| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
Young Libertines
(0)
|
Reply of
fairguy112's Comment
Thanks for the warning. I always thought this site looked good, but appearances can quite often be deceptive, especially in the world of porn.
|
09-01-12 08:52am
|
Reply
252
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Be very very wary of this one guys. TBP refused to link to them at one point, but for some unknown reason started doing business with them again. Plenty of comments about shady practices from PU members. Take a look at their history.
|
09-01-12 06:26am
|
Reply
253
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
Absolutely not, horrible value for money, and you don't even get to keep the video. A rip off for the uninformed
|
09-01-12 06:21am
|
Reply
254
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks Ik, the price is a very good one from PU. I just noticed it has pre checked cross selling, so look out if you sign up.
|
08-31-12 06:07pm
|
Reply
255
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Yep, I just received this myself. Any idea how much hardcore there is on there?
|
08-31-12 05:44pm
|
Reply
256
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks Ik, it's great to receive your positive comments. I know you like to do thorough reviews too, as do most regulars. We all take pride in that.
I agree not only about sorting through garbage to find the gems, but also on some networks (Teen Mega World, and Karup's for instance), bad navigation makes it such a nightmare and chore finding the stuff I want, I end membership after just one month, and think I miss a lot of good material.
If there is one underrated pro for porn sites it is navigation and having decent home pages. If you only have a certain amount of time to view porn you don't want to spend hours searching for something that is downloadable.
I agree about those low quality dvd's, but only a few years ago they were cutting edge quality! We are getting too spoilt.
|
08-31-12 04:59pm
|
Reply
257
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Thanks for your comments, I take a lot of effort to do a review so I appreciate the feedback. I usually make notes from the first day of membership, jot down a pro or a con, take some stats for the bottom line, jot down an occasional sentence or paragraph for the bottom line whenever I think of one, then after a week or two start to put it all together. I always take several weeks to complete a review because I am constantly tinkering and re editing. I know you and the other members take pride over what you write too.
I only join the occasional site,(and some of those I don't review), because I do actually view the material. I don't just download and store it away, and I only get limited time to watch porn. This is I think a good thing, because you do get jaded after a while, and unless it's brilliant porn, it all starts to look the same.
I know what you are saying about quality. I try to remember those old pirated videos from 30 years ago. Awful quality, but it was the best you could get. We are spoilt for choice and quality nowadays compared to then. Unfortunately once you see the better quality definition, then the rest starts to look inferior. What looked great two years ago, looks inferior now. I love high quality, and VB often gets the picture perspective wrong - something that American Vice got right.
One of the advantages of VB is you can view all sorts of videos with models of different age, size, race, and colour, which is something you can rarely do with most memberships. They claim they are "networks" but many of the sites on those networks all look the same.
Good to see you still around, making replies and comments.
|
08-31-12 04:47pm
|
Reply
258
|
First Anal Quest
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Thanks elephant, we always say what we think here, but I'm not sure how much we at PU are out of step with porn consumers and the industry. All we can do is try to change things a little.
|
08-28-12 09:36am
|
Reply
259
|
First Anal Quest
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Yes, agreed, and there's not a lot any of us here can do about it. All we can do is support what we consider to be quality porn.
|
08-28-12 09:33am
|
Reply
260
|
First Anal Quest
(0)
|
Reply of
joekramer08's Reply
Thanks for your comments. Yes is the answer to the question, but only a little. When they get it right it looks great, but the problem is those closeups, when the cameraman looks as though he's gone to sleep, leaving the camera resting about four inches from the groin.
The previews do look great, and are there to attract customers, which means they know what appeals. So if they make the previews look great, and know what appeals, why can't they do 20-30 minute clips with the same look and standard of the previews? After all, the previews are merely a small sample of the videos and photos. Surely it's the same cost to video and photo the whole girl as it is to video and photo one piece of the girl?....or maybe it isn't.
It would be nice if our comments helped to change things. It's unlikely but we can try.
|
08-21-12 05:57pm
|
Reply
261
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
Gulusam's Review
Welcome to PU.
This was one network high on my list. Exotics4me speaks highly of it, but one big negative is the pre checked cross sales. I never trust anyone who tries to con me. That alone means it shouldn't receive my money.
