| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
The TBP site stats are consistent and can be quite useful when looking into new or obscure sites. The rough estimate quantity of content and quality of content is useful, especially considering most sites are less than forthcoming about their own precise stats.
However, TBP doesn't always update the stats all that often - granted they seem to be improving this as of late, but I still find some sites where that stats are over a year old. If they site in question has been reviewed by any of our core group of esteemed reviewers on Porn Users, I find the specifications provided by our reviews are vastly more useful. Specific image dimensions, download speeds, video codecs with bit rates and dimensions, up to date content summations, et cetera.
The stats that TBP provides are commendable, but I think they could be improved upon - and that, I believe, is what we here at Porn Users do with our reviews.
|
12-11-08 10:22am
|
Reply
127
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Generally natural shaped, size irrelevant toys are best, maybe matched with those super small vibrators the model can hold upon her clit. The exotic toys, while amusing, often seem to confuse the model as much as it would anyone else. I've seen a few exotics do a very good job but for the most part they are just full of sound and lights, signifying a weak performance. I think most models are distracted by the odd noises that vibrators make and get really get into a dildo better.
Only 3 vibrators seem to get good results almost every time: First is the legendary Sybian. Second is the large, baseball-on-a-stick Japanese massager that plugs into an AC outlet. Third is the small (again often Japanese) egg vibrator with a corded remote that allows the vibrator to be precisely maneuvered to wherever it will perform best. The last one seems to perform very well when used on the clit and in conjunction with either a dildo or the real thing. These results are simply from my own observations - and are hardly scientific. Some models can sell just about anything, but from my observations, those toys are best suited to produce genuine results.
|
12-05-08 08:54am
|
Reply
128
|
N/A
|
Reply of
elonlybuster's Poll
Unless the current sites I happen to be subscribed to feature really good streaming options, I would say I download at least a scene daily. Often more than that.
|
11-25-08 10:23pm
|
Reply
129
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Yes, as I had mentioned, 30 years ago it was certainly still quite a big deal. Though I must disagree with the comment that "as well as no black women in porn of any kind" - my pin-up favorite Sylvia McFarland is evidence of that. I'll grant you that black women were less visible in main-stream porn, no doubt - but if you had the motivation (and time and money), it was available.
As for the contrast in color, that can be interesting, but I find the novelty of it wears off quickly and then what keeps the scene alive is the performance itself and the attractiveness of the performers as well. A simple contrast of color will not support a scene for me. Though it must be said it could add that hard to describe x-factor that can make a good scene into a great scene. So, that all said, that is why I find it somewhat silly that it remains an established niche.
|
11-19-08 10:21am
|
Reply
130
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As a niche I've always found it a silly distinction. I understand how it used to be taboo as little as 30 years ago but these days the fact that it is still considered an important fetish amazes me. I'm much more interested in attractiveness and skill of the performers - granted their skin color can be a factor in their attractiveness but not hinging upon its relation to their partner's skin color. So while I have found many scenes that I love that fall in the Interracial category, I don't by any means specifically hunt for that content.
|
11-19-08 09:10am
|
Reply
131
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
Well, Mr. Kinsey, usually I find it's when the circus midgets begin slapping the horse's rear with the bag of meat. This is anonymous, right?
|
11-17-08 08:39am
|
Reply
132
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Hard to give a precise count right now because I'm actually downloading photos at the moment, but a rough estimate puts it around 60k. Give or take a few 10k. When push comes to shove, I'd generally take photos over videos, but by their nature, I've got more space dedicated to videos than photos.
|
11-16-08 04:51am
|
Reply
133
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Nice - I hadn't seen a John Waters emoticon before, lol
|
11-13-08 05:17pm
|
Reply
134
|
N/A
|
Reply of
dghillza's Poll
Seriously? You really want to know this? Are we now posting questions from the Kinsey report?
|
11-13-08 01:08am
|
Reply
135
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I once forgot to cancel, but more importantly forgot to write down the billing company (back when canceling was much more difficult). I haven't had much in the way of mistakes though, I've been lucky with the pre-checked trial sites, they were very cheap and I canceled them immediately. No virus laden sites either. I did join one site that was entirely made of crap bonus sites, that was disappointing, but at least I didn't pay much for it.
|
11-11-08 01:34pm
|
Reply
136
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
lol - I'm interested to see if badandy400 will answer this query precisely. Since the man calls a +3 Terabyte collection modest, the final number should be impressive. Perhaps he's counting right now? I'll check back in a week, lol
|
11-09-08 09:32pm
|
Reply
137
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
1,616... but who's counting?
|
11-09-08 01:52pm
|
Reply
138
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I once accidentally placed an anonymous rating (before I changed the default setting) but with Khan's guidance I fixed it. I always put a comment in my trust rating and even if it is a negative rating, I try to make the comment helpful and constructive. If the user I rated bad gets better, I'll switch my rating to a positive. I don't do anonymous ratings because I want the user to visit my reviews as they are examples of how I believe reviews should be done.
|
11-07-08 02:24pm
|
Reply
139
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I occasionally follow Professional Cycling. Didn't follow it as much last year as they suspended all of my favorite big name riders due to the damn drug scandals. The UCI dictated the teams couldn't modify their bicycles to ride faster, so the logical conclusion is that they would start modifying the riders to ride faster - what did they expect would happen?
|
10-30-08 08:27am
|
Reply
140
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
My current monitor is a simple 19" ViewSonic LCD. It was considered a gaming monitor back in its day with a refresh rate of under 3ms, but these days that is rather common place. Its native resolution is 1280x1024, so that's what I keep it at. Anything lower it looks fuzzy, and anything larger wouldn't look better - it would simply grant me more desktop space.
