Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
926
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
streamingeagle's Comment
I can't say that this bothers me because I find mp4 to be superior to WMV and the files are usually smaller but U hope this is temporary if only because some people may still want to use WMV. I could see them stopping to update in WMV but why remove the files when they were already offered in that format.
Thanks for the info.
|
01-20-14 02:42pm
|
Reply
927
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Since tan lines means that the woman wore some type of bathing suit than they must be a little bit healthier than the ones without. Not by much of course but I don't believe that those without tan lines are staying inside while their friends are outside getting tanned.
|
01-20-14 02:38pm
|
Reply
928
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Being a huge fan of 70's and 80's movies than of course I love tan lines. I have to agree with Cybertoad that these really only look good on women with natural breasts and preferably if they have small C cups or smaller. Who can forget Stacey Donovan who probably never shot one scene without tan lines.
|
01-20-14 02:33pm
|
Reply
929
|
DVD Tube
(0)
|
Reply of
pantsmulligan's Reply
At least you did your homework before joining which is what I was hoping you had done. I would probably have done the same as you in this case. Now you know something important about CC processor. It really doesn't matter which one you use because they are not a guarantee that you won't get shafted by the site itself. I learned that the hard way. I hope you do a full review of the site because it doesn't have a recent one and I don't think TBP plan son reviewing it which means yours would be the go to for reference.
|
01-20-14 03:26am
|
Reply
930
|
DVD Tube
(0)
|
Reply of
pantsmulligan's Comment
I'm always curious to know the thought process someone goes through to pick a site like this when there are clearly so many similar ones that are superior to it. Does this site have certain movies that VideosZ or Videobox did not have because I didn't see them. The search option are piss poor because I didn't see anywhere to search by studio which is very important in a site like this.
I feel bad for you because no one likes to get cheated out of their money and I'm glad you are warning others but in future you should use the resources that TBP/PU offer people looking for porn. If you had simply asked whether it was a good idea to join this site then I and others would have told you no.
|
01-19-14 09:35am
|
Reply
931
|
WCP Club
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
I'm a big fan of interracial porn and I always try to find new places to download that kind of porn. There aren't many sites/studios that shoot interracial porn on a regular basis. That's why this site with all that is wrong with it gets a better score than it might deserve.
|
01-17-14 07:52am
|
Reply
932
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Websters definition for acting is: The art or profession of performing the role of a character. this is not what a model does. That doesn't mean that I don't see where Denner is coming from but I don't consider what a model does as acting so much as posing.
After all no one thinks that a model who's wearing a business suit in a court room photo is a lawyer but we do if we see that same model wearing that same suit during a movies court room scene. Mind you that last part rarely happens because most models can't act. The best examples of that are all those models that tried their hand at acting.
I can count on my hand the number of models who were able to have an actual acting career.
|
01-16-14 10:14am
|
Review
933
|
WCP Club
(0)
79.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+Content is all exclusif and it's dated.
+You get access to 95 dvd or 565 scenes.
+They offer more than 400 models that showcase different ethnicities and age groups.
+One of the few sites that has all interracial content.
+You can use a download manager.
+Videos can be downloaded in 3 format from low to high def. Resolution for SD is 720x404 and HD is 1280 x 720. |
Cons: |
-Downloads speeds are really bad becasue a 500MB scene takes about 5 to 8 minutes to download.
-You only get access to a tiny portion of the entire WCP library.
-No clue what their update schedule is because I haven't seen one new dvd in the last 8 days.
-They don't update with a complete dvd but add scenes over many days.
-Surfing the site is not easy because the back button always brings you the main page and you lose your search options.
-For some reason their pages down resize to fit the screen so you have to scroll left to right to see everything.
-Part of all their pages are dedicated to advertising. |
Bottom Line: |
*This is the second site owned by Manica Media that I have joined and both have the same cons mentioned above. Luckily this site has one thing the other didn't have and it's that their content can only be found on streaming sites so joining this one is a great deal on that front. Of course the downside for anyone wanting to download all their movies is that one month is not likely to be enough unless download speeds increase. I don't need hyper speed but it shouldn't take 5 minutes to download a video.
*I'm a huge fan of West Coast movies so getting access to part of their library is good news but it also really sucks that you only get access to a small part of it. If they at least added 2 or more movie per week then I would be happy but if this site does what Pinko did then I don't expect to see any new movie while I'm a member. I'm not even sure if they will add a new one each week. They certainly haven't done so since I've been a member.
*They should take some time and do some major tweaking to their site design. I shouldn't have to scroll left and right to see everything, the most recent stuff should always be on the main page, you should be able to use the back button from any page to the previous one as opposed to be sent to the main all the time and I shouldn't have to push out of the way a window to cam sites. You want to advertise cam shows then do it on a separate page.
