| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1151
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I totally agree. Another excellent review by Trash Man. The network looked very promising when going onto the preview site, but thanks to Trash Man;s review it's clear that the majority of the "bonus sites" are just archived old stuff.
I'm seeing how this is becoming a more prevalant practice...advertising a big network that turns out to be a collection of dormant sites, usually with crappy quality.
|
06-15-09 12:15pm
|
Reply
1152
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Since I was burned (badly) by Danni.com 3 years ago, I have a procedure that I follow religiously when I sign up for any new site.
1. I create a Word document where I copy the URLs of the preview site and of the sign up page.
2. I use Print Screen to copy the confirmation page with the subscription number and all other details. If the confirmation page permits (they usually do) I also copy and paste it to the Word document.
3. I open a new window leaving the confirmation page open, and try to log on independently. If I succeed, then I save the Word document and close the confirmation window. If not, I find the "contact us" link and will immediately call the 800 number of CCBill or of the site to confirm that my subscription is active.
4. If I'm unsuccessful, my next call is to my credit card issuer to have them cancel...or reverse the charge.
5. I then go to PU and post a comment. Recently I had an issue with PornstarXS.com accessing their trial. I received no replies at all from their contact us contacts but I did get a response from the webmaster.
To be fair, almost every site I've joined since being screwed by Danni.com has worked perfectly and where they haven't, the 800 number has worked to get things on track.
|
06-14-09 10:08am
|
Reply
1153
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Others have said similar things, but the issue with me is lousy quality sites. The saving grace is PU and TBP where I can check out every site before I waste my money on a crappy one.
There is no need for more hardcore sites whatsoever. We're swimming in them already. But there is a real need for new high quality hardcore sites and/or an upgrade of the mediocre hardcore sites..
|
06-12-09 02:25pm
|
Comment
1154
|
Jan's WebRing
(0)
|
|
06-06-09 09:47pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1155
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
xyzzy's Comment
Since Danni Ashe sold her site back in 2005, their support function has gone from the best in the business to the absolute worst.
If you sign up for Danni.com, do NOT expect any customer support. (Had no billing probs with their own processor.)
|
06-06-09 01:44pm
|
Reply
1156
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
Being 29.95 Euros, the cost of this site can vary in US$ terms (they charge your credit card in Euros, they say.) Right now it's about US$42.00. Also, their preview site claims on one place that there are 18 sites in the network, and, in another, 13 sites.
In any case I really liked the review. It told me everything I wanted to know and, because I like the same things, I'm seriously considering joining up.
|
06-06-09 10:12am
|
Reply
1157
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
If you use the PU/TBP link to the site, you will also get the $19.95 rate for the first month...recurs at b$29.95.
|
05-31-09 12:39pm
|
Reply
1158
|
N/A
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
Agree, but the advent of internet porn has saved me tons of $ that I once spent on video rentals, magazines and other pursuits.
|
05-30-09 10:56pm
|
Comment
1159
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
|
05-29-09 11:06pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1160
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Navigation and Searching. Considering that each of us has favorite babes, studios and genres, and that search technology is highly sophisticated, it pisses me off royally when I know a model is on a site but is virtually impossible to locate.
A similar beef is inaccuracy. On a great site like Video Box the one serious flaw is the inability of the webmaster to be consistent in spelling a model's name. That makes it so damned difficult to find all the content they have. Jenna Doll, for example, shows up as Jena Doll, Jena, Jenna Dall, and probably others. And it isn't the studio's fault. The cover usually has the correct spelling. It's just sloppiness.
|
05-29-09 11:04pm
|
Reply
1161
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Jay G said, "Storage is incredibly cheap and the numbers, I agree, don't always mean quality, but I am sure getting pickier and pickier about a "quality look" to videos. Old stuff is seldom good enough for a spoiled kid like me."
That's me. Exactly. Three or four years ago I was ok with almost anything just so long as it displayed what I wanted...plenty of PTA*.
Now, however, where the quality is so good even a gynecologist would be happy, and with a brand new Seagate 1.5 Tb hard drive ($129.99 + tax) joining my 640Gb, and two 500Gb hard drives, I'm like Jay, am totally spoiled. When I watch some of the older stuff that I used to watch over and over, I only wish it could be upgraded in quality.
The real question is, what's next? I can't imagine better quality than is now available. Maybe smell-o-vision or a form of 3-D?
*PTA - Pussy, Tits and Ass.
|
05-24-09 10:12am
|
Reply
1162
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
The $14.95 price is what made me enroll. I like the concepts and the very attractive style in particular, but I also pretty much agree with the score. The only thing that might make me up the points a bit is that the site has an unusually large number of models I like and all with original content.
|
05-23-09 12:15pm
|
Reply
1163
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Drooler: "BTW I don't have an organization issue because I do it by model name --> source --> name of video or gallery. It's the last piece there that gets the treatment every long once in a while. Some titles just need ... help!"
I do the same. The model name gets adds at the end of the name, occasionally, such as (!!!), (.)(.) or ??? [when I think the name provided by the source is inaccurate]
The source is never altered.
