| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
What Boys Want
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
I've no idea from whom that 'No' hailed from. Maybe one of you computer jedis can unscramble his anonymous ID. My gut feeling is his dark designs haunt some other site, that he's an ex-member.
|
07-11-09 08:00pm
|
Reply
102
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
When I first saw porn flicks in the late 1970s, "Deep Throat", "Behind the Green Door" et al, had been out (If only in peep shows) for four or five years. But not in my one-horse town. For a lucky few in isolated hinterlands, flesh flicks were soundless short B/W 8mm tapes.
|
07-11-09 07:03am
|
Reply
103
|
What Boys Want
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
I received the 'No trust' after reviewing nine sites. I had been a member of each for at least a month. Can't recall what led me to type "..I joined seven of the nine sites mentioned..." It should of read that of the nine, I belonged to seven for just a month.
I have since rejoined two but haven't updated my reviews due to sheer laziness.
So my rating is tagged with 'No' trust. That dude could of gilded the bitter pill by either not being anonymous or writing more than two sentences to explain his decision.
I appreciate your concern, Badandy400.
|
07-11-09 06:53am
|
Reply
104
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I posted this question after chewing the fat with my physician, someone I've known since 3rd grade. Doc mentioned in a discouraged voice that men in the 20's were pestering relentlessly for Viagra prescriptions. To a man, each mentions a porn-induced inability to reach a stiffness required for mons venus penetration. That they've been spoiled by busty online tarts and their willingness to DP or deep throat at the drop of a hat. Doc's query of why not give up porn while in a long-term relationship generates a wide-eyed expression as if the guy suggested giving up indoor plumbing. My own smut hasn't (yet) displaced the four idealized versions of females I played hide the salami with in carefree, sylvan-ish pre-HIV days. Those teens displayed then the same minor flaws found on current bedmates, now all 40-ish: extra flesh, crows feet, a saggy bow, acres of freckles and/or saddlebacks.
|
06-09-09 08:57am
|
Reply
105
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Visa charged me one buck foreign transaction fee for each monthly tab. Just another excuse for more $. I'm glad ya enjoyed the review. FistingInAction.com and PowerOfFeet.com have been added since my most recent m'ship.
|
06-06-09 11:40am
|
Reply
106
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
As i didn't see my first flesh flick until age 25 or thereabouts, I can go a month of Sundays without. When single (as I am now) I check whatever site I'm subscribed with daily. If in a relationship, I'm cold turkey. Longest so far is 18 months.
|
05-27-09 08:05am
|
Reply
107
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
"17th Century Flemish Art (Vol 2)" is the jewel box label holding a rather graphic DVD of favourite downloads. Just in case one of my nephews, curious as cats, should stumble across it in my desk draw.
|
05-25-09 08:04pm
|
Reply
108
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
My wanna-keep-forever stash fits on two (2) DVDs. Of the last ten sites I've joined over appox two years, I've kept an average of four flicks and/or ten pics from each.
|
05-24-09 01:07pm
|
Reply
109
|
N/A
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
You have posted hundreds of replies (Not all worthy of a Demosthenes)to the cts of others, yet my single sentence reply draws a heavy-handed response. You're the only one on PU permitted to be a bastard?
Let's keep this in perspective:
I was not advocating the free distribution of heroin in schools
nor roasting babies in a furnace. I could argue your 2nd post but that's rewarding posts that are over-wrought.
|
03-26-09 11:51am
|
Reply
110
|
N/A
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
It caused problems, and though I don't think most people would look at the situation and think anything about it, it is much different when put in that position. I remember one of the straight players even saying, "Would I be allowed to shower with the female cheerleaders?" and he had a good point. That would be seeing your sexual preference nude.
