| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
Reply of
sissymaid's Review
You must be kidding me, sissybotnetwork...
|
06-29-12 02:57pm
|
Reply
27
|
Susan Wayland
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
I understand your opinion but I am probably too weak to stay away entirely. I am planning to join for a month now in order to grab the most interesting new updates and then quit again. There is absolutely no way for me though to stay 6 months just to get some high res options. It will serve them right if someone shares the high res content on a torrent site.
|
06-27-12 08:53am
|
Reply
28
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
I understand your irritation. Currently I am trying to convert my DVD collection into .mkvs for storage on my hard drives. Only lately I managed to get rid of the synch problem. I would suggest you use VLC where you can adjust the time lag between audio and video if there are particular vids you are especially fond of.
|
06-23-12 11:51pm
|
Reply
29
|
Susan Wayland
(0)
|
Reply of
tboy's Reply
It's the same as before. I once asked them if they will remove it in the future but never got a reply. But I think you can also have a nice membership time without the ultrahighres pictures. The standard resolution is already sufficient (at least from my point of view).
|
06-23-12 02:07pm
|
Reply
30
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
You have so much criticism and cons that I was surprised to see a 79 which is just one point below "very good". Some points you mention would be a real turn off for me, for example the basic set of fat, middle aged men (I wouldn't be surprised if they are the same as in ClubDom.com), the non networking and searchability and the mixed bag of models. Good review though because I will avoid this site now.
|
06-21-12 11:13am
|
Comment
31
|
Susan Wayland
(0)
|
|
06-20-12 10:02am
Replies (3)
|
Review
32
|
Strapon Cum
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-unique fetish content (squirting strapons, pantyhose, latex, solo, anal, creampie, fantasy costumes (ballerina, school girl,...) etc.)
-models are young and exceptionally beautiful and could as well model for a teenie site
-newer videos come in HD, there are always mobile versions available and streaming, the camera work is professional and steady, the sets are very decent and comfy looking
-counting a total of 106 videos
-galleries are well shot with high resolutions of 1920x1278 and nice lighting; they look very crisp and clean and come in .zips
-videos are labelled by fetish content
-newer watermarks in the videos and galleries have been reduced in size and changed to the letters "straponcum.com" in the lower right corners (compared to the bigger logos from older shoots) |
| Cons: |
-content is not dated (I hate that)
-updates are nearly suspended, I was a member for one month now and there was only one update
-customer support responds quickly but is not effective; I complained that the comment function doesn't work anymore and they promised to fix it but never did
-initial personal feedback from the director ceased to exist which I really appreciated in the "early days"
-wouldn't hurt to offer some more formats like .mp4 instead of .wmv only
-34.95$ per month is too pricey |
| Bottom Line: |
I already mentioned that I didn't regret to join again (just for a month though). The main reason was to obtain the newer stuff, which, from my point of view, is pretty awesome.
There has been a steady development from clumsy handling of the strapons by the girls to really hot scenes with experienced and scorching hot screwing action.
The second improvement is the more sophisticated acting of the girls. I always mocked their exaggerated behavior in their 2008-2010thish time, like already faking an orgasm when in reality nothing serious has happened. The newer videos are far more authentic. I was surprised that I even like their solo scenes now.
Personally, I like the nice combination of fetishes with the hot strapon action. You get to see gallons of goo spurting from inside a pantyhose for example, even some creampies with the artificial goo. You will see it splashing on naked hot bodies covered with latex, into high heels, on feet and on stockings. I especially love the reactions of the girls being splashed, mostly starting to laugh after the 10th or so spurt with this amazing amount of goo.
The bottom line is that this site is not well suited for porn users who expect a huge buttload of content which is updated every day so it can justify a long term membership.
I am torn to give a fair rating because the new content really blew me away. The update schedule and the other cons cannot be rationalised away though. Because there are real gems to be found here I rate it in the upper region of the average rating, just below very good. |
|
06-06-12 01:37pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No. In the western world I don't think it is or will be possible. I like to cite Dr. House (don't remember his exact spelling) here: "If they ban porn from the internet there will be only one single internet site in the future with the title "We want our porn back"."
