapped the idea. With all this upgrade now, upgrade here, upgrade there, how about I get some money back for the scenes that don’t have the higher quality pictures?
It’s all made up for with the technical quality of the videos and attractiveness of the models. Dumb, repetitive stories? You bet your ass there are. Don’t care, hot exotic model on the screen. I don’t want to know what her favorite position is and don’t need a story to tell me WHY that male wants to have sex with her. I can see why. I think if you have the money (I don’t join a lot of different sites anymore) to join one of their sites and do the upgrades, there is a lot of very high quality, premium porn. As a standalone, I am still going to score the site high because I like the models so much. If you’re not really into exotic models you could fairly knock 10 points off my score.
It seems like as long as I've been at PU, we've had the scoring system explained as 90-100 is "best of class". It's something I used to talk to Khan about. Once the word "best" is used, which means "one" to me. It feels like the 100 is the right score to signify that to me this is the site that is the best of its class. No site could ever be perfect, so the though that a 100 is a perfect site, makes even having the 100 score, illogical. If it's not possible, why have it? That's how I ended up with two 100s. FTV, to me, is a solo, masturbation, glamorous but amateur site. It's the only one if that group or class that's even close to a 100. Zishy, follows a similar path as FTV. I love the Only All sites for their tease content but nearly every model is a pro and everything is professionally shot while Zishy is mostly amateurs and they shoot everywhere. There a newer set at Target. It makes Zishy stand out in their class,to me. And the price of Zishy, something we used to weren't supposed to consider in reviews, which I thought took the "user" experience out since we pay for the sites unlike paid reviewers that get free review passes.
If I had to pick between FTV and Zishy it would be FTV. Tease is often enough for me but not always. And while I like pictures as much as videos that's the important part to notice. I like them as much as, not more than. Zishy's videos are okay while FTV's videos are very good.
My feelings on FTV MILFs, I lowered the score on it the last time I reviewed it. It depends on the model. They are really going broad in the age range. I believe they have one was 19 on Milfs and one who is 56 or 57. It makes Milfs a little more inconsistent to me. If you don't like two of the new models, that's half of a month's new updates.
I would put FTV Girls at the top of all sites for my tastes. I recommend joining FTV Girls, they will offer you a week of Milfs for $8 and it's full access, CCBill is the biller so you can easily cancel the week membership before it rebills.
Thanks Witty, good to see you around. I'm now dealing with the obsessive-compulsiveness of wanting to get to 510 so the 5 can divide evenly into the 10. Some things never change.
My guess is you're misdirecting the blame. The review you're talking about shows the site having over 7,000 videos. The site itself is only advertising 5,297 videos. The review you're talking about lists 1,308 models. The site itself lists 1,076 models. I wouldn't lean this way but it looks like the site itself is not updating its numbers or its search engine. If you click "recent updates" it shows 2 new models being added this week in the "coming up" part. If you look at the differences between the review's model numbers of 1,308 and what the site itself lists, 1,076, that's a 232 model difference or about 3-4 years of new models. A lot of those old sites are running on broken code and the search engines are becoming useless on them.
I found this, look at this link, it shows the correct model numbers and videos numbers and shows the site looks like it's running on two different versions of software. allover30.com/New_Shoot/Sydney_Paige/23943" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https://new.allover30.com/New_Shoot/Sydney_Paige/23943
Whereas if you follow this link, it takes you to their same site but with the old numbers on at. Scroll to the bottom. AllOver30_Picture_Series/?nats=rabbit.2.1.1.256.0.0.0.0" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https://www.allover30.com/v2.2/AllOver30_Picture_Series/?nats=rabbit.2.1.1.256.0.0.0.0
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It’s that time of the year to review FTV. A site I first reviewed in 2007.
- I try to make these reviews a little different from my previous one of the same site. I don’t know if the high production values makes members think this is not an amateur site, but it is with a few exceptions.
- A steady update schedule of 4-5 updates per month. I believe they snuck some remasters in there too as bonus updates.
- I’ve been a member on this site for so long I think I have my own tag, that’s how well their tags work once you figure them out.
- I really don’t need to talk about the quality of the photographs or videos, do I? I will in the bottom line.
- It’s a strange pro but important one. The site does what it says it’s going to do. You get what you paid for.
- Being my 500th review it’s going to contradict this one, I would just be happy with a membership to this site and no others.
