Thanks Khan! I realize that it's hard to catregorize these sites and I give you guys all the credit in the world, but I'm also happy to hear that it's being looked into. True amateur sites seem to be a rarity these days and identifying them is difficult, so any help is appreciated!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-You get 150 videos of girls with the biggest gams that I've ever seen that has updated weekly for approximately 3 years now
-A larger portion of the girls are amateurs than other sites on the network, although more recent ones are pros
-Included with your membership is full access to a couple dozen sites all for under $25 a month which is a good return for what you pay
-The website is a bit plain but standardized throughout the entire site so you'll get used to the navigation very quickly
Cons:
-I've definitely seen better quality videos and pictures than what you get here, so HD lovers would probably be better off elsewhere
-Some people would definitely say that some of the girls were ugly and perhaps too thick in places other than the ass, although I didn't think so
-Although I liked the easy navigation, the site could use a redesign since I found minor features like ratings and search to be error prone
-If you don't like this site, the network offers plenty of other niche content
Bottom Line:
This is the third site I've reviewed on the Bang Brothers network and after two less than enthusiastic reviews of their sites I wasn't holding out much hope for this one quite frankly. However, I can now say that I was pleasantly surprised and except for a couple minor complaints I came away very pleased.
The setup is exactly the same as other sites on the BB network which is very plain but efficient. There aren't many bells and whistles but that's not why we come to sites like this anyway. The search and rating functions seem to have a few kinks and don't work as they should which I found annoying but not disruptive.
As for the videos themselves, it certainly isn't HD, but all in all I think the quality is pretty good running around 1000k for the newer vids (about half that for older ones however). More so than the other sites I've reviewed, this one uses amateur performers which can be a good or bad thing depending on your tastes. If you like perfect figures and faces, this isn't for you. However, for the true amateur lover that enjoys wide hips this place is a paradise.
The only thing I can really complain about is the variety of breast sizes since I like them bigger myself, but that's not the focus of this site. I guess I just wish the other BB network site that focused on asses hadn't used so many mainstream stars (they are beginning to however). It isn't for everyone and there's no glam here, but with full network access I definitely recommend checking it out.
This is a great question and I think it's elicited a lot of good responses. I think every site should offer a trial, but at the same time I respect a webmaster not wanting to give away his full product. I wouldn't even mind a DRM restriction for the trial if it was that important, although a hate DRM so I'd go with download limits as someone here suggested. And I am VERY onboard with the idea of sites not charging full price right away when they have very little content to offer yet. Sure you are joining on the faith that the collection will get built up, but how many times have we all been burned there. Last, if you are going to offer a limited access trial, then state up front that such is the case and give us at least some idea of how much we'll get to see as a member. If done right it'd be like a movie trailer, but in most cases now it's not fully disclosed and folks feel cheated. If all webmasters were up front I think most people would respect that and we'd have to pitch in by discouraging people that fly in and want to download everything off the site in one swoop...by not doing it.
I have to admit that when I first saw this site introduced today on TBP, I was pissed. Once again we have a site from Naughty America categorized as amateur girls that upon the quickest inspection clearly features pornstars. You easily recognize the names on the tour and I wasn't very open to this one. However, the more I thought about it the more I realized that maybe it's not so bad and my prior view of NA was getting in the way.
The byline on the site's main page is "a sharp fucking contrast to reality" which upon first inspection compelled me to react with a hearty, "Yeah right!" My cynical response aside, it really does appear that NA is trying to do something creative here. My biggest criticism of their network was a lack of creativity more than it was about a lack of amateurs, so I'm certainly willing to give this one the benefit of the doubt and maybe it is worth a try for those looking for something a little different from a familiar source.
