| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
I liked your review because you address many points I would have mentioned too and the final score seems fair. Have you ever considered to look at "I feel myself"? Personally I didn't like it much but in your case if you don't mind they have mostly solo scenes they do have decent video quality and usually the pacing is faster.
|
05-03-12 10:05am
|
Reply
52
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Comment
Sorry to hear that. I am a regular customer there and never had this problem. Wait for the customer service to answer. Usually they are very concerned about customer problems.
|
05-01-12 11:39pm
|
Reply
53
|
Beshine
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
That's right, but I really hope she visited a professional therapist before this procedure and had her psyche checked out. I still detest the surgeon for going through with this. Speaking about responsibility for the patient's health and well being etc...
|
05-01-12 03:22am
|
Reply
54
|
Beshine
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
Sorry, my comment is not related to your discussion of her name changing. After looking at her site I am still at a loss of words...My suggestion is to find the surgeon and inject him with saline until he explodes.
|
04-30-12 08:42am
|
Review
55
|
Rubber Tanja
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-updates are currently quite frequent (about once every 2-5 days)
-high definition videos (.f4v, 1920x1080), version for mobile devices (.flv), sreaming option
-the models are very pretty with nice firm bodies
-vast range of different fetish outfits and settings |
| Cons: |
-only 5 galleries with pretty old sets
-no model list or background infos whatsoever
-only one video format, streaming option shows the whole picture only in full screen mode (strange)
-videos are split into many parts, unfortunately the video names are just numbers which makes it impossible to find the matching parts afterwards
-plain site with not much to explore |
| Bottom Line: |
At first I was impressed by their humongous range of fetish wear they are using in the shoots. They obviously use made to measure catsuits which fit the models perfectly (and are pricey), bizarre suits like the doll suit with condoms for each orifice, realistic doll masks, masks with dental dams, piss masks, gas masks, nurse outfits etc. It's also nice to see some of the girls dress up in the suits (from naked to completely rubberized). The scenes are usually two or three girls licking or caressing each other or using dildoes or strapons. There are also two pissing scenes if I am not mistaken.
Up to here it's all fine and I am quite happy that I have seen these beautiful girls dress up and polish their hot bodies. But there are some downsides which piled up after watching the videos.
First of all the splitting of the videos is awful. It feels like they did it to manipulate the update schedule since it naturally leads to more frequent updates. And, as I said, the videos are numbered so you have to sort them carefully by hand. I have already mentioned that the models usually look gorgeous but I have some problems with the shoots. I will give some representative examples.
First, most of the licking scenes are exhausting for the viewer because the active woman (mostly) BARELY touches the pussy with her tongue which in turn produces pre-orgasmic noises from the other woman. I don't exaggerate here. In one scene I was on the verge of a heart attack watching a string of saliva going back and forth but the tongue never touching anything.
Second, the slowness...usually I like shoots which are sensous and build up the tension with some steamy ending but in some scenes you have the feeling the video runs in slow-motion and (which is most problematic) the climax is missing. There is this huge contradiction between the kinky settings and the relatively tame action. If I have a smoking hot girl in the most kinky rubber outfit which sucks on a strapon I want her to deep throat it and not just lick the tip and pretend it's her most exciting moment. If I have a piss mask I want to see all the piss going in and give the girl some trouble breathing and not dribble out mostly at the sides.
I really missed the element of exhausted and satisfied girls after an orgy of ecstatic flesh (or rubber) here. All the ingredients are there but they are not combined in the right way. I had no problem with this if they would have stayed softcore but doing it like this it's neither flesh or fowl. I don't really blame the girls which appear to be amateurs and not pros, so maybe it's just a consequence of their inexperience or shyness. Maybe I had the wrong expectations here.
In conclusion if you want to watch some awesome girls dressing up in slick rubber and don't care if the action is limited and there are nearly no galleries or options this site could be for you. Since the site is very young it may turn out to be really great in the future. With these girls at hand I surely hope so. Until then I think "might recommend" is a fair rating. |
|
04-29-12 12:40pm
Replies (8)
|
Reply
56
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Yeah, it's probably like that. Anyway, it's cheaper than before, but unfairly distributed over the world.
|
04-26-12 11:51pm
|
Reply
57
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
No. The only underaged girls I got to see until now were Hentai and since it's no real person...I sometimes wonder though why the japanese are so obsessed with loli pictures. But OK, they also look at guro, so...
|
04-26-12 10:25am
|
Comment
58
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
04-26-12 10:19am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
59
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Oh, thanks, really appreciate the info!
|
04-25-12 12:08am
|
Comment
60
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
|
04-24-12 01:55pm
Replies (6)
|
Reply
61
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Maybe the movies are some sort of "making of" from the shootings? I think one should join Hegre for the photos though, the movies are only a bonus.
|
04-23-12 04:57am
|
Reply
62
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
I will make a suggestion for such lists on PU and will be the first to participate, no problem. Seriously, has there ever been such a suggestion?
|
04-23-12 03:04am
|
Reply
63
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
The "substantial number of people" is the problem (and OK, this is the result of the attitude). I would happily boycott MetArt if I knew a substantial amount of users would do the same. There should be a list with participants and if the number goes up to a reasonable amount it would have the desired effect.
|
04-23-12 01:18am
|
Reply
64
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I really doubt it will change their pricing scheme if I join or not. Just like I wonn't save the planet if I turn my lights out overnight.
|
04-22-12 11:45pm
|
Reply
65
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Maybe it's like you said it is but I think you underestimate the society and its influence on the individual's decisions. Even if one is unaware of it.