Cons:
- It looks like to me they’ve decided to lay off using the public nudity tag even on the scenes that show public nudity in the preview picture. I’m sure there’s a reason behind it but I relied heavily on that tag.
- Those split videos are now one of my favorite parts but other people will see them as cons.
Bottom Line:
This is review #500. If you had told me in 2007 that I would be writing my 500th review in 2021 and it would be of FTV Girls, I would have said, “What took me so long and FTV is still around?” As much as I talked about the 3 straight years of Zishy membership, it’s not quite as impressive or concerning as my 8 straight years of at least 9 months (per year) of FTV memberships. I first reviewed FTV in 2007, my first year on PU and the first year of PU.
I have explained this in previous reviews of FTV and will again. It’s something I see as a negative for some. The videos being in parts. It took me about 10 years to figure out the point of it. It is to make it where you can download only the parts you want. Because FTV does touch on different fetishes, there are some parts of the “full” video, some people don’t want or in my case, I sometimes only want the exhibitionism part of the video. Considering the FTV new scenes are in 4K, I believe it’s even more of a positive. One of the newer scenes is a total of 23GB for the video parts. I would not be happy about downloading 23GB to watch 6 minutes of exhibitionism at the first of the video. Even if I downloaded the 1080p, it would be around 10GB total and I wouldn’t be happy about storing a 10GB file or waiting on it to download just to watch 6 minutes of it. I figured this out when I couldn’t come up with a negative reason for FTV splitting the videos. Some sites (I won’t name them), split videos up so they can release one today, the other tomorrow, to make it look like they’re updating more and to boost their video count. FTV doesn’t do that. They release all the parts at the same time. It’s a feature built for improving the member’s experience with their content. Maybe I can see why it wouldn’t hurt to have a full scene download option but can tell you, I wouldn’t be using it.
I’m surprised they aren’t using their public nudity tag as much. You can look at the preview right now and see that at least half of the last 30 updates show public nudity but none of those have the public nudity tag. If that keeps bringing in more public nudity then I won’t mind or complain at all.
The models are the most important part to FTV. So many people do not realize this is an amateur site. I know there are a few exceptions but as an example, of the last 30 new models, 29 were shooting their 1st ever porn scene. I’ve said it before, every porn star started somewhere. It’s not FTV’s fault if the model goes on to film 468 gangbang scenes and that’s a major selling point of FTV for me. You get to see these models that you may never see again or that you may see fighting 16 dicks in a gangbang. I don’t believe a lot of these models go on to careers in porn. I see them more as curious, playful, often silly and flirty young women who just want to make some money and do something they may not ever get the chance to do again.
The quality is exactly what I expect from FTV. The newer videos can be downloaded in 4K, 1080p and one smaller one. Since I only download the parts of the video I want, I do download the 1080p. I usually only download 720p on other sites. The older scenes do have a drop off in resolution but outside of their earliest years, FTV has almost always had very high quality. Their pictures can be downloaded and the high resolution zip files are 5200 long end. One of my biggest compliments for FTV is the colors in their photos and videos. Their pictures and videos are life-look looking, natural lighting, instead of the lighting we see a lot of studios use that make the models look like they’re glowing in the dark.
Something has been fixed that I felt was a bigger con than the split videos. The filenaming system has been updated. For years, maybe even a decade, the scenes were all numbered 01, 02, 03 and so on. Which meant you had a bunch of 01 scenes like this 01, 01 (1), 01 (2) and no way to know who was in the video without opening it. Here is a filename of a video I just downloaded earlier “sinclair-(scene number) - 01”. That’s a major deal if you’re an organizational weirdo like me. I even looked back and downloaded a few old scenes, all scenes have the new filenaming system. That’s how you make a 99 site a 100. The site has proven time and time again to be the site I return to and my bank statement would tell you the same thing. I can’t think of anything I would change on FTV. Some of the models this year are easily in the top 10 FTV models of all-time and they were 1st timers. It’s the best site in porn, for my tastes and after 500 reviews, I have no reason to believe there’s one I’ve missed. They also use CCBill as their billing processor, not that I cancel it very often. I usually try to join it 3 months at a time, then take a month off, then back to a 3 month, month off, and back to a 3 month. If all other porn sites were free, I would still pay for FTV Girls.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A tease, light exhibitionism, masterpiece of a site.
- You don’t have to look for promos. It’s $30 for a year or $10 for a month.
- Updates 3-4 times a week.
- There are videos but I don’t download them. I do stream some of them.
- The photosets are 1900x1200 and can be downloaded.
