| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Rubber Tanja
(0)
|
Reply of
RubberTanja Co's Reply
I am really sorry for your loss due to copyrigth infringement but I will refrain from joining again and will support the general DRM boykott position of most of the PU community.
|
01-20-13 02:39am
|
Reply
2
|
Lovers In Latex
(0)
|
Reply of
lyncher's Comment
Just a suggestion. I wouldn't do a review and a comment on the same site at the same time. Mostly it is redundant and also too much work for you ;).
|
12-16-12 10:11am
|
Reply
3
|
Lovers In Latex
(0)
|
Reply of
lyncher's Review
Thanks for the review. I was tempted to join some time ago but didn't do it. What bothered me was (as mentioned in your review) that their preview pages didn't indicate recent updates and I felt that the perv factor was too low for me. And you are of course right concerning the subscription price. I feel that every site which claims to deliver "fetish" content reserves the right to skyrocket their prices, even if they are mediocre at best.
|
12-16-12 10:06am
|
Reply
4
|
Strapon Cum
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
OK, thanks for the heads up.
|
12-01-12 11:10am
|
Comment
5
|
Strapon Cum
(0)
|
|
11-30-12 03:27pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
6
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
If he didn't pay Clips4Sale directly he has a problem. Once I bought a clip which was extremely crappy and got my money back, but this was a regular clip...
|
11-30-12 03:17pm
|
Reply
7
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Actually the site I was posting has clips to buy, so it's no tube site. It's like Clips4Sale.
|
11-17-12 11:43am
|
Reply
8
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Khan, can you please give a reason for the tube exception? Just curious.
|
11-17-12 10:54am
|
Reply
9
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Concerning DVDs (but clinic stuff) the company Viola did some awesome stuff. But that's dated back in the 90's (of course it was VHS then).
Maybe try Rubber-Passion too? Lucy also does some f/m fucking but the action there is mostly solo or f/f.
|
11-17-12 10:52am
|
Reply
10
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
I am too a little bit disappointed by all the sites you mentioned. They are doing so, so and have great potential (that's the main thing which hurts me) but lack some aspects. I am not sure if I understood what you are searching for correctly (concerning bizarre+f/m or just latex f/m). My general experience is that if you start searching there is not much appealing out there (or it's all softcore or model sites). Perhaps I can recommend a tiny something:
"fetishkitsch.com":
It's a couple doing quite a lot of fucking in latex, so you have f/m. There is no clinic content here but some bondage, inflatables, masks etc.
"http://www.bpclips.com/0000094/rubber-fucking-c-1.html";
Rubber Fucking had its own site some time ago but degraded into a collection of clips from BP productions. The name speaks for itself. I have most of their clips and they are pretty decent. The downside is that there is just one guy banging the girls and the variety of women is limited to a small number. If you look around they have some other niches there like breathplay and that sort.
Quite frankly when it comes to hardcore and latex most of it is just garbage nowadays.
|
11-17-12 09:46am
|
Comment
11
|
The Rubber Clinic
(0)
|
|
11-03-12 02:41pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I sometimes send feedback but mostly to smaller sites where I think it has a chance to be heard and taken a little bit seriously.
|
11-02-12 12:23pm
|
Review
13
|
Zlata
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Zlata is a young and exuberant gal
she has a very athletic and flexible body, capable of extreme contortions
amount of current galleries are about 120 with an average of 168 pictures per gallery and a resolution of 1500x1000
66 videos (.wmv) with the newer ones having a resolution of 1920x1080
archive contains about 155 galleries with resolutions around 614x819
search categories include contortion categories (backbend, frontbend, split...) and fetish types (bodypainting, bondage, nylon, latex, feet...)
three updates per week (effectively one update containing a video or picture gallery and two updates in the archive and her diary) |
| Cons: |
strictly softcore sets (nipples and crotch are taped if the clothing is too transparent)
except from some default search terms there is no tagging system or a search box
no .zips for the galleries
archive galleries are dated inconsequently which makes archiving and sorting a mess, there is no real chance to find out the actual chronological order here
you don't have access to the network sites, like absoluteskinny.com, spandexbabe.com, sweet-ballerina.com or rubber-models.com |
| Bottom Line: |
I've been around this site many times in the past few years and never got bored with their content. The variety of Zlata's posing in every setting imaginable is always exciting and the quality of their shoots had a high standard from their beginning at around 2002 until now. There are many pictures which I would love to frame and hang them on my walls if I had the space.