So, in trying to be a little more about the end of a Jerry Springer episode than an Afterschool Special, perhaps the lesson here is to be open to new kinds of porn, especially those featuring an "alt" feel. As with all kinds of alternative media, eventually those go mainstream and aren't really alternative at all. We're seeing that in the world of alt porn and that may end up sucking, but for better or for worse I still liked "alternative mainstream" and perhaps I will like this stuff too.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The site has been updated weekly since April of '04, resulting in approximately 175 episodes that can be downloaded in WMV or MPEG format
-The site allows you to set ratings for the scene and the performer, so you know what's popular
-Along with your membership you get a total of 15 different network sites all for under $25 a month which is a good value for the volume of content
-The site is updated once a week, but when you include the entire network there's new content added every weekday
Cons:
-Although a few scenes have some amateurs or just newbies that haven't been seen before, most are recycled pornstars that appear on just about every similar network
-While the newer clips play at 1000k, the older clips are listed 500k and often play even lower
-The ratings system didn't always seem to work for me, often landing my browser at an error page and many of the scenes had no votes at all
-There aren't any options for quality on the videos or pictures since all come at one set speed
Bottom Line:
This is the second site I've reviewed for the Ox Pass network and is one of the main reasons I joined since it seemed to offer a good amount of amateur scenes. There's plenty of content here since you get over 3 years worth of scenes, but I found that my initial impression, right or wrong, had been a bit off the mark.
The site has a typical layout, with 20 scenes listed per page and offers well done individual pages with easy options for streaming or downloading. Each "episode" comes with 2 picture sets, one true digital shots and the other vidcaps (no zip options). The newer vids run at 1000k, but older vids run at less than half that speed.
One nice feature is that, for any scene or clip, you can give it a rating on a five point scale of "ok", "liked", "good", "great", or "super". However, if you thought a scene sucked you are apparently out of luck and I ended up with an error message more than once when I tried to vote. There is also a search function, but I found that many searches regularly missed older material.
In the end, most of the performers are well known pornstars and the recent episodes offer the same lame setups featured on other sites. I also doubt these girls are really moms since most look barely in their 20s. What the site does have to offer is a great price that includes full network access. If you like big boobs and huge asses you can't go too wrong here, but I wish the girls featured more of what God gave them than their plastic surgeons.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-You get nearly 200 "episodes" containing a video and a picture set (although they are usually vidcaps)
-Unlike sites on some other networks, many of the vids get right to the action and dispense with repetitive scenarios about bumping into the girls by accident
-You get a variety of very hot girls as long as you like them with a bigger body size to go along with their big "assets"
-The cameraman talks a lot which could get a bit annoying, but I found him funny and enjoyable for the most part
Cons:
-More recent vids can be downloaded in WMV or MPEG format, but earlier vids are only WMV and you have no quality options
-The video quality is only ok for the most recent videos and downright lousy for the older ones
-Although the site tries for an amateur feel, many (if not most) of the girls are well established porn stars and not amateurs
-Even when they get right to the sex, the formula and sequence is almost always the same and I think the scenes would be better if they were edited down
Bottom Line:
This is the first site I've reviewed for the OX Pass network and the one that convinced me to join. I must admit that a couple different established pornstars prompted me to signup since I thought there was a nice mix of amateurs and pros. However, I found that the latter outweighed the former by a wide margin.
The site is organized fairly well, although I wish the vidcaps had shown more of the girls faces rather than just their racks. Each girl gets her own page which is very standardized unlike other networks that change the format repeatedly. You get a dropdown menu for different vid formats which include WMV and MPEG in most cases. Older vids are only in WMV and appear to have been shot for a different site called "Nice Naturals". I'd suggest sticking to the newer stuff since the quality of the older material is nearly unwatchable.
You also get a very nice search function, but I found it didn't work all the time. Sometimes I'd end up at the home page instead of the results page and there were numerous instances where I found a girl by browsing the site that didn't appear in the search results at all. Also, each girl has a list of characteristics, but as far as I can tell that information isn't searchable.
Compared to sites from a recent network I reviewed, there is much to like here since I found the scenes less forced and more erotic. However, many minor issues add up to a big headache and I'd only recommend the site if the girls on the tour strike your fancy.
When I intially voted this morning I wanted there to be a higher limit, but I changed my mind just now and thought I'd say why. I too have wanted to write more since I tend to use as much space as I'm allowed. While more would seem to be better, I actually think that wanting to go over the limit may be an indication that the review is getting too long winded. I have usually found that if I go back over the review I can easily edit out some things and still say everything I wanted to express. So, I think a limit is a good idea, although maybe it could be upped conservatively at first. If reviews get too long, I wonder if people won't read them.
