| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I think it is difficult for them to include such sets because of their massive update schedule. I don't want to beef here. MetArt is still the best site concerning nude photography. Femjoy is also sort of cool. Was a member there for some months. They are rather on the full naked side but I also like to see some lingerie so MetArt is still my favorite.
|
10-19-12 01:35pm
|
Reply
102
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
MetArt is the kind of site you can easily get lost archiving ad infinitum and forget to enjoy the pictures because their content is so huge. Do they make efforts to bring back some more artsy shoots like from Ronin back in the days? I would love to see some more of this kind.
|
10-19-12 09:58am
|
Reply
103
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Yeah, it's probably like that. Anyway, it's cheaper than before, but unfairly distributed over the world.
|
04-26-12 11:51pm
|
Comment
104
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
04-26-12 10:19am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
105
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
I will make a suggestion for such lists on PU and will be the first to participate, no problem. Seriously, has there ever been such a suggestion?
|
04-23-12 03:04am
|
Reply
106
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
The "substantial number of people" is the problem (and OK, this is the result of the attitude). I would happily boycott MetArt if I knew a substantial amount of users would do the same. There should be a list with participants and if the number goes up to a reasonable amount it would have the desired effect.
|
04-23-12 01:18am
|
Reply
107
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I really doubt it will change their pricing scheme if I join or not. Just like I wonn't save the planet if I turn my lights out overnight.
|
04-22-12 11:45pm
|
Reply
108
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Hmm, converting 19,97€ to $ it's about 26$. It's a little bit cheaper than before, but not much though. It sucks that one has to be so attentive to the currency. So it's still the same. Living in the US, join, living in Europe don't.
|
04-22-12 12:12am
|
Reply
109
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Comment
"Well, fine, great for US-citizens.....across the Atlantic it's still regional pricing, so that offer means about $28....."
Maybe check again. When I tried, it said 19.97€/month. I am seriously considering to join again.
|
04-21-12 01:56pm
|
Reply
110
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
gyang79's Reply
I get it that everyone has his own views of beauty, but by all fair means finding the women of Metart that repugnant? And where comes the following from?
"If you like women that look like they have been starved nearly to death then thats you"
In what possible way on holy mother's earth are the models there "nearly starved to death"? I was making an "effort" here and dug out my MetArt folder and skimmed through a bunch of galleries and couldn't find a single model which can be suspected of bulimia. Anyway I don't want to argue that much anymore.
But I really want to know, did you subscribe to FTV and are you satisfied there? Just curious.
|
04-18-12 07:53am
|
Reply
111
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
gyang79's Comment
Your comment has some flaws:
1. East european models are the most beautiful women there are and they don't look the same, maybe look closer.
2. The human body has only a limited number of poses. What do you expect? If you apply this criterion the galleries would turn into boring after the 3rd set or so.
3. Blank stares??? Maybe you joined the wrong site.
4. MetArt has the most diversified shooting locations one can think of.
I admit that the newer sets are all glamour and polished, not like the old sets from 2002-200x but they are still worthwile. It sounds like a rant here but I think you are just pissed that you joined and did not get what you wanted but from their previews it should have been pretty clear to you what to expect. I am just puzzled from your reaction.
|
04-16-12 03:11pm
|
Reply
112
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Yeah, I also agree on the animals topic. Even if the girl is totally naked it's not totally awkward or disturbing if there is a cat or dog in the room. There is also this nice thing where girls are riding buck naked on a horse without a saddle but I don't know if it's ever been the case at MetArt.
One point which maybe interesting to others is that the most creative and experimental photography can be found in the time between 2000-2003. The pictures of Ronin etc. are outstanding. I think they lost some creativity in the last few years but how many intelligent variations can there be considering their 1 Gazillion galleries?
|
01-10-12 10:20am
|
Comment
113
|
Mighty Mistress
(0)
|
|
06-25-11 04:38am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
114
|
Mistress Jennifer
(0)
|
|
03-03-12 12:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
115
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
I joined this site about two weeks ago, so maybe I have not the complete perspective...
But what immediately attracted my attention was the bad camera handling in most of the videos. Sometimes it feels like you are on a rollercoaster when the camera is shifted to a different position and you can always hear some weird creaking of the camera support.
Just an observation...
After all the site's not bad (I am more the gallery freak, not the video type) but definitely not a 95 for me.
|
03-22-09 03:58am
|
Reply
116
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Thank you for this nice review.
Concerning the shortcoming of HD videos you are right. I am honestly asking myself why they make this much advertisement for HD if they don't keep their promises.
Concerning the photoshoot style videos, this is in fact a style which I like very much. At Latexotica.com they sell DVDs of their shootings and I bought a lot of them :).
One comment at the softcore nature of this site. It's in fact a great turn on for some people to look at high res pix of pantyhose clad asses or high heels etc. (btw you should have stressed that there are really high high res pictures on OT, sometimes too high for my taste). I forgot who said it but it's the "hidden" skin which enhances the eroticism and ones fantasy so it's understandable why there is so much lingerie out there ;).
|
04-17-09 12:38pm
|
Comment
117
|
Quality Control
(0)
|
|
05-13-12 10:43am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
118
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
lostdutchman's Review
It is interesting to get to know your (bad) experience with this site. But you should have posted this under comments. That's not a review.
|
10-02-10 02:29am
|
Reply
119
|
Riding Boots
(0)
|
Reply of
UKInet Media Lt's Reply
Oh, OK, that's nice! But you should mark them accordingly. I was clicking away on all the "not first row" pictures and always forwarded to your join page. I know many other sites which have the same strategy and it's just annoying. Would it hurt to change the whole preview page into clickable full size pictures (would be 20 instead of 5 then)?
|
05-04-12 10:26am
|
Comment
120
|
Riding Boots
(0)
|
|
05-04-12 12:44am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
121
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Actually the site I was posting has clips to buy, so it's no tube site. It's like Clips4Sale.
|
11-17-12 11:43am
|
Reply
122
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Khan, can you please give a reason for the tube exception? Just curious.
|
11-17-12 10:54am
|
Reply
123
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Concerning DVDs (but clinic stuff) the company Viola did some awesome stuff. But that's dated back in the 90's (of course it was VHS then).
Maybe try Rubber-Passion too? Lucy also does some f/m fucking but the action there is mostly solo or f/f.
|
11-17-12 10:52am
|
Reply
124
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
I am too a little bit disappointed by all the sites you mentioned. They are doing so, so and have great potential (that's the main thing which hurts me) but lack some aspects. I am not sure if I understood what you are searching for correctly (concerning bizarre+f/m or just latex f/m). My general experience is that if you start searching there is not much appealing out there (or it's all softcore or model sites). Perhaps I can recommend a tiny something:
"fetishkitsch.com":
It's a couple doing quite a lot of fucking in latex, so you have f/m. There is no clinic content here but some bondage, inflatables, masks etc.
"http://www.bpclips.com/0000094/rubber-fucking-c-1.html";
Rubber Fucking had its own site some time ago but degraded into a collection of clips from BP productions. The name speaks for itself. I have most of their clips and they are pretty decent. The downside is that there is just one guy banging the girls and the variety of women is limited to a small number. If you look around they have some other niches there like breathplay and that sort.
Quite frankly when it comes to hardcore and latex most of it is just garbage nowadays.
|
11-17-12 09:46am
|
Reply
125
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Reply
Compared to Rubberdoll, Eva's site is angelic! Not to be harsh again, but I always disliked Rubberdoll's site. Talking about boring shootings and lifeless scenes they would win a prize. But I see where this is going, so I will stop here ;-).
|
05-16-12 05:42am
|
