| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
776
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I prefer to pick my own.
My password embeds the subscription number and the biller (12345678cc, for example) so it's quickly retrievable and also passes most tests for "strength."
|
08-29-11 08:38am
|
Reply
777
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Sandstone's Reply
Thanks for the response. I've had similar experiences so it's good to know that it's being fixed.
21Sextury is a SUPERB site, by the way. Keep up the great work.
|
08-27-11 11:51am
|
Reply
778
|
Dancing Bear
(0)
|
Reply of
raffles's Review
Raffles is right with 65. It's not quite bad enough to fall in the 50's (that should be used for the total crapola sites) but it definitely has so little to offer even in the CFNM genre that it deserves no higher score.
I wasted the price of a Latte at Starbucks on the trial. Save your money! In The VIP is far better for good CFNM material...and you CAN download stuff from the In The VIP site!
|
08-27-11 09:22am
|
Reply
779
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
The price offered last summer was $74.95 for three months ($24.99 per month)renewable. The undiscounted price was $44.95 per month and the PU/TBP price was $29.95.
I was a continuous subscriber up to the point when my credit card expired. Rather than notify me so I could update the card, they just cancelled me. They said I could renew but only at the current rate.
The best price now is the PU/TBP price, available if you use the PU/TBP link, even though PU/TBP still shows the $44.95. If you're interested I suggest you join as soon as possible before these guys change the price again.
|
08-27-11 08:34am
|
Reply
780
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
That's an understatement.
The site is superb. In my opinion the two best sites on the web are DDFProd and 21Sextury.
My only beef is summarized in my earlier comment posted on July 31.
|
08-27-11 08:28am
|
Comment
781
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
|
08-26-11 10:52pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
782
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Back in the day when Danni Ashe ran her site she had the Boob Bowl on live during the Super Bowl. It was pretty much as you suggested with delicious mammaries bouncing all over the field.
I haven't been on that site in years (after the sale of the site by Danni) so I don't know if they still do that.
|
08-25-11 10:11am
|
Reply
783
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Pro Tennis, English Football (Soccer) and Dodger baseball. Not much else.
|
08-25-11 12:36am
|
Reply
784
|
Brandi Belle
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
The likely problem was that the "trial" was set up by a cross checked box when I signed up via Busty Adventures. While I used the TBP/PU link to access Busty Adventures, the signup process automatically signed me up for Brandi's site although I had no interest in doing so. Despite your warning about cross check, and despite the fact that I normally am very cautious about such things, I goofed this time and left the check in the box. Oh well.
So the difference was that the trial was not purchased through your link. Sorry for not pointing that out.
In any case getting the cancellation processed was a real adventure. The site offers an inactive support function that did not work at all. Fortunately they use Epoch as the processor so I cancelled successfully through Epoch.
|
08-22-11 10:19am
|
Comment
785
|
Mr Camel Toe
(0)
|
|
08-20-11 06:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
786
|
Brandi Belle
(0)
|
|
08-20-11 12:58pm
Replies (4)
|
Comment
787
|
Busty Adventures
(0)
|
|
08-20-11 12:22pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
788
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Also ditto. The best way to attract members from PU is to participate in the discussion.
Just the fact that the webmaster responded quickly and the high score review just posted have made me very interested in dropping a few bucks on this site.
|
08-20-11 10:49am
|
Reply
789
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I answered "Definitely." Same reasons already mentioned. But being adventuresome, if the price is right I'll occasionally still give a site with a screwed up preview just because I like the babe.
Deciding if the "price is right" is where I use the Supersized Big Mac
method. If the cost of a site is about what the price of a Supersized Big Mac is, I rationalize by paying for the site. It's better for my waistline and, who knows, I might catch a great site.
BTW, never happened. I've snagged a few good downloads but have never found a true sleeper this way.
|
08-20-11 10:45am
|
Reply
790
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Given the quality of the makeup job and her attire, I'm guessing she was on her way to a shoot nearby.
When she left the Starbucks, she was walking with two other babes (not nearly as attractive but also well made up) in the direction of a rather staid looking high rise office building. The Starbucks has a large parking area so I have a hunch there may be a studio buried somewhere in that building and they were killing time waiting for the stunt dick to arrive.
|
08-19-11 08:02am
|
Reply
791
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No, I haven't.
But living in Porn Valley (West San Fernando Valley in LA) I have had a number of porn star sightings. Two recent ones. Sophie Dee about a month ago in a parking lot at a mall(really strange girl with a "flitty" personality but still great boobs@@) and Memphis Monroe about a week ago at a Starbucks at about 10:30am. Memphis was fully made up and was wearing (barely) a very tiny pair of white shorts, a modest top with a loose fitting tied shirt over a tank top (that were effective at hiding her rack) and impossibly beautiful long legs in normal (not slutty) high heels. She's definitely still in the game, big time.
That's one of the few real benefits of living here and paying the ridiculously high taxes.
|
08-18-11 07:38am
|
Reply
792
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Most "social conservatives" I know really don't have any interest in anything like this. The only efforts in the USA in the last 20-30 years have been to limit children's access to porn but not to stop porn altogether.