I just joined up with Ox Pass and although I've found some downsides I'd say overall that I'm pretty happy. However, I did want to ask about the search function and options for finding and sorting the performers.
First, although I have typed in certain names into the search function, I have found girls that didn't appear in the search that I did find when browsing each site. Additionally, when I try to sort the girls using the alphabetical function, there are some that don't show up either. Is this a know issue?
Second, you can bring up a description of a girl from the cast list that includes attributes like hair color, weight, and breast size. I haven't found a way to search for these attributes, but figure there would have to be one since, otherwise, what's the point of having them listed? I tend to like bigger girls and would like to sort them by "averaqe" or "heavy" since, unlike Sir Mix A Lot, I don't like girls with "big butts" to have "itty bitty waists". ;)
If anyone can offer any insight here I'd appreciate it.
I apologize if my tone sounds overly accusatory, but I've been very mindful of the categorizations being used by TBP and PU and especially their definition of amateur content. I can't think it's easy finding a concise set of descriptions that allow them to be consistent and make it easy to find similar types of material. I just wanted to preface my complaint with that statement since the folks here have done more to classify sites than any other wbsite I've ever visited.
That said, in what way can this network be classified as amateur? The tour page shows a number of established pornstars and each site has a very glamour feel. One is described as featuring "porn newcomers" and and I suppose that could qualify as amateur, but all the sites feature performers that have names like "Melissa Milano" and "Tira Banks" which don't sound like amateurs.
I give the folks here all the credit in the world for doing a spectacular job and I feel conflicted about pointing out a detail that in the big picture is pretty damn minor. One of my recent rants even focused on the fact that many sites which claim to be amateur are really not, so finding the "real" ones isn't an easy job. All I can say is that this network didn't seem to come even close to being classified as amateur and I wonder if there's something I'm just not seeing. If so, please let me know what it is!
I have always been intrigued by sites like this one that let you customize various features of performers, but until recently the graphics just weren't up to snuff. On initial inspection I'd have to say that it's still going to be awhile until a 3D image can turn me on enough to pay for it, but it does have some apparent advantages.
I must say that my interest was piqued while going through the tour since one of the things you can customize is the length of a perfromer's hair and anyone who has read my past comments (ok, perhaps more like rants) knows that I'm always searching desperately for sites featuring a girl with short hair.
Despite the ability to have short haired girls, I just don't think this one is for me, but would very much like to be convinced otherwise. I have seen some sites with customizable scenarios and real performers which look interesting, although there has to be a limit on how much you can do and I bet changing the girl's hairstyle isn't one of the options.
So, while we continue to wait for even better technology, if anyone has experiences with sites like this (or this specific site) I'd sure like to hear about them!
Thanks for the update on Danni.com! I am very glad to hgear some things are improving, but it sounds like some things just haven't changed. I still stand by my statement that things will only be restored to their former glory if Ms. Ashe herself comes back.
By the way, have they added any recent content of Codi Milo? She a recent favorite. Can any of the older content with Julia Hayes be accessed? When I signed up last year it wasn't there, but had hopes it would be restored.
It looks like Ken has already replied to your message, but I will second his vote of confidence in the folks that run this site. I am sure it will be a great site once they get going since I had great experiences with their other sites. Can't wait to review this one!
Thanks for the info and of course they'd add the new sites right after I cancelled my membership! Hopefully other folks will chime in as to whether or not the value has increased with the new lineup.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The network includes 10 individual sites with hundreds of movies and thousands of pictures on various niches like MILF, best friend's sister and mother, office hanky panky, latinas, and hot co-eds
-Many of the more recent vids run as high as 2000k for WMVs and can also be downloaded in MPEG, MOV, and MP4 formats while recent pics are very high quality and can be downloaded as zips
-If you like glam pornstar content w/o anything kinky (except for anal) this will probably fit the bill nicelly
Cons:
-Vids and pics added since '06 are of high quality and have many options for downloading like zips, but before that vids run 512k (WMVs) at best and often worse and pics are low res and zip options are spotty
-Most of the sites used tired and cliched scenarios and set ups that grow old very fast and make you plead for them to stop talking and just have sex already
-Although many of the sites started with pure amateur content, the performers have gradually become almost entirely pornstars
Bottom Line:
I joined this network for access to 3 specific sites (Naughty Office, Naughty Bookworms, and My Best Friend's Mom) but you also get 7 additional sites all for under $25 a month. Like most people I hoped that those 3 sites would justify the cost for all 10 and in the end I do think I got my money's worth, but beyond the basics there really wasn't much value to be found.
