Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : SnowDude (0)

Feedback:   All (576)  |   Reviews (107)  |   Comments (71)  |   Replies (398) Other:   Replies Received (296)  |   Trust Ratings (1) All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user. Shown : 301-325 of 576 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Reply 301 Ox Pass (0) Reply of apoctom's Reply Thanks for the kind words apoctom dude! You can find the casting section on the main members page about halfway down on the right hand side. They literally just started having the casting videos this past May and only have six so far, but it's definitely a great feature. I wonder if they don't show the old ones because they talk about the "persona" each girl should have, but that's just speculation on my part of course. Regardless, I found that I enjoyed the scenes each girl did after watching the casting video since I had something invested in them I suppose, despite the fact that it indicates some of the scenes are totally scripted. As for other sites, I can't remember any specifically but know I have seen the link. I never checked them out before because I didn't figure they were too exciting, but am glad I checked out the ones on Ox Pass! If I remember any (which I usually do if I don't think about it too hard) I'll let you know! Thanks again dude! ;) 07-02-07  04:13pm Comment 302 Ox Pass (0) Casting Calls I've been reviewing the sites from OX Pass, also known as the Bang Brothers network, and I haven't been impressed with very many of the sites. However, after taking a look at the new "casting" section of the network I have found a bit of a gem. It's possible that lots of other networks have casting sections like this one, so please indulge me if that's true. I've seen others before, but none of them as interesting as this one. I think what I like the most about the casting calls is that they aren't full of the BS that often occurs during the scenes they end up shooting for the network. In fact, I found that one of the scenes I have seen was totally a lie since in the casting call one girl mentioned how much she dislikes cumshots and prefers girls. The camera guy talked her into doing a scene for Tugjobs where she'd only have to jerk a guy off. Then, in the scene she eventually filmed, it shows her begging for the guy to cum on her since she loves it so much! Now, some of you are undoubtedly saying, who cares? You do have a point and I will not rant on it anymore. I will say however, that I found the scenes with the girls from the casting call to be more interesting after getting to hear about them. Maybe that makes me a total sap, but so be it! Giant boobs or a great ass makes up a lot of what's sexy, but if the girl is a total jackass or isn't into her scenes I don't really care to watch in the first place. So, if you have you OX Pass, check out the casting section! 07-02-07  12:40pm Replies (4) Reply 303 N/A Reply of roseman's Poll Although it sounds cliche, the sexiest part of a woman isn't her body. That's not to say that it isn't a big part of it and usually where it starts, but it really doesn't matter if the woman isn't confident or enjoying what she's doing. I think Allie Sin is a gorgeous woman, but in all her scenes she looks sad and bored. That's a huge turn off. I like women of all shapes and sizes, but without that certain something it's just not going to do it for me. 07-02-07  12:15pm Reply 304 N/A Reply of PinkPanther's Poll I was going to indicate that some touch up was ok, but I voted for raw since some retouching jobs go way too far and in many instances they retouch things that I'd rather they didn't like freckles, fine lines, and even a little meat on the bones. I recently saw a retouch job on a freckled star I like (Vixen Vogel) which removed all of her "beauty marks" and did some unecessary work on her entire abs area. I don't like zits at all or scars in most cases, but I'll live with them if that's the only way to keep the elements I do like. 06-30-07  05:07pm Comment 305 DP Babes (0) Contradiction In Terms? Ok, this is one really makes no sense to me. In the description for this one, which would have the full title of "Double Penetration Babes", it is listed at being an amateur site (see my previous comments for my feeling on this one), but the more shocking descriptor is "Soft Content". What? How can a site where a girl lets two guys penetrate her at once possibly be soft? I gave it the benefit of the doubt figuring that someone may get off on something like that being implied and not shown, but even the tour shows the penetration without any little blurry spots to make it R rated as opposed to XXX. I understand the problem figuring out if a site is amateur, I really do. However, how can a site like this possibly be described as soft content? 06-30-07  03:13pm Replies (2) Reply 306 N/A Reply of jd1961's Poll I might have already stated this elsewhere, but I think leaving anonymous ratings can be a good thing, especially if someone is concerned that their feedback may receive a harsh response. For me, I decided to not be anonymous from the first day it was allowed. I was nervous at first, but I think if you are fair in your comments you will ultimately be respected even if those same folks disagree with you. I do, however, think that if you go anonymous and vote no that you should at least leave a response so teh person knows why you felt they were untrustworthy. I always ask folks to tell me why since I'm not perfect and always want to be open to honest and fair criticism, good or bad. The only problem with the comment thing is how you would compel someone to leave a comment with a no vote. It would be hard to enforce and I think it can only be something you try to instill rather than a hard and fast rule. If someone leaves you an anonymous no vote without a comment, just ask why and see what happens. In most cases when this has happened to me the person has just changed their vote to yes when I really wanted to know what they didn't like! 06-26-07  09:30pm Reply 307 N/A Reply of nygiants03's Poll I'll admit that most of my reviews are written when I've been a member of a site for less than a month, but since they are dated I know full well that I'm only providing a snapshot at that particular time. Yes, the review will eventually be outdated, but isn't that why PU will be removing reviews after a year? As for the TBP reviews being more valid, I would actually think they are quite similar since I doubt all of them have been members of a particular site for a very long period. They do update their reviews, but only after awhile and there are plenty of sites I've reviewed that are way out of date. But with thousands of sites and 4 reviewers, isn't that just the nature of the beast and why PU exists? All of us are "amateurs" in a sense and if I got paid to do this (which would be awesome) I'd spend even more time than I already do on each site. Short of that, no one expects any of us to be Siskel or Ebert since we all do the best we can. Right? 