| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Very important in two ways - in solo instances the model looks more attractive when looking directly at the camera (this is standard human response that studies have oft confirmed, though sample sizes sometimes leave a bit to be desired), and in scenes with two (or more) models performing together, I prefer to see the models making eye contact with each other. If it is a hardcore scene, they should not be looking at the camera - it is no fun when they break the "fourth wall".
|
05-23-08 01:22am
|
Reply
177
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I generally try not to - as a good preview page usually is the equivalent of a limited trial. However, I understand a webmaster's hesitation for doing a full trial. If I were running a site, I would focus my efforts on a good preview page and not offer any trial.
I have on occasion accidentally joined a limited trial - that was always upsetting.
Btw, there is a typo in the quiz: "depeding"
|
05-21-08 03:07am
|
Reply
178
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
A Drooler and Denner pointed out, the sheer number of porn websites necessitates that there will be ones with unethical (no dash necessary) business practices. Frankly, by its very nature the question is rather vague and certainly far reaching - unethical practices can be little, annoying things like the pre-checked trial sign-ups or content rotation to big, serious things like identity theft.
I would say half of the sites in the world practice some sort of unethical business methodology. I would say those that are seen in TBP's database are much less likely to behave in such a manner. Many sites are plain bad, but not that many are trying to rip you off per-say.
|
05-15-08 02:23pm
|
Reply
179
|
N/A
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
lol - Max Hardcore, yes I couldn't have picked a better suggestion myself. That would be perfect. America watched them grow up, now it wants to see them degraded :-P
|
05-09-08 08:35am
|
Reply
180
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Sorry, folks, I understand there are sentimental and nostalgic attitudes about this among you - but I really feel this is a silly topic.
Am I to believe that people can't enjoy "Some Like It Hot" the same way anymore because Monroe is dead? The same goes for porn, it is just entertainment. I think you are tying way too much of an emotional connection to these stars if you feel you can't watch their work after they've passed on. People die peacefully and tragically; it happens. What matters is that their work lives on and is enjoyed by future generations, even if it is "just porn".
Unless, you mean for me to take the question literally. In that case: Of course it bothers me! Zombies are NOT sexy!
|
05-03-08 12:36pm
|
Reply
181
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Ah the sexbot, how I wait for thee.
|
05-02-08 09:03am
|
Reply
182
|
N/A
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Poll
"High Quality"? lol, are they gold plated? Eh, I'd call the poor bastard and tell 'em to come pick up the box 'o porn.
|
05-01-08 08:14am
|
Reply
183
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
The Gremlin all the way! I've never seen a Camaro shoot an old lady out of a house on her electric stairs chair.
|
04-28-08 03:05pm
|
Reply
184
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Excellent, excellent! The serial number idea is gaining momentum. Now to step it up one more - all models that work in the industry longer than 3 months required to get a RFID chip implant. A very small one, and the content producers can just scan it when the model walks through the door, make a note of it and then display it on the screen when they first show the model. The number could also be tied to all sorts of industry things. It could fill out most of the model release paper work - the producers would just have to bring their laptop and a small printer to the shoot. It could give them the latest dates for the models tests, pull up her 2257 age information and so on. Of course the producers would have to subscribe to the industry database to get that info, it wouldn't be open to the public - but it really could be a huge time saver for the models, producers and public alike!
|
04-27-08 10:35am
|
Reply
185
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
My suggestion is for all porn stars to be registered with a serial number, they could have a bar code tattoo like Hitman or just wear porn dog tags. So at the beginning of a scene, like a captured soldier, they can read out their serial number and then the producers can call them whatever they want. We'll be able to tell who is who though because of the unique number they are identified by.
Now the question is, how much am I joking with that suggestion? You know it would be less confusing...
|
04-27-08 06:00am
|
Reply
186
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Haha, they also say that for cheese and I'm not sure anybody ever wants to be compared to cheese, :-P
|
04-26-08 01:57pm
|
Reply
187
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
Don't forget to stop by the forum - it is rife with topics of discussion, lots of interesting commentary. I spent the better portion of last evening writing up an article of sorts on my views about reviews, the function they serve and what I consider the proper creation of a review.
Check it out and join in - don't forget we can all do nifty Avatars now as well. I think Wittyguy was suggesting an Avatar gallery for the forum, lol
|
04-26-08 01:56pm
|
Reply
188
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Cheers to that! I do prefer the term Mature as well - Cougar would be my second fav - though perhaps that is just because I like the idea of the so called Cougar (and that it has no bearing on the status of the woman's offspring).
Maybe Porn Users needs to create the next term ourselves?
How about: Sagelet
|
04-25-08 08:03pm
|
Reply
189
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
According to some pop-culture t-shirts and an episode on Brazzers, the term you are looking for is DILF (as in Dad I'd Like to Fuck). I am totally unaware of the status of this term in the gay community though - hopefully someone can chime in on that.
EDIT: LOL, Porn Users answered the question for me. Apparently DILF is a gay porn site, so I guess the term IS alive and well in the gay community!
|
04-25-08 07:49pm
|
Reply
190
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
Hey Pinche! Welcome back! :-)
|
04-25-08 07:47pm
|
Reply
191
|
N/A
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Poll
People get to hung up on the actual meaning of the abbreviation "MILF" - for the most part, it is just in vogue right now. The term "Mature" is out. Something else will replace MILF in time.
