Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I at least try and watch more but it rarely helps that much (maybe because everyone looks so happy in whatever porn I'm watching?), though it can help when I'm stressed out and/or pissed off.
|
04-06-11 12:26pm
|
Reply
277
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Great question.
I'm not really sure what "a reasonable amount" is but in my opinion I would generally say "No." Diversity seems to mean making a lot of sites and videos pretty plain, ethnically speaking. Thus you have your exclusively Asian, black, Latina, etc. sites. Even including more than one race seems to require labeling it interracial, though this is probably to gain a wider audience not a narrower one. Just seems so inconsequential to me.
I don't think people really care that much about it deep down--lust/love is usually pretty colorblind! In fact when I hear or see someone ranting and raving against someone or some group because or race or ethnicity my first reaction is to think he or she probably just needs to get laid. ; - )
|
04-04-11 02:40pm
|
Reply
278
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I hate those! I have never been able to block them either, so they just keep popping up.
|
03-17-11 11:34am
|
Reply
279
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
To be fair, he is "winning" because he has the porn come directly into his home--one of his, uh, girlfriends is a porn star.
Though he probably still has a healthy porn habit too.
|
03-14-11 12:56pm
|
Reply
280
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yote78's Reply
I agree; if you have an Internet connection then you pretty much have as much access to porn as the most depraved members of society do. I mean does anybody really feel the same way surfing for porn online as they did stealthily walking into an adult "boutique" or the better section of the local video store?
Even if few people admit to it in "polite" company (which just seems rude to me) I bet a lot more people regularly view porn than would ever admit. That and the craziness of all these fetishes, and even standard boy-girl hardcore, have all gone pretty extreme with the 'net which doesn't make for a very good conversation starter.
|
03-14-11 12:38pm
|
Reply
281
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm probably too young to give much perspective on what the stigmatization was a few decades ago (though many celebrities and even some politicians boasted of seeing "Deep Throat" in the theaters in the '70s), but I am American and sadly that means there are a wide range of things that are considered acceptable across different parts of the U.S.
For example, Texas has pretty strict laws against sex toys (okay, not porn, but related) but fairly loose guns laws, so is that stigmatization? (Interestingly, it was also a Texas anti-sodomy state law that was challenged and eventually struck down by the Supreme Court a few years ago, thus legalizing dirtier sex nationwide. Woo hoo!)
So...in San Francisco you probably won't be ostracized, but in a place like Salt Lake City it's probably best to keep it hush-hush.
We're Americans: we get off on war and violence but are disgusted by sex and nudity. Go figure. : - (
|
03-14-11 12:28pm
|
Reply
282
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I own and use a Mac, quite happily I might add, but I'm not a mindless follower. I don't have any interest in their phones, pads, monitors, etc. (do have a 5yr old iPod though, still works) and I wouldn't even think of owning them, much less lining up overnight to pay the buzz premium they seem to charge on brand new crap.
Sorry, not a gadget or specific OS whore, but most OSs seem to be perfectly fine for me...porn seems to "work" the same either way.
: - )
|
02-25-11 02:23pm
|
Reply
283
|
N/A
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Lol! I'm sure when you're with a girl half your age you can fire off a couple just as accidental discharges--though I wouldn't know because it'll still be a few years before a girl half my age is not 100% illegal--but I still seem to have a sensitive trigger! : - O
|
02-23-11 02:24pm
|
Reply
284
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Lol! Maybe they'll make a porn parody of that latest bender of Charlie's and Kacey will play herself. At least she was smart (or just plain greedy) enough to cash his check immediately.
I doubt you can actually buy love, though definitely sex. I think "love" in this context really means lust, which many mistake for true love. This sounds corny, but I don't think you can put a price on love, but it seems to be a rare commodity.
|
02-21-11 02:44pm
|
Reply
285
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I think in an off-camera and unheard capacity it could be fun and rewarding (or horrifying and demeaning, the porn world's your oyster) but on camera--no way!
I'm not sure if it's physically possible for me to be in shape, much less in a toned, tanned, and 'roided condition. I think working in a job where my coworkers have to spend their time either looking at my ass or maneuvering a camera next to it just isn't worth it. And if real life is any indicator I would probably be out of job once the women realized they never want to have sex with me again.