The file name is where I use a touch of originality if the title from the source is not descriptive, but I try to be descriptive, not humorous...unless I can be descriptive and humorous at the same time.
|
05-23-09 12:09pm
|
Reply
1164
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
BG or BGG - either one is fine with me. I want to see the babe and her assets and a good porno does that. A BBG is lousy because the two guys usually block the view so all we get to see is some guy's hairy ass and/or hairy balls, not what I watch porn to see.
|
05-20-09 11:08pm
|
Reply
1165
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I will go up to $30 but no more...and think long and hard even then.Under $20 gets my attention and under $25 will get me but for no longer than 1 month max.
Interestingly when I cancel those sites over $25 I almost always get a "stick around" price. One site that started at $30 was persistent. Each time I answered NO to a reduced price I got yet a lower one. I finally bit aty $5.99 per month.
|
05-18-09 06:55pm
|
Reply
1166
|
Stunners
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Babelicious posts pix 5 days a week (daily except Weds & Fri) and one video clip on Weds and Fri.
SexyBabes.TV posts pix 5 days a week (Mon thru Fri) and a video clip on Saturday.
I am now a member of New Sensations and am OK with that site but not thrilled. That's really the main reason I've been reluctant to sign up with Stunners.
But if Stunners updates twice or more per day, I think I'm going to give that site a try. Their preview site is superb and if you and Denner are this positive about that site, there's no reason to wait any longer.
|
05-17-09 01:19pm
|
Reply
1167
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Back in the good old days when unshaven bush was common, I really liked the snatch to match (nothing like a beautiful trimmed blonde snatch on a beautiful blonde babe), but now I like whatever color enhances the babe. I'm more into hairstyle than color.
One amazing example of how much difference hair color makes is with Victoria Vonn, who shows up with several hair colors, most of them OK but not great. But when she appears as a full blonde, Little Richard magically changes to Big Dick even before she gets naked.
Also the hairstyle on the babe can do wonders. Bald is awful but a pageboy of any hair color on a beautiful babe just drives me fucking wild.
|
05-16-09 08:15am
|
Reply
1168
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
Only once (where I was notified) a few years back. Of course it could have occurred since then where I've not been notified.
|
05-15-09 08:08am
|
Reply
1169
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Did you ever join this site? If so, any observations?
|
05-10-09 07:42pm
|
Reply
1170
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I hear you, Nubiles is on my short list to replace a site that I eventually tire of.
Interesting side note that shows you are definitely on target...Nubiles has a check box on their signup page for...yup...MetArt. (Unless you uncheck it you get a $2.99 trial followed by a full membership at $29.99.
|
05-10-09 06:56pm
|
Reply
1171
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Review
Although I'm a video guy, I signed up for Met Art for a few months and was blown away by the volume and quality of the photo content. As zzzins suggests in his review, the videos are not why one signs up...and his comments are why I decided to drop the site altogether.
In photos, I prefer erotic over artsy fartsy, and Met Art does provide some good erotic stuff. But the majority of their material is more of the artsy style. There are no men in any of their material at all, no overt pussy or tit play, no insertions, but tons of gorgeous babes of all shapes, sizes and sexiness.
One other point. If you see a babe you'd like to see more of, you'll be frustrated because the site uses just first names and in more than one case the names they use are totally different than those used in other sites.
|
05-10-09 05:24pm
|
Reply
1172
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Simple. If the performers are over 18, are doing whatever they are doing voluntarily and with full and open mutual consent, no one is getting hurt and whatever they are doing is not being done in public where people who don't want to see it or who shouldn't see it can't see it, then have at it.
That's what I feel about prostitution as well. If Carmella Bing gets $1,000 to fuck someone in front of a camera and hets $1,000 to fuck some one in private in some hotel room, why is one legal and the other not?
|
05-10-09 04:13pm
|
Reply
1173
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Ditto everything that Jay said. I agree with him completely.
|
05-04-09 09:25pm
|
Reply
1174
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
I still have most of my stash but I really haven't looked at very many since the web got really good with the quality and quantity. If I ever get around to it I will convert the really good stuff and/or the stuff that will never make it to the web to digital. Unfortunately I don't think that time will ever come. :-(
|
05-02-09 05:59pm
|
Reply
1175
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
With the slow rate of updates, this site qualifies as a site one joins for a month at a time every 6 to 12 months after draining the good stuff from its current content.
FYI, I signed up for a month at $30, then decided to cancel. I got a "please stay" offer for $19.95 that I accepted because I wasn't done downloading everything I wanted.
One important point is that each model's material is broken into several pieces which can be good or bad. Good, because you can pick the scenes you want (I tire of the "restaurant episodes" where the model is eating lunch with the videographer and who shyly will pull out a tit or will spread her legs for a few seconds so after viewing the scene once, I'll blow it off and keep the full nudity stuff.)
I like the site because there's no bullshit. You get what they promise. No pop-ups, no surprises, no upsells.
|
05-01-09 12:48pm
|