One of these days I plan on upgrading to a widescreen LCD capable of above 1080p resolutions (1920x1080) but the prohibitive prices matched to these products has kept that from becoming a reality. For the time being this monitor is doing just fine.
|
10-22-08 04:01am
|
Reply
141
|
N/A
|
Reply of
elonlybuster's Poll
Simply put: I don't go to action movies to see people jump cars over exploding mountains while wearing a fire-retardant suit and a crash helmet.
Models in porn are in many ways more similar to stuntmen than traditional actors - we pay them to perform various sexual feats that are usually considered outside the norm and even dangerous. I understand that stuntmen often do wear protective gear - but they take great strides for us not to see it. So if porn figures out a way to hide the condom from the camera, all the power to them - until then I think there will always be a market for condom-free porn.
|
10-20-08 01:09pm
|
Reply
142
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Assuming it is a rather large gallery, I'll usually pop through the gallery looking at a few random pages to get a feel for the content. If I love the content I'll go back to the first page and look through it, image by image, in order, from beginning to end. Then I'll go to the model's page, assuming the site is set up in that manner, and save a bookmark to download all of her content at a later date. Sadly this often builds huge bookmark folders meaning I have a hell of a task in front of me once I decide to download the content. For example, I'm finally archiving ATK Natural and Hairy - the bookmark folder consists of 272 models. Since I have to make a folder for each photo set, download and assign a thumbnail for the model's main folder and then assign a preview thumbnail for each set... this could take a while.
|
10-18-08 08:57pm
|
Reply
143
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I used to use Yahoo! anytime I was looking for an official site, like a company website, but Google has improved their results so much that most engines just pale by comparison.
|
10-16-08 10:20am
|
Reply
144
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
Pidgin. I used to use AIM exclusively, but as people started diversifying their preferences for IM systems, I needed a program that could interface with them all. These days, that program is Pidgin.
|
10-14-08 09:54am
|
Reply
145
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Despite videos taking up the bulk of my dedicated porn file space, I must say that I'm a photo guy at heart. So, assuming the site has photos, I'll gravitate to those first. Photos or Videos, I always traverse a site's terrain via the models. My entire collection is organized by site / production company first and model name second (preferably with a head shot to accompany the name) - so naturally it is by model name that I explore the site.
|
10-12-08 02:19am
|
Reply
146
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Assuming the raffle's engine truly random, I see it as perfectly fair. To earn tickets you need to be writing reviews and actively participating in the Porn Users community - limiting users from winning multiple weeks in a row punishes the most active members.
If popular opinion dictates that people shouldn't win multiple weeks in a row, I think their tickets should roll over to the next week. That'll keep infrequent reviewers like myself from holding off on a review just to make sure the tickets it generates actually count. While I don't actively hunt for tickets, I'm sure as hell quite aware of them.
|
10-10-08 12:16am
|
Reply
147
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
Meh, so much of this question depends on what type of person your boss is and what your relationship with them is. My current boss has asked the question and gotten an honest response. This is because of the type of person he is though. The first time I went to his house (for the annual company x-mas party) there were Peter North DVDs sitting on the TV in the living room. One could say our company doesn't have the normal, political correct atmosphere due to our boss. He often amuses himself by very loudly reading out the content of the most graphic porn Spam he has received that day. Of course, stuff like that is one of the reasons we try to make it very clear to him when walk-in customers are in the building.
So my answer with this boss was a simple "yes" - but with other bosses, I might have to pussyfoot more. In America's culture, it is still a rather taboo question, so if a boss were to broach the subject, I think it is rather telling about that person. If the boss is a woman - I'd disagree with Monahan's contention that it could be a sexual harassment situation that would get the employee fired, more likely the other way around - as the question states that it was the boss asking and on lunch break. Granted the no comment answer is safe enough, though will be seen as passively answering the question with an affirmative. I tend to be a rather honest person (I generally only lie for entertainment), so I'd still probably say yes - and because I'd be very curious as to why the question was being asked.
Still though, it very much depends on the person asking and the type of company and so on. If I didn't trust or like my boss, I might say no to simply kill the conversation.
|
10-06-08 07:27pm
|
Reply
148
|
N/A
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Poll
If a model is attractive, then I always would rather more content than less.
|
09-24-08 03:33pm
|
Reply
149
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
Porn Stars have a tendency to just vanish from the scene all of a sudden, so I don't bother specifically hunting for certain models anymore. I certainly do remember many and will download them right away if I happen across them, but I search for sites whose content in its entirety attracts my attention.
|
09-22-08 05:43pm
|
Reply
150
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Don't worry - if they could replace Lloyd Bridges' tongue with one supplied by a Labrador Retriever, I think they can do it for your nose. They have the technology. They will rebuild you.
|
09-19-08 03:17pm
|