06-26-07  09:03pm Reply 308 N/A Reply of Khan's Poll I was away when this poll was posted, so maybe my comment is a little late. I was definitely bothered by the anonymous trust ratings at first but now I try not to let it bother me very much. Right now I don't have any negative votes, but can tell that people changed their vote after awhile. That's probably just the nature of the beast and newer users will tend to be more harsh than people who have been around awhile. So, I don't mind anonymous ratings since people want to feel free to say what they think without being targeted if the person being rated wasn't happy. I do think, however, that people should leave a reason for what they didn't like so that user has a chance to correct or at least address whatever was wrong. I always wrote back to people who gave me a negative rating asking why and most people changed their vote after a time. Really, I just wanted to know what I could do better since I'm not perfect and don't claim to be. Just my $0.02. 06-26-07  08:53pm Reply 309 N/A Reply of Jay G's Reply Thanks for the comments Jay. I was really on the fence here since I always have more to say, but I certainly don't think it should be unlimited. At least we get to have our say! 06-26-07  08:27pm Reply 310 Inside Naughty America (0) Reply of nygiants03's Review Great review! Was this site part of the basic membership before they added the second tier sites? If it was, I guess I'm not as observant as I thought! But this does look cool since the stars act a bit more normally. Keep up the great reviews dude! ;) -SD 06-26-07  07:20pm Reply 311 Caballero Classics (0) Reply of TAZZBASH's Reply I checked the site today and it looks like it's open for business, so I thought I'd let you know since you seemed as excited as I am. And I had to spread the love...ok, the porn. ;) I'll be joining up soon for damn sure! 06-26-07  07:06pm Reply 312 Danni.com (0) Reply of Monahan's Reply Thanks for the info! I should have downloaded the Julia Hayes stuff when I had the chance! Oh well. :) Regardless, I appreciate you letting me know! -SD 06-26-07  06:48pm Reply 313 Reel Pass (0) Reply of Khan's Reply Thanks Khan! I realize that it's hard to catregorize these sites and I give you guys all the credit in the world, but I'm also happy to hear that it's being looked into. True amateur sites seem to be a rarity these days and identifying them is difficult, so any help is appreciated! Keep up the excellent work! 06-26-07  06:03pm Reply 314 N/A Reply of nygiants03's Poll This is a great question and I think it's elicited a lot of good responses. I think every site should offer a trial, but at the same time I respect a webmaster not wanting to give away his full product. I wouldn't even mind a DRM restriction for the trial if it was that important, although a hate DRM so I'd go with download limits as someone here suggested. And I am VERY onboard with the idea of sites not charging full price right away when they have very little content to offer yet. Sure you are joining on the faith that the collection will get built up, but how many times have we all been burned there. Last, if you are going to offer a limited access trial, then state up front that such is the case and give us at least some idea of how much we'll get to see as a member. If done right it'd be like a movie trailer, but in most cases now it's not fully disclosed and folks feel cheated. If all webmasters were up front I think most people would respect that and we'd have to pitch in by discouraging people that fly in and want to download everything off the site in one swoop...by not doing it. 06-26-07  11:57am Comment 315 Naughty Flipside (0) For Better or For Worse? I have to admit that when I first saw this site introduced today on TBP, I was pissed. Once again we have a site from Naughty America categorized as amateur girls that upon the quickest inspection clearly features pornstars. You easily recognize the names on the tour and I wasn't very open to this one. However, the more I thought about it the more I realized that maybe it's not so bad and my prior view of NA was getting in the way. The byline on the site's main page is "a sharp fucking contrast to reality" which upon first inspection compelled me to react with a hearty, "Yeah right!" My cynical response aside, it really does appear that NA is trying to do something creative here. My biggest criticism of their network was a lack of creativity more than it was about a lack of amateurs, so I'm certainly willing to give this one the benefit of the doubt and maybe it is worth a try for those looking for something a little different from a familiar source. So, in trying to be a little more about the end of a Jerry Springer episode than an Afterschool Special, perhaps the lesson here is to be open to new kinds of porn, especially those featuring an "alt" feel. As with all kinds of alternative media, eventually those go mainstream and aren't really alternative at all. We're seeing that in the world of alt porn and that may end up sucking, but for better or for worse I still liked "alternative mainstream" and perhaps I will like this stuff too. 06-26-07  11:47am Replies (0) Reply 316 N/A Reply of Khan's Poll When I intially voted this morning I wanted there to be a higher limit, but I changed my mind just now and thought I'd say why. I too have wanted to write more since I tend to use as much space as I'm allowed. While more would seem to be better, I actually think that wanting to go over the limit may be an indication that the review is getting too long winded. I have usually found that if I go back over the review I can easily edit out some things and still say everything I wanted to express. So, I think a limit is a good idea, although maybe it could be upped conservatively at first. If reviews get too long, I wonder if people won't read them. Just my $0.02. 