| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1176
|
Prime Cups
(0)
|
Reply of
xxenon's Comment
Looks like Dev8 has stopped updating all of their sites, not just Prime Cups. Rather strange because they have among the best in the biz.
Damned shame. But hopefully someone will realize that they can still make a ton of revenue if they offer the sites at a lower price and/or create a network to combine some or all of their sites.
|
04-28-09 07:41pm
|
Reply
1177
|
Sun Devil Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
carydjh's Review
After reading this review, I checked out the preview site. The price of $9.99 is advertised as being a starting price and it will go up to $29.99 in July 2009.
There are only ten models on the preview site and no preview videos so if a few of them aren't available at all, this is really not much of a site, considering other sites that are offering a whole lot more content.
|
04-28-09 03:16pm
|
Reply
1178
|
More Gonzo
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I checked through indexxxed.com and found that, according to that Dev8 site, only four of their sites updated in 2009, Ass Traffic, All Internal, Fist Flush and Give Me Pink. It also said that Prime Cups last updated in November 2008.
You may be right that they are taking a break and will be back to a normal updating program. On the other hand, if they've stopped producing content their membership will be dropping like a brick.
We'll see.
|
04-27-09 10:09pm
|
Reply
1179
|
Whale Tail 'N
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
I think you may be talking about just their "whale tail" videos (those with the thong panties showing above the low rise jeans, etc.) They currently have 26 whale tail videos.
They have over 25,000 scenes in 4,800+ DVD's and they update daily. The best part is that they offer DivX downloads along with WMV and MPG formats.
Downloads are somewhat sluggish during peak periods and about normal other times. However, I have experienced more interrupted downloads on this site than others.
Good assortment of sites (48) in their network and another 111 "bonus sites" that offer streaming only.
I'll provide more detail in my updated review.
|
04-27-09 04:23pm
|
Comment
1180
|
More Gonzo
(0)
|
|
04-27-09 12:01pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
1181
|
Whale Tail 'N
(0)
|
|
04-26-09 02:04pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
1182
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I like the idea.
When I post something in the way of a question or a reply to someone's post, I'd like to know that the person has logged on afterward to see if he/she has had a chance to see it.
|
04-26-09 12:25pm
|
Reply
1183
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Ditto. After all, it ain't the phony screeching I care about. But when there's a quiet scene so you can hear the slurping of the pussy as the dick (toy, finger, tongue) is doing its thing is quiet, but erotic as hell.
And I don't give a damn when she had her first fuck, who it was with and how good it was.
|
04-24-09 11:30pm
|
Reply
1184
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Cum swallowing is the one I'm curious about. The idea of external ejaculation was originally to avoid pregnancy, I thought, because exploding internally is, for me, the best part of a good fuck. In early porn you could see the frustration on the guy's face as he pulled out just in the nick of time and dropped his load on her ass.
Unless it's a humiliation thing that gets guys off, I don't see the appeal in watching a gorgeous babe with her face covered with spunk, or in her swallowing it.
My #2 is shitting. I'm OK with peeing but I'm seeing shitting creeping into porn now. That, to me, is a completely disgusting sight.
I don't get ass fucking either but I love watching a reverse cowgirl ass fuck because it shows off all the body parts in a spectacular fashion.
|
04-18-09 09:32am
|
Reply
1185
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Thanks for the news, atrapat. Sort of like some TV promos where they advertise upcoming shows long before they broadcast them. But that's a lousy way to run a porn site.
|
04-18-09 09:24am
|
Reply
1186
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
UPDATE - 4 eamils to support so far, and only autoreplies promising a reply in 1 to 3 days. It's now 6 days with no replies from the support desk.
There's still time left in my month so let's see if there really is a support function for MOFO's.
|
04-18-09 09:21am
|
Reply
1187
|
N/A
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
Right answer. I learned back with my Win2000 machine that NTSF was the only formatting a PC user should ever use.
|
04-16-09 11:55am
|
Reply
1188
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I packed two external hard drives (not "portables") in my checked luggage on a long business trip. One had business stuff and the other had my porn stash.
When I arrived at my destination, all worked perfectly, but when I got home, the drive with the porn stash was not recognized by my 'puter. The shop i use for repairs told me that it was likely that the drive was dislodged as a result of rough handling and that it had a 50/50 chance of being recoverable. Paid $55 for him to rescue it. He couldn't.
Since I did not have an inventory of what was in the stash, I lost everything and had no idea how to find what was lost.
But I learned two lessons.