- Math is the only way to figure out the amount of photosets, I’m going to 11 years x 160 photosets per year = around 1,750.
- CCbill is the biller, also Paypal, also can send Zach a $30 gift card from Amazon (year subscription).
- Mostly amateurs with the occasional pro. Though some of the amateurs go on to be pros.
- Decent search features, model list and more than I would expect from a $30 per year site.
Cons:
- This is a favorite con of mine. There’s not always nudity. It’s a pro for me but I know it’s a con to some.
- Really hate listing this one but a little better navigation would help. (see bottom line)
Bottom Line:
Two of my reviews, should be #499 and #500 are both going to talk about this. The amount of time a site keeps me interested. I’m nearing 36 straight months of a membership at Zishy. If I joined a lot of sites on long-term deals, maybe that wouldn’t be that impressive but I only have one other site that I am a member of for even 9 months out of each year. That to me, is reason to give the site a 100. I do believe there are improvements that need to be made but they’re not changes that are going to make the site itself or content better. The improvements would just make it easier for me to count the models and sets for reviews. Zishy is a very basic site that scrolls on one page. The first set posted was in 2011, with 3-4 new updates per week, that’s a lot of scrolling. The content itself needs nothing changed about it. There was a time when Zishy didn’t have any nudity but nudity is becoming more common now.
The site hits on so many different fetishes including: Clothing fetishes, teasing, upskirts, upshorts, panties, lingerie, public, exhibitionism, flashing and the models are mostly amateur. Most of us know the routine with amateur models. You get a lot of different looks, I know there’s at least one model who is in the last few most recent updates and the comments fill up for her. I don’t even think she’s attractive. But there are some I find attractive that only have 1-2 comments on. I believe that’s a show of what makes the site a 100. There’s not a set look they go for on Zishy. There are some heavier models, some very slim models, some athletic, race doesn’t matter, it’s a site that just focuses on capturing young women being sexy in their natural state. I get the feeling the ones that flash are in their natural state when flashing. You can see their enjoyment.
I am sure I have mentioned this before but I much prefer the outdoor photos. Those keep the possibility and tension up for a flash or panty slip or nipple slip. The models look like they’re having a great time too. I do believe a big part of the site’s success is the owner loves the tease, just like I do. I look at the pictures and think that’s exactly what I would take a picture of. I believe that is some of the separation and not as much pleasure for us viewers when it comes to the big, mainstream sites. Zishy doesn’t seem to have any set formula or plan. Most of the pictures look like the models are doing what comes to them naturally. I say that in a way some could find it negatively since not all pictures are sexual. Some are silly, some are playful, some are geeky, it just looks like the models are having fun and if Zach or another contributor happens to catch a perfectly timed picture of an upskirt the models like that.
It is a hard site to review because there’s so much variety from model to model. The models dress like they would if you were going on a date with them, not like they’re about to walk a runway. The only facts about the site I can share are it’s cheap, the photos are good quality and can be downloaded. The videos are worth streaming and possibly downloading. Some of those do show more than the pictures show. You’ll get 3-4 updates per week. And the best compliment I can give a site like this one, it is a site you can return (on a year membership) and spend an hour or more just looking at the new pictures. I have never been one to pay attention to the comments left but most of the members are friendly and positive. Everything about the site has a positive vibe. There’s not a lot of competition in the tease, light exhibitionism category but as much as I like the Only All sites, that are teasing sites, I like Zishy better. Here’s to another 36 straight months.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Should be called an adventure in avoiding clicking the wrong thing. There’s a DDF Network in here somewhere.
- If you have the patience and no itchy mouse trigger finger, it’s not a bad site at all.
- The navigation is pretty good once you mess with it enough.
- Susy Gala, where the hell did she come from?
- Joining and canceling seem simple enough but their promos do not work. I will explain in the bottom line.
- If you want the short version, the DDF Network is in Porn World and Busty Porn World. I will have to explain this in the bottom line. They have seriously complicated this.
- The navigation tabs are the whole key to making this site work.
- Averages more than an update per day.
Cons:
- It’s not good when I laughed before typing this. Lets just say here, it looks like they have around 50-100 sites on this one site and you have access to two of them. The rest require you to purchase tickets. And no, I’m not clicking the tickets to find out how much they cost.
- Going to a particular model’s page from the model list not only shows you which scenes you do have access to but also blends in the ones you have to have tickets to watch or download. I will make a comment in the bottom line about that.