**If you like hardcore interracial porn and you don't mind staying more than one month(that or you are only looking for part of the library) then you should be happy with this site. Of course you also have to be okay with the cons.** |
|
01-15-14 11:33am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
934
|
Harmony Vision
(0)
|
Reply of
stingerxxx's Review
The only site that I think is partially worth joining is WCP Club and the reason why I say that is because you can't find any place where you can download West Coast movies for a low cost. Most of the big streaming sites have WCP movies but you have to be rich to even consider downloading their movies because they are more expensive than buying the dvd. I'll post a review of WCP Club maybe today or tomorrow so that you have an idea what you are getting for your money.
|
01-14-14 10:12am
|
Reply
935
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
Probably my biggest pet peeve are those sites that generate their own passwords because they tend to always be funky weird and hard to remember but not far behind are those sites that have a pop-up log in window. The biggest reason why I don't like the pop-up window is partly because of my pet peeve regarding auto-generated passwords. It's happened more than once that I joined a site that had the auto-generated password and the pop-up window but where the log in info does not get copied to the pop-up window and that meant I had to log in to my email service to get that info.
|
01-14-14 10:00am
|
Reply
936
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
It's always the face first and then I move down.
|
01-12-14 09:09am
|
Reply
937
|
Everything Butt
(0)
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Reply
I'm not so sure that Sex and Submission or for that matter any of the other Kink sites have cut down on anal as much as they now hire such a wide variety of performers and some of these do not do anal so you know that if they are in any of the Kink sites then there will not be any anal. There have been a few of these on Everything Butt and I can remember one on bound gangbang who did not do anal and both sites by default have to at least include anal. I know the Bound Gangbang scene was not well received and Kink learned that they should never hire non-anal performers for a gang bang. It's somewhat different in the case of EB. If it's a non-anal performer in a two or more women scene then you know she will play the part of the dom who gives but never receives. Those aren't as bad because you still get anal but I usually feel cheated when the scene is advertised as starring a specific performer and she is not the one having anal sex.
I checked the number of anal VS non-anal scenes on S&S and out of the 50 latest scenes. I'd say about half or so are anal. Now out of the non-anal scenes you have 2 with Dani Daniels. She was a mostly g/g only performer until recently and she has always been a non-anal girl. Riley Reid has 2 scenes and she is also a non-anal girl so of course she won't do anal for Kink. Although it would be great to see more anal on S&S. The fact that they can hire some of the above performers is good news.
P.S: The only Kink site that is able to hire a wide variety of women willing to do anal is Everything Butt. They are even able to hire those that have never done anal elsewhere. I think the main reason is because it can be a women only scene and therefore very little danger of getting an STD.
|
01-11-14 11:47am
|
Reply
938
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I also picked #3 because there are quite a few days that can go by be before I visit a specific site but there are some reasons which are not mentioned in the choices. The most obvious one being that not every site updates on a daily basis so there is no reason to visit that site until there is a new update.
|
01-10-14 08:03am
|
Reply
939
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on facials because I believe that it's impossible to shoot a glamorous facial. The act itself prohibits the possibility that it can be glamorous. Of course that has not stopped these people from shooting them and I suspect that enough members like them to make them comeback.
I'm just glad that there is one site that still likes to show people kissing and guys going down on their lady friends
|
01-08-14 05:59pm
|
Reply
940
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I picked never.
|
01-08-14 09:48am
|
Review
941
|
X-Art
(0)
90.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+The scenes are very well shot with multplie camera angles and good lighting
+They appear to have all exclusive content(at least video wise).
+Over 530 videos and 550 photosets that can be downloaded.
+Videos can be downloaded in MP4 they offer a wide variety of video resolutions from 640x480 all the way to HD 1920x1080.
+Photosets can be downloaded as a single zip file and they offer you 3 possible resolution(4000x2667 is the highest one)
+All content is dated and they appear to update with one new video or photosets once every day.
+Nearly 200 different models to choose from.
+Lots of kissing. |
Cons: |
-Content may be a litle too glamorous for some.
-The videos are on the glamorous side of things but this is still gonzo porn with no premise, no dialogue and basically just sex.
-The lighting on a few of the videos leaves a lot to be desired.
-Their models are all teenagers and women in their early 20's so anyone looking for more mature performers will have to look elsewhere.
-Not all the models have accompanying videos and/or photosets.
-If anal is your thing then be advised that they only have 17 videos and they probably try not to shoot these type of scenes. |
Bottom Line: |
*I've been aware of this site for a couple of years but I kept putting off joining because I was afraid that I wouldn't enjoy their content. I can't say that I was wrong because I find that their content is mostly hit or miss for me.
*One of the reasons why I had reservation is that I had expectations that the content would appeal a lot more to me and they were unable to do that. Not their fault since I may not be the person this is meant for.
*Now the second reason is that these videos are for the most part gonzo porn with not many things to distinguish them from other gonzo videos. I know some will disagree but let me demonstrate what I mean.
1-There's no dialogue in these videos.
2-It's common for the performers to be naked or semi-naked at the very beginning of the scenes.
3-The girls give a BJ to a guy who already has a hard-on.
4-The videos show a variety of sexual positions but I couldn't help but feel that they are there so that the camera operator can show a different shots then a proper evolution of a real sex scene.
5-The last thing but the most important one to me is that it's common to see facials and a cum shot to the mouth.
