| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
1001
|
Busty Adventures
(0)
|
|
02-01-10 08:49am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
1002
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Cell phone? Nope.
The new Apple iPad? Probably.
|
01-31-10 10:28am
|
Reply
1003
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
redsky's Comment
I'm a big DDF fan and their content soars over most other sites.
That said, I've had very erratic D/L experience since December with, maybe, 75% of the D/L's flying warp speed and the other 25% crawling at the indicated 15-20 kbs. And the times when the slow speeds happen are not consistent at all.
I agree that it's probably a result of a combination of available bandwidth and server issues but what I really don't understand is why it's only DDF that has this huge difference in speeds when other sites, while they have some variations, are much more consistent.
|
01-28-10 04:12pm
|
Reply
1004
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
FTV Staff's Reply
Rob,
I've often wondered about the proliferation of security cameras everywhere and the effect of that proliferation on your work.
Having been in the retail biz where cctv's are used extensively for shortage control and cash handling control, visible and obvious dummy cameras are used as "decoys" and hi-res "pinhole" cameras that are virtually undetectable to most shoplifters are the ones that are taped and are used as evidence.
I suspect that, because your work is, by and large, "no harm/no foul" in the sense that the venue's management suffers no direct loss, your efforts are observed by far more security people who do not do anything at all (other than, perhaps, get off on what they are watching) than those who do something because they don't want to upset granny when a babe shows what she's made of and granny happens to see the show.
That, to me, is a part of the appeal of your site; that it is a sort of "forbidden fruit."
Thanks for your unique efforts and for making me long to be visiting a Phoenix area resort at the same time as you are doing a shoot.
|
01-28-10 03:11pm
|
Reply
1005
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
WGAF? He cheats on his totally gorgeous wife. That makes no sense in the first place. Then he does what most pro athletes do with their snakes when they are out of town. Which is what makes it a "dog bites man" story.
Why, when John Edwards was running for Vice President and the open secret was out about his messing around outside his marriage, wasn't it even remotely an issue, but with Tiger it was front page news?
|
01-27-10 08:44am
|
Reply
1006
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Reply
I've been a member of FTV for well over a year and had no idea there was an FTV forum. I did a search and found a forum site called DanielleFTV.com/forum
It's a terrific forum and the reactions of its members to the X rated stuff is very interesting.
Thanks, MargulisAZ, for the tip.
|
01-24-10 08:33am
|
Comment
1007
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
01-23-10 09:10pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
1008
|
Hands On Orgasms
(0)
|
Reply of
doglover's Review
I checked out the preview site. It looks like everything is flash and there's nothing that can be downloaded.
But it's unclear. Can you tell us if their content can be downloaded?
|
01-23-10 10:17am
|
Comment
1009
|
Hands On Orgasms
(0)
|
|
01-23-10 10:15am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1010
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Ditto.
And the same for those who "retired" that still have new stuff getting posted.
There's a chance that her stuff will go poof forever and that would be something I would not be happy with.
No, nothing, other than me going blind or dying, would ever cause me to stop checking out what I have on my favorites.
|
01-21-10 03:44pm
|
Reply
1011
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
D/L speed for me has been atrocious since the start of the year. I just finished a D/L of one of today's posts (Kari) that trickled in at a rate that made me recall the days of dialup...35-50kbs.
Strangely I D/L'd another (the G/G of Ricky & LaToya Roxx) that flew at a rate close to 1.0 mbs.
Please also take note that on the DDF Prod site the header for each model is "Her Best Scenes" which suggests that they aren't posting everything they have on DDF Prod.
But subscribers can go to each of their sites where everything is available.
|
01-20-10 12:35pm
|
Reply
1012
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Torn4do's Reply
Makes total sense. I've been a member for 3 years now so I remember way back when they went from 1 update per day to 5 and did not increase the price at all. They did increase the price since then but the PU price brought it back down.
I also remember how awesome I felt the site was when I first joined and would have given these guys a score in the high 90's.
The site hasn't changed much (except for the two integrated pay sites being added) so perhaps I am being a bit rough because the site is still the best for having so much material at such a reasonable price.
|
01-20-10 07:57am
|
Reply
1013
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Torn4do's Review
Good review. Torn4do. With over 1800 videos added per year, most of them full length with only a few with deleted scenes, the site is a treasure trove of material.
But with over 7,500 videos now and closing in on 10,000 sometime next year, these guys need to have a much better pornstar naming accuracy and a better search function or they'll lose a lot of us. In fact I'd be willing to pay an extra $2 or $3 a month to support cleaning up the misspellings and misidentifications that are rampant on this site. They get an uptick for identifying pornstars in every scene (not done that often on DVD sites where the star list is just for the entire DVD), but they lost that uptick with their carelessness.
That is my only disagreement with your review. I think they should lose a few more points because they can't be bothered with accuracy.
Now that I think of it, maybe I should catalogue the entire site and provide a separate adjunct site for a fee. Now that's a job I'd like to do.
|
01-19-10 10:32am
|
Reply
1014
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Torn4do's Reply
Drinking cum is disgusting and does nothing for me at all. Same with pee.