Bottom Line:
I bit the bullet as they say. I’m a huge fan of the DDF Network and have been since the day they launched the DDF Network. I can tell you the DDF Network is running strong on Porn World. For some reason they do have it separated into Porn World and Busty Porn World (DDF Busty) but I do believe all the scenes are here. Those two combined: Porn World lists 14,008 scenes. Busty Porn World lists 1,942 scenes. That’s almost 16,000 scenes. All the scenes have multiple download options on those TWO sites. The newest scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p and a couple smaller ones listed as VGA and WEB. Each scene has a full picture set that can be downloaded too. That part, in my opinion, is very good. It could be better. I don’t like that all of the DDF content is now listed just as Porn World or Busty Porn World. You have to dig through the scenes to find the scenes from the different DDF sites but it’s all here from what I can tell. Porn World itself updates daily and Busty Porn World updates 2-4 times a week. I can tell you based on my old stored files, the numbers look accurate on specific models I have collected from DDF.
Now, take a deep breath. On the main screen when you login, and by the way, you are still sent to Pornbox, not Porn World. It’s like someone got a bargain of urls and has to use them all. I’m going to count how many sites are on the main page. You thought I was bullshitting with the 50-100 sites estimate in the cons, didn’t you? There are 158 sites/studios on the main page. Including Bang Bros, Bang Bros add-on sites like Dancing Bear, CFNM Show and every content-maker on Legal Porno. I can get around this. I have figured out click “Porn World” and “Busty Porn World” but you know curiosity is going to cause me or you to at least look at those others. Where I’m going to get a little frustrated is there’s a button that says “Filter studios with full access membership”. I did that. It’s 57 sites/studios showing as full access. I don’t know about you but “full access” means full access to me. You have to have tickets OR you can join the sites. I will use Bang Bros’ add-on site Dancing Bear as an example. It says you can buy lifetime access to the site for $30 or you can buy specific scenes with tickets. I took the risk after saying I wouldn’t. The tickets are 42 for $29. One Dancing Bear scene costs 12 tickets. It’s clearly a better deal to join for $30 but it only lists 82 scenes. Dancing Bear had around 105 scenes when they shut it down. Every single site they have has different rules and prices to join them. The Bang Bros one has 9 lines of rules, something about you can download the last 31 days of new scenes. I am sure there’s another charge to get “full access”. Just avoid that shit.
Porn World and Busty Porn World are good deals. The promos, I received one in email for 3 months for $29.95. Its regular price is $44.95 a month. I clicked on it and the price was $24.95 for 1 month. There was no 3 month option for $29.95. Going to the site through the PU link, the offer was $24.95 for 1 month, the same as the offer they offered me for clicking on the 3 months for $29.95 promo.
Back to Porn World and Busty Porn World. Very good DDF porn. I said for years, the DDF network was my favorite network and the new scenes do not disappoint. It’s just the complication of everything. Where are the House of Taboo updates? Where are the Hot Legs and Feet updates? Where are the Only Blowjob and One By Day updates? They’re all blended in as Porn World. It’s a hassle. I think the part that disappointed me the most was going to a model’s page, I listed her in the pros … Susy Gala. If I search for Susy Gala there are 34 scenes I can download with my Porn World subscription. It says they have 118 scenes of her. Since I don’t have an itchy mouse trigger finger, I clicked to see more. Most of them are not even Susy Gala. The scenes are of other models named Susi not Susy and looks nothing like Susy Gala. Here is what I have figured out.
At the top of any page there is a tab for “library” click that. In the search box change “store” in the drop-down menu to “library”. It then lets you just search within the scenes you do have access to. Once you do that or just go to Porn World or Busty Porn World, you’re at least out of that 156 site/studio minefield. I’m going to score it well. Once you get beyond the hassle, it’s DDF Network and the tags at least somewhat lead you to specific sites from DDF, like the tag, “masturbation” that’s usually going to be One By Day content. It’s workable and manageable but the top score I’m going is 90. I believe my last DDF Network review was 98. Patience, calm the itchy mouse trigger finger and focus. It’s better than not having any access to the DDF content.
I think I deserve tickets for this review. I didn't know my opinion was up for review. And by the way, LK, if you've forgotten, making eye jokes isn't a laughing matter with me. I'm partially blind in one eye. I'll give you the PU vet "pass" and let this one slide but seriously, review the site you're reviewing, stop shilling Teen Mega World and stop reviewing other members opinions.
