Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2451
|
Spunky Bee
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I agree that anal is not for everyone but I thought I should mention it since Abigaile and many of the models on the other sites have done iton a few sites. There is plenty of content to satisfy many people but I don't think this is a group of sites that requires a long term membership and I can't see myself rejoining in a year to get whatever they will have added since my last visit.
|
03-20-11 06:15pm
|
Review
2452
|
Spunky Bee
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-All exclusif content.
-You get access to 9 other sites.
-Content is dated.
-Videos can be downloaded in quicktime, mpeg and WMV.
-You can stream videos in low, medium or high quality flash.
-Photosets can be downloaded as a complete zip file. (res: 2464 x 1643) over 100 pics per set |
Cons: |
-Site is tiny with only about 30 videos and photosets.
-They update about once a week but one week you get the photoset and the next week you get the video.
-The sites other than this one all use the same models but the name may be different from site to site and the action is often similar for each model so it can get repetitious. |
Bottom Line: |
-I've had my eye on Abigaile which is the name spunky bee is more commonly known under, since she first came onto the porn scene in 2009. She has worked for a couple of other sites but this is the only site that offers so much content.
-The only reason I joined this site is because it's the only one that offers so many sites under the tonybucks banner. This would be a poor stand alone site and frankly all of them would be in this category. There simply isn't enough content to justify such a high join price.
-My score is based on the fact that you get access to so many other sites but I found that the content on the other sites to be similar from one site to the next and they all use the same models in each of the other sites.
-Be advised that the content for most sites is your typical boyfriend/girlfriend type of sex with pussy penetration only. Very few models do anal so anal fans might want to avoid joining. |
|
03-20-11 09:43am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
2453
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Sadly I think it's a by product of American culture. There is a strong belief that bigger is better so it makes sense that many porn site would try to appeal to that mentality. The reality is very different because often bigger isn't better. It's usually more but more crap is not a good thing.
I think that's why ddf claims they have 10 sites for 30$ because that looks great. The reality is that they really only have 5 sites that upodate with truly new content while all the others are BS.
|
03-20-11 08:12am
|
Reply
2454
|
Beauty Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
That's a good idea. I know we all have different porn budgets but $20 for all that amazing content is a small amount to pay and your money will help keep this network going. Not too mention that teen mega world updates with at least 1-2 new video a day.
|
03-20-11 07:04am
|
Reply
2455
|
Beauty Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Ik2fireone has pretty much touch on everything so I will only add that beaty angels is all leased content. You can find it on other sites like smackmybitch and 18xgirls. The great thing with teen mega world is that you get their content plus all the other stuff.
I avoid almost all trail membership because too often they limit what you have access to. I recommedn that you simply rejoin teen mega world and this way you'll have another month to download this sites content and all the stuff that they have updated on the other sites.
|
03-20-11 06:51am
|
Reply
2456
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Your the perfect example of why it's a bad decision for sites to do those things. I can appreciate any site looking for a way to cut cost so that they can stay in business but it should not be at the cost of their members trust. Instead of trying to update each site with new content then simply limit the updates to a couple of them.
Keep the other sites open so that new customers can get the older content. This way you have happy new customers and can retain your older paying customers as well.
|
03-20-11 06:45am
|
Reply
2457
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I was never a big DDF fan per say but I was a huge Hands on Hardcore one so part of my annoyance with them is the fact that content from one site somehow disapears from the original site and reappears on another of their site as a new update. I guess newbies wouldn't necessarily recognize that but it's rather annoying for a guy like me who remembers that update from the prior site.
On the other hand they aren't charging a lot for all their content so it's hard to be hangry at them.
|
03-19-11 05:33pm
|
Reply
2458
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Either I'm getting picker or more and more sites which I used to enjoy are offering less interesting updates. Reality King, BangBros, Naughty America and even some of the updates at Brazzer seem less appealing. RK and Bangbros are by far the worse of the bunch. At least NA and Brazzer still have some good scenes.
|
03-19-11 05:28pm
|
Review
2459
|
Freddie's World
(0)
75.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-All exclusive.
-Over 150 videos.
-Most of the models appear to be unknows rather than professionals so this adds an amateur feel to the videos.
-They update with one new video a week. |
Cons: |
-Many of the scenes lack decent lighting so the action is often hard to see properly.
-The scenes star almost exclusively Freddie so that can be a plus if you enjoy him and major negative if he annoys you.
-I found that the same performers are in too many videos.
-Navigation on the site is annoying because you can only move forward or backward by scolling one page at a time and no way to skip a page or pages. That's a pian when you want to see the updates on page 15 because you'll still have to scroll through the first 14. |
Bottom Line: |
-This is a simple site of a an older gentleman who has sex with a variety of women ranging in age from late teens to early 40's and films it for us to see. The camera angles aren't too bad and the action is pretty good. The only thing that hurts this site is that the lighting could be better but I guess you'd lose the amateur feel to some of the scenes.