The network fills a number of other niches with a couple latina sites and a few dedicated to teens, but there really isn't anything unique here. In fact, I found the lack of a dedicated lesbian site and little lesbian content within the existing sites to be very disappointing.
The newer vids and pictures are very high quality, but the further back you go the worse that quality gets. I also found the site design dull, cluttered, and very non-standardized which I think could be addressed with a day or two of work. Of course these details are small things separately, but taken all together they add up to a major annoyance.
If you like pornstars, be they newbies on the way up or old pros on their way over the hill (and many who've already reached the bottom) then this may fit the bill and could elicit a rave review from others. However, from a network billing itself as "The Difference Is Here" I really expected much more in the way of creativity and unique niches. So, while nothing is "wrong" with the network per se since it does deliver lots of sex, I think my $25 a month could be better spent elsewhere.
I agree completely Dporn dude! I did like a couple of the other NA sites, but overall I'm just waiting for my membership to run out and wasn't impressed at all. :(
The webmaster that replied to my comments was HarleyGirl who runs the All Porn Access network and sites like Pornstar Classics and the soon to be opened Caballero Classics. I did a review and mentioned some things that would make the user interface easier to use and she replied right away saying she was going to address those things. Whether she does actually do it or not, it was nice to get direct feedback to my feedback which is what PU really envisioned for the site. It was pretty cool and check out my reviews of their sites!
You are certainly welcome for me spreading the word which is easy to do when you put out great products! Someone might think you were paying me to say this stuff, but I can assure everyone that isn't the case. I'm very much looking forward to joining the site and getting some nice movies I likely owned, but the tape got distorted by repeated viewings if you know what I mean. ;) Keep up the great work and if you ever need someone to evaluate the site with a free pass, I might be convinced to do that for you. ;) Just kidding!
Thanks for the comment dude! I was wondering if I was one of the only "classic" folks on here (otherwise referred to as an "old fogie")! I think you always have a soft spot for the porn you grew up with and the 80s is definitely that for me. My first pin up love was Julia Hayes, but she didn't do any real porn unfortunately. So, the likes of Patricia Kennedy and Madison (great scene from Hot on Her Tail) will keep me smiling. :)
I'm showing my age since when I first read your message I thought you meant World of Wrestling rather than World of Warcraft, which is what I assume you meant. :) Thanks for the comment!
Thanks for the praise dude, but I didn't think my reviews of NA were the most flattering. If you are into glam pornstars you'll probably like it, but I like some amateur content which was lacking here. Still, I appreciate the kind words and am glad to see you active on the site again. I may be ahead of you in points for the moment, but you're still the dude...I mean the man. ;)
I have been a frequent visitor at LezLoveVideo.com which offers a very wide slection of lesbian videos, both hardcore and softcore, that appeal especially to lesbians but also to couples. What I did not know until just recently however was that the same folks started it all with this site, LezLove.com. I am a fan of the video store and its associated forum, so I thought I'd check out the free side of the original site.
At first glance it appears to have quite a collection of lesbian erotica, especially vintage content. There are many kinds of lesbian porn, some that just focus on kissing and/or tribbing, while others get into the "dyke" genre that isn't always considered P.C. While I can't say that any of these are the exact type of porn I enjoy, I have been increasingly dissatisfied with "mainstream" lesbian porn since it's made by men and often performed by women who are not lesbians. And despite the steamy nature of many lesbian scenes, you really can tell when one or both of the girls isn't really into it.