He didn't have a good point as showers are seperated by gender not sexual preference.
|
03-25-09 04:19pm
|
Reply
111
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Signed on to 'Horse Hung Hispanics' (now defunt?) yrs ago for girlfrined. She grew up in the macho-drenched atomosphere of P. Ricco. By the age of 13 numerous men had exposed themselves to her, had made graphic comments and some of these dudes were police or from the Island's professional classes. Nothing exception in her experience: that's just the 1950s era mentality that still lingers in PR. So she really grooved to the vids of guys taking wangs anally or playing tonsil hockey with others. We had some great fucking on account of that site.
|
03-25-09 10:08am
|
Reply
112
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
"We all know that there are generally no good looking women at nudist camps anyways." Jeepers, that's a broad statement for someone who probably hasn't attended. The gals at the three I've visited minic the US population. But the resorts are nearly all family-run, family-oriented, so babe spotting is an unwanted behaviour.
|
03-06-09 12:13am
|
Review
113
|
What Boys Want
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
07-11-09 08:18pm (Update History)
Reason: An update to my intital review of 4 mths ago, see 'bottom line redux'.
|
| Pros: |
-The elephant graveyard of amateur porn.
-Majority of clips have sound.
-Low price.
-Good international mix: just 33% of members are US citizens.
-42,000 movies & 938,000 pics as of 1 March 09.
-Peer review is fair and critical: out of 11K fuck pics, 190 are rated four or more stars on a scale of one to five. Just 38 of 7046 BJ clips are considered worthy of four or more stars. Other site contents are too often rated stellar, the porn version of grade inflation. |
| Cons: |
-No zip files.
-Low res: the number for an average picture sounds like a good golf score. 173 party clips occupies just 1.22 GB. The 597 for beach requires all of 3.92GB. So clarity is rough, almost never good enough to judge eye colour or fordyce spots.
-Search is horrific. More on that in BL.
-Watermarks are of a set size, so it appears large on too many clips.
-"To ensure pics and or movies are not randomly tagged and abuse, we ask you to have at least 250 postings before you can tag." Hence the lion share of images lack tags.
-Many vids are 10 to 20 seconds duration. The camera pans left to reveal a taunt, lithe, naked homewrecker fisting herself... "Now we'll see something.." I think, not without satifaction, and the clip ends. Ugh. |
| Bottom Line: |
This daedal maze would be time consuming even if the search was flawless. Its not. The huge number of images are slotted into a few sections: stripping, dance, facials, etc. These can be search verge to verge by tags or duration. In theory ya can hunt down the top rated 200 of any section, but the best of cute/sexy reveals the same 11 vids. The highest rated 200 fuck pics generates just 66 finds. Two emails to support generated a stock boilerplate response that their tech section is working on the problem.
So...what do boys want? Here its lots of bjs performed by bottle blond females on men who keep their shirts on. No safe sex. Big on threesomes so long as the 3rd person is female. Open to any Race so long as they are White.
This is the site if non-pro smut is your thing & if ya have the hours to devote to its thousands of pages. Dividing the wheat from chaff will probably give me carpet tunnel.
Some great examples of non-pious proclivities reside here but I'm guessing a multi-month m'ship will be require to run them to earth.
The bottom line redux: I'm adding this short ct four months later: this remains the best girl-next-door site, even with the flawed search feature.
Perhaps one pic in every 400-500 is that of a pro model. A good number of Ashley Juggs fotos have slipped in under the radar, but otherwise the site does a class A job of rooting out the non-amateur stuff. I've yet to stumble across any flick that I suspected was from a pro site.
The Euro has gained a bit in value and last month's tab was $14.03. My 1st mth of m'ship was appox twelve bucks. |
|
03-02-09 12:02pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
114
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
Reply of
rome476's Reply
FullyclothedSex was updating weekly, but I only glanced at myfetish in passing so I can't say.
I'm still trying to run to earth a decent orgy site. Others claiming to offering this venue stock threesomes or foursomes. An orgy is an encounter where the models run out of endurance, not partners.
|
02-17-09 08:25pm
|
Reply
115
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
Most of the gals don't speak on camera and whom could place their accents via the moans alone? I had assume the majority hail from Australia, the site's home base. I do recall two or three women introduced as Americans.
|
02-17-09 08:07pm
|
Review
116
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-All other masturbation oriented sites fade to a pale pink in comparison.
