| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
326
|
Piss Bank
(0)
|
Reply of
artnoir's Reply
Thanks for the answers, they're what I figured but it was nice to hear them confirmed by a member. Looks like I'll be making a small deposit in this bank pretty soon. ; - )
|
08-25-10 02:04pm
|
Reply
327
|
Piss Bank
(0)
|
Reply of
artnoir's Review
I was thinking of joining this site this summer...and then I completely forgot the name! But now that someone has done a recent review, I have a couple of questions:
1.) Is there DRM on any of these videos? I couldn't tell from TBP or PU, or even their tour.
2.) What's the average length of videos, or are they of all sorts of different lengths?
Thanks, and also thanks for the review, artnoir.
|
08-24-10 04:20pm
|
Reply
328
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
You'll be waiting for a while then...'cause it's not going to happen! Do you really want us to go from thousands of users to just Drooler and me comparing tan lines (or in my case, sunburn lines) and which model does the best shave job?
|
08-20-10 09:02pm
|
Reply
329
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I hate them, they make my skin look terrible! : - O
Oh wait...on women they look fine.
|
08-19-10 03:49pm
|
Reply
330
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Lol; "Honey, does this look painful to you?" : - )
No, I have not, though I suppose it could serve as a helpful visual aid. "And as you can clearly see, sweetie, the woman in exhibit A is enjoying herself performing the act in question. So let's try it!"
|
08-11-10 09:05am
|
Reply
331
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
There are a lot of browsers out there, in multiple release versions, so to expect webmasters and mistresses to write their sites to support every single one of them seems to be asking a little much. But at least the newest versions of the most popular ones (yes, including IE) should be common sense.
By the way, if anyone actually reads this and just happens to run a site, I am currently using Firefox v3.6.8. Just putting it out there... ; - )
|
08-09-10 04:29pm
|
Reply
332
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I detest censorship, especially when it comes to porn. I'm not asking for the check but if a site has a problem showing me a few uncensored photos or videos to clue me in on to what they offer (or just get me to bite that carrot) then I have a problem becoming a member.
|
08-05-10 03:46am
|
Reply
333
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Well, if we're talking about female models it's very important to me, but the males...not so much (it's almost always shown whether or not they are "enjoying" themselves anyway).
I would like to believe most women I watch in porn are getting more than just a paycheck and a slap on the ass out of the deal, even if it's all just looks in the end.
|
08-03-10 01:37pm
|
Reply
334
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mistresskent's Poll
I'm saying "stock up on condoms and go" but I wouldn't want to be responsible for traumatizing my favorite model into leaving the business (or just boring her to death). I mean how's she going to react when she finds out a typical fan really is just a creepy pervert?!
Also I just noticed this poll was submitted by a webmistress...is she implying anything?
|
07-26-10 08:23pm
|
Reply
335
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
Sounds like you would only agree if it was just a rehearsal, though I'm betting they don't do it much in porn. ; - )
|
07-26-10 08:16pm
|
Reply
336
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Hey, me too! If nothing else this site is great for expanding your vocabulary.
|
07-16-10 03:09am
|
Reply
337
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
My computer monitor is widescreen so that's what I prefer, though not require, but that means the videos have to be either recorded in HD (usually only very new stuff) or were digitized from film (in other words, almost never). I would prefer that all new videos be recorded in HD since the technology is so widely available now, but it's not a requirement.
|
07-14-10 04:56am
|
Reply
338
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
He he, don't worry, you're not a creepo just a human being with natural thoughts and feelings (including guilt, apparently). But what's worse, hiding your filth collection or hiding your "contraband"? I think either way if you died and a family member was going through your things there would be the inevitable "Oh, dear..." moment of embarrassment as they quietly headed to the the nearest dumpster. Plus, it's one more thing to worry about every time you move--talk about sensitive items! : - 0
I wonder how women feel about their toy contraband? I guess in their case it's a little more understandable since a hand and a couple of paper towels are not always enough for a little quick relief. Then again there are some creative and crazy sex toy designs out there just for female pleasure but the end result should still be the same, right?
|
07-13-10 03:53pm
|
Reply
339
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, definitely. Without corrective eyewear I'm practically blind so I am trying to get as much girl "watching" in as I can before I go totally blind. Though I am sure people would claim that if I stopped a few things I won't go blind...
