I've heard of a number of guys who like to keep some in the tank so that afterwards they can flush the pipes, so to speak, normally when they get to a working bathroom of course. And I've even read, as an actual recommendation from doctors, that women should urinate fairly soon after sex as a way to help avoid urinary tract infections. (Depends on the individual woman and her susceptibility to UTIs, and again this is in a toilet, not the bed/couch/backseat of your car!) I guess sex really is dirty...
Here's a quote from the Mayo Clinic's site, so you don't think I'm making this up and then you all vote to have Khan send me off to the crazy house for good! From Mayo Clinic: "Take these steps to reduce your risk of urinary tract infections:[...]Empty your bladder soon after intercourse."
This whole time all these porn girls were just trying to stay healthy, not fulfill some screwball fantasy! (That's my excuse for watching it--health and well-being...)
Pee videos probably have fewer health problems than any comparable anal video, or any hardcore video period (ignoring the mental and psychological issues some viewers seem to believe go along with golden showers). Bottom line, porn talent can get plenty sick without a drop of urine involved, and psychological fuckups can start way earlier too.
I mean when's the last time we ever heard of a urinary tract infection scare from the San Fernando Valley? : - 0
To be perfectly honest, I have never given it much thought, and no I'm not some cold-hearted miscreant who tortures animals or ties up women (plus I'm pretty bad with knots).
I think it's largely a part of the act, and behind the scenes it could all be fine and dandy...but I don't know, and frankly I don't want to know. I don't want to know that some girl has a kid, her marital status, her religion, or that she's really just a doe-eyed innocent who only talks like a drunken sailor on camera.
Call it method acting (though "acting" may be a stretch in this context), a professional demeanor, a naughty side, whatever, but I think it's way too easy to confuse what we see on camera as the whole truth. Yes, there are countless dickheads who have little to no respect for the people on camera, but that doesn't mean every bit of verbal abuse is genuine or even all that unexpected by the respective participants.
Some girls really get into it, frequently making it sound fucking hot, sometimes funny, and occasionally insincere and silly. But come on, it's porn, not a documentary or family movie!
No, neither past or present friends nor past or present girlfriends (granted, not a lot of those to come across).
To be honest I'm kind of glad though. I don't want to watch someone and dwell on what could have been. What would be worse than to watch a former girlfriend perform a hardcore scene that she never would have even agreed to do with you?
Can you blame her? It gets hot there, or maybe those were her work clothes.
I guess the tax rates are a sort of in-the-vicinity-of-porn add-on for living in CA. Nothing in life is free--not even spotting porn stars at your local supermarket (though it probably makes shopping a lot of fun). :-(
But what about the social conservatives you don't know? Didn't Bush II go a lot further than just trying to stop child porn with his Obscenity Prosecution Task Force?
I'd like to think that most anti-porn efforts are superficial--just window dressing to win over self-proclaimed moralist voters--but when they are actually dragging porn producers into court I think there's a problem. I find it ironic that the U.S., with arguably the most legally protected freedoms in the industrialized world, still seems to have a lot of problems with making hardcore porn.
And in terms of the web, since the president supposedly has a "kill switch" to it, will there be limits and laws on who can use what kind of domains? ".mil" and ".gov" are already restricted (though for pretty obvious reasons), would this be extended to our particular pursuit of happiness as well?
Love Firefox on my Mac, as it has all the options in looks, add-ons, and controls that I want/need. I'm generally dissatisfied with Safari, Opera, and Chrome, which all feel like they have too few user controls in the endless pursuit of "simpler is better" (in this case it's not). And IE is almost a joke to me now, though I think you can still download a version for Macs.
Absolutely, as there is no age too young (but still legal!) that has yet to make me feel like a certifiably dirty old man. ;-)
That and of course the various things I really don't have much of a problem with--shaved, waxed, tattooed, and pierced? As long as there are hot women taking their clothes off, I say the more the merrier. (I guess this could all disappear and revert back in a few decades, with me screaming at the younger generations, "Damn you kids, in my day our porn models shaved everything all the time! Now get off my lawn!")
Sorry, but I'm not a member of either of the ALS sites right now. :-(
As I remember this was a pretty limited time offer, and I don't think I could get it once I had cancelled my ALSScan membership even with time left on my subscription. Try asking more current members if they know of this discount or anything similar.
