| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
Ben Dover
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
If you join up then be prepared to download all the site content and browse through it.
|
01-29-12 11:59am
|
Reply
277
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It really all depends, my tastes include ladies from a range of ages though most are in their (early) twenties
|
01-29-12 11:54am
|
Review
278
|
Ben Dover
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Original exclusive full-length content.
720x540 or 720x576 2.2Mbps WMV video so good quality.
Some very attractive girls.
Regular updates.
Easy to use site. |
| Cons: |
Very expensive for not a huge amount of content.
The storyline leading up to the action is sometimes far too long.
Very basic navigation.
No screencaps from the clip - the trailer clips (where available) show the first 4-5 mins of the clip so are useless for getting an overview of the scene so it's difficult to decide whether or not to DL. How much extra effort would a few screencaps take?
Some girls not exactly model quality, but obviously this is my personal taste and opinion.
Some of the videos are 5.4Mbps bitrate which is more than twice as much as required for the video size, and just makes for an unnecessarily bigger file - still, better than being too low a bitrate I guess.
Updates only weekly. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is basically a reality site where Brit-cheeky-chappie Ben Dover chats to a girl and charms her into coming to his studio for a bit of hardcore sex with one (or sometimes more) his mates. Girls sometimes wearing sexy lingerie and stockings.
There are a few international porn stars and European girls but mostly British girls, including a few Indian and black ladies.
Some very hot scenes, esp. Alex, Sarah and Amber, and Christina.
Typical hardcore scenes with some anal and few DP, even a few pissing scenes.
Videos mostly finish with cum on the girl's face though some end cumming on pussy and ass - no creampie that I could see though.
Don't think I'd sign up again as there's too little on offer for too much money and the lack of info such as screencaps on each scene does put me right off. |
|
11-01-11 06:39am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
279
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
To be honest, I'd like to sort out what DL'ed content I really like, stash it on a dedicated external hard drive and keep the PC mostly free of porn, with the occasional look at my stash as the need arises - a lot of new stuff I look at now isn't that great these days
|
10-18-11 12:50am
|
Reply
280
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
SexCliche's Review
Thanks for the review, I was a member quite a while back and noticed that the content was the same as peternorth.com which I joined more recently.
Agree with everyhting you say, it is a good site.
|
10-12-11 11:09pm
|
Reply
281
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gggfan's Poll
Eastern European girls geerally do seem to have the edge on beauty but there are a few UK and US hotties, though I tend to find they're less naturally-endowed (fake boobs, work done here and there etc) than the Euro babes.
|
10-02-11 01:56am
|
Reply
282
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
For me it was 1, 2 and 4
Girlfriend found a gangbang site in my browser history, my laptop's hard drive crashed and lost all my files (long long time ago) and I did manage to delete the wrong files but luckily recovered most of them.
|
09-29-11 03:41pm
|
Reply
283
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
I've just signed up for a two day trial which seems to allow full access to the site.
I'll add to the other replies to this review which I completely agree with. One thing that I noticed with some of the hi-def videos is that they're a little soft/fuzzy in places, probably because the 4k bitrate for the 1280x720 videos is somewhat insufficient - the videos would be improved with a 4800k-5000k bitrate. There does seem to be less content on this site compared with previous visits but that could just be my imagination, but it'd be nice if more of the old (small) content was recoded as 720p hi-def (assuming the original shoot was hi-def).
I'm unlikely to be joining this site again on a one month subscription.
|
09-26-11 08:56am
|
Comment
284
|
Hey Little Dick
(0)
|
|
09-21-11 02:26pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
285
|
Girls Abuse Guys
(0)
|
Reply of
StrapMe's Review
This site and Hey Little Dick are included in a subscription to PureCFNM
|
09-21-11 02:19pm
|
Review
286
|
Pure CFNM
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The premise of this site is groups of sexily-clothed females and one (or two) guy ending up geting stripped naked, with the girls wanking off the guy(s) and having a laugh at the guy whilst doing so, but some scenes feature blowjobs or full sex.
Attractive models, some wearing lingerie, some young, some a little older but all girls with sexy attitude, showing teasing bits of cleavage and legs/ass.
Decent video quality 856x480 and 3Mbps quality, but not HD.
Reasonable download speeds.
Easy to navigate.
Forums allow you to discuss content and suggest scenes - this is a great way of involving members.
Photo sets for each scene.
Includes membership of two other smaller sites, Girls Abuse Guys and Hey Little Dick.
Quite a bit of content - over 300 scenes. |
| Cons: |
Some video quality is quite poor at low 800kbps bitrate with interlacing, so much so, that in some parts of a video, the girl's hand wanking the cock can't be seen as it becomes a blur of horizontal lines. Some content is only at 512x290.
Expensive regional billing.
No search facility and very basic navigation.
Scenes are ordered according to date added.
Model list is not alphabetically indexed, making it more difficult to find a model, though scenes for a particular model are listed under her details.
Model info for the scene isn't hyperlinked and doesn't tally with the model index, e.g. one scene mentions Kelly as the actress but there is no such Kelly in the model index. |
| Bottom Line: |
Mostly handjobs in this site but a few BJs and full sex in some scenes.