It's a big shame because the content looks great. They try to trick people with pre checked cross selling and wonder why people don't trust them enough to give them their credit card details. No wonder free download sites are going strong, despite the risk of viruses.
|
07-02-12 10:12am
|
Reply
262
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Accurate assessment. Of the sites I have joined in many respects this one is the most frustrating of all, simply because it should have scored in the high 90's, and would have done if not for the negatives. This is one of the most customer unfriendly networks out there. There is no customer service, and they seem completely oblivious to what is needed to generate, and then keep customers.
Tons of great pics with no zips so they have to be downloaded one by one, is a prime example of complete ignorance about what is needed. Superb videos, well shot, beautifully lit, stunning girls. Should have been better that 21 Sextury. It could have been the best network of all. Coulda woulda shoulda. What a waste.
|
07-01-12 03:59pm
|
Reply
263
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
Wow - now that's what I call service! Thanks for the offer Claypaws, but I am unusual in that I have no favourite models. My favourite types are ones I haven't seen before.
The info you have provided me with is just what I was looking for. I have been thinking about ATK for quite a while. Looks like they should be towards the top end of my list.
Thank you, and I hope you keep with us, here on PU.
|
06-04-12 10:18am
|
Reply
264
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Review
Another excellent review Claypaws. Any idea about how much hardcore content there is, compared to softcore?
|
06-04-12 06:49am
|
Reply
265
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
I'd have joined this one years ago if not for one of the biggest negatives of all as far as I'm concerned - pre checked cross selling. I never trust my credit card or money with anyone who tries to con me or trick me.
|
06-04-12 06:45am
|
Reply
266
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Review
Another tremendous informative review Claypaws. I hope you stay with PU and become a regular contributor.
|
05-27-12 05:42pm
|
Reply
267
|
Gay Sugar Daddy
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
Sounds a little dodgy. I've had that sort of thing happen a few times in the past on a few sites. Sometimes it is the browser or anti spyware or anti virus kicking in - for instance in the past AVG warned of viruses for a time, when I tried to login to Pirate Bay. That appeared to be AVG acting as a censor, but I never know how seriously to take these sort of warnings. I'm always wary of sites offering special offers from live chat. I suppose I am cautious and don't blame you giving that particular site a miss.
|
05-25-12 07:34pm
|
Reply
268
|
College Fuck Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Reply
Thanks for the comments. I think it is supposed to look like amateurs doing a porn home movie for fun. Trouble is, it does. But even on the supposedly professional sites in the network, they often have horrible lighting.
When it's good it is worth viewing, but it takes so long to find the worthy stuff that I gave up just over half way through my membership. There is undoubtedly great stuff on that network, and a lot that I have missed because I couldn't be bothered to wade through it all. It could do with some professional edtiting, lighting and camerawork, then it could be something worth recommending.
|
05-20-12 03:55pm
|
Reply
269
|
College Fuck Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Cheers IK! That must be the fastest reply I've ever had.
|
05-17-12 01:17pm
|
Reply
270
|
Daring Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Have to agree with the above - outstanding revue.
|
05-13-12 05:03pm
|
Reply
271
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
The better the site the more accurate the preview and tour, for obvious reasons. I went for the don't tell all box. Most of the sites I have joined, have exremely accurate previews, but that's because I don't go for the shady rip off merchant sites.
I wont touch those that have lousy previews. If you think your material is so good you have to censor it or not show much of a preview to protect your copyright material - WRONG. You lose me as a customer straight away. I always go for a PU/TBP review first, to determine if it's a reputable network or site, then decide if I want a tour or preview. If it's a lousy preview I'm gone.
This may not go down too well, but I consider some of the best previews to be on free download forums. That has got a company my money quite a few times.
|
03-25-12 08:56am
|
Reply
272
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
My 2 cents's Review
Welcome to PU, I agree this is an excellent first review.
|
03-24-12 06:37pm
|
Reply
273
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
Power off. I may be ocd but I can't stand the thought of things being on when I'm not around. However due to CT's reply, I am now considering leaving on standby in the daytime, and only turning off at night.
|
03-16-12 07:24pm
|
Reply
274
|
Earl Miller
(0)
|
Reply of
mrmachebeuf's Review
Please update the score. 50 is the lowest possible, and given what has been said by members, the score needs to be altered.
|
03-14-12 07:03pm
|
Reply
275
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Good review Toad. I agree about the quality. For me 21 Sextury are the best network. I also agree with you about the one thing that needs improvement is the layout and navigation.
|
03-14-12 05:41pm
|