I also get a kick out of catching other guys be far, far less subtle in their ogling than myself--hilarious, and it makes me feel like a real gentleman (though I am anything but)!
|
07-07-10 03:27pm
|
Reply
340
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Of course not. : - )
|
07-04-10 07:27pm
|
Reply
341
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
If I read a review it's more to figure out what the movie's about rather than whether it's any good or not, and I'd expect many read them for similar reasons. Plus, a lot of critics' tastes are, well, not that popular to begin with; they swoon over artsy independent foreign films that play in only a handful of theaters in the entire country, but dismiss popcorn features that go on to break sales records.
I will say in their defense that the ones who review for more mainstream news outlets tend to drop the whole if-your-a-parent act. Nothing I hate more than to read a review that sounds as if young children are the norm for what a film should contain.
|
07-02-10 05:16pm
|
Reply
342
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Wouldn't the price of Coca-Cola go up, since they have to pay for all that promotion? Considering they are the planet's most ubiquitous brand I would imagine they spend a pretty penny to maintain their lead in the market.
|
06-24-10 02:55pm
|
Reply
343
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I hate them, but if they are kept to just the welcome/opening page then it's okay, or for a sister site that's owned by the same company, but otherwise I get pissed since I have paid for the site, not advertising.
|
06-24-10 02:52pm
|
Reply
344
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, way too much. Sorry, but I can't keep my big mouth/word processor shut.
|
06-18-10 08:32pm
|
Reply
345
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks, that answers my curiosity perfectly!
Yeah, I should have specified girl-girl or girls-only hardcore, not boy-girl hardcore--which I am not very interested in--and this site sounds like it fits that bill really well (or fit on a future credit card really well...). Can't wait to be a member, and thanks again for responding.
|
06-17-10 12:22pm
|
Reply
346
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Exotics, I know it's been more than six months since your review but you're the latest actual reviewer, so how soft or hard is this site exactly? I was wondering because Cap'n made some comments about it being listed under softcore when it looks to be more explicit than that.
I'm just curious because I don't like stripping and posing--it's just too boring for me--so anything you can remember would help, thanks!
|
06-16-10 06:37pm
|
Reply
347
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
It's all about consent for me; how 'rough' or 'abusive' something is comes secondary to whether or not a person even wants it (both giving and receiving). I'm certainly willing to give--well, try at least, I'm a humanist and not very much into hurting others--if there is a person who is willing to receive and enjoys it.
Porn is obviously different; it's fantasy and we assume that it's completely consensual as well so we shouldn't feel too guilty about more "abusive acts."
|
06-16-10 12:25pm
|
Reply
348
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Sorry I missed your review when you posted it the other day. Man, what a score--a healthy 95! Though I would argue if a few sites should be in the 90s this could be one of them (okay, I gave it an 87, but I'm a frugal bastard and I'm a stickler for low pricing). I do think you get what you pay for though, even if you spend half your membership trying to recover from your hot girl-high after first joining. I can't say this has universal appeal but it has a little something for nearly everyone into basic girl-only porn; softcore posing, girl-girl, big butts/lips/smiles/cracks, to a kind of up close nastiness that would make Larry Flynt blush (in envy).
Great review!
(And I am pretty sure you meant to say you would fill your hard disk not "desk"? I think if anything this sight would make you fill your desk with spare tissues and paper towels... ; - ) )
|
06-15-10 12:49pm
|
Reply
349
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Lol! I bet you would volunteer! I wonder if it could ever be considered community service, because if it's on the Internet it serves the global community...of loyal perverts. : - )
|
06-15-10 12:38pm
|
Reply
350
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Several times a week is "frequent" enough for me. Hey, even pornographers need the weekend off. : - )
|
06-14-10 10:51am
|