Was going to send you an email, but for some reason my Gmail account didn't save your email address in it from when we emailed in the past.
Sadly, I don't have the patience to go on the hunt anymore either. It is a nice site. I found myself looking and downloading the photos more than the videos. I tried to count the videos. There were 20 per page and I was on page 100, with more pages still to go. I'm still trying to dig to that 500th review. I remember back when I reached 500 points (250 reviews), and Khan said there was no way I would ever reach 500 reviews (1,000 points in the old points system). I have two sites, longtime favorites, I am going to do and try to find a new one that's never before been reviewed for the 500th one.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- About as close to exhibitionism as you can find these days on pay sites.
- Video count is in the thousands, but is misleading.
- Photos with downloadable zips (a major plus on a site like this)
- Some good exhibitionism including full sex and these are amateurs.
- I would call it a voyeur site based on most of the scenes are filmed more like the couple or group doesn't know it.
- Very fast download speeds (90% of max)
- CCBill is the biller.
Cons:
- The biggest con is there are many videos on this site that are split into parts, as many as 17 (maybe more, that's the most I've seen). See bottom line.
- No dates on the scenes. The only way to tell the newer scenes are likely over the last few years is the people's iPhone 6+ or higher laying near them. That's putting in research work.
- Besides the obvious known problems with amateur models (some unattractive), there's no way to find more content of ones you like.
Bottom Line:
I'm pacing myself to my 500th review and thought I would try this site out. Fundamentally, there's nothing at all wrong with the site. Some of the videos are downloadable in HD. All the videos are downloadable. They have a nice section called "Albums" that has all the different photo sets of women they don't have videos of. It just has a few minor flaws.
Those split up videos are almost understandable. They are usually a Swinger Party, there are people everywhere. The split parts focus on one couple or threesome. It reminds me of watching the male stripper sites like Dancing Bear and Party Hardcore. It's hard to fault them for splitting those long scenes up to focus on a couple. One of my biggest complaints about those two male stripper sites was they took the camera off the sexiest women. But there's no way to find all the parts. And they are short videos (3-5 minutes).
I'm not going to be that rough on the score on that part. I would be complaining if they filmed 2 hour scenes and switched the camera from sexy woman to not sexy woman.
This is sex, some masturbation and some of it is just flashing/spying. I don't know where it's filmed at but I am guessing it's not in the United States.
I'm also going to guess it's near impossible to know if they are updating. There are no dates. With Covid over the last 15 months, it just seems unlikely they are. This is more like the porn sites we used to join to enjoy the hunt. That's what you're going to be doing here.
Just to show the difficulty the site creates, there is a scene I really liked titled Voyeur Sex On The Beach 55, part 03/06. They show 12 related videos over to the right but none of those are Voyeur Sex On The Beach 55, part 02, 01, 04. However, they did get a Voyeur Sex On The Beach 56 part 04/04 in the related. It reminds me of the old newsgroup websites. The search does partially work. If you search for Voyeur Sex On The Beach 55, it will bring up all the Voyeur Sex On The Beach scenes but doesn't recognize the number on the title.
Technical quality can't really be complained about. The videos are easily and quickly downloaded, even the 1080p ones. The videos have screencaps with them but those differ from the photo sets in the "Albums" section. The albums section seems to be pure voyeurism of someone taking pictures of a nude woman walking around.
With so many sites known for their exhibitionism shoots no longer shooting those types, it leaves us who like public exhibitionism looking for replacements. My score is more based on this is real exhibitionism/voyeurism, the site works well, the quality is there, the downloads are there and I think for most exhibitionism fans the attractiveness of the woman isn't the attraction. Most of these women would at worst be considered "average" looking. The sex scenes have a problem all amateur sites have. There's only one camera view. They are still good.
I just don't know if a membership is warranted unless you just want to try a relatively cheap public site for a month. I have seen worse but not many with much better, especially of amateurs.
Hey Loki, thank you, I don't see any of the scenes on the Japan HDV site broken up into parts. The navigation does get a little spotty on the older scenes, but from what I'm seeing they offer 3 different formats of the videos and each are the full scene. I don't look at much of the content on the bonus sites since the quality is lower and there are no subtitles. I will say I have joined another Japanese site thinking it was Japan HDV called JAV HD and My HD JAV that I got confused with Japan HDV. It does look like some of the videos on the bonus sites, which I take as very amateur sites (user submitted), are broken into parts but the main site itself has the full videos.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