I like internal creampies and watching a sweet babe take a pee, but there's nothing at all appealing about watching someone drink that stuff.
That said, it must have some appeal to some people because there is so much of it on the web, but I have no idea what the appeal could be other than that it is a form of humiliation. And some guys get off on wathching the humiliation of females. (Must have been mistreated by a woman during his life, I guess.)
|
01-19-10 09:58am
|
Reply
1015
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
The term "Gay" used to include lesbians, which are among my few "fetishes."
I don't dig B/B, but I'm OK with G/G and B/G. I've seen some B/B/G where the babe and a guy give head to the other guy. Doesn't do much for me but I'll watch if the babe is watchable.
I don't see any reason why B/B Gay stuff needs to be in a separate PU site, but if the folks who run PU think it's better, I'm OK with it. (I voted for option #2)
|
01-17-10 11:59am
|
Reply
1016
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
That would be me as well.
My problem is that there are so many honeys getting into the business I sometimes feel overwhelmed and frustrated that I cannot keep up.
|
01-16-10 12:54pm
|
Reply
1017
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Sweet babe.
Hope she doesn't get aftermarket boobs.
|
01-16-10 12:52pm
|
Reply
1018
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Just thought I'd raise an interesting point or two.
An 18 year old babe in Chatsworth California can fuck on camera and drink a faceful of cum, but she has to wait three years before she's allowed to drink a glass of wine.
And a guy from Chatsworth can put his life on the line in the military at age 18 but isn't allowed to drink a beer until he's 21.
And most titty bars (oops, I mean Gentlemen's Clubs)in Chatsworth permit 18 year old babes to do their bare-assed thing sticking her twat in the face of any guy who throws money her way but they don't let any guys younger than 21 to enter, even those who spent 3 years fighting in Iraq.
|
01-14-10 07:04pm
|
Reply
1019
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
There's no reason why any intelligent person would even think about keeping it.
But what must be done as well is that the source is reported immediately to the authorities.
The exploitation of underage girls is despicable and when discovered must be stopped immediately.
|
01-13-10 08:33am
|
Reply
1020
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Frankly I'm OK with girl-girl sex for several reasons, but I would insist on being in the audience. But I would draw the line at that point.
If she were really asking for my permission to do boy-girl or multiple, that would tell me she really wants to do it. I'm not into sloppy seconds. Sorry.
|
01-09-10 08:55am
|
Reply
1021
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I had the same issue as exotics4me with D/L speed. I am not signed up for Eve Angel and don't plan to, but the erratic nature of their service is troubling...and the number of updates that have been posted but have not been loaded on their servers makes no sense.
Their customer support replied to me 48 hours after my email by simply saying that I should check back periodically to see if the update has been loaded. No other explanation.
I love the content but the support and D/L speed issues are really starting to bother me.
I would think that DDF would not post the header for an update until the content is ready for the Member to access.
|
01-06-10 08:45am
|
Reply
1022
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
If it's the model's choice to go with a single common name, it's a lousy one. Her income is directly tied to her popularity so if she cannot be found on sites, her popularity diminishes.
Why does Gianna Michaels always show up with both names? Because there are several Gianna's out there. She knows (or her handlers know) that there are those of us who want to check out her superb fun bags and she wants all webmasters to know that people are looking for her, not for one of the lesser Gianna's.
The real problem is when a site chooses some arbitrary name to make a babe appear to e exclusive.
Anyway, being a guy who, when he finds a babe he likes, wants to find anything and everything in that babe's body of work, I answered with the first option.
|
01-05-10 08:49am
|
Reply
1023
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick C's Reply
I was a member of SexyBabes for several years and got Babelicious when it was introduced. I'm a video guy and, because SexyBabes had a long history of excellent video offerings, I stuck with it until I finally gave up waiting for the quality to return to both SexyBabes and Babelicious.
I'm very happy to see your post mainly because I'd love to see your sites return to their original glory. Please keep us up to date on how it goes. I'm ready to rejoin when you tell me things are back to your original standard.
|
01-04-10 06:31pm
|
Reply
1024
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
shroom's Reply
I just checked.
The Hegre Art site accessed directly is offering monthly at $29.95 and annual at $150.00
PU link offers 1 month for $19.95 (renewed at $29.95 after the first month) and $99.95 for 1 year.
If you like Hegre, the PU one year offer is far better at 27 cents per day compared from Hegre's 41 cents per day
|
01-04-10 06:13pm
|
Reply
1025
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review
I was a member for a few months 2 or 3 years ago and felt the same way. Way too many standard set ups. But on several occasions a real knockout babe showed up with a super pro photographer shooting some outstanding stuff.
I quit because the videos (I'm more of a video guy) were tepid and mostly videos of the photo shoots (yawn...wake me when it's over please)and I found myself both bored and frustrated; bored with the sameness and frustrated with the difficulty finding good stuff to download.
So I'm in agreement 100% with your review. The score of 85 you gave it is very fair given the quality and quantity compared with other photo sites and reflects my view more than the higher scores posted by others.
|
01-04-10 12:02am
|