The girls keep their clothes on but in some scenes they unbutton or remove their tops to reveal their breasts in a teasing way in order to get the guy to cum.
The guys are quite timid but one guy stands out as also being quite comical in his timidity.
If you enjoy the fantasy of a woman taking control and getting you off, then this site is for you. |
|
09-19-11 08:22am
Replies (2)
|
Review
287
|
Harsh Handjobs
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The theme of the content is ladies who are pissed off with the guy lying on the bed in front of them who decide to punish him by slapping and punching his cock whilst giving a handjob.
Reasons for being pissed off include her catching him watching porn, the girl who feels she isn't getting enough of his attention, he insults her appearance, etc etc.
Some very attractive girls, mostly British with an attitude which suits this site's theme.
Good download speeds.
Good quality 1280x720 video at 3+ Mbps bitrate.
Original and exclusive content.
Trial period provides full access but beware sell-ons to other sites that you must untick in the joining page. |
| Cons: |
No search facility - very basic navigation.
Some not so attractive girls, but that's my opinion and everyone has their own taste.
Limited content - didn't take me very long to search through all the content and settle on what I liked the most.
No PU discount and quite expensive, though 3 day trial is full-featured. |
| Bottom Line: |
Provides what is says - hand jobs with attitude from pissed-off girls, some young, some older, some wearing lingerie and stockings, some fully clothed, some naked, some topless, but all have attitude and give the cock a good slapping around until the guy cums and the girl is disgusted and walks off.
It's a good site though I'd like to have seen a bit of sucking too, but then I guess the site would then be a blowjob rather than a handjob site. |
|
09-19-11 07:48am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
288
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Depends on the woman - an old girlfriend of mine was so highly sexed that she'd masturbate a few times a day between relationships, I can attest that she had a voracious appetite for sex.
|
09-13-11 01:15pm
|
Reply
289
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I doubt they'd bother acting on any feedback unless it was the same issue reporting but many other customers
|
09-01-11 12:38pm
|
Reply
290
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Pics aren't so important to me these days but nice if they're zipped up for DL but not a dealbreaker for me
|
07-29-11 01:18pm
|
Reply
291
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
Your view is drawn more towards the left and top of any image so a bottom-right watermark or logo is less distracting. Or at least in my experience.
|
07-27-11 12:28am
|
Reply
292
|
N/A
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Unfortunately, I'm sure the average porn producer would include Scooby himself, and maybe even Scrappy Doo.
|
07-20-11 07:48am
|
Reply
293
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Doesn't really interest me, I joined an anime porn site over 10 years ago and I haven't looked at the DL'ed content since.
But having said that, I might watch a porn version of Scooby Doo with Daphne and Velma getting some action from the guys
|
07-19-11 11:38pm
|
Reply
294
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Given the number of sites offering hi-def video, yes, definitely value for money.
I'd like to see sites re-encoding some of their popular older content at higher resolutions/bit-rates, just to show they're serious about their customers.
|
07-11-11 11:44pm
|
Reply
295
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Difficult/impossible to buy anything else for reasonable money these days
|
07-05-11 12:19am
|
Reply
296
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've said Other because I'm not sure exactly what constitutes a thong, but I do favour these types of underwear: http://pimpandhost.com/album/1003695-uw.html
They cover enough to be alluring and also show off the lovely curves
|
06-30-11 09:06am
|
Reply
297
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
A good review, I've just joined and already exhausted the content that I'm interested in (my current tastes are a bit narrow), but the stuff I've DL'ed is hot.
Navigation is good and pretty thorough, you can browse by most view, most favorited, by most viewed, by girl's name and by date posted. There's also a search facility and each search/navigation type has a tag filter to narrow the search by genre. I did notice an issue with the tag filtering in that it didn't always work and returned 0 matches - I was a bit suspicious when the tag "sexy" yielded zero matches; the workaround is to just click on one of the other navigation tabs and then click on the tab you were on again.
As mentioned in the review, video quality is pretty good but not very hi-def clips, the maximum I found was 1280x720 but very few of those, most hi-def are around 640x480.
Overall a good site, esp. if you're into teacher/pupil and office sex, thogh I'd like to see more thigh-high stockings in the scenes. Good value too with the TBP discount.
|
06-24-11 09:15am
|
Reply
298
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Poll
My choice is a mix between no edits and cut/fade between positions. Sometimes the transition between positions can be awkward, especially where removal of clothing is concerned, but on the other hand, I do like seeing the girl sucking the cock, and then guiding it into her pussy or lowering herself onto it before riding it. Straight cuts between positions detract from the watchers involvement a little, I think.
|
06-13-11 09:07am
|
Reply
299
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It was years ago and it was stockings but they have to be the right colour (dark), the right height on the thighs and the legs can't be too skinny
|
06-07-11 04:41pm
|
Reply
300
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Most POV is a bit boring and needs to be interspersed with the shots of the overall action. The most innovative type of POV I've seen is from Upperclassvideo.com where scenes have more one POV, so you see the girl's face/front at the same time as you see her rear getting seen to.
|
05-22-11 03:58pm
|
