Ha ha, I love the second RE movie, not the others so much. Excluding the "twat shot" in the first one of course - Milla's own words btw (check out the commentary track).
As for origins of the zombie apocalypse scenario? The poll stated that the pornstar was "walking on the road beside you". To be walking two abreast (::snicker::) on the road, I surmised there mustn't be cars on the road. Since there aren't any cars on the road, the obvious conclusion is that society as we know it has been torn asunder by a Zombie Apocalypse.
You are more than welcome in my fortified zombie-repellent compound, pat362. I hadn't thought of large snowblowers - those are designed to take some serious punishment, no doubt.
As for the reason zombies eat brains - well there are a number of possible explanations. Most experts say zombies need living human blood to get the right nutrients, enzymes, chemicals and so on to function optimally. The brain is an excellent blood source and is a great protein source. Another idea is that zombies can regenerate some of their brain either by eating active synapses or perhaps the stem cells. The idea is that your basic zombie has little more than their brain stem working. That is why almost all upper level functions are down - they are like a common house fly, running on nothing but reflex. It is possible that a zombie fed healthy human blood regularly will retain near human appearance and cognitive abilities.
Of course, a zombie is also 100% uninhibited. This means that unlike normal humans, they have a continual supply of adrenalin, so they aren't exactly inhumanly strong, they just will happily tear their own ligaments and break their own bones to achieve their goal - whatever it may be. Eating you is probably pretty high on their list.
All things considered, it is unlikely the goal of a zombie is to eat your brains specifically. The idea that zombies hunger for the brains of the living may stem from a witness seeing a zombie consume the head of a human. A zombie will eat your brain, but that is because they will eat just about anything with a heart beat. (Though only human blood is certain to benefit human zombies.) It is important to note that zombies do not need their heart. They will continue operating without any part of their body excluding the brain stem. If you destroy that, you destroy the zombie. It is unfortunate for those who behead zombies low on the neck only to find the disembodied head gnawing on their ankle moments later.
Another note on killing zombies, while fire can destroy them, it'll take a little while. Just because a zombie is in flames doesn't mean it isn't still dangerous. Keep your distance from any active zombie.
Since we were both walking on the road I must conclude that the world is ending in a zombie driving apocalypse so I doubt his or her expertise in the porn industry would be of much use at that point. I would try my best to keep them alive for the later months when we need to focus on repopulating the earth. However, my first priority would be acquiring access to a secure strong-hold.
Government buildings built between the 1950's and 1970's are often heavily constructed as they were designed to be shelters in the case of national disasters. It would be best to locate a building with some sort of motor pool and welding equipment, as we will need to armor the vehicles needed for supply runs. There are a number of factors that need to be addressed though. If the building doesn't have electricity, then we need generators. Generators need gas, so acquiring a tanker truck would be a good idea. Also - water services will probably be down, so we'll need to drill a well - that also takes specialized equipment.
Then there is the problem of the zombie population. Zombie and fire don't mix well, so a large amount of the population could be culled by burning the surrounding area. If you can get your hands on some harvesters, you might be able to grind up crowds of them and burn the remains. Snow Plows would also work, but the DOT facility for those will probably be on the edge of town, so getting to them could be tough. Then again, the same applies for the harvesters unless you can locate an in town dealership.
In any case, I suppose a pornstar could provide some entertaining conversation for the low spots between resource acquisition and the zombie onslaughts.
The first answer should be "Love seeing them nude" as you can usually find nude photos of popular runway models. Milla Jovovich, Omahyra, et cetera. Not hard to find, I'm glad to say. Fashion models definitely falls within one of my fetish mainstays. Then again, we all know I have quite a few mainstays in the world of porn. So choice two is the way to go - would love to see them in porn.
I haven't submitted many poll questions, but I always run through the previous polls to make sure there isn't an obvious duplicate. I have noticed a few polls have come up that seem rather similar to past polls, but as has been said, if enough time has passed, it can be valid to ask again.
Not scared of clothes, myself. I'll take a near divine Beauty in a Nun's habit over a Wilhelm Scream spreading wide enough to show her cervix any day. Usually.
I can't speak for all - so I voted maybe, maybe not. I could certainly understand if a male viewer was exploring interest in homosexuality that a gang-bang video might be a good transitional media.
For me, who does like gang-bang content, it is about the fantasy of a the female model having a unquenchable lust and needing that much sexual attention. I do not deny that the male performers matter, they are on the screen quite a bit, and if they aren't somewhat attractive at least, it can kill a scene for me, even if the female performer is very beautiful. Granted, my standards aren't nearly as high for the males as it is for the females, but I still factor it in. Still, the attraction of the gang-bang content for me is about the female model doing extreme sexual acts, not about what is performing the act on her - this is the same as to why I like Hentai tentacle sex scenes but don't have a collection of photos of monsters with penis shaped tentacles. The fantasy revolves around the girl and the action, not the other players in the act.
I took the poll as Khan was saying there - not sex tapes but more along the lines of photos. I've got a small collection of celeb content focused a few stars I rather like. Pretty much all of it has been collected by sifting through Google Images, as I've found pay Celebrity Nudes sites to have access to less content than Google.