-The Female orgasm, not a phrase usually associated with porn, is on full display.
-A host of fresh faces. Does anyone claim to have seen these gals elsewhere? Other than its non-nude sister site beautifulagony.com
-Most lose themselves to their pleasures, others stare straight into the lens. Some of each group generate yells and groans that are klaxon-loud. I dare say the building has no mice.
-During the post-orgasm, the sensation overload leaves some barely ambulant as good sex is a gentle cathartic.
-While some don't get naked, I enjoy the slow undressing of those that do. Many begin by rubbing thru their garments & this may continue for some time before blouse, bra and panties are removed at leisure. |
| Cons: |
-Understandably, a vid only site, as moans/groans don't translate well to pics.
-Some updates are merely a previously released scene now shown at a wider crop or via another camera.
-Perhaps two gals old enough to have bought a beta tape. The rest are just past legal age.
-The home page naviagation links are squashed into a small area. I clicked into wrong sections thru out my m'ship.
-Its a one-trick pony site: the desire to film big O's reaches something not far from mania.
-Concolourous sets. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is one of the tiny number of porn sites whose members aren't 98% male. Don't write that your sexy wife is devoted to Abbeywinters.com or the latest female conquest really grooves to your old downloads of Jeanna Fine fuck-fests. No, I'm guessing this is one of a very few with a sizable m'ship of single females who tracked it down on their own accord. Others would be adultfriendfinder.com and, maybe, hegre-art.com
-If your idea of perfect porn is non-plot fucking conducted at breakneck speed, hup-two-three-four! then you won't incur an erection. If you prefer women being fucked into the floorboards, so hard she ends up with a nosebleed or concussion, this site won't raise your blood pressure.
-A reminder of what gets many women off: fully half don't finger themselves internally, the dildos are small-ish, I don't recall any anal probing. Judging by the twitches and moaning, any desire for cock is a passing velleity compared to the yearning for mons venus stimulation. Gentlemen, take notice. |
|
02-16-09 04:53pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
117
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
While at college, a classmate turned up on the cover of a major gay porn magazine. I saw it while perusing the porn at a local newspaper stand. I forget the name as this was circa 1983. He had always been comfortable in his flesh: did nude modeling for several art classes, always the first to wear sandals and shorts each Spring.
|
02-01-09 08:35pm
|
Reply
118
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
My horry story: Was denied access when I first trying logging in. Roughly 30 minutes had passed since signing up for a month. I called the tech line and they stated new accounts can take up to 48 hours to appear. Kiss my black ass! Its 2009, not 1991. I sent three emails over the space of two hrs, by the end of which, I could log into my account.
|
01-24-09 03:24pm
|
Reply
119
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
Reply of
rome476's Reply
If memory serves, Fullyclothedsex is still active. Those that aren't are cumonjugs, peesquad and, I think, myfetish.
|
01-24-09 03:17pm
|
Review
120
|
Orgy Max
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-For certain fetishes like watersports or clothed intercourse, this is one of the very few locations offering quality work. Many fetish sites remain didactic bores.
-Women devour cock: many are veterans of Czech cathouses where they received a thorough grounding in wickedess.
-'Drunk Sex Orgy' has little drinking but lots of big group action that's well staged. Often outdoors with big casts. Ditto for 'Mad Sex Party' other than its mostly done indoors.
-'Pissing in Action' Well, jeepers.. where to begin? The non-pious proclivities on display are like nothing I've seen before.
-The oldest vids of each site were badly shot by someone who was (my guess) working his johnson with the other hand. But the vast majority of flicks are top-notch productions regarding focus, lighting, sound, close-ups of facials, et al.
-I'm not a cruel person, but I did enjoy seeing some women in 'Party Hardcore' become drunk as sailors. |
| Cons: |
-"13 sites for one low price." Well, no. Two haven't had a new posting in many months while 'Fully Clothed Pissing' is simply vids from 'Fully Clothed Sex' with five to ten minutes of watersports tagged on.