*Sorry but facials should never be included in glamorous porn because there's nothing glamorous about shooting cum all over the face of the woman you had sex with since there's no way you are going to kiss that mouth and obviously neither do the guys in these videos.
**Now the two important things that distinguish these scenes from other gonzo type videos is that the performers actually kiss multiple times in the scene and the guys orally service the women. It is actually common for them to do that prior to the women returning the favor on the guys. Just these two things elevate these gonzo style videos to a level that most gonzo studio never go and may make joining well worth it.
**Now I am giving this site a pretty high score which might look strange after I said so many negative things but there is no denying that the people responsible for this site strive to offer a very good product and even if I am not that satisfied myself. I do recognize that this may be more because of my personal taste then their efforts. |
|
01-07-14 11:39am
Replies (9)
|
Reply
942
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
Triple's Reply
I suspected that might be the case. I believe 8 is the maximum number of files you can queue on a download manager for Dogfart.
|
01-06-14 01:22pm
|
Reply
943
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
Triple's Comment
I have a few questions that might help me or somebody else in replying to your post.
1-What do you mean by some movies? Are we talking queuing 10 or less videos/photosets or a lot more?
2-What do you mean when you say that you walk away from your pc? Are we talking for a few minutes or a lot longer?
|
01-06-14 06:52am
|
Reply
944
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Of course it isn't. Why would any performer want to change her name every few weeks when word of mouth is an integral part of how their career grows.
I know that it's significantly harder to find all the scenes of Eastern European performers because they have so many different names that it's next to impossible to find them all without doing some serious research. You just have to look at North American performers to see that having only one name is better for a long term career.
|
01-06-14 06:32am
|
Reply
945
|
I Love Mini Skirts
(0)
|
Reply of
Triple's Comment
What I'm writing below applies to any site listed on TBP so if you have any other site that you are curious about then simply do the same thing for those.
TBP doesn't have a review of every site listed on their site but they tend to still offer info on the content like how many videos or photo sets can be found in the members area. Usually this info is updated on a fairly regular basis so simply check the dates for the facts and you'll know how accurate the info is.
It's different in the case of this site because they actually did a review last month so you know the info is accurate and you have an accompanying review to go with the facts.
P.S: You may or may not be aware but TBP's claim that the scenes on this site are all exclusive is incorrect since they are all leased scenes that are available elsewhere. That is not TBP's fault since I'm sure that is what the site claimed but I know different since I recognize the ladies and the scenes on this site. If you are joining the network for only these scenes then pick a cheaper site than this one but if you are looking for the scenes on the other sites then go ahead.
|
01-05-14 09:54am
|
Reply
946
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
audrina69's Comment
This is one of those really strange site/network that exist on the net. On the one hand they hire some really amazing looking girls but on the other hand I can't stand their style of porn. I guess I'm in the minority because they appear to be popular but I know that I never kept a single thing that I downloaded from them. Not that I had downloaded a lot but I simply didn't want their stuff to clutter my drives and I knew I'd never enjoy watching anything else.
I'm not a huge fan of the promotional approach some sites offer unless it's a reduction in the price of the membership. Otherwise you have to stay a long time and possibly pay a lot of money for a site that you could have simply joined right away for less money than you have already spent these long months.
|
01-04-14 10:38am
|
Reply
947
|
Playboy.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Comment
Fair warning to anyone looking to join anything with the name Playboy because I joined their main site a few years ago and I had to do the same thing to cancel. That's why I will never join another Playboy site.
|
01-04-14 10:31am
|
Reply
948
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't think so and I don't even think that I was on one that stopped updating during my membership but I have joined some sites that were dead when it comes to new content. I just knew that prior to joining and was only doing so to get access at their past stuff.
|
01-04-14 10:29am
|
Reply
949
|
Everything Butt
(0)
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Reply
See I have a different opinion because they almost lost me when they decided to add a guy to the mix. The site was originally solo and g/g only but I guess pressure from fans made them alter the site to add a male to the mix. The reason why I stayed is that most of the videos were shot in such a way that you could satisfy both the people like me who want to see only g/g and the guys that wanted to have males involved in the scene by having the g/g only stuff ahead of the b/g/g stuff later in the video. I know that they have now gone back to a g/g or g/g/g only style and that's too bad for you but great news for me.
Frankly the male is really obsolete in a scene where extreme ass play is involved. Especially when most girls do anal fisting. Frankly Sex and Submission is the site you want if b/g stuff is what you want to see on Kink.
|
01-04-14 10:27am
|
Reply
950
|
Cathy's Craving
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Reply
She may still be updating with the odd new video but if what I saw when I was a member last year is indicative then they are on the rare side of things. The vast majority of the updates I saw are remasters of her older scenes. Nothing wrong with that and her site isn't exactly charging huge amounts of money to join so I have no complain.
If she was charging above 20$ then I might have an issue with pretend new updates but 15$ is a very reasonable amount to pay for what Cathy has to offer. Just be forewarned that returning members may not have much new stuff to download.
|
01-03-14 10:21am
|