| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
751
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
While I want to check out PTA (Pussy Tits and Ass) on every chick, I am turned on by a great face on top of a great body...so I picked Face.
|
10-21-11 12:22am
|
Reply
752
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I missed that word "favourite." I changed my vote to "annual," which I've done only for the special sites.Where annuals are not available, I go for the longest available.
I've been a member of VideoBox for at least six straight years without interruption, for example.
|
10-19-11 11:29pm
|
Reply
753
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Poll
The real answer for me is not available; it varies depending on the content and volume of that content.
I always sign up for one month and will cancel a few days in. If I like the site I will re-up either for another month, or if it's a truly exceptional site (21sextury, for example) for a longer term.
|
10-19-11 12:35am
|
Reply
754
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
My guilt is only when I choose to watch porn rather than do other things that need doing...like today is the deadline for filing my 2010 income taxes...which I guess I'd better get started on today.
OK, one more check of MetArt, first then off we go.
|
10-17-11 09:23am
|
Reply
755
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Who cares? I prefer reading posts that are in normal upper/lower case but if someone chooses all caps, what's the harm?
Back in the day it was seen as SHOUTING or ANGER but now with those dinky teensie little devices it's hard enough just typing a message let alone worry about the cases.
|
10-11-11 10:30am
|
Reply
756
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
A site like 21Sextury that has an amazing amount of content and an even more amazing number of updates.AND that reduces its monthly charge as they do will keep me for a long time.
|
10-08-11 06:34pm
|
Reply
757
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gggfan's Poll
I voted hate it, not because I don't like creampies but I hate gangbangs. Bogus activity, can't check out the babes and generally not boner creating.
|
10-08-11 03:53pm
|
Reply
758
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I can't remember when I first saw babes in Esquire magazine (it had Vargas Girl cartoons and sexy ladies, but no bare nips I don't think). It was probably the early to mid fifties.
I saw the first "smoker" in 1964. ("Smoker" was the generic term for contraband grainy black & white 8 mm movie porn.) It featured some rather portly women giving some jokers a rather poorly done BJ and getting porked through totally wild bush. No pussy lips visible at all.)
|
09-26-11 10:40pm
|
Reply
759
|
Glamour Models Gone Bad
(0)
|
Reply of
The Collector's Review
I just joined again. Was a member several years ago and just got a tip brom a buddy about a chick on the site. So I did what we all do, I checked with TBP first.
When I saw the TBP price my reaction was mixed; Good - a price that I have no problem with. Bad - why so inexpensive.
I read your review then signed up about 10 minutes ago.
Immediate reaction-
-I cannot believe the rudimentary site design, but who cares if the content is good.
-I went to Anna Nova's page and my first download was a 54 meg video dated 2006. It was butt ugly at 320. The 2011 entry was a (barely) acceptable 640. A Brandy Talore video was a bit better at 700.
-The download speeds were fantastic. Even when I did 3 d/l's simultaneously (uing DTA) I got excellent speeds.
-The model list is loaded. Looking forward to spending some time going through the list.
-I have not checked out the network sites, but with Shay Laren Natalia Cruz, Chrissy Moran, etc. in the roster, the volume of content is amazing.
Your review was extremely helpful. Thanks a million.
|
09-26-11 09:19am
|
Reply
760
|
Nextdoor Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Drooler,
I just found this site and of course I immediately went to PU to see what has been said about it.
Yours is the only posting and it's 15 months old so I'd like to know if you've gone on the site recently. Their preview site looks good but has no info about how many videos are available. It also brags about 5 updates per week, but it also talks about "new model Mondays." Does that mean that the other four are recycled or are they new shoots of current models?
Thanks,
Jack
|
09-26-11 08:27am
|
Reply
761
|
Jerkoff Zone
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Impressive review.
When I first saw it I wondered why anyone would spend so much time reviewing a site with a 55 score until I read it. It's a fair warning, especially because the did a great job on the preview site.
It reminds me of the time many years ago (before PU) when I was jazzed up about Hustler having a website so I joined it. Awful. No. Worse than awful. And with DRM yet.
I've never even been tempted to try it again. Same deal here. JMP stuff at the store is good but this time rearadmiral has done an excellent job of explaining why this site isn't a good one to join.
|
09-24-11 09:07am
|
Reply
762
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Three answers:
No
Hell no
No fucking way
|
09-24-11 08:52am
|
Reply
763
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Looks very interesting. Two questions.
How frequently do they post updates?
Are they part of a network so if you sign up you can access other sites?
|
09-22-11 09:12am
|
Reply
764
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
In a weak moment dropped $99 for a one year subscription to Met Art.
I'm a video guy and MetArt is primarily a photo site, but I bit.
|
09-22-11 09:04am
|
Reply
765
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
CT - I really like your new review format. Gets right to the point without a lot of unnecessary verbiage.
As for Twistys I would like them to add two things to their search engine - 1) hard core/soft core/midcore and 2) natural vs enhanced (bogus) boobies.
|
09-18-11 11:49pm
|
Reply
766
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Why?
|
09-15-11 01:14am
|
Reply
767
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
What Denner and Squirrel say.
One good thing about the pix standards on this site is that they don't just post every single shot as many other sites do. In a single session, I see 200 as the absolute maximum number of photos. More than that necessarily means a lot of duplication and thus user time in viewing and extracting excess stuff.
|
09-14-11 08:46am
|
Reply
768
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
I like 'em moving too.
And you can always snap a screenshot from a video if you like pictures, but you can't make a video out of a still shot.
That said, I also like the high quality eroticism of MetArt as well.
|
09-12-11 08:44am
|
Reply
769
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
oldfart's Reply
I wrote my comment over a year ago and have since signed up. I am a very happy camper with everything, especially the download speeds. As messmer suugested I use DTA on FireFox and occasionally use the pause trick he suggested.
I have had very good luck on this site downloading six or seven at a time that way.
|
09-10-11 12:26pm
|
Reply
770
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
You nailed it. Excellent reply.
|
09-10-11 12:21pm
|
Reply
771
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Just let me get a clear view of the female body parts. The lousy video cameramen seem to spend way too much time on hairy male asses and balls, especially when taping missionary position.
If the babe is doing a heavy duty and superior quality teabagging job, I want the guy to shave his scrotum.
|
09-09-11 09:05am
|
Reply
772
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I see your point. It really does look like a (much) younger version of Cybil Shepard. But Barbara D's breasts look they've had some aftermarket enhancements. Don't think Cybil had any adjustments made.
|
09-08-11 09:31am
|
Comment
773
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
09-06-11 11:29am
Replies (8)
|
Reply
774
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I chatted with someone about this and he raised an interesting point. Until recently portrayals of human waste elimination were considered totally verboten almost as much as underage porn.
Fisting became OK, then peeing, then scat.
So he suspected, and I agreed, that the novelty of seeing a gorgeous babe taking care of business is the grabber and why there's any current interest in the subject.
|
09-06-11 09:54am
|
Reply
775
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Pee, OK. Scat, NOPE.
But peeing on someboduy, or being peed on by somebody or drinking pee froim whatever source is disgusting.
A babe squatting in the bush whilst draining her bladder is OK so long as I get to see her twat. Otherwise...boring.
But scat totally turns me off.
|
09-05-11 11:36am
|