So...screenwriter, editor, director: yes! Actor, stunt double: no!
|
02-11-11 02:23pm
|
Reply
286
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Some of us are have more than enough to do just trying to keep ourselves aroused!
: - (
|
02-11-11 02:14pm
|
Reply
287
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Hate it--it makes me afraid to ever go into a public restroom! : - (
|
02-09-11 10:47am
|
Reply
288
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
"While I can live with hair now and then and even a landing strip, all assholes should be shaved clean! It is not that I am interested in see it, it just seems dirty when it is hairy as well. Perhaps this is just me..."
Totally agree here! Yes, they should absolutely shave them, hell, zap it with electrolysis so it never grows hair again!
My guess is it looks too close to that hairy man mess we all inevitably see (come on, admit it) when we watch hardcore scenes and it gets to a closeup. The stuff nightmares are made of...
|
02-01-11 11:29am
|
Reply
289
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, many--I know I definitely use too much brainpower thinking about it.
|
01-31-11 07:32pm
|
Reply
290
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Do you ever wonder why so many people seem to find human breast milk weird or gross but cow milk and cheese (most likely from a cow you'll never even meet!) as perfectly normal?
Though come to think of it I haven't met a woman who likes being milked--go figure. Damn, is it really this hard to just get some calcium in my diet?! : - (
|
01-26-11 09:44pm
|
Reply
291
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Over-eating, because it's the only vice or "addiction" that we celebrate so universally, and along with gambling it's the only one listed here that you can really dive into so deeply as a form of recreation.
Frankly, I think it's hypocritical the way we demonize some things as purely evil--weed, coke, porn, sex--while we shovel bioengineered garbage down our throats and call it lunch. I don't think we should outlaw junk food (how else would we know our medical marijuana is working?) but don't turn around and tell me it's perfectly harmless or somehow morally superior to whatever substance makes someone else's body feel good.
|
01-14-11 03:07am
|
Reply
292
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
If porn wins it's probably not a "hands-down" win. ; - )
|
01-14-11 02:56am
|
Reply
293
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not really, because unless they are backed up with specifics it makes reviewers sound like they're parroting market terms for the site.
And even if something really is in HD is it even interesting or shot well enough for me to care? Kinda like Michael Bay being one of the early supporters of Blu-Ray--if it's his movies I'm watching no format is going to be able to improve it.
|
01-02-11 09:05pm
|
Reply
294
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I should be finishing school this year...so hopefully I'll be joining less (if it was more it might mean that I have too much time on my hands).
|
12-31-10 12:16pm
|
Reply
295
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I don't consider myself "old" (or "'ol") though definitely dirty, so it's only a minor putdown. But pretty much all older males are dirty ol' men so it's not much of a putdown.
|
12-27-10 11:52am
|
Reply
296
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Lol! Also, see the 40-Year-Old Virgin.
"break your jaw" Hmm...I feel sorry for your girlfriend. : - (
|
12-21-10 04:22pm
|
Reply
297
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Whatever cup size I can fit in my hands! ; - )
I'd say a C would be a pretty good size though--not spine-straining huge, but not so small that she might end up feeling inadequate if I ever grow man-boobs (or "muscles"...).
|
12-14-10 02:28am
|
Reply
298
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I think I missed the point of the poll as I don't find food sexy. : - (
|
12-07-10 05:45pm
|
Reply
299
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I wouldn't force anyone to do anything with anyone that they weren't comfortable with...but I doubt I'd be married, engaged, or celibate if I was running such a site (plus I'd assume I wouldn't have time for such outside-of-work relationships).
|
12-03-10 01:39pm
|
Reply
300
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I'm sure for some that's the criterion. Most Playboy centerfolds could be considered fully nude even the photos are not explicit (and as long as jewelry doesn't count).
I believe R-rated films can show 100% naked fully nude but not "good parts" fully nude--no boners, no pink, no stink--and I'm sure the vast majority of directors don't even think of challenging that.
And it's also the difference between the artsy nude sites that so many like here at PU and the harder girls-only "good parts" ones.
|
12-01-10 11:54am
|