It's interesting to compare the older sets with a barely legal teenager Zlata and the current ones where she has grown into a sexy young woman (and kept her original flexibilty which I find pretty amazing).
Though I would say Zlata.de is a site concentrating on photography one should not neglect the videos. Watching Zlata bend in her various sexy outfits, be it in the desert, on tropical islands or even underwater is impressive.
As I mentioned in the Cons if one is an archive freak there are some shortcomings with rotated out content (no .zips) and the inconsequent naming pattern. I myself have a big deal of work now because I have many double galleries which were renamed in the meantime an I downloaded again.
My bottomline is a big recommendation for everybody to join this site if he is only remotely interested in contortion, fetish outfits and photography. Maybe it's like comparing apples and oranges here but (from my point of view) Zlata has kept the joy for experiments and fresh ideas alive which I currently miss over at MetArt.
My final score is based on the premises the site has to fulfil in its own right. It's not a general score because of the special nature of the site (if anything of that makes sense). |
|
11-01-12 10:10am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
14
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I think it is difficult for them to include such sets because of their massive update schedule. I don't want to beef here. MetArt is still the best site concerning nude photography. Femjoy is also sort of cool. Was a member there for some months. They are rather on the full naked side but I also like to see some lingerie so MetArt is still my favorite.
|
10-19-12 01:35pm
|
Comment
15
|
Rubber Tanja
(0)
|
|
10-19-12 01:28pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
16
|
Insex Archives
(0)
|
|
10-19-12 10:37am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
17
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
MetArt is the kind of site you can easily get lost archiving ad infinitum and forget to enjoy the pictures because their content is so huge. Do they make efforts to bring back some more artsy shoots like from Ronin back in the days? I would love to see some more of this kind.
|
10-19-12 09:58am
|
Reply
18
|
Rubber Passion
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
DRM is probably still around. At the bottom of the signup page it says:
"Please note: Downloads are only viewable on Windows Media Player. If you have a Mac this is only possible if you have a partition on your hard drive that allows for Windows."
So, if you can only view the clips exclusively on WMP, it is because of the verification which doesn't work with VLC or other players...it's a shame because she has added some nice clips and galleries lately.
|
09-16-12 11:09am
|
Comment
19
|
Erotic Anime
(0)
|
|
09-11-12 11:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
20
|
Lovers In Latex
(0)
|
|
09-09-12 01:14am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
21
|
Lesbea
(0)
|
Reply of
monty2222's Review
Nice review. It's a shame they don't offer preview videos and only just one shot from each photoset in non native resolution...Oh wait there are some preview vids, sorry.
|
08-11-12 12:50am
|
Reply
22
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
Considering you have six cons against four pros I don't get the 95 rating. Also I don't understand the implication of:
"Tough site to do a review for because there's so much variety. PU really isn't set up to do this - So I'm doing the best I can with the tools I have." Just some points I noticed, nothing to get upset about.
|
08-01-12 12:01am
|
Reply
23
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
Reply of
humiliatrix's Reply
You realize that their reviews are extremely biased and they don't give solid pro and contra points? I have no problem with that but such reviews are rather useless.
|
07-01-12 11:11am
|
Reply
24
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Out of fun I chose the Prime Time, but seriously, I have no idea. I fear that the vids will take a more dominant role because of the availability of huge flatscreens, 3D, etc. And if they figure out more about the brain some implant jacks for the head with virtual cybersex streaming and that sort. That's where you will have to be careful about starving to death in your chair while being fucked 24/7 though.
|
06-30-12 12:44am
|
Reply
25
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
Keep it up's Comment
I agree with the above two comments. Don't be hasty and cancel your credit card yet. That's the last resort.
|
06-30-12 12:33am
|