06-22-07  12:21pm Comment 317 Ox Pass (0) Am I Missing Something Here? I just joined up with Ox Pass and although I've found some downsides I'd say overall that I'm pretty happy. However, I did want to ask about the search function and options for finding and sorting the performers. First, although I have typed in certain names into the search function, I have found girls that didn't appear in the search that I did find when browsing each site. Additionally, when I try to sort the girls using the alphabetical function, there are some that don't show up either. Is this a know issue? Second, you can bring up a description of a girl from the cast list that includes attributes like hair color, weight, and breast size. I haven't found a way to search for these attributes, but figure there would have to be one since, otherwise, what's the point of having them listed? I tend to like bigger girls and would like to sort them by "averaqe" or "heavy" since, unlike Sir Mix A Lot, I don't like girls with "big butts" to have "itty bitty waists". ;) If anyone can offer any insight here I'd appreciate it. 06-22-07  12:16pm Replies (0) Comment 318 Reel Pass (0) Amateurs? Really? Are You Sure? I apologize if my tone sounds overly accusatory, but I've been very mindful of the categorizations being used by TBP and PU and especially their definition of amateur content. I can't think it's easy finding a concise set of descriptions that allow them to be consistent and make it easy to find similar types of material. I just wanted to preface my complaint with that statement since the folks here have done more to classify sites than any other wbsite I've ever visited. That said, in what way can this network be classified as amateur? The tour page shows a number of established pornstars and each site has a very glamour feel. One is described as featuring "porn newcomers" and and I suppose that could qualify as amateur, but all the sites feature performers that have names like "Melissa Milano" and "Tira Banks" which don't sound like amateurs. I give the folks here all the credit in the world for doing a spectacular job and I feel conflicted about pointing out a detail that in the big picture is pretty damn minor. One of my recent rants even focused on the fact that many sites which claim to be amateur are really not, so finding the "real" ones isn't an easy job. All I can say is that this network didn't seem to come even close to being classified as amateur and I wonder if there's something I'm just not seeing. If so, please let me know what it is! 06-20-07  06:21pm Replies (4) Comment 319 3D Girlz (0) Not Ready For Primetime? I have always been intrigued by sites like this one that let you customize various features of performers, but until recently the graphics just weren't up to snuff. On initial inspection I'd have to say that it's still going to be awhile until a 3D image can turn me on enough to pay for it, but it does have some apparent advantages. I must say that my interest was piqued while going through the tour since one of the things you can customize is the length of a perfromer's hair and anyone who has read my past comments (ok, perhaps more like rants) knows that I'm always searching desperately for sites featuring a girl with short hair. Despite the ability to have short haired girls, I just don't think this one is for me, but would very much like to be convinced otherwise. I have seen some sites with customizable scenarios and real performers which look interesting, although there has to be a limit on how much you can do and I bet changing the girl's hairstyle isn't one of the options. So, while we continue to wait for even better technology, if anyone has experiences with sites like this (or this specific site) I'd sure like to hear about them! 06-20-07  04:37pm Replies (1) Reply 320 Wife Switch (0) Reply of Gazette Risque's Reply Glad to hear I continue to be helpful! :) 06-20-07  03:52pm Reply 321 Danni.com (0) Reply of Monahan's Reply Thanks for the update on Danni.com! I am very glad to hgear some things are improving, but it sounds like some things just haven't changed. I still stand by my statement that things will only be restored to their former glory if Ms. Ashe herself comes back. By the way, have they added any recent content of Codi Milo? She a recent favorite. Can any of the older content with Julia Hayes be accessed? When I signed up last year it wasn't there, but had hopes it would be restored. Thanks again! 06-20-07  03:49pm Reply 322 Caballero Classics (0) Reply of TAZZBASH's Reply It looks like Ken has already replied to your message, but I will second his vote of confidence in the folks that run this site. I am sure it will be a great site once they get going since I had great experiences with their other sites. Can't wait to review this one! 06-20-07  03:42pm Reply 323 Naughty America (0) Reply of GuyonCouch's Reply Thanks for the info and of course they'd add the new sites right after I cancelled my membership! Hopefully other folks will chime in as to whether or not the value has increased with the new lineup. 06-20-07  03:35pm Reply 324 My First Sex Teacher (0) Reply of roseman's Reply Glad to hear you find my reviews helpful since I find yours to be very helpful and informative! No, you deserve to be 1st! ;) 06-20-07  03:30pm Reply 325 My Friend's Hot Mom (0) Reply of DpornGuy's Reply I agree completely Dporn dude! I did like a couple of the other NA sites, but overall I'm just waiting for my membership to run out and wasn't impressed at all. :( 06-12-07  06:45pm Shown : 301-325 of 576 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.28 seconds.