It's a not right at the top of my list of sites to join, especially since I get the impression that the site isn't updated that much (or at all), but I wanted to put it out there especially if anyone has been a member in the past. At the very least it's an interesting find in the TBP archives that some may enjoy. And if there are any real lesbian aficianados around here I'd sure like to hear from them!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-You get around 165 episodes, each containing a video in numerous formats (WMV, MOV, MPEG, and MP4) and a picture set, all downloadable
-The more recent episodes include videos running at 2000kbps (WMVs) with true digital shots (not vidcaps) that are downloadable as zip files
-You get full access to the Naughty America network "Tier 1" sites (10) for under $25 a month
-The site offers the second highest number of vids on the entire network, so if you like what you see there's plenty more
Cons:
-Although vids from the last few months run from 700k to as high as 2000k, the majority of the episodes are only 512k and in most cases run much slower
-The picture sets drop in quality the further back you go with pre-'06 sets being mostly vidcaps and often without zip options
-While not as bad as some other NA sites, the scenarios are lame and really dampened my enthusiasm for the scenes
-Many of the earlier episodes aren't dated and updates only seem to come about once a week if not longer
Bottom Line:
I've now reviewed most sites on the Naughty America network and some have certainly been better than others. This one certainly wasn't the worst, but it is still far from the best and I fear I'm beginning to sound like a broken record.
Like the rest of NA the newer videos and picture sets are very good quality. However, the further back you go the worse the quality gets and the fewer options are available for downloading. That isn't uncommon as technology improves, but the real problem is the lack of flow to the site with style changes occuring every few months in how the content is organized on each girl's page.
The vids themselves are very predictable and only the reality of better odds for hooking up with a teacher above your best friend's mom make this site more realistic. Most of the "teachers" are pornstars and a number of them provide repeat performances, which can be good or bad depending your preferences. Personally, I found it repetitive and would have liked more variety, but if you like MILF-esque pornstars with a teacher student fantasy scenario you will probably find the site enjoyable.
In the end I found this site to be very middle of the road, being neither terrible or excellent. The full newtork access is nice and the price isn't bad either, yet I still can't really recommend this site very highly and I've already cancelled my rebill. The amount of content is a plus, but if you want cutting edge look elsewhere since I found this one pretty dull.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-You get videos and pictures of 75 different girls, all with a masturbation scene and most with a hardcore scene
-The newer videos go as high as 2000kbps for WMV files and also include MPEG, MOV, and MP4 files formats for download
-The picture sets are very good on this site including real digital shots with good resolution for all sets save for the oldest ones on the site and all have zip options
-You get full access to the 10 "Tier 1" Naughty America network sites, all for under $25 a month
Cons:
-None of the updates are dated on the main page (although some are on the girl's page) except for the most recent girl and it's about two months old as of this review
-Most of the videos go no higher than 512kbps and many actually run much slower than that (more like 242)
-Some of the older pic sets are labelled high quality, but I think the actual shots deserved that designation about 6 years ago at best
-The site is in desperate need of a redesign with all info being formatted the same way
Bottom Line:
When I first joined the Naughty America network I didn't give this site very much attention. It hadn't been one of the sites I'd joined specifically to see and others drew my attention much more quickly. Eventually I found a very disjointed site with some pluses, but also some negatives that are indicative of the problems with the entire NA network.
The main page of the site has a very simple layout with more advertisements for other NA content than I think there should be. Each girl has merely a thumbnail of her face with names below except for the most current girl who gets a bit more detail. The most recent update to the site was posted about 2 months prior to when this review was written, so updates seem a bit overdue.
In most cases, the girl has a masturbation video, a hardcore sex video, and 2 or 3 pic sets that are zipped. Some older content only has pic sets and perhaps a video taken while the photo shoot was done, but that's the exception and not the rule. The "high quality" shoots from the older sets leave a bit to be desired and show the age of the site.
Overall, the content is decent with very little of the boring scenarios of the other Naughty America sites you get with your membership, 10 in all. The girl tells you she likes to get it on and then she does. There are some amateurs in the oldest sets, but like the rest of NA they quickly give way to pornstars. If they'd kept it going the way it started I'd be here forever. As it is, I'm not staying.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