-Not a single vid in English.
-Episodes are usually broken into four chunks. Because of...
-Big file size, often 400 to 800 megs per episode. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've signed on for one month durations three times over the last three years. If you are a returning member, the old name Euromax.com, has been retired.
'Party Hardcore' remains my favourite of the lot with its lengthly prologues as the male strippers do their damnest to con boozing babes into casting off tops or performing BJs. I'll guess I'm the sole American reviewing this site who cares for the plot development. So many of us prefer gonzo style, but I won't hold it against you. PH is the closest thing I've come to true reality porn. The majority of the gals are not in the business, at least judging by the reactions when the strippers finally unveil their wangs: its like the hen-house at feeding time or the elephant scene in the opera Aida. I believe its an open bar for those attending. That's why the noise level equals a drunken Irish beehive. Admission is free with the understanding that the whole operation is being filmed. Clearly the gatekeepers let in only those within a set age and weight range. My guess: if you bought 8-tracks, you're too old. If your belt is equal in length to your height, you're not getting past the bouncer.
Despite being a motor mouth, I can't describe what it is about (some) pissing vids that push my button: that its the ultimate facial or an act of complete submission? Maybe I'm just a bastard. What induces a woman to perform for a watersports site? Is the money that good? Piss may be better than penury, but I suspect most were at the end of their tether when they agreed. |
|
01-21-09 09:41pm
Replies (9)
|
Reply
121
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Comment
I joined several days ago. Let me mention in passing that this is the only porn site I can picture having a membership that isn't 95% male.
|
01-21-09 08:21pm
|
Reply
122
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
Someone has already noted that porn actors aren't convincing when mouthing lines... Yet plot remains very important to me, hence my pref for European made flicks. That geographic area has its share of Gonzo porn but remain very capable of generating a good plot when they set their minds to it.
I was floored by the # of replies stating plot held no interest.
I like the long-running Pierre Woodman Casting series: Dirty P often talks the nubile gals into exposing more than they had planned on revealing. Ditto for hordes of other sites where the performers slowly build up steam: busty.pl, partyhardcore.com, Ifeelmyself.com, et al.
|
01-21-09 08:18pm
|
Reply
123
|
N/A
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
I assume you wanted to say 'you couldn't care less.'
|
01-21-09 08:02pm
|
Reply
124
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
Yeah, the soundless videos are a flaw I shoulda mentioned. I'll add these appear to be limited to older vids of short duration. Models affected include Tara Radovic, Janella and Danni herself. With exceptions, I join sites for the pics, not vids. Hence if a full third of the vids turn out to be soundless as ya state, I won't view my monthly tab as wasted. Yet I expected more from this site. Danni was a trail-blazer in online smut and has made stacks of money, enough to operate the most flawless of sites.
|
01-10-09 09:57pm
|
Review
125
|
Danni.com
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Heaps of content
Daily updates
Well lit, sharply focused photography
Easy site to navigate
Wide range of bodies from flat chested to F cups, boyish frames to hourglass figures.
Top talent on display: Ashley Juggs, Jelena Jensen, Aria Giovanni, Bettie Ballhause & Danni herself. |
| Cons: |
Of the appox 30 videos viewed, five
or six crapped out one-third or half-way thru.
Others, mainly from 'In bed with Danni', have an echo.
Expensive for a softcore site. |
| Bottom Line: |
Its not gonna be your cup of tea if the titles you normally pursue are "Throat gaggers, Vol 69" or "Rectum Wreckers".
The 'In bed with Danni' interviews, conducted naked by both parties, have an air of spontinanity absence in the vast majority of porn. Maybe they're superior actors fooling hayseeds like me but I found the interviews with
super-hot Ashley Juggs and Monica Mendez pleasant
listening. I joined to see one talented MILF
called PennyLynn, whose images I've found offsite with the danni.com watermark on each. But a verge to verge search failed to locate this 40-ish model. (Not to be confused with a younger gal with the same moniker also on the site) |
|
01-10-09 02:30pm
Replies (6)
|
|