As for my response if I found my own mother on a Mature or MILF site? Laugh and laugh and laugh - because I'd know she was only doing it for kicks as she sure as shit doesn't need the money.
|
04-25-08 08:08am
|
Reply
192
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
While I don't count the cost of the membership into my reviews, the truth of the matter is it sometimes plays a major factor in deciding what sites I join. I keep a listing of sites I'm planning on joining - and usually the cheaper ones get joined quicker. So the discounts are really helpful by making sites financially accessible and always appreciated!
|
04-23-08 12:18am
|
Reply
193
|
N/A
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Poll
Well, as I've basically never watched Gilligan's Island I'm not sure how accurately I can answer the quiz, but looking at images on Google I'd probably prefer Tina Louise ("Ginger Grant") to Dawn Wells ("Mary Ann Summers"). Also, in regards to Khan's generalized variation of the poll - I generally prefer the glamor model type to the the girl-next door look. That is a major reason why I'm fond of Eastern European porn.
|
04-21-08 08:55am
|
Reply
194
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Well they could have stuck with the 6 traditional continents, simply exclude Antarctica because Penguins make their own porn. Or perhaps this is the heralding for more poll options - if even the masters of Porn Users are getting constrained by it then something must be done! ::cue dramatic music:: ::a crowd of people point to the sky as a fleet of airplanes fly overhead::
|
04-17-08 03:32pm
|
Reply
195
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Ah, but if Greenland's colonial status with Denmark makes it a member of Europe, is Israel then a member of North America? I mean, they might as well be our colony... Well for that matter, I don't think Canada ever officially segregated from the UK - they still have "relations" if you will.
|
04-17-08 03:27pm
|
Reply
196
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
The other category really offers up quite a large number of locations:
*Africa and its many nations
*The Middle East
*Australia and New Zealand
*Antarctica (as you pointed out)
*Central America (if it is still considered a valid subcontinent)
*South America
*Any of the various mid Pacific and Atlantic island nations
*Russia (though some would call it part of Asia or Eastern Europe so maybe not...)
*The North Pole (and its surrounding international waters)
*Greenland
*Iceland (almost qualifies for above island nations category)
*The International Space Station
*The Lost Empire of Atlantis
*and lastly Andorra because I think the country we know as "Andorra" is really just an Embassy for the Andorran people on Earth and one day they will reveal their true nature, clad in silver skin suits and carrying phallic rifles and offer to sponsor us in our bid to join the Empire of Planets.
Oh - and I agree, Antarctic porn is an excellent idea - if researchers really want funding to work down there - they should just install web cams in all of their huts and only send down pretty female research students to have them perform any indoor research in the nude. They could also do Penguin on Penguin porn as well.
|
04-17-08 02:17pm
|
Reply
197
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
::groan::
|
04-17-08 09:06am
|
Reply
198
|
N/A
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
I'm curious by your definition of plenty - I've researched on the web about female ejaculation quite a bit - and while there is a lot of material written up about it, I find very little of it is based in actual scientific fact. It isn't hugely surprising as it is an area of study that isn't going to be real easy to get funding.
It wasn't more than 80 years ago when people were going on about the "Myth of the Female Orgasm" - so getting an organization to donate money for research into Female Ejaculation is going to be a bit difficult. If you do find those links, I would be interested - but as far as everything I've read on it - the medical community isn't at all settled on the topic. Some people believe it to be real, others believe it to be fake, and most simply aren't decided or care.
|
04-15-08 01:06pm
|
Reply
199
|
N/A
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
Indeed - all the material I've read about it has stated that it is not pee, any amounts of urine detected are such trace amounts that it rules that out. I did read about lab that did a chemical analysis of several samples of ejaculate - it was interesting but mostly what they said was - it isn't urine and it is basically water. Interesting but not wildly helpful.
|
04-15-08 01:02pm
|
Reply
200
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
In porn, it is often easier to fake it - and there are two ways of going about that - the more popular method is simply peeing, but you sometimes will see scenes where they fill the vaginal cavity with water and the model then pushes it on cue - these are the really silly squirting scenes where there is a cut directly before the squirting and the male pornstar jumps out of the way acting all surprised.
Peeing is most effective, because, in real squirting, it is effectively peeing, it is just not urine that is being peed. Current research ties it to stimulation of the Skene's gland which then produces fluid that fills up the bladder and women can learn to relax and pee through their orgasm and many find increased pleasure due to this. Some researchers think that the ejaculate comes from the paraurethral ducts - but do the volume of fluid it is generally considered to be the urethra that is directing the fluid - back again to the peeing theory. The peeing theory is also backed up by the volumes of the largest recorded ejaculations are nearly the same as the volume held by the average female bladder.
The problem with all research into female ejaculation is there really hasn't been a lot of scientific interest into the subject. So there are proponents and opponents but as for definitive answers - they are few. I believe that many women are capable of it and that some women who rush off to the bathroom after sex just need to relax their bladder during orgasm - but it is a bit of a faith sort of thing right now because the research just isn't there yet. As twisted as this may sound, what would be really useful is another batch of Nazi scientists and their lack of moral convictions to do some more human experiments. Their live autopsies provided invaluable medical research and I'm sure they could solve the female ejaculation question once and for all. The Nazis were horrible and so on, but some of them were very good scientists. Who knows, maybe somebody will invent a super accurate CAT Scan type thing and will record a couple hundred women orgasming and track it down that way. That would certainly be more humane and doable in today's world.
|
04-15-08 09:44am
|
