| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
AEBN Video On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Truly excellent review Admiral, telling me everything I want to know. Like you, I am not a big fan of those VOD sites. I probably wont give it a go, but your review intrigues me enough to take a look.
|
03-12-12 09:29am
|
Reply
277
|
WTF Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Yes I agree there Frosty, the massage porn one is not so bad, although that maybe because there is one setting and one couple.
Possibly I am just being too negative (as usual), but we all know these are professional models. Even when photographing amateur models, I prefer to see directors and cameramen who are professionals, shooting in a professional way. But I do take your point. It does make it look more amateurish, which may appeal to some.
|
03-08-12 10:01am
|
Reply
278
|
WTF Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
I have edited my original comment. You get three extra sites not four like I originally said. In my last reply I then went and typed five extra sites. The mix up came because Chicki Porn is Dolls Porn on WTF. Thankfully Frosty is more reliable than I am.
As an addition I would have hoped the camerawork would improve over the years, but the latest "Wild New Year College Orgy," added at the end of last year, on College Fuck Parties, has not only 9(!) parts, it has some of the worst lighting, and worst camerawork I have ever seen.
|
03-08-12 08:48am
|
Reply
279
|
WTF Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Agreed Rusty, this place has some different content which is definitely worth a membership. It's such a great shame they can't photograph professional models in a professional way, and from comments elsehwere, these ARE profesional models. At least most of them are not the same models we see in hundreds of videos, but are relatively fresh faces (and bodies).
Thanks again Frosty, without your comment I'd have missed this one, but I was aware of Chicki Porn. I would have signed on for $15 more, with 5 fewer sites. The TBP/PU WTF link gives a massive 42 per cent off Chicki Porn prices.
|
03-08-12 08:29am
|
Comment
280
|
WTF Pass
(0)
|
|
03-07-12 01:49pm
Replies (7)
|
Reply
281
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Thanks Messmer, yes I know! I tried to register again to see if they were still doing it - they were. So I then tried to register at Team Skeet. Would you believe it, same old rip em off trick there too. Same mentality that dodgy porn dealers had years ago. Rip em off cos they're not coming back.
So I tried to register at WTF Pass, and low and behold - no cross selling! These are mainly the same sites available through Chicki Porn, with one or two big differences. You not only get 9 sites from WTF Pass instead of 5 from Chicki Porn, You get them $15 cheaper through the TBP/PU link. That's $19.95 instead of $34.95. Not only that, they don't have pre-checked cross selling, unlike Chicki Porn. So that's where my money went.
|
03-07-12 11:58am
|
Reply
282
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The first results show how out of tune I am with the majority of PU members. It also shows how in tune the TBP staff are with PU members. I voted 5 days, but for people who are here every day, it is almost certainly better to have 2 or 3 day polls, as it continually engages them with a new topic.
|
03-07-12 05:58am
|
Reply
283
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Great review Admiral, thanks for the information. I have to admit I wouldn't have thought of touching this site with a bargepole until your review. My expectations were as low as yours. Not many cons, I would have expected many more.
|
03-05-12 04:53pm
|
Reply
284
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Plenty of times. 100 per cent so far for the first option.
|
03-05-12 09:13am
|
Reply
285
|
Body Parts.biz
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
Great thorough review RB. I like the idea of amateur girls rather than glossy professional, but closeups leaves me cold, and it sounds like the site has more than its share of faults.
|
03-03-12 05:10pm
|
Reply
286
|
The Rubber Clinic
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Review
Great informative review of an obscure site. Agree about the DRM.
|
03-02-12 08:37am
|
Reply
287
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes I factor it in all the time, even though it is for me, one of the minor considerations.
|
03-02-12 07:51am
|
Reply
288
|
WTF Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
Nice one Frosty. Thanks for the info.
|
02-29-12 06:38am
|
Reply
289
|
Panda Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
This is part of the WTF newtork, which looks quite good apart from this one. What do you think of the network, Frosty?
|
02-28-12 08:43am
|
Reply
290
|
Panda Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
But is it sexy? I've seen this site advertised but it doesn't appeal to me at all. I'm not sure who it will appeal to, but at least they're trying to break out of the porn norm, I suppose.
|
02-28-12 06:00am
|
Reply
291
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Oops - never knew it existed until the poll, but will use from now on. I saw it but presumed it was for sites only.
|
02-27-12 04:23pm
|
Reply
292
|
Black Ice Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
slategrey's Comment
That's a shame. I thought as it was part of ZTOD studios it would continue.