1. Never pack an external hard drive in my luggage unless I have a complete back-ip.
2. Keep a better record of the content of each drive and the sources of the material (I now use a freeware program, "Karen's Directory Printer," to inventory each drive.)
|
04-16-09 11:50am
|
Reply
1189
|
Brain Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Brainpat's Reply
Brainpat - Can you provide a "guesstimate" of when the makeover will be up and running? I'm ready to drop another site and join yours but would like to join after the improvements are in place and operating.
Thanks.
|
04-15-09 01:38pm
|
Reply
1190
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Good poll.
I tend to DL first, view later. (I'm a video fan.) After I view the video it goes if I am not a big fan of the pornwhore in the video and if there's nothing remarkable about the scene.
However I'm a packrat, not a when in doubt, throw it out type. that means I hang on to a lot of stuff that really should be poofed into cyberspace.
That said, I've deleted a fair amount, especially when one of my 5 external hard drives starts getting too full.
The real question is, what about all the videotapes I accumulated in the 90's and early 2000's? (I'll propose a new poll for that.)
|
04-15-09 10:34am
|
Comment
1191
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
|
04-12-09 10:54am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
1192
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
I agree.
The eBay method lets me know the quality of the buyer/seller over time as well as over the last 12 months. A person who had some rough stuff at the start but has improved a lot in the recent past can be measured differently than an outstanding buyer/seller over history who has either been very quiet lately or has recently slipped a bit in eBay's ratings.
On PU, I would like both; a score since joining and a score for the last, say, 12 months or 2 years. That way a newer member can be recognized for his current contributions and the old timers can be recognized for their longevity.
As for badges, if it isn't broken, why fix it?
As for the weekly draw, same thing. Stay with what seems to work well.
|
04-12-09 08:20am
|
Reply
1193
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Reply
FYI, Brazzers members can sign up for Mofos for $10.00 per month, presumably renewable at that price. That means that Mofos is an extra-cost expansion of Brazzers.
As a Brazzers member I will sign up for Mofos at the $10 price to see what's there and drain off the good stuff. I'll write a review after a month's experience with it.
|
04-11-09 11:15pm
|
Reply
1194
|
Brain Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
impuls's Comment
The trial today is $2.95 for 2 days, so it looks like you were right about it being temporary.
|
04-11-09 12:18pm
|
Reply
1195
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
Great question. I currently have at least one of each of the first four, but no "Date" sites.
So if the question were flipped, I would say the Date sites are my least favorite, and the other four are tied for my favorites.
|
04-08-09 09:15am
|
Reply
1196
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
Xororos's Reply
RagingBuddhist already said a few things I was going to say so let me just say that I am with you on the filet mignon/pizza analogy. I was a member of MetArt for several months and left it because, although there was plenty of material, it was of modest quality and was totally repetitive.
I hope that as time passes the site starts loading enough material to justify it's $18 per month price.
I'm thinking of joining FigureBaby to see how good a site's quality can be and to give me a better basis for evaluating it in comparison with other sites.
|
04-07-09 12:26pm
|
Reply
1197
|
Soft Puffy Nipples
(0)
|
Reply of
giggitygiggity's Review
One thing I've never seen is this warning notice on this site's sign-up page:
NOTICE: THE SERVICE IS PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS" AND "AS AVAILABLE" BASIS
This alone should earn this site a score of 25.
Now, if you are into nice soft puffies as I am, check out this site as an alternative:
The Puffy Nipple
|
04-06-09 09:59pm
|
Reply
1198
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
While I agree a site needs to start somewhere and to grow in a controlled manner. But what seems to be the case here, by your description, is that they are still in the planning stage and are playing with what they want to be when they go "prime time."
Most embryonic sites start off as an adjunct of another, established site as a "bonus" offering in order to get some direct feedback by porn users...or at least a very low membership price like $5.99.
But at $17.99 with only two "naked videos" and very few photos, I think I can wait a while.
Great review RB.
|
04-05-09 01:01pm
|
Reply
1199
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
"Stupid?" Not really.
When I log on to a porn site, my objective is to get it off watching gorgeous babes engaged in activities that I enjoy.
I will try a game on rare occasions but when I see Gianna Michael's fabulous orbs next to a game, for some strange reason I check out the fabulous Ms. Michaels and quickly forget the game.
But I can see how others might enjoy playing a game or two, so to call them "stupid" isn't right.
My answer is No. Period. Therefore I did not vote because that option was not offered.
|
04-04-09 12:47pm
|
Reply
1200
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Reply
I agree completely. They first included the new channels in their search results but unless you committed to the fee for the site the results were just a tease. The notion was not thought through carefully by any stretch. I suspect it may have cost them some business.
|
04-03-09 10:20pm
|