As for whom is in my collection? Milla Jovovich, Bai Ling, Audrey Hepburn, Kelis, Omahyra, the Hilton sisters, Qi Shu, Lucy Liu, Sandra Bernhard, Halle Berry, Delfine Bafort, Monica Bellucci, Ziyi Zhang, Cyd Charisse, Kay Kendall, Ryoko Hirosue... that's all that is coming to mind. Most of the content is Non Nude, but that is the thing with celebs in the American market at least - doing much nudity is often considered a no-no and gets you type cast.
Despite rarely using IE (who really bothers with the MS on the front?) I do have image resizing & dithering off, in case I ever do look at large image using IE.
In Firefox (my preferred browser) - I also have the image resizing jazz turned off.
Generally, if I see a scene is described as including a DP I expect vaginal and anal simultaneous penetration. However, I would accept and dual penetration involving the orifices that reside between the model's legs. I do get annoyed when a scene involving oral and vaginal or anal sex is described as double penetration - that simply does not qualify in my opinion.
I have no fear of people knowing my interest in porn though I'd probably be rather annoyed if the shop person brought it up as they did with Monahan's experience. The truth of the matter is that I'm quite skilled with computer repair - so I've only taken the computer to the shop once and it turned out to be a memory timing problem on some very finicky Corsair memory. The computer had been reformatted so many times by the time they got their hands on it that I think even if I used to have the Kennedy assassination files on it they wouldn't be able to find them. (And no, I don't do the quick formats.) Still - while it isn't the case, I feel like repair people should treat their customer's property respectfully and avoid discussing anything that doesn't pertain to the immediate problem.
I've always been a proponent of the highest quality video possible and these days that is 1080p. In reality that is 1920 x 1080 (not 1980). Granted sometimes I don't bother downloading the highest resolution possible - it depends a good deal on the quality content. Bad camerawork or lighting can't be fixed by really high resolution video.
That all said, the real question for me is: Why in Sam Hell would anyone download a 5 minute movie clip? The only site I know of that I would even remotely consider that acceptable would be In The Crack due to the very specialty nature of their content - but that is short even for them. While I still maintain that streaming video is the future of internet video (VideoBox, Hulu and Netflix are great examples that future is nearly here) I also believe that forcing your customers to piece together a scene is just plain silly these days - if you don't have broadband in this day and age you either don't want it or live with a compliment of wild creatures as companions.
Well back when I was younger, even then the model rockets and progressed far from the old light 'n run tactic with the addition of electric starters and a long-ass cord so you could be safe in your bunker... if you had one. Not to say that kept the launch pads from falling over and shooting the rocket at cars, houses and people. Still - as a hobby, there are quite a few die-hards that launch things high enough that they are bound by Federal Law to notify local airports (even if the airports can't tell them not to launch). These days I'm a bit more interested in that type - especially as you can outfit them with video cameras and such.
I love porn, but it is hardly my #1 hobby. Enjoying movies, music, food and driving are the biggies. Porn ranks in right after those, probably. After that, reading, walking, occasionally biking. Then I have about a thousand of little projects that I mess about with here and there. My biggest problem is that I never have enough time to follow all of my interests. I'd love to take up rocketry again... I still haven't built a remote control lawnmower. I want to learn how to rappel down mountains and such. I have plans for a car computer, but funding is shy on that. Probably money will go into a new movie projection system first. Time and money - always the biggest hurdles for my projects...
I've never really gotten into the spirit of the various sites or forums that offer direct interaction with the models. Nor have I gone out of my way to discuss anything with a model. I have, on the other hand, chatted with a number of content providers - photographers, videographers and web masters.
I don't really count chatting with a live webcam model as direct contact as it is a public forum and she is focused on selling something you usually. With the exception of a few of the membership web cams, but that was just normal wasting time chatting. The only reason I can think of for directly wanting to contact a model would be to hire her, and right now I have neither the capital nor the equipment to be photographing proper good porn.
Haha - only if McCain were 3 or 4 thousand years old. Actually, their estimate of the Earth's age (which would also be the Universe's age) might be a bit longer than that - I can't remember.
Oh! I'm an idiot - sorry, lol. In that case - yes! All the freaking time! The web is so incomprehensibly massive, that I often run across articles mentioning some obscure website - especially little project pages or articles on various studies and so on. Science magazines are great for finding nifty little sites for more content on one topic or another. Hmm... that reminds me, I have to renew some subscriptions...
Off-line as in, in the real world? Not really - as I don't have subscriptions to any industry magazines and any site big enough for main stream media to pick up on I've already run across via online resources. As for friends, I am their adviser for porn - so I rarely, if ever, learn about new sites from them. So there really should be a sixth option: "Not Applicable."
I will do so if requested by the webmaster personally or if I have some specific point I want to tell them. Otherwise I let my reviews do the talking (assuming I remember to write one).
I generally get about 80 to a 100 spam emails a day, however I've never actually kept track of what sites were causing it. It isn't all that inconvenient. Sure it would be nice to not have spam, but current spam blockers are pretty good.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