Does anyone know what happened and why it stopped updating?
|
02-26-12 07:24pm
|
Reply
293
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
Good review elephant. I thought this was one of the best sites on the TMW network. I was a little disappointed with the network overall, but it looks to me like it has improved since I was last a member.
|
02-26-12 06:46pm
|
Reply
294
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
I'm probably not going to be popular with the majority (come to think of it I never have been!), but I voted for getting better.
Yes I hate the fake breasts, the slapping, the lousy camerawork, the tats, the usual stuff, but...
I don't want to go back to those old movies. I know some of you like them, but really, 80 minutes of movie with 10 minutes of action. Fine if you're that sort of coinnoisseur. I'm not. 70 minutes of talk, and the sex scenes were cut in, so all you saw was two anonymous groins in action. Cut in so they could sell the softcore version in places like the UK.
One month of 21 Sextury, or even my hated VideoBox is better than that. Girls in porn now are amazingly beautiful, and plentiful. Yes there is all the stuff we hate, but there's a huge amount of quality for very little money.
Maybe compared to two or three years ago you could say it is not as good, but even there I'm not sure. I consider this the golden age of porn. Maybe we are too spoilt for choice.
|
02-26-12 06:40pm
|
Reply
295
|
African Goddesses
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Likewise good to see you back Mbaya - that's you, BadAndy, Exotics, and Wittyguy all back. Now all we need is Toadsith to put in an appearance. Good valuable review by the way, of a site I hadn't heard of.
|
02-24-12 06:24am
|
Reply
296
|
18X Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
Ah, a Wittyguy review, likewise welcome back. Good to see a decent comprehensive review. Looks like a nice site.
|
02-24-12 05:59am
|
Reply
297
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
The answer is no to either gay guy or lesbian porn. However it has been great to see some gay reviews, with gay members finally establishing themsleves here. PU needed that, to be an all round site representing everyone.
|
02-22-12 09:21am
|
Reply
298
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
It may be the ability to download material rather than the content that decides the review. I hated Video Box and never went back because they had the slowest download speeds I have ever experienced. Their customer service was non existent. Streaming was impossible except some time after midnight here in the UK. Good material and value but it all depends on the ability to watch it.
For those who can access the content I fully understand why it should get high marks, but it's a lottery on download speeds. From what I have heard US appears not to be so bad, but European members often report of slow speeds and download problems.
|
02-22-12 09:02am
|
Reply
299
|
N/A
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks for the reply, exotics. I did think Oye Loca looked quite good. It's sometimes hard to tell from a few snapshots what a site is really like, but that is why PU is so useful. Think I'll make a small investment in this one, it sounds like the sort of site I'd like. There don't have to be gigabytes of material, just enough quality material to make it worthwhile. Thanks for the heads up. Good to see you around again.
|
02-17-12 06:28pm
|
Reply
300
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Graymane Messmer and Drooler sum it up in posts 12 15 and 16. A sexy guy can quite often be someone who treats women like crap, but as Heather suggests, for some women that magnetism may wear thin after a while.
However the question is what defines a sexy guy and that very often means on the superficial first impression level. I too have been on the consoling shoulder end. Unfortunately my tongue has rather a sharp edge to it. I can't resist saying that if you choose a tosser with a lousy track record, what do you expect?
Thankfully being a nice person (I think!) I ended up with a nice partner. Both of us have an edge, which sometimes makes us dangerous, if someone pisses us off. Apart from that I think we qualify as people who have honour, honesty, and decency.
Quite often thoroughly decent men end up with horrible horrible women and vice versa, nice women often end up with complete bastards for men.
|
02-17-12 06:21pm
|