The other big thing that hurts it is the fact that too many of the videos star the same 2 women
Angel and Tracy Lain. |
|
03-19-11 11:12am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2460
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I like them both and they can enhance a scene if used properly.
|
03-19-11 10:44am
|
Reply
2461
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
You are correct that it's not a good excuse. I just think that it's a reality for almost all porn sites these days and I don't see a light at the end of the tunnel. Most sites are still updating but many of them do so less frequently so that instead of new content each day or so you now get new content once or twice a week.
My biggest issue with DDF is in the fact that many of their updates are older scenes that have been remastered or a scene from one site is updated on another site as though it's new content.
|
03-19-11 10:38am
|
Reply
2462
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
I agree with you that the quality has been dropping a little more each year. In their defense. I don't think they are alone because I find that a lot of porn sites/network are also suffering a similar fate.
|
03-18-11 06:36pm
|
Reply
2463
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I use the ones that come with IE and Firefox. The question should be who doesn't use a pop-up blocker and why?
|
03-17-11 06:56pm
|
Reply
2464
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I enjoy looking at a woman wearing a nice pair of high heels prior to the sex scene but I prefer to see barefeet once the action starts.
|
03-15-11 06:30pm
|
Reply
2465
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
There is a significantly larger market today than years ago but that's because it's easy to get and mostly invisble. Most people access get their porn through the net or on DVD's today so you no longer need to drive to a porn cinema where you might be recognized.
I never have any problem disussing my mainstream movie collection with coworkers and friends but I will never discuss my porn collection with them for fear of their reaction so in my book porn is still a taboo subeject.
|
03-13-11 10:42am
|
Reply
2466
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Hodgepodge's Reply
That doesn't sound very good unless they were doing major changes to servers and such. Otherwise that could mean another porn company that's dying a slow death.
|
03-13-11 10:32am
|
Reply
2467
|
First Anal Quest
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Comment
FAQ is a very good site to get some of the first decent anal scenes from many newbies but this is not a site you remain ammeber for more than one month. I keep track of the updates and rejoin when I find that they have accumulated enough. I know you get a member to doubleviewcasting.com but frankly most of the girls on that site are the same ones as on FAQ and the multiple angle thing is mostly gimmick.
|
03-12-11 07:23am
|
Reply
2468
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Some sites I access every day because they have at least one update a day and some I visit a couple of times a week because they update a couple of times a week.
|
03-11-11 06:01pm
|
Reply
2469
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
Looker's Comment
I agree that they have some super cute models and they also have the more hardcore shoots of some of them. The problem is that none of these models are exclusive to TCC so you can find them doing hardcore shoots on other sitse and in my opinion the models look better on the other sites.
|
03-10-11 07:00pm
|
Reply
2470
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I downloaded a couple of scenes and watched them until the pop shot but none has survived my purge. When all is said and done. I just found that none of the scenes are wood inducing and that's why I watch porn.
I really enjoyed your review and you hit all the important points. If anyone is really curious about what extreme might mean to you then they can always ask you.
|
03-09-11 07:02pm
|
Reply
2471
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
I don't know. Maybe it's a mixture of your logging identification and some other active passwords. then again it could have been a general email sent to many members. People like you that aren't member anymore simply deleted the email and people like me had to email their support service to get a new logging and password.
|
03-09-11 02:44pm
|
Reply
2472
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have nearly 1TB of porn on an external hard drive
and internal drive but I still consider myself a somewhat collector. I think in large part because I save the porn but rarely revisit the content that
I've saved over the last few years.
|
03-09-11 02:41pm
|
Reply
2473
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Yes it is. In their defense they do call their site facial abuse. I would call it simply abuse which is the main theme of most videos.
I only rejoined them because of some of the performers they had on their site. I honestly didn't imagine that these girls would willingly allow themselves to be treated so badly.
I saw some personal pictures of a model that accepted to shoot for them and quit a very short time within the shoot because of the horrible treatment she was subjected to. Blood shot eyes and bleeding nose. You'll never see that shoot because she left too early. That's why I will never recommend that site to anyone.
|
03-08-11 02:43pm
|
Reply
2474
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
I had no major technical problem with the site. All my issues were about the content and you are correct in saying that it's extreme and in my view not good extreme but really unpleasant extreme.
|
03-08-11 02:38pm
|
Reply
2475
|
Seventeen Video
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
I noticed the discrepancy in models names but I only found a couple so I didn't mention it in my review. It's not a bad site but there are better ones out there.
|
03-08-11 02:36pm
|