|
04-22-12 05:28am
|
Reply
66
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Poll
I am happy to see my suggestion for a poll. To clarify the point "Maiming the concept of love", I was struggling to get the expression in the way I wanted it to appear (and this one is also meant ironically of course). I wanted to give a choice for differentiation here between social and sexual monogamy. Although most people see these concepts intrinsically linked to each other, they are not. So the number one reason for most people to say that someone is unable to be socially monogamous is sexual promiscuity. Social standards don't allow one to follow this combination. My point for this 4th option was, however, that (from my point of view) the level of commitment and trust one puts into his relationships should be viewed independently from his promiscuity. There are different levels of "love" and they shouldn't be discarded by social standards. I found a citation in an article which expresses my thoughts on this topic quite well:
"While monogamy is the perfect form of social organization, its pressure is eliminating all other options and putting aside the persons that are not capable of it and want to experiment other life styles."
http://hugocrispim.suite101.com/monogamo...ial-monogamy-a324570
So I polled for point four. Makes the most sense to me. There is so much love going around, I wouldn't want it restricted just by social standards or stigmata.
|
04-22-12 03:21am
|
Reply
67
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Hmm, converting 19,97€ to $ it's about 26$. It's a little bit cheaper than before, but not much though. It sucks that one has to be so attentive to the currency. So it's still the same. Living in the US, join, living in Europe don't.
|
04-22-12 12:12am
|
Reply
68
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Comment
"Well, fine, great for US-citizens.....across the Atlantic it's still regional pricing, so that offer means about $28....."
Maybe check again. When I tried, it said 19.97€/month. I am seriously considering to join again.
|
04-21-12 01:56pm
|
Reply
69
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
Thanks for the review. I can follow your score after the points mentioned. Said that I would not even give Abby Winters more than 70 points.
|
04-21-12 04:53am
|
Reply
70
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
gyang79's Reply
I get it that everyone has his own views of beauty, but by all fair means finding the women of Metart that repugnant? And where comes the following from?
"If you like women that look like they have been starved nearly to death then thats you"
In what possible way on holy mother's earth are the models there "nearly starved to death"? I was making an "effort" here and dug out my MetArt folder and skimmed through a bunch of galleries and couldn't find a single model which can be suspected of bulimia. Anyway I don't want to argue that much anymore.
But I really want to know, did you subscribe to FTV and are you satisfied there? Just curious.
|
04-18-12 07:53am
|
Reply
71
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
gyang79's Comment
Your comment has some flaws:
1. East european models are the most beautiful women there are and they don't look the same, maybe look closer.
2. The human body has only a limited number of poses. What do you expect? If you apply this criterion the galleries would turn into boring after the 3rd set or so.
3. Blank stares??? Maybe you joined the wrong site.
4. MetArt has the most diversified shooting locations one can think of.
I admit that the newer sets are all glamour and polished, not like the old sets from 2002-200x but they are still worthwile. It sounds like a rant here but I think you are just pissed that you joined and did not get what you wanted but from their previews it should have been pretty clear to you what to expect. I am just puzzled from your reaction.
|
04-16-12 03:11pm
|
Reply
72
|
Fetish Bunker
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Nope.
|
04-14-12 12:03am
|
Reply
73
|
Fetish Bunker
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
You are right. I didn't intend to push them into the shady area. They did some awesome work there and I had even some contact via email with them a while ago. It's really painful to see the site age with no activity whatsoever.
|
04-13-12 12:08pm
|
Comment
74
|
Fetish Bunker
(0)
|
|
04-12-12 09:39am
Replies (4)
|
Review
75
|
Latex Veronica
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Previews for non members show absolutely all available galleries, 10 videos can be watched for about 1 minute each, that's nice
-The new galleries feature extensive and hot descriptions from Veronica with nice insights into her kinky mind, quite a turn on to read them
-All videos in HD, old ones 1280x720, new ones 1920x1080, currently a total of 30 vids available, running times vary between 7-30 min.
-Galleries have resolutions of 1067x1600, zip files for each gallery, average of 90 pics/gallery (varies from 40-160)
-Some guest galleries with 20 pics each (modest resolutions, no updates here), Ancilla Tilia, Bianca Beauchamp, Susan Wayland, Manuela from Rubbervita
-Some interactive content with votings for new shootings or outfits
-Plans to do custom videos?(it's announced on their main page) |
| Cons: |
-Only one video format (.wmv), no streaming, some videos contain music (maybe a pro or con, depends)
-Galleries could use a higher resolution, there was no change here since the site started
-Download speeds are rather modest
-Updates are coming slow (about one update in 2 weeks)
-Site has a very basic design
-No hardcore scenes (like at Rubber Passion for example) |
| Bottom Line: |
Since the site changed its name my old review got obsolete but at least this one is a chance to look at some improvements they made. I really liked it that they offer .zip files for the galleries now! As I remember I downloaded the old ones per hand and all the filenames where random with no order whatsoever. Also the new HD video format is quite nice. The rest is basically the same as before. You will see colourful and rubbery pictures of Veronica doing sports like skiing, diving, cycling and swimming. There are also nice sets with dressing scenes or applying shiny silicone oil on her suit. Most scenes are shot outdoors. Furthermore you get to see her wearing casual clothes over her latex suits which gives a sweet touch to it (the hiking gallery for example is quite adorable). The main focus lies on catsuits which is after my fancy. But there are also some slightly more kinky galleries like bondage and ballgags. The most recent one features a ballhood and bondage mittens which is always cool to look at. After all, the site didn't lose its original character and charm. Veronica is quite the rubber gal and it seems she is comfortable about doing her modeling in latex attire. The main shortcoming is (as usual) the slow update schedule. I quit some time ago and didn't miss really much since then. But the actual galleries are quite an eye-catcher. Because of their improvements I give a slightly higher rating than before (which was 75). |
|
04-05-12 02:54am
Replies (0)
|