No worries, I didn't even realize I had asked a question! :-)
I sort of knew the answer anyway as I think Alex had mentioned on ALS' blog that they wouldn't allow members to actually choose the models. I think we've also discussed it here in the reviews or in the forum somewhere that ALS doesn't do this, and basically no site lets its members make hiring decisions.
The only "voting" that goes on is in e-mail correspondence, and possibly sites like this as well, where a model is popular enough to come back for a second shoot. Of course, in ALS' case they can all come back!
Somewhat, I guess because my libido can be stronger than my desire to have sound finances. I guess we've all been there. : - )
I haven't joined in a while, but I seem to remember ALSScan using its own processor or some exclusive processor, and it's a very popular site here, so clearly it doesn't scare us away. Bottom line, if I really want access to a site, I'll take the risk, it certainly wouldn't be the first time. (I'm also don't have a wife to review the CC bill with, does that make a difference?)
Plus, you can always dispute charges with your card company, probably even more so if its from a website. Though a lengthy history of porn subscriptions you never disputed might not help...
I absolutely hate it, and because of this I almost never watch Japanese content...though occasionally I stop and rubberneck at the odd fisting/bukkake/impossible insertion video that their most perverted minds have worked tirelessly to create.
In a way the pixelation almost makes it look like all their porn is hardcore, though I know they're just trying to hide the pee-pee parts. And frankly given some of the stuff they have come up with, seeing people's naughty areas are probably the least disturbing thing to be seen. But when you start pixelating the faces, that's when it feels really weird, like you stumbled onto an illegal video or something! : - 0
Kinda makes me sad really. I think of Japan as a modern, industrialized nation, yet they can't stop pixelating naked people.
Since I'm part of the Mac cult I prefer MP4, or "Other" I guess, since the fairly common WMV format doesn't convert all at once (you can't skip through longer videos as soon as you open the file, it might take a few minutes).
This is why I prefer sites that offer multiple formats, from SD up to hi-res HD, since so many subscribers are PC users but that Apple users aren't left out. : - |
Like others here, discounts help somewhat, but frankly a site I've never joined before better have a lot more going for it than just a coupon. In fact most 1st time subscriptions I've started are completely independent of discounts--I find a site and eventually (or sometimes immediately...) I join it, and if I like it hopefully I'll get a rejoin discount.
This is true outside of porn too. I don't use a lot of coupons at stores, like when I'm grocery shopping, because they're almost always for shit I don't need/have any interest in. Otherwise I'd have built up a nice strategic reserve of tampons and allergy medications by now. And what the hell would I have ever done with those? Lure single women over to my home: "The party's in here ladies--free Tampax and Claritin for everyone!" (Terrible way to outfit a bachelor pad, if you ask me.) : - 0
That's pretty much true everywhere. Probably damn near every place on earth needs a sizable dog park nearby because a certain percentage of dog owners are never going to do the cleanup after the dog's done its deed.
When I think about it, I don't know if I really hate dogs so much as their shitty, can't-someone-else-do-it owners. Sorry, but I've never been chased, barked at, bitten, or had to clean a cat's "land mines" out of the yard.
Cats can also be in danger from people, particularly the ones that hate cats (why you would hate a cat is beyond me). Cats are pretty independent and good at taking care of themselves, but cars, wild animals, kids, and sadistic adults are some serious dangers.
I'm more partial to cats myself, but have yet to live in a home big enough for me to want to own one, since I would have to keep it indoors. Dogs are kind of nice, but I would hate walking them and carrying around their turds for half the walk.
If you've ever heard of the comedian Louis CK, he has a bit about the difficulties of having a dog and kids at the same time and how eventually the dog is going to die and really upset the kids. He says about bringing home a puppy, something like "Hey look everyone, we're all going to cry in a few years."
It's dark but funny, though dog lovers might not like to hear the whole thing.
Be careful, some small dogs are very high energy, maybe they're making up for their small size?
But I guess it ultimately depends on the individual animal--some are laid back and non-confrontational, others act like they just stepped out of Resident Evil (known for having murderous zombie Dobermans in nearly every game!).
Generally no, plus knowing that they could kick my ass isn't much of a turn on either, though for others I am sure it is.
A "toned" woman can be attractive, but when it's taken to the "ripped" look of a female bodybuilder, as I think the question is asking, I don't find it very attractive. A healthy woman should have a higher body fat percentage than a healthy man, so looking like a bodybuilder just doesn't do it for me.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