As for the .xxx, if it's voluntary, I'm good with it. But making it mandatory would create a definitional nightmare. No one can conclusively define porn.
USSC Justice Potter Stewart in a 1964 decision:
"I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description ["hard-core pornography"]; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.”
— Justice Potter Stewart, concurring opinion in Jacobellis v. Ohio 378 U.S. 184 (1964), regarding possible obscenity in The Lovers.
|
08-14-11 11:16am
|
Reply
793
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Two:
FireFox because it's far better than any others.
IE because some sites require it.
|
08-12-11 01:06am
|
Reply
794
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
Good review and good observations that pretty much match mine.
I was a member of RK, Bang Bros and Brazzers at the same time at nice low monthly recurring rates. I bailed out on Reality Kings after going a month with no downloads at all; too many bogus boobies, too much ugly body art and, with the few scenes that look like good candidates for downloading (Euro Sex Parties), far too long with too much bullshit.
While I like a nicely turned out butt once in a while, the site seems to have too much focus on asses and not enough on real, natural fun bags and nicely turned out labias. I remember that the last scene I watched was 40 +/- minutes and it wasn't until 20 minutes or so in that we finally got to see a naked breast (it was nice, but all too briefly featured).
The score of 87 is very fair.
|
08-10-11 08:29am
|
Reply
795
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
By itself it does nothing for me. But when it develops into "heavy petting" and such it can be a good warm up to a hot scene.
|
08-10-11 08:16am
|
Reply
796
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Interesting question that caused me to reflect. I grew up way back when the only easily available porn consisted of magazines containing bare boobs and, in the racier magazines, airbrushed pubic areas. Esquire had discontinued its mild (even for then) celebration of the always appealing Esquire Girls about a decade before I got interested in girls.
Then when Playboy showed a modest touch of bush, my libido ramped up a lot.
Then Penthouse showed glimpses of labia and finally Larry Flynt finally cut the bullshit and gave us full on pussy exposure.
Then came the PussyCat Theatres (here in El Lay) and finally the nudie bars.
As I got older, the shock value of raw hardcore became much less and I started moving more toward appreciating the female form far more than the standard suck, fuck and jerk crap that prevails today. Give me a solo sensual strip tease with HD closeups of PTA* any day over the hairy ass of some tattooed scuzzbag blocking a view of a sweet pussy.
*Pussy, Tits & Ass
|
08-08-11 08:31am
|
Reply
797
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
rearadmiral, terrific review, as always. I'm giving serious thought to taking the plunge on a 3 month membership to ALS Scans, especially after reading your review of ALS Scans today. The site has been on the top of my bucket list for a long time; one reason is because it had good preview stuff on Andie Valentino. (She's not in the model list right now, which means I should jump in before others disappear.
I'm tiring of the suck, fuck and jerk stuff and want to return to my real interest, looking at superbly attractive models in professionally produced videos while enjoying themselves.
One question. Can you tell from the site if ALS Angels is still available at the $9.95 add-on price and if that deal is permanent with longer term memberships?
|
08-07-11 10:54pm
|
Reply
798
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Comment
Turboshaft, I'm giving serious thought to taking the plunge on a 3 month membership to ALSScans, especially after reading rearadmiral's review of ALSScans today.
The ALSScans site has been on my bucket list for years but I'm tiring of the suck, fuck and jerk stuff and want to return to my real interest, looking at superbly attractive models in professionally produced videos while enjoying themselves.
Can you tell from the site if ALSAngels is still available at the $9.95 add-on price and if that deal is permanent with longer term memberships?
|
08-07-11 09:57pm
|
Reply
799
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
My approach is a bit different. I'll never sign up for a multiple month deal for any site at any time without first signing up for a single test month.
I cancel after the month, even when I really like the site, to see if they will offer a "stay deal" at a lower price. I'd say about 50% of the time I can sign up for a monthly rate that is lower than a three month rate divided by 3.
MetArt has a unique approach that I went for. I signed up for a month at the regular rate. About three weeks in I checked out one of its promotional popups and was amazed to find that they would sell me a one year membership for $99 and would reduce the price for the amount I already paid for the monthly subscription.
While I'm primarily a video guy, I really like the quality of the photography and the babes so I grabbed the deal.
Where the "stay deal" doesn't happen, I'll occasionally take the plunge on a multi-month deal.
I did that with DDFProd at a deal ($74.95 for three months) then available on TBP/PU and was quite happy with the deal. I loved the site.
Then they pulled a stunt that really pissed me off. When the biller hit the automatic recurring renewal, it was just after the expiration date on my credit card so the charge was rejected. Rather than letting me know, they simply cancelled my membership. I became aware of the cancellation when I was blocked from logging in.
They told me that, if I wanted to restart my membership I would need to do so at the current rate, $44.95 per month.
Needless to say I simply said 4Q and moved on. I miss the site but not the lousy attitude about customer satisfaction these people displayed.
|
08-06-11 10:10am
|
Comment
800
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
|
08-06-11 09:46am
Replies (0)
|