|
06-05-12 10:28am
|
Reply
34
|
Kinky Kicks
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
For this niche it's not uncommon that the man who gets kicked in the nuts wears a mask. I am not really sure why they like to remove the facial expression during the kick. Maybe it spoils the aesthetics, I don't know. It's always amazing how much the balls can take. I once saw a scene at clubdom.com where a guy was literally drawn across the floor with the domme pulling his ballsack to her. He was nearly passing out though. I agree with you that I don't recommend this practice and also the sexyness is quite gone going to such extremes.
|
06-03-12 12:38am
|
Reply
35
|
Dancerbating
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review
Nice review, thanks. I was a member looong time ago at shinydolls.com. If I am right this is some sort of follow up with the dancing theme etc. My problem with this site was really that after hearing for the 100th time "Hi, my name is Lola..." and the same softcore action my interest hit rock bottom and I am surprised she has the energy for all that stuff. I also think Lola is hot and all that, but it was just not enough for me.
|
06-02-12 12:53pm
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Defintitely don't like it. I know the japanese love it but for me it's just a disgrace for the woman. In another context and with one man it could be OK. But with 10-20 men covering her whole face, c'mon who needs this shit (even not taking into account the health issues)?
|
05-26-12 12:18pm
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Desktop. What's a tablet, some sort of food tray?
|
05-21-12 05:22am
|
Reply
38
|
Latex Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Review
I am not sure if this site is the official successor to Latexotica but it looks like a perfect copy to me. Always wondered how they could (in good conscience) produce such generic work over more than approximately eight years. Looking at the galleries always gave me the feeling of mass production.
|
05-19-12 02:20pm
|
Reply
39
|
The Rubber Clinic
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Hmmm, their site says:
"We also DRM all of our videos for protection, however the licenses last for up to 5 years whether a member or not as long as you DO NOT! Share, Move, or post on Peer to Peer sites etc."
|
05-17-12 02:54am
|
Reply
40
|
Rubber Tanja
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Reply
If they go DRM, they are digging their own graves. Besides, it is very uncommon to have "massive" copyright infringements for this niche material. I can only speak for myself but if DRM arrives I will leave asap.
|
05-16-12 07:43am
|
Reply
41
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Reply
Compared to Rubberdoll, Eva's site is angelic! Not to be harsh again, but I always disliked Rubberdoll's site. Talking about boring shootings and lifeless scenes they would win a prize. But I see where this is going, so I will stop here ;-).
|
05-16-12 05:42am
|
Reply
42
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Review
Nice review. All points you mention are pretty valid. Especially the non DRM thing surprised me. Over the years I always tried to warm to this site but never could (Rubberclinic included). The models were not my type and personally it felt they had only two or three at all. The acting is kind of crappy with all the faked moaning from the start and the exaggerated slow motion of the models in every scene. I also didn't like Eva's preference for yellowish and frilly rubber. And the silly suspense music in nearly all of their videos is a real deal-breaker. The list could go on but I will stop with the bashing here. Suffice to say that's only my humble opinion. If 90 for you is the score of choice so be it.
|
05-16-12 12:26am
|
Comment
43
|
Strapon Cum
(0)
|
|
05-15-12 09:55am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
44
|
Quality Control
(0)
|
|
05-13-12 10:43am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
45
|
Rubber Tanja
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
I put some paragraphs into it. I hope it's easier to read now.
|
05-07-12 11:42pm
|
Reply
46
|
LOL Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
At LOL Lesbians they use the expression "Real Teen Lesbian Girlfriends Shooting Hot Sex Tapes At Home And Submitting Them For Cash". This surely sounds better than "Messing around with dumb porn users for selling professionals as amateurs who shoot their lesbian experiences at home". Anyway, providing just one 2 min. preview clip is not enough to keep me hooked.
|
05-06-12 03:09am
|
Reply
47
|
LOL Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
The preview clip is kind of nice, but if these are really professionals faking to be amateurs the site wouldn't be so interesting anymore.
|
05-06-12 01:00am
|
Reply
48
|
Riding Boots
(0)
|
Reply of
UKInet Media Lt's Reply
Oh, OK, that's nice! But you should mark them accordingly. I was clicking away on all the "not first row" pictures and always forwarded to your join page. I know many other sites which have the same strategy and it's just annoying. Would it hurt to change the whole preview page into clickable full size pictures (would be 20 instead of 5 then)?
|
05-04-12 10:26am
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Poll
Unless it's Trinity from the Matrix, please take them off!
|
05-04-12 02:18am
|
Comment
50
|
Riding Boots
(0)
|
|
05-04-12 12:44am
Replies (2)
|
